Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: P2P, Lending, Digital Bonds, BNPL, Private Credit
Finland’s 39% Digital Finance Result Has Lessons For Canada
September 22, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Financial Literacy And Consumer Capability, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Cybersecurity And Fraud, Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization
Finland's Data Exposes Six Gaps Canada Should Measure
On September 16, 2026, the OECD published Finland's digital financial literacy strategy, backed by a survey of 2,061 adults and an comprehensive review of how people bank, borrow, invest, use artificial intelligence, encounter fraud and judge financial information online.
The headline result is uncomfortable for any country with a highly digital financial system. Only 39% of Finnish adults reached the OECD's minimum digital financial literacy benchmark. Finland is hardly a digital laggard. Internet use is nearly universal, most financial products are managed online and Finland performs above the OECD average on comparable digital financial literacy measures. Canada also has extensive financial literacy research and generally performs strongly on international measures, but no directly comparable national digital financial literacy benchmark appears to be published.
Canada starts from a similar position on access. Statistics Canada found that 94% of Canadians used the internet for personal purposes in 2022 and 82% of internet users banked online. The real gap begins after access. Can consumers judge the products, risks and advice they encounter once they are online?
10 Numbers Behind The Digital Finance Gap
| 97% / 95% | of Finnish adults used the internet daily, while 95% of current or payment account holders managed those accounts online. |
| 70/100 vs. 63/100 | was the average general digital literacy score versus the average digital financial literacy score. Only 39% reached the minimum digital financial literacy benchmark. |
| 54/100 | was the digital financial literacy score for adults aged 18 to 29, the lowest of any age group. |
| 46% / 56% | of adults aged 18 to 29 used AI for financial advice at least monthly, while 56% said they needed help using digital financial services. |
| 70% / 43% / 52% | of young adults cited friends or family, influencers and online advertising respectively as sources influencing financial product choices. |
| 32% / 35% vs. 45% | used short term online credit. Among users, 35% reached the digital financial literacy benchmark compared with 45% of non-users. |
| 16% | owned crypto-assets, about four times the OECD comparison rate used in the report. Among owners, 68% cited fun, 51% fear of missing out and 43% making money quickly, while owners performed worse than non-owners on two of three basic crypto knowledge questions. |
| 31% / 38% vs. 21% | of adults encountered at least one online financial scam or fraud in the previous two years. Exposure was 38% among people below the digital financial literacy benchmark versus 21% among those above it, rising to 56% versus 33% among young adults. |
| 41% | rarely or never checked whether an online financial provider was regulated. |
| 68% / 75% / 23% | rejected the view that online financial providers are generally trustworthy, 75% would not let their bank share financial data with other companies for personalized advice, and only 23% recognized that financial providers may use non-financial personal data in credit or insurance decisions. |
Responder percentages are interesting but the cross-section of those responses are more revealing. They show where digital adoption, financial judgment, trust and consumer protection stop moving together.
1. High Digital Use Can Hide Financial Capability Gaps
Finland has already cleared many of the hurdles normally associated with digital inclusion. Internet use is nearly universal, 95% of current or payment account holders manage those accounts online and Finnish adults scored an average 70 out of 100 on the OECD's general digital literacy measure. Yet their average digital financial literacy score fell to 63, and most adults didn't reach the minimum benchmark.
See: Open Banking’s Next Battle Is Decision Intelligence
That difference is important.
Digital literacy measures whether someone can function effectively and safely online. Digital financial literacy adds another layer by requiring consumers to understand financial products, compare alternatives, check providers, protect financial information and make informed decisions about risk. Being good at the first doesn't establish competence in the second.
Canada already recognizes this. The National Financial Literacy Strategy treats digital access and digital literacy as related but separate issues and calls for consumers to develop the skills needed to navigate an increasingly digital financial marketplace.
The Canadian numbers show why access alone isn't enough. Among internet users in 2022, only 54% of people without a high school diploma banked online, compared with 70% of adults aged 65 and older and 73% of people in the lowest income group. Access is high overall, but participation is uneven. Measuring internet or online banking use alone won't show whether Canadians understand the financial decisions they make once they are online.
2. Young Adults Use More AI And Need More Financial Help
The age results overturn an easy assumption about digital finance. Finland's youngest adults are among its most active users of newer technology, yet they recorded the weakest digital financial literacy score. Almost half of 18 to 29 year olds used AI for financial advice at least monthly, while more than half said they needed help with digital financial services.
The information environment is different for this group too. Seventy per cent said recommendations from friends, family or acquaintances influenced financial product choices. Forty three per cent cited influencers and 52% cited online advertising. The issue isn't whether young adults can find financial information. They have more sources competing for their attention than previous generations did.
The OSC's Canadian finfluencer research found that 82% of investors aged 18 to 24 use social media for investment information. In a separate experiment, 38% of participants exposed to promotional investment content bought the promoted asset versus 8% in the control group.
AI now adds a personalized, conversational source that exists beside social media, advertising, financial institutions and licensed advisers. Financial capability for younger Canadians therefore has to include source verification, recognizing promotional content, understanding when regulated advice is required and checking an AI answer before acting on it. Teaching someone how to operate a financial app addresses a different problem.
3. Faster Borrowing And Investing Demand Better Decisions
Digital finance can improve access and lower costs, but it can also shorten the time available to understand a financial commitment.
Finland's short term credit data highlights the problem. Users of online credit products had lower digital financial literacy than non-users and were more likely to report impulsive online purchasing. Only 35% of users reached the minimum literacy benchmark, compared with 45% of non-users.
Crypto shows the same tension from the investment side. Finland's crypto ownership rate was four times the OECD comparison rate used in the report. Participation was particularly high among younger adults, yet owners performed worse than non-owners on two of three basic crypto knowledge questions. The reasons for owning also mixed investing with experimentation, entertainment, fear of missing out and the desire to make money quickly.
Canada has already reached substantial crypto participation. The OSC's 2025 Canadian crypto survey found that 25% of Canadian adults currently owned crypto-assets. Meanwhile, Canada's BNPL market continues to make small amounts of credit available directly inside checkout flows, while credit reporting remains inconsistent across providers and bureaus.
See: Buy Now, Pay Later And Your Credit File In Canada
Canada already requires financial knowledge to be delivered when it's relevant and before a consumer commits. Digital products can do this far more precisely than a classroom or generic information page. Total borrowing cost can appear before a BNPL commitment. An investing app can explain concentration or volatility while an order is being prepared. A crypto platform can surface custody, loss and regulatory information before funds leave the account.
Less friction in the transaction makes that moment more important, not less.
4. Fraud Shows What Capability Gaps Can Cost
Finland's strongest link between literacy and a real financial outcome appears in its fraud data. Adults below the digital financial literacy benchmark were exposed to scams and fraud at almost twice the rate of those above it. Among young adults, exposure reached 56% for people with lower literacy versus 33% among their higher literacy peers.
One behaviour jumps out. Four in ten Finnish adults rarely or never checked whether an online financial provider was regulated before buying a financial product. That's a serious weakness when consumers can discover an investment, lender, crypto platform or purported adviser through a social post, advertisement, search result or AI conversation and transact minutes later.
Canada doesn't need Finnish data to establish that fraud is a major domestic problem. Canadians reported more than $704 million in fraud losses in 2025, according to the federal government's National Anti-Fraud Strategy consultation, and only an estimated 5% to 10% of incidents are reported. Fraudsters are also using AI and operating across financial services, telecom, social media and other channels.
Financial education can improve the odds that someone recognizes a warning sign, but Finland doesn't assign the problem to consumers alone. Its strategy pairs literacy with security controls, clear institutional warnings, consumer protection, reporting processes and coordination among financial firms and public agencies.
See: How Fraud Broke The Old Rules Of Trust And Verification
Canada can apply the same logic by making provider verification much easier. Before sending money, consumers should be able to answer four basic questions quickly: Who operates this service? Is it regulated? What protections apply? Where do I report a problem? Teaching consumers to verify a provider works better when the verification itself isn't difficult.
5. Digital Use Can Rise While Trust Stays Low
Finland also shows why transaction volume doesn't tell us how consumers feel about the financial system underneath it. Digital financial services are deeply embedded in everyday life, yet 68% of adults rejected the statement that online financial providers are generally trustworthy. Three quarters wouldn't allow their bank to share financial information with other companies for personalized financial advice.
At the same time, only 23% correctly recognized that financial providers may use non-financial personal data, including social media information, when making credit or insurance decisions. Consumers can therefore be cautious about data use without fully understanding how data-driven finance works.
That has direct relevance for Canadian consumer-driven banking, AI-powered financial services and future forms of financial data portability. Consent can't do all the work. A customer also needs to understand who receives the information, what can be inferred from it, what decision it may influence and what rights apply afterward.
See: Canada's Open Banking Strategy Starts With Trust
This is where data literacy becomes financial literacy. A useful Canadian strategy should measure whether consumers understand the consequences of sharing financial and non-financial data, rather than treating acceptance of a disclosure screen as evidence of informed participation.
6. Canada Needs A Better Measure Of Digital Financial Capability
FCAC's strategy already calls for digital literacy, trustworthy financial help, behavioural design, stronger consumer protection and just in time information. Its 2026 to 2029 strategic plan is now operating in a market where AI, fraud and new financial products continue to increase the demands placed on consumers.
Finland receives kudos for applying the OECD digital financial literacy framework to a nationally representative survey and using the results to identify where digital financial capability is weakest. The framework combines financial knowledge, behaviour and attitudes into one digital financial literacy score. It also tests whether people understand digital contracts and crypto risk, compare alternatives, check whether providers are regulated, protect their credentials and recognize unsafe online behaviour. That gives policymakers a way to compare groups and connect capability with outcomes such as fraud exposure.
Canada has useful national measures of internet use, online banking, financial resilience, fraud, investment behaviour and digital access, but no current nationally representative benchmark appears to combine these digital financial capabilities and report the share of adults who meet a common minimum standard.
Canada could measure whether a young adult using AI for investing has the same capability as someone using a bank adviser, whether people taking digital credit understand total obligations, whether crypto owners understand loss and custody risk, whether consumers can verify online providers and whether people know what happens to data after they consent to sharing it.
The measures should also follow outcomes. Finland proposes evaluating whether programmes change knowledge and behaviour instead of relying on page views, campaign reach or course participation. Canada could go further by connecting digital financial capability with fraud losses and reporting, debt stress, complaints, switching behaviour and other observable outcomes.
That would also help separate problems that education can address from problems that require better product design, supervision or consumer protection. A consumer shouldn't need expert knowledge to compensate for a confusing interface, hidden cost, weak fraud control or misleading recommendation.
What Canada Should Take From Finland's Results
1. Measure what people can do after they get online. Internet access and online banking tell us who can participate. They don't tell us whether someone can compare products, understand the risk, check a provider or recognize when something looks wrong.
2. Don't mistake digital confidence for financial capability. Younger adults may be highly comfortable with apps, AI, crypto and social media while still needing help judging financial information and risk. Canada's approach to younger consumers should reflect that difference.
3. Give people the right information before they commit. Borrowing costs, investment risk, provider status, data use and complaint rights are most useful while someone is deciding whether to borrow, invest, share data or send money.
See: AI In Canadian Financial Advice And The Governance Standards That Must Be Followed
4. Make it easy to check who you're dealing with. Consumers shouldn't have to search through several regulatory websites to find out whether a lender, investment platform or adviser is legitimate, who regulates it and what protections apply.
5. Tie financial literacy to Canada's fraud response. Knowing that scams exist isn't enough. Canada should measure whether people can recognize a suspicious approach, verify it, stop a payment, report the incident and understand what to do next.
6. Judge financial education by what people understand and do differently. Page views, downloads and campaign reach show whether information was seen. The more useful measures are whether people make better decisions, avoid preventable losses and know where to turn when something goes wrong.
Finland's 39% result isn't evidence that Canada's number would be the same. It is evidence that high digital adoption can conceal weaknesses that adoption data won't reveal. Canada already knows how many people get online and how many bank there, but do they know whether people can make sound financial decisions once they arrive.
Talking Point
Canada can measure how quickly consumers adopt digital finance. Should its next financial literacy strategy also establish how many Canadians have the minimum capability to use it safely?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
Scotiabank Joins US$22B AI Chip Financing
September 18, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Banking And Financial Institutions
Ten Banks Finance Google TPUs and Customer Contracts
On September 16, 2026, a group of ten banks including Scotiabank agreed to provide a US$22 billion AI infrastructure loan to Crux AI, a new U.S. based cloud venture backed by Blackstone and Alphabet. Goldman Sachs, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., Barclays and BNP Paribas are also among the lenders, according to Reuters. The US$22 billion applies to the full lending group rather than Scotiabank individually. Scotiabank's own commitment and economics haven't been disclosed, and the bank didn't comment publicly on the transaction.
The financing will fund purchases of Google's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) specialized processors used to train and run AI models. The debt is backed by the processors and Crux AI customer contracts, giving lenders support from both the hardware and revenue tied to demand for its computing capacity. Both can change quickly as newer processors enter the market and customers reassess how much compute they need.
See: BGC Launches Compute Infrastructure Markets
The lenders are also working to bring additional banks into the loan through syndication, which would spread the exposure across a larger group. Several banks are reportedly providing a separate US$1 billion revolving credit facility, while the main debt could later be refinanced through the investment grade bond market. That would allow more of the financing to move from bank balance sheets to institutional investors.
AI Chips Are Becoming Financeable Infrastructure
Crux AI combines large amounts of equity, debt and specialized hardware in one infrastructure business. When Blackstone and Google announced the venture in May, Blackstone committed an initial US$5 billion in equity. Google is supplying TPUs, software and services, while Crux expects to bring its first 500 MW of capacity online in 2027. Customers will be able to buy data centre capacity, networking, operations and access to Google TPUs without building the facilities or buying large quantities of processors themselves.
The US$22 billion loan shows that banks are willing to finance AI processors against both the equipment and contracted demand for the computing capacity they provide. Expensive chips can therefore support large infrastructure loans when lenders are comfortable with the hardware, customer contracts and expected demand. In June, BGC launched compute infrastructure markets for trading, price discovery and risk management around compute and memory capacity. The Crux deal adds bank credit to a market that is already developing ways to trade and price computing capacity.
The Collateral Comes With Technology Risk
Traditional infrastructure lenders can estimate the useful life and resale value of assets such as buildings, power equipment or transportation fleets. AI processors are harder to value over long periods because a chip can remain technically useful while losing economic value quickly when a newer generation delivers more computing power at a lower operating cost. Customer contracts can reduce that risk because lenders aren't relying on hardware value alone, but those contracts still depend on customer quality, pricing, duration and continued demand for the underlying compute.
See: Goldman Sachs Buys Québec AI Compute Platform QScale
Bringing more banks into the facility spreads the exposure across a larger lending group. If some of the debt is later refinanced in the investment grade bond market, pension funds, insurers and other institutional investors could also gain exposure to AI infrastructure. That would widen the pool of capital available for new data centres and processors while spreading technology and credit risk across more investors.
Scotiabank's participation puts a Canadian bank inside one of the largest reported financings built around AI compute. It does show that global banks are prepared to finance AI hardware and contracted compute demand at a scale once associated with traditional infrastructure projects.
Talking Point
If AI processors and compute contracts can support tens of billions of dollars in bank debt, what happens to that financing model when a new generation of chips changes the value and economics of the collateral before the loans mature?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Visa Links Onchain Credit to Stablecoin Card Settlement
September 8, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Treasury Liquidity And Cash Management
Payment Network Data Becomes Credit Underwriting Evidence
On September 8, 2026, Visa introduced an onchain credit model for stablecoin card programs that combines VisaNet settlement data with financing provided by Credit Coop. Visa isn't the lender. Credit Coop provides stablecoin denominated revolving credit secured by settlement receivables, while authorized Visa settlement records help lenders assess how participating programs are actually performing.
Visa says more than 160 stablecoin card programs are live globally, with payment volume up nearly 200% year over year. Its stablecoin settlement volume recently passed a US$20 billion annualized rate, more than 15 times the prior year. Credit Coop has financed more than US$2.5 billion since 2023 across more than 3,000 borrowing events and 9,000 repayments, with zero defaults reported across participating facilities.
Visa says more than US$694 billion in stablecoin denominated loans have been sent through onchain lending protocols since 2020. The new element is using payment network data to support credit decisions for businesses operating inside the card system.
Why Stablecoin Card Programs Need Credit
Card programs can owe Visa money before they have collected the related funds from cardholders. Large issuers usually finance that timing gap through bank credit lines, warehouse facilities or securitizations. Those structures work well when portfolios are large and lenders have enough operating history to assess them.
Early stablecoin card programs can have a different funding profile. Visa says some need only a few million dollars, draw and repay capital every day and settle through weekends and holidays. At that scale, the fixed cost of arranging a traditional facility can be difficult to justify, while the borrower may not yet have enough history to satisfy an institutional lender.
Visa's financing model uses a revolving Credit Coop facility to fund daily settlement obligations against the receivables generated by the card program. As cardholder payments arrive, those proceeds repay and replenish the line.
That financing need grows with the card programs themselves. Wirex and Crossmint connected wallets, card issuance and stablecoin spending earlier this year, showing how quickly the customer facing infrastructure is becoming easier to assemble. Financing the settlement behind those products is a different problem.
How Visa Turns Settlement Data Into Credit Evidence
The concept is similar to bringing rent payments into a traditional credit file. A recurring payment record that was previously difficult for lenders to use becomes additional evidence about the borrower. Here, the new evidence is payment network data being used to support onchain credit.
With the card program's authorization, Credit Coop receives daily Visa settlement files through a secure data connection. It compares those records with the onchain repayment history when sizing facilities, confirming settlement requirements and monitoring repayment. The borrower is no longer the only source of information about its payment obligations.
See: Are Stablecoins Becoming Payment Infrastructure?
Credit Coop's Spigot smart contract controls how incoming receivables service the facility. Cardholder proceeds flow through the contract, which routes repayment before the remaining funds reach the borrower's operating account. The structure performs a role similar to a controlled bank lockbox, but repayment can occur programmatically.
Visa says stronger data and a longer repayment record have attracted more lenders to the facilities, reducing borrowing costs for participating programs by as much as 30%.
The same data connection can also support funding closer to the actual settlement obligation. Instead of drawing a larger amount in advance and holding unused capital, the daily settlement file can trigger a same day disbursement for the net amount owed to Visa. That reduces the time capital sits idle and ties lender exposure more closely to actual settlement activity.
Rain And Karta Show Where The Model Can Lead
Rain provides the longest operating record disclosed by Visa. The Visa Principal Member has used a Credit Coop revolving facility since August 2023 and settles directly with Visa in USDC. Rain says it tokenized its card receivables, allowing incoming payments to service financing through programmable contracts.
Visa reports that approximately US$2 billion of Rain settlement has been financed through the structure, with more than 2,000 borrowing events and 7,000 repayments. They also report zero defaults and says every settlement obligation under the facility has been funded on time. The underlying program figures were supplied by Credit Coop, so they should be treated as reported operating data rather than independently audited results.
Visa says Karta's U.S. card program used Credit Coop while its operating history was still developing. In June 2026, Karta raised US$140 million, including a US$125 million institutional credit facility from Community Investment Management and a US$15 million Series A led by Galaxy Ventures. Karta reported 10 times growth in 2025 and another four times increase in revenue and payment volume quarter over quarter in Q1 2026.
See: Mastercard Expands Settlement To Stablecoins And Always On Options
The growth gives the model its strongest strategic relevance. Onchain credit can help finance a younger payment program while it builds a verifiable repayment record. Larger institutional facilities can become available later when the portfolio reaches the scale and maturity conventional lenders want. Visa explicitly says this model adds to warehouse lending and securitization rather than replacing them.
Canada already has a direct connection to Visa's stablecoin settlement strategy. In May, Visa Canada and Wealthsimple began testing USDC settlement for certain Visa Canada obligations. There is no public evidence that the Credit Coop financing model is currently available to Canadian programs, but it gives Canadian issuers and payments firms a concrete example of how stablecoin settlement can connect to working capital and credit.
Talking Point
If payment network data can help a young card program prove credit performance before it qualifies for a traditional warehouse facility, onchain credit may become a bridge into institutional finance rather than a separate system.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
APX Launches 5-Year Bitcoin and Ethereum Credit Line
September 4, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Digital Assets, Embedded Finance
Revolving Crypto Credit With 60% LTV and Partial Liquidation
On September 3, 2026, Toronto-based APX Lending launched a five-year crypto-backed line of credit that lets eligible borrowers pledge Bitcoin, Ethereum or both, draw funds, repay them and borrow again. APX says the facility supports borrowing up to 60% loan to value, with annual rates from 10.49% to 11.99% depending on the outstanding balance.
Interest applies only to money actually borrowed, with no charge on unused capacity. APX also says there are no origination, prepayment or liquidation fees. The biggest change from APX's existing fixed-term loans is that borrowers can use the credit line more than once. They can keep approved collateral in place, draw funds when needed, repay them and borrow again.
Three Takeaways
1. Bitcoin and Ethereum Can Support Repeat Borrowing
APX gives the example of C$200,000 of Bitcoin and C$100,000 of Ethereum supporting up to C$180,000 of borrowing at the maximum 60% LTV. Available credit changes with the value of the collateral, so a falling crypto market can reduce borrowing capacity quickly.
The basic idea will be familiar to anyone who has used a securities-backed line or borrowed against property. The difference is the collateral. Bitcoin and Ethereum trade around the clock and can fall sharply in a short period, which makes ongoing collateral management a much bigger part of the borrower experience.
For long-term crypto holders, the attraction is access to cash without selling the underlying asset. That can help with business funding, debt repayment or other liquidity needs, although borrowing costs above 10% mean APX still has to compete with conventional secured credit where borrowers have access to it.
2. APX Sells Only Part of the Collateral at 90% LTV
APX begins warnings when a loan reaches 80% LTV. At 90%, collateral is partially sold until the loan returns to 85% LTV. APX introduced the 90/85 liquidation model in August and says there is no liquidation fee.
A borrower can still lose Bitcoin or Ethereum when prices fall. APX's approach changes how much gets sold once the threshold is reached rather than removing liquidation risk altogether.
Custody is part of the product design as well. The OSC decision granting APX exemptive relief says collateral held under the lending arrangement is not rehypothecated (not reused or lent out to other parties). APX says assets are held in segregated BitGo Trust cold-storage wallets. Client accounts are not protected by CDIC or the Canadian Investor Protection Fund.
3. APX Is Building Lending for Its Own Customers and Other Platforms
The revolving line follows APX's July launch of embedded crypto lending with Netcoins. Eligible Netcoins users can access APX loans through the platform while APX supplies the capital, underwriting, collateral management, compliance and servicing.
APX therefore doesn't have to rely entirely on finding borrowers through its own brand. Exchanges and wealth platforms can potentially add crypto-backed credit without building the lending operation themselves. The new revolving facility has not been announced as a Netcoins product, so the partner channel and the new line should be treated separately for now.
Ontario's securities regulator granted APX time-limited exemptive relief for its crypto-backed lending model, with the decision extending to participating jurisdictions through Canada's passport system. The order covers Bitcoin and Ether collateral and sets conditions around custody, disclosure and account suitability. It is tailored to APX and expressly says the decision should not be treated as precedent for other applicants.
Canada Now Has More Than One Crypto Credit Model
APX is entering a market where other Canadian platforms are experimenting with similar products. Shakepay's Bitcoin-backed credit line, launched in August, gives eligible Canadians another way to borrow against digital assets. Cayman-based Ledn also continues to offer Bitcoin-backed Dollar Loans in most Canadian provinces, although Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan are excluded. APX differs by supporting both Bitcoin and Ethereum and by offering a five-year revolving facility rather than Ledn's standard 12-month Bitcoin-backed loan.
See: Ledn Bitcoin Backed ABS Deal Enters Institutional Markets
One platform can own more of the lending relationship itself; another can plug into a specialist lender such as APX. For exchanges and wealth platforms, embedded credit creates a way to earn more from customers who already hold digital assets without forcing those customers to sell them.
Talking Point
Will crypto holders use Bitcoin-backed credit often enough to make it a mainstream secured lending product?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Buy Now, Pay Later and Your Credit File: What Canada Actually Knows
Sep 3, 2026
Some buy now, pay later activity reaches Canadian credit files. Most routine instalment plans currently do not.
That is the short answer, and the qualifications matter more than the answer does. Whether a buy now, pay later arrangement appears on a credit file in Canada depends on the provider, on which credit bureau is involved, on whether a payment was missed, and on the month in which the question is asked. Payments made on time and payments missed follow different routes. Two people financing identical purchases through different providers may find entirely different records.
What follows sets out what is reported, by whom, to which bureau, and with what effect on a score, then explains why the answer is this unsatisfying. The position described reflects Canadian reporting as of September 2026, and it is moving.
What buy now, pay later actually is
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada describes buy now, pay later plans as arrangements that finance a purchase with credit. Its research characterises the category as covering a wide range of credit arrangements and as generally a type of consumer credit, comparable to instalment lending. That framing is the reason the credit-file question arises at all. The obligation is credit, not merely a payment method.
The agency identifies several distinct payment models sold under the same label: pre-authorized debits, pre-authorized credit card charges, an instalment option applied to an existing credit card, retail credit cards, and financing arranged through a financial institution. The entity behind each model differs. FCAC lists the financial service providers active in this market as including banks, credit unions and caisses populaires, financing companies, and money services businesses such as financial technology firms.
That mix determines oversight. FCAC directs consumers with complaints to different regulators depending on who provided the financing: federally regulated financial institutions must maintain their own complaint-handling processes, while other arrangements fall to provincial and territorial regulators. Oversight therefore follows the provider rather than the product category.
Does BNPL show up on a Canadian credit report?
Credit reporting is furnisher-driven. A bureau can hold only what a provider chooses to send it, and furnishing is voluntary. In the United States, four senators on the Senate Banking Committee wrote to the major credit reporting companies in May 2026, reporting that several American providers had told them they were not sharing this data with credit bureaus.
The Canadian position is documented more thinly. The Canadian Lenders Association, an industry body, described the position in late 2025 as one in which inclusion of this data in credit files is voluntary, variably reported, and inconsistently used in underwriting. The same commentary reported that Equifax in Canada had begun incorporating this data, with TransUnion not far behind. Beginning is the accurate word, and it should not be read as complete.
Missed payments follow a different route from payments made on time. An account referred to a collection agency can reach a credit file through that channel even where the on-time payment record never appeared. FCAC states that once a creditor sends a debt to a collection agency, the credit score will go down. An arrangement invisible while it was being paid can become visible once it is not.
Because the position varies by provider and bureau, the only reliable confirmation is an individual file. You can check your credit score and see what each bureau holds in your name.
Why no single answer exists
Three independent variables produce the inconsistency, and naming them is more durable than listing providers whose practices change.
The first is whether the provider furnishes at all. This is voluntary, and it varies both between providers and by product.
The second is what the receiving bureau does with it. In a 2022 post it has since archived, the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau noted diverging approaches: one credit reporting company implemented a business industry code while letting furnishers supply data in their preferred format, and others planned to hold it in specialty files kept apart from the core files behind traditional reports. That account is American and several years old. Canadian bureau practice is not documented publicly in comparable detail. That gap is part of the answer.
The third is whether the scoring model uses the data. TransUnion Canada stated in a 2024 paper that it was analysing alternative data, including buy now, pay later, without initially affecting its scores. Data can sit on a file while remaining absent from the decision. Presence on a record and effect on a score are separate things, a distinction that governs which financial activity does and does not build a credit file.
The evidence base is thinner than the coverage suggests
The foundational federal research on buy now, pay later in Canada is a pilot study, and the agency says so itself.
FCAC surveyed 1,034 Canadians aged 18 and over. The sub-sample of actual users was 66 people, of whom 20 took part in follow-up interviews. The agency states that most findings are drawn from that sub-sample, that these early findings should not be generalised to Canadians at large, and that unweighted percentages are used throughout. Those are appropriate disclosures on a pilot. The difficulty lies with how often it is cited as settled evidence.
Two details matter. The survey reference period ran from September 2019 to March 2021; the report was published in November 2021. And 44 percent of the users surveyed found the potential effect on their credit score difficult to understand: the confusion this article addresses was documented at the outset. Interview participants described using these plans to bridge a timing gap, wanting to purchase immediately while knowing funds would arrive later.
FCAC identified risks of over-borrowing and over-indebtedness but stopped short of recommending regulation, committing instead to monitor the market, conduct follow-up research, coordinate with provincial and territorial authorities, and provide consumer education. As of September 2026, the agency's published research index lists no further study.
What an assessment cannot observe
Where these obligations are not furnished, or are furnished into files that scoring models do not read, they are absent from any assessment built on bureau data. A household carrying several concurrent instalment plans can present on a credit file as a household carrying none.
The omission runs in both directions. A consumer reviewing their own file may conclude they carry less than they do. And every party that assesses affordability from bureau data, from banks and credit unions to licensed Canadian lenders, works from a record that omits a category of live obligation. TransUnion Canada listed this as a market concern in 2024, noting that limited reporting constrains the ability of other lenders to conduct credit checks and assess affordability.
This is neither new nor specific to one product. Rent, utilities and telecommunications payments are largely unreported in Canada as well. Buy now, pay later is a recent addition to a longer list of obligations that credit files do not capture. The observation concerns what the record contains, not what any party ought to do about it.
What happens next
On 23 June 2025, FICO announced two scoring models, FICO Score 10 BNPL and FICO Score 10 T BNPL, built to incorporate buy now, pay later data. The announcement was framed explicitly around the United States credit ecosystem, and FICO stated the models would initially be offered alongside its existing scores rather than replacing them, leaving adoption to individual lenders. No equivalent Canadian scoring model has been announced.
The Canadian Lenders Association, an industry body representing lenders, has argued that the sector needs a consistent framework so that this data supports credit inclusion rather than working against it. The position is reasonable and worth reporting. It is not a neutral one.
The effect of fuller reporting would run in two directions. For a consumer with a thin file, a furnished record of payments made on time would constitute history where none existed. For a consumer carrying several concurrent plans, the same reporting would make visible an obligation load that had gone unobserved. Which effect applies is a matter of individual circumstance.
An answer that will change
The question a reader arrives with is whether buy now, pay later touches their credit file. The accurate answer is that it depends on the provider, on the bureau, on whether a payment was missed, and on the month in which the question is asked.
See: BNPL Plans Are Starting to Affect Credit in Canada
That is unsatisfying, and it is not a hedge. Furnishing is voluntary and partial. Bureau treatment differs and is not documented publicly in Canada at the level of detail the question deserves. Scoring treatment is a separate matter again. The Canadian federal evidence base remains a pilot study of 66 users describing behaviour from a period that ended in March 2021.
Each of those conditions can change without announcement. This article describes the position as of September 2026. A reader returning to the question in a year should expect a different answer.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
VersaBank Takes Real Time Receivable Funding to U.S.
September 1, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, SME Finance And Business Banking, Digital Banking And BaaS
ECN Capital and VersaBank's First U.S. Real-Time SRP
On September 1, 2026, London, Ontario based VersaBank announced the first U.S. Real-Time SRP implementation with ECN Capital. The system can fund eligible point of sale loans within hours. VersaBank says conventional funding can leave lenders waiting five to 30 days or longer while enough receivables accumulate.
ECN isn't a new customer. It implemented VersaBank's original U.S. Structured Receivable Program in 2025, and another ECN subsidiary joined the program in July with at least US$300 million in expected annual fundings. ECN Capital's Chris Johnson said the original SRP helped the company “grow our business faster” while improving profitability. The September implementation adds the newer real time capability, although VersaBank hasn't disclosed how much volume is flowing through it yet.
The scale is already substantial. VersaBank's total Structured Receivable Program portfolio exceeded C$4.4 billion as of January 31, 2026 after growing at a 33% compound annual rate over five years. U.S. SRP credit assets reached US$604.9 million by the end of the bank's second fiscal quarter of 2026, and VersaBank was targeting at least US$1 billion in additional U.S. SRP fundings during fiscal 2026.
What changes with ECN is speed. A funding model VersaBank has used in Canada for more than 15 years, and recently accelerated with Financeit, is now running in the U.S. with an established finance company.
Three Takeaways
1. Five to 30 Days Can Become Hours
Point of sale lenders need capital to keep making loans. A lender financing home renovations, HVAC systems, equipment or other large purchases may hold new receivables on its own balance sheet or borrow against them through a warehouse facility until the loans can be sold, refinanced or packaged into a securitization. That interval ties up capital and carries a financing cost.
VersaBank's Structured Receivable Program purchases qualifying receivables from finance companies. Real-Time SRP brings that funding closer to the original loan by evaluating and financing eligible individual receivables within hours rather than waiting for a larger pool to accumulate.
The model was first tested through an April Financeit pilot. The pilot finished ahead of schedule, and Financeit became the first partner to use Real-Time SRP at large scale when VersaBank formally launched the program in June. Financeit was approaching C$2 billion in annual loan originations, giving VersaBank a sizeable Canadian lending operation on which to prove the process before taking it into the U.S.
VersaBank describes the system as AI enabled, but its public disclosure supports a more targeted description. The bank says its internal AI technology helps evaluate individual loans underlying SRP receivables. It has not disclosed enough detail to determine exactly how eligibility, credit scoring, fraud checks or other decisions are divided between automation and human oversight.
2. Faster Funding Does Not Replace ABS or Forward Flow
Financeit completed a C$201 million ABS in June while also using VersaBank's real time funding. Those sources of capital can serve different stages of the same lending business. VersaBank can provide funding closer to origination, while securitization can provide longer term institutional capital after loans have accumulated into a larger pool.
Forward flow provides another option. Propel Holdings secured a US$60 million forward flow from Mesirow managed funds for Freshline loans, allowing institutional capital to purchase eligible production as it is originated. Warehouse lenders, forward flow investors, banks, private credit funds and ABS buyers are all competing to fund the period between a lender making a loan and receiving longer term capital.
VersaBank is trying to compress that period. The economic benefit depends on whether the cost of its funding, integration requirements and credit rules are attractive enough to save lenders money or free enough capital to justify adding another funding relationship.
3. VersaBank Is Exporting a Funding Model, Not Just Software
VersaBank has operated versions of its Structured Receivable Program in Canada for more than 15 years. It entered the U.S. point of sale finance market after acquiring a U.S. bank in 2024, giving VersaBank an OCC chartered national banking platform in Minnesota.
VersaBank is doing more than licensing software to ECN. It's using deposits and its own balance sheet to buy qualifying U.S. receivables through a funding model developed in Canada. That lets the bank grow through lending partners without having to build a large consumer lending operation itself.
ECN is now using the faster version in the U.S. VersaBank already had hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. SRP assets, and the wider ECN relationship includes at least US$300 million in expected annual fundings. The real time version gets eligible receivables onto VersaBank's balance sheet sooner.
Faster Funding Only Works if the Economics Hold
Faster funding can help lenders keep more cash available for new loans, but only if VersaBank's price and credit rules beat the alternatives. Lenders already have warehouse lines, forward flow buyers, banks and securitization markets competing for their business, so speed alone won't win the account.
For VersaBank, more U.S. receivables mean more loans and leases earning interest on the bank's balance sheet without VersaBank having to find the borrowers itself. The economics work only if what the bank earns on those assets stays comfortably above its funding costs and credit losses.
Growth can also concentrate risk. A few large partners, weaker loan quality or rising deposit costs could turn faster asset growth into lower returns. ECN is the first U.S. user of the real time version, so the more telling evidence will be whether other lenders adopt it and whether those portfolios perform well as volumes rise.
See: Canada's Private Credit Market
Private credit adds another source of competition for finance companies seeking capital. Canadian institutions already have roughly C$500 billion of private credit exposure, much of it outside Canada, while U.S. private credit funds have become major lenders to businesses and specialty finance companies. VersaBank is entering that competition with a regulated bank balance sheet, a deposit base and a funding system designed to work much closer to loan origination.
Talking Point
Can VersaBank turn a Canadian funding model into a scalable U.S. lending business?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Solifi Acquires Vancouver Fintech Inovatec
September 1, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity + Insight | Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Digital Banking And BaaS, Competition And Market Structure
Vancouver lending software joins a larger private equity backed global finance platform
On September 1, 2026, Solifi acquired Inovatec Systems, a Vancouver company whose cloud software handles digital applications, loan origination and servicing for banks, credit unions, captive finance companies and specialty lenders across North America. Financial terms weren't disclosed. Inovatec brings more than 160 employees and 20 years of lending technology development into a much larger secured finance business.
For Inovatec, the sale provides the scale its founders say customers are demanding. For Solifi, it adds retail automotive, powersports and specialty lending capabilities to a platform already strong in equipment, wholesale, working capital and automotive finance. Canada gets another successful fintech commercialization event, while ownership and future capital decisions now sit with a global company under foreign private equity control.
The transaction arrives in a Canadian market where those outcomes are common. KPMG estimates that nearly half of Canadian acquisition targets across industries are bought by international firms. Canadian companies are active buyers abroad too, completing more than two thirds of their own transactions outside Canada. The question is whether Canada is producing enough companies that can keep scaling into global buyers themselves?
Inovatec Built More Than an Auto Lending System
Vladimir and Danijela Kovacevic founded Inovatec in 2006 with two people. The platform now spans its Propel digital application portal, loan origination software and loan and lease servicing. It supports automotive, powersports, equipment and other consumer and commercial lending, with more than 70 third party integrations across its products.
The software reaches several workflows where lenders spend time and money. Applications can flow from consumers or dealers into credit decisioning and funding, while the servicing system handles payments, collections, customer service and asset recovery. Inovatec says lenders using its AI based funding automation have cut time spent manually reviewing documents by as much as 80%. That's a company reported customer result rather than an industry benchmark, but it shows the type of operating efficiency Solifi is buying.
Inovatec has also kept adding capabilities while expanding in the United States. In August, less than a month before the acquisition, it integrated Fortiro technology to detect altered and AI generated lending documents during origination. The company reports annual SOC 1, SOC 2 and SOC 3 audits along with ISO 27001 and ISO 27018 certifications, requirements that help lending software get through the security reviews of banks and other regulated customers.
The founders described the reason for selling in unusually direct terms. Customers want more products, channels and automation, and “meeting those needs requires scale.” Solifi gives Inovatec access to a much larger product portfolio, implementation organization and international customer base.
Solifi Was Already Buying Its Way Into More Finance
Solifi has dual headquarters in Minneapolis, United States, and Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, and sells software to banks, captive finance companies and independent lenders around the world. When TA Associates became its majority investor in October 2024, Solifi had more than 650 employees globally. Thoma Bravo, which had backed the company since 2019, kept a meaningful investment.
The ownership change came with an explicit acquisition plan. TA and Solifi said they intended to expand into adjacent finance markets and new countries through strategic acquisitions as well as internal growth.
That plan started producing deals. In September 2025, Solifi acquired DataScan, an Atlanta area company whose wholesale finance and inventory risk software serves more than 45 major banks and captive lenders. DataScan added floorplan lending, digital inventory audits and field inspection capabilities.
While DataScan strengthened the wholesale side of automotive finance. Inovatec adds the consumer application, credit, funding and servicing work that happens on the retail side. Solifi can now sell across more of the financing relationship instead of relying on separate products for each part.
That makes the Vancouver acquisition easier to understand. Solifi isn't simply adding another software company. Its private equity owners are funding a deliberate expansion across secured lending, and Inovatec brings technology and customer relationships that would take years to reproduce organically.
Canadian Fintech Is Producing Assets Global Buyers Want
The timing fits Canada's current fintech market. KPMG counted US$996.7 million invested across 47 Canadian fintech deals in the first half of 2026. That was down more than 40% from US$1.7 billion across 82 deals a year earlier, while capital concentrated in companies with established scale, specialized technology and clearer economics.
KPMG partner Dubie Cunningham summarized what is attracting capital as “technology, customers, licences or regulated platforms that can accelerate expansion.” Inovatec fits that description closely. Solifi is buying working lending software, a North American customer base, integrations, regulated industry experience and a team that has spent two decades inside automotive and specialty finance.
Recent Canadian sales highlight various versions of the same commercial pattern. Fiserv bought Toronto based Payfare for C$4 per share, with the final acquisition covering roughly C$193.1 million of outstanding shares. Fiserv wanted Payfare's card program management, white label app and embedded finance capabilities. Payfare's situation included customer concentration and financial pressure before the sale, so it isn't a direct parallel to Inovatec.
Robinhood acquired WonderFi for about C$250 million for a different reason. WonderFi's Bitbuy and Coinsquare platforms brought roughly 300,000 funded customers at closing and regulated Canadian crypto access. Robinhood used the acquisition to enter Canada rather than spending years building that position itself.
European payments company Paynt used its 2025 acquisition of Vancouver based E-xact Transactions to expand in North America. E-xact was processing more than C$3.5 billion annually across 50 million transactions, and Paynt made Vancouver a new operational hub. The transactions differ, but the assets being purchased are software, customers, transaction volume, licences, regulatory experience and local distribution.
Foreign Ownership Is Only Half the Canadian Story
Canada isn't simply selling companies while everyone else buys. KPMG's wider M&A data show Canadian firms conduct more than two thirds of their transactions outside the country. The domestic fintech market is also still financing independent growth. Nesto raised C$302 million in its 2026 Series E at a C$1.47 billion valuation, the largest Canadian fintech financing in KPMG's H1 data.
Selling to a larger company can be a good outcome. Founders and investors get paid, employees may get more resources, and Canadian technology can reach customers that would have been costly to win alone. The bigger concern is when Canada keeps building valuable fintechs but too few grow large enough to become global buyers themselves.
Solifi says customers will keep their existing products and support, and that it will continue investing in Inovatec's products. The founders also say clients will keep working with the same team. What Solifi hasn't said is whether Vancouver headcount will grow, where future product decisions will be made, or where new intellectual property will be developed. There is no evidence today of layoffs, office cuts or development work leaving Canada.
Canada's economic return will depend on more than where the shareholder register ends up. Inovatec found the scale it wanted by joining Solifi. Canada's fintech market becomes stronger when more companies can eventually provide that scale themselves.
Talking Point
How many Canadian fintechs can grow from attractive acquisition targets into global acquirers?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
