Category Archives: Equity Crowdfunding, Alternative Funding

FrontFundr kick-starts equity crowdfunding in B.C.

The Georgia Straight | Stephen Hui | July 2, 2015

FrontFundr and RentMoolaWhen Vancouver-based RentMoola Payment Solutions reached the stage where many technology startups would seek financing from venture capitalists, Patrick Postrehovsky and his team made the decision to try “untraditional” methods of raising money.

The CEO and cofounder of RentMoola told the Georgia Straight that, after tapping friends and family, the privately held company took advantage of securities regulations in British Columbia that permit it to sell shares to accredited and retail investors. Now, according to Postrehovsky, RentMoola is considering using new rules that allow startups to do equity crowdfunding—which is legal here but not in Ontario and the United States—to raise money in relatively small portions from a large number of people.

“Typically, if you’re going to raise capital, you go to your VC, you review term sheets,” Postrehovsky said in the Yaletown office of Silver Maple Ventures. “But the biggest reason why we didn’t want to do that, frankly, was the venture-capital term sheet is going to be very dilutive. They’re going to try to take control of your company, and we really didn’t want to do that for our team.”

Silver Maple is the company behind FrontFundr, a securities-crowdfunding portal that launched in May. RentMoola is one of three local startups hoping to raise capital on FrontFundr, which on June 18 became the first portal in Canada to use what’s known as the “startup crowdfunding exemption”.

Adopted by the B.C. Securities Commission and its counterparts in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia in May, the exemption allows early-stage companies headquartered in those jurisdictions to sell shares, convertible notes, or bonds to investors living in those six provinces via crowdfunding portals without filing a prospectus with their provincial regulator. Using the rules, a startup can raise up to $250,000 per crowdfunding campaign, with two of these permitted in a calendar year. An investor can contribute a maximum of $1,500 per campaign.

Related: 

“It allows the broader investor community access to early private companies, and historically that hasn’t been the case,” Sean Burke, chief financial officer for Silver Maple, told the Straight, seated across from Postrehovsky. “There’s been exemptions available that they could use to get that access, but really what our platform does—and the new crowdfunding exemption—is it facilitates the actual process of doing an online investment.”

Guusto Gifts, one of the startups on FrontFundr, is the first company to attempt to raise capital using the startup crowdfunding exemption. The gift-giving-app maker is seeking to sell three percent of its equity for $50,000 by August 14. The minimum investment is $500, and Guusto must raise at least $20,000 for its offering to close. Guusto aims to gain a further $250,000 from accredited investors (who include people who earn at least $200,000 a year, have at least $1 million in financial assets, or possess at least $5 million in net assets) via FrontFundr using other exemptions from the prospectus requirement.

Burke said that FrontFundr, which charges startups a commission if their campaign is successful, aims to become the Kickstarter of securities crowdfunding. He remarked that the startup crowdfunding exemption gives retail investors the opportunity to be like the venture capitalists on the reality-TV show Dragons’ Den. According to Burke, “crowdfinancing”—his preferred term for securities crowdfunding—rewards startups with more than cash.

“By having broader access, you have brand champions,” he said. “People who are invested into the company are your biggest supporters who are going out there and advocating for you, talking about your product.”

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Will Equity Crowdfunding Buyers Be Able to Sell Their Shares?

Entrepreneur | Scott Shane | June 30, 2015

Equity crowdfunding sharesNow that non-accredited investors can buy shares in private companies through equity crowdfunding platforms, many people eager to get in on the ground floor of high flying startups are considering making those investments. Before they cut a check, would-be investors should consider how they will get their money back out. It won’t be nearly as easy as putting it in.

Traditionally, the business angels and venture capitalists who invest in startup companies have achieved liquidity when the companies in which they invested were acquired or went public. Unfortunately, for non-accredited equity crowdfunders, there won’t be enough initial public offerings or acquisitions to provide all of the needed liquidity. Crowdfunding isn’t likely to boost the number of acquisitions or IPOs much in the short run. While more companies will receive investment, a similar number will exit.

Moreover, many of the companies that will seek investments from non-accredited investors won’t be the types that typically go public or get acquired. For investors in companies whose business models aren’t appropriate for an IPO or an acquisition, traditional methods of achieving liquidity will remain unavailable.

