Will Competition Reforms Boost Fintech? Inside the Fight

Competition | March 18, 2025

Freepik rawpixel.com, Fight vs give up

Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com

A Win for Competition in Canada, But the Fight Isn’t Over

It's pretty safe to say that every fintech at one point of their journey from start-up to scale-up has experienced the adverse impacts of the lack of competition in Canada.  Whether it’s access to payment systems, customer financial data, fair lending opportunities, or lack of harmonized rules that create interprovincial barriers, fintechs have faced an uphill battle in Canada compared to comparable international jurisdictions like the UK, Australia or the U.S.  The Competition Bureau spent years pushing for stronger competition laws to make markets fairer and limit incumbent businesses from controlling everything.  New rules have now become law, but the real test is whether they’ll actually be enforced and make a difference for fintech and other sector challengers, during a trade war when Canada needs more competition and economic resilience the most.

See:  Canada’s AI Competition Report Faces Big Tech Challenges

While the Competition Bureau has been successful in securing long overdue reforms to the Competition Act, the fact that a federal agency had to fight this hard to get them passed says a lot about how much power big business holds. If regulators had this much trouble getting change through, what chance do fintechs, associations and advocates have?    The Competition Bureau recently shared their story to lift the veil on their fight for more competition in Canada.  Bottom line to fintechs, you have to keep pushing because the fight isn't over.

Big Business Will Fight Against Change

“Historically, competition policy in Canada has been predominantly shaped by the business community, at a plodding pace, and not always transparently.”

That’s a polite way of saying corporate lobbyists and incumbent associations have controlled the rules for decades. The financial sector in Canada is highly concentrated with the big six banks controlling 90% of the country's banking assets, and as a result they get to decide who gets access to financial services, under what conditions, and at what cost.  Unlike in countries where fintech has been encouraged to challenge traditional banking, Canada’s system has delayed competition for as long as possible. Whether it’s the slow rollout of open banking, restrictive access to payments systems, or regulations designed to favour the big players, fintech startups have faced unnecessary barriers to growth.

Canada’s Competition Laws Were Designed to Be Weak

“No merger has been permanently blocked or dissolved in Canada… Mergers to monopoly could not be presumed to be anti-competitive.”

Big financial institutions haven’t faced serious pushback when they’ve bought out potential competitors, even if those deals reduce consumer choice. While there have been numerous of bank-fintech acquisitions and partnerships, it seems one of the best ways to reduce competition is to control access to payment systems, resist changes to open banking innovation, and slow down fintech progress where possible, all while regulators and policymakers sit on the sidelines.  The real issue for fintech isn't just mergers, it's exclusion.

It Took Years of Public Pressure to Get Here

"We started speaking publicly and plainly about the Competition Bureau’s resource pressures and what we viewed as shortcomings of the Act.”

The Competition Bureau went public and made competition a national issue. That’s a lesson fintech companies should take seriously. Big banks and corporate interests benefit when competition policy is decided in private meetings, on their terms. If fintechs want fair opportunity, they need to keep the public and policymakers engaged like the Bureau did.

Monopolies Hurt Innovation and Growth

“We pushed back publicly on boogeyman arguments that competition law reform would stifle business investment.”

Big banks like telecos often claim that stronger competition laws will “hurt investment”. The reality is it's Canada's Monopolies that hurt innovation, not competition. Every time fintech startups push for open banking, fairer lending rules, or access to financial infrastructure, they hear that “it will disrupt the market.”   Yes, that’s the point.  Get used to it.  Canada needs it more than ever.

What Will These Reforms Change?

No more 'efficiencies defence' for big companies that for years have claimed that regulators should allow these takeovers because it saves money while eliminating competition.  Wage fixing is now illegal so banks and other employers (remember the bread scandal) can't secretly agree to keep wages low or stop employees from switching jobs.  The government now has stronger rules to stop monopolies by blocking mergers that reduce competition before they happen.  These changes should help challengers compete but the real test is whether the government will enforce them.

See:  UK Overhauls Payment Oversight – Should Canada Follow?

And then it's a question of the Canadian government's political will.  Canada still has huge regulatory barriers that protect incumbents in banking, telecom, and agriculture.  The government needs to stay aggressive and build upon this competitive momentum.  If they lose steam, large companies will find ways to block competition and these reforms will become meaningless.  For fintech, small businesses, and consumers, the fight isn’t over. The government has shown it can act but only when forced.  We need to make sure they don't stop here.

How Consumers, Businesses, and Fintechs Can Keep the Pressure On

Even with new competition laws, big businesses won’t give up their power easily. If Canada is going to become a truly competitive economy, consumers, small businesses, and fintech startups must keep pushing for change.

Consumers should demand more choice and support fintech alternatives instead of defaulting to the status quo.  They should tell the Competition Bureau if they spot or experience anti-competitive behaviour from unfair fees to deceptive practices.  Consumers need to get informed in the various ways monopolies can hurt them and press politicians to address the problem, not ignore it.

See:  The Crisis Canada and Fintech Can’t Afford to Waste

Companies need to speak up, join fintech associations and business coalitions/groups who have more power together than going at it alone.  Remember, big firms control the conversation by lobbying behind closed doors and leveraging their resources.  Fintechs should work with policymakers and push for open banking implementation and payments reform and help educate the public that monopolies limit their financial options and drive up their costs.

The Fight Isn’t Over

Competition can only get better if people keep pushing for it.  If consumers, businesses, and fintechs keep demanding fair rules, it will be harder for incumbent corporations to unravel progress.  While the new laws are a step forward, real change depends on all of us, so keep battling because this fight isn't done.  Read the backstory to How a New Era of Competition Law in Canada Came To Be for some insight and motivation.


The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association of Canada (NCFA Canada) is a cross-Canada non-profit actively engaged with fintech, alternative finance, blockchain, cryptocurrency, crowdfunding and online investing stakeholders globally. NCFA Canada provides education, research, industry stewardship, services, and networking opportunities to thousands of members and subscribers and works closely with industry, government, academia, community and eco-system partners and affiliates to create a strong and vibrant crowdfunding and fintech industry. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights

Nov 12, 2026 Buying a Canadian money services business starts with identifying what the buyer will acquire: a legal entity, a registration history, contracts, records and possibly an active operation. The value of that package depends on whether it supports the services the new owner intends to provide. A FINTRAC registration entry is an important starting point. It does not establish the company’s financial condition, the quality of its compliance programme or the availability of banking relationships after an acquisition. A payment business may also need a separate assessment under the Retail Payment Activities Act, or RPAA. For investors evaluating a Canadian MSB company for sale, due diligence should connect registration status, actual activities, transaction structure and financial evidence before the parties agree a completion timetable. Verify the Canadian MSB registration and legal entity Begin with the target’s exact legal name, incorporation details, registration number and current status. Match the entity in the corporate documents to the entity in FINTRAC’s Money Services Business Registry. FINTRAC explicitly states that registration does not mean it endorses or licenses a business. It also states that it does not issue licences or certificates of registration. A sales presentation using the phrase “FINTRAC licence” should ...
AI illustration of a Canadian MSB acquisition due diligence checklist covering FINTRAC registration, RPAA compliance, ownership, financial review and banking relationships
November 12, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Wealthtech Investing And Trading Strategy still runs a software business, but Bitcoin now dominates its assets and capital raising. MSCI no longer treats that balance as an index eligible operating company. November 11, 2026, MSCI confirmed Strategy’s removal from the MSCI USA and MSCI World indexes after the November 30 close under its new methodology for non operating companies. MSCI is one of the world’s largest index providers, and its benchmarks are followed by funds investing across global equity markets. Japan’s Metaplanet is also being removed from an MSCI index. MSCI has decided that Strategy no longer qualifies for its equity indexes because Bitcoin now dominates its assets and much of its capital raising. Strategy still sells software and reports operating revenue, but MSCI is drawing a line between a business that holds investment assets and one where those assets have become the main financial story. Why Is MSCI Removing Strategy From Its Indexes? MSCI first looked at a rule aimed specifically at digital asset treasury companies. It later dropped that proposal and change it's methodology to cover companies whose finances ...
AI illustration of Bitcoin and public company symbols representing Strategy’s removal from MSCI indexes and the financing model behind Bitcoin treasury companies
Nov 12, 2026 Crypto market cap is calculated by multiplying an asset's reference price by its circulating supply. A token priced at $2 with 50 million units circulating has a market cap of $100 million. The calculation estimates the value of that supply at the reference price; it does not total the money investors deposited. To understand a change in the ranking, examine both inputs and the provider's definitions. A larger number can result from price changes, supply changes, or revised reporting. Establish what the two inputs represent The arithmetic is simple, but neither input is self-explanatory. “Price” may be a reference assembled from selected trading pairs and venues, rather than the last transaction on the exchange you use. A provider may exclude observations or convert quote currencies. Two services can publish different estimates because their source selection and methods differ. Circulating supply is an estimate of units treated as available in the market under a provider's rules. It may differ from the number minted, the total recorded by a contract, or the maximum permitted under a protocol's current design. Locked balances, treasury allocations, burns, and scheduled releases require interpretation. A transparent methodology matters because identical arithmetic can still use ...
AI illustration of stacks of coins beside financial charts illustrating how cryptocurrency prices and circulating supply affect crypto market capitalization
November 11, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Risk Compliance And Regtech Financial firms are putting AI agents into production well before giving them broad financial authority. That creates time to set identity, permissions and transaction controls before autonomous execution becomes common. On November 11, 2026, Bank of England Financial Policy Committee external member Jonathan Hall used his final FPC speech to examine what happens when AI agents get more authority inside financial firms. A Bank of England and FCA survey of 196 firms found that 80% already deploy AI agents and another 14% plan to within 12 months. Only 2% reported agents with broad autonomy, and none of those were in trading and payments. Finance is adopting agents quickly, but firms are still keeping people and hard limits around the decisions that can change money, positions or customer outcomes. AI Agents Are In Finance But They Are Not Trading Alone The 2026 Bank of England and FCA survey separates four levels of authority: Decision support lets an agent recommend an action while a person decides and executes it. Constrained execution lets the agent act inside preset rules. Conditional autonomy ...
AI illustration of AI agents connected across a financial trading network, representing shared market behaviour, trading automation and financial stability risk
November 10, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Entrepreneurs Startups Small Businesses, Equity Crowdfunding And Alternative Funding A small group of large rounds is carrying Canadian venture totals while deal count and growth stage financing remain well below recent norms. On November 10, 2026, the Canadian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association published its Q3 2026 venture capital report. Canadian companies raised $4.3 billion across 397 deals through September, only 1% less capital than a year earlier. But 23 rounds of $50 million or more represented just 6% of disclosed deals and absorbed 58% of all venture capital invested. Deal count has also fallen every year since 2021. The national total is holding up far better than the number of companies getting financed. Six Big Rounds Carried 59% Of Q3 Venture Capital Q3 produced $1.35 billion across 129 deals. Capital was 1% higher than Q2, but deal count fell 15%. Six rounds above $50 million accounted for $793 million, or 59% of the quarter’s capital. That's a decent quarter for the companies that closed those rounds, but a weak quarter for everyone else. Mega rounds above $50 million totalled $2.5 billion across 23 transactions ...
AI Illustration of large venture capital deals dominating smaller financings, representing concentration in Canada’s VC market
November 11, 2026 | NCFA Story Intelligence | Competition And Market Structure, Wealthtech Investing And Trading, Regulation And Policy Canada is cutting bank fees and switching barriers after years of weak competition, high concentration and poor productivity. On November 7, 2026, the federal government proposed something Canadian investors have complained about for years. Banks would no longer be allowed to charge most investment account transfer fees, which typically cost about $150 per account. Ottawa also wants clearer transfer information and tighter timelines for moving investments to another financial institution. The fee matters because leaving can already be slow and frustrating. Receiving firms often reimburse the outgoing charge to win the account. That means a fee collected by the institution losing the customer can become part of the acquisition cost for the institution trying to win that customer. Canada's six largest banks hold roughly 93% of banking assets. The Competition Bureau was warning about barriers facing fintech competitors in 2017. Ottawa began reviewing open banking in 2018. A federal advisory committee later recommended an operating system by January 2023 and warned that government should not delay. January 2023 came and went. Real Time Rail also slipped years beyond its first expected ...
Digital illustration of Canada bank transfer fee reform showing easier investment account switching, lower fees, open banking, payment infrastructure and stronger financial competition
November 10, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Regulation And Policy Funds, Collateral And Settlement Lead Canada’s Near Term Tokenization Opportunity On November 10, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators published its Project Tokenization Phase 1 findings, setting out where Canadian market participants see the strongest commercial opportunities for tokenization and what regulators plan to test next. The report draws on 233 organizations, 21 bilateral meetings and 80 survey responses, along with workshops attended by 281 people in Calgary and 491 in Toronto. Participants put investment funds, private assets, collateral, treasury and settlement infrastructure ahead of public stocks as the strongest near term opportunities. The report also cuts through one of tokenization’s biggest sales pitches. Blockchain can change how an asset is recorded, transferred or settled, but it doesn't automatically create liquidity, investor demand, broader eligibility or stronger ownership rights. Those outcomes still depend on the product, market, legal structure and infrastructure around it. The CSA now plans to take specific projects into Phase 2 through a 120 day public call for proposals. Firms may be able to use existing regulatory processes, tailored regulatory treatment or bounded testing in a ...
Digital illustration of tokenized financial assets, blockchain settlement and legal infrastructure, representing Canada's investment funds and collateral markets.
Nov 11, 2026 A positive work environment is key for any team that wants to succeed. Team morale is crucial for productivity, motivation, and job satisfaction. Engaging in activities that lift spirits and strengthen connections can lead to great results. Creating a positive team environment requires creativity, engagement, and some fun. Each activity can strengthen connections, boost motivation, and improve workplace dynamics. When teams focus on strategies to boost morale, they work toward shared success. These activities can lead to lasting memories and help build a stronger team culture. Here are some fun strategies to help improve your team's morale and make the workplace livelier. Fun at the Arcade Visiting an arcade spot is a great way to enjoy time together and build teamwork. Imagine your team facing challenges with various games. Whether it's racing or playing team games, the arcade encourages friendly competition and bonding. These fun experiences can help reduce stress and improve relationships among coworkers. Arcades offer many options to suit diverse interests and skill levels. The lively atmosphere invites everyone to relax and take a break from their daily tasks. Shared laughter and enjoyment can lead to better communication and teamwork when you return to the ...
Digital illustration of team building activities boosting workplace morale with coworkers playing games and laughing in a bright modern office
November 10, 2026 | Market Activity | Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health A Brokerage Race Beyond $0 Commissions On November 10, 2026, Webull Canada added Nasdaq Basic Canada, giving clients free real time Level 1 quote and trade data across Canadian listed equities. The feed provides best bid, best offer and last sale information for stocks listed on the TSX, TSX Venture, CSE and Cboe Canada. Nasdaq says its consolidated feed can reduce Level 1 market data costs by more than 60% compared with traditional Canadian data packages. Webull isn't first to give Canadian investors free real time information. The more interesting story is how quickly another paid feature is becoming part of the basic brokerage account. Wealthsimple helped normalize $0 trading in 2019, Questrade followed in 2025 and Webull dropped its own commissions in April 2026. With the headline trading fee largely gone, brokers now need other reasons for investors to move money and keep it on the platform. Who Led Canada’s Race To $0 Trading And Free Market Data Wealthsimple Trade launched nationally on March 13, 2019 with $0 commissions on Canadian and U.S. stocks and ETFs. Questrade removed commissions on listed stocks and ETFs ...
AI illustration of Canadian online brokerage competition with racing cars promoting $0 commissions, free real time market data and transfer match bonuses
November 10, 2026 | Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding A Toronto Fintech Riskfuel Analytics Brings AI Pricing Into BBVA’s Global Markets Workflow On November 10, 2026, BBVA deployed Riskfuel Analytics' neural pricing technology inside the pre-trade structuring workflow for autocallable products on its ePricer platform. Riskfuel is a Toronto fintech founded in 2019 that builds AI models for derivatives pricing. BBVA is a global bank with a large corporate and investment banking business. The deployment puts Canadian built AI directly into the calculations used to design complex structured products at a major global bank. Riskfuel's model is trained on BBVA's own pricing engine and uses more than 4,000 market and product inputs. The company says the surrogate was tested against more than 100,000 trades and can evaluate thousands of candidate structures in under a minute. BBVA had already added AI generated investment ideas to ePricer in September. Riskfuel goes further into the workflow by speeding up the numerical pricing work while BBVA's own model remains the reference. How Riskfuel Speeds Up BBVA's Autocallable Pricing Autocallables can depend on volatility, interest rates, dividends, maturity, coupon levels and several barrier conditions. Autocallables are structured investments ...
AI illustration of AI powered derivatives pricing shown on a financial trading screen, illustrating Riskfuel technology used in BBVA structured product workflows

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *