Category Archives: Equity Crowdfunding, Alternative Funding

Alternative Finance: Four Ways To Fund Your Business

MinuteHack | By Sharon Argov | Dec 14, 2015

Alternative finance optionsThe alternative finance industry has developed rapidly in recent years, the variety of offerings and the companies operating in the space has become so much more sophisticated. Yet many small business owners are either completely unaware of the plethora of options available to them, beyond their bank, or they’re left baffled by the sheer volume of alternative financing options out there.

According to GLI Finance, a lack of understanding about funding for small businesses could fuel a £20 billion black hole in the UK economy by 2020.

For that reason, it is imperative that small businesses get to grips with the industry and think beyond the traditional bank when it comes to financing their business ventures. Plus, alternative finance can offer a funding lifeline for small businesses seeking urgent funding that the banks refuse - it can potentially salvage a business from demise.

See:  Uber Banking: Fintech Aims to Revolutionize Financial Services in Canada

There are many reasons that a small business may be seeking help with funding. If you have ever struggled with late payments, needed extra capital to fuel growth or had to refinance your debts, you’ll appreciate the problems that alternative finance can solve for your business.

A deep dive of our own data earlier this year revealed that most businesses (36%) are looking for funding for expansion and growth which is encouraging to see. Only 4% of the businesses that used Fundbird did so for refinancing debt.

Believe it or not there is a funding solution out there for all businesses, no matter how big or small the business and no matter the problem you need to overcome. The following alternative finance solutions are just some of the options out there that small businesses could consider. Generally speaking, each solution suits a particular business issue.

Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding is probably the most well-known form of alternative finance, there are hundreds of platforms available to UK businesses and the number is continuing to grow.  In the UK we can benefit from both equity and rewards based crowdfunding models.

2015 Canadian Crowdfunding Directory (Platforms and providers)

Most people will be familiar with Kickstarter and Indiegogo, rewards based platforms well-known for funding hardware products and films, if you use one of these platforms you will need to give away a ‘reward’ in return for an investment from an individual.

Synonymous with the UK market is equity based crowdfunding – this is unavailable in the US – and largely the most popular for small business owners. The likes of Crowdcube are driving growth in equity crowdfunding, selling shares for as little as £10 per investor.

But be aware that this involves giving away equity in your business, think carefully about whether you are happy to do this. If you have an idea that you would like to get going with, or you are looking to launch your business, crowdfunding is the best option for you.

Peer to peer lending

P2P lending enables SMEs to borrow directly from other organisations and individuals, whether this is from a private lender or institutional money. To facilitate this, P2P lending platforms have arisen such as the likes of Lending Loop, Zopa, Ratesetter or Funding Circle to name a few.

Essentially they operate like a matchmaker between people who have savings that they are willing to invest for a better, long-term return and those who need to borrow. The best thing about P2P on both sides is the rates, by cutting out the bank the rate is often lower for the borrower and higher for the saver/investor.NCFA interviews Lending Loop

Interview: Canada’s P2P Small Business Marketplace, Lending Loop, Gains Traction

If you have an established business plan then P2P is a good bet, you’ll be able to secure the funds quickly but for that reason you need to be able to prove the viability of the business.

Invoice Financing

Invoice financing is where a third party agrees to buy your unpaid invoices for a fee. Invoice financing is perfect for businesses that need to boost cash flow very quickly. In the UK there are two types of invoice financing – factoring and invoice discounting.

If you decide to use factoring your invoices are managed by an invoice financier, who manages your sales ledger and collects money from your customers directly, so your customers will be aware you are using this method of financing.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

How 3 Generations of Investors can Impact the Future of Regulated Crowdfunding

Huff Post Business | LDJ Capital | Dec 11, 2015

Millennials at workThe recently approved Title III rules of the Jumpstart our Business Startups (JOBS) Act by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), now alternately referred to as Regulated Crowdfunding or Investment Crowdfunding, has been greeted with high expectations in the U.S. crowdfunding industry. Most industry stakeholders - including myself - are envisioning the industry to flourish as a result of a more democratized environment characterized by the participation of non-accredited investors. Nonetheless, I believe that by examining the demographic composition and the age distribution of the U.S. population we can gain insight into, and more accurately predict, its likely impact on the country's capital formation landscape - at least in the near future. The 3 major age groups capable of influencing investment activities in the U.S. are the Boomers, the Gen X and the Millennials.

Representing the individuals born between 1946 and 1964, the 75 million baby boomer generation currently account for about 70% of the total household wealth in the U.S. According to J.P Morgan report, this generation holds non-financial assets, particularly residential properties, that is about two-thirds or 75 percent of total household assets in 2013. Financial assets only account for just one-fifth or 20 percent of total assets. This means that the boomers will need to increase their financial assets in order to sustain the expected increase in their consumption expenditures during retirement.

Online private investing, powered by equity and debt crowdfunding platforms, has recently become the latest trend in capital formation. While thousands of accredited investors have earned decent returns by investing online through crowdfunding platforms, the regulatory environment was not favorable towards millions of non-accredited investors barred from participating in online investing.

A potential industry game changer occurred on the 30th of October 2015 when the SEC released the much anticipated Title III of the JOBS Act which is meant to facilitate the participation of non-accredited investors in crowdfunding.

Thus, the boomers now have access to a democratized means of investing. While the boomers generally control substantial assets, wealth distribution within the generation is highly skewed as more than two-thirds of the generation's wealth is held by the wealthiest 10 percent.

Baby boomers can either increase or share their financial assets by funding a SPPICE (service, product, project, investment, cause or experience) through crowdfunding. Using regulated crowdfunding gives them the privilege of owning equity or stakes in startups and projects. Boomers have, over the years, accumulated most of their financial assets in retirement accounts and pooled investment funds which have earned them decent returns. However, by investing through equity and debt crowdfunding platforms, they can increase their financial assets and earn higher returns at the same time. Most crowdfunding platforms offer returns on investment averaging 10-14 percent, well above the rates in traditional investment vehicles they've been used to.

See:

In line with basic economics principles, it is expected that boomers become more risk averse as they approach retirement. They will prefer to place their wealth in less-risky asset classes, and make investments that get the most cash flow rather than capital growth. For this reason, real estate crowdfunding should pique their interest since a substantial part of their assets is presently held in residential properties, with real estate being a less volatile asset class. They should also be more likely to invest in debt deals which are less risky than equity deals. They might be invest more on residential fix and flip properties which guarantee a constant cash flow, rather than commercial properties that offer capital growth.

It t is not surprising that the younger generation (Gen X and the Millennial) have a lesser share of household wealth in relation to the boomers since they are just entering their prime earning years. However, these younger generation fall short of the benchmark set by the boomers when they were at the same age. In essence, at their present rate of wealth accumulation, most of the younger generation will be unable to enter retirement with a high level of acquired assets as that of the boomers. As a result, they need to develop strategies to grow their wealth considering their poorly performing income and low savings growth rate.

Gen X and the Millennials can adopt two strategies to achieve this goal. First, by increasing the returns on their investments or assets. Second,by intergenerational transfer of wealth, from the boomers to the gen X/millennials. Both strategies can be achieved through crowdfunding.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Webinar (Jan 19, 2016): The New Equity Crowdfunding Regime – Are You Ready?

Osgoode Professional Development | December 9, 2015

pic21945


Webinar (eligible for CPD credit hours) hosted by Osgoode Professional Development

Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Time: 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM


New equity crowdfunding rules set to come into force on January 25, 2016.  Are you ready?

The crowdfunding landscape in Canada is changing rapidly. With the OSC’s introduction of the new Multilateral Instrument 45-108: Crowdfunding, Ontario will soon join other provinces in the implementation of a new equity crowdfunding regime.

In this 75 minute OsgoodePD webinar, an outstanding faculty of legal and industry experts will guide you through the key elements of the new equity crowdfunding rules. Whether you are advising or working for a company that relies upon crowdfunding, or are an angel investor or portal operator, take advantage of this opportunity to get up to speed on the new equity crowdfunding regime and become better equipped to maximize the benefits of this new fundraising tool.

This dynamic and informative discussion will provide practical insight on:

  • Overview of the new equity crowdfunding regime (MI 45-108), and the impact on portal operators, businesses and investors
  • Interplay between existing and new prospectus exemptions typically used for crowdfunding, including the Accredited Investor, Offering Memorandum and new Crowdfunding exemptions
  • The crowdfunding landscape across Canada – how will it change with the new regime?
  • Strategies for navigating the patchwork of provincial crowdfunding rules
  • Identifying, avoiding and mitigating the risks when raising capital through equity crowdfunding
  • Special issues affecting platform and portal operators, including compliance best practices  for effective due diligence on companies and investors
  • Who’s watching? How compliance will be monitored in the new regime

Top legal and industry experts with hands-on crowdfunding experience will take you through everything you need to know to advise on and comply with the new equity crowdfunding regime.

Who Should Attend:

  • General corporate/business lawyers
  • Securities lawyers
  • In-house counsel
  • Crowdfunding portal/platform operators
  • Executives at start-ups
  • Entrepreneurs seeking to raise capital
  • Investors and venture capital groups

Moderator

Panelists

>>> Register Now <<<

Enter Code "NCFA" and Receive a FREE Digital Download:  July 28, Equity Crowdfunding Bootcamp Video <<<

 


Selz coverTo claim your free recording of NCFA's Equity Crowdfunding Bootcamp hosted on July 28, 2015:

  1.  Please be sure to apply the code "NCFA" when registering for the The New Equity Crowdfunding Regime webinar hosted by Osgoode Professional Development.
  2. Once registered, please forward your confirmed registration email to info@ncfacanada.org and request the free 'Jul 28 Equity Crowdfunding Bootcamp' discount code.

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

The Current State of US Reg A+ Investment Crowdfunding

CrowdExpert | | Nov 2015

Elio motors Reg A+ crowdfunding - screen shotEquity Crowdfunding With Reg A+ is Now In Effect

While Title III Equity Crowdfunding will open up the opportunity for many early stage startups to raise up to one million dollars using online crowdfunding platforms, Regulation A+ which went into effect June 19th 2015 allows medium sized companies to raise up to $50 million online.

Reg A+, as a quick refresher, is a new set of SEC rules which allow private companies a streamlined process to raise money from investors. Title IV of the JOBS Act reformed the old Regulation A exemption by splitting it into two tiers: Tier 1 allows companies to raise up to $20 million in any 12-month period with minimal ongoing SEC reporting requirements, but with the offering subject to “blue sky” state securities laws, requiring the issuer to register and comply with different regulations in each state they offer securities in. Whereas Tier 2 allows companies to raise up to $50 million and is exempt from blue sky regulation, but does add ongoing SEC reporting requirements. Both tiers of Reg A+ permit testing-of-the-waters, confidential filing of the offering statement, general solicitation, sales to unaccredited investors, and can also be potentially exempt from the shareholder limitations under the Exchange Act.

See:  The Reg A+ Bombshell: $50M Unaccredited Equity Crowdfunding Title IV takes Center Stage

So now that Reg A+ has been in effect over the summer and half the fall, what trends are we seeing in its use? What kinds of companies are taking advantage of the new regulations? How are funding platforms facilitating Reg A+ offerings? And how, if at all, is the Main Street, unaccredited investor taking advantage of Reg A+?

Too Early to the Party?

Unfortunately, even with the benefit of several months we have not yet seen an outpouring of Reg A+ offerings. The biggest reason is that it takes 4-8 months to get complex regulatory filings, such as those required by Reg A+, through the SEC (not to mention state filings if proceeding under Tier I). Even those Reg A+ offerings that have gone past the testing-the-waters phase are suspected to have begun the filing process back under the old Reg A regime in order to get the filings approved by the SEC in time to take advantage of Reg A+ as soon as it came into effect.

In a keynote address  on Oct 28th 2015 SEC Chairman Chair Mary Jo White gave us the following update:

As for Regulation A+, which just became effective in June, it is obviously too early to draw conclusions. Companies are beginning to take advantage of the new rules in greater numbers than was the case under the prior version of the exemption, with approximately 34 companies publicly filing offering statements and 16 companies filing non-public draft offering statements. The staff has qualified three offerings so far, and it remains to be seen how investors will react to such offerings.
– SEC Chairman Chair Mary Jo White

So that’s it, only 3 offerings qualified so far. We’re just getting started.

We spoke to one of our favorite experts in the Investment Crowdfunding space, Sara Hanks, CEO at CrowdCheck, a provider of due diligence services for crowdfunding platforms, for her perspective:

“It takes time to put together an SEC filing. Even though the Form 1-A is simple compared to a full SEC registration, it’s still a grown-up SEC filing with all the SEC rules. Additionally, securities lawyers are some of the most conservative creatures on the planet. I hear that a lot of them are dissuading their clients from using Reg A until they see what the market looks like.”
– Sara Hanks, CEO @ CrowdCheck

June 19th was about 4 months ago, so given the 4-8 month estimate of filing time, we should be seeing the rest of the first round of Reg A+ offerings open for investment coming online between now and February 2016. If those work out, then there will likely be a second wave mid-next-year.

Consumer products and consumer-facing companies are expected to be big users of Reg A+ once the process is more established. Evangelist customers of popular products interested in investing in the company to help fuel its growth. The most famous use of the old Regulation A rules was actually by Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. With the slogan “Get a scoop of the action,” Ben & Jerry’s raised $750,000 from 1,800 ice-cream-loving Vermonters in 1984, allowing them to build a new plant and expand, and setting the stage for a $5.8 million initial offering the following year.

See:  What the Proposed Crowdfunding rules in the US Could Cost Businesses

Sara Hanks points out how retail companies specifically will have a more difficult time with Reg A+, as the filings require an audit, which for retail companies means a physical audit of their inventory.

“For example, I know of two companies that cannot file with the SEC because they’ve only just engaged their accountants for their audit. Both are retail companies with actual sales. Which means inventory. An auditor has to physically examine the inventory both at the beginning of the audit period and the end. Obviously, accountants can’t go back in time and count stuff from a time before they were engaged, so both these companies are going to have to wait for a bit before they can get clean audit opinions.”
– Sara Hanks, CEO @ CrowdCheck

This doesn’t mean we won’t see more consumer companies using Reg A+ the way Ben & Jerry’s did, just that it will take them longer to prepare their offerings for SEC compliance.

We’ve also seen companies in the real estate industry express interest in utilizing Reg A+ as an additional source of capital for development beyond bank loans or large private equity investors; retail investors seeking to diversify their portfolio may also be interested real estate securities tied to specific properties, rather than investing in REITs or aggregated mortgage-backed securities.

Fundrise, EarlyShares, and GroundFloor are real estate investment crowdfunding platforms to keep an eye on, as they have expressed interest in utilizing Reg A+ to make offerings available to unaccredited investors.

Reg A+ Is Expensive

Reg A+ is not for startups looking for seed crowdfunding for their new idea.

“Regulation A+ is not likely to be suitable for an early stage company. Rather, it will most likely be useful for companies that have raised capital already, but now want to raise a significant amount of additional capital (up to $50 MM).  They have the financial resources to hire the lawyers and accountants necessary to engage in the process of a Regulation A+ offering, but not the resources to engage in an IPO.”
– Alexander J. Davie, Securities Attorney

According to CrowdFund.co: “In all, the costs are likely going to range somewhere between $40,000 and $100,000 for the front-end and 1% to 10%+ for the back-end.”

  • Attorney filing fees. Filing your Form 1-A with the SEC: $25,000 to $80,000
  • Accounting & audit costs. Both Tier 1 and Tier 2 of Regulation A+ require two years of audited financials. The second tier simply requires a bit more in terms of ongoing reporting, which adds to the complexity and cost. Tier 2–while a bit more onerous on the reporting side–pre-empts the state Blue Sky laws : $12,000 to $30,000
  • Broker-dealer and other promotional costs.: 5-10%+ depending on investor relationships

These fees should come in time down as providers get accustomed to the new workflow and more attorneys, accounts, and broker-dealers start providing Reg A+ compliance services.

The moniker of “mini-IPO” makes sense for Reg A+ offerings. In addition to the initial registration process, submission of ongoing audited financials to the SEC is required. Though not as strenuous as the PCAOB requirements that public companies adhere to, it is still a significant cost and effort for startups.

For context keep in mind that a real full IPO costs the company raising money on average $2.6 million dollars in registration, legal and financial service fees, and raises an average of $100 million dollars. So there is huge potential here for Reg A+ to allow medium sized companies to raise money that were not yet ready for a standard IPO.

See:  Early Bird Discounts for the 2nd Annual Canadian Crowdfunding Summit (March 3) - NOW AVAILABLE!

Success Stories So Far

Given the long lead-time necessary for a company conducting a Reg A+ offering to get its regulatory filings through the SEC and state securities regulators, true success stories in the form of completed offerings with money in the bank are far and few between. However, several companies have had very successful “testing-the-waters” periods, where investors expressed non-binding interest in participating in a potential Reg A+ offering by the company.

