Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Jan 30, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Funding and Ecosystem

On January 26 2026, Y Combinator updated its standard deal terms to limit eligible investment jurisdictions to the United States, Cayman Islands, and Singapore. Canada no longer appears as a jurisdiction where YC will invest directly under its standard structure.
The financial terms remain unchanged. YC continues to offer $500,000 per company, split between $125,000 for a fixed 7% equity stake and $375,000 on an uncapped MFN SAFE. YC also states it can assist founders with incorporation if they have not yet formed a company.
The practical impact for Canada based founders is immediate. Teams can still apply to YC, but a Canadian incorporated startup must now establish a parent company in one of the eligible jurisdictions before YC completes the investment. That moves incorporation decisions forward in the startup lifecycle, often before product market fit or initial customer traction.
This matters because corporate structure is not a paperwork detail. It affects ownership control, intellectual property placement, option plans, investor rights, tax exposure, and the mechanics of future fundraising. What was once handled after a seed round now sits directly on the path to accelerator participation.
YC’s decision also highlights how early stage capital increasingly flows through standardized structures. Accelerators and seed funds optimize for speed and repeatability. When jurisdiction narrows, founders adapt by default, even if their teams, customers, and operations remain Canadian.
When access to top accelerators depends on jurisdiction first and execution second, how early should founders be forced to trade structural flexibility for capital velocity?
This is not a withdrawal from Canadian talent. It is a capital routing decision. But when global accelerators set the defaults, those defaults shape where companies incorporate, where value accrues, and how national ecosystems compete for long term upside.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Jan 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Capital and Funding

Image: Freepik AI
On January 27 2026, CVCA and the Government of Canada’s Trade Commissioner Service released the 2026 edition of The 50, an annual guide that presents Canada’s venture capital market to international investors, strategic partners, and market participants.
The release makes two practical points that matter for founders and fund managers. First, The 50 does not rank firms. It profiles venture managers across sectors including software, applied artificial intelligence, life sciences, and advanced technologies. Second, it is built to travel. CVCA says the guide supports engagement through the Trade Commissioner Service global network spanning more than 160 cities worldwide.
That distribution detail is the real asset. Canadian venture often struggles with visibility outside the usual circles. A guide that is designed for outbound use changes how conversations start with foreign limited partners, corporate partners, and co investors. It also helps founders understand which managers actively shape the market today, not just who raised a big fund last cycle.
Brenda Hogan, Chief Investment Officer, Venture Ontario, and Chair, The 50 Committee:
“Canada’s venture market is defined by managers who combine discipline with the ability to support companies as they scale across markets. The firms included here reflect that reality. They are backing businesses that operate globally, manage capital carefully, and deliver outcomes investors can underwrite with confidence.”
If you want the working version, CVCA hosts the guide online. You can explore The 50 2026 edition directly.
The timing also ties into deal flow and capital conversations in 2026. CVCA notes that international investors and partners can engage with Canada’s private capital community at Invest Canada ’26, taking place May 26 to 28 2026 in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
If Canada wants more cross border capital and more late stage wins, what changes first, the number of global investor relationships, or the quality of proof points that keep them coming back?
This release is akin to market infrastructure for capital. When more global investors can quickly understand who deploys capital in Canada and how those managers operate, founders get more shots at the right conversations, earlier.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Jan 29, 2026

Сontinuous assessment education is one of the defining features of the Canadian school system and a major reason why its graduates adapt so successfully to university life. Unlike exam-centric models that concentrate performance into a single high-pressure test, Canadian schools evaluate students continuously through coursework, projects, presentations, and teacher feedback. This approach mirrors how learning is measured at universities and helps students build confidence, consistency, and independence long before they begin higher education. Schools such as Toronto Imperial School apply this model within the Ontario Secondary School Diploma (OSSD), giving international learners a structured pathway that aligns closely with university expectations worldwide.
At its core, continuous assessment education shifts the focus from memorization to mastery. Students are encouraged to demonstrate understanding over time, refine their thinking through feedback, and apply knowledge in practical contexts. For families planning international education pathways, this difference matters: universities increasingly look for applicants who can manage complex workloads, communicate clearly, and sustain academic performance across a semester. The Canadian approach develops these qualities by design.
The Canadian school assessment system is built around ongoing evaluation rather than a single end-of-year exam. In OSSD programs, students earn grades through a balanced mix of assignments, quizzes, essays, projects, and presentations. Teachers provide regular feedback, allowing students to improve their work and deepen understanding as the course progresses. This structure encourages responsibility and time management—skills that are essential once students enter university.
Toronto Imperial School follows Ontario’s standards to deliver this system online, ensuring that international students experience the same expectations as learners studying in Canada. Coursework is carefully sequenced so students build skills incrementally: researching sources, structuring arguments, collaborating on tasks, and presenting ideas clearly. Because assessment is continuous, students learn to plan ahead and meet multiple deadlines—an everyday reality in higher education.
Although lists are used sparingly, it helps to clarify the types of learning activities commonly assessed:
These components collectively reflect how universities assess students, making the transition smoother and more predictable.
The OSSD assessment model is particularly effective at preparing students for academic life after high school. Universities expect learners to synthesize information, argue positions with evidence, and manage long-term projects. Because the OSSD emphasizes these tasks throughout secondary education, students are not encountering them for the first time at university.
At Toronto Imperial School (https://torontoimperial.com/), continuous assessment is paired with mentorship and academic guidance. Students receive support in organizing workloads, understanding evaluation criteria, and responding constructively to feedback. This combination fosters resilience and self-reflection—qualities that help students adjust to the independence of university study. Rather than relying on last-minute revision for a final exam, students practice sustained effort and iterative improvement, which closely matches university grading practices.
Another advantage is transparency. Continuous assessment provides a detailed academic record that shows progression over time. Admissions teams can see not only final grades but also the rigor of coursework and consistency of performance. This clarity strengthens applications and reassures universities that applicants are prepared for demanding programs.
Continuous assessment education creates a learning environment where progress is measurable, feedback is actionable, and improvement is expected. Graduates accustomed to this system arrive at university ready to engage with complex material, manage competing priorities, and take ownership of their learning. These outcomes are not accidental; they are the result of a deliberate assessment philosophy embedded in Canadian education.
By delivering the OSSD through an online platform aligned with Ontario standards, Toronto Imperial School extends these benefits to international students. Learners can access structured coursework, receive timely feedback, and develop university-ready skills regardless of location. This portability, combined with rigorous assessment, makes the Canadian model especially attractive for families planning global education pathways.
In an era where universities value consistency, critical thinking, and adaptability, continuous assessment stands out as a proven preparation method. It equips students with the habits and competencies they need to thrive beyond high school, turning assessment into a tool for growth rather than a single moment of judgment. For students aiming to succeed in higher education, the Canadian approach offers a clear advantage built on continuous assessment education.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
AI Risks | Jan 28, 2026

Image: Freepik
On January 27, 2026, a landmark trial begins in Los Angeles Superior Court that forces major tech companies to explain how their algorithms work. The defendants include Meta and YouTube, as both TikTok and Snap reached a settlement just before trial, leaving Meta and YouTube to proceed before a jury.
Hundreds of families, teens, and school districts accuse social media platforms of intentionally designing products that keep young people addicted. The scale is hard to ignore. The coordinated cases include roughly 1,600 plaintiffs, more than 350 families, and about 250 school districts.
The first trial focuses on a 19 year old identified as KGM and is expected to last six to eight weeks. It is the first of about 22 test cases that will guide how thousands of similar lawsuits proceed. A separate federal case involving more than 235 plaintiffs, including attorneys general from nearly three dozen U.S. states, is scheduled to begin in San Francisco in June 2026.
This isn't just a social media story. Courts are no longer looking only at what people post. They are looking 'under the hood' at how systems are built to see if and how algorithms are influencing behaviour at scale.
For years, technology companies leaned on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, passed in 1996 to avoid liability tied to online activity. That protection still exists for user generated content. What changes here is the focus. Judges are allowing these cases to proceed because the claims target design choices.
Plaintiffs argue that features like infinite scroll, video autoplay, notifications, and recommendation systems encourage compulsive use. In a November 2025 ruling, the judge ruled that jurors must examine platform design choices rather than focusing only on user generated content.
That opens the door to evidence most companies prefer to keep internal. Product research, feature testing, internal discussions, and decision making around engagement will now move into public view. The question's are simple and uncomfortable. Why did the system work this way?
The plaintiffs seek more than damages. They also ask the court to order changes to how the platforms operate, which could set safety rules for the whole industry. If courts agree that algorithm design causes harm, the impact reaches far beyond a single verdict.
Executives from the biggest platforms may testify, including leaders from Meta, YouTube, Instagram, and Snap. Plaintiffs openly compare their strategy to tobacco cases from the 1990s, where internal documents and sworn testimony changed how courts and the public viewed addiction.
Recent settlements highlight the pressure cooker. Snap settled shortly before trial in one lead case. TikTok settled hours before jury selection began. Financial terms stay confidential, but the timing confirms risks companies would prefer not to explain in court.
These trials are taking place at a time when algorithms do more than recommend content. They adapt, learn, and optimize constantly. Modern systems adjust in real time based on user behaviour. Reinforcement loops scale instantly.
In January 2026, Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei warns that AI risks are arriving faster than governance can keep up. In a 19,000 word essay called, 'The Adolescence of Technology", he writes:
“Humanity is about to be handed almost unimaginable power, and it is deeply unclear whether our social, political, and technological systems possess the maturity to wield it.”
Courts are now peering into that gap. When rules lag and impact grows, litigation becomes a way to force transparency. Judges and juries start asking questions regulators have not yet answered.
Financial services already run on algorithms. Credit decisions, fraud detection, transaction monitoring, pricing, robo advice, and nudges all rely on systems that influence user behaviour. These lawsuits do not accuse fintechs of wrongdoing, but they can change how accountability works.
If courts see algorithm design as a product choice that predictably affects people, then how those systems are built really matters. Why a system pushes certain outcomes, what it favours, and where it slows users down can end up being questions for a judge or jury, not just a product team.
For founders and institutions, it's about building systems you can explain. Clear design goals, documented tradeoffs, and guardrails reduce exposure and build trust with users, partners, and regulators.
As plaintiffs’ attorney Matthew Bergman puts it, “The fact that a social media company is going to have to stand trial before a jury … is unprecedented.” Courts now ask companies to explain their design decisions in plain language, under oath, and in public. That expectation will not disappear. Innovation keeps moving fast. Accountability now moves with it.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Startups and Talent | Jan 28, 2026

On January 21, 2026, CTV News reported that a fintech startup built in Canada, Internet Backyard, reached an approx. valuation of $35 million in Canada but ended up relocating to the United States. The story drew attention because the venture succeeded here but still chose to leave after proving product market fit.
The founders included a recently graduated international student from Vietnam and her co-founder from Brazil.
The founders built the product in Canada, validated demand, hired talent, and reached scale. After that proof point, they made the decision to move the business south.
The founders cited two main reasons for leaving: access to growth capital and visa limitations. Those challenges aren't unique and reflect structural gaps that continue to impact where ambitious companies choose to grow.
While Canada's become a strong place to attract global founders, students, and early stage builders. The challenge emerges later, when companies move from validation to rapid expansion and require larger capital rounds, senior leadership mobility, and operational certainty. In those moments, founders tend to optimize for speed and certainty rather than geography.
Canada’s venture capital environment continues to constrain companies at the growth stage. According to data cited by RBCx, Canadian venture capital firms raised just over $2 billion in new capital in 2025. That level sits well below longer term averages and reflects a market dominated by a small number of large funds.
The same data shows that emerging fund managers raise only about $249 million of that total. The top five funds account for roughly 83% of all capital raised, concentrating decision making power among a small group of investors. This concentration reduces the number of domestic lead investors capable of supporting large follow on rounds. For founders approaching Series B or later, this structure often results in slower fundraising cycles, fewer competitive term sheets, and increased pressure to secure capital outside Canada.
Fundraising constraints also impact capital allocation. Through the first nine months of 2025, total venture capital investment in Canadian companies reached approximately $4.9 billion across 386 deals, compared with about $8.6 billion invested across all of 2024, based on aggregated industry reporting referenced by RBCx.
The conditions make capital availability less predictable at the exact moment companies need speed and certainty. When companies are ready to scale, relocation is increasingly becoming a rational operational decision based on their confidence in the domestic ecosystem, not a reflection of founder loyalty.
Capital isn't the only factor. Immigration and founder mobility also impact the decision where founders choose to scale.
Canada’s Start Up Visa program aims to attract global entrepreneurs and support company building inside Canada. In practice, the program faces processing delays and capacity strain. The federal government now applies application caps and limits new intake while it works toward program changes expected to take effect in 2026, according to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
For founders already operating a growing company, these conditions create uncertainty. Delays and intake limits complicate executive mobility, cross border hiring, and decisions about where senior leadership can legally and reliably operate.
By comparison, the United States offers more established founder and talent pathways, including O-1 and H-1B visas, that companies can pursue once growth accelerates. For teams making time sensitive scaling decisions, visa predictability can be a competitive advantage. Having said that, the US administration has introduced new fees which could adversely affect the program.
When companies leave after proving traction, Canada loses future job creation, downstream investment, and the chance to build repeat founders who recycle experience and capital into the next generation of startups.
The solution is to close the gap between early success and long term scale (reducing top founder frictions). It requires coordinated progress on growth capital availability, immigration execution, and speed of decision making. Until those pieces align, Canada will continue to function as a strong launch environment but a weaker destination for companies once they reach global scale.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Jan 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Payments and Market Infrastructure

Image: Freepik
On January 27 2026, Payments Canada confirmed the admission of five new payment service provider members, expanding direct access to Canada’s core payments infrastructure. The new members are Wise Payments Canada, Float, KOHO, Paramount Commerce, and Brim Financial.
The update matters because Payments Canada membership is a structural gate into clearing, settlement, and rule participation. In practice, it determines which fintechs can connect more directly to payment rails instead of relying entirely on sponsor banks.
Payments Canada states that its systems clear and settle more than $411B in transactions every business day. Direct participation changes how PSPs manage cost, reliability, product design, and compliance as transaction volumes scale.
The five firms admitted represent different operating models inside the Canadian fintech market.
1. Wise Payments Canada brings cross-border money movement and FX infrastructure.
2. Float focuses on spend management and corporate cards for businesses.
3. KOHO operates in consumer finance with prepaid and budgeting products.
4. Paramount Commerce provides payment processing and orchestration services.
5. Brim Financial combines card issuing with embedded loyalty and digital banking infrastructure.
Membership also arrives during Canada’s ongoing payments reform cycle. PSPs are integrating with the Retail Payment Activities Act supervisory framework while also positioning for broader access to faster payments and data enabled services. Direct participation reduces dependency on intermediaries at the same time regulatory accountability increases.
As more PSPs gain direct access to payment rails, does competition shift toward pricing and features, or toward operational reliability and compliance execution?
The admission of five new PSPs in a single update shows Payments Canada steadily widening the circle of direct participants. The next test is whether this access translates into faster product launches, lower costs, or clearer accountability for end users as Canada’s payments system modernizes.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |