Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Canada AI Strategy Confronts Capital Flight
AI Policy Consultation | February 11, 2026
11,300 Respondents Demand Sovereign Capital, Procurement Reform and Domestic IP retention
On February 5, 2026, Innovation Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) released the official Engagements on Canada’s Next AI Strategy Summary of Inputs. The report summarizes a 30 day consultation that ran from October 1 to 31, 2025 and confirms that 11,300 participants submitted 64,600 responses across 26 policy questions about Canada’s next AI strategy.
The consultation addressed the full AI policy landscape, including research and talent, adoption across industry and government, education and skills, infrastructure resilience, national security, environmental sustainability, Indigenous data sovereignty and inclusion. The process ran under The Honourable Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, supported by a National AI Strategy Task Force composed of startup operators, investors, researchers and civil society leaders.
This article focuses on what matters most for fintech founders and investors, where the strongest inputs from the consultation relate to capital formation, procurement design, intellectual property retention and domestic scaling incentives.
Who Responded
The consultation drew wide participation. 83% submitted as individuals. 17% responded on behalf of organizations, and reflected national engagement across technology, finance, academia, professional services and public institutions.
See: $7.5 Billion Microsoft AI Buildout In Canada
52% identified as interested Canadians. 19% came from business. 13% represented academia or research. The rest included government, associations and other sectors.
Ontario accounted for 39% of responses. British Columbia 20.6%. Alberta 7.8%. Québec 7.6%.
Capital Structure Is Under Review
Across submissions, one theme stood out. Canada produces AI research. It struggles to anchor AI companies at scale.
Respondents called for sovereign capital vehicles, modernization of SR&ED and IRAP, and stronger intellectual property retention frameworks. Intellectual property retention refers to keeping ownership of core technology, patents and data assets inside Canada rather than transferring them through early acquisition or foreign incorporation. Stakeholders expressed a preference for patient domestic capital tied to retention conditions, not simply additional grants. That implies potential co-investment models, domestic head office commitments and scaling tools designed to prevent early exits or foreign acquisition.
Canada ranks among global leaders in AI research output. Yet growth stage capital is still significantly thinner than in the United States. In 2025, Canadian VC firms raised just over $2.1B, with fundraising concentrating as the five largest Canadian venture funds captured 83% of all capital raised while emerging managers raised $249M. That level of concentration narrows the number of scaled domestic capital sources available to support long runway AI and fintech growth.
When companies reach scale, many incorporate abroad or raise major rounds outside Canadian markets. Capital migration reduces ownership, long term tax capacity and domestic control over strategic assets. This consultation reflects recognition that Canada’s scaling architecture requires structural reform.
For fintech founders following new AI minister prioritizes growth over rules, this reinforces the need for commercialization outcomes and ownership durability rather than additional regulatory layering.
Procurement And Market Design
Respondents pushed for standardized procurement playbooks and real pathways from pilot to deployment. Suggestions were for coordinated procurement models that create anchor customers at scale.
See: Market Forces Pressuring Fintech Plans For 2026
Predictable domestic revenue reduces investor risk perception and strengthens valuations. It also strengthens Canadian firms’ credibility when competing internationally. Procurement design therefore influences capital formation and competitive positioning.
This matters most in regulated sectors. When government adoption aligns with frameworks such as the CIRO digital asset custody framework, compliance becomes a strategic advantage rather than a cost centre. Procurement validation can reinforce regulatory credibility and accelerate scaling.
Compute, Sovereignty And Competitive Barriers
Participants identified gaps in domestic compute capacity and reliance on foreign cloud providers. Calls for Canadian controlled infrastructure go beyond just hardware investment. They imply potential changes to data residency expectations, cloud dependency exposure and compliance thresholds.
Sovereign compute investment could open infrastructure financing opportunities while raising entry costs for firms dependent on foreign controlled platforms. Infrastructure choices influence market structure.
Governance And Scaling Dynamics
Submissions supported proportionate, risk tiered regulatory frameworks, independent audits and clearer liability standards. Respondents generally favoured governance models where obligations scale with actual risk exposure rather than one size fits all rules.
Regulatory preference was for clarity, predictability and alignment between risk level and compliance burden. High impact AI applications would face stronger safeguards, while lower risk use cases would not carry unnecessary constraints.
See: Budget 2025 Accelerates Fintech, AI, and Capital Growth
If thresholds are calibrated carefully and compliance pathways are clear, early stage firms gain certainty and investors price regulatory exposure more confidently. If risk categories are broad or implementation complex, governance costs rise and time to market slows.
The strategic issue is how regulatory architecture affects scaling speed, capital formation and Canada’s cost competitiveness relative to larger markets. Governance design influences who scales, who consolidates and who exits.
What To Watch Next
The consultation closed on October 31, 2025. The Engagement on Canada's Next AI Strategy summary report states that the inputs will inform drafting of Canada’s 2026 AI strategy, which the federal government plans to release later this year.
The report doesn't however specify any fiscal commitments or program design details. Those decisions will appear, if at all, in the final strategy document and subsequent budget measures.
From a market perspective, founders and investors should watch for concrete triggers for a sovereign capital vehicle with defined funding, commercialization linked SR&ED reform, procurement commitments beyond pilot programs, budget allocations for domestic compute infrastructure, and enforceable intellectual property safeguards.
If those elements appear with timelines and capital attached, they strengthen Canada's domestic scaling environment. If not, capital migration and entrepreneur drain will likely persist. The final strategy with design and implementation choices will be known this year.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
Leave a Reply