For example, ElioMotors, a startup that aims to develop an ultra-high mileage, low-cost, three-wheeled vehicle with the same comfort and safety as traditional automobiles, hosted a testing-the-waters campaign on StartEngine, an equity crowdfunding platform using Reg A+ and open to unaccredited investors. (Check out our CrowdExpert interview with CrowdFundX, the marketing agency behind Elio’s groundbreaking campaign.)

In 19 days Elio was able to to secure stated interest from 5000 investors to the tune of $16 million, with the company considering a Tier II offering of $25 million. Though it remains to be seen to what degree people who say they would like to invest actually write a check when the offering goes live.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Fintech Spotlight: A Rant About Crowdfunding- “More Transparency Please”

Finance Magnates | Ron Finberg | Dec 8, 2015

Equity crowdfunding transparencyShould equity crowdfunding platforms provide more information about investments to investors?

Finance Magnates' Ron Finberg thinks so.

In this week’s Fintech Spotlight, I share my gripe against the equity crowdfunding industry. Just to put my cards on the table, I happen to be a huge crowdfunding bull. All things being equal, I believe the net gain of retail investors to invest in startups is superior to that of leveraged assets such as forex and CFDs. Both come with tremendous risks, but my belief- and it should be clear that I speak for myself and this isn’t necessarily the view of my employers or colleagues- is that supporting startups and innovation in the world has greater benefits than forex and CFDs.

Why I am telling you all of this? Because I want to be clear that despite my favorable bias towards equity crowdfunding, there is one aspect that worries me about the industry- the way it is marketed.

Conflicting interests

One built-in risk of startup investing is the fear that the founders are defrauding their investors and will run away or misappropriate investments. Investors in equity crowdfunding campaigns similarly face this risk. However, investors can mitigate their risk by diversifying their funds as well as focusing on companies where the founders or the main product has a reliable track record.

What is harder to be careful about are platform providers that knowingly market investments that aren’t in the best interests of their investors. The rationale behind such actions is that most platforms are compensated based on a percentage of the funds raised. Therefore, there is an advantage to bring to market startups with so-called ‘sexier’ businesses that will be easier to pitch to investors.

What are the returns?

The ramifications of the potential conflict of interest between platform providers and their investors is such that rather than only having to conduct due diligence on startups, it is also required of the crowdfunding platform operators.

In terms of analyzing operators, one way is by taking a look at the returns to investors. Unlike stocks which trade daily and profits that can be calculated in real time, with startup investing this is more difficult. However, processes do exist such as publishing returns from exits as well as valuations calculated from further fundraising. One of the best examples is TechStars who shows a very detailed list of the performance of the portfolio from their accelerator investments (list here).

See:  Data on Equity crowdfunding performance

While some crowdfunding platforms such as OurCrowd and AngelList have shown that they do a good job of marketing themselves while still disclosing failures and successes, others are limiting the available data. Recent examples, and the impetus of this article, are CrowdCube and iAngels. Both have published this year of successful exits.

In CrowdCube’s case, the firm announced in July that E-Car Club was its first exit after it was acquired by Europcar Labs. However, investor returns on the deal were withheld. Subsequent queries to E-Car Club, Europcar Labs and CrowdCube drew either ‘no comments’ or silence. In a contributor article from Rob Murray Brown of the blog Fantasy Equity Crowdfunding, he provided whisper estimates of investors realizing 3X returns on their equity.

Similarly being silent was iAngels. The firm announced that portfolio companies Flayvr and Big Blue Parrot were acquired by AVG and Playtika respectively. However, in both cases iAngels withheld requests for disclosure on how investors made out in the deal.

Transparency

The point of this post isn’t specifically to be picking on iAngels and CrowdCube. Many startups have raised funds to help them build great products and grow their firms. Along with other crowdfunding platforms, they also operate in a capitalistic market that requires them to generate revenues and profits to survive.

That being said, the reality of this new industry, and one that I personally am rooting for, is that it still needs to prove itself. Part of that process is transparency. An example would be easy to understand scoreboards that mimic that of other retail facing asset classes to help them understand past performance and just how risky startups as an asset class are. Firms should also provide existing returns on exited businesses to portray to investors what a success really is.

See:

Beyond the platforms, transparency should also arrive in the form of operational updates from startups along with financial filings. While such information could hamstring their competitive position by revealing too much to the public, it is an important proxy used to provide ongoing valuations. This becomes especially important as secondary markets for private company shares aren’t far behind and will offer needed liquidity to investors.

Continue to the full article --> here

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

Early Bird Registration for CCS2016 Now OPEN!  (Limited Discounted Tickets)

CCS2016 banner2

Equity crowdfunding will soon be legal in Canada. Should you jump in?

Canadian Business |

Early bird gets the worm

When Palmer Luckey needed money to develop his virtual reality headset, the Oculus Rift, he turned to crowdfunding. Over a month-long Kickstarter campaign in 2012, 9,000 backers put up US$2.4 million; a year and a half later, Oculus VR was acquired by Facebook Inc. (Nasdaq: FB) for US$2 billion. If the US$300 many of those online supporters pledged had bought them equity instead of an early version of the Rift, they would have netted a $43,500 payout, by some estimates.

Equity crowdfunding, the offering of shares of (typically startup) companies on crowdfunding platforms akin to Kickstarter, has been legal in Europe, Australia and Israel going back as far as 2010, but it’s only now catching on in North America. Saskatchewan was the first province to formally recognize this web-enabled alternative to traditional venture capital or private equity fundraising in 2013.

Regulatory changes set to take effect on Jan. 25, 2016, will legitimize equity crowdfunding in Ontario, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Accredited investors will be able to invest up to $25,000 per company (up to a $50,000 yearly total), while non-accredited investors will be restricted to $2,500 per investment (and a $10,000 cap in Ontario).

British Columbia adopted rules in May capping individual investments at $1,500. The provinces restrict the kinds of companies that can seek funding and how much they can raise. Those looking to set up online portals where issuing companies can list their offerings will also be required to register with regulators and fulfil certain gatekeeper functions, like doing background checks on issuers and reviewing disclosures.

See:

For retail investors, crowdfunding offers a way to diversify one’s portfolio into private equity, normally the preserve of institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals, says Don McDonald, president of Waverley Corporate Financial Services. “I think most people are probably underweighted in private equity,” he adds. Waverley licenses the SeedUps and InvestX platforms in Canada, which allow users to invest in fledgling and established private companies, respectively. (The company uses existing memorandum and accredited investor exemptions, and McDonald says it is unlikely to make heavy use of the new equity crowdfunding regulations.)

Since private company valuations are not strongly correlated to the swings in public equity markets, crowd holdings can provide diversification to investors who already have conventional stock and bond portfolios, he says. “You could even view it as a bit of a hedge.”

Still, it’s a high-risk asset class. Investors would be wise to approach crowdfunding campaigns the same way they do the long-standing market for exempt securities. Most companies seeking funding are in the startup stage, and the failure rate of such enterprises, statistically speaking, ranges between 75% and 90%. “If you’re thinking about investing in crowdfunding, limit your exposure to something that you’re comfortable losing,” says Michael Pieciak, chairman of the corporate finance section committee of the North American Securities Administrators Association. The asset class also has limited liquidity. “There’s no secondary market for trading in crowdfunding,” notes Pieciak. “If you need to access the cash in an immediate way, then you are in sort of a bind. You can’t go to the stock exchange and trade the shares in for dollars.”

See:  Early bird registration open for 2nd Annual Canadian Crowdfunding Summit in Toronto (March 3)

Another issue is the lack of transparency. Notwithstanding regulators’ intrusion into the market, the requirements for financial and governance disclosure are nothing like those for publicly traded companies. You can’t expect to find third-party analysis of the venture, and your financial adviser likely won’t be much help either. McDonald suggests sticking to companies in sectors you understand well.

Continue to the full article --> here

 

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.

 

Final Form of Crowdfunding Regime in Ontario and Other Participating Jurisdictions

AUM Law | November 2015

AUM law

On November 5, 2015, securities regulators in Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (the participating jurisdictions) published the final form of the much anticipated Multilateral Instrument 45-108 - Crowdfunding (MI 45-108 or the crowdfunding regime) which introduces a crowdfunding prospectus exemption for reporting and non-reporting issuers, as well as a registration regime for funding portals. Provided all necessary Ministerial approvals are obtained, MI 45-108 will come into force in the participating jurisdictions on January 25, 2016.

For recent background on the crowdfunding regime and exempt market review, see our July bulletin.

The crowdfunding regime will allow businesses to benefit from greater access to capital from a large number of investors online, including retail investors, through a funding portal operated by a registered dealer.

The following is a summary of some of the key aspects of the crowdfunding regime:

Type of securities and distribution period. Issuers are limited to distributing non-complex “plain vanilla” securities, and the distribution period must end no more than 90 days after the securities are first offered to investors.

Amount of offering and investment limits. The total offering cannot exceed $1.5 million within a 12-month period. Investors are subject to investment limits based on the investor’s income and financial resources.

Offering document, investor rights and delivery requirement. The issuer must file a prescribed form of crowdfunding offering document that, among other things, is certified and provides purchasers with a right of action in the case of a misrepresentation (for a reporting issuer) or untrue statement of a material fact (non-reporting issuer). The offering document and additional offering materials, such as a term sheet or other materials summarizing the offering, must be filed with the regulator within 10 days after the closing of the distribution. The issuer may also be required to deliver to the regulators a video that the issuer made available to purchasers through the funding portal.

Dealer framework. Securities distributed pursuant to the crowdfunding prospectus exemption are required to be distributed through a single funding portal that is registered as an investment dealer, exempt market dealer or restricted dealer.

Registration Categories

  • Restricted dealer funding portal. The crowdfunding regime provides for a “restricted dealer funding portal” category of registration. The restricted dealer funding portal and a registered individual of that portal are not required to comply with certain dealer obligations under National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions, and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103), including certain KYC and suitability obligations. However, restricted dealer funding portals and registered individuals of those portals are not permitted to provide a recommendation or advice to an investor.

Within Ontario, a restricted dealer funding portal may only act as an intermediary in connection with a distribution of securities made in reliance on the crowdfunding prospectus exemption (outside of Ontario, the funding portal may also act as an intermediary in connection with a distribution of securities made in reliance on a start-up crowdfunding registration and prospectus exemptive relief order, provided that the funding portal is in compliance with the terms and conditions of MI 45-108). In other words, a restricted dealer is not permitted to rely on any other prospectus exemptions, including the offering memorandum exemption and the accredited investor exemption. A restricted dealer funding portal will not be able to register in any other registration category, and, in Ontario, is not permitted to be affiliated with another registered firm.

  • Registered dealer funding portal. The participating jurisdictions have amended the crowdfunding regime to permit investment dealers and exempt market dealers to use the crowdfunding prospectus exemption, in addition to other prospectus exemptions, such as the accredited investor or offering memorandum exemptions. Exempt market dealers and investment dealers using the crowdfunding prospectus exemption are required to comply with certain funding portal registration requirements that apply to all funding portals in addition to all of the requirements applicable to their registration category, including KYC and suitability obligations under NI 31-103.
  • Funding portal obligations applicable to all registration categories. Funding portals will be required to fulfill certain gatekeeper functions that include:
  • Reviewing the issuer’s disclosure for completeness, accuracy and any misleading statements, and requiring corrections to disclosure, if necessary
  • Obtaining background checks on the issuer and its directors, executive officers and promoters and obtaining personal information forms from any of the foregoing who are individuals, and denying an issuer access to the funding portal in certain circumstances
  • Monitoring online communications from the issuer on the funding portal

The funding portal is not permitted to advertise a distribution or solicit investors under the crowdfunding prospectus exemption and may only make available to prospective investors the crowdfunding offering document and other offering materials including a term sheet, video and other summary materials. A funding portal is not permitted to act as an intermediary in connection with a distribution of, or trade in, securities of an eligible crowdfunding issuer that is a related issuer of the funding portal.

Ongoing disclosure requirements. Additional disclosure requirements are required for non-reporting issuers, including delivery of comparative annual financial statements, with an accompanying use of proceeds from the crowdfunding distribution. In Ontario, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, non-reporting issuers must provide notice to securityholders of key specified events, including a discontinuation of the issuer’s business, a change in the issuer’s industry and a change of control of the issuer.

AUM Law primarily serves the asset management sector, with specific expertise in the regulatory and investment fund space. We strive to provide the most practical, forward-thinking advice and services, using a business model geared to efficiency, responsiveness and client service excellence. We are pleased to send you this summary of recent developments that may affect your business.

This bulletin is an overview only and it does not constitute legal advice. It is not intended to be a complete statement of the law or an opinion on any matter. No one should act upon the information in this bulletin without a thorough examination of the law as applied to the facts of a specific situation.

Download the full November 2015 Bulletin --> here

The National Crowdfunding Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with both social and investment crowdfunding stakeholders across the country. NCFA Canada provides education, research, leadership, support and networking opportunities to over 1300+ members and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding industry in Canada. Learn more About Us or visit ncfacanada.org.