Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

share save 171 16 - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

McKinsey&Company | Dec 2018 | By Jeff Galvin, Feng Han, Sarah Hynes, John Qu, Kausik Rajgopal, and Arthur Shek

global fintech growth VC investments - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

As the fintech landscape continues to evolve, a look at the newest developments from across the globe.

Fintech, the portmanteau of finance and technology, represents the collision of two worlds—and the evolution of the use of technology in financial services. Financial services and technology are locked in a firm embrace, and with this union comes both disruption and synergies.

Insight:  What fintech can learn from Robinhood’s ‘epic fail’ of launching checking accounts

Financial institutions are engaging with fintech start-ups either as investors or through strategic partnerships. Almost 80 percent of financial institutions have entered into fintech partnerships, according to McKinsey Panorama. Meanwhile, global venture capital (VC) fintech investment in 2018 has already reached $30.8 billion, up from $1.8 billion in 2011 (Exhibit 1).

Average deal size is growing as well, particularly in Asia, where it is almost twice as large as the global average, due largely to a number of mega deals.1 The investing public is also enamored of fintechs: Zhong An made waves with its $11 billion IPO valuation last year, while Ant Financial is reported to be raising a pre-IPO round valuing the company at $150 billion.

However, the aggregate investment figures belie a more nuanced set of developments. “Fintech” covers a range of different models. We see four distinct variants, each operating in different niches, with different modus operandi (Exhibit 2):

  • Fintechs as new entrants, start-ups, and attackers looking to enter financial services using new approaches and technologies. These firms seek to build economic models similar to those of banks, often targeting a niche or particular product. The primary challenge for fintechs in this group is the cost of customer acquisition.
  • Fintechs as incumbent financial institutions that are investing significantly in technology to improve performance, respond to competitive threats, and capture investment and partnership opportunities.
  • Fintechs as ecosystems orchestrated by large technology companies which offer financial services both to enhance existing platforms (e.g., AliPay supporting Alibaba’s e-commerce offering) and to monetize current user data or relationships. Because of the very high level of engagement these technology platforms have with their users, they often have a tremendous customer acquisition cost advantage relative to other firms.
  • Fintechs as infrastructure providers selling services to financial institutions to help them digitize their technology stacks and improve risk management and customer experience.

See:  What fintech can learn from Robinhood’s ‘epic fail’ of launching checking accounts

We believe the future will develop in different ways for these varying types of fintechs, and that they will face very different hurdles. For instance, while infrastructure providers will often succeed or fail based on product or technical capabilities, consumer-oriented start-ups most commonly grapple with customer acquisition costs.

For incumbent financial institutions, the biggest hurdles relate to organization and skills as much as investing in technology at scale. Shifting traditional mindsets and operating models to deliver digital journeys at a start-up pace is no easy feat for a financial behemoth.

For established technology players entering the fintech ecosystem, regulatory challenges may prove a hurdle. The “move fast and break things” approach that disrupted the advertising industry is unlikely to be tolerated in financial services. And concerns about monopolistic behavior could well prevent Western tech giants from developing the sort of integrated financial services offerings we see from Ant Financial or Tencent in China.

To cut through the headlines and buzzwords that saturate the discussion of fintechs, we now take a closer look at current trends, and the implications for both incumbents and attackers.


1. High level of regional variation in fintech disruption

Winners in fintech are primarily emerging at a regional rather than global level, similar to traditional retail banking. Regulatory complexity within countries and across regions is contributing to regional “winner take most” outcomes for disrupters. Firms need to invest more in regional compliance rather than launching a global effort on day one.

For example, in money transfer, regulatory approval in a single EU country can be passported across the other EU countries. This encouraged many cross-border payments start-ups, such as WorldRemit and TransferWise in the UK, to expand into neighboring European countries before moving across the Atlantic, which requires additional regulatory investment. Individual US states require licenses for money transfer, which makes US expansion more cumbersome for European operators. This also explains why money-transfer operators in the US, such as Xoom and Remitly, were slower to come to Europe and are not yet operating in Asia as sending markets.

In China, where regulation has been more accommodating, ecosystems were formed by technology giants such as Ant Financial, which have directly entered and are reshaping many financial sectors including digital payments, loans, and wealth and asset management. In the US and Europe, which have stringent regulatory requirements and well-established banking offerings, efforts have been more fragmented and large technology players have been limited to payments offerings and some small-scale lending offerings.

See:  UK banks publish fintech collaboration toolkit

As fintech markets mature, attackers that have established a regional presence are now eyeing international expansion. To successfully enter new markets, they must adapt to new sets of market dynamics and government regulations and select new markets based on a clear understanding of regional variations.

2. AI is a meaningful evolution, not a great leap forward for fintechs

The buzz surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) applications in fintech is intense, but to date few standalone use cases have been scaled and monetized. Rather, we see more advanced modeling techniques, such as machine learning, supplementing traditional analytics in fintech. While AI shows great promise, it is likely to be more of an evolution than a great leap forward into new data sources and methods.

For example, many credit underwriting attackers claim to use AI to analyze vast alternative data sources—ranging from mobile phone numbers to social media activity—but they have not yet displaced traditional credit underwriting methods. In many cases, traditional markers such as repayment history, are still better predictors of creditworthiness than social media behavior, particularly in markets where credit histories (and dedicated agencies to monitor them) are well established. As a result, while consumer lending platforms are increasingly incorporating iterative machine-learning approaches to steadily improve existing performance, they do not need to take a quantum leap in AI to do so.

At least in the short term, winners may not be characterized by completely new modeling approaches or the most complex algorithms, but by the ability to combine advanced analytics and distinctive data sources with their existing business fundamentals.

3. Good execution and solid business models can trump exotic technology

The most successful fintechs have evolved into execution machines that rapidly deliver innovative products, with dynamic digital marketing campaigns to match. Notably, winning start-ups often succeed without using completely new technology. Data-driven iteration, coupled with early and continuous user testing, has led to robust product-to-market fit for these firms.

While cutting-edge technology is exciting, it can also be complex; demand is also untested, which can result in long lead times with little opportunity to validate the business model. As an example, consider cross-border money transfer, a market that has traditionally been dominated by large incumbents such as Western Union. Despite much hype about fintech—particularly blockchain-based solutions—entering the space, no start-up has gained anywhere near the scale of TransferWise, a digital business built on top of traditional payments rails, rather than a reinvention using the latest tech. TransferWise used great user experience and distinctive marketing campaigns to grow rapidly, enabling it to successfully disrupt the space, and to report £117 million in revenues in March 2018.

See:  While Canada debates, others are commercializing our most valuable asset: data

4. Scrutiny of business fundamentals is increasing as funding grows more selective

Years into the fintech boom, after many highs and lows, investors are becoming more selective. While overall funding remains at historically high levels, technology investors globally are increasingly investing in proven, later-stage companies that have shown promise in attaining meaningful scale and profits. Data compiled by PitchBook show that despite a clear increase in total VC funding, investments in early-stage fintechs decreased by more than half from a peak of more than 13,000 deals in 2014, to around 6,000 in 2017. The bar for funding is quickly rising, and companies with no clear path to monetization are going to have a harder time meeting it.

Indeed, several well-known and well-capitalized fintechs have yet to develop a sustainable business model and may need to find a path to more meaningful revenues quickly to continue to attract capital. This is especially evident for challenger digital banks. Some have raised significant sums but still struggle to monetize their products effectively; others have not yet delivered a current account product due to complications around licenses and regulations.

Customer adoption of truly innovative business models takes time, and smaller-scale attackers may require heavy infrastructure investments over a long period before revenues start coming in. Blockchain start-ups, for example, are attracting a significant amount of venture capital with radically new infrastructures for payments and other sectors. However, incumbents remain cautious, with blockchain remaining in prototype mode—and the leap to revenue-generation has yet to take place.

5. Great user experience is no longer enough

Back when banks had cumbersome websites that didn’t render on mobile, it was easy for fintechs to win over customers by building a half-decent app with a great user experience (UX). Today, most financial institutions have transformed their retail user experience, offering full mobile functionality with best-in-class design principles. Great UX is now the norm. Customers, as a result, require more reasons to switch to new fintech offerings.

Robinhood, a US-based stock-trading fintech, simplified stock trading by offering zero commissions through its easy-to-use mobile app with solid UX. But first, it built its user base with free product offerings. It initially made money by investing users’ cash balances. In late 2016, the company launched a successful premium offering called “Robinhood Gold,” which added charges for margin and out-of-hours trading.

See:  Blockchain’s potential will continue to spur public and private investment

Simple interfaces, ease of use, and free stuff no longer equate to a viable business model. Attackers now need to find more robust ways to differentiate themselves from incumbents.

Continue to the full article --> here

NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit:

Latest news - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintechFF Logo 400 v3 - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintechcommunity social impact - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
FFCON20 DIGITAL vertical  - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

NCFA COVID 19 letter to government to support Fintechs and SMEs - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

NCFA Newsletter subscribe600 - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech

PKA SoftTouch | Dick Crawford | Jun 4, 2020 LAKEFIELD, Ontario, June 04, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- PKA SoftTouch Corp.,, the Canadian-based developer of the medically-urgent Microneedle, is nearing the end of its successful preliminary equity crowdfunding campaign, surpassing an early target of $110,870 sixteen days before the close. Canadians can invest from $250 via Canada’s leading equity crowdfunding platform FrontFundr at This campaign situates the company well as it moves to an ultimate goal of $412,000 for animal clinical trials at the Ontario Veterinary College of the University of Guelph, ON of its painless, instantly disposable medication delivery system. These trials will be followed quickly by human clinical trials since the Micro-Needle works on both animals and humans. The Micro-Needle is expected to cut deeply into the traditional needle injection market, via licensing agreements and milestone payments with pharmaceutical suppliers. The small, disposable cylinder-shaped device injects medication directly beneath the skin layer, avoids the nerves that cause pain. It combines the applicator and drug in one pre-measured dose, which is injected directly into the skin. The device is comprised of a top cap with a plunger, inner chamber, bottom chamber, spring, and drug bubble made of special ...
Read More
PKA SoftTouch - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
The New York Times | Mary Williams Walsh | Jun 3, 2020 More than 80 percent of the fees were paid by just 9 percent of account holders, according to the Center for Responsible Lending. Large U.S. banks took $11.68 billion in overdraft fees out of their customers’ accounts last year, even before the pandemic kicked off an economic crisis, according to research by the Center for Responsible Lending. Vulnerable people were by far the hardest hit: Nine percent of account holders paid 84 percent of the overdraft fees, according to the review, which focused on banks with assets of more than $1 billion. Those customers tended to carry low balances, averaging less than $350. The organization said banks should halt overdraft fees during the pandemic, which has led to 40 million new unemployment claims and significant uncertainty about how any recovery will play out. Peter Smith, a researcher who co-wrote the report, said that overdraft fees were a source of distress for many families even in the best of times and that the coronavirus pandemic only magnified their effects. “Banks should not experience an unprecedented windfall as the direct result of their customers’ unprecedented distress,” he said. The group, ...
Read More
overdraft bank fees - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Forbes | Roger Dooley | Jun 1, 2020 Who is the biggest mortgage lender in the U.S.? If you guessed Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, or Bank of America, you’d be wrong. Late in 2017, Quicken Loans passed Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) to become the highest volume mortgage lender. As the two firms continue to vie for the top spot, the difference between them is apparent. Wells Fargo is a traditional bank, tracing its roots to 1852 and today operating more than 8,000 branches. Quicken Loans dates only to 1985 and operates no branches. See:  How is Amazon disrupting the financial services sector? What accounts for Quicken Loans surging ahead of traditional competitors and their long-established customer relationships? The explanation is, quite literally, simple. Quicken’s Rocket Mortgage operation took a complex, intimidating process and made it easy. In my book Friction, I show how brands like Amazon and Uber, as well as smaller niche players, disrupted their competition by creating an effortless customer experience. This is the exact playbook used by Rocket. Rocket Mortgage uses the slogan, "Push button. Get Mortgage." They claim a consumer can get approved in as little as eight minutes. (I’ve spent longer than that sitting ...
Read More
clicks to create an account - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Peer2Peer Finance UK | Michael Lloyd | Jun 3, 2020 Innovate Finance is representing peer-to-peer platforms in talks about non-bank lenders receiving access to cheap funding from the Bank of England, Peer2Peer Finance News can reveal. The industry body has argued that without access to the Bank of England’s Term Funding Scheme – which is currently only available to banks – many non-bank lenders have been prevented from delivering the government’s emergency loan schemes. “We’ve made the case to the government that it’s difficult for P2P lenders to provide emergency loan schemes because they don’t have the same access to cheap funding,” said Iana Vidal, head of policy and government affairs at Innovate Finance. “I think P2P has a huge role to play in delivering the emergency loan schemes and we’ve been trying to get that across to the government. See:  European fintech lending industry to hit USD 9.6 billion in 2020 “Part of the purpose of the schemes is to get finance out quickly to SMEs and that’s where fintech and P2P comes into play. “We think (fintechs) are integral to the conversation and have been saying for a number of weeks that there are some really innovative companies ...
Read More
BoE - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
American Banker | Dave Martin | Jun 4, 2020 I often find myself on the opposing side when I hear “this changes everything” after any technology advances or new digital banking functions are rolled out. Of course, change is occurring in the banking industry. It has been evolving for decades and continues to do so today. The pace may even be picking up. The recent implementation of coronavirus pandemic protocols and a seismic economic disturbance has yet again generated predictions of sweeping shifts in bank operations. However, the sea change some frequently forecast almost never happens as quickly as predicted. Many have forecasted for decades that the end of the bank branch is nigh. This chatter has increased as banks temporarily closed branches amid the coronavirus pandemic. That’s understandable. If so many banks have been able to function and serve their customers with such restricted branch access, many wonder if this truly is the new normal. Maybe this time will finally be the tipping point. See:  4 Digital Transformation Lessons that Banks Need to Learn from Covid-19 However, I would not consider the customer patterns or behavior these past three months as a signal that they are abandoning branches. There ...
Read More
bank branches - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
TechCrunch | Russ Heddleston | Jun 3, 2020 For many startups looking to secure funds, the fundraising marketplace has been a bit of a roller coaster. While there are signs that should make founders feel very optimistic (more on that here), it’s important to know how we got to this point. We’ve used data from the 2020 DocSend Startup Index to track three major metrics to show us real-time trends in the fundraising marketplace. Using aggregate and anonymous data pulled from thousands of pitch deck interactions across the DocSend platform, we’re able to track the supply and demand in the marketplace, as well as the quality of pitch deck interactions. The main two metrics we’ll be looking at are Pitch Deck Interest and Founder Links Created. Pitch Deck Interest is measured by the average number of pitch deck interactions for each founder happening on our platform per week, and is a great proxy for demand. Founder Links Created is how many unique links a founder is creating to their deck each week; because each person you send a document to in DocSend gets a unique link, we can use this as a proxy for demand by looking at how many investors ...
Read More
the future crystal ball - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Sifted | Marie Mawad | Jun 2, 2020 If everyone’s working remotely, will Europe’s tech capitals lose to smaller hubs with lifestyle perks? Marseille for one is making a push to shine. For Matthieu Somekh, who runs a startup campus in Marseille, in the south of France, it’s not uncommon for phone calls to end with people moving city. “I was talking to a Russian entrepreneur yesterday who said he’s planning to move to Marseille and work from here six months a year,” Somekh told Sifted. “Remote work has become a way of life, and the lifestyle and business opportunities in this region are really attractive.” Like the Mediterranean city of Marseille, places from Lisbon in Portugal, to Valencia in Spain, have long been trying to lure entrepreneurs and tech talent with promises of business left untapped — and perks from sandy beaches to cheaper flats. See:  Why workplace learning matters more than ever But now that the coronavirus pandemic has generalised remote work for an undetermined period of time at most startups, the seductive pitch of smaller tech cities across Europe may get better traction from a more receptive audience. So has the time come for local innovation clusters ...
Read More
remote work beach - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Forbes | Madhvi Mavadiya | June 1, 2020 The coronavirus has prompted the U.K.’s biggest government bailout of all time. The bill for subsidies and tax breaks for businesses impacted by Covid-19 has already reached more than £100 billion and will continue to increase. This has prompted concern among some that rescue money is being wasted or exploited by companies that can withstand the pressure of the unprecedented crisis – while the most vulnerable entrepreneurs across the country, especially in highly innovative sectors such as fintech, are not getting an equal level of support. Of particular concern is the impact on female-led fintech businesses. Women consistently find it harder to access finance than their male peers when trying to scale their companies, encouraging them to become inherently more resilient. However, the coronavirus crisis could also make matters worse, especially for female founders in this predominantly male fintech space. According to Innovate Finance’s 2019 Venture Capital Investment Report, female founders make up just 17 percent of fintech companies and women receive only three percent of VC fintech funding. See:  Why venture capital firms need more women partners and entrepreneurs This discrimination is counterproductive. Companies with diverse staff need to be valued ...
Read More
women in fintech and covid recovery - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Guest Post | Jun 2, 2020 I know why you’re here. You’re trying to scale your enterprise while avoiding adding too much on your workload, aren’t you? If you’re nodding in agreement, then you need to start using automation. Automation streamlines your processes, enhances your efficiency in performing tasks, and bolsters your capacity to handle volumes of work. By taking the manual, repetitive tasks off your hands, automation saves you time and effort so you can attend to more profitable ventures. That is why automation is crucial to growing your productivity and the success of your online store. Here are four aspects of your ecommerce operations that you can automate. 1. Product integration Running a dropshipping ecommerce business involves several little, critical, but time-consuming actions. Adding a product to your store is a classic example. You need to copy the product details from your supplier then add them to your store. These details include product photos, names, descriptions, prices, and others. See:  The Enterprise Automation Imperative—Why Modern Societies Will Need All the Productivity They Can Get Manually doing that is fine for one or two items, but for 20 or more? It’ll take hours to complete. Save time and effort ...
Read More
women on laptop - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech
Space | Mike Wall | May 30, 2020 Momentum is building in the private sector We've gotten our hopes up before. The success of NASA's Apollo moon missions half a century ago, for example, made Mars seem very much within reach for human explorers. Indeed, the space agency drew up plans to put boots on the Red Planet by the early 1980s, but shifting political and societal winds killed that idea in the cradle. In 1989, President George H.W. Bush announced the Space Exploration Initiative, which aimed to send astronauts back to the moon by the end of the 1990s and get people to Mars in the 2010s. His son, President George W. Bush, also aimed for a crewed lunar return, with a program called Constellation, whose contours were outlined in 2004. Each program was soon axed by the next administration to come into power. See:  Greater Capitalism: How the pandemic is currently reshaping America’s economic system for the better So it's natural for space fans to greet the grand pronouncements occasioned by SpaceX's first crewed launch on Saturday (May 30) with a bit of skepticism. Yes, the Demo-2 mission to the International Space Station (ISS), the first orbital human ...
Read More
SpaceX rocket launch May 30 2020 - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech


share save 171 16 - Synergy and disruption: Ten trends shaping fintech