Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
October 23, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Competition And Market Structure, SME Finance And Business Banking

On October 22, 2026, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly launched Canada's C$1.75 billion Venture and Growth Capital Plan. It combines C$1 billion for a new Venture and Growth Capital Catalyst Initiative with C$750 million for early and growth stage investing. Ottawa expects the programs to attract at least C$3.8 billion of private investment, taking the total pool above C$5.5 billion.
Canada may be reaching an important turning point in how it supports venture capital. The plan is more targeted than another funding announcement. It uses public capital to attract institutional investors, broaden the fund manager base and strengthen later stage financing where Canadian companies often rely heavily on foreign capital.
The C$1.75 billion is federal capital, not money already invested in startups. Most of it will move through fund managers that must raise private capital before investing in venture funds or companies. The first C$700 million fund of funds competition is open now, while the largest growth stage stream is still being designed.
The plan has five funding streams.
Founders won't apply directly for most of this money. BDC will manage the federal investments, while selected fund managers raise private capital and invest through venture funds or eligible companies. The structure is meant to increase the amount of private money available across the financing cycle rather than turn C$1.75 billion into startup grants.
The C$700 million fund of funds stream is the first part with final application terms. Applications close January 21, 2027 at noon Pacific. Managers must be raising at least C$150 million, show Canadian venture investment experience and demonstrate institutional backing or a comparable track record.
The C$100 million emerging manager allocation addresses another weakness. In 2025, the five largest Canadian venture funds captured 83% of all capital raised, while emerging managers raised only C$249 million. A separate stream gives newer managers room to build track records without having to clear the C$150 million minimum used for the main fund of funds competition.
The C$675 million later and growth stage stream targets Series B and beyond, where the financing gap becomes more pronounced. Its current design covers growth equity, opportunity funds, continuation vehicles and some innovation focused buyout strategies. It isn't open for applications yet, and ISED and BDC are accepting feedback until November 23, 2026 at 5 p.m. Pacific.
The most consequential part of the plan may be how Ottawa is using public money to improve the economics for private investors. Selected fund of funds managers must raise C$3 of private capital for every C$1 of public capital. A fund receiving C$50 million from Ottawa would therefore need at least C$150 million from private investors.
The fund of funds terms give private investors priority when returns are distributed. Private investors are paid before the government. They first recover their contributed capital and receive enough additional distributions to reach a 7% internal rate of return. Federal capital is then repaid and begins earning its 2% return before remaining profits are distributed under the fund's waterfall. The 7% isn't guaranteed. Private investors still carry venture risk, but they receive better economics than the federal government when a fund performs well enough to return capital and profits.
Federal money is also put to work early. Public and private capital are generally drawn equally until the government's commitment has been used, even though federal capital represents about 25% of a fund meeting the minimum 3 to 1 private match. That can make participation more attractive to institutional investors by delaying some of their capital calls.
The program still keeps a strong Canadian investment requirement. At least 60% of fund investments must go into qualifying Canadian venture funds. Managers can invest up to 30% of a fund directly into companies, but at least 90% of those direct investments must go to Canadian based businesses.
Previous programs show that the model can attract larger pools of capital. Across VCAP and earlier VCCI programs, Ottawa reports C$1.2 billion of federal investment, C$3.7 billion raised by recipient managers and C$6.4 billion invested in Canadian companies by supported funds and other investors.
The proposed C$675 million growth stage stream takes a different approach. Its current design calls for at least C$2 of private capital for every C$1 of federal investment, but public and private investors would receive the same economic terms. That could make sense in a market where the priority is increasing the number of investors able to finance larger Canadian rounds.
The need is visible in the numbers. Canadian VC investment reached C$2.69 billion across 250 deals in the first half of 2026, but 16 financings of C$50 million or more absorbed 59% of all capital. Later stage activity fell to 18 deals, growth stage financing totalled only C$127 million across three deals and foreign investors participated in 56% of later stage rounds.
International capital is an advantage, something Canada should augment, not replace. The weakness appears when Canadian investors aren't able to lead or anchor enough of those larger rounds. More domestic growth capital can give strong companies another option when they are deciding where to raise, who joins the cap table and how much of the next stage of growth remains anchored in Canada.
Private capital is already moving into the gap. RBC recently launched a C$1.4 billion Canadian technology initiative that includes a growth fund for later stage technology companies. Public capital can widen that market by bringing more pension funds, insurers, family offices and fund managers into the same part of the financing cycle.
The emerging manager stream could broaden Canada's venture market as well. In 2025, government backed VCAP and VCCI capital represented 36% of Canadian VC fundraising. The next step is getting more pension funds, insurers, family offices and other private investors to keep investing after public capital has helped funds build a track record.
Exit markets remain a constraint. Canada recorded 18 venture backed exits worth C$716 million in the first half of 2026 and no venture backed IPOs. Funds ultimately need acquisitions, secondary sales or public markets to return money to investors and put that capital back to work.
Canada has an opportunity to use public capital differently this time. The C$1.75 billion plan can bring more institutional investors into venture, give emerging managers room to build credible track records and expand the pool of capital available when Canadian companies reach larger rounds. The turning point comes if it broadens the investor base (not just the amount of capital available), and those investors earn competitive returns and keep allocating capital after the incentives have done their job. That would move Canada closer to a venture market that compounds on its own rather than waiting for the next government program.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 23, 2026 | NCFA Community Opportunities | Women Entrepreneurs, Startup Funding, Business Awards, Canada

On October 23, 2026, Canada's Total Mom Pitch and Business Awards are accepting applications for the 2026–2027 programme, with a November 15 deadline approaching for Canadian mom entrepreneurs looking for funding, business support and national recognition.
The programme, operated by Sinclair Creative Agency under licence from Total Mom Inc., offers a competitive founder pitch with a $50,000 grand prize package alongside national business awards that don't require a live pitch.
NCFA is supporting the initiative as a community partner and encouraging eligible entrepreneurs across its network to explore the opportunities before applications close.
Canada's Total Mom Pitch offers one winning founder a prize package valued at approximately $50,000, consisting of $10,000 in cash and $40,000 in business services, mentorship and strategic support provided by participating sponsors and partners.
The competition selects 100 semi-finalists, who gain access to business education, funding resources, networking and national media opportunities. Five finalists advance to pitch live at the awards gala on February 10, 2027.
The Total Mom Business Awards offer a separate opportunity for entrepreneurs seeking recognition for their businesses and achievements. Applicants select from the available award categories, and no live pitch is required.
Entrepreneurs may apply for the Pitch, the Business Awards or both, subject to the eligibility requirements and separate application fees.
Application deadline: November 15, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. ET
Pitch grand prize: $10,000 cash plus approximately $40,000 in business services and support
Pitch application fee: $35 plus processing fees and applicable taxes
Business Awards application fee: $197 plus processing fees and applicable taxes
Live Pitch Finale: February 10, 2027
Pitch applicants must meet the programme's published eligibility requirements, including being a mom-identifying woman entrepreneur, having annual business sales below $2 million and meeting Canadian residency requirements. Quebec residents aren't eligible for the Pitch. Business Awards categories have their own eligibility criteria.
Founders should review the official programme rules before applying, including eligibility, fees and prize conditions.
Explore the opportunities and apply: Canada's Total Mom Pitch and Business Awards
Access to capital remains important for entrepreneurs, but funding isn't the only constraint on business growth. Experienced advisors, industry connections, market exposure and practical operating support can also make a difference, particularly for founders managing business and family responsibilities.
The Total Mom programme combines financial recognition with opportunities for participating entrepreneurs to build relationships, strengthen business plans and gain exposure beyond their existing networks.
