Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
September 17, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Public Sector Policy And Industrial Strategy, Cross Border Payments And FX, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Competition And Market Structure

On September 17, 2026, Canada welcomes deeper EU ties after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposes opening the door for Canada to become the European Union's first "associate member." The phrase has no defined status in EU treaties today, and neither side has set out the legal structure, rights or obligations that would come with it. Prime Minister Mark Carney says the substance of the relationship will matter more than its name and that any final agreement will face debate and a vote in Canada's Parliament.
The proposal comes as Canada U.S. trade tensions rise again. President Donald Trump separately directs U.S. officials to identify Canadian goods that could be excluded from federal government purchasing, then later threatens tariffs against Europe if he decides the proposed Canada EU relationship is hostile to U.S. interests. The procurement order comes first, and a White House official reportedly says it isn't retaliation for von der Leyen's proposal, so the two developments shouldn't be treated as cause and effect.
On September 16, von der Leyen delivered a State of the Union address proposing to move beyond the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Canada has with the EU toward what she calls an "Alliance for the Future." She identified advanced manufacturing, defence production, the Arctic, energy, critical minerals, batteries, AI, quantum, cyber security and economic security as areas for closer cooperation. She also said she wants to work with Canada on becoming the EU's first associate member.
Associate membership remains a proposal rather than an established EU status. EU treaties allow association agreements with non member countries, but they don't create a category called associate member with a standard package of rights and obligations. Canada and the EU therefore have to decide what market access, program participation, regulatory cooperation, mobility and institutional arrangements they actually want before the term has practical meaning.
Carney isn't presenting the idea as Canada joining the European Union. Nothing announced so far requires Canada to adopt the euro, join Schengen, accept automatic free movement, transfer taxation authority to Brussels or become subject to all EU law. Canadian political debate is already testing those boundaries, with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre supporting closer trade and defence cooperation while raising concerns about taxation, EU law and immigration rules. Carney says the final arrangement will preserve Canadian sovereignty.
Canada and Europe already have much of the institutional infrastructure needed to negotiate something deeper. CETA has applied provisionally since 2017, the two sides operate a Strategic Partnership, Canada participates in the EU's SAFE defence financing initiative as its first non European member, and governments are working on digital trade, critical minerals, energy, research and advanced technology. The proposal builds on existing agreements and institutions that already connect the two markets.
Global Affairs Canada puts combined Canada EU goods and services trade at C$178.6 billion in 2025. EU foreign direct investment stock in Canada reaches an estimated C$194 billion in 2024, while Canadian direct investment in the EU reaches C$297 billion. European companies employ about 447,000 people in Canada and Canadian companies employ roughly 275,000 people across EU member states.
Canada still depends heavily on the United States. The U.S. receives 71.7% of Canadian merchandise exports in 2025, so even a much larger European relationship won't reproduce the geography, supply chains and customer concentration that connect Canada and the American economy. Deeper European ties can still give Canadian companies more customers, capital sources, technology partners and procurement options outside a single dominant market.
The next major negotiating checkpoint is the Canada EU Summit in Montreal on October 29 and 30. Canada and the EU still need to define the proposed relationship, determine which existing agreements can be expanded and identify areas that require new legal authority. EU member states will have a role in approving whatever structure emerges, while Carney says Canada's final arrangement will come before Parliament.
The U.S. procurement action began on September 16, before Trump commented publicly on the European proposal. His procurement memorandum tells U.S. officials to identify Canadian goods that can legally be excluded from federal civilian purchasing. The White House says the action responds to Canada's Buy Canadian policies and some provincial procurement rules, which it argues restrict U.S. suppliers while Canadian companies still have access to U.S. federal contracts. The order applies to goods rather than services and doesn't immediately ban all Canadian products from U.S. government purchasing.
The White House says Canadian suppliers currently have access to more than US$280 billion a year in U.S. federal procurement covered by the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) will monitor how Canada treats U.S. goods and can recommend further action. It can also identify conditions under which access for Canadian products could be restored.
Trump commented on the Canada EU proposal later. He called possible associate membership "laughable" and said he could regard it as a hostile act depending on its purpose. He also threatened serious tariffs or reduced trade with Europe if he concludes the initiative targets U.S. interests. Those measures haven't been imposed, and a White House official reportedly says the procurement order wasn't issued in response to von der Leyen's proposal.
Carney says Canada will choose its own international relationships and argues that closer ties with Europe can make Canada a stronger and more resilient partner to the United States. His economic argument is that diversification can reduce another country's leverage even when Canada remains heavily dependent on that market.
Canadian companies don't need to replace every U.S. dollar with European revenue before diversification starts helping. More customers, capital sources, suppliers and financial relationships can give businesses more options when tariffs, procurement restrictions or other policy changes affect one market. The United States will still remain Canada's largest commercial partner by a wide margin.
Fintech and software companies may have more flexibility than industries tied to physical North American supply chains, but expanding into Europe still costs money. Firms may need new licences, privacy controls, banking relationships, payment connections and customer acquisition spending. A deeper Canada EU agreement becomes an advantage to businesses when it lowers some of those barriers.
Carney proposes that Canada and Europe explore an "integrated market for financial services" that expands consumer choice, lowers costs and improves access to capital while maintaining financial resilience. He also calls for deeper cooperation in payments, digital trade, sovereign compute, secure broadband, AI safety protocols, common AI standards and transparency. These proposals are more relevant to Canadian fintech than the associate member label itself because they identify areas where regulatory and infrastructure changes could directly affect how companies operate.
Canada and the EU already have a base for that work. CETA includes a financial services chapter, and the two sides operate a Financial Services Committee covering banking, capital markets and regulatory policy. Negotiators can use those institutions to examine where different rules create avoidable duplication and where regulators are comfortable recognizing comparable requirements.
Can a firm serve customers in both markets without rebuilding its entire compliance stack?
Can payment providers connect more easily across systems?
Can investment products and capital reach both markets with fewer restrictions?
Can regulators recognize comparable standards for identity, financial data, operational controls or professional qualifications while preserving domestic oversight?
Banking licences, securities regulation, insurance supervision, privacy, anti money laundering requirements, consumer protection and prudential rules remain jurisdiction specific. An integrated market only becomes valuable if negotiators identify concrete areas where recognition or common standards reduce duplication without creating new compliance layers elsewhere.
Canada is also opening more of its domestic financial infrastructure. Consumer driven banking and wider payments participation create new access points for fintechs, while Open Banking in Canada is developing around financial data, identity, payments and competition. Better compatibility with European systems could help Canadian firms scale across both markets if negotiations eventually reach data access, digital identity, payment infrastructure or regulatory recognition.
Carney also wants Canada and Europe to develop common artificial intelligence standards, AI safety protocols and stronger transparency while pooling sovereign compute capacity and improving secure digital infrastructure. Canada is already developing its approach to AI transparency and agent governance, while Europe has a more developed regulatory regime. Greater compatibility could lower market entry costs for Canadian financial technology companies, although different Canadian, European and U.S. requirements could also increase compliance work for firms operating across all three markets.
Payments deserve close attention because Carney names them directly alongside digital trade and financial services. Governments haven't proposed specific changes to settlement, payment access, digital identity or cross border financial data, so those outcomes can't be assumed. If negotiations eventually reach those areas, the details will determine whether Canadian fintechs gain easier access to European customers or face another set of regulatory requirements.
The October summit should provide the first indication of how much of this agenda governments are prepared to put into formal negotiations. Canadian firms should watch for specific commitments on financial services, digital trade, payments, AI standards, mobility and market access, while companies exposed to U.S. procurement also need to follow implementation of the September 16 memorandum.
Canada already has extensive trade and investment ties with Europe, but financial services integration could take the relationship into areas where domestic regulation has traditionally limited cross border scale. If Canada and the EU can reduce duplicated rules across payments, capital, financial data and technology while preserving domestic oversight, how much more practical would Europe become as a second large market for Canadian fintechs?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Leave a Reply