In their new book, Equity Crowdfunding for Investors: A Guide to the Risks, Returns, Regulations, Funding Portals, Due Diligence, and Deal Terms, crowdfunding experts David Freedman and Matthew Nutting suggest that strategic and institutional investors might become buyers of the crowdfunders’ shares. But, as these authors rightly point out, these investors are unlikely to provide much of a market. Strategic and institutional investors finance a small minority of businesses that were previously backed by business angels and entrepreneurs’ friends and family. Because strategic and institutional investors’ decisions are driven by the characteristics of the companies seeking funding and not the characteristics of the earlier investors, equity crowdfunding is unlikely to change the number of institutional and strategic investors buying shares in private companies.

See:

Freedman and Nutting suggest that other non-accredited investors who were previously unaware of the investment opportunities, or who were limited by capital or regulations from making investments earlier might buy the crowdfunders’ shares. However, as the authors explain, that is unlikely to happen until the startups themselves are no longer seeking investment through crowdfunding.  As long the companies are still raising money, new investors might find it easier and cheaper to buy shares from the companies themselves rather than from earlier investors.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

SeedUps Canada is Self-Crowdfunding as Market Heats Up Around the World

Crowdfund Insider | | Jun 29, 2015

Seedups CanadaSeedUps Canada, a leading equity crowdfunding platform operating out of Calgary, is joining a growing number of platforms that are leveraging their own technology to self-crowdfund their company. SeedUps is reaching out to their growing number of users, and beyond, to capitalize on their first mover status in Canada.  The capital injection will help SeedUps to educate both investors, and entrepreneurs, about the opportunity of crowdfunding and drive future growth as they seek to disrupt traditional finance.

SeedUps would like to raise up to $500,000.  They see this amount as necessary for their “runway” to execute and recruit solid talent over the coming months. This would be a seed crowdfunding round with an A round to follow – perhaps next year. The seed round may come in around 20% equity – a solid amount of ownership to back the future of finance in Canada.

As part of their growth strategy, SeedUps wants to engage early stage investors like Angels – not supplant them.  The platform wants to collaborate with established early stage types – a phenomena that has growing traction globally. Sandi Gilbert, the CEO and co-founder of SeedUps, notes that in the last year or so traditional early stage investors like VCs and Angels have experienced a change of heart. They used to say “hey we don’t need these guys [equity crowdfunding platforms]” today they are recognizing this really makes sense.

The Canadian regulatory environment has proceeded in a bit of a convoluted fashion (not necessarily atypical – just look at the US). But last month, on May 14th, things changed in Canada as multiple provincial regulators moved in concert to improve the environment for access to capital.

View:  Syndicate Room raises £1.2m in 33 hours

Gilbert provided some insight into their world;

“For the last 18 months, we’ve been educating Canadians on the merits of equity crowdfunding and raising capital for companies profiled on our platform. It’s a new world for early stage companies seeking capital, but it has taken a while to gain main stream adoption. On May 14th, everything changed, as six Canadian provinces endorsed equity crowdfunding by implementing rules that make it easier for early stage companies to raise capital and opening up the opportunity for the ordinary investor to participate alongside seasoned investors in private capital deals. And, there is more change coming when Ontario opens up its market later this year.”

With the enactment of new rules, SeedUps believes now is the time to seize the moment and move forward aggressively.  Gilbert states;

“We launched in 2014 and [have been] credited with the “First Ordinary Investor”, we believe that now is the time to raise capital to take advantage of developments in the marketplace. This is the first time SeedUps has reached out for external financing, but our peer group has been active globally.”

 

Continue to the full article --> here

 

CF2015 Industry Report

GET the 2015 Massolution Global Industry Report --> Now

 NCFA Members Get 25% Discount Code = NCFAC100

Report Forecasts Total Global Crowdfunding to Reach $34.4 Billion in 2015

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Crowdfunding Just Got More Exciting With SEC Regulation A+: Elio Motors Leads Pack

Forbes | TJ McCue | June 19, 2015

Elio motors Reg A+ crowdfunding

Kickstarter partly created the crowdfunding phenomenon that many product designers, inventors, and startups love. This trend of offering a soon-to-be-made product to the crowd, or consumers at large, continues to take the world by storm. The wind behind crowdfunding is about to get stronger with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation A+ opening for business today.

The SEC adopted the new ruling in late March, according to my Forbes contributor colleague, Michael Raneri, with his post: Testing the Waters WAT +0.56%: Filing a Regulation A+ Offering with the SEC (linked at left or below, depending on how you are viewing this article); the final rules become operational today.

Elio Motors, the maker of a new ultra-efficient vehicle, is one of the first to launch a “Regulation A+” crowd-funding initiative as the next phase of its fundraising strategy. Elio Motors is targeting the first half of 2016 to launch an enclosed three-wheel ultra-high-mileage vehicle that is expected to sell for $6,800 and get up to 84 MPG. The vehicle already is a hit with consumers, as more than 43,000 people have reserved a place in line to purchase a vehicle. With 250,000+ likes on their Facebook page, it certainly appears that they have a strong chance at success, crowdfunding or not.

View:

The company chose to use a new crowdfunding platform, StartEngine, to make this Regulation A+ offering. The process is not the same as a traditional crowdfunding campaign and StartEngine has the campaign running. Click through to page 2 for rough costs after “testing the waters.”

As someone who follows and writes about the maker movement and bringing manufacturing back to America, I found the Elio Motors work to be inspiring. Elio Motors will manufacture the vehicle in Shreveport, Louisiana, at a former General Motors GM +0.39% facility that made vehicles such as the Hummer H3 and Chevy Colorado. To produce an ultra-high-mileage vehicle in the former Hummer H3 factory is, to say the least, ironic.

When the Elio goes to market, it will create 1,500 jobs at the facility. In addition, the Elio will use 90 percent North American parts and materials, creating another 1,500 jobs at its supplier partner companies. These manufacturing jobs will in turn create approximately 18,000 indirect jobs across the country. That’s enough to make the Elio Motors P5 vehicle a very desirable crowdfunding purchase and investment, above and beyond its low cost and high mileage.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Regulation A+: What Do Industry Leaders Think About The New Investment Crowdfunding Exemption

Crowdfund Insider | By | June 19, 2015

Reg A+ industry insider commentsTitle IV of the JOBS Act finally become an actionable exemption today.  Rules 251 through 263 of Regulation A, under the Securities Act of 1933, were amended in an effort to fix a previously untenable securities rule.  Reg A+, as it is commonly known, has been described as a “Mini-IPO”.  Issuers may raise up to $50 million in securities which are freely transferable.  Reg A+ securities are not limited to accredited investors thus opening up opportunity for any investor to participate in an early stage investment.

Many crowdfunding platforms have indicated their interest in using the new exemption. Others have taken a wait-and-see approach.  The truth  will be revealed in the coming months as the results of the new rules will be tallied to see if Congress, and the SEC, accomplished their shared goal of facilitating access to capital.

But what are industry leaders saying on the day of Reg A+?  Crowdfund Insider reached out to several prominent industry participants and observers to hear their point of view.

Sam Guzik Washington DCSam Guzik, CFPA Chair, Securities Attorney and Crowdfund Insider Senior Contributor, has been a longstanding proponent of Reg A+. Sam heralded the arrival of Title IV, but cautioned on potential challenges;

“June 19 marks the beginning of a new era for small business capital formation. Any company willing to spend $100,000 or so, including fees to prepare audited financial statements, will have the opportunity to sell securities to the general public under this new regulation – allowing a private company to complete a “Mini IPO” and operate as a public company at a much reduced cost, both in terms of management time and dollars. The real challenge will be finding investors willing to invest in these companies. Many are expected to attempt an IPO without the assistance of a broker or investment banker, relying on Internet solicitation and social media –  the large majority of these companies going it alone will face a difficult time achieving their funding goals – especially those with little or no track record.”

“However, for those companies who are uncertain as to whether there will be sufficient investor interest to justify the time and expense of filing a Regulation A+ offering with the SEC, they will now be able to “test the waters” – publicly solicit non-binding indications of interest, before making any filings with the SEC.”

“And perhaps most exciting: statistically a large percentage of IPO offering proceeds is immediately put to use for new hires – a huge benefit to this country’s economy that no one can quarrel with.”

View:

Fundrise Ben MillerOld Reg A was a lightly utilized method of raising capital. Saddled by state Blue Sky Review, something only the very determined sought to tackle, the cost and associated time was the death knell of the former exemption.

One prominent crowdfunding platform actually pushed through several offers before moving on to Reg D.  Fundrise, a real estate crowdfunding platform, was co-founded by Ben Miller.  He lauds the new exemption but views it as not the best option for his type of platform;

“While Regulation A+ does not seem particularly applicable for a real estate deal, since it took us more than 6 months to get cleared each of the three times we’ve used Regulation A and quality real estate companies need more expedient funding, we are excited to see the SEC progress in democratizing capital markets. There are many medium-sized businesses, such as biotech or manufacturing companies, that will soon be able to access a new source for funding and we look forward to increased financial innovation to come.”

Continue to the full article --> here

 

CF2015 Industry Report

GET the 2015 Massolution Global Industry Report --> Now

 NCFA Members Get 25% Discount Code = NCFAC100

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

SEC Reg A+ Will Now Let You Crowdfund Equity

TechCrunch | | June 19, 2015

Crowdfunding Reg A+Crowdfunding just got a little bit more interesting. According to SEC Regulation A+, as of today companies can secure funding via crowdfunding provided they are compliant with a set of very specific laws and standards.

“These new rules provide an effective, workable path to raising capital that also provides strong investor protections,” said SEC Chair Mary Jo White in a release dated March 25, 2015. “It is important for the Commission to continue to look for ways that our rules can facilitate capital-raising by smaller companies.”

According to the SEC there are two tiers to the new regulation: Tier 1 “for offerings of securities of up to $20 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $6 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer” and Tier 2 “for offerings of securities of up to $50 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $15 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer.” Both require similar requirements but Tier 2 investment requires further disclosure.

Slava Rubin, CEO of Indiegogo, has been watching the regulation for while and is excited about the possibilities.

“We’re encouraged by the SEC’s new equity crowdfunding regulations,” he said. “They enable startups and small businesses to secure additional funding, while providing strong investor protection. We will continue to explore how equity crowdfunding may play a role in our business model.”

View:  

The Reg A+ Bombshell: $50M Unaccredited Equity Crowdfunding Title IV takes Center Stage

What do industry leaders think about the new investment crowdfunding exemption (Reg A+ in the US)

How does the system work? After doing due diligence with a securities attorney this new regulation allows you to “test” the equity sale by running a Kickstarter-like campaign. This allows potential investors to express interest but not purchase the securities – in short you’re gathering a mailing list of potential small investors. Once you’ve collected the list you can begin to sell the equity to those investors using a licensed broker dealer.

Because you’re not actually selling during your campaign this is a sort of Kickstarter-lite – it allows you to get the word out and drum up interest while keeping on the right side of the law. A clever marketer, however, can see the intrinsic value of this play.

Similar regulations are in the works in the UK and Europe and it will fascinating to watch how companies begin using this equity crowdfunding to bypass the world of standard investment. You can read the entire SEC release below.

FACT SHEET

Regulation A+

SEC Open Meeting

March 25, 2015

Highlights of the Final Rules

The final rules, often referred to as Regulation A+, would implement Title IV of the JOBS Act and provide for two tiers of offerings:

Tier 1, which would consist of securities offerings of up to $20 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $6 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer.
Tier 2, which would consist of securities offerings of up to $50 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $15 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer.
In addition to the limits on secondary sales by affiliates, the rules also limit sales by all selling security-holders to no more than 30 percent of a particular offering in the issuer’s initial Regulation A offering and subsequent Regulation A offerings for the first 12 months following the initial offering.

For offerings of up to $20 million, the issuer could elect whether to proceed under Tier 1 or Tier 2. Both tiers would be subject to basic requirements as to issuer eligibility, disclosure, and other matters, drawn from the current provisions of Regulation A. Both tiers would also permit companies to submit draft offering statements for non‑public review by Commission staff before filing, permit the continued use of solicitation materials after filing the offering statement, require the electronic filing of offering materials and otherwise align Regulation A with current practice for registered offerings.

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Securities Crowdfunding Breakthrough

NCFA Canada - About Us | Richard Remillard | June 11, 2015

Breakthrough

On May 14, six Canadian provincial securities commissions smartly moved to the forefront of debt and equity crowdfunding in North America by issuing the rules under which start up and early-stage companies can tap this new source of capital via funding portals.

These rules are in force for five years, up to May 13, 2020 at which time, presumably, the experience of the preceding five-year period will be assessed and a decision made to continue, continue but modify or discontinue the initiative.

Those six are: British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Québec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. They have each committed to allowing individual investors in their own provinces to put a maximum of CAD $ 1,500 per distribution into those companies. Issuers are allowed up to CAD $250,000 per distribution, with two distributions per year permitted. And, there is a dealer registration exemption for persons seeking to operate a funding portal.

The rules (eg., see BC 45-316 Start-up Crowdfunding Registration and Prospectus Exemptions [Multilateral CSA Notice]) come ring-fenced with constraints that apply to the issuers and the funding portals along with considerable investor protection measures.

For instance, the issuer must be a non-reporting issuer and cannot be an investment fund. As well, the issuer’s head office must be in one of the participating jurisdictions. And, the issuer will need to provide an offering document using a required form. However, the issuer will not have to provide investors with financial statements either at the point of sale or on an ongoing basis. And, none of the promoters, directors, officers and control persons of an issuer can be a principal of a funding portal that is used to raise funds for that issuer. A funding portal’s head office needs to be in Canada and the majority of its directors must be Canadian residents. A funding portal cannot provide advice to an investor or recommend a security or receive a commission or fee from an investor. Finally, an investor has the right of withdrawal as long as that right is activated within 48 hours of subscription to the offering.

Why Now and What’s Next?

Why have these provincial securities regulators acted? Partly, it’s the dearth of capital from other sources of supply of early stage company financing particularly in those areas of the country that are relatively underserved. For instance, the Canadian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association reported that $338 million of $362 million, or 93%, of venture investments occurred in only three provinces in Q 1 of 2015. Ontario alone received $237 million in investing dollars in Q 1, or 65% of the total for the country, while Nova Scotia firms managed to attract only $14 million, or 2.2% in that same period.

In addition, this action by the Group of Six is recognition that investor appetite may be significant given that Canada is in the top ten countries for broadband internet penetration. Canada also has a deep pool of investors with a long tradition of backing early-stage firms in mining and oil and gas exploration. So, it is no surprise that crowdfunding has elicited huge interest in Canada. One only has to look at the overflow crowds attending introductory conferences and seminars put on by the National Crowdfunding Association of Canada.

In the short time that has elapsed since the six regulators acted, companies and investors are already moving to take advantage of the new freedom. For instance, a crowdfinancing firm in Vancouver is already reporting on the progress made by several companies towards achieving their fund raising targets with one reaching 33% of its goal in less than two weeks. But, it’s early days yet and crowdfunding participants are adjusting to the new opportunities that opened up with last month’s announcement.

Over the longer term, it is quite likely that levels of funding activity we will see in the next six to nine months in those provinces will jump. Canadian public policy has put a premium on spurring new company formation as incubators and accelerators have sprung up like mushrooms across the country.

View:  Trends show crowdfunding to surpass vc in 2016

All attention is now focused on Alberta and Ontario and what their crowdfunding plans might be going forward. Alberta has recently had a provincial election that resulted in the longstanding party in power being unceremoniously tossed out. One of the new government’s early decisions will be to name a new head of the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC). So, it’s not surprising that Alberta has lagged.

In Ontario, It’s likely that the actions of the six provincial regulators will prompt the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) to speed up its own deliberations. Prior to May 14, officials had said that the OSC would release its own amended proposals in the fall of 2015.

The OSC had already indicated in its opinion funding portals would need to be registered while investor and issuer limits could be raised to, respectively, CAD $2,500 per investor per investment with a CAD $10,000 per year maximum and an annual company raise of a maximum of CAD $1.5 million.

Interestingly, the six provinces that have already moved to permit securities crowdfunding have committed to working on an ‘integrated crowdfunding exemption’ together with the OSC. And, higher investing and offering limits as envisaged by the OSC could even co-existing with, and complement, those announced in mid-May.

What Crowdfunding Means for Politics and for Capital Providers

Despite the protections built in by the six securities regulators, there are those who don’t believe that people can be trusted with their money and who will still try to rob crowdfunding of its potential. They will continue to push regulators to tighten the rules in the name of investor protection. However, these naysayers will likely lose out to a coalition of financial libertarians, for whom people should be free to decide what to do with their money, and entrepreneurs and investors. Entrepreneurs feel the pinch of the capital shortage facing early-stage firms once they exhaust the family and friends route while investors have become increasingly fed up with the performance and prospects of securities on offer in public markets and who are actively looking for greater exposure to private market alternatives, much as the largest institutional investors in the country are already doing.

View:

Securities crowdfunding has also stoked the fires of debate around where it fits in relation to angels and domestic venture capitalists. Is crowdfunding the new competitor on the block? Or, will it turn into a venue for collaboration wherein angels and venture capitalists partner with successfully-crowdfunded enterprises to taken them to the next stages of growth? In short, is crowdfunding a potentially disruptive threat or a massive opportunity for the established suppliers of capital? Time will tell but there are already indications of crowdfunding organizations partnering with these capital providers to the mutual benefit of one another.

And, the reality is that the early-stage company financing market is so large that there will be more than ample room for all.

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country.  NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1100+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada.  Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.