Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
U.S. Senate Fails to Advance CLARITY Act 49 to 50
September 16, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Regulation And Policy, Competition And Market Structure
Ethics and Stablecoin Rules Complicate U.S. Crypto Bill
On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act by 49 votes to 50, with one senator not voting. This wasn't a vote on final passage of H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Senators were deciding whether the threshold of 60 votes needed to bring the legislation forward for Senate consideration, or not.
The official roll call lists Republicans Susan Collins, Josh Hawley, Jerry Moran and Thom Tillis among the 50 nays. Tillis changed his vote for procedural reasons and entered a motion to reconsider, preserving a way for the Senate to revisit cloture. Chris Coons of Delaware was the only senator recorded as not voting.
CLARITY would create a federal market structure for digital assets and draw clearer lines between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. By the time the bill reached this procedural vote, negotiations also covered political ethics, decentralized finance and whether stablecoin rewards could compete too directly with bank deposits.
Why CLARITY Fell Short of 60 Votes
Political ethics became the clearest documented barrier to Democratic support. On September 14, Republican sponsors released a final CLARITY Act draft that they said incorporated 126 substantive changes requested by Democrats. The revised text also adopted much of an ethics proposal developed by Tillis and Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego, including a role for state attorneys general in enforcement.
Democrats said the protections still didn't go far enough. In his Gallego CLARITY statement, Gallego said bipartisan negotiations was making progress on ethics before Republican leadership called the vote. Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren argued in her Warren CLARITY remarks that the bill still failed to address conflicts involving President Donald Trump's crypto interests adequately. Republican sponsors disputed that assessment and said they had already incorporated extensive Democratic requests.
The banking fight was different. Banks and digital asset firms disagree over how far payment stablecoins should be allowed to offer rewards that function economically like interest. If consumers transfer money from bank accounts into stablecoin products because the return is more attractive, banks argue they could lose deposits used to fund mortgages, small business credit and other lending.
Banking groups said the Senate draft still left room for interest like incentives tied to stablecoin balances, duration or tenure. They also objected to proposed stablecoin deposit safeguards that could allow Treasury action after payment stablecoins had already caused a substantial detrimental impact on community banks. Their concern is intervention after meaningful deposit losses may come too late to protect lending capacity.
How large that risk could become remains disputed. The White House Council of Economic Advisers published a stablecoin lending estimate suggesting that a full prohibition on yield would increase U.S. bank lending by about US$2.1 billion under its baseline assumptions, including roughly US$500 million at community banks. Banking groups have cited much larger estimates using different assumptions about stablecoin adoption, reserve flows and deposit substitution.
Stablecoins raise questions about competition as well as a crypto regulation. A digital dollar that can be held, transferred and rewarded can compete for customer balances that would otherwise remain inside banks. Rules governing stablecoin returns can affect funding costs, lending capacity and who controls the customer relationship.
Canada has already chosen a different approach on yield. The Canadian stablecoin framework prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield while requiring reserves equal to the value issued and redemption at face value. That alone doesn't eliminate competition between deposits and digital money, but it removes one of the incentives at the centre of the U.S. banking dispute.
CLARITY Is Stalled, With Negotiations Still Open
While the bill isn't dead, the September 15 vote leaves H.R. 3633 stalled before full Senate consideration. Tillis's procedural vote preserved reconsideration, while the Blockchain Association response said the industry group would keep working with both parties and pointed specifically to the reconsideration motion as a route back to the legislation.
As of September 16, no new CLARITY vote had been placed on the Senate floor schedule. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott said the SEC and CFTC should continue developing digital asset rules under their existing authority while Congress works on legislation. Founders, exchanges and investors therefore still have to follow agency rulemaking while the statutory division of authority is still unsettled.
Canada is working through some of the same product boundaries under a different regulatory structure. Finance Canada says the Canadian stablecoin framework has received Royal Assent, with regulations being developed ahead of expected implementation in 2027. On September 10, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions also clarified that tokenized bank deposits remain deposits in law even when the technology used to represent them changes.
That guidance affects how Canadian financial firms build digital money products. A tokenized bank deposit remains part of a bank's balance sheet and funding model, while a fiat backed stablecoin issued outside a bank is a separate claim backed by reserve assets. Both can compete for payment, treasury and customer balance uses, but their economics and regulatory obligations differ.
Three Market Developments to Watch
- The SEC is advancing crypto fundraising rules covering offerings of up to US$5 million and US$75 million while Congress continues debating market structure
- Wells Fargo plans to offer corporate clients tokenized commercial deposits, adding another regulated bank model for digital settlement
- Canadian and international banks are developing stablecoin and tokenized money products while governments decide how those products should compete with conventional deposits
If CLARITY returns to the Senate floor, changing the boundary between the SEC and CFTC alone won't resolve the coalition problem exposed by the 49 to 50 vote. Lawmakers still have to find common ground on political ethics and decide how far stablecoin rewards can go before they become deposit like competition for banks.
Those choices and their outcomes directly impact fintech business models. Stablecoin yield affects customer acquisition and funding economics. SEC and CFTC jurisdiction can alter registration, trading and capital raising requirements. Political ethics provisions may be separate from product design, yet the September vote shows they can determine whether the legislation reaches full Senate consideration at all.
Talking Point
CLARITY was designed to clarify who regulates U.S. digital assets, but the Senate vote exposed a larger commercial question. If stablecoins compete with bank deposits while crypto legislation also raises unresolved political ethics concerns, how much of digital asset market structure can Congress settle without also deciding who gets to compete for money, credit and financial influence?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
Leave a Reply