Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
October 5, 2026 | Last Updated October 5, 2026 | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime, Fintech And Innovation

On October 5, 2026, Toronto based fintech Snaplii presented Snaplii Cash as a separate wallet for AI agent spending, letting users fund a limited balance instead of giving software access to a bank account or stored card. The payment system itself isn't new today. Snaplii launched its Agent to Merchant payment skill on April 29 and published detailed Muse payment controls on October 1. Today's announcement makes the consumer proposition clearer and adds cashback to the pitch.
Snaplii is making a specific payment choice. The agent gets enough money to complete a purchase without gaining access to the account that funded it. Visa, Stripe and OpenAI are tackling the same problem differently, using restricted credentials or permission tied to a particular transaction.
The current Muse payment setup starts with a Snaplii Cash balance. Canadian users can add money by Interac e Transfer, while U.S. users can use Apple Pay. The user then creates an API key and gives it to Muse. Snaplii says there is no bank login, account link or stored card for the agent to reach.
The user chooses a daily limit of $100, $200, $500 or $1,000. Snaplii enforces that limit outside the agent and says Muse cannot read or raise it. Users can create separate keys for different agents and revoke each one independently. The wallet balance provides another limit because spending stops when the available money runs out.
Spencer Xu, Founder and CEO, Snaplii:
“You wouldn't hand a new assistant your credit card on day one. You'd give them a budget.”
Once access is set up, Muse can shop within the permission the user has already granted. In Snaplii's documented flow, the agent finds the item, prices the order, buys a gift card sized for the purchase and applies it at checkout. The merchant receives an ordinary gift card value, so it doesn't need a separate Snaplii integration for that transaction.
Snaplii reports more than 350,000 users, more than US$100 million in annual app transaction volume and more than 500 partner brands. Its October 5 announcement also cites cashback of 10% at DoorDash, 3% at Uber Eats and up to 15% at selected brands.
The extra separation comes with a bit of friction. Snaplii Cash cannot be withdrawn to a bank account and is used for future gift card purchases. Users therefore have to move money into another balance before an agent can spend it. That limits what the agent can reach, but it also gives the customer another pool of money to manage.
Other payment companies are giving agents controlled spending access without requiring a separate funded wallet. Other payment companies are giving agents controlled spending access without requiring a separate funded wallet. A Canadian card based example is the AI purchase involving Mastercard, Flybits and Rogers Bank. The approaches below put similar limits in different places.
| Approach | How Spending Is Limited | Main Advantage | Main Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snaplii | Separate funded balance plus a user set daily limit | The documented Muse flow keeps the agent away from the user's bank and stored card credentials | The user has to fund and manage another balance |
| Visa Intelligent Commerce | An agent specific token is linked to an existing Visa card and checked against user instructions | The user keeps the existing card relationship while the agent receives a restricted credential | The card remains the funding source, so token and network rules carry more of the control |
| Stripe Link with Muse | The user approves each purchase and Link can issue a single use virtual card when needed | The agent does not receive the underlying payment details and permission stays close to the purchase | The user still approves the transaction total |
| OpenAI delegated payments | A one time payment request sets a maximum amount and expiry | The amount and duration of the payment permission are both limited | The merchant and its payment provider still complete the payment |
Snaplii limits the pool of money the agent can reach. Visa limits the credential it can use. Stripe keeps permission close to the individual purchase. OpenAI limits the payment request by amount and time.
Visa says its system can check payment credential requests against the customer's authenticated instructions and confirm that the merchant authorization matches the request. Stripe's Muse integration is already live for U.S. consumers. At more than one million businesses that accept Link, Muse can use a saved payment method after the consumer approves the transaction. Elsewhere, Link can issue a single use virtual card for the approved purchase.
These controls can restrict how much money an agent reaches. They cannot tell whether it chose the right product, ordered the right quantity or understood the request correctly. An agent can also stay inside its spending limit while reacting badly to misleading content or choosing a merchant the customer would not have picked.
Important limits are stronger when the payment or financial system enforces them outside the AI model. The agent can still make a bad decision inside the permission it has been given. For more on this issue, see financial AI agent control failures.
Snaplii offers 120 day purchase protection for problems including inactive gift cards, incorrect balances and delivery of the wrong brand. Its policy excludes buyer's remorse, several redemption problems, lost cards and merchant insolvency. That isn't the same protection model as a conventional credit card dispute.
AI agents don't need access to all of a customer's money to become useful shoppers. Snaplii puts the spending limit around a separate wallet. Visa, Stripe and OpenAI put more of the control around credentials and individual transactions. The stronger model may be the one that gives agents enough room to act without adding more payment work than the automation removes.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Oct 5, 2026 | Legal, Regulation, FinTech, Crowdfunding, Human Capital

In the early days of a fintech or crowdfunding platform, legal work often falls to a founder, an outside firm on retainer or a part time advisor. That works for a while. Then the company grows, regulators take notice, partners ask harder questions during due diligence, and it becomes clear that legal expertise is no longer a supporting function. It is part of the product.
Hiring the right legal talent at the right time can be the difference between scaling smoothly and stalling under compliance pressure. Here is what Canadian fintech leaders should know.
Fintech companies operate in one of the most heavily regulated corners of the economy. Every new product, market or partnership can trigger obligations around money laundering, privacy, securities or payments.
Investors understand this. Strong legal and compliance leadership signals that a company can grow without costly surprises. Banks and payment partners often expect it before they will sign an agreement. And when something does go wrong, experienced counsel can limit the damage.
The Canadian regulatory landscape explains why legal hiring has become so competitive.
Many fintechs, including money services businesses and some crypto platforms, have reporting and compliance obligations to the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada. These obligations typically include appointing a compliance officer, maintaining a written compliance program and reporting certain transactions. Getting this wrong can lead to significant penalties.
Fintechs handle highly sensitive personal and financial information. In most provinces, private sector privacy is governed by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA), and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada explains how organizations must collect, use and protect that information. Some provinces also have their own private sector privacy laws.
Crowdfunding portals and investment platforms must navigate provincial securities rules, including the national start-up crowdfunding exemptions. Offering documents, investor limits and marketing all require careful legal review.
The Retail Payment Activities Act requires many payment service providers to register with the Bank of Canada and meet operational and fund safeguarding requirements, adding a new layer of compliance work for payments companies.
Not every company needs a full legal department on day one. As companies grow, these roles tend to appear in roughly this order.
A first general counsel usually handles everything from contracts and financing to regulatory strategy. The best early hires are generalists who are comfortable working at startup speed and know when to bring in outside specialists.
A dedicated compliance officer, often with anti-money laundering expertise, becomes essential once regulatory obligations grow. This person builds policies, trains staff and manages relationships with regulators.
As products become more data driven, specialized counsel can manage privacy programs, vendor agreements and cybersecurity requirements.
Growing fintechs sign agreements with banks, processors, software vendors and distribution partners. Counsel who can negotiate these efficiently keeps deals moving.
Lawyers with real fintech experience are in short supply. Fintechs compete with major banks, large law firms and global technology companies for the same people, often with smaller budgets. Candidates also need a rare combination of skills: regulatory knowledge, commercial judgment and comfort with ambiguity.
Startups can compete by offering meaningful equity, broad responsibility and the chance to shape a legal function from the ground up. But they need to find the right candidates first.
A few steps can make the process more effective:
Many companies also find it worthwhile to work with specialists. Experienced legal recruiters like The Heller Group understand the Canadian legal market and can identify candidates with the right regulatory background, including those not actively searching. That can save months on a critical hire.
In fintech and crowdfunding, legal expertise is not overhead. It is infrastructure. The companies that thrive are the ones that treat compliance as part of their product, build legal capacity ahead of regulatory pressure and hire people who can help them grow responsibly. Investing in the right legal bench early is one of the smartest moves a growing platform can make.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 2, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Entrepreneurship And Startups, Education And Talent, Innovation And Economic Development, Venture Funding And Building

On September 29, 2026, Okanagan College expanded its entrepreneurship programs with a Start Up Lab, short Entrepreneur's Toolkit courses and a Rural Entrepreneur and Artisan microcredential. The new options focus on practical business needs such as developing an idea, reaching customers, managing growth and turning a skill into income.
Okanagan College is one part of a much larger Canadian entrepreneurship ecosystem. Founders can now choose from university certificates, college courses, incubators, research commercialization programs, startup accelerators and shorter programs that don't require enrolment in a school.
A founder might learn accounting and business planning in a classroom, spend a semester building a company, work with experienced mentors or pitch for seed funding. Someone turning professional skills into a one person business might prefer a six week program. The useful choice depends less on the school name and more on what the founder needs to accomplish next.
Better prepared entrepreneurs can create value well beyond their own companies. Statistics Canada describes entrepreneurial activity as a driver of innovation, job creation and productivity growth. New businesses also give customers more choice and force established companies to compete. The Bank of Canada links stronger competition with greater efficiency, innovation and faster adoption of technology.
For Canada, producing entrepreneurial talent is only part of the job. Turning talent into productive participation also requires customers, capital, infrastructure and enough opportunity for founders to build here. Entrepreneurship education becomes valuable when people use it to commercialize research, create jobs, challenge incumbents and build businesses that can grow.
Several large universities now connect education directly with building companies. The University of Waterloo says its entrepreneurship ecosystem includes more than 45 programs covering courses, mentoring, funding, commercialization and its Velocity incubator. The University of Toronto operates 13 accelerators across three campuses for students, alumni and researchers.
At UBC, the 16 week Venture Founder program works with students building startups and researchers commercializing discoveries. Participants work on customer discovery, market size, business models, financial skills and go to market plans. Simon Fraser University's Charles Chang Institute offers classroom programs alongside startup mentoring, paid entrepreneurial work terms and an incubator for early businesses.
The University of Calgary separates different types of founders. Its six month Launchpad program is designed around technology ventures, while its eight week Business Playbook helps people develop traditional businesses such as consultancies, services, shops and product companies.
A researcher deciding whether an invention has customers needs different support from someone opening a local service business. A student with an early software idea has different needs again. The range of programs reflects those differences.
The programs below show some of the routes available across Canada. This isn't a ranking or a complete directory. Eligibility, fees and application periods change, so applicants should confirm current requirements directly with each program.
| Organization | Program | Useful for |
|---|---|---|
| Okanagan College | Start Up Lab, Entrepreneur's Toolkit and rural entrepreneurship microcredential | New founders, small business owners and rural entrepreneurs |
| University of British Columbia | Venture Founder | Students and researchers validating a venture or commercializing research |
| Simon Fraser University | Chang Institute programs and incubator | Students and early founders moving from an idea toward customers and investment |
| University of Waterloo | Courses, Velocity, mentoring and commercialization programs | Students and researchers from first exposure through company building |
| University of Toronto | 13 accelerator programs | Students, alumni and researchers across technology, science and social ventures |
| Toronto Metropolitan University | Startup School and Zone Learning | Aspiring and early founders looking for practical startup education |
| Queen's University | Queen's Founders and Innovators Initiative | Founders seeking training, mentoring, workspace and seed funding opportunities |
| University of Alberta | eHUB and Certificate in Innovation and Entrepreneurship | Students combining academic study with mentoring and early venture support |
| University of Calgary | Launchpad, Business Playbook and research programs | Technology founders, traditional businesses and researchers |
| University of Saskatchewan | Certificate in Entrepreneurship | Students and adults seeking a formal entrepreneurship credential |
| McGill University | Dobson startup programs and X-1 Accelerator | Founders moving from early validation toward customers, growth and investment |
| HEC Montréal | La base entrepreneuriale | Founders from startup through commercialization and growth |
| Concordia University | District 3 Innovation Hub | Technology, health and research ventures preparing for customers and financing |
| Dalhousie University | Collide and Lab2Market | Students and researchers validating ideas and commercial opportunities |
| Memorial University | Memorial Centre for Entrepreneurship and Navigate | Students, researchers and community founders seeking coaching and startup support |
| NEXT Canada | NEXT 36, NEXT AI and NEXT Founders | Aspiring founders, AI entrepreneurs and founders building growth companies |
| Venture for Canada | Solopreneurship | People turning skills, services or expertise into an independent business |
| Futurpreneur Canada | Core Startup Program | Entrepreneurs aged 18 to 39 seeking financing, mentoring and business support |
The program that looks most impressive on paper isn't necessarily the one that solves a founder's immediate problem. Someone without an idea may need basic business skills and exposure to entrepreneurship. Someone with an idea needs customer discovery and evidence that people will pay. A company already making sales may get more value from experienced mentors, financing contacts and help entering new markets.
Programs outside universities widen those choices. NEXT Canada divides its offering between students and recent graduates, AI ventures and companies that are further along. Venture for Canada's six week Solopreneurship program costs $499 for its first cohort and focuses on validating an offer, finding customers, setting prices and using AI to help operate a small business. Futurpreneur goes further into execution by combining up to $75,000 in startup loan financing with up to two years of mentoring for eligible entrepreneurs aged 18 to 39.
Training can help a founder reach customers and build a stronger company, but it doesn't remove the financing problem. With Canada's early stage startup funding funnel narrowing, programs that connect founders with customers, investors and operating experience can be more useful than education alone.
Some programs make that connection directly. Queen's participants can pitch for seed funding. Calgary's Launchpad provides eligible teams with project funding and ends with a pitch competition. UBC connects founders with mentors, industry contacts and investors. FrontFundr's Back The Next Canadian Startup Challenge offers another route once a company is ready to raise.
Okanagan College's expansion is useful because it recognizes that entrepreneurship doesn't belong to one type of founder. A rural artisan building a small business, a university researcher commercializing intellectual property and a software founder preparing to raise capital are all entrepreneurs, but they shouldn't be pushed through the same program.
Canada doesn't need more entrepreneurship courses for their own sake. It needs more people able to turn ideas, research and skills into viable businesses. When programs help founders reach customers, compete and grow, the value extends beyond the participant through new jobs, new products, stronger competition and, at scale, higher productivity.
The measure isn't how many programs exist. It's what founders build after taking part.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 1, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Payments And Money Movement, Competition And Market Structure, Regulation And Policy

On October 1, 2026, Payments Canada added six more new members, bringing new admissions since membership eligibility widened one year ago to 22. Twenty of the 22 became eligible because federal changes opened Payments Canada membership to regulated payment service providers, qualifying local credit unions and designated clearing houses.
The latest members are Bounce Pay, FIS Everlink, Nium, Pesa, Remitly and Vancity. This is the first anniversary of a permanent access reform, not the end of an intake period. Eligible organizations can still apply for Payments Canada membership.
Before September 2025, many regulated payment companies and local credit unions were not legally eligible to become Payments Canada members. Federal amendments took effect on September 29, 2025, adding payment service providers supervised under the Retail Payment Activities Act, local credit unions that belong to a central and designated clearing houses. Payments Canada then updated its bylaws and participation rules for the new member categories. Twenty organizations have now joined through eligibility created by those changes.
Payments Canada operates Lynx and the Automated Clearing Settlement System and is building the Real-Time Rail. It had 111 members at the end of 2025, and its systems cleared and settled approximately $103 trillion that year, or more than $411 billion every business day.
Donna Kinoshita, Chief Payments Officer at Payments Canada:
“Welcoming 22 members in our first year under the expanded eligibility framework demonstrates the industry’s strong desire to modernize payments,”
The 22 additions are split between Canadian companies and international payment groups operating in Canada. Fourteen (64%) are Canadian headquartered organizations. Eight (36%) are Canadian member entities connected to groups headquartered outside Canada. Canadian entrants include fintechs, payment companies and four credit unions, while the international group includes Wise, Currencycloud, Ebury, Shaype, Adyen, FIS Everlink, Nium and Remitly.
| New member | Membership announced | Main business | Group headquarters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wise Payments Canada | Jan. 27, 2026 | International payments | London, United Kingdom |
| Float Financial Solutions | Jan. 27, 2026 | Business payments and spend management | Toronto, Canada |
| KOHO Financial | Jan. 27, 2026 | Consumer financial services and payments | Toronto, Canada |
| Paramount Commerce | Jan. 27, 2026 | Bank account payments | Toronto, Canada |
| Brim Financial | Jan. 27, 2026 | Card and payment technology | Toronto, Canada |
| Meridian Credit Union | Mar. 19, 2026 | Credit union | Ontario, Canada |
| DoBusiness.com | Apr. 16, 2026 | Business payment software | Vaughan, Canada |
| Neo Financial | May 5, 2026 | Digital financial services | Calgary, Canada |
| Tru Cooperative Bank | May 13, 2026 | Bank | British Columbia, Canada |
| Currencycloud, a Visa company | 2026 | Cross border payment infrastructure | London, United Kingdom |
| Beem Credit Union | Jun. 3, 2026 | Credit union | British Columbia, Canada |
| Ebury Partners Canada | Jun. 3, 2026 | Cross border payments and foreign exchange | London, United Kingdom |
| Shaype Canada Financial | Jun. 3, 2026 | Payment infrastructure | Sydney, Australia |
| Libro Credit Union | Jun. 3, 2026 | Credit union | London, Canada |
| Newton Crypto | Jun. 3, 2026 | Digital asset trading | Toronto, Canada |
| Adyen Canada | Jul. 14, 2026 | Global payment processing | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Bounce Pay | Oct. 1, 2026 | Consumer and merchant payments | Canada |
| FIS Everlink | Oct. 1, 2026 | Payment infrastructure | Jacksonville, United States |
| Nium Canada | Oct. 1, 2026 | Global payments | Singapore / San Francisco |
| Pesa | Oct. 1, 2026 | Cross border payments | Canada |
| Remitly Canada | Oct. 1, 2026 | International remittances | Seattle, United States |
| Vancity | Oct. 1, 2026 | Credit union | Vancouver, Canada |
The first five payment service providers entered in January, Meridian followed in March, and DoBusiness.com joined in April. By June, Payments Canada membership had widened further to include more credit unions, foreign exchange providers and digital finance companies.
Payments Canada membership doesn't give a company automatic direct access to Lynx, the Automated Clearing Settlement System or the forthcoming Real-Time Rail. Membership allows an organization to apply for participation. Connecting directly still requires the technical, operational, security and settlement arrangements set by each payment system.
The first year shows real uptake. Twenty two organizations have joined Payments Canada since the rules changed, including payment companies and credit unions that previously were not eligible for membership. Having said that, there's not yet enough public evidence to say the reform has lowered payment costs, reduced reliance on intermediaries or produced stronger price competition for businesses and consumers.
The Real-Time Rail participation requirements include system integration, testing, fraud controls and operational readiness, with additional settlement requirements depending on how a participant connects. User acceptance testing is complete and integrated performance testing is underway, while Payments Canada continues to target a late fourth quarter 2026 launch.
The first RTR phase starts with direct exchange participants, with more participants and Interac e-Transfer clearing and settlement expected to follow in stages. Several of the newest members are already looking beyond membership. Bounce Pay says it intends to participate on the RTR, while Pesa, Nium, Remitly and FIS Everlink connect their membership to deeper participation in Canada's payment infrastructure.
Direct participation could give some payment businesses more control over routing, settlement and product design while reducing some intermediary dependencies. Whether those advantages reach customers will depend on which firms connect, how much payment volume they process and whether they can turn infrastructure access into lower costs, faster services or new products.
Twenty of 22 new members became eligible because Ottawa changed the law, and almost two thirds of the first year cohort is Canadian headquartered. The membership reform has therefore changed who can participate in Payments Canada. The Real-Time Rail will show whether that wider participation changes how payments are built, priced and delivered in Canada.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
September 30, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Risk Compliance And Regtech, Cybersecurity And Fraud, Digital Identity And Trust, Payments And Money Movement, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

On September 30, 2026, the C:\>DIR Global ‘Agentic Regulator’ Hackathon announced its 2026 winners and finalist demos after attracting 942 individual builders and 336 team submissions from more than 65 countries. Thirty six teams reached the final prototype round, including 19 from or affiliated with regulatory authorities, with projects covering market manipulation, fraud, agentic payments, smart contracts, AI advice and digital identity.
NCFA supported the inaugural hackathon as an Ecosystem Partner. What makes the results notable is that both regulators and builders spent a week turning emerging questions around autonomous financial systems into working prototypes.
Every finalist submitted code or a working application for assessment. 260 verified regulators and policymakers from more than 80 institutions across 40+ countries then selected the Final 6, which presented their solutions to 18 senior global regulatory leaders at the C:\>DIR Summit in Cambridge.
The primary question propelling the competition was how do regulators supervise software that can act?
1. 🥇 Team Pheonix, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), won first place for its work on market manipulation, agentic herding and financial stability. Its digital twins and trading agents are designed to let authorities "pressure test" proposed regulations in a synthetic securities market before they take effect.
2. 🥈 YU-SAM POWER, University College London, took second place with an agentic framework for assessing smart contract risk and identifying attacks, supporting more consistent enforcement and international collaboration.
3. 🥉 Rwanda Anti-Scam Team, with participants from the National Bank of Rwanda, Bank of Namibia, Proto, FNA, GLEIF and the University of Manchester, placed third with a system that uses agents to report and recover funds lost through fraud and scams in instant payment environments.
4. Team Axiom, from the State Bank of Pakistan, placed fourth with a supervisory intelligence system for agentic payments designed to identify systemic risks including agentic herding.
5. Agent Reliability Profile, from the MLCommons Financial Services Working Group, placed fifth with a standardized, testable reliability label for AI agents. Its central question is straightforward. Can an AI agent be trusted?
6. Probe, from the UK, placed sixth with a regulatory tool that uses an “Adversary” agent posing as realistic customers and a “Judge” agent to run thousands of test conversations against AI advice systems and flag potential regulatory breaches.
The vouch.finance Award went to Legis Labs, whose Agent Passport gives banks a way to check an AI agent's authority before a payment executes. Project Zeus, from the Dominican Republic's securities regulator SIMV, received an Honorary Award for a human governed, multi agent approach to detecting investment scams, engaging suspected scammers and gathering evidence for enforcement.
The six finalists shared recognition from a US$100,000 total prize pool. The Final 6 were also given an opportunity to demonstrate their work at the Singapore FinTech Festival.
The projects tackled different problems, but several requirements kept appearing.
If an AI agent sends money, a financial institution needs to know which agent acted, who authorized it and whether the action stayed within that authority. If multiple trading agents begin behaving alike, supervisors need visibility into whether that behaviour is creating market risk. If an AI adviser gives unsuitable guidance, there needs to be an auditable record of what happened and where human oversight applied.
That helps explain why agent identity, traceability, auditability, human oversight and pre execution controls feature across so many of the finalist projects.
These aren't abstract governance principles once agents start touching payments, markets or regulated advice. They become operating requirements.
The six challenge areas made the same point from different directions:
The commercial question is what happens after the prototype.
Putting these systems into production will require real data, cybersecurity controls, privacy safeguards, legal authority, model governance, procurement and integration with existing supervisory infrastructure. Cross border applications add another layer because an agent may operate across multiple firms, payment systems and jurisdictions.
That's where the opportunity becomes more interesting.
RegTech has traditionally focused on helping financial institutions interpret rules, monitor activity and demonstrate compliance. Agentic supervision creates another market for technology that helps regulators simulate markets, verify AI agents, monitor autonomous activity, test financial advice and investigate fraud.
Canada already has active policy and infrastructure work across AI, payments, digital identity, fraud and financial market oversight. Canadian fintech and RegTech companies working in these areas should be watching which of these prototypes move into pilots, standards or production environments.
NCFA covered the launch of the C:\>DIR Agentic Regulator Hackathon in July. The winners now provide an early view of what builders and regulators chose to build when given a defined supervisory problem, sandbox environments and a week to produce working solutions.
The interesting result isn't simply that regulators used AI at a hackathon. It's what they built.
They built systems to test markets, identify fraud, verify agent authority, monitor payments, assess smart contract risk and scrutinize AI generated advice.
As financial systems add more autonomous actors, the supervisory layer will have to become more capable too.
Agentic finance may require agentic supervision. The C:\>DIR Hackathon has now put some early working examples on the table.
Explore: C:\>DIR Hackathon 2026 winners, presentations and demos
Read: Official C:\>DIR Global Agentic Regulator Hackathon winners announcement
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
September 29, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Venture Funding And Building

On September 28, 2026, Shopify expanded WebMCP checkout support, allowing compatible AI browser agents to read and update eligible checkouts and submit orders after buyer approval. The Ottawa based commerce company now lets software agents move beyond product discovery and cart management into checkout itself, while keeping purchase approval and payment authority under separate controls.
Shopify already exposes product search, store browsing and cart functions to agents. Checkout is an important addition because the software can now move from helping someone shop to executing a real transaction. Can the agent spend on its own? No. Shopify still separates what the agent can do inside checkout from what the customer can authorize and what the payment provider will accept.
Shopify says millions of businesses in more than 175 countries use its commerce infrastructure, which processed US$378 billion in gross merchandise volume in 2025. A Canadian company operating at that scale is now helping define how software agents enter commerce without turning access to checkout into open authority over a customer's money.
WebMCP lets a website expose specific functions directly to a compatible browser agent. Instead of inspecting a page and trying to work out which field or button to use, the agent can see the actions Shopify makes available and the information each action requires. It improves transaction reliability because checkout needs predictable actions and an accurate view of the order, while product discovery can tolerate more browser trial and error.
Shopify first exposed WebMCP tools for storefronts on August 5, 2026, letting agents search products, browse stores, manage carts and take shoppers to checkout. The September release extends that access so the agent can read the current checkout, update supported information and submit the order after the customer approves it. Contact details, fulfillment choices, discounts and some payment information can be changed, while the agent and customer continue working from the same checkout state.
Access isn't universal though. Shopify excludes several flows, including B2B checkout, embedded checkout, draft orders, order edits and payment collection. Standard three page checkout is also excluded unless the customer uses Shop Pay. Merchants do not need to install a separate WebMCP app for eligible sessions, giving Shopify a way to expose agent access through infrastructure merchants already use rather than requiring a new integration for every AI shopping service.
Browser WebMCP also differs from Shopify's server based commerce tools. WebMCP operates inside the shopper's open browser tab, while Checkout MCP lets an agent service interact with checkout from its own server. Both use Shopify's Universal Commerce Protocol checkout model. Shopify is turning parts of checkout into functions software can call directly while retaining control over which functions it exposes.
If an agent can operate checkout, who controls the purchase? Shopify requires the customer to review the current order and total before the agent can submit it. If the amount changes, the agent has to ask again. Permission therefore applies to the transaction the customer sees, not to an open instruction that allows the agent to keep spending.
Shopify also keeps agent identity separate from purchase authority. Web Bot Auth can identify a registered agent, but recognition doesn't provide the software permission to place an order. Payment access is even more narrow. Checkout WebMCP doesn't accept new card details. An eligible saved Shop Pay card can be selected, while other payment methods or authentication steps may return control directly to the customer. Shop Pay login and 3D Secure are examples.
The transaction is controlled by several parties. Shopify decides what the agent can do inside checkout, the customer decides whether the current purchase should proceed, and the payment provider decides whether the credential can be used and whether more authentication is required. That separation between agent identity and financial authorization becomes more important as AI agents evolve from recommending products to initiating real transactions.
In September, Mastercard, Flybits and Rogers Bank demonstrated an AI shopping assistant completing a card purchase after the customer supplied buying instructions and a spending limit. Mastercard Agent Pay operates around the credential, agent identity and instructions attached to the payment. Shopify controls what the agent can do inside merchant checkout.
Are Shopify and Mastercard trying to own the same part of agent commerce? Not really. One controls access to the merchant transaction. The other operates where payment credentials and authorization take over. As AI performs more of the purchase, those separate control points become easier to see.
If shopping assistants become easy to reproduce, more valuable infrastructure may develop around checkout access, agent identity, payment credentials, spending limits, merchant restrictions, fraud controls and records showing who approved what. A founder doesn't need to build another shopping assistant to participate in agent commerce. There are products to build between the assistant and the transaction.
See: Circle Builds USDC Payment Infrastructure for AI Agents
Discovery, checkout, credential use and authentication don't have to belong to one company. Different providers can control each function, which makes the handoffs commercially important. Companies that become difficult to remove from those handoffs may capture value even if consumers rarely recognize their names.
Product discovery may happen inside ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or another agent rather than on a merchant storefront. Does that weaken Shopify's position? It can reduce Shopify's control over the first interaction, but the transaction can still reach Shopify checkout, merchant systems and payment infrastructure. Shopify can remain part of the economic relationship even when another platform owns the conversation that starts the purchase.
Structured agent access also creates another route into checkout without requiring every AI system to interpret the storefront visually. The commercial evidence is still early, but the technical capability now exists. The market still has to prove whether consumers want agents doing enough purchasing to create a significantly different commerce channel and whether merchants see enough value to change how they manage sales, fraud and customer relationships.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |