Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
NCFA Canada via the CFA Institute | Posted on August 27, 2013
James Allen, CFA, head of capital markets policy at CFA Institute, interviews researcher Douglas Cumming, CFA, on whether companies listed on venture exchanges have greater reporting problems, instances of fraud, and other issues when compared with companies listed on more established securities exchanges.
Policy Perspectives
Source: CFA Institute
James Allen, CFA | Douglas Cumming, PhD, CFA
NCFA Canada has summarized key points of the interview below.
James Allen (JA): In part 3 of this discussion with Douglas Cumming about venture exchanges, we discuss the JOBS Act (Jumpstart Our Business Startup Act), which was passed in the United States in 2012. There are a number of provisions within the act that were designed for small companies to access the capital markets more easily, especially after the Tech bubble of early 2000's. In Europe, there is also a fairly significant push from the European Commission to address financing for small companies in hopes to jump-start their national economies as well. What kind of policy lessons did you take from this study that would be applicable for small and medium sized companies?
Douglas Cumming (DC): Great question. To address this, I'll first note some interesting facts about UK, where we find similar rates of fraud relative to Canada. In particular, fraud accounts for:
We are surprised about these results because they don't have the same fragmented regulatory structure as we do in Canada. The difference between the rates may be due to nominated advisors, who provide additional governance associated with companies going public. Other provisions to the JOBS Act that are widely discussed are efforts to allow crowdfunding, which is very different from traditional securities regulation. Equity crowdfunding (or investment crowdfunding) essentially allows issuers to raise capital without many of the normal disclosures associated with financing. The implications of this are quite significant - there may be tremendous benefits for companies that might otherwise have difficulty accessing capital markets.
Our observations in this paper shows that if these types of provisions for crowdfunding are allowed, there should be cost-effective governance standards put in place (as much as possible) on these companies to minimize any potential adverse consequences associated with crowdfunding. In certain European countries as well as Australia, equity crowdfunding is permitted, which has provided a significant source of data for our other works. (Doug has done other work in the area of crowdfunding, one of the most known being a research paper on demand-driven securities regulation and crowdfunding)
JA: Can you briefly summarize how these other equity crowdfunding efforts in Europe and Australia work? What kinds of investors are drawn to these types of funding mechanisms, and were you able to track how these companies performed once they have accessed these financial markets?
DC: Yes, we have recent data from an equity (investment) crowdfunding portal in Australia in which we look at the disclosures made by issuing companies, which are effectively voluntary in crowdfunding. The interesting thing we see is that the company's success in terms of money they were able to raise and speed with which they were able to raise money a second time is very much correlated with the disclosures they make. Investors are showing some discernment; people are paying attention and companies whose disclosures which provide some level of comfort are able to raise much more money and much more quickly than companies that don't make such disclosures.
JA: What kinds of information are we talking about with these disclosures? Are these regular updates of financial information or just general corporate information?
DC: Financial information is certainly part of it, such as financial disclosures and forecasts. We see that the use of disclaimers on forecasts or no financial forecasts at all may negatively impact a company's ability to raise money. We also observe that companies who are selling too much equity (such as with founders who aren't keeping their "skin in the game"), can be interpreted very negatively so investors are less likely to get involved, which is quite intuitive.
The other important thing we see is that if the issuing company has substantial or reputable board members, it significantly helpful for its efforts in is raising money. Also a route to liquidity, such as projected IPO exit dates, also likewise helps them raise more money in the future. Again, this is based on evidence from areas where equity crowdfunding platforms are permitted.
Another thing we saw is that if a company has a patent and it is disclosed, this type of signal does not necessarily help a company to raise more money or raise money quicker with crowdfunding. This is interesting, and we believe the reason for this is that if you are a startup with a patent, then you are likely to raise money in another way, such as venture capital financing. Raising money through crowdfunding may be a signal to investors that your startup was unable to attract funding through venture capital, so it doesn't help you in a crowdfunding context.
Source: CFA Institute
NCFA Canada by Sunny Shao | August 15, 2013
NCFA Advisor Sunny Shao talks to Ana Caracaleanu, CEO of Luevo and Jenny Tcharnaia, co-founder and CFO of TriMirror and NCFA Advisor about their fashion startups and how both crowdfunding and crowdsourcing trends have played a part in building their business.
Ana's background in the fashion industry helped her identify a gap in the marketplace for something like Kickstarter or Indiegogo, but specifically for the fashion industry. After completing her MBA in 2012, she decided to pursue her entrepreneurial dream and founded Luevo, a product-based crowdfunding platform that connects fashion designers directly with consumers. Luevo is currently in private beta and plans to launch in Fall 2013.
Jenny has a lot of experience with launching and successfully exiting startups. Her previous fashion businesses gave her a good understanding of building and growing social network communities, which provided a foundation for her most current project, TriMirror. TriMirror aims to solve the problem of trying on clothes for online shoppers by combining real-time 3D simulation technology with highly customized avatars to show how garments fit as users move. Jenny's existing social network communities became TriMirror's early adopters and product ambassadors.
Both startups have seen a lot of growth in the crowdfunding industry recently and even more potential for fashion designers, retailers, consumers and other industry partners to support one another. Ana, Jenny and Sunny are all excited to see what's on the horizon for crowdfunding in Canada.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFW7ofvGg-M[/youtube]
Luevo is the first product-based crowdfunding platform that connects independent fashion designers with consumers who want to be on the leading edge of fashion. On Luevo, you discover and pre-order high quality limited edition fashion goods you can't find anywhere else.
TriMirror provides real-time virtual fitting rooms to simplify the process of shopping. For fashion designers and retailers, TriMirror also offers 3D designer tools, in-store virtual try-on installations and ecommerce widgets.
The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada crowdfunding hub providing education, advocacy and networking opportunities in the rapidly evolving crowdfunding industry. NCFA Canada is a community-based, membership-driven entity that was formed at the grass roots level to fill a national need in the market place. Join our growing network of industry stakeholders, fundraisers and investors. Increase your organization's profile and gain access to a dynamic group of industry front runners. Learn more eBrochure | Prezi or contact us at casano@ncfacanada.org.
By JD Alois | August 1, 2013 @ 9:06 am
Our neighbors to the North while much smaller in population have already established a vibrant crowdfunding scene. With over 45% of the entire Canadian workforce employed in small business driving 28% of Canada’s GDP, it is clear that the importance of fostering a positive environment for entrepreneurs is vital for the Canadian economy.
Venture capital investments has recently seen an increase, but has not yet risen to the amount seen in 2000. It is also interesting to note that crowdfunding superstar Pebble Watch started in Waterloo, Ontario. University student Eric Migicovsky received accelerator funds but was unable to raise venture capital funds in Canada. Enter crowdfunding and Kickstarter.
Craig Asano, Founder and Executive Diretor of the National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada), is an entrepreneur and world traveler with great perspective – who understands the importance of crowdfunding and what this innovation can do for the economy of Canada. The NCFA was formed as a non-profit with the mandate to provide education, advocacy and to foster the growing crowdfunding industry. As a leading voice in the Canadian crowdfunding industry, Crowdfund Insider reached out to Craig for an update on crowdfunding in Canada today.
CFI: Please share how you became interested in Crowdfunding and how you decided to start the NCFA.
Craig: As an entrepreneur and intrepid international traveller of 15 years, I was constantly pursuing opportunities that would make a difference in this world. In October 2012, I saw crowdfunding as a multi-disciplinary activity that connected industries and organizations of different motivations together iterating at an exponential rate and packed in a strategic and social marketing wrapper. Crowdfunding was at the intersection of many of my personal interests including technology, finance, entrepreneurship and globalization. The advancements of technology were disrupting traditional industries, such as venture capital finance, and I wanted to be part of this great movement; one that supported collaboration, innovation and the development of crowdsourced principles. I saw it as a way to connect, problem solve, automate (the outdated), develop better products and right-sized solutions, cultivate shared values and build a sense of community – the way forward.
CFI: How many Crowdfunding platforms are currently operating in Canada? How many support companies? I believe you listed 45 in your directory.
Craig: NCFA Canada hosts a comprehensive list of Canadian Crowdfunding portals. As of July 2013, there are over 60 Crowdfunding portals + 8 providers operating in Canadian markets. Due to regulations, most of these portals are donation-reward based platforms however there are a few portals that are facilitating capital raising with an online presence that are operating under existing prospectus exemptions or that have been approved by the relevant commission.
CFI: What do you see as the NCFA’s most important role right now? Education? Being an industry advocate?
Craig: Being a community-based and membership driven non-profit organization, our mandate revolves around providing education, advocacy and business opportunities for our national membership. NCFA Canada has a number of exciting programs and initiaives that we are currently developing.
CFI: You list being active in reporting fraud. Please share your thoughts on Crowdfunding fraud and how you see the NCFA role evolving here.
Craig: NCFA Canada views Crowdfunding fraud as a collective challenge that can be overcome by having industry stakeholders, issuers, investors, government and academic partners come together to actively identify fraudulent activity and develop the appropriate safeguards to both protect and advance the industry. Central forums and data intelligence on fraudsters can be gathered and shared for the benefit of everyone involved.
We envision NCFA Canada’s role to contribute in a few ways:
(1) Establish a working committee that is entirely focused on fraud education, detection and prevention initiatives; (2) Work with the appropriate organizations to develop and distribute leading fraud detection solutions to market, and assist in educating industry participants on the benefits of using these services; and (3) Develop and distribute a national insurance program to protect industry participants that share group risk
CFI: Do you see Crowdfunding as the best vehicle to fill the funding gap for SMEs in Canada?
Craig: Yes, crowdfunding can be viewed as ‘additive’ and complementary to existing capital raising options and offers wide distribution, increased participation, and an increased pipeline and range of fundable projects/products. Is it enough to fill the entire gap? Possibly not, but it’s the way forward and path of choice during these turbulent times. Canadian SMEs need to tap into this unearthed potential that goes way beyond ‘funding’.
NCFA Canada views Crowdfunding as an efficient, effective and transparent way to assist SMEs to raise the much needed capital they require to innovate and grow their businesses. It also allows the wide public to participate in a range of projects and offerings that previously they had limited or no access to. Crowdfunding dollars can seed early stage ideas to the point that entrepreneurs and their businesses can clearly demonstrate traction and execution abilities to prospective angel and venture capital investment groups.
Crowdfunding is a tremendous opportunity for industry, government and academia to come together to create a marketplace for consumers and businesses to self-source, self-select and self-fund ideas and projects in a democratic, fair and social manner in support of innovation, entrepreneurship and job creation. The intangible benefits of Crowdfunding are hardly measurable given the infancy of the industry but they go far beyond the financial incentives and traditional funding mechanisms that may have created the funding bottleneck/gap in the first place.
CFI: How active have Venture Capitalists and Angels been in the past few years in supporting start ups in Canada?
Craig: In 2011-2012, Venture Capital activity rose to the highest dollar volume since 2007 (pre-recession) according to the CVCA with steady year over year growth in terms of the number and average size of deals.
CFI: Do many Canadian start ups migrate to other countries because of greater opportunity / access to capital?
Craig: Yes, many Canadian start-ups migrate to the US to access larger or differently structured capital markets (e.g., privatized health care in the US) and a more supportive entrepreneurial environment. One of the problems that Canada faces is the inability to cobble together enough funding and risk capital to commercialize its own technology, product innovations and even human capital resources. A classic Crowdfunding example is where Waterloo University student Eric Migicovsky, Founder of Pebble Watch, received accelerator funds to develop a prototype of his smart watch but was subsequently unable to raise venture capital funds in Canada. Not wanting to give up he moved to the valley and was introduced to Kickstarter where he went on to successfully raise $10 million in the US. “Innovation cannot be lost to a VC’s inbox. Innovation is too important for one man, or one firm, to pass judgment on.” – Eric Migicovsky, Creator, Pebble Watch
CFI: The regulatory environment in Canada is different from the United States as there is no single national regulator for Crowdfunding. Please explain how the regulatory structure operates.
Craig: One of the primary challenges is that Canada does not have a national regulatory body that regulates the securities industry across the country, such as the SEC in the United States. While the CSA (Canadian Securities Administration) is a working committee of the various commissions and tries to harmonize and regulate the Canadian securities industry, provincial regulators are able to set their own rules.
From a Crowdfunding perspective, donation/reward-based models are legally permitted in Canada while securities (equity/lending) are not. Note, there are occurrences of hybrid models such as income splitting (rev sharing) currently operating, too.
CFI: The OSC appears to be taking a lead role in equity Crowdfunding. What is the status of their process regarding exemptions for investment Crowdfunding?
Craig: Although the status of a possible securities-based Crowdfunding exemption in Canada is heating up and there is agreement that there is an SME ‘funding gap,’ there isn’t consensus among the commissions as to what the regulations should look like and varying opinions.
Some highlights to report:
- Last December 2012, the OSC who is taking a leading role in equity Crowdfunding regulations released a staff consultation paper (here) that proposed an equity Crowdfunding framework with issuer caps up to $1.5 million per 12 month period (with restrictions) and investor caps at $2,500 per deal up to a max of $10,000 per investor in any 12 month calendar period. The OSC consultation paper received over 100+ written responses that are all available on the OSC website for transparency (NCFA Canada’s response can be found here). Note: if you review the solicited feedback almost 95% of the written comments are pro-CF; while 5% are con-CF.
- Also last Dec 2012, CSA released a blanket order that relaxed some financial reporting requirements and are reviewing options under an existing OM exemption (view).
- Feb 2013, BC released a proposal to allow retail and accredited investors to raise up to $500k with investors capped at $2,000, some restrictions apply (e.g., exclusion of funds and real estate entities) (view).
- The exempt market in Ontario has grown tremendously and is now being scrutinized by regulators. In 2011, $28 billion was transacted in Ontario alone (excluding non-investment funds; $87 billion total distribution).
- On Jun 17, 2013, the OSC issued an exemptive relief order for MaRs VX to permit the sale of securities over the internet to AI investors for ‘social impact’ deals in Ontario only ($25-50k/year cap) – relief from KYC and Suitability (view)
- Jul 9, 2013, FCAA in Saskatchewan issued a new proposal for comment, which has been called ‘Crowdfunding lite’ (view).
CFI: There are some groups which appear to be against equity Crowdfunding like FAIR. Please explain their justification for opposing Crowdfunding.
Craig: FAIR’s primary objections with equity Crowdfunding seem to revolve around duly protecting investors only. This is a single mandate that is less broad than the dual mandate of the various commissions, which is to both (1) ensure efficient capital formation; while (2) protecting investors. Ultimately concerns are around suitable portal regulations, protecting investors who are assumed to be unable to protect themselves (so called unsophisticated) and unraveling the years of securities laws that have been built up in effort to assist SMEs who desperately need funds to innovate and create jobs.
CFI: Where do you see Crowdfunding going in Canada over the next few years?
Craig: Into outer space! Oh, I see we’ve already gone there view ……
NCFA Canada | July 24, 2013

NCFA Advisor Sunny Shao talks to Douglas Cumming, professor of finance and entrepreneurship at York University about his latest crowdfunding research paper Demand Driven Securities Regulation: Evidence from Crowdfunding, which examines survey data collected in the National Crowdfunding Survey in Canada in Q1 2013.
Topics covered include whether a race-to-the-top or race-to-the-bottom debate in a unique context of equity crowdfunding (investment crowdfunding, or crowdfund investing), in which agency problems are extreme, as well as other questions such as:
[youtube]http://youtu.be/smuu1aZTK1k[/youtube]
StartingTrends | By Jennifer posted on May 28, 2013
Recently, Starting Trends was granted an exclusive interview with the CEO of JOI Media, Brock Murray, to discuss the creation and launch of Katipult, a fully developed and customizable white-label crowdfunding platform.
The team at Starting Trends would like to personally thank Brock for taking the time out of his busy schedule to speak with us.
We hope you enjoy the interview and please feel free to comment below on the Katipult white-label crowdfunding platform.
Please tell us a bit about yourself including some of your background as well as your current role with JOI Media/Katipult.
As a Finance graduate, I spend a considerable amount of time working in capital markets as an Analyst for an equity research firm. I eventually decided to pursue more entrepreneurial ventures and directed my focus on JOI Media, a software development company. I am currently the Chief Executive Officer and I have the pleasure of working alongside a great leadership team to provide software solutions such as Katipult to our clients.
Please describe your Katipult software and tell us a bit about what it does.
Katipult is a white-label crowdfunding platform, meaning it is a fully developed turn-key solution for organizations looking to enter this market. Our product has all the necessary crowdfunding features ready-made and it can be customized to meet additional needs of any organization.
What was the main spark that inspired your team to create and launch Katipult.com?
Our team was introduced to the crowdfunding concept in 2008 when the major platforms of today, (Kickstarter, Indiegogo, Kiva). were in their infancy. We saw potential in the transparency and donor engagement aspects for charitable projects. We originally financed the development of Katipult as a community initiative, however when our client base expressed interest in owning their own company-branded crowdfunding platforms, we added the system to our software product line.
What separates your white label software from others that are available in the crowdfunding industry?
Katipult is a unique solution in that we offer on-premise deployment of our software through our software license agreement. We offer our clients ownership of a single, perpetual license which gives them full control over their product including hosting, maintenance, and upgrades.
Katipult is a product of JOI Media, a software development firm with a long track record and great client list.
Both of these aspects are very important to the stakeholders in our target segment.
How much time & planning went into creating your software?
The research and development on a software product never stops. Technologies keep changing and new Internet trends arrive: i.e., Social Media. We started planning development for Katipult in 2008 so we’ve been at it for a while.
What advice, (if any). would you personally give to those who are considering launching their own donation, reward and/or equity based funding portal in Canada or anywhere for that matter?
It’s hard to give general advice because it really depends who the management team or organization launching the platform is, but I would advise those looking to launch a funding portal to ensure they have a sustainable business model. For example, solely taking a percentage of funds raised from projects is a model I don’t believe is sustainable.
In your opinion, at this point how educated do you think fellow Canadians are overall when it comes to equity crowdfunding & crowdfunding in general?
I think crowdfunding is a relatively new term for fellow Canadians just like “social media” was a few years ago. That being said, the concept of crowdfunding isn’t new at all when it comes to capital markets and publicly traded companies. Equity crowdfunding is more complex so it requires organizations like the National Crowdfunding Association of Canada to educate and create awareness.
paidContent | By Mathew Ingram
We’ve written about projects like Matter, which used Kickstarter to fund the creation of a new magazine for science writing, and high-profile bloggers like Andrew Sullivan who go directly to readers for financial support — but could a relative unknown in a small town use crowdfunding to build a business covering city hall and other local news?
Joey Coleman says yes. He has done not one but two successful Indiegogo campaigns to raise money to cover his home town of Hamilton, Ontario in Canada, where he writes about everything from the local elections to fires and other breaking news.
In a multi-part podcast series leading up to our paidContent Live conference on April 17 in New York, we’ve been talking to people who are doing innovative things in media, and Joey Coleman is definitely one of those. He doesn’t have a background as a journalist — he is just a tech-savvy resident of a town where he believes that not enough is being done to cover local stories. After starting a blog and having a number of readers offer to pay him for his reporting, he decided to do some crowdfunding.
Alberta Primetime | April 16, 2013
On April 9, 2013 Alberta Primetime hosted a show called 'Creative ways to raise capital'. Marty Gunderson, a board member with the National Crowdfunding Association of Canada appeared on the show to discuss crowdfunding models, trends and how they can help local projects and businesses raise money in Alberta.
Websites like Kickstarter and Indiegogo are taking advantage of the organizing power of social media to get funding for special projects. Is crowdfunding a sustainable funding model that can work in Alberta?
We talk to Ken Bautista, from Startup Edmonton and Marty Gunderson, from the National Crowdfunding Association of Canada.
Alberta Primetime is a daily current affairs show airing weeknights from 7pm MST to 8pm MST. Airing across Alberta on CTV Two Alberta, Alberta Primetime drills through the surface of current issues to explore the ideas and concerns of Alberta’s real energy sector – its people...
Alberta Primetime can be seen on CTV Two Alberta on the following channels:
The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada is Canada’s Crowdfunding Advocate. Newly formed, dynamic and inclusive, NCFA Canada works closely with industry groups, government, academia, other business associations and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry and voice across Canada.
JOIN today and ‘stand out’ in the crowd. Download eBrochure to learn more…
Contact Us
Craig Asano, Executive Director
(416) 618-0254
casano@ncfacanada.org
ncfacanada.org