The central idea is personal empowerment. Zuckerberg argues that advanced AI should give individuals more ability to create, learn, build businesses, improve their health and pursue their own goals rather than placing most of that intelligence under the control of governments, large institutions or a handful of AI companies.
Meta's vision imagines personal agents working continuously on a user's behalf, small teams building companies that once required much larger organizations, personalized tutors, faster scientific discovery and powerful creative tools available to billions of people.
Meta wants AI capability spread widely, while the compute, models, release decisions and government relationships needed to provide it remain concentrated among a handful of organizations.
Mark Zuckerberg, Founder and CEO, Meta:
“The defining questions of our age are who will have access to superintelligence and what will we direct it towards.”
Meta Is Betting On Invention More Than Automation
One of Zuckerberg's strongest economic arguments is that AI's biggest contribution could come from helping people invent things rather than simply automating today's jobs.
Meta expects individuals to become capable of doing work that currently requires larger teams, more capital or specialized expertise. Zuckerberg predicts more small businesses, more experimentation and potentially more employment as people use AI to create products, services and jobs that don't exist today.
That is a different vision from a future where AI mainly replaces knowledge work. Meta argues that if personal agents increase people's capabilities quickly enough, workers can adapt and new demand can grow alongside automation.
For founders, that could change the economics of starting a company. Product development, research, design, marketing and operations could require fewer people and less initial capital. Small firms could reach meaningful scale much earlier.
Financial services will feel the same pressure. Meta already has AI that can plan work, connect with email and calendars and continue tasks after the user leaves. As agents gain access to financial information and connected services, permissions and accountability become part of the operating model, especially when an agent can act rather than simply advise.
Meta Thinks Distributing AI Can Also Make It Safer
The more unusual part of Zuckerberg's argument is about safety.
He rejects the idea that one centrally controlled superintelligence can be aligned to a single set of values that works for everyone. People disagree about politics, economics, culture and what makes a good life.
Meta's answer is to distribute powerful AI widely enough that people, businesses, governments and competing AI systems check one another.
It is essentially a balance of power argument. One person with vastly better legal, financial or cybersecurity intelligence could gain an enormous advantage. If many people have access to comparable capabilities, Meta argues that power becomes harder to monopolize. (There’s some irony here. Zuckerberg built his fortune by controlling access to data, distribution and network effects that others couldn’t easily replicate.)
That philosophy also influences Meta's approach to alignment. Personal agents should primarily help users pursue their own goals within legal and safety boundaries rather than enforce one company's view of what those goals should be.
Meta says it plans to build a private mode where even Meta can't access a user's information, and it intends to resume releasing some open models. It is also giving its independent board authority to approve safety criteria for model releases rather than leaving those decisions entirely with Zuckerberg or management.
Meta's existing algorithmic products are already under legal scrutiny, including a federal trial involving 29 U.S. states over alleged harm to children. Meta denies the allegations. A company asking people to trust far more capable personal agents will have to show that user empowerment, privacy and safety work in practice. Algorithmic accountability is already moving into the courts as AI and automated systems take on a larger role in people's lives.
The Vision Extends Into Government And Geopolitics
Zuckerberg's decentralization argument has limits.
He wants individuals to have broad access to powerful AI, but he also argues that the United States and its allies should retain leadership in advanced models, silicon and infrastructure. Meta supports continued restrictions on exports of leading chips to geopolitical rivals and wants U.S. policy to make it easier to build data centres and energy capacity.
He also proposes closer cooperation between frontier AI labs and government. Rather than waiting until an advanced model is finished, Meta wants labs to share intermediate model checkpoints and technical staff so governments can identify cybersecurity and other security risks earlier.
The result still leaves considerable power with governments, frontier labs and the companies that control advanced compute. Individuals would gain far more capability. Governments would receive earlier access for security purposes. Independent boards would get more authority over release standards. Frontier labs would still control development of the most capable models.
Meta's vision is therefore decentralized at the user level while retaining substantial institutional coordination at the frontier.
Meta Has To Finance The Future It Is Promising
Meta expects capital spending of US$130 billion to US$145 billion in 2026 and spent US$31.08 billion in the second quarter alone. It is investing in models, data centres, energy, networking, its own chips and outside accelerators while trying to deliver AI across products already used by billions of people.
If personal superintelligence is going to be free or affordable at global scale, someone still has to pay for the compute..
Meta wants superintelligence broadly distributed, but scarce compute still has to be allocated. Its answer is a dynamic auction for additional capacity, which means the vision of AI for everyone could still produce tiers of access based partly on what users can afford. (conflict?)
The business model hasn't been proven. Meta's second quarter free cash flow fell to US$784 million as infrastructure spending accelerated, even while its core advertising business remained highly profitable.
Meta is making these commitments under real pressure. Its infrastructure spending has climbed rapidly, the company is still building the compute capacity and custom chips needed to compete at the frontier, and its existing platforms face growing legal scrutiny.
The scale of the investment also reinforces a central tension in Zuckerberg's vision. Meta wants personal AI to give individuals more power, but only a small number of companies can currently finance the systems needed to provide it.
Canada Should Pay Attention To Access And Agency
Meta's vision has clear upside for Canada.
Canadian entrepreneurs, researchers and smaller businesses could gain access to capabilities they would never be able to finance themselves. If AI lowers the cost of creating companies, learning new skills and developing new products, a smaller economy can participate without matching U.S. frontier model spending dollar for dollar.
Canada is already debating how to keep more domestic intellectual property, capital and compute capacity while using global AI platforms. The country's AI sovereignty debate is partly about preserving enough domestic capability to avoid becoming only a customer of technology developed and controlled elsewhere.
A recent pro-human AI initiative backed by researchers, business and labour groups also argues for human agency, limits on concentrated power and accountability for AI companies. Zuckerberg reaches some similar principles from a very different starting point.
Canada needs enough choice, competition, data control and domestic capability for its companies and citizens to use increasingly powerful AI on their own terms.
Talking Point
Zuckerberg's bet is that superintelligence can give individuals more power to learn, invent, work and build. Meta has the reach and financial capacity to put that idea in front of billions of people. The cost of doing so is already putting heavy pressure on cash flow.Whether users ultimately gain more control will depend on who controls the models, data, compute and rules behind their personal AI.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
August 13, 2026 | NCFA Resource | Risk Compliance And Regtech, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Regulation And Policy
Machine Readable Rules For Compliance Systems And AI
On August 6, 2026, the UK Financial Conduct Authority launched the FCA Handbook API, giving firms, developers and RegTech providers direct access to structured Handbook data. The free service lets software retrieve current rules, guidance, technical standards and glossary content for use inside compliance and regulatory change systems.
The practical value is real. Firms no longer have to rely only on website searches, monthly downloads or manually maintained rule libraries when they want FCA source material inside their own systems. The API creates a direct route from the Handbook into software that tracks obligations, maps rules to business activities or supports AI assisted compliance work.
What It Does In Practice
The API provides structured access to the FCA Handbook, Technical Standards and Glossary. Users need a free Handbook account, and the FCA says the data can be used in firms’ own applications or through third party technology providers.
The FCA identifies several practical uses:
mapping rules to products, activities and customer journeys
tracking and comparing current and future Handbook changes
feeding regulatory and policy updates into compliance systems
supporting RegTech products with current FCA source data
providing trusted regulatory content to AI tools
AI can help retrieve, classify and compare regulatory information, but the quality of the output still depends on the source material it receives. A direct FCA data feed reduces one common problem which is compliance tools working from copied, stale or inconsistently maintained rule text.
NCFA has already identified this problem in AI powered regulatory reporting. The opportunity isn't simply to add AI to compliance work. Systems need reliable regulatory inputs, clear controls and a way to trace outputs back to the underlying rule or guidance.
The API can also reduce manual work around regulatory updates. Firms can connect Handbook content to internal rule inventories, product governance, control libraries or change management processes rather than repeatedly checking individual pages for updates.
There are some practical access conditions. Users cannot work with the API directly through the Handbook website. They need a compatible external application such as Postman or RapidAPI, or another system built to use the interface. Protected endpoints are also subject to rate limits.
Who Gets Value
The clearest users are compliance teams, legal teams, RegTech providers, financial institutions and fintechs that need FCA rules inside operational systems.
Large firms with internal technology teams can connect the data to their own compliance architecture and tailor how Handbook content is matched to business lines, products or controls.
Smaller firms may get more value indirectly through RegTech providers that use the API to improve rule monitoring, change alerts, obligation management or policy tools.
Developers and AI teams also gain a cleaner source for regulated workflows. For example, a compliance assistant could retrieve relevant Handbook content, compare current and future text, or help staff identify which internal policies may need review after a rule update.
That doesn't make the API a compliance decision engine. A system can retrieve the rule accurately and still reach a poor conclusion about how it applies to a particular firm, product or client situation. Human review, legal interpretation and internal accountability remain necessary.
Strengths And Limits
The main strength is source quality. The API automatically draws from the latest Handbook rather than requiring firms or vendors to maintain their own copy of the rulebook. That can improve consistency and reduce the delay between a Handbook update and its appearance inside a compliance system.
It is also useful that the FCA has made the service available without a separate licence fee. Firms can choose whether to connect directly or use a technology provider, which lowers the barrier for developers and RegTech companies testing new compliance tools.
The API is not a complete regulatory archive. It does not provide historic Handbook versions. Requests for past dates return an error, although current and future versions are available through the API. Firms that need a full historical record will still need the Handbook website, archive tools or their own retained records.
The API also does not cover every piece of FCA information. The FCA Handbook contains rules, guidance and standards, while other FCA publications, supervisory communications, consultations, speeches and notices remain outside that core source. Compliance systems therefore still need broader regulatory monitoring.
Direct access to current regulatory text improves the input, but it does not guarantee accurate interpretation. Firms using AI for compliance should still test outputs, keep records, control permissions and make it clear when a person needs to review the result. The IOSCO AI Supervisory Toolkit provides useful additional guidance on governance, oversight, data quality and control expectations for AI in regulated financial environments.
The FCA Handbook API is most useful when treated as authoritative source infrastructure. It can make regulatory information easier for software to retrieve and keep current, while firms remain responsible for deciding what the rules mean for their own operations.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: [www.ncfacanada.org](http://www.ncfacanada.org)
August 12, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Competition And Market Structure
Toronto Chip Design Brings A More Specialized Inference Option
On August 6, 2026, AMD agreed to acquire Taalas, a Toronto AI chip company that designs specialized chips to run individual AI models more efficiently. The price wasn't disclosed and the transaction hasn't closed yet, as it's subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.
AMD plans to bring Taalas technology into its accelerator portfolio alongside Instinct GPUs. That's a useful clue to the strategy. GPUs remain valuable because they can handle many models and workloads. Taalas gives AMD another option for cases where a model is used often enough that more specialized hardware could lower the cost of running it.
Taalas Reduces The Work Between Memory And Compute
Running an AI model requires processors to work through huge numbers of stored parameters. On conventional accelerators, much of that data has to travel between memory and compute hardware. The transfers take time, consume power and make high bandwidth memory an expensive part of an AI system. Taalas brings more storage and computation onto the same silicon and tailors the hardware to the model being run. The design can reduce the external memory, advanced packaging and data movement required by conventional accelerator systems.
Ljubisa Bajic, Founder and CEO, Taalas:
“The production of optimal silicon for each individual model.”
Its first HC1 demonstrator runs Meta's Llama 3.1 8B model on a TSMC 6nm chip with 53 billion transistors. Taalas packages the system in a 2.5 kW server and currently provides access through a beta inference service and API.
The trade-off is straightforward. A GPU can be reprogrammed for many models. HC1 is largely built around one. It supports different context lengths and LoRA fine tuning, but a substantially different model requires another hardware implementation.
Taalas says it can turn a new model into silicon in about two months. If that process works economically at larger scale, AMD could use specialized chips for mature, heavily used models while keeping programmable accelerators for workloads that change more often.
17,000 Token Benchmark
Taalas says HC1 can generate about 17,000 output tokens per second per user on Llama 3.1 8B using a 1K input and 1K output sequence.
That's a company benchmark. Taalas ran its own HC1 result and measured the Nvidia B200 comparison itself, while several other comparison figures came from Artificial Analysis. It shows what the architecture can do on this model and configuration. It doesn't establish that Taalas hardware is faster than Nvidia or other accelerators across AI inference.
HC1 also uses a custom format combining 3-bit and 6-bit parameters. Taalas acknowledges some loss in model quality compared with GPU benchmarks and says its next generation will use standard 4-bit floating point formats.
The company also reports large advantages in power use and system cost in its comparison. Those claims haven't been independently demonstrated across a wide range of models or production environments. It makes the acquisition a calculated bet. AI companies are spending enormous amounts to train models, but every model that reaches widespread use can create an equally serious inference problem: how to serve millions of requests quickly enough and cheaply enough.
Taalas was founded in Toronto in 2023 by Ljubisa Bajic, Drago Ignjatovic and Lejla Bajic. The team brought processor experience from AMD, Nvidia and Tenstorrent, which Ljubisa Bajic previously founded.
The company raised US$50 million before emerging from stealth in 2024 and another US$169 million in February 2026, bringing reported funding to about US$219 million. Investors included Quiet Capital, Fidelity and semiconductor investor Pierre Lamond.
Taalas says 24 people developed HC1, which shows how concentrated the engineering effort behind the first chip was.
The deal adds another company to Canada's growing AI hardware record. Toronto and Waterloo based Astrus is working on automated chip design, while Tenstorrent has built a much larger processor business from Toronto.
It also follows another major Canadian semiconductor transaction. U.S.-based Qualcomm agreed in 2025 to acquire Toronto-founded Alphawave Semi for US$2.4 billion, putting another Canadian-founded chip company under foreign ownership.
AMD will control Taalas if this acquisition closes, but it has also said it plans to retain and grow Canadian talent. There is no disclosed commitment to a specific Toronto headcount or to keeping Taalas as a separate company.
That makes the Canadian issue less about whether foreign capital is inherently good or bad and more about how much ownership, intellectual property and future economic value Canada retains as its AI companies scale. Canada's own AI strategy debate has put sovereign capital and domestic IP retention directly on the table.
Talking Point
Taalas raised more than US$200 million, built working silicon and attracted a strategic buyer in about three years. Canada can clearly produce teams and technology that global semiconductor companies want. The difficult question is whether enough domestic capital, procurement and infrastructure exist for more of those companies to scale further before selling.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
August 11, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Wealth Investing And Trading, Digital Assets, Competition And Market Structure
A 3% Bitcoin Allocation Built Into Portfolio Growth
On August 10, 2026, the RBC iShares alliance launched IBQT, a Toronto Stock Exchange ETF combining global equities with a targeted 3% allocation to bitcoin.
BlackRock introduced its Canadian IBIT in January 2025 as a standalone bitcoin investment product. IBQT currently obtains its bitcoin exposure through IBIT, putting that exposure inside the portfolio construction process. Investors own units of IBQT rather than bitcoin itself.
Portfolio ETFs Create Another Source Of Bitcoin Demand
IBQT changes how the bitcoin allocation is made. An investor doesn't have to choose a separate crypto fund or decide independently how much bitcoin to hold. The allocation is built into the portfolio.
That creates a demand channel tied to assets entering the fund. If IBQT grew to C$100 million while maintaining a 3% bitcoin target, about C$3 million of the portfolio would represent bitcoin exposure. At C$1 billion, the same target would represent about C$30 million.
Rebalancing can create another source of allocation demand when bitcoin's portfolio weight falls below target. BlackRock has not disclosed enough detail to establish a fixed rebalancing schedule or tolerance range, so IBQT should not be treated as a predictable bitcoin buying program.
The structure is still relevant to bitcoin's long term demand base.
Capital can reach bitcoin exposure because an investor bought a diversified portfolio rather than because that investor separately decided to buy a crypto fund.
Fidelity Has Already Tested The Model In Canada
BlackRock isn't first with the idea. Fidelity's All-in-One Equity ETF, FEQT, targets approximately 97% equities and 3% cryptocurrencies and currently obtains its crypto exposure through the Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF.
Fidelity also incorporates smaller crypto allocations into other all-in-one portfolios as their equity exposure declines. Its work integrating bitcoin into conventional investment infrastructure has been developing for years, including efforts to bring bitcoin into portfolio platforms rather than leave crypto entirely outside traditional wealth management.
FEQT alone had about C$5.5 billion in net assets in late July, providing evidence that a portfolio containing a small crypto sleeve can reach substantial scale in Canada.
IBQT adds BlackRock and the RBC iShares distribution platform to that competition. RBC Global Asset Management and BlackRock Canada retain separate fund management responsibilities within the alliance, which now spans more than 240 ETFs and over C$240 billion in assets.
There is also a pricing angle. IBQT launches with a 0.22% management fee inclusive of underlying iShares ETF fees. FEQT reported a 0.43% MER as of March 2026.
Bitcoin Market Check
IBQT is arriving during a much weaker bitcoin market than the environment surrounding the first wave of North American spot bitcoin ETFs.
Bitcoin was trading around US$65,000 on August 10 after a substantial decline earlier in 2026. BlackRock Canada's IBIT had grown to roughly C$390 million in net assets, giving IBQT an established Canadian bitcoin fund through which to obtain its current exposure.
Recent ETF inflows also show that investor demand can return even while bitcoin remains well below earlier highs. The growth of spot bitcoin investment products has already shown how regulated fund structures can draw both retail and institutional capital. U.S. spot bitcoin and ether ETFs attracted roughly US$1.1 billion in combined net inflows during the week leading into the IBQT launch.
Investors buying IBQT are taking on a small bitcoin allocation during a weaker market, not just after bitcoin has rallied. Portfolio inflows over the next several quarters will provide a better indication of whether this structure can attract capital across different bitcoin market conditions.
Bitcoin Price | 12-Month Market View
BTC/USD market context around the August 10, 2026 launch of BlackRock Canada's IBQT.
Chart: BTC/USD. IBQT began trading on the TSX on August 10, 2026.
Bitcoin risk remains intact. IBQT simplifies access, allocation and custody for the investor. It does not make bitcoin itself less volatile.
Talking Point
IBQT gives bitcoin access to capital that starts with a portfolio decision rather than a separate crypto purchase. Fidelity has already shown the model can reach scale in Canada. BlackRock's entry adds another channel through which growth in conventional investment products can create bitcoin exposure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
August 10, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Competition And Market Structure, Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure
RBC And BMO Sell Moneris But Keep Merchant Distribution
On August 10, 2026, RBC and BMO agreed to sell Moneris to U.S. technology investor Francisco Partners for approximately C$2 billion in cash. The banks own Moneris equally and are expected to receive half of the proceeds each.
The ownership change does not end their commercial relationship with the payments company. RBC and BMO will retain long term referral agreements with Moneris, preserving a route for business banking customers into its merchant services after the sale. RBC expects the transaction to close in the first quarter of its 2027 fiscal year. Until closing, Moneris remains owned by the two banks.
The Banks Are Selling Ownership, Not Merchant Access
RBC and BMO can monetize an asset they created in 2000 without giving up the distribution value tied to their business banking franchises. Moneris continues to receive merchant referrals, while the banks no longer have to own the processor that supports those customers.
The relationship already has commercial depth. BMO clients using Moneris can receive next day deposits into eligible BMO business accounts and access offers tied to the bank relationship. Moneris says the BMO partnership has operated for more than 25 years.
The sale therefore separates two economics that have traditionally aligned together. That's owning the payments platform and controlling access to merchant customers.
TD took a different route last year when it transferred part of its merchant business to Fiserv. That agreement covered roughly 3,400 merchant relationships across 30,000 Canadian locations while TD continued offering merchant services through its banking relationship.
Both structures reduce direct bank ownership or operation of merchant processing while preserving access to business customers. They also show why counterparties are important. Fiserv is now under pressure after cutting its 2026 outlook again, extending the difficulties NCFA tracked after Fiserv's sharp market value decline. Selling infrastructure to a specialist does not remove execution risk. It changes who carries it.
Francisco Partners Is Buying A Large Canadian Payments Platform
Moneris gives Francisco Partners immediate scale in Canadian payments. The company says it supports more than 325,000 points of commerce across Canada and processes roughly one in three Canadian transactions. Its products span in store payments, ecommerce, point of sale software, integrated commerce tools, data and merchant services.
The ownership change impacts Canadian control. One of the country's largest merchant payments platforms is passing from two Canadian banks to a U.S. technology investor. Francisco Partners will control decisions around capital, product investment and growth, even as Moneris remains headquartered and operated in Canada.
After closing, Moneris will be foreign owned but remain Canadian operated. Francisco Partners will control the company, while Moneris is expected to retain its Canadian headquarters and technology infrastructure. That separates ownership of a major Canadian payments platform from where the business and infrastructure are based.
Moneris has also been adding newer payment capabilities. In June, it expanded Konek pay by bank access across Moneris Checkout and its API, allowing merchants to accept eligible bank payments alongside cards.
Francisco Partners already knows payments. Its portfolio includes Verifone, Paysafe and payments enablement provider NMI. The firm also closed $21 billion in new funds in July.
None of that guarantees more investment at Moneris or faster product development. Francisco Partners and Moneris will still have to decide where capital goes, which products deserve priority and how aggressively the company competes with global platforms.
Merchant Acquiring Is Becoming A Specialist Technology Business
Moneris will still face a crowded market after the ownership change. Stripe and Adyen compete heavily around online payments and developer tools. Fiserv uses Clover to combine acquiring with point of sale software and merchant services. Global Payments,Square and other platforms compete across different merchant segments, while Canadian firms such as Nuvei and Paystone add domestic pressure.
Moneris enters that contest with assets competitors cannot quickly reproduce, such as national merchant scale, deep Canadian distribution and long established bank relationships. Its BMO relationship alone includes integrated payment and banking services such as next day settlement.
The challenge is keeping those advantages relevant as payment acceptance becomes more closely tied to software, data and new payment methods. Moneris already partners with outside technology providers across ecommerce, point of sale and integrated payments, while products such as Konek add direct bank payment options alongside card acceptance.
Private ownership could give Moneris more room to invest across those areas. It could also increase pressure to produce stronger returns from a mature payments platform. Neither outcome should be assumed before Francisco Partners takes control and sets its priorities.
The referral agreements reduce one important risk. Moneris is entering private ownership while retaining the bank channels that helped build its merchant base. For RBC and BMO, that may be the strongest part of the transaction. They receive cash for the asset while retaining a commercial connection to the merchants that use it.
Talking Point
RBC and BMO are selling the processor while keeping merchant distribution. Francisco Partners gets the payments platform and the investment risk. The banks get C$2 billion and keep a route to business customers. Which side of that relationship will create more value in the future?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
August 10, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Digital Banking And BaaS, Competition And Market Structure, Open Banking Open Finance And Data Sharing
Payroll Switching Gives TD A New Primary Banking Advantage
On August 10, 2026, TD introduced in-app payroll direct deposit switchingfor Canadian customers using technology built with U.S. fintech Atomic Financial. Eligible customers can redirect their pay to a TD account from inside the TD app instead of downloading a direct deposit form and submitting it to their employer.
TD says the process takes about a minute with most employers. The bank also secured exclusive Canadian rights to the Atomic capability through the end of 2026.
That places payroll switching directly into TD's customer acquisition strategy. Opening a chequing account gives TD a customer. Redirecting the customer's pay can help make TD the account where money arrives, bills get paid and other financial products are used.
Winning The Paycheque Can Be More Valuable Than Opening The Account
TD is already offering eligible customers up to $500 for opening certain chequing accounts and completing qualifying activities, including recurring direct deposit. Moving payroll into the same app reduces one of the steps between opening an account and actually using it as a primary account.
Atomic's direct deposit infrastructureconnects financial apps with payroll providers so customers can change where their pay is routed without leaving the bank's digital experience. Atomic markets the product around deposit growth, account profitability, retention and wallet share, and says its network connects to roughly 90% of U.S. payroll providers.
The commercial logic is visible in Atomic's own product design. Once direct deposit is established, the company wants banks to use that recurring relationship to increase account activity and adoption of other products. Its broader platform also includes payment switching, subscription management and income and employment verification.
There is a Canadian reason to take the friction seriously. An earlier survey of Canadian banking customers found that 35% considered switching institutions too much hassle or too time consuming, while 21% specifically cited difficulty transferring payments or deposits.
Sixty-two percent said they would be open to switching if the process were easier.
TD is attacking a known switching barrier at the point where it can affect deposits, everyday account activity and retention.
A U.S. Fintech Is Supplying Part Of TD's Switching Infrastructure
The customer remains inside TD's app, but some of the infrastructure connecting that customer to payroll systems comes from a U.S. fintech.
Atomic describes itself as infrastructure linking financial applications with payroll accounts and now offers tools for direct deposit, payment switching, bills and subscriptions, income verification and payroll authentication.
That helps explain why a large bank would use outside fintech infrastructure. The real value is in the connections and authentication behind the app. Atomic says its newer CoAuth method produced 2.4 times higher conversion for direct deposit switching in 2025.
TD has used outside connectivity providers before. A previous TD data access agreement with Envestnet Yodlee used APIs to connect TD customer data with third party applications. Years earlier, TD executives were already arguing that standardized APIs could improve Canadian financial services and make account switching easier.
The Atomic arrangement goes further into customer action. Rather than transferring account information to another application, the technology can help redirect where the customer's income is deposited.
TD's Canadian exclusivity gives it a temporary advantage in deploying Atomic's version of that capability. It doesn't stop another bank from developing or sourcing a competing system, but rivals cannot simply take the same Atomic product while TD's exclusivity is in force (remainder of 2026).
Payroll Portability Could Become Another Battleground For Canadian Banks
The difference between opening an account and actually switching banks is still visible in the Canadian market. TD's existing guidance has traditionally required several steps to redirect direct deposits, bill payments and preauthorized debits. Atomic removes one of those handoffs for supported payroll systems.
Canada's consumer-driven banking framework addresses a related but different form of portability. Its initial focus is regulated access to customer approved financial data. Redirecting payroll through Atomic is not open banking, but both deal with reducing the friction involved in changing financial relationships.
TD now has until the end of 2026 to see whether easier payroll switching changes customer behaviour. If direct deposit adoption rises, the benefit could extend into payments, credit, savings and other products. If price, rewards, service or existing relationships matter more, the feature may remain a convenience rather than a lasting advantage.
If automated payroll and payment switching become common across Canadian banking, they could become part of the standard digital account experience rather than a feature that sets one bank apart.
Talking Point
TD is using Atomic to make payroll switching easier and win more primary banking relationships. Will competitors follow and make the rest of a customer’s financial connections just as easy to move.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
August 10, 2026 | NCFA Companies On The Move | Digital Banking And BaaS, Competition And Market Structure
French Banking Licence Extends Revolut’s Global Bank Expansion
On August 10, 2026, Revolut secured a French banking licence from the ACPR and European Central Bank. France will become Revolut's second EU banking base alongside Lithuania, with Germany, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain expected to follow.
Revolut enters this phase with more than 75 million customers and $6 billion of 2025 revenue. It is also building licensed banks in several major markets, which changes the competitive significance of its renewed interest in Canada.
Revolut Now Has Bank-Scale Economics
Revolut's 2025 results show a business well beyond its original foreign-exchange and card proposition. Revenue rose 46% to $6.0 billion, profit before tax reached $2.3 billion and net profit was $1.7 billion. Customer balances reached $67.5 billion.
Eleven product lines generated more than £100 million each. Card payments produced $1.3 billion of revenue, wealth $876 million and foreign exchange $800 million. Revolut Business accounted for 16% of group income.
Credit is becoming substantial enough to change the risk profile. The loan book grew 120% to $2.9 billion across personal loans, credit cards and an early mortgage portfolio, while commercial real estate lending has extended the company into more specialized credit.
Private-market pricing has climbed with the operating results. Revolut completed a secondary transaction at a US$75 billion valuation in November 2025. A new secondary sale confirmed in July 2026 is reportedly pricing the company at US$115 billion. The current sale has not been announced as completed.
Revolut Is Adding Local Banking Operations In Major Markets
The French licence divides Revolut's European banking structure more deliberately. Lithuania remains the banking base for much of the European Economic Area, while the French entity will take responsibility for six Western European markets with roughly 30 million Revolut customers.
Revolut completed the next stage of its UK banking licence in March, launching the bank for a domestic customer base of 13 million after receiving the licence in 2024 and completing its mobilisation period.
Owning more of the banking infrastructure gives Revolut greater control over deposits, credit, payments and pricing. It also requires more local capital, compliance and operating capacity. In Western Europe, Revolut has committed more than €1 billion to the new regional structure and plans to build its headquarters in Paris.
Canada Is A Different Proposition Than It Was In 2019
Revolut's renewed Canada strategy follows an earlier attempt built around prepaid cards and foreign exchange. The company entered a limited Canadian beta in 2019 and withdrew in 2021 without establishing a domestic banking presence.
Jan Pilbauer was appointed to lead Revolut Canada in 2025 after senior roles at Payments Canada and the Bank of Canada. Revolut has described Canada as attractive but remains early in its evaluation. It hasn't announced a launch date, and there is no public evidence of a Canadian bank licence application.
The regulatory setting has changed too. OSFI's Streamlined Approvals Framework creates a clearer federal route for eligible innovative banking models, while consumer-driven banking could reduce data-access barriers once regulated sharing is operating.
Revolut would also be operating a different business. A payments and FX app would add another fintech option. A Canadian operation spanning deposits, credit, wealth and business banking would compete for much more of the customer relationship.
Local Licences Put More Responsibility On Revolut
Italy offers a recent reminder that localization cuts both ways. In April, the country's competition authority fined Revolut entities more than €11 million over investment disclosures, account restrictions and information concerning Italian IBAN availability.
The Italian action touched the same customer-treatment and localization issues Revolut has to manage as more markets gain their own banking entities. Revolut disagreed with the findings and said it would appeal.
Revolut now has the customers, earnings and product breadth to compete much more directly with established banks. Its French licence shows how much regulatory infrastructure that ambition requires. A Canadian return would reveal whether Revolut is prepared to build the same depth here.
NCFA Company Intelligence Snapshot
Revolut
Global payments, banking, credit, wealth and business finance platform
Last updated Aug 10, 2026
Company At A Glance
Founded 2015 by Nik Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko
Headquarters London, United Kingdom
Status Private financial technology and banking group
Customers 75M+ globally
Markets More than 40
2025 Revenue US$6.0B
2025 Net Profit US$1.7B
Customer Balances US$67.5B at Dec 31, 2025
Loan Book US$2.9B at Dec 31, 2025
Valuation US$75B completed valuation; July 2026 secondary sale reportedly at US$115B
Products Payments, cards, deposits, FX, lending, wealth, investing and business finance; availability varies by market
Revenue Model Payments, subscriptions, FX, wealth, lending, interest income and business services
Milestones
Select a milestone to follow Revolut from international payments into locally regulated banking
1 Payments Launch 2015
2 EU Bank Licence 2018
3 Canada Trial 2019–2021
4 US$800M Series E 2021
5 Profitable Scale 2025
6 Local Bank Buildout Jan–Jul 2026
7 French Bank Hub Aug 2026
Milestone 1
Revolut Starts With International Spending (2015)
Nik Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko launched Revolut in London around spending, transfers and foreign exchange.
Company
Revolut Mobile financial technology company
Stage
Launch Initial consumer product
Capital
Early Venture Outside funding follows early adoption
Markets
UK First International spending and transfers
Customers
Consumers Customers seeking cheaper international money use
Competition
Banks And FX Digital alternative to bank foreign-exchange pricing
Additional Company Data
London launch
Mobile-first onboarding
Initial focus on spending and transfers abroad
Why This Milestone Matters
A narrow international-spending problem gave Revolut an entry point before it asked customers to use the app for more of their finances.
Milestone 2
Lithuanian Licence Adds Banking Capability (2018)
The Bank of Lithuania granted Revolut a banking licence in 2018, the regulatory base later used to provide banking services across the European Economic Area.
Company
Revolut Bank Payments business adding banking capability
Stage
Regulated Expansion Banking joins the product base
Capital
US$250M Series C raised in 2018
Markets
European Union Lithuanian regulatory base
Customers
Retail Payments customers gain access to more financial products
Competition
Digital Banking Revolut starts competing beyond payments
Additional Company Data
US$250M Series C valued Revolut at US$1.7B
Revolut Business had launched in 2017
Metal launched in the EEA in 2018
Why This Milestone Matters
The licence gave Revolut a regulated base for deposits and banking services instead of limiting the customer relationship to payments.
Milestone 3
Canada Gets A Limited Version Of Revolut (2019–2021)
Revolut entered Canada with a beta centred on prepaid cards and foreign exchange and withdrew in 2021 without establishing a Canadian bank.
Company
Revolut Canada Beta Partial version of the global product
Stage
Market Trial Entry ends before full banking launch
Capital
Group Funded No Canadian financing disclosed
Markets
Canada Cards and foreign exchange
Customers
Beta Users Narrower product access than in core markets
Competition
Limited Product No full domestic banking proposition
Additional Company Data
Beta began in 2019
No Canadian bank was established
Revolut exited in 2021
Why This Milestone Matters
Canada exposed the difficulty of competing with only part of Revolut's product set.
Milestone 4
US$800 Million Series E Funds A Larger Platform (2021)
SoftBank Vision Fund 2 and Tiger Global backed an US$800 million Series E that valued Revolut at US$33 billion.
Company
Revolut Platform Consumer and business financial services
Stage
Global Scale Product and geographic expansion
Capital
US$800M US$33B Series E valuation
Markets
International Europe with expansion outside the region
Customers
16M+ Customers worldwide at the financing
Competition
Financial Platform More products compete for more customer activity
Additional Company Data
SoftBank Vision Fund 2 and Tiger Global joined as investors
Capital supported U.S., India and other international expansion
Savings, insurance, wealth and trading were part of the product build
Why This Milestone Matters
The Series E financed expansion well beyond the original payments proposition and put Revolut among the world's highest-valued private fintechs.
Milestone 5
Revenue And Profit Catch Up With Customer Growth (2025)
Revolut closed 2025 with 68.3 million retail customers, US$6.0 billion in revenue and US$1.7 billion in net profit. A November secondary transaction valued it at US$75 billion.
Company
Global Financial Platform Retail and business products at large scale
Stage
Profitable Scale Fifth consecutive year of net profitability
Capital
US$75B November secondary valuation
Markets
40+ Markets worldwide
Customers
68.3M Retail 767,000 business customers at year-end
Competition
Primary Banking More customers use Revolut for everyday finances
Additional Company Data
US$67.5B in customer balances
US$2.9B loan portfolio
Eleven product lines above £100M of annual revenue
Jan Pilbauer appointed to lead Revolut Canada
Why This Milestone Matters
Profit and customer balances gave Revolut more capacity to fund lending, licences and local banking operations from a much stronger financial base.
Milestone 6
UK, Mexico And Australia Add Local Banking Operations (Jan–Jul 2026)
Revolut launched full banking in Mexico, exited UK mobilisation and received an unrestricted Australian banking licence. Its U.S. national bank charter remains under review.
Company
Multi-Market Bank Local banks operate within the global platform
Stage
Banking Expansion More markets gain local regulated entities
Capital
Local Balance Sheets Deposits and lending require local capital
Markets
UK, Mexico, Australia U.S. charter application remains pending
Customers
Local Bank Users 13M UK customers and 1M+ Australian retail customers at launch
Competition
Full-Service Banks Deposits and credit deepen competitive overlap
Additional Company Data
UK bank launched in March 2026
Mexico passed 500,000 retail customers
Australia became Revolut's first licensed bank in APAC
U.S. banking still depends on charter approval
Why This Milestone Matters
Local banks let Revolut own more of the deposit, credit and payment relationship instead of depending as heavily on partner institutions.
Milestone 7
France Becomes Revolut's Second EU Banking Base (Aug 2026)
Revolut's French banking licence creates a regional base for France and, progressively, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.
Company
Revolut Banking Group Regional banks inside a global platform
Stage
Regional Scale Second EU banking base
Capital
€1B+ Western Europe investment commitment
Markets
Six Countries France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain
Customers
~30M Across the intended Western European hub
Competition
Local Banking Depth More direct competition with domestic banks
Additional Company Data
Paris will house the Western Europe headquarters
The regional operation adds local risk, compliance and product capacity
Lithuania remains Revolut's other EU banking base
The July secondary share sale is reportedly pricing Revolut at US$115B
Why This Milestone Matters
Revolut is placing more banking responsibility inside the European markets where many of its customers actually live.
Frequently Asked Questions About Revolut
What is Revolut?
Revolut is a London-headquartered financial technology and banking group founded in 2015 by Nik Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko. It offers payments, cards, deposits, foreign exchange, lending, wealth, investing and business financial services, with availability varying by market.
Is Revolut a bank?
Revolut operates licensed banks in several jurisdictions, including the European Economic Area, UK, Mexico and Australia. Its legal entity and customer protections vary by market.
How many customers does Revolut have?
Revolut reports more than 75 million retail customers globally. It ended 2025 with 68.3 million retail customers and 767,000 business customers.
How does Revolut make money?
Revenue comes from card payments, subscriptions, foreign exchange, wealth products, lending and interest income, and Revolut Business. Eleven product lines each generated more than £100 million in 2025.
Is Revolut profitable?
Yes. Revolut reported US$2.3 billion in profit before tax and US$1.7 billion in net profit for 2025.
What is Revolut worth?
A completed November 2025 secondary transaction valued Revolut at US$75 billion. A secondary sale underway in July 2026 is reportedly pricing the company at US$115 billion, but Revolut has not announced that sale as completed.
Is Revolut coming back to Canada?
Revolut has renewed its Canadian effort and appointed Jan Pilbauer to lead the local business. Canada remains under evaluation, with no announced launch date or public evidence of a Canadian bank licence application as of August 10, 2026.
Why did Revolut leave Canada?
Revolut entered Canada in 2019 with a limited beta centred on prepaid cards and foreign exchange and withdrew in 2021 without establishing a Canadian banking presence or the wider product set available in its larger markets.
Who competes with Revolut?
Competitors vary by product and country. Revolut overlaps with traditional banks, digital banks and specialist fintechs across payments, deposits, credit, foreign exchange, investing and business finance.
Information notice: Private-company estimates are identified and attributed. Information may change after the stated update date. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. 
