Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: Regtech, Compliance, Governance
SEC Scrutinizes Terraform’s $166M Transfer to Dentons
Crypto | Feb 29, 2024
Image: Freepik/studiogstock
SEC scrutinizes Terraform Labs for a $166 million fund amid bankruptcy proceedings
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is taking action against Terraform Labs by scrutinizing a $166 million transfer to the law firm Dentons. Amidst Terraform Labs' bankruptcy saga, the move raises questions about the intentions behind substantial financial transfers made since the start of 2023. The SEC's allegations suggest these funds may have been aimed at evading potential future judgments related to the SEC's lawsuit against the company. This development adds a new layer to the complex narrative surrounding Terraform Labs, particularly in light of the company's involvement in the dramatic collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin, which erased billions in investor assets.
- The SEC has highlighted suspicious financial activities involving Terraform Labs, including a significant $166 million transfer to Dentons. This action is part of a broader investigation into the company's financial management and legal strategies following its bankruptcy filing.
- Terraform Labs' decision to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy was reportedly influenced by the looming financial penalties from federal regulators. The company's financial maneuvers, including the contested transfers, were ostensibly aimed at covering legal expenses, including those of its co-founder, Do Kwon, who faces criminal charges in multiple jurisdictions.
See: SEC Intensifies Accounting Audits in 2023
- While the SEC does not oppose Terraform Labs' payment of legitimate legal expenses, the regulator has raised concerns over the magnitude of the funds transferred to Dentons. The SEC's objections reflect apprehensions about the potential misuse of company assets, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the use of such funds.
Follow the Money
- Following its bankruptcy declaration, Terraform petitioned the court overseeing its bankruptcy for authorization to engage Dentons as its special litigation counsel and to allocate $6.3 million towards the legal expenses of its staff and essential external collaborators embroiled in litigation. Terraform's legal documents reveal that approximately $3.25 million from this sum is designated for covering the legal costs of its employees.
- Terraform is also pursuing approval to expend roughly $1.33 million on a lawsuit in the UK, which it believes will unearth crucial evidence from a cryptocurrency trading firm beneficial to its defense against the SEC's legal actions.
See: Federal Judge Rules Against Terraform labs
- According to the SEC, the bulk of the retainer fees, amounting to $122 million, were moved to Dentons within the 90 days leading up to Terraform's bankruptcy filing. Consequently, this sum might be subject to reclamation to settle debts with Terraform's other creditors, presenting a possible conflict of interest between Terraform and Dentons, as pointed out by the regulatory body.
- Bottom line: The SEC contends that Dentons should be precluded from representing Terraform, its staff, or its contractors unless it reimburses $81 million still held in the retainer fund and agrees to have its subsequent charges reviewed and approved by the bankruptcy court.
SEC Said:
The money has been "siphoned" into an "opaque slush fund for its lawyers," to the detriment of the investors and creditors who will seek to be repaid in Terraform's bankruptcy.
See: Winklevoss’ Gemini to Refund $1.1 Billion After NYDFS Findings
Why It Matters
For stakeholders in the fintech and investment sectors, this case underscores the importance of regulatory compliance, financial transparency, and the potential repercussions of legal entanglements on corporate stability and investor trust.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
SEC Intensifies Accounting Audits in 2023
Report | Feb 29, 2024
Sharp increase in SEC enforcement on accounting practices in FY 2023
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) significantly stepped up its enforcement actions concerning accounting and auditing in the fiscal year 2023, as detailed in a recent report by Cornerstone Research as pointed out by at The D&O Dairy This marked increase, particularly pronounced in the fiscal year's final quarter, highlights the SEC's reinforced efforts to ensure financial transparency and uphold regulatory standards. With a 22% rise in accounting and auditing enforcement actions.
- The SEC initiated 83 accounting and auditing enforcement actions in FY 2023, a 22% increase from 68 actions in FY 2022. This represents the highest annual number of such actions since FY 2019, emphasizing a renewed regulatory emphasis on accounting standards and auditing integrity.
- Of the 83 actions, 71 (86%) were administrative proceedings, an increase from 75% in FY 2022. This indicates a preference for internal regulatory processes over civil court actions, with the SEC bringing 12 civil actions in FY 2023, down from 17 in the previous year.
- Among the individual respondents, 24% were CEOs, and 22% were CFOs. This highlights the SEC's focus on holding top corporate executives accountable for financial oversight. Approximately one-third of individual respondents were Certified Public Accountants, being scrutinized on professional ethics and responsibilities in financial reporting.
See: SEC’s Escalating Crypto Enforcement
- The SEC initiated 11 actions against non-U.S. respondents, up from 5 in FY 2022. Actions involved respondents from Canada, the Netherlands, Ireland, the UK, Singapore, and more, indicating the global reach of SEC's enforcement efforts.
- Despite the increase in enforcement actions, aggregate monetary settlements in these cases decreased by 7% to $583 million in FY 2023. Civil penalties constituted 33% of the total settlements, with the remainder attributed to disgorgement and prejudgment interest, highlighting the financial repercussions of non-compliance.
Why It Matters
The SEC's ramped-up enforcement actions in accounting and auditing during FY 2023 signal a clear directive towards enhanced financial accuracy and ethical auditing practices. For fintech executives, investors, and stakeholders, understanding and adapting to these regulatory dynamics is crucial for ensuring sustainable business practices and fostering a transparent financial environment.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Winklevoss’ Gemini to Refund $1.1 Billion After NYDFS Findings
Enforcement News | Feb 29, 2024
Image from Gemini blog
Gemini agrees to a $1.1 billion refund plan after NYDFS findings
The New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has announced an agreement with Gemini Trust Company, LLC, mandating the return of at least $1.1 billion to customers of its Earn program. This decision follows the discovery of compliance failures and the mishandling of a partnership with Genesis Global Capital, LLC (GGC), which led to substantial customer losses. The settlement includes a $37 million fine and outlines Gemini's commitment to rectify the situation through the bankruptcy proceedings of GGC.
- Gemini's pledge to reimburse $1.1 billion to Earn customers represents a substantial effort to address the fallout from the Earn program's suspension and Genesis Global Capital's subsequent bankruptcy.
See: New York Takes Legal Action Against Major Crypto Firms
- This settlement highlights a shift towards stronger protections for cryptocurrency investors, particularly in response to the risks associated with lending programs and third-party partnerships. The NYDFS has imposed a $37 million penalty on Gemini for various compliance failures, emphasizing the importance of regulatory adherence in the cryptocurrency sector.
- Gemini's operational practices, including insufficient due diligence and inadequate reserve maintenance, have led to significant reputational and financial damage, affecting over 200,000 customers.
Gemini's Response to the Resolution
In a blog post from Team Gemini said, "This settlement, pending Bankruptcy Court approval, promises the return of 100% of digital assets to Earn users, including any appreciation since the assets were lent. Gemini expects to return over $1.8 billion in today's value, with users receiving approximately 97% of their assets in kind within about two months and the remainder within the next 12 months.
See: Binance Withdraws from Canadian Market due to Tightened Crypto Regulations
Gemini also acknowledges the New York Department of Financial Services' role in reaching this settlement and commits an additional $40 million to aid users' recovery, emphasizing their dedication to customer asset security and appreciation for users' patience throughout the process."
Outlook
The NYDFS's action against Gemini Trust Company, LLC, culminating in a $1.1 billion customer reimbursement plan is another cautious warning to other platforms regarding the importance of compliance, due diligence, and the protection of consumer assets. This development is expected to influence future regulatory frameworks and operational standards within the digital asset market, aiming to foster a safer and more reliable trading environment for investors.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
FCA’s Shift to More Transparent Investigations
Policy | Feb 28, 2024
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
FCA Consultation on Strategic Shift in Enforcement Case Transparency
The FCA plans to be more open about its enforcement investigations. This includes publishing updates on ongoing investigations and disclosing when cases are closed without enforcement action. The decision to announce an investigation will be made on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as the potential impact on the UK financial system's integrity, public reassurance, and the assistance in any investigations. Previously, such announcements were made under very limited circumstances. Read the consultation paper.
Increased transparency is expected to enhance public confidence and demonstrate the FCA's proactive enforcement stance. It also aims to deter potential misconduct by making firms aware of the serious failings that could lead to an investigation, encouraging quicker behavioral adjustments. This new approach is anticipated to drive greater accountability for the FCA as an enforcement agency and enable the use of intervention powers to prevent harm in real-time.
See: FCA Highlights Common Issues in Crypto Marketing
Therese Chambers, Joint ED Enforcement at the FCA (related announcement):
"By being more transparent when we open and close cases we can enhance public confidence by showing that we are on the case. At the same time, we will amplify the deterrent impact of our work by enabling firms to understand the types of serious failings that can lead to an investigation, helping them to change their own behaviour more quickly. Greater transparency will also drive greater accountability for us as an enforcement agency."
Reaction and Concerns
The proposed changes have led to a mix of anticipation and concern within the financial services sector:
- Some industry participants worry that publicly naming firms under investigation could cause market harm and reputational damage, especially if firms are later found not to have committed any wrongdoing.
- While the FCA aims to deter misconduct by increasing transparency, there's a debate on whether the potential reputational damage to firms is a justified or effective deterrent.
See: FCA Uses New Tools to Catch 14X more Mis-leading Ads than Last Year
- The FCA's approach attempts to balance the need for public transparency with the rights and reputations of the firms under investigation, reflecting the complexity of regulatory enforcement.
Alexandra Roberts, Head of Regulatory Policy and Compliance at PIMFA:
“It is not immediately clear to us how public announcements of potential enforcement action will support the FCA’s approach to supervision and enforcement – it seems unlikely to us that being ‘named and shamed’ publicly would be the primary deterrent for a firm committed to introducing harm into the market. More broadly, very real consideration needs to be given to what the potential impact will be on firms that are publicly subject to enforcement action. These announcements will lead to significant outflows for small firms in particular, rendering their businesses hollow shells of what they were previously, whilst larger listed firms will almost certainly be subject to significant shareholder volatility."
Consultation (Deadline April 16, 2024)
The FCA has opened a consultation to gather feedback on these proposed changes, indicating its openness to industry and public input. Stakeholders are encouraged to provide their feedback by April 16, allowing the FCA to consider various perspectives before finalizing the changes.
See: UK Releases Digital Asset Consultation Results
The FCA's proposed changes to enforcement transparency represent an effort to enhance the effectiveness and public confidence in its regulatory actions. By inviting feedback and discussing potential concerns, the FCA aims to refine its approach to enforcement, ensuring it supports the integrity of the financial system while considering the impacts on the firms involved.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
SEC vs. Canada: Cybersecurity Rules Overview
Cybersecurity | Feb 28, 2024
Image: Freepik/DC Studio
Comparing U.S. SEC and Canadian Cybersecurity Regulations for Businesses
The introduction of new SEC cybersecurity rules in 2023 has further highlightetd the importance of board involvement in cybersecurity oversight. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP wrote an informative article on emerging expectations for public companies in the U.S. Below we compare at a high level the new SEC rules with the Canadian regulatory landscape including implications for startups and scaleups.
United States
- The SEC mandates that public companies report material cybersecurity incidents within four business days of determining their materiality. Prompt disclosure fullstop.
See: OSFI’s New Security and Integrity Guideline 2024
- Companies are required to disclose their processes for identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks in their annual reports, including the board's oversight role.
- There's a strong emphasis on the board's active engagement in cybersecurity oversight, with specific requirements for documenting the board's oversight of cybersecurity risks.
Canada
- The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) issued guidelines in December 2023 rather than strict rules for cybersecurity disclosures. These guidelines encourage companies to disclose material cybersecurity risks and incidents but do not specify a strict timeline for disclosure like the SEC's four-business-day requirement.
- Canadian regulations tend to emphasize a risk-based approach, urging companies to consider the likelihood and magnitude of harm from cybersecurity incidents when determining materiality for disclosure purposes.
- Canada has robust privacy laws, such as the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), which require businesses to protect personal information and report breaches of security safeguards that pose a real risk of significant harm to individuals. This complements cybersecurity disclosure by focusing on the protection of personal data.
See: Blakes: Cybersecurity Trends in Canada: A 2023 Perspective
- Canada has implemented a national cybersecurity strategy that includes initiatives to improve the cybersecurity posture of businesses, including small and medium-sized enterprises. This strategy supports a broader approach to cybersecurity resilience across the economy.
Key Differences and Similarities
- One of the main differences is the mandatory nature of the SEC's disclosure requirements versus the more voluntary, guideline-based approach taken by Canadian regulators.
- The SEC provides a specific timeline for reporting material cybersecurity incidents, which is not explicitly matched by Canadian guidelines.
- Both countries emphasize the importance of protecting personal information, but Canada's approach is underpinned by specific privacy legislation that requires breach notification based on the risk of harm.
Implications for Startups and Scale-Ups
For startups and scale-ups in Canada, understanding both the Canadian and U.S. regulatory environments is critical, especially for those operating or planning to operate in cross-border contexts. While Canada's approach may offer more flexibility, the trend in both countries reflects a growing emphasis on transparency, accountability, and proactive risk management in cybersecurity.
See: Cavelo Inc. Raises CAD$5M to Advance Cybersecurity Solutions
Canadian companies, especially those considering going public or expanding into the U.S. market, should be mindful of these regulatory differences and prepare accordingly. Adopting best practices from both regulatory frameworks can enhance a company's cybersecurity posture and its attractiveness to investors and partners in an increasingly digital and interconnected business environment.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Canada’s Shift to Enhanced Climate Disclosures
Climate Disclosure | Feb 20, 2024
Image by macrovector on Freepik
Embracing New Climate Disclosure Standards in Canada
With the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) proposing the National Instrument 51-107 Disclosure of Climate-related Matters (NI 51-107) and its Companion Policy 51-107CP, alongside the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) introducing the B-15 Climate Risk Management guidelines, the governance implications for directors, boards, and public company governance are profound.
See: Fintech Can Combat Corporate Greenwashing
This article sheds light on these regulatory shifts, offering insights and implications for Canadian fintechs and public companies, in alignment with the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) global standards.
CSA's Climate Disclosure Proposals
The CSA's Climate Disclosure Proposals aim to enhance transparency and accountability in how Canadian public companies assess and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities. This initiative reflects a growing recognition of the importance of climate-related information for investors, both in Canada and globally. The proposals are designed to align with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD: disbanded October 2023 with mandate picked up by IFRS) recommendations, covering governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets for climate-related issues.
OSFI's B-15 Climate Risk Management Guidelines
Simultaneously, OSFI has introduced the B-15 guidelines, marking a critical regulatory development for financial institutions in Canada. These guidelines mandate banks, insurance companies, and other financial entities to robustly assess, disclose, and manage the physical and transitional risks associated with climate change. The B-15 guidelines emphasize the need for financial institutions to integrate climate risk into their overall risk management frameworks and enhance transparency in their climate-related disclosures. These guidelines are now in effect. Yet, despite push back OSFI is still playing catch-up when evaluating international comparators such as climate change disclosure initiatives in the UK, climate risks and regulatory capital frameworks, and on integrity.
ISSB's Global Standards
The ISSB has introduced proposed standards for climate-related disclosure and sustainability-related financial information, setting a new benchmark for global sustainability disclosures. These standards aim to serve as "the global baseline" upon their finalization, emphasizing the need for disclosures that provide consistent and comparable information for investors.
In 2024, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has implemented the IFRS S1 and S2 standards as voluntary standards for organizations, focusing on disclosures about governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets for material sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities. These standards, which incorporate the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), aim to simplify the landscape of disclosure initiatives for companies and investors, ensuring consistent and comparable information.
See: Decarbonizing Insurance and the Adaptation of Carriers to a New Zero Economy
The ISSB has also updated the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards and released resources to aid in applying IFRS S2, emphasizing the nature and social aspects of climate-related risks and opportunities. Learn more about what to expect from the ISSB in 2024 here.
Implications for Governance
For directors and boards of Canadian public companies and financial institutions, these developments underscore the necessity of robust governance frameworks that explicitly address climate-related risks and opportunities. This includes establishing clear oversight mechanisms, delineating management's responsibilities, and ensuring that board committees, particularly the audit committee, are equipped to assess and manage climate risks effectively.
- Boards must integrate climate-related risk oversight into their governance structures, updating charters and mandates to reflect this priority.
- Clearly defined responsibilities for assessing and managing climate-related risks are essential, necessitating robust disclosure controls and procedures.
- Boards are tasked with evaluating the materiality of climate-related risks and opportunities, potentially employing scenario analysis to assess the resilience of business strategies.
Opportunities for Fintechs
As Canada aligns its climate disclosure regulations with global standards, the collaborative efforts of regulatory bodies, public companies, and the fintech sector will be key to fostering a sustainable and transparent corporate ecosystem.
See: Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Future
The regulatory shift towards comprehensive climate disclosure presents a unique opportunity for the Canadian fintech sector. Fintechs have an opportunity to lead innovation in climate risk assessment and disclosure solutions, offering tools and platforms that enable companies to meet these new standards efficiently. By developing solutions and integrating new technologies that facilitate data analysis, reporting, and scenario modeling, fintechs can enhance transparency and sustainability in the financial sector.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Navigating Regulatory Compliance in Canadian Fintech: A Startup’s Guide
Feb 16, 2024
Innovation fuels progress in the financial technology world, and Canada has emerged as a promising hub for fintech startups. As entrepreneurs set their sites on creating cutting-edge solutions, a complex regulatory environment demanding careful navigation meets them head-on. This guide aims to shed some light on some of the regulatory challenges fintech startups face in Canada.
Launching a fintech startup is a journey fraught with challenges and opportunities. Understanding the regulatory landscape is a crucial part of that journey. Whether you have hopes and dreams of becoming a payment processor for the best site for sports betting, have a new-fangled idea linked to the ever-evolving cryptocurrency world, or are still at the planning stage of your fintech journey, you must be aware of the challenges you will face and know how to overcome them.
Understanding the Regulatory Landscape
The regulatory framework in Canada is multifaceted and serves the dual purpose of protecting consumers while maintaining the integrity and stability of the financial sector. The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) is at the forefront of regulatory oversight in Canada.
Originally established to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, FINTRAC imposes strict reporting requirements on financial entities. A meticulous approach to such financial reports is essential to ensure startups comply with the letter of the law and contribute to the broader goal of maintaining the economic system’s integrity. Fines for non-compliance can be severe. For example, FINTRAC issued a $7.4 million fine to the Royal Bank of Canada for failing to comply with anti-money laundering and terrorist funding measures.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is another critical regulatory player. OSFI focuses on prudential oversight to ensure the soundness and resilience of financial institutions. Some fintech companies, even those that are not traditional banks, may fall under the purview of OSFI.
The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) adds another layer of complexity to the regulatory landscape, mainly if you are a fintech company specializing in investment products or securities.
Entrepreneurs must adopt a proactive stance in this dynamic regulatory environment. Without staying abreast of regulatory changes and cultivating relationships with the various regulatory bodies, the chances a fintech startup succeeds are slim to none.
Compliance Requirements and Hurdles
Image: Unsplash/Kanchanara
Fintech startups encounter many compliance requirements and hurdles that underscore the delicate balance between innovation and adherence to legal frameworks. Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations provide a significant challenge. Latest estimates put the amount of money laundered through businesses at between 2-5% of the global GDP annually, so it is easy to see why regulators are keen to ensure all companies adhere to AML rules and regulations.
Having an AML compliance program in place is essential. Systems must be employed to detect suspicious activity, ensure no transactions are processed from sanctioned individuals, businesses, and countries, and much more. Fines for failing to adhere to strict AML guidelines are severe.
Robust Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures are also required. KYC helps a Fintech company identify its clients, helping reduce the risk of financial crimes such as fraud and money laundering. The complexity lies in meeting these requirements so that the KYC checks are thorough without stifling the overall user experience.
Data protection laws, like the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) provide another substantial hurdle that must be navigated. Regulators take data protection and privacy seriously, and breaches or failure to comply with PIPEDA are serious offenses. Fintech companies dealing in commercial activities must have a data compliance officer employed because a myriad of rules exist.
Strict rules regarding how data is gathered, stored, and processed must be stuck to like glue. Individuals have more control than ever before on how their data is used. For example, individuals have the right to erase the data you hold about them, must be informed of the data you are harvesting and how you plan to use it, and can even request to see all data you hold about them, along with explanations on what the data means.
Further complications arise if a fintech is involved in digital currencies and blockchain technologies. Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) are still evolving.
All these different regulations make the role of legal expertise becomes crucial. Unless you are well-versed in every nuance of fintech regulation, you must engage with professionals in each sector. These legal experts play a pivotal role in ensuring you remain compliant but can also help strategize how to innovate without stepping out of the law’s boundaries.
Tips For Navigating Regulatory Challenges
Staying informed about regulatory changes and updates is fintech startups' first line of defense. Follow publications from regulatory bodies and seek legal advice to ensure you understand how those changes affect your business.
Establishing open lines of communication with regulatory authorities is an excellent idea. Although these entities are there to enforce the rules they set, you will find they are accommodating if you build a relationship with them.
Ensure that you have legal professionals on hand who fully understand fintech complexities and the industry regulations. These legal eagles tend not to come cheap, but they are worth their weight in gold.
Investing in compliance technology and building a compliance culture within your business are two essential steps. Compliance technology can streamline KYC and data protection processes while adhering to regulatory requirements. Training your staff about the nuances of compliance and instilling a culture of compliance helps prevent issues before they arise.
Conclusion
Regulatory compliance in Canadian fintech provides significant initial and ongoing challenges, but navigating them is essential for long-term success. From anti-money laundering (AML) to Know Your Customer (KYC) and data protection (PIPEDA), it is a minefield out there.
See: BoC Update for PSPs: New Registration Guide and Supervisory Policies Available
However, by remaining proactive, fostering a mindset within your company that has compliance front and center of everything you do, and opening communication channels with regulatory bodies and legal professionals, you can ensure your company stays on the right side of the law, builds trust with customers and stakeholders, and avoid business-threatening fines and sanctions.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
