Global fintech and funding innovation ecosystem

Crowdfunding must ensure IP rights are not infringed

share save 171 16 - Crowdfunding must ensure IP rights are not infringed

Irish Times | Eoghan Doyle | December 1, 2014

Crowdfunding and IP1 300x182 - Crowdfunding must ensure IP rights are not infringedBusinesses need to research new projects to make sure they are legally secure

Crowdfunding as an alternative way of financing a business or project is growing rapidly both internationally and in Ireland. Globally the market is estimated to be worth $15 billion, representing a huge opportunity for up-and-coming businesses and platforms.

Crowdfunding allows a business to seek financial backing from the “crowd”, be it existing customers, investors or just random members of the public who like the idea or investment proposal on a website (known as crowdfunding platforms or portals).

An important issue for many crowdfunding campaigns is intellectual property (IP), that is, the bundle of rights enjoyed by a business for things such as brand names, inventions and software.

For many businesses in today’s digital age, intellectual property is what sets their offering apart from their competitors. Corporations go to huge expense in researching and developing their products and services and they seek to protect the output of that work by claiming certain rights, for example, by filing for a patent or registering a trade mark.

For companies posting their idea online, they need to be careful that they are not infringing third party IP rights and that they assess the IP that they may have created and make sure to protect that IP in advance of disclosing their product to the world. Disclosing an invention to the world can prevent an inventor from ever getting a patent on that invention, and the company itself would need to have done the necessary background checks to ensure the product is not already patented by a third party.

View:  Why should crowdfunding only be for startups?

Crowdfunding platforms also need to be conscious of the role they play in helping a business to promote their products and services, including the related IP rights.

Adequate screening

Earlier this year, news emerged about the settlement of a case between LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton and eBay Inc. A number of brands under the LVMH umbrella had sued eBay for allowing counterfeit goods to be sold on its website. The initial ruling against eBay was for nearly €40 million in damages, which was reduced to nearly €6 million on appeal. The parties later settled their dispute.

EBay had been found to be in breach of its duty of care in not providing adequate screening systems or general warnings, thereby not doing enough to prevent counterfeit goods to be marketed via the eBay website.

EBay had been acting as an internet service provider (ISP). Under the European Commission’s E-Commerce Directive there are certain exemptions for passive service providers that are merely conduits for content that appears on their site.

The French court of appeal in the eBay case case referred to a 2010 judgment in the “Google AdWords” case where the judge cited the E-Commerce Directive. The judge said the exemptions from liability for ISPs established in that directive covered only cases in which the activity of the ISP was “of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature” which implied the service provider “has neither knowledge of nor control over information which is transmitted or stored”.

View:  Do you Perform Basic Crowdfunding Campaign Due Diligence?

In applying this decision, the French court determined that due to the services provided by eBay, it did not play a passive role but that it was acting as a broker.

This case highlights important issues for crowdfunding platforms in the context of IP rights, for example what kind of checks should a crowdfunding platform have in place to make sure a business seeking funding on its site is not infringing third party IP rights.

IP rights

The eBay case suggests that where an ISP or crowdfunding platform goes beyond the mere passive role and is not merely a conduit for placing a funding request, it is open to challenges from third party IP rights holders who claim their IP rights are being infringed (as did the brands under the LVMH umbrella in suing eBay).

It could be difficult for platforms to argue that they are mere conduits, particularly when they take on an active role in placing a business on their site to look for finance. Platforms will often undertake background checks, verify information supplied by a business and screen the companies that wish to use their particular platform.

Continue to the full article --> here


NCFA logo 200 - Crowdfunding must ensure IP rights are not infringed

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada crowdfunding hub providing education, advocacy and networking opportunities in the rapidly evolving crowdfunding industry. NCFA Canada is a community-based, membership-driven entity that was formed at the grass roots level to fill a national need in the market place.  Join our growing network of industry stakeholders, fundraisers and investors. Learn more About Us | Support Canadian Crowdfunding.

share save 171 16 - Crowdfunding must ensure IP rights are not infringed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

17 + 12 =