As a community partner, NCFA encourages eligible founders to review the programme and consider applying. With the November 15 deadline approaching, interested entrepreneurs should check the requirements and submit their applications before the closing date.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 23, 2026 | NCFA Community Opportunities | Spain, Europe, International Expansion, Fintech, Investment

On October 29, 2026, the Madrid Investment Forum will bring Canadian founders, business leaders and investors together in Toronto to explore opportunities to establish operations in Spain and expand into European markets.
Organized by the Spanish Chamber of Commerce in Canada in collaboration with the Spain-US Chamber of Commerce and ICEX, with support from DLA Piper, the forum will feature representatives from Invest in Madrid, legal and financial institutions, and Canadian businesses with international experience.
For Canadian fintech and technology companies considering European expansion, the event offers direct access to investment representatives and practical guidance on market entry, regulatory requirements, banking relationships and local partnerships.
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2026
Time: 9:00–11:30 a.m. ET
Location: DLA Piper, 333 Bay Street, Suite 5100, Toronto
Registration: Register for the Madrid Investment Forum
Programme: View the official agenda
Companies considering establishing operations in Spain can also request individual meetings with Invest in Madrid on October 28 or following the October 29 presentations. According to the organizers, confidential support is available at no cost.
The programme runs from 9:00 to 11:30 a.m. and includes investment opportunities, Canada-Spain ties, legal, regulatory, banking and financial considerations and Canadian expansion experience:
The morning concludes with networking and business-to-business meetings, giving participants an opportunity to speak directly with investment and professional services representatives.
Canada and the EU are also pursuing closer economic ties. Following their September 16 meeting, Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen discussed deeper cooperation in artificial intelligence, digital trade, financial services and payments. As part of the broader discussions, von der Leyen has also raised the possibility of Canada becoming an associate member of the EU, although what that arrangement would involve remains undefined.
The discussions build on the broader Canada–EU strategic partnership launched in June 2025. Carney is scheduled to host von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa at the Canada–EU Summit in Montréal on October 29–30, coinciding with the Madrid forum in Toronto.
For Canadian fintech companies, closer economic alignment adds another dimension to international expansion planning. But political commitments don't automatically translate into market access. Licensing, regulatory compliance, banking relationships and local partnerships still determine how companies can operate and compete. The Madrid forum offers an opportunity to explore those practical considerations directly.
For Canadian fintech companies, entering Europe involves more than identifying customers. Licensing, regulatory compliance, banking access, local partnerships and operating costs all influence where and how a business can expand. As Canada and the EU pursue deeper economic and technology cooperation, Canadian businesses have good reason to revisit their international growth strategies. But government alignment alone doesn't establish a viable market. The commercial opportunity still needs to stand on its own.
Is your company exploring expansion into Spain or Europe? Connect with NCFA to express your interest, or register directly through the event information above to learn more about available opportunities and support.
NCFA is sharing this opportunity as a community partner to help connect interested Canadian founders, executives and investors with the organizers and relevant market contacts.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 22, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Regulation And Policy, Competition And Market Structure, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding

On October 21, 2026, the Canadian government published a new federal regulatory competitiveness directive that takes effect December 31, 2026. Federal regulators covered by it will have to assess how proposed rules affect competitiveness, remove $2 of regulatory burden for every $1 they add to business over three years, and review regulations on clearer schedules.
The change puts regulatory costs, competition and investment closer to the centre of federal rule making. It doesn't require weaker financial safeguards. Regulators can still impose rules needed for financial stability, consumer protection, market integrity or other public interests, but they will have to pay more attention to what those rules cost and how they affect market entry.
It's highly important for fintech firms and smaller financial institutions because many compliance costs are fixed. Legal work, compliance staff, reporting systems and technology builds can consume a much larger share of a smaller firm's budget than a major bank's. The value comes from whether regulators measure those costs properly and change requirements that make it unnecessarily expensive to compete.
The directive replaces the 2018 Cabinet Directive on Regulation, but Canada isn't starting from zero. The earlier framework already told regulators to consider competition, innovation, regulatory alignment and the burden on smaller businesses.
The 2026 directive makes several of those expectations more specific. Proposed regulations now require a dedicated competitiveness assessment whose results must be communicated. Significant regulations must be reviewed within five years of taking effect, while other regulations must be reviewed at least once every ten years. Regulators are also told to consider recognized Canadian and international standards and use them where appropriate. New rules should remain workable as technology changes, and businesses should receive clearer guidance on how they can safely introduce new products, services and technologies.
The biggest numerical change is the new $2 for $1 rule. For every $1 of new regulatory burden added to business, the government must remove $2 elsewhere over a three year period. Canada's existing one for one rule is narrower. It focuses mainly on administrative work such as forms, reporting and record keeping and requires an equal administrative cost offset.
The existing regulatory burden policy uses a Standard Cost Model and federal cost calculator. Treasury Board hasn't yet published the detailed guidance for the broader $2 for $1 approach. Until it does, important questions remain about which costs will count, where savings can be found and how exemptions will work. Businesses shouldn't read the new ratio as a promise that their own compliance costs will fall by half. The impact will depend on which costs the government counts and which requirements it actually removes.
The Canadian Federation of Independent Business estimates that businesses across all levels of government spent $51.5 billion on regulatory compliance in 2024. It estimates that about $17.9 billion could be reduced without sacrificing the public interest. The smallest businesses paid more than five times as much per employee as larger firms. Those figures cover the whole economy rather than financial services, but they show why fixed regulatory costs can shape who can afford to compete.
The directive doesn't name financial regulators one by one. Its scope depends on how a rule is made. It directly covers many federal regulations approved by Cabinet, Treasury Board or a federal minister. It doesn't automatically apply to every guideline, supervisory decision or rule issued by another body. So that means many federal financial regulations can fall under the new framework. Department of Finance regulations approved through Cabinet or Treasury Board are covered. Regulations made under the Bank Act and other federal financial laws can also be covered when they go through those federal processes.
OSFI is a federal regulator, but not everything it issues is a federal regulation. The directive can apply to regulations affecting federally regulated banks and insurers, while OSFI guidelines, advisories and supervisory expectations are different. They still shape how institutions operate, but they don't automatically fall under the directive in the same way. OSFI is already giving more weight to growth and competition within its mandate, including through recent changes to how it balances regulation, growth and competition.
The Bank of Canada is also a federal regulator. Federal payments regulations can fall under the directive when they are made through Cabinet, Treasury Board or ministerial processes, while the Bank's own supervisory decisions are separate.
FCAC and FINTRAC also operate under federal laws where Cabinet approved regulations can fall under the directive. Provincial securities regulators don't. CIRO's own rules also sit outside this federal framework. The directive may encourage better coordination, but it doesn't change which regulator has legal authority over each market.
The government is also moving ahead with Bill S-7, the Cutting Red Tape for All Canadians Act. Introduced October 7, it remains at second reading in the Senate. The bill would amend 31 federal laws. The Cabinet directive changes how federal regulations are developed and reviewed. Bill S-7 is still proposed legislation, while the directive is adopted government policy that takes effect December 31.
A competitiveness assessment gives fintech firms, smaller financial institutions and industry groups a clearer place to show what a proposed rule will cost. That can include compliance staff, legal work, technology builds, capital tied up before launch, approval delays and duplicate reporting.
Open banking shows how those costs can affect competition. Finance Canada's proposal estimated C$13.2 billion in benefits over ten years and C$457.7 million in regulatory costs, with hundreds of small businesses expected to participate. The Privacy Commissioner's proposed changes to Canada's open banking rules could add stronger safeguards as well as new requirements. Each requirement should provide enough additional protection to justify what it adds to the cost of entering and competing in the market.
The same issue appears in payments. Registered payment service providers are gaining greater access to Canada's payment infrastructure while operating under the Retail Payment Activities Act. Future payments rules still need to protect customer funds and operational resilience, but regulators will have to consider whether reporting, technical requirements or overlapping controls make participation unnecessarily expensive for smaller firms.
Stablecoins, tokenization and AI in financial services will raise similar questions. The directive doesn't weaken anti money laundering rules, consumer protection or financial stability requirements.
It asks regulators to consider whether the same protection can be achieved at a lower regulatory cost.
A 2026 C.D. Howe Institute review found that 92% of the financial regulatory measures it examined emphasized stability, transparency, market abuse or consumer protection, while 17% addressed efficiency, growth or innovation. It also found limited formal analysis of regulatory costs and benefits. A financial system can protect consumers and remain stable without making it unnecessarily expensive for new firms to compete.
Founders and industry groups can make the new process more useful by bringing numbers to consultations. Staff hours, outside legal bills, technology spending, approval delays and duplicate requirements give regulators something concrete to assess. Companies can also show how many customers or transactions they need before complying with a new requirement becomes commercially viable.
Canadian Chamber of Commerce CEO Candace Laing called for "measurable reductions in red tape." Lower duplicate costs, faster decisions, more viable entrants and rules that remain workable as technology changes will show whether the directive is producing results.
Canada's regulatory problem been the difficulty of seeing when several reasonable requirements combine into a barrier that protects incumbents as much as consumers. Putting a price on regulatory burden could expose those hidden barriers. The bigger opportunity is to make competition part of regulatory design before new costs become embedded and expensive to unwind.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 22, 2026

Customer acquisition is a moving target for fintech companies. A new product may need immediate visibility, while an established one may already attract visitors through search. The questions customers ask can change as the company adds features, enters new markets, or learns which audiences are most likely to convert. A search budget set at launch should be able to change along with the business.
Working with a digital marketing agency that manages both SEO and Google Ads makes those changes easier to spot and act on. The same team can see which paid searches produce qualified prospects, which website pages are gaining organic visibility, and where the next portion of the budget could have the greatest effect. Rather than treating ads and SEO as unrelated expenses, a fintech company can use them as parts of one customer acquisition plan.
Google Ads can help a company reach people searching for a relevant product today. That is useful for a launch, a new service, or a market where the company has little organic visibility. Paid campaigns can also reveal which search terms generate interest and which messages persuade visitors to take the next step.
SEO usually takes longer. A company needs pages that answer customer questions clearly, explain its products, and make its website easy to use. Those pages may gain organic visibility over time, giving prospective customers another way to discover the business. SEO still requires investment in research, content, technical work, and upkeep. Its value is that a useful page can continue attracting relevant visitors between campaign launches.
Neither channel should be expected to do every job. An ad can bring a visitor to a new product page before that page has earned an organic ranking. A well-established guide can introduce people to a problem before they are ready to request a demo. Together, the channels can reach customers at different points in their decision-making process.
A fintech company may begin with an informed guess about the words customers use. Actual search activity can challenge that guess.
Imagine a company offering expense-management software to small businesses. Its team might describe the product as an “expense automation platform,” while potential customers search for “track employee expenses” or “approve staff reimbursements.” Google Ads can help the company test these terms and see whether visitors who use them become qualified leads.
Those findings should inform the website. If a particular question repeatedly brings in the right audience, the company may need a dedicated page that answers it in detail. If visitors respond to a specific benefit in an ad, the landing page should explain that benefit just as clearly. Paid campaigns can therefore do more than generate traffic; they can help a company learn how customers describe their needs.
That learning is particularly valuable when marketing a product that takes time to understand. A prospective customer may need to compare approaches, review features, and discuss the purchase internally before making contact. Useful SEO content can support that process long after the first ad click.
As pages gain organic visibility, the role of paid search may change. Suppose the expense-management company publishes a practical guide to managing employee reimbursements. At first, it uses ads to reach people searching for that topic. Several months later, the guide and a related product page begin attracting relevant organic visitors and generating demo requests.
The company now has a decision to test. It could reduce paid spending on some of those searches and use the available budget to promote a new feature or reach a different audience. It could also keep the ads running if they continue to generate customers the organic results do not capture.
The important point is to make a measured change. A high organic ranking does not prove that an ad is unnecessary. Some people will click an ad even when the same company appears below it in search results. Others may respond to a particular ad message or arrive on a more focused landing page. Cutting spend based on rankings alone could reduce the total number of qualified leads.
A sensible test would adjust the budget gradually, then compare the combined results from paid and organic search. Did the number of qualified demos change? Did acquisition costs improve? Did the company reach customers it might otherwise have missed? Those answers should determine the next move.
Reallocating budget is more useful than simply reducing it. If organic search begins serving one established topic well, paid media can help the company pursue something new.
That might mean testing searches related to a recently released feature. It could mean reaching a new type of business, promoting a page built for a different market, or learning whether a more competitive term can produce customers at an acceptable cost. Ads provide a way to gather evidence while the company develops the content and organic presence needed for a longer-term effort.
The flow can also work in the opposite direction. If an SEO page starts attracting relevant visitors but few of them enquire, the team can test new messages and calls to action through paid campaigns. Results from those tests can guide improvements to the page.
This creates a cycle: ads provide timely feedback, SEO builds on what the company learns, and organic results help the team decide where paid spend is most useful next. The budget follows customer demand and business priorities rather than staying attached to a fixed list of keywords.
A search report can look encouraging while hiding a problem. Ads may generate clicks from people who cannot use the product. A page may rank well for a popular question but attract readers who are unlikely to become customers. For a fintech company, traffic and rankings matter most when they contribute to a worthwhile business result.
Before changing the budget, the team should agree on what a valuable conversion looks like. Depending on the product, that might be a qualified demo request, a completed application, or a new account that meets the company’s customer criteria. It should then track those outcomes across both paid and organic search.
Sales feedback adds another layer. Are the leads asking about the product the company actually offers? Do they serve the market the company can support? Are they ready to take a meaningful next step? Answers to those questions can be more useful than a lower cost per click.
Shared measurement also prevents each channel from claiming success in isolation. If the ads team reports more leads and the SEO team reports more traffic, the business still needs to know whether overall customer acquisition improved. Looking at the full picture makes budget decisions more credible.
Coordinated search marketing depends on what happens after someone clicks. A strong ad cannot compensate for a page that leaves visitors unsure what the product does. Likewise, organic visibility has limited value if the page does not help the right person decide what to do next.
The website should answer the question that brought the visitor there. A search for a specific feature should lead to a page explaining that feature, who it helps, and how it works. A broader educational search may be better served by a guide that explains the issue before introducing the product. Clear navigation can help readers move from learning to comparing and, when they are ready, to making contact.
For fintech companies, clarity is especially important. Customers may be evaluating a service that affects how they handle money or business operations. Marketing copy should explain the offer plainly and accurately. The SEO and ads teams should work from the same product information so that the promise in a search result matches the experience on the page.
A combined strategy does not require constant changes to campaigns. It requires a regular opportunity to ask whether the current allocation still makes sense.
In a monthly review, a company and its marketing team might look at the searches producing qualified customers, the pages gaining organic traction, and the areas where visibility remains weak. They can then choose a small number of changes to test: update a landing page, develop content around a proven customer question, or move part of the paid budget to a new opportunity.
NCFA Canada’s discussion of fintech startup challenges includes the cost of finding customers. That makes disciplined experimentation more valuable than maintaining two separate search plans indefinitely. Each investment should help the company understand where its next customers are coming from and how efficiently it can reach them.
SEO and Google Ads will not always rise or fall together. A new product may need more paid support; an established topic may need less. When both channels are managed against the same customer acquisition goals, a fintech company can respond to those changes deliberately—and put its budget where it has the best evidence of value.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |