Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Quantum Financing | Jan 9, 2026

Image: Unsplash/Planet Volumes
On January 6, 2026, Photonic $180M CAD financing led by UK based Planet First Partners brought large scale foreign capital into Canada’s quantum sector, with new Canadian institutional participation from RBC and Telus. At the same time, Ottawa launched Phase 1 of the Canadian Quantum Champions Program, committing up to $92M CAD across four companies, including Photonic, Xanadu, Nord Quantique, and Anyon Systems, as part of a $334.3M five year federal quantum investment announced in Budget 2025.
The timing suggests that Canada’s multi year quantum funding commitment may have helped lower perceived risk for both foreign investors and Canadian institutions, even though no direct causal link has been publicly stated. Public funding keeps core quantum builders anchored domestically, while private capital begins to treat leading teams as institutional grade businesses rather than long term research projects. As outlined in British Columbia Investment Management write-up who also participated in Photonic's round, when public and private capital move together at this scale, founders and global buyers take Canada more seriously.
Having said that, in 2026 what actually matters is not running quantum workloads, but preparing for the security, regulatory, and capital consequences that this level of quantum funding now creates.
The strongest counterpoint does not come from skeptics. It comes from how enterprise leaders rank priorities. For example, the Gartner Top Technology Trends 2026 does not include quantum computing among its top ten themes. CIO agendas continue to focus on AI platforms, security posture, provenance, and geopolitical resilience. That does not dismiss quantum, but it does highlight a timing gap between capital commitment and operational adoption.
Government timelines reinforce that gap for quantum computing itself. The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency frames its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative around proving whether any approach can reach utility scale quantum systems by 2033, defined as performance where value exceeds cost. For most buyers, that horizon places 2026 clearly in preparation mode rather than procurement for quantum compute workloads.
Security planning, however, tells a different story. The Forrester 2026 technology and security outlook projects that quantum security spending will exceed 5% of total IT security budgets in 2026. That spending focuses on migration planning, cryptographic discovery, and inventory tools to prioritize high impact systems. This does not signal near term adoption of quantum computers. It shows that quantum already matters operationally through security readiness, compliance pressure, and budget allocation.
The above explains why quantum feels both early and urgent at the same time. Compute remains longer dated, but security and cryptography move first. In August 2024, NIST finalized post quantum cryptography standards with explicit guidance for organizations to begin transitioning, and Canada aligns with that direction through federal quantum safe cryptography guidance.
Concurrently, Canada’s quantum builders continue to clear independent validation gates. As of November 6, 2025, DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Stage B advances 11 companies globally. Canadian firms Photonic, Xanadu, and Nord Quantique have progressed to this stage, which may matter more than domestic promotion.
In 2026, the real risk is committing too early to cryptography, vendors, or long-term contracts that cannot adapt as post-quantum requirements take shape. The combination of the Photonic financing and the $334.3M federal commitment makes this risk harder to ignore, not because quantum computers arrive tomorrow, but because capital and policy are both pointing toward future regulatory expectations. Regulators and auditors do not need quantum machines to ask whether systems can migrate without breaking core functions.
In practical terms, quantum readiness in 2026 means crypto agility, understanding where cryptography sits across the stack, and pressure testing suppliers against post quantum encryption standards. This work costs far less than a rushed migration later and fits inside security and compliance budgets that already exist.
The combination of a $180M CAD foreign led financing, $92M CAD in Phase 1 federal funding, and a $334.3M five year national quantum commitment puts Canada into a new category in 2026. Quantum still won't drive enterprise workloads in the near future, but for fintechs, banks, and infrastructure providers, the practical focus this year is crypto agility, supplier flexibility, and readiness for post quantum standards, not experimentation for its own sake.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Dec 17, 2025 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Scale and Partnerships
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
On December 11 2025, CapIntel announced a formal collaboration with KPMG Canada to support wealth management firms rolling out digital advisor and client tools, according to the company’s announcement. CapIntel says more than 20,000 wealth professionals across North America currently use its platform.
Buying technology rarely causes problems. Adoption does. Most of the friction shows up after procurement, when integration work begins and compliance teams step in. Tools that function well on their own often slow down once they enter legacy environments with uneven advisor workflows and strict oversight requirements.
Talking Point
CapIntel is pairing its advisor platform with delivery support to reduce adoption risk inside large wealth firms, while KPMG Canada continues to lean further into execution and integration work for digital wealth initiatives. Will this collaboration shorten rollout timelines enough to influence how enterprise wealth firms evaluate advisor technology vendors?
That pressure has been building inside large wealth management firms. Digital modernization still sits high on the agenda, but tolerance for long pilots and stalled rollouts has dropped. Senior teams want tools in daily use, not just sitting between approval and deployment. In enterprise and hybrid advisor models, inconsistent adoption creates operational and regulatory risk firms don’t want to carry.
Both organizations have been active elsewhere in fintech and wealth technology over the past year. CapIntel has continued to expand partnerships and publish advisor focused research tied to client communication and trust, while KPMG Canada has emphasized its role in digital modernization and implementation support for wealth firms navigating complex operating environments.
This collaboration brings delivery into the commercial discussion instead of leaving it for later. CapIntel is pairing its platform with implementation and change management support rather than assuming firms will solve execution internally. That matters when advisor tools touch regulated client communications and firm wide processes.
James Rockwood, Chief Executive Officer, CapIntel:
“Joining forces with KPMG strengthens our ability to deliver at scale for the enterprise wealth market. By combining KPMG’s integration and transformation capabilities with our platform’s powerful advisor tools, we’re helping clients realize the full value of their digital strategy faster.”
As wealth technology matures, differentiation increasingly shows up in execution rather than interface design. Feature sets tend to converge. Integration effort, advisor training, and governance alignment don’t. For large firms, disruption risk often outweighs incremental product improvements.
The real test is practical. Firms will be watching for named deployments, clear rollout timelines, and repeatable implementation results across advisor teams. If those surface, the collaboration will carry weight inside buying committees. If they don’t, it’s likely to stay a partnership on paper.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Regulation | December 17, 2025

Image: Freepik AI
On December 17 2025, the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization CIRO launched a review to improve access to affordable tailored online investment advice, including automated and hybrid models. The announcement includes a link to the consultation Access to Online Advice in the Advisory and Managed Channels, which remains open for feedback until January 31, 2026.
The review follows closely after the Canadian Securities Administrators CSA and CIRO jointly issued new guidance establishing clear rules for finfluencers on December 11 2025. Taken together these actions address two connected parts of the same challenge as investing activity continues to move online. The joint CSA CIRO guidance clarifies that opinions about specific securities or investment recommendations can trigger registration and compliance obligations regardless of format or platform. Disclaimers alone do not remove these obligations. Firms and issuers that work with finfluencers are still responsible for marketing conduct, disclosures, and investor protection requirements.
This clarification responds to the reality that many retail investors rely on social media and digital platforms as primary sources of investing information. Regulators also stress that followers may reasonably rely on this content even when creators may not view themselves as providing advice. The guidance reduces ambiguity around unregistered influence and reinforces that investor protection expectations apply equally in digital and traditional environments.
By tightening the boundary between information and advice, the finfluencer guidance strengthens the regulatory perimeter around investment advice.
That perimeter matters because when informal online advice becomes more constrained, pressure increases on the regulated system to deliver practical alternatives for investors who still need guidance.
CIRO’s consultation addresses that pressure directly. It acknowledges that the current policy framework was built for traditional in person advisory services and that there is no dedicated regulatory framework for online or hybrid advisory models. Dealers instead rely on exemptive relief and special terms and conditions. CIRO notes this structure is a source of higher costs, regulatory uncertainty, and limited scalability for technology enabled advice.
Enabling greater access to advice is in CIRO's Strategic Plan FY 2025–2027. The online advice consultation makes clear that this work builds on earlier reforms focused on the Order Execution Only channel and do it yourself investors. CIRO recognizes that OEO dealers play a critical role by providing low cost market access and educational resources, but also acknowledges that a fully self directed approach does not work for every investor.
NCFA previously explored this progression in CIRO proposal could expand DIY investor education tools, which looks at how regulators have been strengthening information and decision support for self-directed investors. The current review complements those reforms, aimed at helping investors who need more than education tools but cannot access traditional full service advice.
Alexandra Williams, SVP, Strategy, Innovation, and Stakeholder Protection:
“Our policy framework was designed for traditional advisory services, and we hope the review will identify any regulatory barriers in CIRO’s current policy. This review will help identify whether any aspects of our current framework may be creating barriers, particularly for Canadians seeking affordable tailored online advice.”
The consultation asks whether regulatory requirements can be met using technology and whether the current framework creates unintended consequences for investors seeking affordable tailored advice.
For fintechs and digital wealth platforms, business models that rely on influence without registration now face greater regulatory risk. Firms that operate inside the regulatory perimeter may benefit if CIRO develops clearer and more workable expectations for online and hybrid advice delivery.
Manual processes and high cost service models can and do limit reach. Technology powered suitability assessments, disclosures, supervision, and record keeping could lower costs and expand access if regulators allow greater flexibility in how compliant outcomes are achieved.
The consultation is open until the end of January 2026, and CIRO is inviting stakeholders to submit written feedback on online advice.
Canadian investors increasingly make financial decisions in digital environments, however policymakers are realizing two competing forces. Unregulated online influence can expose investors to harm, and yet regulated frameworks must adapt so affordable tailored advice can reach more people (typically powered by tech). This consultation gives industry participants a great opportunity to help inform evidence based perspectives and solutions. The feedback received will influence whether Canada can narrow the advice gap while maintaining trust in capital markets.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |