Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
December 19, 2025

Image: Pixabay/TheDigitalArtist
In the Canadian Industrial Sector, sustainability is no longer just a matter of image; it has become a financial metric that can be measured. That is, resource management along the entire asset lifecycle has to be demonstrated by companies to be efficient, as it is getting more and more expected by investors, lenders, and regulators. The move to a Circular Economy has been manifested the most in capital-heavy industries like pharmaceuticals and Food & Beverage, where the selection of equipment has a direct impact on balance sheets, ESG performance, and future competitiveness.
Instead of only investing in new machines, Canadian companies are now looking for high-quality secondary markets for industrial assets. The availability of dependable, used machines—like a rotary lobe pump from Carter-Wilson—shows that circular asset approaches can provide not just operational performance but also verifiable sustainability benefits. For CFOs and finance leaders, circular asset management is no longer “nice to have”; it is rapidly evolving into a strategic lever in Sustainable Finance Canada.
In the current financial ecosystem, the ESG factors are taking a primary role in deciding the fate of investments. Asset-Based Lending has included the questions regarding reuse, refurbishment, and decommissioning planning of the equipment. Fintech, as well as venture capitalists, are more and more focusing on the duration of the productivity of the assets and on the efficacy of the companies in "embodied carbon" reduction.
Pharma and food processing machines' reuse brings down the carbon footprint considerably when compared to their new counterparts. From the ESG perspective, the reuse of specialized industrial assets is a good way to reduce Scope 3 emissions and comply with stringent regulations as well as sanitary standards. Consequently, companies that are actively engaged in circular economy markets tend to have lower risk profiles to lenders over the long run.
For the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Canada, one of the major constraints still remains to be the capital expenditure. However, circular asset management presents a very practical solution by changing what would usually be a heavy initial CAPEX into a more flexible investment strategy.
Among the major financial advantages are:
* Better cash flow, which makes it possible to invest more in R&D and digital transformation
* Shorter time to market since secondary equipment is usually right available
* Higher leverage ratios, which helps to get better access to Asset-Based Lending
Through the collaboration with reliable and circular asset providers, companies will be able to import top quality industrial machines, which will, in turn, double the production, while the capital for innovation will still be there.
One common concern around second-hand pharmaceutical machinery is risk. However, modern industrial marketplaces have addressed this through rigorous inspection, documentation, and traceability. In regulated sectors, equipment is verified for sanitary compliance, maintenance history, and operational performance before resale.
This level of due diligence reduces operational risk and supports lender confidence, making circular assets increasingly acceptable within formal financing structures.
As procurement teams align more closely with finance and sustainability functions, equipment sourcing has become a strategic decision rather than purely operational one. Platforms offering refurbished industrial mills are increasingly positioned as sustainable industrial solutions—bridging procurement efficiency with ESG accountability.
For fintech-driven financing models, this alignment creates new opportunities to structure loans and leasing products around circular assets, reinforcing the connection between industrial operations and Sustainable Finance Canada.
Circular asset management is an unusual but highly positive combination of both financial discipline and environmental responsibility. It grants CFOs not only to increase capital efficiency, but also to make their balance sheets stronger and get more covered by asset-based financing as well. On the other hand, it gives Chief Sustainability Officers the very concrete ESG outcomes through waste and carbon intensity reduction which they have long been striving for.
Among the rapidly changing industrial and fintech landscape in Canada, the secondary market for Pharma equipment as well as Food processing machinery is no longer a second thought; it is a strategic advantage. While the Circular Economy is continuously changing the landscape of value creation, circular asset management is right at the crossroads of innovation,finance and sustainable growth.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Dec 17, 2025 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Scale and Partnerships
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
On December 11 2025, CapIntel announced a formal collaboration with KPMG Canada to support wealth management firms rolling out digital advisor and client tools, according to the company’s announcement. CapIntel says more than 20,000 wealth professionals across North America currently use its platform.
Buying technology rarely causes problems. Adoption does. Most of the friction shows up after procurement, when integration work begins and compliance teams step in. Tools that function well on their own often slow down once they enter legacy environments with uneven advisor workflows and strict oversight requirements.
Talking Point
CapIntel is pairing its advisor platform with delivery support to reduce adoption risk inside large wealth firms, while KPMG Canada continues to lean further into execution and integration work for digital wealth initiatives. Will this collaboration shorten rollout timelines enough to influence how enterprise wealth firms evaluate advisor technology vendors?
That pressure has been building inside large wealth management firms. Digital modernization still sits high on the agenda, but tolerance for long pilots and stalled rollouts has dropped. Senior teams want tools in daily use, not just sitting between approval and deployment. In enterprise and hybrid advisor models, inconsistent adoption creates operational and regulatory risk firms don’t want to carry.
Both organizations have been active elsewhere in fintech and wealth technology over the past year. CapIntel has continued to expand partnerships and publish advisor focused research tied to client communication and trust, while KPMG Canada has emphasized its role in digital modernization and implementation support for wealth firms navigating complex operating environments.
This collaboration brings delivery into the commercial discussion instead of leaving it for later. CapIntel is pairing its platform with implementation and change management support rather than assuming firms will solve execution internally. That matters when advisor tools touch regulated client communications and firm wide processes.
James Rockwood, Chief Executive Officer, CapIntel:
“Joining forces with KPMG strengthens our ability to deliver at scale for the enterprise wealth market. By combining KPMG’s integration and transformation capabilities with our platform’s powerful advisor tools, we’re helping clients realize the full value of their digital strategy faster.”
As wealth technology matures, differentiation increasingly shows up in execution rather than interface design. Feature sets tend to converge. Integration effort, advisor training, and governance alignment don’t. For large firms, disruption risk often outweighs incremental product improvements.
The real test is practical. Firms will be watching for named deployments, clear rollout timelines, and repeatable implementation results across advisor teams. If those surface, the collaboration will carry weight inside buying committees. If they don’t, it’s likely to stay a partnership on paper.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Regulation | December 15, 2025

AI generated image
On December 11, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) and the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) released new guidance for finfluencers, investment firms, and issuers on how securities laws apply to online investing activity (Download CSA and CIRO Staff Notice 31-369 13 page PDF). Social media now plays a real role in how Canadians make investment decisions, and regulators expect existing securities law to apply when online influence impacts behaviour. The guidance clarifies when creators must register, how disclosure must work in short-form content, what counts as advice or trading activity, and where firms and issuers remain responsible when they work with finfluencers. Keep reading to learn about the practical implications, including some use case examples covered in the report.
Regulators are responding to what they see in the market today. Social media is no longer a side channel for financial education. It is where many investors first encounter investment ideas, products, and promotions, often without realizing when education turns into influence.
As NCFA previously reported, based on the CSA's 2024 Investor Index, 53% of Canadian investors now use social media as a source of investment information. Among younger investors aged 18 to 24, reliance on social platforms is even higher. Those investors face materially higher risk.
The OSC also tests causation, not just correlation. In a controlled experiment involving 1,465 Canadians managing a simulated $10,000 portfolio, 38% of participants exposed to finfluencer style promotional posts purchased the promoted asset, compared with 8% in the control group. Exposure alone drives different investment choices, even without personalized advice.
Canadian securities regulators examined 87 finfluencers and 9 issuers and repeatedly found undisclosed compensation, promotional framing that functions as recommendations, and content drifting into advising or trading activity without registration.
The CSA and CIRO aren't introducing new rules. They are making it clear how existing securities law already applies when online content influences investment decisions. There's a clear message that Finfluencers should take seriously:
Labels and intent matter less than impact. What counts is how a reasonable investor experiences the content, not how the creator describes it.
Finfluencers need to register when they provide investment advice or help facilitate securities trading for a business purpose, unless a specific exemption applies.
A business purpose doesn't require a formal firm, a full-time role, or a registered brand. Regulators look at how the activity actually operates. Repetition, promotion, compensation, solicitation, and continuity over time all matter. Paid courses, subscription communities, affiliate arrangements, and recurring sponsored content often meet this threshold.
The guidance is explicit that finfluencers cannot avoid registration by saying their content is not advice. Disclaimers do not change how regulators assess the activity.
Investment advice includes opinions about the merits of investing in a specific business or security, as well as recommendations to buy or sell. The guidance notes that even promotional language or emojis that imply opportunity can be interpreted as recommendations.
Trading activity is defined broadly. It includes not only executing trades, but any act done in furtherance of a trade. The guidance specifically points to copycat trading enablement, such as linking followers who pay a subscription fee to replicate trades in a self-directed account. These lines are crossed more often than many creators realize.
Some finfluencers rely on the general advice exemption when providing broad and non-personalized commentary, however the regulator's guidance makes clear that this exemption is narrow and conditional.
If a finfluencer relies on it, they must clearly disclose any financial or other interest in the securities discussed. Financial or other interest is interpreted broadly and includes indirect incentives, compensation arrangements, and related party interests.
The exemption does not apply to trading activity. This distinction becomes critical when education is paired with transaction pathways.
Disclosure needs to be clear, prominent, and specific enough for an audience to understand the security involved, the incentive, who paid it, and who received it.
The guidance is direct about what fails. Statements like “I may have a financial interest” are not enough. Disclosure also fails when it is buried at the end of a video, hidden behind extra clicks, or written in a way viewers are unlikely to notice.
A simple acid test applies. If a viewer has to look for the disclosure, it likely does not meet expectations.
The example scenarios below highlight when creators drift into regulated activity without intending to. These aren't rare cases but common growth paths.
In one example, a creator starts with general investing education. That activity stays outside registration. When the creator adds buy and sell signals in a paid course, the activity becomes advising. When the creator begins answering personalized questions through comments and direct messages, charges fees, and scales tailored advice, registration becomes necessary or the activity needs to stop.
In a second example, a crypto-focused creator promotes a token without compensation. When that creator later joins an airdrop program tied to promotional tasks, the activity becomes compensated promotion. Disclosure obligations arise immediately and need to stay current. Linking to trading platforms and receiving payments from followers or platforms can also push the activity into trading facilitation.
In a third example, a creator promotes issuer securities for payment but hides the sponsorship because disclosure reduces engagement. Disclosure is buried behind “show more” links. Regulators treat this as a breach and move to enforcement. Not knowing the rules does not change the outcome.
Registered firms that work with finfluencers are expected to govern those relationships. That includes due diligence, written agreements, training, ongoing monitoring, and corrective action when content becomes misleading or non-compliant.
Order-execution-only dealers face added sensitivity. Because they cannot provide advice, regulators caution against indirectly enabling recommendations or registerable activity through referral arrangements, hosted content, outbound links, or copycat trading features.
For fintech platforms, this brings compliance into product design. Referral flows, creator landing pages, and trading enablement features all carry regulatory weight.
When issuers work with finfluencers, social media content counts as public disclosure. Issuers remain responsible for statements made on their behalf.
Regulators expect issuers to ensure content stays factual, balanced, consistent with filed disclosure, and clear about paid relationships. Issuers need to provide guidance and controls rather than leaving disclosure discipline to third parties.
Promotional shortcuts can surface later during diligence and capital raising.
Securities law applies regardless of whether content is created by a human, a digital avatar, or an AI system. Anyone deploying AI to generate investment related content remains responsible for that content as if they created it themselves.
For platforms experimenting with automated education or AI powered engagement, note that technology does not reduce accountability.
Finfluencer activity now sits firmly inside the regulatory perimeter. Data shows that influence impacts behaviour, and behaviour drives investment decisions. This new guidance gives founders, platforms, creators and issuers clarity. Teams that design content, monetization, referral flows, and product features with these expectations in mind can move faster with fewer surprises.
Teams that treat finfluencer activity as casual marketing often discover where the line sits only after they cross it. That is the practical message regulators are sending, and it is one the market needs to take seriously now.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
December 15, 2025

Image: Freepik/DC Studio
Hiring an external auditor is a major responsibility for any company—whether you're a fast-growing startup, a mid-size business, or a mature organization. The quality of your annual audit depends heavily on the auditor you choose. A strong external auditor brings credibility, compliance, and confidence. The wrong choice leads to delays, confusion, higher costs, and audit findings that could have been avoided.
To make the selection process easier, here is a complete checklist to help you hire the right external auditor, understand the documents involved, and know exactly what to expect throughout the process.
Before you begin searching, clarify your reasons for hiring an auditor. Common reasons include:
Understanding your purpose helps you choose an auditor with the right level of expertise.
External auditors will request documentation before quoting, planning, or starting the audit. Preparing these in advance saves time and makes the evaluation process smoother.
Financial Documents
Corporate Documents
Operational Documents
Having these ready demonstrates professionalism and speeds up the auditor selection process.
Choosing an auditor is not about selecting the cheapest quote—it’s about finding the right fit for your business.
a. Industry Experience
Does the auditor understand your business model?
For example:
Industry experience reduces questions, misunderstandings, and delays.
b. Audit Firm Size & Capacity
Ask yourself:
Choose a firm that matches your stage of growth.
c. Qualification & Accreditation
Ensure the auditors are certified:
These qualifications ensure professional standards and ethical compliance.
d. Communication Style
A responsive, clear communicator will make your audit experience much smoother.
Watch for:
If they’re slow during the proposal stage, they’ll be worse during the audit.
e. Technology & Tools
A modern audit firm should use:
This reduces paperwork and speeds up results.
f. Independence
External auditors must remain independent.
Avoid any firm that also handles:
Independence protects credibility.
Use these questions to evaluate the firm’s capability:
Audit Process & Planning
Team Structure
Fees
Experience
Technology
These questions help you assess both capability and professionalism.
A good auditor follows a structured and transparent approach.
The auditor will:
This sets the tone for the audit.
During fieldwork, auditors will:
Expect frequent communication and clarifications.
The auditor will raise questions or notes where:
Responding promptly keeps the audit on track.
Once testing is complete, the auditor prepares:
Your team reviews and finalizes the documents before signing.
After all issues are resolved, the auditor issues the final audited financial statements—ready for filing, investors, or lenders.
Be cautious if:
A thorough vetting process protects your business from future problems.
A standard annual audit typically takes:
However, delays occur if documents are missing or systems are disorganized—another reason to prepare early.
Hiring an external auditor is not just a compliance checkbox—it's a strategic step toward stronger financial reporting, better governance, and improved investor trust. With the right preparation, documentation, and evaluation process, you can choose an auditor who understands your business, communicates well, and completes your audit efficiently.
Use this complete checklist to guide your selection process and ensure your company’s annual audit is smooth, timely, and accurate.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Compliance | December 11, 2025

AI generated image
On December 10 2025 the CSA and CIRO released new findings from their second national review of Client Focused Reforms based on 105 firms. The update arrives in a year marked by a CSA record year of 1,011 investor alerts and outreach that reached more than 4.5 million Canadians.
With the imminent arrival of Canada's commercialization of open banking, and the country's work on faster payments and new digital asset rules, fintechs now face a more demanding compliance environment, and firms must focus on fixing gaps to prepare for what comes next.
Client Focused Reforms arrived in two stages across 2021. Conflicts of interest rules took effect in June 2021 and enhanced rules for know your client, know your product and suitability took effect at the end of 2021.
Regulators did a first sweep in 2022 to confirm whether firms built the foundation. They looked at updated forms, processes and governance. The first sweep focused on whether firms completed the initial implementation work required by the reforms rather than on how well those changes worked in daily practice.
The second sweep tests practical use. Firms have lived with these rules for more than three years. Regulators expected complete records, strong reasoning and evidence of care in client decisions.
Regulators found that some digital onboarding flows move too quickly for the level of detail the rules require.
They saw cases where firms collected risk tolerance but did not collect risk capacity.
They found broad financial ranges that did not support detailed decisions.
They found missing updates when clients changed jobs, retired or faced major life events.
They also saw records that did not show meaningful conversations with clients.
👉 Regulators want firms to gather clear and complete financial information and to treat risk tolerance and risk capacity as separate concepts. They expect client data to guide decisions, not follow them. They expect fintechs to show that a digital experience still produces real understanding.
Fintechs often use a select list of products, model portfolios or automated recommendations. Regulators looked closely at these choices and found cases where product review notes were thin or unclear.
They found approvals without evidence of analysis.
They found firms relying on affiliates even though each firm must complete its own review.
👉 Regulators want product evaluations that show how a firm reviewed the structure, features, risks and costs of a product before deciding to offer it to clients. This work guides what a firm chooses to place on its platform and how it ensures the product suits the clients who may use it. They want clear records that show why a product fits the platform and how the firm reached that decision. They expect firms to understand their products in a practical way and to document that understanding with simple and direct notes.
Suitability is where digital advice models face the most pressure. Regulators found decisions marked as suitable with little or no explanation.
They found missing concentration checks and liquidity checks.
They found limited cost comparison even when firms offered lower cost fund series.
They saw suitability records that did not update after product changes or after changes to the representative responsible for the account.
👉Regulators want suitability work that explains how the firm connected the client’s information to the recommendation. They want firms to consider exposure levels, liquidity needs, cost differences and alternatives. They want reasoning that shows why a recommendation or a model portfolio fits the client.
Fintechs can improve compliance by treating data, product analysis and suitability logic as design elements. Design and process can impact onboarding flows that gather clear information without slowing clients down.
Fintechs strengthen compliance when they update client profiles after major life events and use product files that link directly to real due diligence notes.
Clear concentration and liquidity checks inside the recommendation engine supports more reliable decisions.
Cost comparison helps firms show why a recommendation fits the client.
Investor education tools help clients understand their choices with more confidence.
Thoughtful use of AI can improve accuracy and consistency when firms understand which processes benefit most from automation.
Strong design choices make it easier to show good judgment and better care for clients.
The new CFR review arrives as Canada prepares for major changes in the financial system. Open banking will introduce structured data sharing and clearer expectations for permission and accuracy. Payments modernization will accelerate how money moves, supported by Canada’s payments innovation push toward faster rails. Digital asset rules will mature as Canada moves forward with the first draft of the national stablecoin framework.
These developments point in the same direction. Regulators expect firms to show strong reasoning, accurate information and clear documentation of decisions. Fintechs that build these strengths now will be able to handle the coming changes with confidence instead of surprise.
Good CFR practices support competitiveness and growth. Partners and investors look for firms that manage risk with care and clarity. Clients choose platforms they trust.
The CSA year in review reports 54 permanent bans imposed during the reporting period and 24 enforcement actions tied to crypto assets. This is why strong governance matters at a time when financial infrastructure is evolving.
Fintechs that build accurate data, consistent processes and quality supervision strengthen their position and gain credibility across the market.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |