Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
AI | Oct 22, 2025
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
On October 13 2025, the Economist ran a story 'Can AI replace junior workers?' that analyzed a total of 300,000 companies and found that firms adopting AI hired 7.7% fewer junior employees over six quarters compared with non adopters. These research findings came from a Harvard SSRN study by Seyed Hosseini and Guy Lichtinger, who tracked the introduction of AI integrator roles across a subset of 10,600 of these firms. They found that while senior hiring remained flat, most declines came from reduced job postings rather than layoffs.
In a different study by the Yale Budget Lab review, 'Evaluating the impact of AI on the labour market', found that since 2022 the overall mix of jobs hasn’t changed much yet. Their data also revealed that AI’s effects are starting to appear inside companies now but they haven't yet shown up in national reports.
In Canada, the same early signs are visible. The Future Skills Centre found in 2025 that about half of Canadian workers hold jobs with high AI exposure, and that postings for automatable roles have fallen since 2022. (see: Right Brain Left Brain AI Brain). Statistics Canada’s September 2025 update showed youth unemployment at 14.7%, the highest rate since 2010 excluding pandemic years.
Demand for AI capability is climbing fast though. PwC’s 2025 AI Jobs Barometer found that job postings requiring AI skills made up 1.8% of all listings in Canada in 2024, the highest level recorded. Globally, PwC reported that workers with AI skills now earn a 56% wage premium. Lightcast data confirmed that postings asking for generative AI skills grew from 55 in January 2021 to nearly 10,000 by May 2025.
In 2023, IBM announced a hiring pause for administrative positions likely to be automated, estimating that about 7,800 jobs could eventually be replaced. Two years later by 2025, IBM’s chief executive said that hundreds of jobs had already been automated but new programming and sales roles were added to manage and improve AI systems (read: costs). These new positions required higher pay and technical skill, meaning that overall labour costs rose even as headcount stayed about the same.
PwC’s 2025 report described 4x increase in productivity but increased sending on advanced human oversight due to the specialized staff required to operate and oversee (rather than removing human involvement completely).
The first jobs being cut are entry level analytical roles that once helped graduates learn on the job and grow into future innovators. Without those opportunities, companies risk gaps in the talent pipeline that sustains innovation and good governance.
Among those entry level roles, mid-tier graduates are being hit hardest. They aren't highly specialized enough to keep, and not low enough cost to retain. Data from Harvard and Yale show the same pattern now appearing in Canada’s banking and software sectors, where AI can handle document review and code debugging but not creative or complex work.
Canada’s rate of AI adoption is still lower than in the United States, but the same pressures are starting to appear. Companies that don’t build structured training and mentoring around AI now will likely face skill shortages and higher rehiring costs later.
Harvard data show a 7.7% drop in junior hiring at companies that adopt AI. IBM’s experience confirms that after automating 7,800 jobs, it had to rehire more expensive employees for oversight and compliance work.
Youth unemployment has reached 14.7%, the highest since 2010 outside the pandemic. The first jobs being reduced are early analytical roles that once gave graduates the training and judgment to move into leadership positions.
Among the junior jobs being lost, graduates from mid-tier universities are at the most risk. Their work is often routine enough to automate but not low-cost enough to retain, leaving a growing gap in Canada’s talent base.
PwC found that employees with AI skills earn 56% more on average, but only 1.8% of job postings in Canada mention these skills. Fintechs that start training programs now can close that gap and strengthen their competitive edge.
AI is changing how companies build their workforce, not just how they cut costs. The data show that when junior jobs disappear, the long-term cost is a weaker talent pipeline and higher spending to rebuild skills later. Investing in AI training, early-career development, and responsible oversight will pay off later in productivity and help drive competitiveness.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Fintech Competition | Oct 21, 2025

Image: Freepik/kues1
On October 8 2025, QED Investors and Oliver Wyman released Seizing the Bank Charter Moment (37 page PDF), tracking that fintechs filed more than 20 charter applications in 2025 (3x the number in 2023). The analysis found that obtaining a charter reduced funding costs by 150 to 300 basis points and improved net interest margins by 2 to 4%, driven by access to insured deposits and direct payment rails.
Also, on October 16 2025, Innovate Finance published Challenger Banks: A British Success Story (28 page PDF) confirming that UK challengers now hold about 25% of SME business current accounts and provide 60% of SME lending, up from under 5% seven years earlier.
The report found that fintechs with a bank charter earn an average return on equity of 14 to 16%, compared with 9 to 10% for those still operating as non-banks. The analysis outlined three main ways fintechs can hold a charter: (1) Full national bank charter; (2) Industrial loan company model that allows more flexibility for parent investors; and (3) Limited-purpose charter that does not take deposits but still falls under direct supervision.
The report shows that about 20 new applications had been filed by fintechs and new entrants, at the time of publishing. The Financial Technology Association said this renewal of new fintech charter bank activity can help increase competition. FDIC officials noted that the total number of US banks has fallen from roughly 8,500 in 2008 to 4,500 today, strengthening the case to restore market entry options.
For growing fintechs, the economic break-even point for considering the bank charter pathway is around $5 billion in assets and a return on equity above 12%. Meaning beyond that level, the cost savings from having a charter more than offset the added compliance and capital requirements. Even with about $50 to $100 million in new capital requirements and $8 to $12 million in yearly compliance costs, the charter still provides a net advantage.
As an aside, the lower cost of capital for chartered banks comes from structure, not size. Non-banks depend on wholesale funding or partner-bank arrangements that add about 1.5 to 3% to their cost of money because these funds are not insured. And chartered banks fund mainly through insured deposits, giving them a built-in advantage even after paying for regulatory oversight.
Innovate Finance report shows that challenger and specialist banks increased their small business lending to £110 billion in 2024 (about $140 billion CAD), which is 4.5% higher than the year before. The British Business Bank reports that these banks now provide about 60% of all lending to UK small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), a significant achievement.
However, the report warns that upcoming rules under Basel 3.1 and the Small Domestic Deposit Taker (SDDT) regime could make it harder for smaller banks to lend. They estimate that the new rules could reduce small business lending by up to £44 billion, which they describe as a potential tax on growth. Their Think Challenger proposal calls for more balanced regulation so that smaller, well-managed banks can continue to support small firms and customers while staying safe and sound.
This UK's experience offers clear lessons for Canada; that clear and fair (proportionate) rules can encourage innovation and competition while maintaining trust and stability in the system.
For larger banks, the benefits of collaboration are also visible. Institutions that work with challenger banks or fintechs on digital credit and data analytics see 10 to 15% faster deposit growth compared with those that compete alone.
In July 2025, the federal government began consulting on how to update the country’s deposit insurance system. Open banking including accreditation rules are expected to appear in the fall budget. The Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA) is now fully in effect, bringing both domestic and international payment firms under the supervision of the Bank of Canada. Together these steps strengthen oversight but do not yet create a path for fintechs to operate as full banks.
For policymakers, both reports referenced in this article are evidence that fair and proportionate rules for capital and licensing help increase competition and small business lending without creating extra risk. Canada could adopt a tiered model where smaller fintech lenders meet simpler capital and reporting standards based on their size and activities, while full deposit-taking banks continue to meet the higher bar.
Canada doesn't yet have a charter pathway for fintechs or smaller non-bank lenders. Introducing a proportionate licensing framework with a transparent and time-bound review process would improve predictability, attract investment, and show that Canada is open to fintech banking innovation.
For fintech founders, timing, a level playing field and the ability to innovate and compete without structural barriers now matters. For investors, the valuation gap is becoming clear. In the US, fintech banks with charters trade at about 1.6 times book value, compared with 1.1 times for similar lenders without charters. A well-defined Canadian charter model could close that gap and attract more long-term domestic investment into fintech banking.
The simple truth is when proportionate rules are clear and scaled to risk, competition improves, credit costs go down, and innovation thrives. The UK and US results show that proportionate regulation produces measurable gains in lending and economic resilience. Canada now has a short window in 2025 to enable domestic fintechs a fair chance to grow and succeed at home.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
RPAA | Oct 21, 2025

Image: Freepik
On October 2025, the Bank of Canada (BoC) launched the first public Registry of Payment Service Providers (PSPs), a key milestone under the Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA). The registry lists all PSPs formally registered to operate under the new retail payments framework. The database is updated regularly and can be accessed via the Bank’s official site at the PSP Registry.
The BoC also published an active list of PSP applicants currently under review, available at the applicants under review page. These applicants are subject to preliminary oversight requirements but are only required to meet full reporting obligations once registration is finalized.
According to the registry’s initial snapshot, a total of 320 PSPs have been registered to date. Of these, 259 (80.9%) are headquartered in Canada, while 43 (13.4%) are based in the United States, and 9 (2.8%) in the United Kingdom. The remainder represent smaller international participation from Singapore, Ireland, Brazil, Latvia, the Philippines, Switzerland, Belgium, and South Korea.
This mix shows that the RPAA’s first tranche of providers is mostly domestic, reflecting the strength of Canada’s homegrown fintech payments sector while integrating a limited number of major international players. The balance of local and foreign PSPs also highlights the regulatory gateway now established for cross-border payment innovation.
The combined data from the Bank of Canada’s PSP Registry and the applicants under review provides a broader picture of participation under the Retail Payment Activities Act, and deeper insight of the provider demand and distribution.
Canada continues to lead with the majority of registrations followed by the United States and the United Kingdom. This balance reflects both the maturity of domestic fintech operations and growing international engagement with Canada’s payments oversight framework.
The table data below summarized by country shows how Canada accounts for roughly 84% of all PSP entities registered or in review, while international applicants from the United States, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions signal increasing cross-border participation.
| Head office country | Registered PSPs | Applicants Under Review | Total PSP Entities | Share (%) |
| Canada | 259 | 1095 | 1354 | 84.26 |
| United States of America (the) | 43 | 105 | 148 | 9.21 |
| United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the) | 9 | 30 | 39 | 2.43 |
| Singapore | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.56 |
| Hong Kong | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.44 |
| Latvia | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.25 |
| United Arab Emirates (the) | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.25 |
| Estonia | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.19 |
| Lithuania | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.19 |
| Spain | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.19 |
| Nigeria | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.12 |
| Cyprus | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.12 |
| Isle of Man | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.12 |
| Australia | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.12 |
| Korea (the Republic of) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Poland | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Yemen | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Sweden | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| San Marino | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Czechia | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Malta | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Malaysia | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Kazakhstan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Israel | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| China | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Belgium | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| India | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Japan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Denmark | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Mauritius | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Gibraltar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Ireland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Brazil | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Philippines (the) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.06 |
| Cayman Islands (the) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
Registered PSPs are now under supervisory assessment by the Bank of Canada and must comply with RPAA requirements on operational risk management, safeguarding of end-user funds, and reporting. Additional guidance and summary documents are available under the Bank’s retail payments supervision.
The registry’s release coincides with the expansion of Payments Canada membership eligibility, effective September 29, 2025. Under this change, registered and supervised PSPs are now eligible to join Payments Canada, alongside credit union locals and clearing system operators overseen by the Bank. The update outlined in the Statement by the Minister of Finance, connects the RPAA framework with Canada’s broader payment system modernization goals.
The live PSP registry is a major step towards a transparent and accountable retail payments system designed to enhance trust and innovation. With a majority of Canadian fintechs now operating under Bank of Canada oversight.
As Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers noted in her recent remarks before the Canadian Club Toronto, competition is a critical force in improving productivity and efficiency across the economy.
While the new registry helps level the playing field by providing a formal pathway for smaller fintechs to operate alongside larger incumbents in a regulated environment, there is limited number of PSPs currently registered under the Retail Payment Activities Act raises questions about Canada’s ability to compete globally in payments innovation. With only 259 Canadian payment providers currently registered, the framework captures a small fraction of the fintech firms operating in the country.
Larger and more established companies are the most likely to meet the Bank of Canada’s supervision requirements, while smaller fintechs face higher barriers to entry. These include detailed operational risk controls, safeguarding of end-user funds, and ongoing reporting costs that can be more challenging to address for early stage businesses.
In other markets such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, regulators use tiered systems that allow smaller firms to start with lighter oversight and scale up as they grow. Canada does not yet have this flexibility with the RPAA a single registration and supervision framework for all payment service providers (PSPs). Without an adjustment, the current model could reduce competition and slow the growth of homegrown payment innovators, as global players expand into the Canadian market.
The Bank of Canada’s framework seems stable and transparent but expanding participation over time will be key to ensuring the RPAA supports Canada’s fintech competitiveness.
As more PSPs complete the review process, the registry will expand and evolve, providing clearer insight into Canada’s payments ecosystem. For fintech stakeholders, this signals that full RPAA implementation is moving from policy design to operational reality.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Fintech Risks | Oct 20, 2025
Image: Freepik/Rawpixel.com
On October 16, 2025, Bank of Canada (BoC) Governor Tiff Macklem joined Adam Posen at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) in Washington for a public conversation about Canada’s economic outlook and global trade. Macklem said new tariffs, slower trade, and changing supply chains are impacting the Canadian economy.
As a result, he explained that the BoC is now using several possible economic paths instead of one fixed forecast because global uncertainty has become constant. The new approach was outlined in the Bank’s July 2025 Monetary Policy Report and compares what could happen if tariffs stay the same, ease, or rise, and indicates the impact of each option on inflation, output, and interest rates.
Macklem described four forces that will impact the next 10 years for Canada:
1. Trade now clusters around three main hubs led by the United States, China, and the European Union. The United States still dominates world finance even as investors question its safe haven status, and other countries like Singpore pushing above their weight.
2. Global trade and money flows are becoming uneven again (a recurring structural issue). Some regions keep running big surpluses while others, including North America, rely more on borrowing. Macklem said this growing imbalance adds risk to the global financial system and limits how much small economies like Canada can control their outcomes.
3. He said higher tariffs and unpredictable policy weaken demand, raise costs, and reduce the efficiency of supply.
4. Canada is feeling these pressures through weaker exports, slower investment, and lower productivity growth, outcomes that no interest rate decision can reverse.
Traditional forecasts assume one view of the world. Macklem explained that the Bank now works with three possible paths. One assumes current tariffs remain. One assumes tensions ease. One assumes further escalation.
The aim is to keep inflation expectations stable while helping households and businesses adjust to uncertainty. For fintechs and lenders, strategic business planning must now be built around several credible economic futures too, and not rely on a single base case. Funding, pricing, and credit policies should be tested against each path to stay resilient no matter which reality unfolds.
Macklem explained that new tariffs and complex rules are adding cost and delay at the Canada–U.S. border, disrupting supply chains. Firms that once relied on integrated supply chains now need new suppliers, new routes, and stricter compliance to maintain trade eligibility. That adds cost and delays that ripple across sectors. Even service firms are affected through their clients and vendors.
For fintechs offering trade finance, payments, or working capital products, this environment creates opportunity but also exposure to new risks. There is demand for tools that make international transactions faster and more transparent, but also new risks tied to client sectors under pressure.
The Governor stressed that raising productivity is now essential. He pointed to faster project approvals, fewer internal trade barriers, and stronger transport links as priorities to open new pathways.
The Bank’s recent reports say that fixing long-term barriers in the economy like slow project approvals or weak competition can improve growth more than changing interest rates (aka, monetary policy).
Fintechs can build solutions that help reduce administrative frictions, such as digital identity and onboarding tools can eliminate duplication between provinces. Compliance automation and regulatory technology can shorten approval times. Procurement platforms can help smaller firms reach national customers. These are examples of direct responses to the barriers that Macklem said must be addressed.
Macklem also spoke about the neutral interest rate which is the level that keeps inflation stable without stimulating or slowing the economy. He said it may not align between Canada and the United States because productivity growth and fiscal policies differ. That divergence affects long term funding costs and the flow of investment capital.
For fintechs that borrow in U.S. dollars or rely on foreign investors, funding costs and access to cash can change even if central banks don’t move rates. The safest approach is to plan for different interest rate outcomes instead of assuming Canada and the U.S. will always move together.
When asked about digital assets, Macklem said the Bank’s work on stablecoins and a possible central bank digital currency focuses on preserving trust and value. The principle of the singleness of money means that one Canadian dollar must hold the same worth everywhere, whether in cash or digital form.
Stablecoin systems must avoid runs and guarantee convertibility. For fintech developers and innovators, it means creating systems that work within the regulated financial system, not outside. The most promising area is making international payments faster, cheaper, and clearer, while ensuring every digital dollar is fully backed and can always be redeemed.
Uncertainty is no longer an exception but a normal condition for business and policy. Every possible trade path changes inflation, growth, and the cost of capital. Fintech founders, investors, and lenders must build this thinking into their models and operations. That includes ready plans for each scenario, triggers for risk adjustments, and playbooks for client support when tariffs or rates move unexpectedly.
The firms that incorporate this discipline and governance will not only manage volatility better but also build trust with investors and customers who highly value predictability in uncertain times.
It's time for Canada to demonstrate adaptability, and treat uncertainty as a given design factor instead of a sudden surprise. Canada’s financial ecosystem, from established lenders to digital innovators, must treat uncertainty as a normal part of planning. Fintechs that adopt scenario planning, streamline processes, and improve real economy efficiency can help Canada compete globally even as the trading system fragments.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Anti-Fraud | Oct 20, 2025

Image: Freepik
On October 20 2025, the Department of Finance Canada released plans for a National Anti-Fraud Strategy that will be introduced through Budget 2025. The initiative is designed to combat growing financial fraud, scams, and economic abuse that affects millions of Canadians every year.
According to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, Canadians lost $645 million to fraud in 2024 (almost a 300% increase since 2020), noting only 5-10% of scams are ever reported. The government says the new strategy aims to reverse that trend through prevention, data sharing, and stronger oversight across financial and digital channels.
Honourable Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety:
“Today’s financial criminals make use of every modern tool at their disposal to try to defraud Canadians. Our government’s new Strategy is tackling head-on the threat posed by these fraudsters. A stand-alone Agency to fight financial crime is critical to maintaining confidence in our financial system, and keeping people, and their money, safe.”
As an early step, Budget 2025 will propose amendments to the Bank Act that would require banks to:
The changes are expected to strengthen consumer control and protection, especially for seniors, newcomers, and other vulnerable groups.
The government also intends to create a new Financial Crimes Agency by spring 2026. This federal agency would lead investigations into money laundering, organized crime, and online fraud, bringing together financial, legal, and law enforcement expertise to recover illicit funds. Rules to formally establish the agency is expected in 2026 after consultation with the Ministers of Justice and Public Safety.
The government will also work with banks and stakeholders to develop a voluntary Code of Conduct for the Prevention of Economic Abuse. The code will set clear expectations for how financial institutions identify and respond to economic abuse, a type of financial control and coercion that often targets women and seniors. Work will be guided by principles of victim focused support, collaboration, and financial empowerment.
Banks (perhaps with the help of financial technology providers) will play a key role as front-line institutions that can detect early signs of financial control or distress and provide safe guidance for clients to regain independence.
For fintech companies, the emerging anti-fraud legislation means there's a strong focus on consumer trust and financial resilience. Stricter fraud controls for banks will also apply to their fintech partners through compliance expectations and data standards.
Fintech firms that build strong fraud detection and digital ID tools will have an advantage, finding it easier to work with banks while everyone benefits from a safer financial system. Companies that are transparent, secure, and possess strong governance will earn public and institutional trust.
The creation of a Financial Crimes Agency also opens new opportunities for collaboration between the public and private sectors on cyber risk, data sharing, and proceeds of crime recovery.
While the full framework, funding, and timeline details will be presented at Budget 2025, protecting Canadians from financial fraud is a national priority, raising the minimum bar for a trusted digital economy.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Oct 20, 2025

Image: Freepik/wirestock, Reykjavik
Are you planning to extend your business reach to Iceland, known for its innovative economy and tech-savvy population? Are you searching for an efficient way to communicate with Icelandic contacts without facing the high costs associated with international dialing? Or maybe you're interested in maintaining your privacy while engaging with this unique market? Virtual numbers, particularly those provided by Virtnum.com, offer a remarkable solution, allowing for smooth, secure communication channels with Iceland. Let's dive into the advantages of utilizing an Icelandic virtual number through Virtnum.com and how it can significantly enhance your communication strategy.
In the global marketplace, creating a local presence can dramatically enhance your business's credibility and accessibility. An Icelandic virtual number allows you to establish this presence, making it easier and more affordable for individuals in Iceland to reach you. This local approach not only facilitates better communication but also strengthens your brand's reputation within the Icelandic community. Virtnum.com ensures that this critical connection is both straightforward and effective, aiding your successful entry into the Icelandic market.
In today’s interconnected world, protecting your personal and business communications is crucial. Opting for an Icelandic virtual number through Virtnum.com is a strategic step in safeguarding your privacy. This approach allows you to interact within the Icelandic market while keeping your actual contact information confidential. This level of privacy is invaluable, ensuring peace of mind for both individuals and businesses looking to explore or expand in Iceland.
Virtnum.com is dedicated to providing a user-friendly experience, ensuring that acquiring and utilizing an Icelandic virtual number is hassle-free. There’s no need for physical SIM cards or complicated setups; your virtual number is ready to use almost immediately. Moreover, the ability to forward calls to any device ensures that you remain connected to your Icelandic contacts, no matter where your travels or business may take you.
Adopting an Icelandic virtual number from Virtnum.com is a cost-effective choice. It enables you to avoid expensive international call fees, allowing you and your Icelandic associates to enjoy local call rates. This affordability is particularly advantageous for businesses and individuals aiming for frequent communication with Iceland without incurring significant costs.
Beginning your journey to enhanced connectivity in Iceland is seamless with Virtnum.com. Simply visit their website, choose the Icelandic virtual number that best suits your needs, and follow the easy setup instructions. With Virtnum.com’s dependable service and dedicated customer support, you're assured a smooth and effective experience from the outset.
An Icelandic virtual number from Virtnum.com is more than just a tool for communication; it’s a strategic asset for anyone looking to engage effectively with Iceland.
Whether your goals involve business expansion, privacy enhancement, or streamlined communication, Virtnum.com provides a powerful, user-friendly platform to meet your needs. Embrace the future of communication with an Icelandic virtual number from Virtnum.com and open new doors to opportunities in Iceland today.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Bank of Canada | Oct 14, 2025

While almost everyone knows and/or has come to the same conclusion at one point or another, to hear the Bank of Canada's Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers deliver the same warning at the Canadian Club in Toronto on October 9, 2025, signals that perhaps the political critics against introducing more innovation and competition in the banking industry are going to have to acquiesce or Canada's economy and living standards will continue to crumble. The Bank of Canada's speech veers from the institutions usual restraint, which was published under the speech title, 'Productivity's competitive edge'.
In short, Rogers said while Canada’s banking system remains stable, it is also highly concentrated, a structure now holding back innovation, competition, and national productivity. Below we break down some of the key and relevant quotes.
1. “It would also be hard to argue, on any objective measure, that Canada’s banking system is anything other than an oligopoly.”
Rogers’ statement cut through years of careful language. Six institutions dominate almost every part of the financial system. When a few players control access to credit, payments, and capital, competition (and thus productivity) slows. Oligopolist margins stay high not from efficiency but from market power.
Consumers face limited choice, and startups face unfair barriers that restrict their ability to grow.
Over time, and in the face of growing geopolitical risk, the impact of stagnation ripples across the economy as productivity weakens, innovation slows, and the cost of doing business is stubbornly high.
2. “The six largest banks collectively hold about 93 percent of all banking assets.”
It's immensely profitable for banks to scale without real competition. When a handful of banks dominate that are protected by the government, the incentive to innovate diminishes.
New entrants face steep obstacles that make entry prohibitively expensive. Customer mobility is low because switching banks is difficult, and incumbents have little reason to compete on service or cost.
This level of concentration kills inertia before it's had a chance to get off the ground. A sort of regulatory conservatism where policy focuses on maintaining stability instead of competition and encouraging growth.
It also contributes to the misallocation of capital, with funding often directed toward established low-risk assets instead of dynamic and productive new ventures.
3. “Many argue that this level of concentration has clear negative impacts on productivity, innovation, capital allocation, cost and consumer choice.”
The adverse impacts of this prolonged conservative approach is visible in every part of the financial system. Weakened competitive pressure keep fees high and innovation limited. Fintech firms and non banks are stifled by access restrictions and a lack of infrastructure sharing.
The dominance of large incumbents has created a drag on productivity, discouraging foreign and domestic investment in innovative financial technologies and systems. Regulators, under constant lobbying pressure from powerful incumbent players, risk capture and caution.
Consumers end up paying more, while the wider economy suffers from slower capital formation and lower economic growth.
4. “Greater contestability, more new entrants and more innovation in our financial sector would lead to competition that’s good for consumers, for productivity and for our economy.”
Rogers' speech didn't stop at the problems. She pointed directly at the solutions that are actively in Canada's financial innovation pipeline that would open markets and increase contestability (read: competition).
Real Time Rail and open banking were designed to do just that. Both initiatives aim to make payments faster and more accessible while empowering consumers to use their data to get better services.
Yet both have been slowed by lack of political urgency. Every delay reinforces the oligopoly’s power and widens Canada’s productivity gap with other advanced economies.
5. “We should lean into it.”
Rogers closed by calling for action. Canada’s stability is valuable, but without competition, it becomes stagnation. Stability alone cannot deliver growth or innovation.
The future depends on whether policymakers are willing to favour market openness, accountability, and the kind of innovation that allows new participants to compete on equal ground.
While Canada’s policymakers have inched towards open banking and Real Time Rails, political will remains uncertain. The government signalled intent in previous statements, and regulators have continued to prepare the technical frameworks.
However industry and fintech groups and business leaders need visible deadlines, transparent implementation plans, and strong data rights today, not years from now after already waiting half a decade.
But rhetoric could be changing into real momentum because Canada's back is up against the wall and success depends on whether political leaders, not only regulators, commit to timelines, accountability, and measurable progress.
The federal economic budget is due this fall, and if the statement lacks specific commitments, the oligopoly will remain untouched yet again. If it includes firm milestones, open access, and clear delivery dates, Canada could finally begin to modernize its financial infrastructure and restore productivity growth.
By calling Canada’s banking system an oligopoly, the Bank of Canada directly linked banking concentration to productivity. Real Time Rails and open banking are are linchpins to unlock competition, expand consumer choice, and modernize how money moves. The National Crowdfunding and Fintech Association of Canada continues to advocate for more competition, access to capital, and policy frameworks that enable fintech innovation.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |