Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
The Tyee | Bryan Carney | Aug 26, 2021

An investigation into allegations that select companies — including RBC, Canada’s largest bank — were given access to the private Facebook messages of people using their apps has been shut down by Canada’s privacy watchdog.
The Tyee first broke the news that Canada’s Office of the Privacy Commissioner was investigating RBC in February 2019, following a 2018 New York Times exposé on Facebook “partners” that were exempted, or “whitelisted,” from tighter data rules implemented in 2014-2015 in the wake of privacy scandals at Facebook.
These special “partners” — such as RBC, Netflix, Amazon, Spotify and others — were given access to every private message sent or received using Messenger, Facebook’s popular messaging platform, when users of the partner company apps linked them to their Facebook profiles.
Because the data made available to these partners consisted of private messages, it was potentially more revealing and violated more privacy expectations than the data infamously acquired in the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal, which allowed outside developers to gather data such as likes and friend lists on not only app users, but their friends.
The whitelisting deal involved access up to a decade’s worth of private messages sent to or received from friends of app users with an expectation of privacy.
Although the full extent of exposure through whitelisting remains unknown, there is the potential for the same kind of multiplier effect seen in the Cambridge Analytica case, in which 87 million Facebook profiles were harvested based on the responses of just 270,000 people who unwittingly allowed access to their friends’ Facebook activities by downloading an app.
This is because each app user who connected to Messenger will have exposed their messages to Facebook partners from every person who ever messaged them — whether those other parties had installed the app or not.
In 2018, when news broke about special agreements allowing some companies’ continued access to Facebook data — internally known as “whitelists” — Spotify and Netflix admitted they had the extra abilities, but claimed they weren’t aware or didn’t use them.
RBC was also named and had the same privileges — as shown in leaked Facebook emails detailed in the New York Times — but denied it ever had access.
Facebook confirmed directly to The Tyee that the bank had access to read, write and delete its app users’ private Facebook messages. Facebook declined to say if or how many times those privileges were used by the bank.
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has confirmed to The Tyee that it shut down its two-year-long investigation of RBC five months ago, without any announcement. The office wouldn’t provide any information on its findings. It pointed instead at ongoing legal proceedings, targeting Facebook only, as the best course of action.
The end of the investigation may mean that Canadians and lawmakers, as MP Charlie Angus put it in a Jan. 31, 2019 meeting of Parliament’s Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics — will have to “take RBC’s word for it” that the data wasn’t accessed, stored or misused.
Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien confirmed earlier that there had been several complaints “on whether or not the Royal Bank was violating PIPEDA [Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act]” and that “RBC’s alleged role in receiving information from Facebook” was the subject of an investigation.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
c|net | Rae Hodge | Aug 28, 2021

James Martin/CNET
Privacy is now a priority among browser-makers, but they may not go as far as you want in fighting pervasive ad industry trackers on the web. Here's a look at how you can crank up your privacy settings to outsmart that online tracking.
Problems like Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal have elevated privacy protection on Silicon Valley's priority list by showing how companies compile reams of data as you traverse the internet. Their goal? To build a richly detailed user profile so that you can become the target of more accurate, clickable and thus profitable advertisements.
Apple and Google are in a war for the web, with Google pushing aggressively for an interactive web to rival native apps and Apple moving more slowly -- in part out of concern those new features will worsen security and be annoying for users. Privacy adds another dimension to the competition and to your browser decision.
Apple has made privacy a top priority in all its products, including Safari. For startup Brave, privacy is a core goal, and Mozilla and Microsoft have begun touting privacy as a way to differentiate their browsers from Google Chrome. It's later to the game, but Chrome engineers have begun building a "privacy sandbox" despite Google's reliance on ad revenue.
For all of the browsers listed here, you can give yourself a privacy boost by changing the default search engine. For instance, try DuckDuckGo. Although its search results may not be as useful or deep as Google's, DuckDuckGo is a longtime favorite among the privacy-minded for its refusal to track user searches.
Other universal options that boost privacy include disabling your browser's location tracking and search engine autocomplete features, turning off password autofills, and regularly deleting your browsing history. If you want to take your privacy to the next level, consider trying one of the virtual private networks CNET has reviewed that work with all browsers.
