Not yet a done deal

Investment Executive | By James Langton | Nov 23, 2018

CCMR national regulator - Not yet a done dealMany hurdles remain for the CMRA before it becomes a reality

Canada’s regulatory landscape faces a transformation as politics, shifting priorities and new legal realities push the investment industry’s overseers in new directions.

Most obviously, the prospect of a fundamental reshaping of the regulatory framework in Canada now is, at least, a possibility – given the Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) long-awaited decision on Nov. 9, which reversed a lower court’s ruling in Quebec, that declared that a proposed federal/provincial model for a co-operative capital markets regulator is constitutional.

But while this decision knocks down a basic legal obstacle for the new model for overseeing the securities industry, that doesn’t mean that the adoption of a co-operative regulator is imminent – or even inevitable. Indeed, the SCC’s decision hints at the significance of the hurdles that still must be cleared before the proposed Capital Markets Regulatory Authority (CMRA) can become a reality in Canada.

Although the SCC has found that the proposed CMRA model is constitutional, that doesn’t necessarily mean it is a good idea. “It’s up to the provinces to determine whether participation is in their best interests,” the SCC’s decision states.

See:  CCMR Draft Prospectus and Related Registration Exemptions (Comment period ends Aug 7, 2018)

And even though several provinces have signed on to the proposed initiative, in theory, actually going through with adopting the new system, in practice, may be another matter.

“For example,” the SCC’s decision states, “the participating provinces will be required to effectively dissolve their existing securities commissions and to merge the administration of those commissions into the [proposed] authority’s organizational structure. Once this has been done, it would undoubtedly be impractical for those provinces to extricate themselves from the co-operative system at a later date.”

The SCC’s decision also points out that the legislation required to enable the proposed CMRA has not been published yet. And, once the required legislation is proposed, “it will have to be carefully drafted so as to respect the limits on overlapping, yet distinct federal and provincial authority.”

Indeed, poorly drafted legislation could prompt further challenges in court.

Certainly, policy-makers in Quebec are not ready to concede that some form of national regulation is inevitable now. Following the release of the SCC’s decision, Éric Girard, Quebec’s finance minister, said that the province intends to retain its autonomy and expertise regarding securities regulation. The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is not in jeopardy of being absorbed into the CMRA if and when the new agency comes into being.

Girard also highlighted the SCC’s reminder that the CMRA’s enabling legislation must continue to respect provincial jurisdiction, and he hinted that Quebec will be keeping a close eye on this. “We reaffirm our resolve with regard to defending both the interests of Quebecers and Quebec’s jurisdiction from any eventual encroachment,” he said.

Even longtime supporters of national regulation don’t view the CMRA as a done deal, given the amount of political spadework that still needs to be done. Ian Russell, president and CEO of the Investment Industry Association of Canada, for example, notes that although the SCC decision removes one stumbling block to the “eventual launch” of a co-operative regulator, there are numerous others.

See:  SCC hears Canada and Quebec AGs arguments on national securities regulator

Not only will all of the participating provinces need to pass legislation to enable the CMRA and to delegate their authority to the proposed agency, they may have to amend other laws, such as privacy and labour laws, to be in accord with the new regulator, Russell points out: “This will contribute to continued delay, as the pending legislation has low priority in provincial governments beset with difficult economic conditions. The approval process is further handicapped by the lack of a champion at the political level.”

Moreover, the SCC’s decision on its own isn’t likely to win over any of the provinces that currently aren’t part of the initiative, Russell suggests: “This means significant further delay, given the need to establish a regulatory interface between the participating and non-participating provinces to ensure integrated national capital markets. The participating and non-participating provinces also will have to establish an umbrella arrangement to achieve a uniform rule framework.”

The one positive sign for supporters of the CMRA model is that the new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario backs the plan despite the fact that support for the idea of a co-operative regulator is a holdover from the previous Liberal government.

Although Ontario’s new government actively repudiates many of the previous administration’s policies, the Tories are casting the CMRA initiative as being in line with the party’s goal of curbing regulation. (See accompanying sidebar story.)

Reacting to the SCC’s ruling, Vic Fedeli, Ontario’s finance minister, said, “Ontario is committed to working with the other participating jurisdictions toward the launch of the system … the co-operative system would support businesses and investors by helping to streamline regulation and reduce red tape.”

Ontario’s government also reiterated its support for the CMRA initiative in its first-ever autumn economic update, noting that the government believes a co-operative regulator would help “businesses raise capital more efficiently and better protect investors.”

Nevertheless, launching the CMRA remains a distant prospect at this point. In the meantime, the fact that the SCC validated one of the CMRA’s core purposes – better monitoring of systemic risk – shifts the spotlight to the existing members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA).

See:  Saskatchewan, New Brunswick to join national securities regulator

To be sure, systemic risk is on the agenda of both the CSA and the existing provincial securities commissions already, but the SCC ruling highlights that their efforts in this area are limited: “While provinces have the capacity to legislate [with] respect [to] systemic risk in their own capital markets, they do so from a local perspective and therefore in a manner that cannot effectively address national concerns.”

Indeed, in 2011, the SCC first ruled that the monitoring of systemic risk is an area in which the federal government could claim jurisdiction in the traditionally provincial realm of securities regulation. And the proposed federal legislation that would be adopted as part of the CMRA focuses largely on dealing with systemic risk.

“The heart of this is data collection. In the current Canadian financial regulatory regime, there is a gap in data collection because there is nobody charged with the authority to collect data relating to systemic risk threats on a national basis,” explained Kevan Cowan, CEO of the Capital Markets Authority Implementation Organization (which was established to help create the CMRA), at a hearing before the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce in early November.

At the same hearing, Cowan said that because the CMRA would carry out both day-to-day regulation and systemic risk monitoring under one roof, there could be synergies realized in this model that don’t exist in the current system.

Nevertheless, the CSA maintains that it stands ready to meet the ever-changing and evolving demands on securities regulators.

“While provincial governments will determine the nature of future relationships among all Canadian securities regulators, I am confident that our member jurisdictions will continue to work collaboratively to deliver on their core mission, which is to protect investors and promote fair, efficient and transparent markets,” says Louis Morisset, chairman of the CSA and president and CEO of the AMF.

Morisset adds: “If the CMRA initiative ever moves forward,” the members of the CSA will work together to “implement an interface” among provinces that are in the new arrangement and those that are not.

“In the meantime,” Morisset adds, “we are working on delivering on the initiatives of our 2016-19 business plan and will work on the development of a new business plan in the year to come.”

Continue to the full article --> here


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Not yet a done deal The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - Not yet a done dealFF Logo 400 v3 - Not yet a done dealcommunity social impact - Not yet a done deal
NCFA Newsletter subscribe600 - Not yet a done deal

REGISTER WITH NCFA 25% DISCOUNT CODE -> BLOCKCHAIN-19 (case sensitive)


NCFA Newsletter Banner Ad Blockchain  - Not yet a done deal

NCFA Fintech Confidential Issue 2 FINAL COVER - Not yet a done deal

BIS | Agustín Carstens | Nov 14, 2019 Keynote speech by Mr Agustín Carstens, General Manager of the BIS, at the 55th SEACEN Governors' Conference and High-level Seminar on "Data and technology: embracing innovation", Singapore, 14 November 2019. Introduction It is a great honour to address this distinguished audience today. We meet against the backdrop of the Singapore Fintech Festival and the opening, here in Singapore, of one of the first three BIS Innovation Hub Centres. Singapore has positioned itself as a centre of innovation, research and development at the heart of the world's most dynamic economic region.1 The impressive achievements in fintech relate in no small part to the work of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Singaporean authorities in creating a solid public infrastructure to foster innovation. This morning, I will discuss the role of personal data in digital financial innovation. The use of new technology with such data holds great promise, but it also presents new and complex policy trade-offs, and a clear need for domestic and international policy coordination. I would also like to share some thoughts on how the work of the BIS can contribute to this debate. The value of personal data Personal ...
Read More
BIS Agustín Carstens - Not yet a done deal
Canadian Securities Administrators | Nov 12, 2019 Montreal and Singapore - Members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have signed a fintech co-operation agreement with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). The members are the securities regulatory authorities in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec and Saskatchewan. The agreement extends the work of the CSA Regulatory Sandbox Initiative and the MAS Fintech and Innovation Group. Notably, it includes a referral mechanism for innovative businesses, and will enhance and clearly define information-sharing between these jurisdictions. “This agreement with MAS will allow innovative businesses in Canada and Singapore access to new regulated markets,” said Louis Morisset, CSA Chair and President and CEO of the Autorité des marchés financiers. “Flexible regulatory environments with appropriate investor protection measures are best-placed to support the rapidly growing fintech industry.” “Singapore and Canada are no strangers in fintech collaboration. MAS and Bank of Canada had collaborated on a project to explore cross-border payments transactions on blockchain. This co-operation agreement will strengthen our co-operation between the 2 countries, specifically in developing innovative solutions for the securities sector,” said Sopnendu Mohanty, Chief FinTech Officer, MAS. The co-operation agreement exchange ceremony was held at the Canadian Pavilion ...
Read More
CSA enter - Not yet a done deal
Finextra | Nov 6, 2019 Non-banks now account for a quarter of the institutions offering payment services or payment instruments, up from 14% in only six years, according to a fresh batch of statistics from the Bank for International Settlements. The data comes from the Basle-based BIS's annual Red Book report on payments and financial infrastructures. It reveals increasing incursions by non-bank competitors into both retail and wholesale payments. "The traditional bank-based ecosystem is being disrupted from below by fintechs and from above by well established big techs," states the report. "When asked which financial products and services are most affected by technological developments and competition, banks often rank payments the highest - both today and over the next five years." Non-bank providers now account for 10% of direct participants in RTGS systems in jursidictions covered by the BIS-convened Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. In contrast, non-banks accounted for only four percent in 2012. The payments landscape continues to morph, says the BIS: "Driven by innovation and shifts in consumer preferences, new systems, new methods and new players are shaping the future of payments." The report also checks in on the drive towards a cashless society. It finds the ...
Read More
changing landscape payments - Not yet a done deal
CNBC | Jeff Cox | Nov 13, 2019 Key Points Google plans to offer checking accounts next year. The project, code-named Cache, will be run in conjunction with Citigroup and the Stanford Federal Credit Union. Google will offer checking accounts next year, according to a source familiar with the company’s plans, representing Big Tech’s boldest move yet into the consumer banking business. Most previous efforts have focused on credit cards and payment platforms. The accounts for the project will be run by Citigroup and the Stanford Federal Credit Union, the source said, confirming a report in The Wall Street Journal. As part of a project code-named Cache, the company will become the latest Silicon Valley leader to try its hand at the banking space. Previous attempts by Apple and Facebook faced obstacles, with consumers growing increasingly skeptical over providing large technology companies with their personal information. Google does not intend to sell customers’ data, Caesar Sengupta, an executive at the firm, told the Journal. “If we can help more people do more stuff in a digital way online, it’s good for the internet and good for us,” Sengupta said. For years, banks had been concerned about competition from small, nimble ...
Read More
big tech unable to self regulate - Not yet a done deal
11fs Pulse | Joanne Kumire | Aug 27, 2019 Introduction to Open Banking in the UK The first step towards banking automation came in 1967 following the installation of an ATM in the UK. Over 50 years later, Open Banking arrived, ushering in a new era of digital banking, which ironically is lessening the need for ATMs. It is no secret that the financial industry was in dire need of a makeover, I mean except for a few bankers (if that), no-one really understood how most of banking worked even though it plays an integral role in our everyday lives. The 2008 global financial crisis was evidence of that and this disaster led to a review of regulations, from which Open Banking – the first enactment of PSD2 – was birthed. Since January 2018, we have heard a lot about Open Banking, the regulation that has released the financial data of consumers from the banks’ ownership and into the hands of consumers. That means regulated banks in the UK are now required to let customers share their transaction data such as spending habits and regular payments with authorised third-party providers (TPPs) offering other services – as long as the customer ...
Read More
open banking 2 - Not yet a done deal
Artemis | Steve Evans | Nov 7, 2019 A blockchain based parametric weather insurance product has made its first payouts, after severe weather impacted smallholder farmers covered by the product in Sri Lanka. The parametric insurance was launched in a pilot phase a year ago, as Oxfam in Sri Lanka teamed up with insurance and reinsurance broker Aon and insurtech blockchain solutions provider Etherisc, alongside local insurer Sanasa, to deliver a responsive risk transfer solution that could be rolled out affordably in developing regions, with the goal of making automated payouts to smallholder farmers when extreme weather conditions occurred. The pilot launched with around 200 farmers enrolled that were exposed to the risk of losing their crops due to extreme weather. After the first year, the system has made some pay-outs to farmers in this initial operations phase, the parties behind the product announced. Now, the parties involved will move onto the next phase of the project as cropping season starts in November, seeking to solve any issues raised during the pilot with the goal of refining the system’s efficiency and increasing the scale the number of farmers that will benefit from the parametric microinsurance. “We are proud to have ...
Read More
blockchain use cases3 - Not yet a done deal
Mylo | Ted Liu | Nov 5, 2019 Mylo Raises $10M Series A From Major Canadian Financial Institutions Montreal, November 5, 2019 – Mylo, the Montreal-based fintech, has secured $10M in financing for its app that helps Canadians automate their saving and investing. The Series A round was led by National Bank’s corporate venture capital arm, NAventures, with follow-on investment from Desjardins Capital, Ferst Capital Partners and Tactico. This brings the company’s total funding up to $14M. “Mylo’s mission has always been to help Canadians achieve their financial goals. With over 450,000 Canadians creating accounts to save and invest on our platform in only two years, we know we’re on the right track,” said Mylo Founder and CEO, Phil Barrar. “This investment from important strategic partners lets us start the next phase of our mission. Our team is focused on building innovative new products to help Canadians overcome any financial roadblocks that stand in the way of their goals.” The investment by National Bank reinforces the institution’s commitment to innovation. “We see great alignment between Mylo’s mission and our own focus on providing individuals with the digital tools they need to manage their finances,” said Igal Ohayon, Director of Venture ...
Read More
mylo - Not yet a done deal
Osgoode Professional Development York University | Nov 2019 Strictly Legal, an Osgoode Professional Development podcast, is about all things legal. Each episode, we unpack current issues affecting the legal landscape with the help of some of the industry's leading thinkers. Heated fights over intellectual property are nothing new in promising technology markets. Are we poised for a revolution in the protection of all types of IP?  The blockchain can be used to control and track the distribution of protected IP.  Imagine a world where you could easily register and claim ownership over your original creative works – from music to photos to blogs. With the use of blockchain technology, that world is not so far away. As the world reacts to the current blockchain mania, many businesses in the community are having discussions on what the future of innovation in the blockchain space looks like. This week's guest: Paul Horbal, Bereskin Parr (@horbal) BIO:  Paul Horbal is a partner with Bereskin & Parr LLP. He is a member of the firm’s Electrical & Computer Technology group and is Chair of the Financial Technology group. His practice focuses on patent, industrial design and technology law, with an emphasis on securing and leveraging ...
Read More
OsgoodePD Podcast Strictly Legal - Not yet a done deal
Reuters | Sharon Lam | Nov 8, 2019 Recession gatecrashes Hong Kong’s fintech party HONG KONG (Reuters Breakingviews) - Hong Kong’s economic travails are an unwelcome guest in the city’s fintech party. Enthusiasm for online-only banks was palpable at the Fintech Week conference. Yet months of political unrest have hit small businesses, and the added risks may delay local launches by the likes of Standard Chartered and Tencent. Attendees this week descended on Hong Kong’s Lantau Island for the financial hub’s fourth annual gathering. With appearances from top officials like Financial Secretary Paul Chan to executives at Singapore’s $14 billion Grab and other rising stars, there was plenty of buzz. Hot topics included central bank digital currencies and cross-border payments. See:  News on China cryptocurrency and more reforms Virtual banks, as these branchless outfits are known in Hong Kong, took centre stage. Earlier this year, Hong Kong authorities granted eight licenses for such firms to offer payments, deposits and other services, in a long overdue shakeup. HSBC, Bank of China Hong Kong, Hang Seng Bank and Standard Chartered account for some three-quarters of the city’s mortgages and two-thirds of retail loans. Online challengers, including a joint venture between Chinese handset ...
Read More
HK - Not yet a done deal
TLT Solicitors | Daniel Lloyd | Sept 2019 Who is liable when AI goes wrong? Let us take the example of Tesla, whose vehicles have been involved in two similar fatal crashes since 2016. In both cases the vehicle failed to see a lorry cross its path and travelled into the lorry shearing off the top of the car, thereby causing both drivers to suffer fatal injuries. Should Tesla be liable for the crash? At what point should a driver no longer have any liability for what the car is doing? At the moment the Department of Transport in the USA adheres to the automation standards set out by the SAE which run from “level 0” (no automation) to “level 6” (full automation). It is accepted that Tesla’s Autopilot driverless software system is no more than a level 2 or 3 on this scale, both of which require the driver to remain in control of the vehicle when driving. So from a public law perspective at least, Tesla is not being held liable for the two crashes that occurred if, as appears to be the case, the drivers were not in control of the vehicles at the time they crashed ...
Read More
intellectual property and AI - Not yet a done deal