Global fintech and funding innovation ecosystem

KuCoin’s Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTC

Crypto Regulation | April 1, 2024

Freepik Drazen Zigic Thoughtful businessman - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTC

Image: Freepik/Drazen Zigic

The Escalating Legal Challenges Facing KuCoin Have Sparked Jurisdictional Complexities

On March 26, 2024 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) laid charges against Seychelles-based crypto exchange, KuCoin, and its founders Chun Gan and Ke Tang for anti-money laundering (AML) violations and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business. These charges were based on allegations that KuCoin, despite operating with over 30 million customers worldwide, failed to implement adequate AML and Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures per the Bank Secrecy Act's AML requirements, effectively allowing the platform to be potentially used for illicit activities​.  The lack of compliance has reportedly facilitated over $9 billion in suspicious transactions, highlighting the potential for crypto exchanges to be exploited for money laundering.

See:  OSC Publishes Statement of Allegations Against KuKcoin For Failing to Comply with Ontario Securities Law

On the same day, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a civil enforcement action against KuCoin, marking a separate but equally significant regulatory challenge. The CFTC's charges centered on KuCoin's operations of an illegal digital asset derivatives exchange and committing multiple violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations​.  By classifying certain digital assets as commodities, the CFTC asserts its jurisdiction over derivatives trading related to those assets. 

Jurisdictional Dispute Between CFTC and SEC

An interesting twist in the narrative is the contention surrounding the regulatory jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies, particularly Ethereum (ETH), which has been classified by the CFTC as a commodity in its complaint against KuCoin. This classification directly contrasts with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler’s viewpoint that most cryptocurrencies, excluding Bitcoin, could be considered securities and thus fall under the SEC’s regulatory umbrella. This divergence in regulatory approach has led to confusion and calls for clearer guidelines within the U.S. regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.

See:  CFTC Publishes DeFi Report for Policymakers and Industry

Adding to the regulatory debate, CFTC Commissioner Caroline Pham has expressed concerns that the CFTC's aggressive enforcement action might be infringing upon the SEC's authority, thus complicating the regulatory landscape for digital assets. Pham’s comments highlight the ongoing uncertainty and lack of clarity regarding which regulatory body has jurisdiction over various aspects of the crypto market, especially concerning the classification of cryptocurrencies as commodities or securities​.

Statement of Commissioner Caroline D. Pham Regarding KuCoin Complaint:

“The CFTC has filed another aggressive enforcement action exercising our authority to pursue alleged unregistered crypto asset derivatives trading platforms and other violations of law. I commend the Division of Enforcement’s vigilance in protecting our markets. However, I note that the complaint appears to assert that fund shares held by investors—namely, securities—can themselves constitute leveraged trading pursuant to section 2(c)(2)(D) of the Commodity Exchange Act. This interpretation fails to distinguish between an investment in a fund, which would typically be a security under the jurisdiction of the SEC, and the trading activities of a fund, alleged here to be under the CFTC’s jurisdiction. The CFTC’s approach may infringe upon the SEC’s authority and undermine decades of robust investor protection laws by conflating a financial instrument with a financial activity, disrupting the foundations of securities markets. Owning shares is not the same thing as trading derivatives.”

See:  SEC Scrutinizes Ethereum as ETF Approvals Delayed

KuCoin's Response

KuCoin posted on social media site X reassuring that customer assets remain secure and that their legal team is actively investigating the allegations.  Kucoin also announced a compensation drop for withdrawal congestion and gratitude for loyalty users.

"KuCoin respect the laws and regulations of various countries and strictly adheres to compliance standards."

NCFA Jan 2018 resize - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTCThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit:

Latest news - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTCFF Logo 400 v3 - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTCcommunity social impact - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTC

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!

NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - KuCoin's Regulatory Entanglement Heats Up With DOJ and CFTC


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 − one =