In the Chrome Web Store, click Extensions on the left and type the name of the extension you're looking for into the search bar. Once you find the correct extension in the search results, click Add to Chrome. A dialog will pop up explaining which permissions the extension will have for your browser. Click Add extension to bring the extension into your browser.
If you change your mind, you can manage or remove your extensions by opening Chrome and clicking the three dot More menu on the right. Then select More Tools and then Extensions. From here, you'll also be able to see more about the extension by clicking Details.
Firefox's default privacy settings are more protective than those of Chrome and Edge, and the browser has more privacy options under the hood, too.
From inside Firefox's main menu -- or from inside the three lined menu on the right side of the toolbar -- select Preferences. Once the Preferences window opens, click Privacy & Security. From here, you'll be able to choose between three options: Standard, Strict and Custom. Standard, the default Firefox setting, blocks trackers in private windows, third party tracking cookies and cryptominers. The Strict setting may break a few websites, but it blocks everything blocked in Standard mode, plus fingerprints and trackers in all windows. Custom is worth exploring for those who want to fine tune how trackers are being blocked.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Insurtech Insights | Aug 5, 2021
When you have even just $100 in a liquidity pool, you dread the day you awake to it being gone.Your bags are gone. How do you alleviate that concern? With insurance. Unfortunately, DeFi users don’t have much choice when protecting their assets, and only an estimated $2 billion of DeFi’s $100 billion TVL is insured. Needless to say, crypto and DeFi are still in the exploratory phase in finding an optimal insurance solution. Exploits have become almost inevitable and hidden in plain sight.
Many great projects have pushed the need for crypto insurance forward. At first, Nexus Mutual paved the way. They realized that when it comes to insuring DeFi assets, there wasn’t enough data to understand the events you’re trying to cover. They built a mutual where people could pool their collateral and vote on which claims to recognize.
The mutual system has been around for centuries. It’s proven to be a good measure when you have limited data and availability to judge, similar to the syndicated pool from Lloyds of London.
In the sense of adapting to the blockchain, methods are evolving. All the data is public and transparent. Certain risks are starting to occur, giving us insight into what needs to be covered: flash loans, bugs, rug pulls, etc. Downside risks should be covered through automated systems over mutual insurance because even though mutual coverage is suitable for the start, it has varying effects, particularly when paired with governance.
Even though you’re covered, if people don’t vote objectively, you don’t get the coverage even if an event happens. We should automate the process to remove unpredictable human elements as much as possible. Crypto insurance can be built entirely with code for efficiency and reliability, providing an answer for the cumbersome claims process.
Insurance in crypto today is poorly built. What’s more, the only insurance we have is retail insurance, and it typically relies on the mutual system. Say Bob wants insurance for an event, so he goes to Alice for the $100 worth of coverage he wants. When an event happens, Bob goes to Alice to recover the $100. But first, he must wait for a vote to see if he gets the insurance.
The mutual system is proving to be fundamentally flawed and doesn’t provide optimal coverage for policyholders. We saw its flaws surface last February when a risk event took place for a covered protocol. Everyone was insured, but none of the people in charge of voting or insurance voted. No one got covered for their downside. Ironically, the insurance itself has introduced a new form of risk. If the goal is to decentralize and live on smart contracts, we haven’t done that yet.
Even with insurance, people are trying to share specific risks. Insurance often covers particular risks with particular criteria, but that approach isn’t always ideal. Instead, the process should focus on standardization and generalization while building insurance into an options and derivatives market in the sense where you make an agreement that, if this event happened, then you’re covered.
The current insurance model is fundamentally flawed. In DeFi, we typically see coverage for catastrophic events that arise from systemic failures inherent to protocol composability.
Recently, the Covid-19 pandemic has sparked debate over who should shoulder most of the costs from a messy event which is difficult to model and often left out of insurance contracts. “Parametric insurance” has predefined event parameters and a fixed maximum coverage amount; many believe this to be the best solution.
Parametric insurance is one way that DeFi can embrace a more systemized and efficient coverage model. Parametric insurance, which offers pre-specified payouts based upon a trigger event, can be automated because of the innate transparency of blockchain data. If an event happens to meet the criteria, you get paid for the predetermined amount on the policy.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |