Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: Regtech, Compliance, Governance
CSA and CIRO Set Clear Rules for Finfluencers
Regulation | December 15, 2025
AI generated image
Canadian Regulators Clarify How Finfluencer Activity Triggers Securities Law
On December 11, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) and the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) released new guidance for finfluencers, investment firms, and issuers on how securities laws apply to online investing activity (Download CSA and CIRO Staff Notice 31-369 13 page PDF). Social media now plays a real role in how Canadians make investment decisions, and regulators expect existing securities law to apply when online influence impacts behaviour. The guidance clarifies when creators must register, how disclosure must work in short-form content, what counts as advice or trading activity, and where firms and issuers remain responsible when they work with finfluencers. Keep reading to learn about the practical implications, including some use case examples covered in the report.
Why Regulators Are Tightening Expectations Now
Regulators are responding to what they see in the market today. Social media is no longer a side channel for financial education. It is where many investors first encounter investment ideas, products, and promotions, often without realizing when education turns into influence.
As NCFA previously reported, based on the CSA's 2024 Investor Index, 53% of Canadian investors now use social media as a source of investment information. Among younger investors aged 18 to 24, reliance on social platforms is even higher. Those investors face materially higher risk.
- 35% of surveyed investors report making a financial decision based on finfluencer content
- 12.2 times more likely to report being scammed on social media
- 2.3 times more likely to have experienced a significant investment loss, and
- 3.1 times less likely to work with a licensed financial advisor
The OSC also tests causation, not just correlation. In a controlled experiment involving 1,465 Canadians managing a simulated $10,000 portfolio, 38% of participants exposed to finfluencer style promotional posts purchased the promoted asset, compared with 8% in the control group. Exposure alone drives different investment choices, even without personalized advice.
Canadian securities regulators examined 87 finfluencers and 9 issuers and repeatedly found undisclosed compensation, promotional framing that functions as recommendations, and content drifting into advising or trading activity without registration.
The CSA and CIRO aren't introducing new rules. They are making it clear how existing securities law already applies when online content influences investment decisions. There's a clear message that Finfluencers should take seriously:
Labels and intent matter less than impact. What counts is how a reasonable investor experiences the content, not how the creator describes it.
When Finfluencers Need to Register
Finfluencers need to register when they provide investment advice or help facilitate securities trading for a business purpose, unless a specific exemption applies.
See: The Finfluencer Effect on Canadian Retail Investors
A business purpose doesn't require a formal firm, a full-time role, or a registered brand. Regulators look at how the activity actually operates. Repetition, promotion, compensation, solicitation, and continuity over time all matter. Paid courses, subscription communities, affiliate arrangements, and recurring sponsored content often meet this threshold.
The guidance is explicit that finfluencers cannot avoid registration by saying their content is not advice. Disclaimers do not change how regulators assess the activity.
What Counts as Advice and Trading Activity
Investment advice includes opinions about the merits of investing in a specific business or security, as well as recommendations to buy or sell. The guidance notes that even promotional language or emojis that imply opportunity can be interpreted as recommendations.
Trading activity is defined broadly. It includes not only executing trades, but any act done in furtherance of a trade. The guidance specifically points to copycat trading enablement, such as linking followers who pay a subscription fee to replicate trades in a self-directed account. These lines are crossed more often than many creators realize.
The General Advice Exemption Is Limited
Some finfluencers rely on the general advice exemption when providing broad and non-personalized commentary, however the regulator's guidance makes clear that this exemption is narrow and conditional.
If a finfluencer relies on it, they must clearly disclose any financial or other interest in the securities discussed. Financial or other interest is interpreted broadly and includes indirect incentives, compensation arrangements, and related party interests.
See: Bridging Canada’s Advice Gap with Global Insights
The exemption does not apply to trading activity. This distinction becomes critical when education is paired with transaction pathways.
What Proper Disclosure Looks Like in Practice
Disclosure needs to be clear, prominent, and specific enough for an audience to understand the security involved, the incentive, who paid it, and who received it.
The guidance is direct about what fails. Statements like “I may have a financial interest” are not enough. Disclosure also fails when it is buried at the end of a video, hidden behind extra clicks, or written in a way viewers are unlikely to notice.
A simple acid test applies. If a viewer has to look for the disclosure, it likely does not meet expectations.
Examples of Creators, Firms Crossing the Line
The example scenarios below highlight when creators drift into regulated activity without intending to. These aren't rare cases but common growth paths.
In one example, a creator starts with general investing education. That activity stays outside registration. When the creator adds buy and sell signals in a paid course, the activity becomes advising. When the creator begins answering personalized questions through comments and direct messages, charges fees, and scales tailored advice, registration becomes necessary or the activity needs to stop.
See: Lena Dunham’s SBF Film & Finance Pop Culture
In a second example, a crypto-focused creator promotes a token without compensation. When that creator later joins an airdrop program tied to promotional tasks, the activity becomes compensated promotion. Disclosure obligations arise immediately and need to stay current. Linking to trading platforms and receiving payments from followers or platforms can also push the activity into trading facilitation.
In a third example, a creator promotes issuer securities for payment but hides the sponsorship because disclosure reduces engagement. Disclosure is buried behind “show more” links. Regulators treat this as a breach and move to enforcement. Not knowing the rules does not change the outcome.
What Firms Need to Do Before Working With Finfluencers
Registered firms that work with finfluencers are expected to govern those relationships. That includes due diligence, written agreements, training, ongoing monitoring, and corrective action when content becomes misleading or non-compliant.
Order-execution-only dealers face added sensitivity. Because they cannot provide advice, regulators caution against indirectly enabling recommendations or registerable activity through referral arrangements, hosted content, outbound links, or copycat trading features.
For fintech platforms, this brings compliance into product design. Referral flows, creator landing pages, and trading enablement features all carry regulatory weight.
What Issuers Remain Responsible For
When issuers work with finfluencers, social media content counts as public disclosure. Issuers remain responsible for statements made on their behalf.
Regulators expect issuers to ensure content stays factual, balanced, consistent with filed disclosure, and clear about paid relationships. Issuers need to provide guidance and controls rather than leaving disclosure discipline to third parties.
See: The Finfluencer Effect on Canadian Retail Investors
Promotional shortcuts can surface later during diligence and capital raising.
How AI and Digital Influencers Are Treated
Securities law applies regardless of whether content is created by a human, a digital avatar, or an AI system. Anyone deploying AI to generate investment related content remains responsible for that content as if they created it themselves.
For platforms experimenting with automated education or AI powered engagement, note that technology does not reduce accountability.
Why This Matters
Finfluencer activity now sits firmly inside the regulatory perimeter. Data shows that influence impacts behaviour, and behaviour drives investment decisions. This new guidance gives founders, platforms, creators and issuers clarity. Teams that design content, monetization, referral flows, and product features with these expectations in mind can move faster with fewer surprises.
Read: New CFR Review Highlights Gaps Fintechs Must Close
Teams that treat finfluencer activity as casual marketing often discover where the line sits only after they cross it. That is the practical message regulators are sending, and it is one the market needs to take seriously now.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
The Complete Checklist for Hiring an External Auditor for Your Company’s Annual Audit
December 15, 2025
Image: Freepik/DC Studio
Hiring an external auditor is a major responsibility for any company—whether you're a fast-growing startup, a mid-size business, or a mature organization. The quality of your annual audit depends heavily on the auditor you choose. A strong external auditor brings credibility, compliance, and confidence. The wrong choice leads to delays, confusion, higher costs, and audit findings that could have been avoided.
To make the selection process easier, here is a complete checklist to help you hire the right external auditor, understand the documents involved, and know exactly what to expect throughout the process.
1. Know Why You Need an External Auditor
Before you begin searching, clarify your reasons for hiring an auditor. Common reasons include:
- Statutory compliance requirements
- Investor expectations
- Loan or banking requirements
- Preparing for fundraising or acquisition
- Strengthening financial transparency
Understanding your purpose helps you choose an auditor with the right level of expertise.
2. Documents You Need Ready Before Hiring
External auditors will request documentation before quoting, planning, or starting the audit. Preparing these in advance saves time and makes the evaluation process smoother.
Financial Documents
- Trial balance
- General ledger
- Chart of accounts
- Previous year’s audited financial statements
- Bank statements and reconciliations
- Accounts receivable and payable reports
- Sales and purchase registers
- Expense reports
- Cash-flow statements
Corporate Documents
- Incorporation certificate
- Board resolutions
- Shareholding structure and cap table
- Contracts with customers and vendors
- Loan agreements or debt documents
Operational Documents
- Inventory records
- Payroll summaries
- Fixed asset register
- Internal control policies (if available)
Having these ready demonstrates professionalism and speeds up the auditor selection process.
3. Evaluate External Auditors Using These Criteria
Choosing an auditor is not about selecting the cheapest quote—it’s about finding the right fit for your business.
a. Industry Experience
Does the auditor understand your business model?
For example:
- SaaS revenue recognition differs from e-commerce
- Manufacturing inventory systems require specialized expertise
Industry experience reduces questions, misunderstandings, and delays.
b. Audit Firm Size & Capacity
Ask yourself:
- Do they have enough staff for timely completion?
- Will your company receive senior-level attention?
- Do they work with companies of similar size and complexity?
Choose a firm that matches your stage of growth.
c. Qualification & Accreditation
Ensure the auditors are certified:
- CA (India)
- CPA or ACCA (International)
These qualifications ensure professional standards and ethical compliance.
d. Communication Style
A responsive, clear communicator will make your audit experience much smoother.
Watch for:
- Prompt replies
- Clear explanations
- Proactive updates
If they’re slow during the proposal stage, they’ll be worse during the audit.
e. Technology & Tools
A modern audit firm should use:
- Data analytics
- Cloud file-sharing
- Automated workflows
- Digital audit software
This reduces paperwork and speeds up results.
f. Independence
External auditors must remain independent.
Avoid any firm that also handles:
- Financial decision-making
- Internal controls design
- Certain consulting functions
Independence protects credibility.
4. Questions to Ask Before Hiring an Auditor
Use these questions to evaluate the firm’s capability:
Audit Process & Planning
- What is your typical audit timeline?
- How do you handle planning and risk assessment?
- What documentation do you require upfront?
Team Structure
- Who will be leading the audit?
- How experienced are the team members?
- Will there be continuity year-over-year?
Fees
- What is included in your quoted fee?
- Are there any additional charges for extra work?
- How do you handle changes in scope?
Experience
- Do you have clients in the same industry?
- Can you share references or case studies?
Technology
- How do you ensure data security?
- Which tools do you use for audit testing?
These questions help you assess both capability and professionalism.
5. What to Expect Once the Audit Begins
A good auditor follows a structured and transparent approach.
a. Audit Planning & Kick-Off
The auditor will:
- Discuss timelines
- Assess business risks
- Understand your processes
- Request initial documentation
This sets the tone for the audit.
b. Fieldwork & Testing
During fieldwork, auditors will:
- Verify transactions
- Perform sample testing
- Review internal controls
- Match records with supporting documents
- Analyze financial trends
Expect frequent communication and clarifications.
c. Query Resolution
The auditor will raise questions or notes where:
- Documentation is missing
- Numbers don’t tie up
- Controls appear weak
Responding promptly keeps the audit on track.
e. Audit Report Preparation
Once testing is complete, the auditor prepares:
- Draft audit report
- Management letter (if issues are found)
Your team reviews and finalizes the documents before signing.
f. Final Sign-Off
After all issues are resolved, the auditor issues the final audited financial statements—ready for filing, investors, or lenders.
6. Red Flags During Auditor Selection
Be cautious if:
- The firm quotes extremely low fees (often signals poor quality)
- They avoid discussing audit methodology
- They refuse to share references
- Communication is slow or unclear
- They lack industry experience
- They seem overly eager to agree with everything
See: New CFR Review Highlights Gaps Fintechs Must Close
A thorough vetting process protects your business from future problems.
7. Timeline Expectations
A standard annual audit typically takes:
Planning: 1–2 weeks
Fieldwork: 2–4 weeks
Finalization: 1–2 weeks
However, delays occur if documents are missing or systems are disorganized—another reason to prepare early.
Conclusion
Hiring an external auditor is not just a compliance checkbox—it's a strategic step toward stronger financial reporting, better governance, and improved investor trust. With the right preparation, documentation, and evaluation process, you can choose an auditor who understands your business, communicates well, and completes your audit efficiently.
Use this complete checklist to guide your selection process and ensure your company’s annual audit is smooth, timely, and accurate.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
New CFR Review Highlights Gaps Fintechs Must Close
Compliance | December 11, 2025
AI generated image
CSA and CIRO Guide Fintechs Where to Strengthen KYC, KYP and Suitability
On December 10 2025 the CSA and CIRO released new findings from their second national review of Client Focused Reforms based on 105 firms. The update arrives in a year marked by a CSA record year of 1,011 investor alerts and outreach that reached more than 4.5 million Canadians.
With the imminent arrival of Canada's commercialization of open banking, and the country's work on faster payments and new digital asset rules, fintechs now face a more demanding compliance environment, and firms must focus on fixing gaps to prepare for what comes next.
Two Client Focused Reform Sweeps
Client Focused Reforms arrived in two stages across 2021. Conflicts of interest rules took effect in June 2021 and enhanced rules for know your client, know your product and suitability took effect at the end of 2021.
Regulators did a first sweep in 2022 to confirm whether firms built the foundation. They looked at updated forms, processes and governance. The first sweep focused on whether firms completed the initial implementation work required by the reforms rather than on how well those changes worked in daily practice.
The second sweep tests practical use. Firms have lived with these rules for more than three years. Regulators expected complete records, strong reasoning and evidence of care in client decisions.
What Regulators Found In Fintech KYC Work
Regulators found that some digital onboarding flows move too quickly for the level of detail the rules require.
They saw cases where firms collected risk tolerance but did not collect risk capacity.
They found broad financial ranges that did not support detailed decisions.
See: CSA Review of EMD Selling Groups Exemption
They found missing updates when clients changed jobs, retired or faced major life events.
They also saw records that did not show meaningful conversations with clients.
👉 Regulators want firms to gather clear and complete financial information and to treat risk tolerance and risk capacity as separate concepts. They expect client data to guide decisions, not follow them. They expect fintechs to show that a digital experience still produces real understanding.
What Regulators Expect From Fintech Product Due Diligence
Fintechs often use a select list of products, model portfolios or automated recommendations. Regulators looked closely at these choices and found cases where product review notes were thin or unclear.
They found approvals without evidence of analysis.
They found firms relying on affiliates even though each firm must complete its own review.
👉 Regulators want product evaluations that show how a firm reviewed the structure, features, risks and costs of a product before deciding to offer it to clients. This work guides what a firm chooses to place on its platform and how it ensures the product suits the clients who may use it. They want clear records that show why a product fits the platform and how the firm reached that decision. They expect firms to understand their products in a practical way and to document that understanding with simple and direct notes.
What Regulators Look For In Fintech Suitability Decisions
Suitability is where digital advice models face the most pressure. Regulators found decisions marked as suitable with little or no explanation.
They found missing concentration checks and liquidity checks.
They found limited cost comparison even when firms offered lower cost fund series.
See: CSA Proposes $50K Harmonized Self Certified Investor Exemption
They saw suitability records that did not update after product changes or after changes to the representative responsible for the account.
👉Regulators want suitability work that explains how the firm connected the client’s information to the recommendation. They want firms to consider exposure levels, liquidity needs, cost differences and alternatives. They want reasoning that shows why a recommendation or a model portfolio fits the client.
How Fintechs Can Close These Gaps With Better Design
Fintechs can improve compliance by treating data, product analysis and suitability logic as design elements. Design and process can impact onboarding flows that gather clear information without slowing clients down.
Fintechs strengthen compliance when they update client profiles after major life events and use product files that link directly to real due diligence notes.
Clear concentration and liquidity checks inside the recommendation engine supports more reliable decisions.
See: Mycroft Raises $3.5M for Agentic AI Compliance Officer
Cost comparison helps firms show why a recommendation fits the client.
Investor education tools help clients understand their choices with more confidence.
Thoughtful use of AI can improve accuracy and consistency when firms understand which processes benefit most from automation.
Strong design choices make it easier to show good judgment and better care for clients.
Why Fintechs Need To Get Ready For What Comes Next
The new CFR review arrives as Canada prepares for major changes in the financial system. Open banking will introduce structured data sharing and clearer expectations for permission and accuracy. Payments modernization will accelerate how money moves, supported by Canada’s payments innovation push toward faster rails. Digital asset rules will mature as Canada moves forward with the first draft of the national stablecoin framework.
These developments point in the same direction. Regulators expect firms to show strong reasoning, accurate information and clear documentation of decisions. Fintechs that build these strengths now will be able to handle the coming changes with confidence instead of surprise.
See: Crypto Enters the Core of Canadian Payments
Good CFR practices support competitiveness and growth. Partners and investors look for firms that manage risk with care and clarity. Clients choose platforms they trust.
The CSA year in review reports 54 permanent bans imposed during the reporting period and 24 enforcement actions tied to crypto assets. This is why strong governance matters at a time when financial infrastructure is evolving.
Fintechs that build accurate data, consistent processes and quality supervision strengthen their position and gain credibility across the market.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
$7.5 Billion Microsoft AI Buildout In Canada
December 10, 2025
Image: Freepik/DC Studio
Microsoft Expands AI Investment As Canada Prepares Sovereignty Rules for 2026
On December 9 2025, Microsoft Canada announced, 'the most important commitment in Microsoft Canada's history" or a total of $19 billion CAD to be invested into artificial intelligence (AI), including more than $7.5 billion CAD in the next two years inside Canada Central near Toronto and Canada East in Quebec. This anchors Canada inside Microsoft’s global AI buildout at a scale the country has never seen, one not of a secondary cloud market but as a strategic production region where infrastructure, talent and sovereignty all matter.
New capacity begins coming online in the second half of 2026. Microsoft aligned the buildout with a five point digital sovereignty plan for Canada that includes a (1) Threat Intelligence Hub in Ottawa, (2) confidential computing, (3) expanded data residency, (4) sovereign landing zones for AI deployment and (5) contractual protections designed to keep Canadian customer data under Canadian legal authority.
See: Canada Risks Falling Behind as UK Lands AI Megadeals
For Canada’s innovation economy, it accelerates product velocity for companies that rely on domestic compute, it may also impact how investors evaluate technical risk and strengthens (or weakens) Canada’s bargaining position at a time when the country is rewriting its AI and Buy Canadian strategies. It also raises a wider question: if Microsoft is prepared to make a commitment at this scale, what might other global AI giants like Google now offer Canada, and what terms should Canada set to ensure digital sovereignty instead of deepening dependence?
Canada Building a New AI Strategy for 2026
The federal government launched an AI Strategy Task Force and consultation in September 2025 to define the next national AI strategy. This consultation covers research, compute, governance, commercialization and public sector adoption. Also, Budget 2025 outlines a sovereign AI compute plan that includes a Sovereign Canadian Cloud and large scale public infrastructure investments, including $925.6 million commitment over five years.
AI Minister Evan Solomon recently spoke at a 111 event indicating that the feds are considering buy Canadian AI strategies to launch in 2026, linking federal funding and procurement to domestic infrastructure and model options.
The timing of Microsoft's investment may be linked to the federal government's buy Canadian strategy push, which gives policymakers a bit of leverage. Regardless with the new investment, Canada can now write a strategy that strengthens domestic options instead of reinforcing long term dependence on external providers without their long term commitment.
See: CEO Exits as GitHub Absorbed into Microsoft’s CoreAI
While Microsoft’s expansion strengthens Azure Canada Central and Canada East, with new capacity starting in 2026, it's important to point out that more compute doesn't eliminate all constraints. Provinces decide how quickly companies can expand existing datacentres because they control power availability, grid upgrades and the local approvals needed to support more energy use. Newfoundland utility as an example shows how provincial decisions can limit digital infrastructure growth, as it recently decided not to provide additional power to Blockchain Labrador Corporation. Ottawa can design rules for sovereign compute, but delivery depends on power systems and local permitting in Ontario, Quebec and any province that hosts future datacentres.
Sovereignty Debate Around AI Expansion
Digital sovereignty concerns were well established before Microsoft’s announcement. CIGI’s analysis of Canada’s digital dependence warns that foreign controlled cloud and platform infrastructure creates structural exposure across data, security, competition and resilience. Open Media outlined similar risks in an open letter on digital sovereignty to Prime Minister Carney that calls for domestic control over digital infrastructure and cautions against deepening dependence on foreign platform operators. The Broadbent Institute’s digital sovereignty briefing highlights how Canada’s information infrastructure is dominated by United States firms and stresses the importance of Canadian control over critical digital systems. NCFA added a fintech and digital identity angle in its Digital Public Infrastructure red flags analysis, providing a real case how outsourcing identity and authentication layers can narrow competitive space and weaken democratic oversight.
Microsoft’s announcement responds to these pressures with it's 5 point sovereignty plan for Canada which includes data residency commitments, confidential computing, in country processing for Copilot interactions, sovereign landing zones and a Threat Intelligence Hub in Ottawa.
See: Bezos Co-Leads New Project Prometheus AI Venture
The sovereignty debate is no longer theoretical. It is now a negotiation between public strategy, foreign capital, regulatory expectations and domestic ecosystem needs.
Strategic Implications
Microsoft’s investment changes how Canadian teams get the compute they need and how they plan products that must work inside regulated markets. With this level of commitment, Canada gains more domestic compute capacity and better tools to support sovereignty goals, but this infrastructure still sits inside foreign owned systems. The real impact is that Canadian teams now have a clearer path to scale at home while policymakers work to ensure these services strengthen, rather than weaken, Canada’s digital sovereignty.
For founders and investors, this creates room to build products that rely on local residency, stronger governance and efficient reasoning models suitable for regulated markets. Banks, fintechs, insurers and public institutions increasingly expect AI systems that can be audited and explained. Founders who anchor their products in these expectations will move faster across procurement and face fewer barriers in international markets that value trust and oversight. Companies that design for portability, auditability and resilience will avoid dependency traps and scale on terms that align with Canada’s sovereignty goals.
Public reporting shows that Microsoft is partnering with Cohere to offer its AI models on Azure, giving firms access to a domestic model supplier with global reach.
Canada now has conditions to build globally competitive AI companies that remain Canadian-controlled but the challenge is execution, governance and choosing business models that turn this new leverage into lasting advantage rather than repeating old patterns of dependence.
Why It Matters
Microsoft’s investment places Canada inside a global race where compute, data control and strategic partnerships now determine who leads the next decade of AI. Canada’s advantage won't come from capacity alone, but from how Canada uses the moment to set clear rules for trustworthy AI, support efficient model development and give Canadian companies a stable foundation to scale without leaving the country for infrastructure or capital.
Read: How Fintechs Can Build Enterprise AI Agents with Cohere
The next step is about deciding what Canada expects from any global partner. If Microsoft is prepared to invest at this scale, other AI giants may come forward with their own proposals. Canada’s job is to ensure that any future deal strengthens domestic capability, expands Canadian control over critical technology and avoids locking in long term partnerships that limit competitiveness across sectors.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
How Canadians Can Protect Their Wealth During Market Downturns Using Tax Strategy
December 9, 2025
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
Market volatility is unsettling when your retirement plans, investment portfolios, and business growth depend on stability. But there is a silver lining to market downturns: tax strategy is one of the few tools Canadians can actively control. Proper planning softens losses and positions wealth to recover faster and potentially grow when markets rebound.
Capital Loss Planning That Works for You
When investments fall below their adjusted cost base, strategic selling can unlock capital losses. These losses are not wasted. They can be used to offset capital gains realized in the year or carried back three years to recover taxes already paid. If gains are scarce in a tax year, unused losses can carry forward indefinitely. The timing matters, though. Superficial loss rules prevent claiming a loss when a substantially identical investment is repurchased within 30 days in affiliated accounts. Canadians who want to maintain exposure often turn to alternative holdings that provide similar market exposure without triggering compliance problems.
Thoughtful loss harvesting can also enhance portfolio rebalancing. Crystallizing losses during downturns allows investors to re-enter positions with a cleaner tax slate once the market recovers, turning an otherwise painful decline into a strategic asset.
Using Professional Advice to Make Tax Law Work for You
Most Canadians benefit from expert guidance at this stage. Market downturns interact with tax laws in ways that are not always intuitive, and navigating capital losses, superficial loss rules, and timing strategies requires strict adherence to tax laws. Guidance from the finance and investing tax lawyers at TaxLawyer.com provides the legal and structural clarity you need to make these moves confidently, especially for higher net worth individuals, incorporated professionals, and multi-asset investors.
Income Splitting and Pension Planning During Volatility
Downmarkets often shift household income levels, which creates planning opportunities. Spousal RRSPs, pension income splitting for retirees, and prescribed rate loans to family members can reduce tax burdens when incomes are uneven. Lower-income years allow individuals to withdraw from registered accounts, intentionally triggering taxable income at favourable rates. This strategy can prevent future tax burdens when both market performance and account values recover.
Meanwhile, dividend income generated in a spouse’s lower tax bracket preserves cash flow, provides flexibility during downturns, and improves overall household tax efficiency. Even modest reallocation between spouses can significantly change the after-tax outcome over time.
RRSP, FHSA, and TFSA Contributions Still Matter
A downturn magnifies the value of tax-advantaged accounts. RRSP contributions generate deductions now, deferring tax until retirement, when many Canadians expect to be in a lower bracket. TFSAs, however, offer permanent tax-free growth that shines in volatile markets. Reinvesting within a TFSA after markets decline allows any recovery to occur shielded from taxation.
Canadians planning for a first home should consider the First Home Savings Account. Even in weak housing or investment markets, FHSA contributions provide deduction benefits similar to RRSPs, while later withdrawals can be tax-free when used for a qualifying home purchase. The compounding effect of contributing during a downturn can accelerate future purchasing power.
Corporate Structures, Passive Income, and Loss Utilization
For incorporated business owners, downturns generate planning windows that rarely exist in expansion periods. Lower business values can make estate freezes more tax efficient, transferring future growth to the next generation at today’s depressed valuations. Corporate reorganization can also be more favourable when passive income streams dip below thresholds that normally reduce the small business deduction.
Losses at the corporate level can carry back or carry forward to reduce taxes in profitable years. Strategic alignment between corporate and personal tax planning allows owners to weather downturns while positioning their businesses for a faster recovery.
Charitable Giving and Philanthropy as Strategic Moves
Donating publicly traded securities with unrealized gains remains one of the most effective strategies. Even in volatile markets, this eliminates capital gains tax while generating donation credits that reduce personal or corporate tax.
See: How Much Economic Freedom Canada Needs To Compete
For investors with charitable goals, downturns present an opportunity to reset holdings while achieving philanthropic objectives.
Turning Uncertainty into Control
Market downturns are intimidating, but they rarely last forever. Tax planning transforms uncertainty into a toolkit for resilience. Smart strategy does not stop the storm, but it helps to ensure that you are better positioned to thrive once calmer conditions return.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Canadian Fintech Tuhk Raises US$6M Seed Round
Funding | December 8, 2025
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
Tuhk Building Global Collaboration Network for Payment Fraud Prevention
On December 8 2025, Canadian payment fraud fintech Tuhk announced a US$6 million seed round led by FINTOP (US), with particiation from Lloyds Banking Group (UK), and Capital One Ventures (US), to transform fragmented information into a shared intelligence network that improves approval rates, reduces disputes, and strengthens real time decisioning for financial institutions and merchants.
Tuhk is planning an imminent launch in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada and is offering an early access program while it refines its product ahead of the broader rollout, which you can confirm on the Tuhk early access page.
See: Rising Threats: The Global Impact of Push Payment Fraud
Andre Edelbrock, Tuhk Co-Founder and CEO:
"This funding round represents an important milestone for Tuhk, and we are grateful for the support from partners like Lloyds Banking Group, Capital One Ventures, and FINTOP. With these resources, we look forward to expanding the platform's reach and delivering practical, scalable solutions that strengthen the global payments ecosystem."
Investors Back Large Global Fraud Problem
Cybersecurity Ventures projects global cybercrime losses at US$10.5 trillion in 2025. This projection appears in the cybercrime cost estimate report. The figure includes financial loss from fraud, digital attacks, and misuse across global markets.
The scale of the projected loss shows the size of the problem that payment systems, banks, merchants, and financial platforms must work collaboratively to address in real-time, rather than isolated tools.
Launch Expertise And Leadership
The release says Tuhk’s founding team includes veterans of Ethoca and NuData Security, two Canadian companies that helped define collaboration based fraud intelligence before Mastercard acquired NuData Security in 2017 and then acquired Ethoca in 2019.
Tuhk builds on this experience as it prepares for a full commercial launch in early 2026. The company named Andre Edelbrock as CEO and appointed Stewart McIntosh as Chief Revenue Officer to lead global commercial strategy.
Outlook
Tuhk's US$6 million funding will go a long way as the company prepares to show financial institutions and merchants that by working together in sharing real-time shared fraud intelligence, improves approval accuracy, reduces misuse, and strengthens fraud outcomes for institutions that manage rising digital payment volumes.
Read: How Fintech Teams Move From Tools To Agents
Lloyds Banking Group framed the direction clearly saying that “collaboration is the only way we combat the increasing global threat of fraud and stop it from happening in the first place.”
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
OPC Launches Review of PIPEDA Guidance Development
Privacy | Dec 4, 2025
OPC Guidance Modernization Reaches A Turning Point
On December 2 2025, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) launched a guidance modernization consultation to gather feedback on how it should create future guidance for organizations under PIPEDA. The announcement links to the Draft Policy on PIPEDA Guidance Consultations, which sets out the proposed structure for selecting topics, engaging stakeholders and updating guidance.
See: Grok Leak Triggers Global AI Privacy Alarm
This consultation is important to fintechs and financial institutions alike because OPC guidance influences how teams design onboarding, identity flows, cross-border data use, fraud controls and AI supported systems.
Timeline and Path Leading to This Consultation
The OPC has worked on several major guidance projects over the past decade. Some produced clear final documents. Others exposed pressure points where guidance needed stronger processes, clearer wording or more predictable updates. The timeline below isn't exhaustive but shows past steps that now impact the need for modernization.
| Year | Event | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | OPC consultation on consent under PIPEDA | OPC reviews whether the consent model still works as data practices become more complex, including issues such as unclear notices and bundled consent. |
| 2018 | Guidelines for obtaining meaningful consent | OPC publishes final consent guidelines with clear expectations for transparency, user understanding and risk disclosure. These guidelines impact how organizations explain data practices. |
| 2019 | Consultation on transfers for processing and OPC announcement concluding the consultation | OPC tests possible changes to cross border processing guidance. After significant feedback, OPC confirms it will maintain the existing model for consent and accountability. |
| 2023 | Request for input on draft biometrics guidance and biometrics consultation notice | OPC seeks views on how organizations should handle biometric information, including expectations for assessments, safeguards and governance. |
| 2023–24 | OPC Departmental Plan reference to a guidance modernization project | OPC confirms it is building a structured and scalable approach to guidance development. |
| 2025 May | Exploratory consultation on a children’s privacy code | OPC explores principles for a possible children’s privacy code and gathers feedback from a wide range of stakeholders. |
| 2025 Aug | Final biometrics guidance for organizations | OPC publishes final biometrics guidance with expectations for sensitivity, safeguards, retention and governance. |
| 2025 Dec | Consultation on guidance modernization and Draft Policy on PIPEDA Guidance Consultations | OPC launches a public consultation on how it will plan and run future guidance consultations. |
What The Consultation Covers
The OPC launched this consultation to create a predictable structure for guidance development that follows clear steps from topic selection to final publication. The Draft Policy on PIPEDA Guidance Consultations sets out the proposed framework, which covers how the OPC will choose topics, engage stakeholders, review submissions and update guidance over time. The policy confirms that the OPC will provide discussion papers or draft text during consultations, outline the scope of each consultation and publish summaries that explain how input influenced the final document.
The draft policy describes the types of guidance it aims to improve, including interpretation documents, practical expectations for organizations and updates to guidance when law or technology changes. It also explains that the OPC may prioritize topics based on new risks, trends in complaints or changes in legislation, such areas as consent, cross border data use, artificial intelligence and children’s privacy that may require future guidance work. Biometrics already has final guidance but the OPC may revisit that topic if new risks or technologies emerge.
The OPC invites comments by email at cpvp-opcconsultation1@priv.gc.ca until deadline March 13, 2026. Submissions can respond to the draft policy or request updates to current guidance. The OPC welcomes input from any organization that operates under PIPEDA and wants a more consistent and transparent consultation process.
What This Means For Fintech
Fintech firms work with sensitive data across complex vendor chains. They rely on predictable regulatory expectations to design products and manage risk. This consultation matters because it affects several core fintech operations, for example:
Onboarding and identity verification. Clear guidance influences how fintech teams design consent flows, collect identity documents, use biometrics for fraud controls and explain risks to users.
See: Ensuring Data Privacy in AI-Driven ID Scanning: Balancing Innovation and Compliance
Cross border data transfers. Fintechs depend on cloud services, payment networks and global providers. The 2019 transfers consultation showed how uncertainty about these transfers can raise operational and legal risk. A structured guidance process helps firms plan ahead.
AI and risk models. As firms use AI for underwriting, fraud detection or identity screening, they need dependable guidance on transparency, fairness and data use.
Open banking and partnerships. Banks, aggregators and fintech platforms need consistent interpretations of consent, accountability and data sharing. Modernized guidance helps reduce friction in new partnerships and supports investment decisions.
Competitiveness and trust. Canada has pursued privacy reform for several years. While reforms remain unfinished, guidance modernization is one of the main tools available to increase clarity and reduce uncertainty. Clear rules improve investor confidence and support firms that want to expand or build new financial services.
Outlook
This guidance modernization consultation gives fintechs and financial firms an opportunity to help improve how privacy guidance develops in Canada. The OPC wants a process that delivers timely updates, clearer expectations and stronger transparency.
See: Stronger Bank–NBFI Links Show Why Data Matters Most
By submitting practical examples and highlighting where current guidance creates uncertainty, fintech firms can support a framework that strengthens trust and reduces friction across the market. Clearer guidance also supports growth, investment and innovation at a time when Canada needs stronger competitiveness in financial services and technology.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
