Category Archives: Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health

Are Non-Bank Firms Getting Closer To Limited Direct Settlement Access?

May 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Intelligence Question | Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

NCFA Intelligence that shapes what’s next

Policymakers Test Narrower Payment Access Models For Qualified Non Bank Firms

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Status: Building

Organizations: Federal Reserve, Neo, Interac, Tether, Government of Georgia

The answer is moving toward yes, but through tighter gates. Regulators are not opening settlement systems to every fintech. They are testing whether some firms can reach parts of the settlement layer without becoming banks.

  • The Federal Reserve’s proposed Payment Account framework is the clearest sign so far. Eligible firms could support specific payment and reserve functions, but without intraday credit, discount window access, interest on balances, or full Master Account rights.
  • Neo’s direct access to Interac e-Transfer shows the model already exists in narrower form inside Canada’s payment system. The gain is not prestige. It is more control over routing, customer flow, timing, and cost.
  • Tether’s GEL₮ project with Georgia pushes the pressure further. Stablecoins are moving into remittances, digital payments, and state backed financial infrastructure discussions. That changes the settlement conversation. It is no longer limited to bank transfers and card rails.

Canada already allows some narrower access models through Interac participation and registered payment frameworks. The next pressure point may come from real time payments, stablecoin reserve treatment, tokenized settlement, or cross border payment competition from outside Canada.

The firms to watch are not necessarily the biggest fintechs. The advantage may go to companies that can prove resilience, compliance depth, operational uptime, fraud controls, and trusted movement of funds at scale. Regulators appear more willing to test narrower infrastructure access when the activity is tightly defined and operationally mature.

Strategic Takeaway
Limited direct settlement access is becoming a middle layer between sponsor bank dependence and full banking status. That could reshape who controls payment flow, customer relationships, settlement logic, and financial infrastructure over the next few years.

Market And Policy Evidence

Click each item to expand

1. Fed Proposes Limited Payment Accounts For Eligible Firms (May 2026, United States) ⓘ

The Fed proposal separates limited payment access from full banking status. It gives regulators a way to test settlement and reserve functions without granting the full benefits of a Master Account.

  • The proposal would create Payment Accounts without intraday credit, discount window access, interest on balances, or full Master Account privileges.
  • The Fed identifies use cases including stablecoin reserves, tokenized securities settlement, pay by bank checkout, B2B transfers, instant wages, refunds, and cross border dollar settlement.
  • The model would keep liquidity support and full banking privileges outside the non bank account structure.
2. Neo Gets Direct Access To Interac e-Transfer (Apr 2026, Canada) ⓘ

Neo’s Interac access gives the Canadian market a practical proof point. Direct rail participation can improve control over payment flow without turning a fintech into a full bank.

  • Neo gained direct access to Interac e-Transfer inside Canada’s payment infrastructure.
  • The access gives Neo more control over routing, customer experience, and payment operations.
  • The development shows sponsor bank dependence is not the only possible model for qualified fintechs.
3. Tether And Georgia Plan National Lari Stablecoin (May 2026, Georgia) ⓘ

The Georgia stablecoin plan shows why this question is moving beyond traditional payment rails. Stablecoins can connect payments, remittances, programmable finance, and national digital infrastructure.

  • Tether announced plans for GEL₮, a stablecoin representing the Georgian lari, with government support.
  • The initiative targets remittances, digital payments, fintech development, and programmable financial infrastructure.
  • The project adds pressure to define how non bank money infrastructure should access settlement and reserve layers.

Do you agree the evidence is strengthening?

Explore Trending Questions


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Novisto Raises USD $27M For Audit Ready ESG

May 27, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Risk Compliance And Regtech, Banking And Credit Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence And Data

AI Image – ESG, Sustainability Reporting

Novisto Raises Capital As ESG Claims Need Proof

On May 20, 2025, Montreal based Novisto announced a USD $27M Series C round led by Inovia Capital, with White Star Capital, SCOR Ventures, and Sagard participating. Novisto says the financing brings its total funding to more than USD $55M. The money comes as ESG reporting moves away from wide sustainability claims and into data controls, audit trails, and disclosure risk.

Green Claims Need Proof

On April 23, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators paused mandatory climate and diversity disclosure rules, but greenwashing risk remains high Issuers gained more time on reporting. Unsupported environmental claims still carry legal and reputational risk.

The Competition Bureau’s environmental claims guidance expects businesses to back green claims with evidence. NCFA previously wrote about Canada’s updated rules for environmental claims which explains why sustainability language now needs verification records behind it.  Yes, that includes many types of fintech firms, such as ESG data analytics, carbon platforms, and investor communications.

ESG Data Needs Audit Trails

Novisto helps companies turn scattered sustainability data into usable reporting records. That means cleaner source data, clearer approvals, and stronger evidence when claims face review.

Revenue almost tripled since Novisto’s 2023 Series B. Clients also reported a 50% reduction in time spent completing reporting assessments. Enterprise buyers are still spending because ESG data now needs source records, approvals, and proof.

See:  RBC Drops Green Commitment After Law Change

Novisto also points to AI powered ESG data automation and audit readiness. AI can speed up extraction, benchmarking, and disclosure mapping, but bad records still break automated reporting systems. Financial institutions already know this from credit, fraud, risk, and regulatory reporting.

Europe Needs Reporting Systems

Novisto plans to use the financing to expand in Europe. Sanofi used Novisto to produce one of the first 15 CSRD compliant reports released in 2025. Emirates Group is a recent customer, and S&P Global is a distribution partner.

Europe gives Canadian regtech firms a live commercial opening. Large enterprises now need systems that can defend sustainability disclosures under tighter reporting standards for boards, CFOs, auditors, regulators and investors. No more spreadsheet cleanup before every reporting cycle.

For financial institutions, OSFI’s climate risk guideline still expects federally regulated financial institutions to manage climate related risk through governance and disclosure. That keeps climate and sustainability data tied to risk controls, not just communications.

Talking Point

If green claims need proof now, how should Canada balance slower climate disclosure rules with tougher greenwashing enforcement so credible reporting infrastructure wins and weak ESG claims lose market trust?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Quantum Bridge Raises USD $8M For Quantum Security

May 27, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Funding, Risk Compliance And Regtech, Banking And Credit Infrastructure

AI Image – Quantum Bridge Raises USD $8M For Quantum Security

Quantum Bridge Raises Capital For Quantum Safe Networks

On May 20, 2026, Toronto based Quantum Bridge Technologies announced a USD $8M Series A round to expand its quantum safe cybersecurity business for financial institutions, telecom networks, governments, and defence organizations. The University of Toronto spinout says the financing brings its total funding to USD $16M.

Quantum Risk Enters Budget Cycles

Quantum Bridge’s DSKE technology helps organizations create, distribute, and manage symmetric keys across existing networks. The company says customers can add the system across current vendors, security layers, and network environments without replacing core infrastructure.

The timing makes sense given that NIST released its first three post quantum encryption standards in August 2024 and urged system administrators to start moving to the new standards. In Canada, the Cyber Centre’s post quantum migration roadmap gives federal departments a planning model for transitioning non classified IT systems to post quantum cryptography.

Canada Needs Deployment Ready Quantum Firms

Canada has strong, award winning quantum researchers. Buyers need tools they can audit and apply to real networks at scale. Quantum Bridge is actively pitching that to the market directly, and not asking customers to wait for a future quantum event. It's selling a migration solution for institutions that already manage long lived data, critical communications, and regulated infrastructure.

That connects directly to fintech. Payments, digital identity, custody, banking APIs, cloud security, and customer data protection all rely on cryptography. Infrastructure teams are in need of cryptographic agility before regulatory pressure and vendor bottlenecks make upgrades harder.

Funding Follows Infrastructure Demand

The Series A gives Quantum Bridge more room to sell into high trust markets where procurement takes time and credibility counts. The investor group also tells a useful story. The round brings together venture capital, telecom exposure, enterprise technology, and cross border capital. That mix fits a company selling security infrastructure into finance, telecom, government, and defence.

See:  BTQ Updates Quantum Security Commercial Roadmap

Mattia Montagna, Co Founder and CEO, Quantum Bridge Technologies:

“National security can’t wait for perfect conditions. We build quantum-safe systems that work inside real networks today — systems designed to keep protecting sovereign communications as the threat landscape evolves. This funding means we can meet more organizations where they are, and get them protected faster.”

Talking Point

Quantum Bridge’s financing shows where Canadian quantum policy needs to support execution. Canada should help qualified domestic firms prove their systems inside critical sectors before global buyers define the market without us.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Fed Payment Accounts Test Fintech Settlement Access

May 26, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

AI Image – Feds explore limited settlement accounts for eligible firms

The Fed May Separate Settlement Access From Full Banking Powers

The Fed is proposing limited settlement accounts for eligible firms. The bigger question is whether the U.S. gives qualified fintechs a cleaner infrastructure advantage than Canada.

On May 26, 2026, the Federal Reserve published a Federal Register proposal for special purpose Payment Accounts. Legally eligible institutions could use them to clear and settle certain payment activity through Reserve Bank accounts. Comments are due by July 27, 2026 under Docket No. OP-1878.

The proposal isn't open access to the Fed. Payment Accounts would have no intraday credit, no discount window access, no interest on balances, no correspondent activity, and no respondent activity. Closing balances would generally be capped at $1B. The account would support approved payment settlement, not full banking privileges.

Jerome H. Powell, Fed Chair said:

“The proposed payment account would be tailored to support innovation by serving the clearing and settlement needs of certain eligible institutions while also mitigating material risks to the Reserve Banks and payment system.”

Payment Accounts Are Below Master Accounts

A Master Account gives an eligible institution direct access to Reserve Bank balances and Federal Reserve payment services. The proposed Payment Account is narrower in scope. Firms would not borrow from the Fed, earn interest, receive daylight overdrafts, or use the account as a correspondent banking platform.

The Fed is testing whether limited settlement access can exist without full banking access.

Fed Access Has Been Fought For Years

Fintechs, crypto firms, trust companies, and novel chartered institutions have pushed for Fed access because sponsor bank dependence affects cost, timing, liquidity, and settlement certainty. Banks have pushed back because wide access can raise compliance, liquidity, and regulatory arbitrage concerns.

In 2022, the Fed finalized Account Access Guidelines with a tiered review framework. The toughest review applies to institutions that are not federally insured and are not subject to federal prudential supervision at the institution or holding company level.

The 2026 proposal doesn't replace that framework. It creates a tighter account model inside the same access debate.

Stablecoins And Tokenization Need Direct Settlement

The proposal discusses use cases raised by commenters, including stablecoin issuer reserve operations, tokenized securities settlement in central bank money, tokenized assets, pay by bank checkout, B2B transfers, instant wages and refunds, and the U.S. dollar leg of cross border transactions.

See:  Tokenization Starts Looking Like Financial Infrastructure

Those use cases point to the same operating need, clean settlement. Stablecoin issuers need reliable reserve movement. Tokenization platforms need cash settlement closer to central bank money. PSPs need faster payment settlement. Pay by bank providers need lower cost routing. Cross border firms need cleaner dollar leg execution.

What Limited Direct Settlement Means

Today, many fintechs settle payments through sponsor banks. A fintech sends payment instructions, but the actual settlement usually happens through a commercial bank account connected to central bank rails.

Under the Fed proposal, an approved firm could potentially hold limited settlement balances directly at a Reserve Bank for approved payment activity. That could reduce some dependence on sponsor banks for specific flows.

For a stablecoin issuer, that could improve reserve movement and redemption settlement.

For a pay by bank provider, it could streamline payment routing.

For a tokenization platform, it could support settlement closer to central bank money instead of relying entirely on commercial bank ledger movement.

The proposal would not turn fintechs into banks. Firms would not receive deposit insurance, emergency liquidity, or unrestricted Fed access.

U.S. Firms Could Gain An Infrastructure Edge

If eligible U.S. firms gain limited Reserve Bank settlement access while Canadian firms remain more dependent on bank intermediaries, U.S. fintechs could gain an operating edge in payment speed, settlement certainty, reserve movement, and cost control.

See:  Buy Now Pay Later Moves Into Rent And Housing Payments

That edge is important for stablecoins, tokenized securities, pay by bank, B2B payments, cross border transfers, and embedded finance. These markets compete on speed, liquidity use, compliance reliability, and integration cost.

It could also change sponsor bank negotiations. A firm with a credible settlement alternative has more leverage than one with no alternative.

U.S. And Canada Access Comparison

Question U.S. Fed Payment Account Proposal Canada RPAA Registered PSP Canada Payment Rail Participation
Live today? No. Proposal only. Yes Yes
Can hold settlement balances at the central bank? Only if final rules approve it and the firm qualifies. No No by participation alone.
Can settle some payments through a central bank account? Would apply only to approved payment activity. No RTR may allow direct settlement for eligible participants that qualify for Bank of Canada settlement accounts. RPAA registration alone doesn't.
Still needs sponsor banks? Yes, but dependence could fall for approved settlement flows. Yes Yes, in many cases.
Gets full banking powers? No No No
Main benefit Potentially cleaner settlement for stablecoins, tokenized assets, pay by bank, and cross border dollar flows. Legal operation under Bank of Canada supervision. Access to payment rails and network participation.

Canada’s Settlement Access Question

Canada’s retail payments framework brings PSPs into Bank of Canada supervision. The PSP registry under the RPAA confirms registration status, required fees, and national security screening. Registration does not itself provide limited direct settlement access.

Payments Canada says the Real Time Rail will launch in Q4 2026 as Canada’s instant, data rich exchange and clearing and settlement payment system. RTR is expected to broaden access for eligible participants, including PSPs that meet applicable requirements.

Canada has also legislated a fiat backed stablecoin framework, with detailed rules and implementation still being developed. The framework helps define issuer obligations around reserves, redemption, governance, data security, and Bank of Canada oversight. It does not itself provide payment rail access or limited direct settlement access.

See:  Santander Scales Ebury To Control SME Cross Border Payments

The competitive question is not whether Canada should copy the Fed. It's whether Canada can give qualified PSPs, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms a clear access ladder from supervision to rail participation to settlement. If U.S. firms gain a narrow Fed settlement lane while Canadian firms wait for comparable clarity, product speed, treasury efficiency, and sponsor bank leverage may tilt south.

Talking Point

If U.S. firms get limited central bank settlement access, what should Canada let supervised PSPs access once they meet higher standards?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

The Consumer Tech Trends Emerging from Faster-Moving Ecosystems

May 26, 2026

Pexels – Pavel Danilyuk, Woman unboxing a smartphone on a white table, showcasing technology and lifestyle

Phones are aging strangely now. A device can still work perfectly fine for everyday stuff, yet the ecosystem around it keeps changing so quickly that the phone starts feeling behind anyway. One month, it is AI features, then cloud syncing updates, then storage demands, then camera processing upgrades that somehow make older devices feel slower overnight. Modern tech culture no longer waits for hardware to completely fail before pushing consumers toward something newer. The ecosystem itself creates the pressure.

All of this completely changed consumer habits around ownership, especially in countries like Canada. Smartphones used to feel like long-term purchases people held onto without thinking much about resale timing or upgrade windows. Now there is much more attention on value retention, compatibility, software support, and ecosystem access.

Selling iPhones During Faster Upgrade Cycles

The biggest difference now is that upgrades happen before frustration fully sets in. A phone may still handle texting, photos, streaming, and apps normally, yet newer releases quickly introduce features that make older models feel disconnected from where the ecosystem is heading. AI editing tools, battery optimization improvements, smarter search functions, and better cross-device syncing quietly change expectations every year.

You might decide to sell your iPhone as part of a normal tech planning instead of something you’d consider after damaging a device. Canadian consumers often pay attention to resale timing because value drops quickly once a model starts feeling outdated socially or technically. Faster ecosystems trained buyers to think ahead rather than simply waiting for a phone to stop functioning completely.

Trade-In Culture

Trade-in culture removed a lot of hesitation surrounding smartphone upgrades. Older upgrade habits usually involved buying a completely new phone while the previous one sat unused somewhere inside the house afterward. Now the old device immediately becomes part of the financial conversation surrounding the next purchase.

Tech companies leaned heavily into that behaviour because it keeps consumers moving through upgrade cycles faster. Trade-in estimates appear during launch events, checkout pages, carrier promotions, and even software notifications. The process feels smoother because consumers mentally subtract the old device value before fully processing the actual cost of the new phone.

Cross Device Compatibility

Ecosystem compatibility has become one of the biggest reasons consumers stay loyal to certain brands now. The phone itself matters, but the experience surrounding it matters even more. Messages syncing instantly across devices, earbuds switching automatically, photos appearing everywhere immediately, and passwords carrying across platforms quietly shape daily routines much more than people expect.

Once consumers get used to that convenience, switching ecosystems feels surprisingly disruptive. A slightly stronger camera or better hardware feature often matters less than keeping everything connected smoothly without interruptions. Modern tech culture depends heavily on reducing friction, and ecosystem compatibility has become one of the strongest tools companies use to keep consumers upgrading within the same environment repeatedly.

AI-Driven Smartphone Features

AI features accelerated upgrade conversations because they create a different kind of pressure compared to older smartphone trends. The issue is not necessarily that older devices stop working. Instead, newer software experiences increasingly depend on hardware that older phones cannot fully support.

That creates a situation where consumers feel excluded from evolving features before their current phone actually feels unusable. AI photo cleanup, live summaries, contextual assistance, advanced search tools, and smarter automation systems all push the ecosystem forward quickly. Older devices still function for basic tasks, yet they begin missing experiences that newer phones treat as standard.

Refurbished Device Demand

Faster upgrade cycles created huge growth in refurbished tech markets because consumers no longer view slightly older smartphones the same way they once did. A phone released one or two years ago still feels modern enough for most daily routines, especially once prices drop significantly below newer flagship models.

Buying refurbished now feels practical rather than outdated because consumers understand how quickly newer hardware enters resale circulation. Constant upgrade cycles feed the secondary market with devices that still support modern apps, ecosystem syncing, strong cameras, and current software features. Some consumers chase the newest release immediately, while others intentionally stay a generation or two behind because the overall experience still feels smooth enough without paying full launch pricing every single cycle.

Ecosystem Convenience

Modern tech decisions are increasingly built around convenience instead of raw hardware alone. Consumers pay attention to how smoothly devices connect across everyday routines because phones now sit at the center of work, entertainment, payments, navigation, messaging, storage, and smart home systems all at once. Once everything starts syncing properly, small interruptions suddenly feel much more irritating than they used to.

A device that connects cleanly with earbuds, watches, laptops, tablets, cloud systems, and payment apps creates habits people do not want to disrupt later. The smoother the ecosystem feels, the more likely consumers are to stay loyal to it during future upgrades. Convenience also supports remote workers, especially through IoT.

Digital Storage Demands

Storage pressure became one of the biggest reasons phones start feeling old faster than expected. Photos are larger, videos take up more space, apps hold heavier data, and cloud backups constantly run in the background. Even casual smartphone use now creates massive amounts of digital clutter compared to a few years ago.

That gradual buildup changes the experience of using older devices. Phones start struggling with available space, background processing slows down, and consumers become more aware of performance limitations tied to storage demands. Social media habits, mobile editing apps, streaming downloads, and constant photo capture all accelerated the problem. Faster-moving ecosystems pushed digital consumption upward so aggressively that many devices start feeling cramped long before the hardware itself fully ages.

Older Device Performance Expectations

Software evolution changed consumer expectations surrounding older phones completely. Years ago, a device that stayed functional for calls, messaging, and internet browsing felt acceptable for a long time. Modern ecosystems operate differently because updates continuously introduce heavier processing demands, smarter features, larger apps, and more advanced background activity.

As a result, older phones often feel slower much earlier, even when the hardware technically still works. Consumers notice delays more quickly because newer devices constantly raise expectations surrounding speed, responsiveness, camera processing, and multitasking performance. The gap between “working” and “feeling current” keeps shrinking, which pushes upgrade conversations earlier than before.

Secondary Tech Markets

Secondary tech markets became much more active because faster ecosystems create a constant flow of relatively modern devices entering resale circulation. Consumers upgrading frequently leave behind phones that still feel perfectly usable for someone else, especially once prices drop below flagship launch levels.

Buyers increasingly treat secondary markets as practical ways to access newer ecosystems without paying premium prices immediately. At the same time, sellers recover value from devices before depreciation becomes too steep. Faster upgrade cycles basically created an entire parallel market where devices continue moving between users instead of disappearing once the original owner upgrades.

See:  Deal Flow Without Dead Zones: The eSIM Playbook for Canada’s Fintech Leaders

Faster-moving tech ecosystems completely changed the way consumers think about smartphones, upgrades, ownership, and resale value. Devices now function as constantly evolving parts of larger ecosystems tied to software, cloud systems, AI tools, connected devices, and daily routines that keep changing year after year.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

3iQ Picks Anchorage For Canadian Crypto Fund Custody

May 25, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

AI Image – Crypto custody infrastructure

Canadian Crypto Fund Infrastructure Faces A Harder Test

On May 20, 2026, 3iQ selected Anchorage Digital as the infrastructure and custody partner for its Canadian product suite. Subject to regulatory approvals and required prospectus or offering document amendments, 3iQ intends to migrate a significant portion of assets under management across six TSX listed exchange traded products to Anchorage Digital.

Canadian Crypto Competition Plays Out In Real Time

3iQ is a Canadian digital asset investment manager with a regulated public product suite. Anchorage Digital became the first OCC approved national crypto bank in the U.S. Canada has qualified digital asset custodians, but not an equivalent national crypto bank structure at Anchorage’s scale. The decision puts a hard question in front of Canada’s digital asset sector. Can Canadian infrastructure win large institutional mandates when issuers need custody, settlement, staking support, and regulatory comfort at scale?

The warning is now showing up in market activity. Canada has already debated whether domestic digital asset infrastructure can compete with larger U.S. regulated platforms. That issue became more visible when Balance applied for a Canadian special purpose trust structure to build institutional digital asset custody capacity at home.

See:  US Trust Charter Debate Heats Up Around Crypto Banks

If Canada approves digital asset products but doesn't build trusted infrastructure at home, more of the work, jobs, and revenue may migrate south. In this case, 3iQ keeps the Canadian listed products while Anchorage Digital captures more of the custody and infrastructure work behind them.

That choice is commercial, not patriotic. Large issuers choose the stack that lowers operating risk and helps them launch better products. That’s the reality test Canadian infrastructure providers now face.

Custody Now Drives Crypto Product Design

3iQ says Anchorage Digital lets funds settle trades from cold storage without relying on hot wallets. Its Atlas network also lets 3iQ settle directly with trading counterparties and remove extra wallet steps. It means custody now affects much more than safekeeping. It affects how funds trade, settle, manage risk, support staking, and protect investors.

The partnership is also expected to support 3iQ’s expanded staking capabilities. That raises the stakes. Staking needs more than token custody. It needs validator access, clean reporting, strong controls, and regulatory comfort. The right custody partner can give a fund more room to build. The wrong one can hold it back.

Canada’s Digital Asset Stack Needs Depth

Tommaso Mancuso, President and CIO of 3iQ:

"3iQ needs infrastructure providers that meet “the highest standards for security, flexibility, and regulatory alignment.”

See:  Bank Of Canada Maps Global Crypto Flow Patterns

That is the standard Canadian infrastructure has to meet now. Canada has digital asset talent, regulated products, custody ambition, and a real institutional market. But the operating stack behind those products still needs more depth, if they want to compete. Fund issuers need platforms that can handle scale, connect cleanly to trading counterparties, support approved product features, and satisfy regulators without adding friction.

Talking Point

Canadian policymakers should treat this as a competitiveness warning. Product approvals aren't enough if the custody, settlement, staking, and fund operations work scales outside Canada. The goal should be to keep more trusted digital asset infrastructure, jobs, and revenue at home.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

AI Data Centres Test B.C.’s Clean Power Limits

May 25, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Capital Markets And Funding

AI Image – AI Data Centres Test B.C.’s Clean Power Limits

Power Access Becomes Canada’s AI Compute Bottleneck

On May 23, 2026, hundreds marched in downtown Vancouver against proposed AI data centres, concerned about electricity use, water use, and environmental impact. The protest puts Canada’s AI compute plans under pressure. Communities want to know who gets clean power, what they get back, and whether data centre operators can earn public trust.

See:  Ottawa Funds 44 Canadian AI Compute Projects

The pressure comes from specific projects. On May 11, 2026, TELUS and the federal government announced work on a proposed Sovereign AI Factory cluster in B.C. that would expand TELUS’s Kamloops data centre and add two Vancouver facilities with Westbank and partners. TELUS says the cluster starts with 85 MW of clean renewable power secured from BC Hydro and is designed to scale to more than 60,000 GPUs and 150 MW by 2032.

TELUS Defends Its AI Data Centre Plan

After the May 23 protest, TELUS told Daily Hive that its proposed AI infrastructure is a “critical national asset” built for Canada and by Canadians. They said the project could add $9 billion to Canada’s economy, protect sensitive Canadian data, use 98% clean renewable electricity from BC Hydro, cut energy use by 80%, reduce water use by 90%, and save an estimated 300 million litres of water each year through closed loop liquid cooling.

TELUS is framing the project as sovereign AI infrastructure with climate and data benefits. Critics are asking whether those claims will be visible, measurable, and credible enough for communities that are being asked to host large AI facilities.

Ottawa wants more domestic AI compute so Canadian researchers, companies, and public institutions don't have to rely solely on foreign infrastructure. From January 15 to February 15, 2026, the federal government accepted proposals from companies and consortia seeking support to build large scale sovereign AI data centres. The federal government also said no funding has yet been committed or distributed under the process.

B.C. Is Rationing AI Power Access

On January 30, 2026, the Province and BC Hydro launched a competitive electricity process for AI and data centre projects. The goal is to manage rising demand and prioritize projects with stronger economic, community, and environmental benefits.

See:  Goldman Sachs Buys Québec AI Compute Platform QScale

BC Hydro’s 2026 call shows the cap constraint. Its Q&A says up to 300 MW has been allocated to storage data centres and up to 100 MW to conventional data centres. Each project site request must not exceed 145 MW. TELUS’s stated 150 MW 2032 target shows how quickly one AI project can approach the size of the current allocation.

BC Hydro says it doesn't comment on specific customer load requests. That leaves communities with headline numbers and proposed locations, but not always the full project picture on grid upgrades, water use, tax benefits, jobs, or local access to compute.

AI Compute Needs Community Consent

Data centres turn AI from software policy into physical infrastructure. They need land, power, cooling, permits, grid planning, and local acceptance.

Households, industry, electrification, and AI projects are all competing for clean power, which is scare ad valuable. If communities don't see clear local benefits, approvals will get harder.

See:  Will Nuclear Fuel the Data-Driven Future?

Critics point to electricity demand, water use, environmental impact, and the risk that public infrastructure supports private AI capacity without enough community return.

B.C. is already choosing which projects get access to limited clean power. Canada needs compute, but scarce electricity should go first to projects that use power efficiently, protect data sovereignty, create local benefits, and make capacity available to Canadian users.

Talking Point

Canada wants sovereign AI compute. Can governments and operators prove that clean power used for AI will create enough local benefit, public trust, and Canadian owned value to justify the buildout?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter