Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
AI Infrastructure | Sep 17, 2025

Image: Freepik
On 16 September 2025, the UK US Tech Prosperity Deal was announced at £31 billion, coinciding with President Donald Trump’s state visit where the UK rolled out a royal reception, and the leaders framed the partnership as a new era in digital and industrial cooperation. The deal involves unprecedented commitments from American tech giants:
The UK positioned AI as a national mission. On 9 September 2025, ministers reported that UK AI firms had already attracted £2.9 billion (~$3.9 billion USD) in investment over the prior year, signalling momentum ahead of Trump's state visit.
Government officials emphasized sovereign compute, ensuring that the infrastructure to train and deploy frontier AI models exists domestically. They linked the deal to broader reforms including streamlined planning approvals for data centres, accelerated clean energy delivery, and the designation of new AI Growth Zones in regions such as Northumberland.
Taken together, the policy mix signalled to global investors that Britain was serious about matching research excellence with infrastructure capacity, backed by visible political commitment.
The government stressed that the agreement did not include scrapping the 2% Digital Services Tax, which generates £800 million (~$1.1 billion USD) annually, and did not provide blanket copyright concessions.
Others noted that the broader UK-US discussions included trade measures beyond AI. For example, analysis highlighted a quota allowing 100,000 UK cars into the United States annually at a reduced 10% tariff.
While not officially part of the AI deal, the above measures reinforced the perception that Britain was tying technology, industry, and trade policy together in a comprehensive partnership.
Canada continues to lead in AI research through world class institutes in Toronto, Montreal, and Edmonton. The federal Pan-Canadian AI Strategy was renewed in 2024 with $2 billion CAD (≈£1.2 billion, ~$1.5 billion USD) to strengthen science and commercialization.
Domestic players are also committing significant sums. Telus pledged more than C$70 billion (~£41 billion, ~$52 billion USD) over several years to expand data centres and digital infrastructure. It's a plus but Canada has not attracted comparable foreign megadeals in AI infrastructure.
Structural challenges include slower permitting processes, uncertainty in clean energy delivery for high requirement data centres, and the absence of high profile government 'priming the pump' signalling openness to international megadeals.
Another barrier is geographic location. U.S. hyperscalers can serve Canadian markets directly from data centres located just across the border, avoiding regulatory delays and high Canadian energy costs. This weakens Canada’s case for domestic megadeals, as firms see little urgency to build new infrastructure within Canada if American facilities can already reach Canadian customers efficiently.
NCFA has cautioned that without pairing research excellence with infrastructure investment and supportive policy, Canada risks eroding its leadership.
The UK secured global AI megadeals by aligning industrial policy, trade leverage, and regional development with diplomatic visibility. This multi-pronged approach reassured US tech giants that their investments would be politically and commercially supported. Canada needs to translate research prestige into large scale international infrastructure commitments and risks losing ground in the AI race unless it combines science with infrastructure and policy.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Competition | Sep 15, 2025
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
On September 15, 2025, Sarah Cardell, Chief Executive of the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), delivered a speech at the BVCA Summit outlining how competition policy can drive investment and scale-ups. This article summarizes the CMA’s takeaways, benchmarks them against Canada’s position, and explores what lessons fintech leaders and policymakers should draw on.
The CMA stressed that long regulatory delays deter investors and can cause promising startups to fail before securing capital. To address this, the CMA introduced new performance indicators to shorten merger review timelines and committed to streamlining processes across its work.
“Delay chills investment and can mean promising startups run out of road.”
Excessive or outdated regulation can create costs and risks that stifle investment and innovation. The CMA promises to act proportionately, weighing costs and benefits carefully, phasing out outdated remedies, and focusing on the issues most relevant to consumers and businesses.
“We will act proportionately and minimise costs wherever we can.”
Uncertainty in regulatory outcomes undermines investor confidence. The CMA is introducing clearer jurisdictional guidance for merger reviews and publishing detailed roadmaps under its new digital markets regime to provide businesses with greater certainty.
“Uncertainty can stall decision-making and weaken business and investor confidence.”
The CMA emphasized the importance of open and direct engagement with stakeholders. It is creating new forums such as the Growth and Investment Council and deploying stakeholder surveys to improve how its policies reflect commercial realities.
“The CMA is more committed than ever to the fundamentals of our role – to promote competition and protect consumers, within an independent regime.”
Measured against the CMA’s framework, below we try to rank how Canada performs for fintech competitiveness and investment.
We can look at the past for data-driven proof that Canadian fintechs face chronic delays that slow capital raising and partnerships. Open banking has missed multiple government deadlines, leaving fintechs and banks without full clarity of the program.
Another example is around payment modernization, particularly the Real Time Rail (RTR) which has also faced repeated setbacks, stalling innovation in faster payments. Let's not forget the creation and rollout of equity crowdfunding rules that took years to harmonize nationally under NI 45-110, meaning startups endured fragmented frameworks for far too long. In an era where global regulators must keep pace with innovation, Canada's slower regulatory pace is a drag on growth.
Overlapping and duplicative rules increase compliance costs disproportionately for startups. Equity crowdfunding portals are a good example. Under National Instrument 45-110, portals must register as restricted dealers, maintain minimum working capital, and comply with know-your-client and suitability requirements similar to investment dealers, even though transaction sizes are capped at $1.5 million per year.
These requirements add legal, audit, and technology costs that are heavy for small portals but don't always provide proportionate consumer protection benefits, since investment limits already restrict retail investor exposure. The result is fewer viable portals, reduced competition, and higher costs for startups seeking to raise capital. Payments firms navigating multiple oversight bodies face similar burdens. Competition Act amendments have broadened investigative powers, but without a clear proportionality test for smaller firms. This creates uncertainty and often deters new entrants.
Canada has stalled on open banking and been inconsistent on payments modernization, leaving both fintechs and banks unsure about what rules to plan around. Licensing and regulatory approaches often lack clear roadmaps, meaning firms cannot anticipate timelines or likely outcomes. This erodes investor confidence at exactly the point when fintechs need greater visibility and confidence support. By contrast, the CMA now publishes roadmaps and consults on jurisdictional thresholds in advance.
Regulators in Canada conduct consultations but feedback loops can be slow and often opaque, discouraging stakeholders from participating. It reminds of a Stephen King quote, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on both of us." Stakeholders rarely see how their input affects outcomes.
In fintech licensing and payments reform, firms report long periods of silence, creating uncertainty and wasted preparation costs. Engagement exists but is not structured to produce rapid clarity. The CMA, by contrast, has set up a Growth and Investment Council and targeted outreach to startups, making process improvements measurable and visible.
What further distinguishes the CMA approach is its focus on measurable outcomes. Timelines, KPIs, and stakeholder feedback are built directly into its reform process. In Canada, regulators rarely hold themselves to outcome metrics. Open banking, payments modernization, and fintech licensing all lack clear outcome based benchmarks for success with transparent reporting, leaving startups and investors facing prolonged uncertainty.
Cardell highlighted procurement as a powerful lever for scaling firms. In the UK, public procurement represents £385 billion annually. Used strategically, it can help innovative firms scale into global leaders.
Canada’s Phoenix pay system failure illustrates what happens when procurement excludes startups and fintechs. Instead of relying solely on a single legacy vendor, the government could have piloted payroll fintechs and scaled those that proved reliable. This approach would have reduced project risk, avoided billions in overruns, and nurtured homegrown fintechs with export potential. The Phoenix example demonstrates why procurement should be used to actively build capacity for Canadian innovators, which can be accomplished in several ways.
Government is the largest single purchaser in the economy, and directing even a fraction of that demand toward fintech solutions can create the credibility these firms need to raise capital and expand. For example, the government could launch vendor challenges for small business lending platforms or digital payment systems for rebates, benefits, and tax refunds. Winning firms would gain real contracts that prove their technology works and make it easier to raise more investment. This type of procurement not only meets government requirements but helps Canadian fintechs grow at home and compete abroad.
Too often, fintechs win small pilots but never graduate to meaningful contracts. A staged model, where early pilots can transition into scaled adoption if they meet performance benchmarks, would help promising firms grow into national providers. This escalator effect is critical in financial technology, where credibility with one large client can unlock commercial opportunities globally.
Fintechs often face a Catch-22 where they can't win major contracts without clear regulatory status, yet regulators hesitate to provide clarity until the firm has proven market traction. Procurement could break this cycle by acting as a regulatory bridge. If a fintech wins a vendor challenge for services such as digital identity or payments, the process could be designed to include early regulatory sign-off or tailored supervisory guidance. This would give the fintech and its backers confidence about compliance costs and expectations, while also reassuring the public that safeguards are in place from the start.
Taken together, the above examples could use government procurement as a genuine scale-up escalator. So instead of simply selecting incumbents all the time and concentrate risks into a handful of providers that turn into an oligopoly, government purchasing could become a purposeful tool for nurturing Canadian fintechs into globally competitive firms.
The CMA’s speech discusses competition as a tool for unlocking growth. For Canada’s fintech sector, three lessons stand out.
If Canada embraced the UK's stance on competition and scale-ups, fintechs would move faster from idea to scale, investors would back firms with greater confidence, and procurement would foster globally competitive players.
Competition shouldn't be seen as a hand-brake but rather as the engine for Canadian productivity and growth.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
AI Research Report | Sep 15, 2025

Image: Banking Use of Agentic AI (Figue 1, MIT Insights Survey 2025)
A recent MIT Technology Review Insights survey of 250 global banking executives found that 70% of banks already use agentic AI, with 16% running live deployments and 52% in pilots. For Canadian financial institutions and fintechs, the race is on with global competitors embedding AI solutions into compliance, fraud prevention, and customer service at scale.
Fraud detection and IT security are setting the pace. More than half of executives report that agentic AI is already highly capable in fraud detection (56%) and security (51%), with efficiency gains and customer experience improvements each cited by 41%. These use cases are significant because fraud losses are rising and regulators are upping their game on cyber resilience.
Practical applications include mortgage underwriting, small business lending, collections, dispute resolution, and know-your-customer KYC compliance. By using agentic agents together with expert human oversight, banks are compressing decision times from weeks to days and freeing time for employees to focus on higher value work.
As HSBC’s Ian Glasner puts it, “Think of agentic AI as like an intern helping you get all of the more simplistic tasks done, but the human is still there to oversee and take the final decision.”

Image: MIT Insights Banking Survey 2025 (Figure 6 Challenges, Agentic AI)
The survey also suggests that adoption challenges are growing, top three barriers include: 1. Governance, risk, and compliance (63%), 2. Shortage of technology skills (58%), and 3. Poor data quality and integration (54%).
To overcome, Canadian banks and fintechs should focus on resolving weak data linkages across silos and the shortage of AI ready talent needed to scale responsibly.
Trust compounds the issue. An EY study found that only 42% of consumers trust financial institutions to manage AI in their best interest, while 30% say they do not trust them at all. That leaves a net trust level of just 12%. In Canada, regulators are focused on consumer protection, and fintechs that build trust into their AI systems could gain an edge.
Leading institutions are building playbooks worth watching. DBS Bank in Singapore applies its PURE framework (Purposeful, unsurprising, respectful, and easy) to explain all customer facing AI systems. If performance metrics breach preset limits, a kill switch halts the system in real time. As DBS’s Nimish Panchmatia warns, “Agentic AI is a continuous journey. If done properly, there’s significant value at the end of it. But you have to persevere.”
HSBC maintains a detailed inventory of AI systems tied to business owners, risk classifications, and model documentation to create a governance baseline across 200,000 employees in more than 50 markets.
For Canadian banks and fintechs, these approaches show the value of aligning governance and technical innovation before scaling widely.
Banks in Asia, Europe, and the U.S. are experimenting with AI at pace, and many are moving from pilots to enterprise adoption. For Canada, efficiency and risk controls are only part of the story. The real differentiator will be who earns the confidence of consumers while scaling responsibly. Agile fintechs can seize this opening. Unlike large banks weighed down by legacy systems and regulatory complexity, fintechs can design AI solutions that are transparent, accountable, and 'trust first' from the start.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |