Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
OECD The Forum Network | Olivia White | Aug 10, 2021
Even before the COVID-19 crisis, policy makers in the OECD and beyond were identifying the potential for innovation and productivity growth that could be derived from building out digital financial infrastructure including greater sharing of financial data. This focus has helped give rise to the Open Banking Implementation Entity in the United Kingdom, the European Union’s second payment services directive, and broad discussion in the United States around a consumer-authorized data-sharing market, among other initiatives.
Our research suggests that the upside in terms of generating GDP growth is considerable. At the same time, we find that the size of that GDP lift, and how the economic value can be shared among the various market participants, depend in large part on the design and working of each ecosystem, and in particular the degree to which data are standardized and how broadly they are shared.
In our recently published study, we focused on four regions—the European Union, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States—and identified seven mechanisms for value creation from the adoption of open-data for finance.
For consumers, these ecosystems can increase access to financial services, including for individuals and small businesses who might otherwise be shut out for lack of credit history. They can also improve user convenience, including with potentially substantial time savings from less routine form-filling, among others, and provide a much larger range of financial product options.
For financial providers, the value-creating mechanisms we identified include increased operational efficiency arising from more efficient data management, along with stronger fraud prevention, improved workforce allocation, and reduced friction from data intermediation, given the reduced need to pull in data from third-party providers.
We sized 24 use cases across these seven mechanisms. Extrapolating to a country or regional level, our analysis suggests that the boost to the economy from broad adoption of open-data ecosystems could range from about 1 to 1.5 percent of GDP in 2030 in the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, to as much as 4 to 5 percent in India. All market participants benefit, be they institutions or consumers—either individuals or micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs)—albeit to varying degrees.
Only a fraction of that potential value is being accessed currently

Capturing more of the potential value will require a greater degree of data standardization and broader data sharing. For now, both are quite varied across the four regions we examined.
Key takeways from our research include the critical importance of establishing trust in the system, along with the infrastructure to support it. Financial data are particularly sensitive, and users are more likely to want to share data if they know what they are sharing and why that sharing is valuable to them.
Digital infrastructure is also a must, and ecosystems with high-assurance digital ID have an advantage in being able to control use of data and reduce friction in managing online accounts.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
CBC | Aug 16, 2021

The Conservative Party of Canada today released its full 160-page election platform — an ambitious agenda that promises billions of dollars in new spending to prop up an economy ravaged by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Unlike past Conservative platforms, this one embraces a robust role for government in the economy through large cash injections to help businesses weather the pandemic crisis over the next two years.
The multi-billion dollar plan has not yet been costed; the party says the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has not finished studying the numbers.
O'Toole said a Conservative government would balance the budget in ten years' time. The federal deficit for this fiscal year alone is expected to be $381.6 billion.
"You'll probably notice ideas that you haven't heard from Conservatives like me before. It's time for Conservatives to take inequality seriously, because that's becoming more of a problem in our country," Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole says in the opening paragraphs of the document.
Beyond job-creation measures and child care, the detailed platform includes a number of populist-minded measures — a tougher regulatory stance on cell phone companies, a crackdown on grocery price fixing and new legislation to "open banking so Canadians can connect with fintech companies that can provide a better offer for banking services."
A Conservative-led government would also order the Competition Bureau to investigate bank fees. O'Toole said he would allow foreign telecommunications companies to offer cell phone service to Canadians to drive down prices, "provided that the same treatment is reciprocated for Canadian companies in that company's country."
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Paytechs of Canada | Alex Vronces | Aug 2, 2021
The report neglects write accessAs expected, the advisory committee has recommended that Canada focus on implementing read access at launch and write access in a later phase of open banking. Read access lets consumers and businesses share their financial information with fintechs, while write access lets them authorize fintechs to act upon it — by opening a new bank account, for example, or moving money from one account to another. The advisory committee’s timeline suggests that we shouldn’t even begin considering write access until 2023.
This is a mistake of import. As the Competition Bureau has said, Canada will see more competition and innovation in the financial sector if we make the movement of money between financial institutions more seamless, empowering Canadians to better vote with their dollars. Write access, if done right, will make the movement of money more seamless than ever.
I’m not saying write access should be turned on at the same time read access is. The advisory committee is a sage assembly. They know that they risk getting nothing if they ask for too much. That’s why they even suggested starting with a limited scope of read access to financial information. Write access — because we’re talking about the movement of money — comes with more risk and complexity, which, according to the advisory committee, would delay the roll out of open banking.
So if now’s not a good time to consider write access, then when is?
The first is that this is just a report and it’s still up to the federal government to act on the recommendations. Though there’s no reason to think the federal government won’t, there’s no reason to think it will. Minister Freeland’s statement in support of a “regulated, made-in-Canada system” is reassuring, but such a system can take many shapes and sizes, and promises are just promises for a sector that has seen so many go unfulfilled.
The second is that the advisory committee’s recommended timeline is looking increasingly uncertain.
For one, open banking is already behind schedule. The report was dated April, but the report was released in August. With a proposed go-live of January 2023, we should have already delivered one of the report’s foundational recommendations by now: appoint a “tsar” to work with the relevant players to make progress on the first phase of open banking.
If I had to bet, I’d say the timeline is going to look more and more uncertain as time goes on. With an impending election, we’re going to lose another few months of valuable time. On top of that, the report mentions a few things that could further delay the implementation of a “regulated, made-in-Canada system,” including “existing legislative or regulatory impediments.” As we all know, there’s no upper bound on how long legislative and regulatory change can take.
Tough practical and political choices will need to be made. The cynic in me suspects that these trade-offs will be made behind closed doors, as push comes to shove in the negotiations between banks and the government. Whether they’ll be made to open banking’s favour or detriment is to be determined.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Department of Finance Canada | Kirsten Fraser | Aug 4, 2021
What is Open Banking? Open banking allows consumers and small businesses to securely and efficiently transfer their financial data among financial institutions and accredited third party service providers. This transfer gives consumers access to a more complete financial picture and other useful services to improve their financial outcomes.
Open banking can connect families with a broader range of budgeting or savings tools and provide financially marginalized Canadians access to low cost, automated support to manage their finances. Open banking can enable Canadians with limited credit history, including newcomers, access to credit based on their financial transaction history. The value proposition of open banking for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is also strong. Open banking can facilitate faster adjudication of loans and provide access to new forms of capital . Automated financial tools delivered through an open banking system can streamline the management of bills, invoices, payroll, and taxes to reduce the complications of running a small business.
To eliminate screen scraping, the initial phase of open banking should be implemented quickly, with the system becoming operational by January 2023. The implementation should be neither exclusively government-led nor industry-led. Instead, Canada should pursue a hybrid, made-in-Canada approach that recognizes the potential for government and industry to collaborate, each with appropriate roles.
A hybrid, made-in-Canada open banking system should have the following core foundational elements:
1. Common rules for open banking industry participants to ensure consumers are protected and liability rests with the party at fault;
2. An accreditation framework and process to allow third party service providers to enter an open banking system; and
3. Technical specifications that allow for safe and efficient data transfer and serve the established
policy objectives.
Open banking will be successful in Canada if consumers and small businesses can intentionally share their data in a safe and efficient manner to access useful products and services without the use of screen scraping. The availability of these new services will enhance the welfare of Canadian consumers and businesses and support innovation and economic growth in Canada without compromising the safety and stability of Canada’s strong financial system.
1. Six key consumer outcomes should provide the basis for an open banking system in Canada:
2. Financial inclusion should be considered in the design of an open banking system and be
complemented by financial education policies, programs, and resources.
3. Open banking in Canada requires a hybrid, made-in-Canada approach, one that harnesses the
benefits of both industry and government-led models deployed elsewhere, but better reflects the
Canadian context.
4. Federally regulated banks should be required to participate in the initial scope of the open banking system and provincially regulated financial institutions such as credit unions should have the opportunity to join on a voluntary basis. Participation from other entitles should be allowed upon meeting accreditation criteria and following the rules of the open banking system.
5. The initial scope should apply to both consumers and SMEs.
6. The initial scope should reflect data currently available to Canadians through their online banking applications, including chequing and savings accounts, investments accounts accessible through a consumer’s online banking portal and lending products. The initial scope of data shared in Canada’s open banking system should not be limited to specific use cases.
7. Consumer-provided data, balance data, transaction data, product data and publicly available data should be part of the initial open banking scope. All industry participants should have the right to exclude derived data and an obligation to justify any exclusion.
8. The initial scope should be limited to read access functions. However, the system should be built to allow the scope to be expanded to include new types of data and write access functions once the system is established and the risks can be fully understood and addressed.
9. All participants within the open banking system should be equally subject to consumer-permissioned data mobility requests. Reciprocity must be driven by express consumer consent and participants should not be allowed to require reciprocal data access in order to provide a product or service.
10. Governance must be impartial, transparent, and representative of all parties in an open banking system. Governance of the open banking system could proceed in a phased approach, commensurate with the risks posed to the system.
11. Common rules, an accreditation framework and technical s pecifications are the key foundational elements which need to be advanced before open banking can begin formally operating in Canada.
12. The Government should appoint a lead responsible for convening stakeholders to advance the key foundational elements (9 months) and implementation (9 months) of a system of open banking.
The mandate of the lead should include the following:
13. The Government should ensure the engagement of consumer representatives in this work including considering remunerating these representatives to support meaningful engagement.
14. The Government should establish a formal governance entity to provide ongoing administration and seamless transition to an open banking system following the conclusion of t he lead’s work programme.
15. The Government should consider the need to formally codify some elements of open banking in legislation or regulation, with a view to expanding to additional products or functions over time.
Establish common rules to ensure the efficient functioning of an open banking system. The objective of these rules should be to protect consumers and ensure a positive consumer experience.
17. The Government should address legislative or regulatory impediments that could inhibit the operationalization of an open banking system, particularly with a view to resolving hurdles that necessitate bilateral contracts.
18. The common rules should ensure a consistent and high standard of consumer protection safeguarding the transmission of data while avoiding regulatory overlap in respect of how the data is used.
19. The common rules should articulate that liability flows with the data and rests with the party at fault.
20. The rules regarding complaints handling and liability attribution must be simple and efficient for consumers. Each participant must have internal and external complaints handling mechanisms in place, as well as data traceability protocols. In all functions of open banking, consumers must be limited from liability beyond a fixed dollar amount (e.g., $50) unless gross negligence or criminal act can be proven.
21. The common rules must prescribe clear and automatic terms of redress for consumers, which include immediate compensation for any financial loss and follow appropriate standards of care for protection and redress regarding a loss of sensitive financial data.
22. Common rules for privacy should be developed for the following two areas:
23. The common rules should prohibit undue pressure on consumers, ensure that information provided to consumers is accurate, clear and not misleading, and require public disclosure regarding consumer complaints received.
24. Common rules for security should be developed for the following two areas:
25. A minimum “floor” of security standards should be followed by entities seeking accreditation with stronger security standards required based on risk.
26. Educational tools and resources should be developed for consumers to raise consumers’ awareness of their rights and responsibilities.
27. The common rules should be developed in an impartial, consistent, transparent and representative manner, with sufficient government oversight to ensure consumer interests are protected and public policy objectives are met.
28. The accreditation criteria should be sufficiently robust to protect consumers but not so stringent as to exclude a wide range of market participants.
29. The criteria should be sufficient to demonstrate that the participant is able to comply with the common rules related to liability, privacy and security, including having sufficient financial capacity to ensure consumers are protected in the event of loss.
30. The accreditation process should be trusted, independent, proportional to risk, transparent and coherent with other regulatory regimes. The accreditation criteria, as well as the list of accredited firms, should be easily accessible to consumers and other market participants.
31. Accreditation will be required for entities to be allowed in the open banking system with the exception of federally regulated banks. Consideration should also be given to exempting provincially regulated financial institutions, such as credit unions, from accreditation requirements.
32. Firms seeking accreditation should bear the costs of the accreditation process, with a party outside the open banking system, such as an independent entity with appropriate auditing capacity or a government regulatory body, undertaking the process. The accreditation framework and individual firms’ accreditation should be reviewed and updated at regular intervals.
33. Efforts underway in the market to develop technical specifications should continue over the next 9 months, with the goal of aligning with the following principles:
34. The open banking lead should engage technical expertise to actively participate in technical specifications development to ensure public policy objectives are met. Government should intervene in the process if no adequate solution emerges.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Crowdfund Insider | | Jul 28, 2021
LendingClub (NYSE:LC), a Fintech that started as a peer-to-peer lender and now operating as a digital bank, has posted strong 2nd quarter results that easily topped expectations. LendingClub finally turned the corner on profitability shredding guidance that had expected a loss. Shares moved considerably higher in after-hours trading during a crowded earnings announcement day.
At the start of 2021, LendingClub completed the acquisition of Radius Bank thus entering the red hot digital banking sector. This quarter is the first earnings round as a nationally chartered digital bank.
According to LendingClub sequential revenue increased by 93%, driven by growth in marketplace lending revenue and increased net interest income from the retained portfolio of consumer loans. Total revenue was $204.4 million, almost double the previous quarter, with net income jumping to $9.4 million – in stark contrast to the $47.1 million loss delivered in Q1.
The fact that LendingClub will now be able to hold deposits as a bank means a lower cost of funding for its online lending segment.
LendingClub CEO Scott Sanborn, issued the following statement:
“Our first full quarter operating a digital bank was the most profitable quarter in LendingClub’s history. This is the beginning of a dramatically enhanced earnings trajectory for the business. Our transformation is fueled by our competitive advantages, which include our 3.5 million-plus members, deep data capabilities, marketplace model as well as our more efficient operating platform. Our earnings are being bolstered by our bank, which is generating a new stream of recurring net interest income that is only beginning to contribute to our bottom-line results.”
LendingClub highlighted the following stats:
Updates:
Shares in LendingClub have rocketed higher today jumping by over 55% (as of this moment).
The few analysts that participated in the earnings call congratulated LendingClub on its performance. Earlier today, Wedbush analyst Henry Coffey boosted his price target to $33.50 (from $25), reiterating an outperform call, after calling the results “amazing.”
By becoming a nationally chartered bank, via its acquisition of Radius Bank, LendingClub is now financing its own loans, alongside a growing number of other institutions – including other banks (which now account for more than half of funding including LendingClub Bank).
Management also said there were some unanticipated benefits by becoming a bank as being regulated as a bank helped boost confidence for bank investors. There is a lot of confidence in credit quality.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
McKinsey & Company | By Chandana Asif, Tunde Olanrewaju, Hiro Sayama, and Ahalya Vijayasrinivasan | Jul 11, 2021

If open finance continues to accelerate, it could reshape the global financial services ecosystem, change the very idea of banking, and increase pressure on incumbents.
Banks hold a record of much of what we spend, save, and borrow—from electricity bills and mortgage payments to our weekly spend on fuel and coffee. Now, some of that customer data is being shared with third parties in a global movement known as “open financial data” (sometimes referred to as “open banking.”) Roughly half a decade in the making, it’s unlocking a wave of digital financial innovation—and likely disruption.
Brought on by a combination of government regulation and market forces, open financial data allows an expanding universe of players—both financial and non-financial—to access customer accounts and data in order to offer new products and services (all contingent on customer consent) (Exhibit 1).
For customers, open financial data affords greater flexibility in how their money is managed, allowing, for instance, better visibility of accounts and more convenient access to payments. (This paper focuses primarily on benefits for consumers; for more detail on benefits for all participants, including financial institutions, see our recent related report, “Financial data unbound: The value of open data for individuals and institutions.”) Still in its infancy, the movement has the potential to reshape everything from bank accounts, credit cards, payments, mortgages, small business loans, and even insurance policies.
Around the world, this trend is evolving in different ways. In the European Union, the United Kingdom, South Korea, Australia, and India, governments have mandated large banks to open up their vast troves of customer accounts to other companies, in a bid to stimulate competition (Exhibit 2). In the United States and China, it is a market-led movement, with companies establishing open-banking relationships among themselves. Singapore is using a blend of the two models.

The adoption of new digital habits and a dramatic movement toward online channels during the pandemic appears to have accelerated open banking. With so much more of their lives spent online, both consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) became much more open to fintech apps and other non-traditional financial products and services. They also habituated to greater levels of convenience, choice, and flexibility in their financial relationships. In just the first six months of 2020, the number of users of open banking–enabled apps or products in the UK doubled from one million to two million and grew to over three million as of February 2021. In the US, almost one in two consumers now use a fintech solution, primarily peer-to-peer payment solutions and non-bank money transfers.
We believe that if open finance continues to accelerate it could reshape the global financial services ecosystem, change the very idea of banking, and increase pressure on incumbent banks. According to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, a significant share of customers who are dissatisfied with their current accounts, earn uncompetitive interest rates on savings accounts, or pay higher mortgage rates do not change providers due to the hassle of switching or lack of visibility into better options. The ability for customers to better understand their full financial picture—one of open banking’s promises—could result in margin compression, as pricing and charges become more transparent. Banks may also have to contend with margin sharing, as payouts to digital platforms could play a far greater role in customer acquisition.

The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |