Category Archives: Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health

NCFA Weekly Fintech Intelligence Mar 28-Apr 3, 2026

April 3, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Payments And Market Infrastructure, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Regulation And Policy

Image Freepik, Data visualization signals

Image: Freepik

This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors.  This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis.  (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer?  (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026, March 14-20, 2026, March 21-27, 2026).

Weekly Fintech Market Intelligence Mar 28 - Apr 3, 2026

Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure

SEC Sets Options Market Structure Roundtable For April 16

Apr 2, 2026, United States
  • The SEC scheduled a public roundtable on options market structure for Apr 16, 2026 and published the full agenda and panelists.
  • The agenda includes a data presentation from the Division of Trading and Markets Office of Analytics and Research, followed by panels on quote driven competition, customer experience, and growth challenges in listed options.
  • The SEC named participants from exchanges, brokers, market makers, academics, and industry groups, including NYSE, Nasdaq, OCC, Citadel Securities, Interactive Brokers, Robinhood Securities, Schwab, and SIFMA.

The SEC is putting options infrastructure, customer outcomes, and market growth on the table in one public process. That gives exchanges, brokers, market makers, and vendors a clear read on where scrutiny may build next.

FCA And Bank Open Taskforce On Transaction And Post Trade Reporting

Apr 2, 2026, United Kingdom
  • The FCA and Bank of England are seeking members for a new taskforce to shape their long term approach to harmonising transaction and post trade reporting.
  • The taskforce will run through three working groups covering policy, strategy, and architecture.
  • Its scope includes opportunities to harmonise reporting under UK MiFIR, UK EMIR, and UK SFTR, simplify reporting data, and assess how modern technology and data architecture can streamline the reporting stack.
  • Appointments are for an initial 18 month period, with applications due by Apr 23, 2026.

The UK is opening a formal industry track to reduce duplication across major wholesale market reporting regimes. That puts reporting design, data standards, and regtech architecture back into play for firms that want lower operational drag in post trade infrastructure.

TSXV Removes Sponsor Requirement For Listings

Mar 31, 2026, Canada
  • TSX Venture Exchange removed its requirement for a Sponsor, effective immediately.
  • The Exchange removed Policy 2.2, Form 2G, Form 2H, Form 2I, and Appendix 2A from its Corporate Finance Manual.
  • The change removes a longstanding listing process requirement tied to sponsor reports, transaction disclosure forms, and review procedure guidance.

Lower listing friction can help venture issuers reduce cost and timing pressure, but it does not remove the need for disclosure readiness, investor demand, exchange review, governance, and financing fit. Founders, issuers, dealers, advisors, and investors should track whether public venture market access becomes more usable or whether market conditions remain the bigger constraint.

Payments And Money Movement

ECB Sets A Comprehensive Payments Strategy For Europe

Mar 31, 2026, Europe
  • The strategy moves beyond retail and now pulls wholesale, business to business, and cross border payments into one framework.
  • Central bank money stays at the core of wholesale settlement, while tokenized deposits and stablecoins sit alongside it under strict design and regulatory conditions.
  • The digital euro, Pontes, Appia, and cross border work now connect into one direction instead of running as separate tracks.
  • Business payment execution still has gaps, especially where verification of payee isn’t fully embedded in ERP systems and where one mismatch can stall an entire batch.

Europe is locking in how this market runs. Central bank money anchors it. Private players still have room, but they’ll need to fit inside tighter rules and real interoperability. If you’re building for enterprise payments or settlement, this isn’t abstract anymore. You’ll need to design for it now.

Risk Compliance And Regtech

Japan FSA Revises AML And Terror Finance Guidelines

Mar 31, 2026, Japan
  • Japan’s Financial Services Agency revised its AML and combating the financing of terrorism guidelines on Mar 31, 2026.
  • The guidelines make board involvement explicit, requiring AML/CFT to be treated as a strategic issue with governance, reporting, staffing, and resource allocation led from the top.
  • The revision sets operating expectations across enterprise wide risk assessment, customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, outsourcing, data governance, IT systems, and group wide controls.
  • The guidelines also tell firms to examine the use of new technologies, including AI, block chain, and RPA, to improve AML/CFT controls.

Japan is raising the AML/CFT baseline from policy and procedure into board level execution. Banks, brokers, payment firms, and regtech vendors now have a clearer supervisory benchmark for how risk assessment, controls, data, and technology need to work together.

AUSTRAC Finalises AML And Travel Rule Transition Timetable

Mar 30, 2026, Australia
  • AUSTRAC finalised the transitional and amendment rules for Australia’s AML/CTF reforms and said the changes now set practical timeframes for businesses to update systems and processes.
  • The travel rule applies to businesses that transfer or receive money, virtual assets, or property on behalf of customers, including financial institutions, remittance providers, and virtual asset service providers.
  • Reporting entities have a 3 year transition period from Mar 31, 2026 to Mar 30, 2029 to move from current customer identification procedures to the new initial customer due diligence framework.
  • Obligations for new virtual asset services, including travel rule requirements, are deferred until Jul 1, 2026.

Australia has moved AML reform into implementation with fixed dates and operating deadlines. Banks, remitters, VASPs, and regtech vendors now have a live timetable for travel rule compliance, customer due diligence changes, and system updates.

Digital Assets, Blockchain And Tokenization

CSA Opens Project Tokenization With Calgary And Toronto Workshops

Mar 31, 2026, Canada
  • The CSA launched Project Tokenization in the Collaboratory to examine tokenized financial products and how tokenization fits within Canadian securities laws.
  • The first phase covers stakeholder engagement, issue mapping, and targeted research, with later phases that could include a discussion paper or live testing of tokenized instruments and infrastructure.
  • Workshops are scheduled for Apr 9 in Calgary and Jun 11 in Toronto, with an open intake for fintechs, issuers, financial institutions, custodians, marketplaces, and clearing agencies.

Canada now has a regulator run tokenization track with dates, intake, and a possible path to live testing. Builders have a direct way to shape how tokenized securities and market infrastructure are handled before rules harden.

Regulation And Policy

Canada Reopens Financial Services Channel With China

Apr 3, 2026, Canada and China
  • Canada and China agreed to improve two way trade and investment, including in financial services.
  • The visit produced a joint statement launching a Canada China Financial Working Group.
  • Both sides also agreed to hold a high level economic and financial dialogue later in 2026.

Canada is putting financial services back into the trade relationship with China through a formal working channel. That creates a live policy lane for banks, financial institutions, and cross border market access discussions at a time when trade diversification is becoming more urgent.

CFTC Sues Three States Over Prediction Market Jurisdiction

Apr 2, 2026, United States
  • The CFTC filed lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois to challenge state actions against CFTC registered designated contract markets.
  • The agency says Congress gave the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over lawful event contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act.
  • The CFTC expects to move forward with regulation after its recent prediction markets rulemaking notice.

The fight over prediction markets is now moving through both courts and rulemaking. That gives exchanges, brokers, and market operators a clearer read on where federal authority is likely to be enforced next.

OSFI Pins June 2026 Launch For Modernized Approvals Framework

Mar 30, 2026, Canada
  • The remarks confirm a modernized approvals framework scheduled to launch in June 2026 to create efficiencies in how OSFI reviews banking applications.
  • The discussion also references draft CAR revisions that propose lowering the risk weight on some business loans from 85% to 75% for small and medium sized businesses.
  • The remarks tie resilience to growth capacity through calibrated capital treatment when risk weights match underlying exposure risk.

A defined approvals launch date plus explicit capital calibration examples give new entrants and regulated partners a clearer timeline for federal licensing planning and balance sheet capacity conversations.

Consumer Protection And Market Conduct

UK Regulators Form Taskforce On Motor Finance Claims Practices

Mar 30, 2026, United Kingdom
  • The FCA, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Information Commissioner’s Office, and Advertising Standards Authority have formed a joint taskforce focused on poor motor finance claims practices.
  • The taskforce targets claims management companies and law firms involved in misleading conduct, weak data practices, and problematic advertising.

Claims-driven customer acquisition now faces coordinated scrutiny across conduct, privacy, and marketing rules at the same time. Firms that depend on lead generation, claims funnels, or partner-driven acquisition will need tighter controls across the full chain, not just cleaner front-end marketing.

Conclusion

The competitive edge is moving away from pure speed and toward execution inside the rules. This week’s signals show regulators and market operators getting more specific about how reporting works, how tokenized products may enter the market, how approvals work, and how customer facing conduct gets judged. That creates real openings for fintechs that can align product design with compliance, data architecture, and institutional grade operations earlier. It also raises the cost for firms still treating regulation as something to solve after launch.

NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

DeFi Lending Data Exposes Leverage And Liquidation Risks

Apr 3, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

AI Image DeFi Lending Risk Insights

Aave V3 data shows where returns and losses concentrate

On April 2, 2026, a DeFi lending risk analysis using Aave V3 data from the Bank of Canada analyzes transaction data on Ethereum to find a market that works operationally, but depends on narrow revenue pools, heavy overcollateralization, and fast liquidation when collateral prices fall.

The paper focuses on Aave V3 because it is the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked. It cites about $34 billion secured in smart contracts, roughly 25% of all DeFi TVL and about 50% of lending sector TVL. The data analyzed runs from January 27, 2023 to May 6, 2025, which gives the study enough depth to study how the model behaves in live market conditions and not just theory.

Returns Concentrate In A Small Set Of Aave V3 Assets

The earnings base is much narrower than the deposit base. On Aave V3, WETH, USDT, and USDC generate nearly 83% of total protocol earning in the sample. That doesn't mean the same pattern holds across the entire DeFi lending market, but it does show the largest lending protocol still relies heavily on a small set of assets to produce revenue.

See:  Bank of Canada Paper: Fragility of DeFi Lending

Supply alone does not tell you much. Utilization does. A token can hold a large share of deposits and still contribute very little if borrowing demand stays weak. So careful about judging a lending model by total deposits alone. Look at it by which assets actually generate borrow demand, spread income, and recurring usage.

The comparison with banking makes the constraint clearer. In 2024, Aave V3 posts an estimated 0.64% net interest margin, versus 2.48% for major US banks and 1.69% for major Canadian banks.

Aave V3 also shows a 40.0% loan to deposit ratio, compared with 61.2% for major US banks and 74.2% for major Canadian banks. The model runs with lower overhead, but it also runs with tighter economics and lower capital efficiency.

Leverage Used By Small Group Of Users

Repeated borrowing and redepositing of the same collateral accounts for about 20.46% of total borrowed volume and 8.20% of borrowing transactions on Aave V3.

Only about 2% of active users engage in this behaviour, but that small group borrows more often, takes larger positions, uses more flash loans, and runs closer to liquidation.

See:  Ledn Bitcoin Backed ABS Deal Enters Institutional Markets

Risk isn't evenly spread across the user base, but with a relatively small group of sophisticated users who amplify exposure through repeated borrow and redeposit loops. A protocol can look healthy at the aggregate level while vulnerability builds inside a small cluster of accounts.

Liquidations Hit In Waves

The largest liquidation wave in the sample reached about $258 million, and the top ten waves account for roughly 80% of total liquidated volume.

WETH, wstETH, WBTC, and weETH account for about 90% of total liquidated value. Collateral diversity on paper is not the same as resilience in practice. When account stress rises, losses still cluster around a small set of core assets.

Price Drops Trigger Most Losses

For all liquidated users, 84.40% of health factor deterioration comes from collateral price declines. For the largest borrowers, that rises to 97.28%. Interest rate changes play only a minor role in the hour before liquidation. So do borrower actions like repaying, withdrawing, borrowing, or supplying more assets.

See:  ECB Sets A Roadmap For Tokenized Finance Infrastructure

Immediate risk is mostly market driven. If collateral drops hard enough, the position breaks. Everything else is secondary.

Borrower Losses Add Up Fast

Liquidation fees range from about 5% to 10% of liquidated value. When missed upside from post liquidation price recovery is added, combined borrower losses can reach roughly 10% to 30%.

Automation protects lenders and preserves solvency, but it forces borrowers out at the worst possible time. That raises a harder design question. How do you reduce forced exits before volatility does the damage?

Better Risk Design Needs Broader Collateral

The authors highlight tokenized real world assets as a way to broaden the collateral base and improve stability. They point to decentralized identity frameworks to support better underwriting.

They also raise the question of prudential tools such as leverage limits, capital requirements, or liquidity thresholds.

See:  Slate Raises $1.3M for Embedded Lending in Canada

Concentration risk in DeFi isn't just exposure to a single token. It's dependence on a narrow collateral base, a narrow earnings base, and a narrow set of highly leveraged users. Broader collateral, stronger underwriting signals, and tighter limits can each address a different part of that problem.

What This Means For Builders And Market Operators

Focus on where revenue actually comes from. If earnings depend on a small number of assets, growth is more fragile than it looks.

Track who drives leverage, not just how many users exist. A small group can shape downside risk.

Improve collateral quality, not just collateral variety. Adding assets does not reduce risk if stress still runs through the same core tokens.

Build liquidation buffers into the product. Earlier warnings, better position visibility, and automated risk controls can reduce forced selling.

The strategic takeaway is DeFi lending demand isn't the issue, but rather risk concentration is. The platforms that stand out will spread exposure across better collateral, reduce reliance on highly leveraged users, and design systems that hold up when prices drop. That's how the model can mature from access to durable growth.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Canada vs Singapore: Different Tax Approach On Innovation

NCFA Insight | Innovation Policy And Funding

AI Image Tax policy and innovation

Canada Funds Build While Singapore Backs Growth

Canada and Singapore show two different ways to support innovation, and both compete to attract fintech, AI, and venture backed companies deciding where to build and grow. Singapore ranks among the strongest fintech hubs globally and remains especially prominent in Asia, which makes it a useful comparison for fintech policy, capital, and scale.

On March 26, 2026, Bill C-15 received Royal Assent, confirming stronger SR&ED support in Canada and adding more structure to the country's financial modernization agenda, including establishing Canada’s digital finance framework. Singapore combines tax relief with capital programs and AI incentives. For fintechs, AI firms, and other innovation led companies, the split affects where investment flows and where growth gets easier.

Category Canada Singapore
Primary tax support 35% enhanced SR&ED credit 40% corporate income tax rebate
Core cap Up to $6M of qualifying expenditures Up to S$30,000 rebate
Additional incentive Capital expenditures become eligible again 400% AI deduction up to S$50,000 and S$1,500 minimum cash grant
Eligibility expansion Taxable capital phase out widens to $15M to $75M and eligible Canadian public corporations can qualify Firms with at least one local employee in 2025 can qualify for grant support
Capital programs No new direct capital pool introduced in this package New and expanded capital pools in the same policy package. S$1B Startup SG Equity, S$1.5B Anchor Fund, S$1.5B Financial Sector Development Fund
Best fit Engineering heavy firms with high technical build cost Firms prioritizing expansion, hiring, AI adoption, and capital access
What it solves best Build cost recovery Commercial growth support

Canada Improves Conditions For Builders

Canada’s Bill C-15 SR&ED package benefits Canadian builders with heavy engineering, product, infrastructure, and technical development cost that arguably improves improves the case for keeping technical work in Canada. The benefit is strongest for fintech infrastructure, regtech, cybersecurity, AI, and data firms with deep product build requirements.

Tax support helps recover build cost. It doesn’t remove procurement drag, customer acquisition cost, distribution bottlenecks, startup visas or the need for growth capital. Firms can extend build runway. Commercial traction still depends on distribution, procurement, and growth capital.

Singapore Connects Tax Relief To Scale-Ups

Singapore’s company level tax benefits are smaller, but the package covers more of what companies need to expand. The package links tax relief to hiring, AI adoption, and capital access. That creates a stronger environment for companies that are past early product build and now need market reach, talent depth, and financing support.

Singapore’s National AI Impact Programme aims to support up to 10,000 enterprises and 100,000 workers over three years.

The Competitive Question

Canada improves build economics. Singapore provides more support for expansion and growth.

A company building core infrastructure, compliance tools, fraud systems, or AI models may gain real value from stronger SR&ED support in Canada. A company focused on enterprise sales, regional rollout, hiring, or capital access may still find stronger operating support in Singapore, a system built around expansion.

See:  Canadian Innovation Leaves Again in Alphawave’s $2.4B Exit

Canada is more attractive now for engineering heavy firms. The harder question is whether companies can also scale here more easily. If not, Canada still risks producing valuable technology that may end up growing elsewhere.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Canada’s Artemis II Moment Challenges How We Build

Apr 3, 2026 | NCFA Innovation Perspective | Moonshot Thinking

AI Image Canada moonshots

A Reminder Of What Big Thinking Takes

On April 1, 2026, Canada’s Artemis II mission reaches launch as Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen boards NASA’s Orion spacecraft, becoming the first Canadian and first non American on a mission beyond Earth orbit to the Moon.

It’s the first crewed Moon mission since 1972, and the 10 day flight around the Moon is designed to carry humans further from Earth than any mission before. For Canada, it’s proof that bold ambition still counts when a country backs talent, engineering, and strategic partnerships over a long stretch of time.

Artemis II isn’t the result of a quick push or a short funding cycle. It reflects decades of work in robotics, advanced systems, and international collaboration. Canada didn't get this seat by accident. It earned it. More founders, investors, institutions, and policymakers should stop and think about that.

This Didn’t Happen Overnight

Big outcomes rarely appear overnight. By the time the world sees the launch, the hard part has already been building quietly for years. Artemis II carries four astronauts around the Moon and back. Hansen’s place on that crew shows that Canada still plays a meaningful role in one of the most important technology programs now underway. That role is tied to long term Canadian contributions in space robotics, including the Canadarm legacy and Canada’s Canadarm3 commitment to the Lunar Gateway.

Ambition on its own is cheap. Everyone says they want to build big things. What matters is whether people keep going when the payoff is far away, the standards stay high, and the result is still uncertain. Artemis II shows what can happen when the mission stays clear and people stay committed.

This Is Bigger Than Space

This reaches far beyond aerospace. In fintech, financial infrastructure, artificial intelligence, and other serious technology sectors, people often talk about transformation. But real transformation asks for something uncomfortable. It asks for patience from backers, fellow builders and community. It asks for coordination. It asks for institutions that can think beyond the next quarter.

See:  Life Isn’t Linear: Curveballs and Strikeouts

If Canada wants stronger digital identity systems, better financial infrastructure, more globally competitive AI companies, deeper capital markets, and more durable domestic champions, it can’t keep thinking small and expect outsized results. Those goals take time. They take conviction. They take leadership that sticks with the work long enough for the advantage to build.

Artemis II gives Canada a live example of what that looks like when the bet is real, the timeline is long, and the standard doesn’t drop.

Canada Doesn’t Have A Talent Problem

Canada has talent. It has real technical depth. It has researchers, engineers, operators, and builders who can compete globally. What it often lacks is the willingness to place bigger bets and stay with them long enough. Artemis II is important for at least one key moonshot innovation reason. It exposes a familiar Canadian habit. We talk like a country with big potential, then act like one that is afraid to commit.

This mission shows that Canada can still contribute at the highest level when it decides to stay in the game. It also shows that credibility is earned over time. You don’t get invited into missions like this because people are being polite. You get there because your contribution is important and your capability is trusted. That should sound familiar to anyone trying to build a serious company in a serious market.

So What Does Bigger Thinking Actually Look Like

Moonshot thinking does not mean reckless thinking. It means taking on problems that are hard enough to matter and important enough to justify sustained effort. In practical terms, that could mean building financial infrastructure that removes friction across the system, creating AI tools that solve real regulated workflow problems, or designing funding models that help strong Canadian companies scale here instead of leaving early.

See:  Canada’s Innovation Paradox – Strong Start, Missing Impact

At first, that kind of ambition can look expensive, slow, or unrealistic. Later, it often looks obvious. That’s how breakthroughs actually play out. Artemis II is a reminder that countries don't build lasting relevance by backing lots of small bets. t’s built by committing to the work that defines what comes next.

This Can’t Be A One Off

Jeremy Hansen’s flight around the Moon gives Canada a rare public moment people can feel right away. The deeper value sits underneath that moment. This mission shows what long horizon ambition looks like when people actually follow through. It shows younger builders what serious technical achievement looks like. It shows investors and policymakers that long cycle bets can produce real global relevance. And it shows that Canada still has the ability to achieve moonshots when it chooses to commit.

The question now is whether Canada treats Artemis II as a celebration or as a standard. One gives us a proud moment. The other gives us something much more valuable. It gives us permission to think bigger, build longer, and stop pretending that incremental ambition will somehow produce exceptional results.

If this is what Canada can build over decades, what are you building today that is worth the same commitment?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

TCS Chicago Fintech Showcase At Morningstar Conference

Apr 2, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Wealth Investing And Trading

TCS Chicago Invites Canadian Fintechs to Apply to showcase

Canadian Fintech Opportunity To Reach U.S. Wealth Buyers

The Trade Commissioner Service at the Consulate General of Canada in Chicago is inviting Canadian fintech companies to apply for a Fintech Showcase focused on accessing U.S. institutional wealth and asset management buyers.

The showcase takes place during Morningstar’s June 17 and 18 investment conference in Chicago. The conference brings together advisors and other investment professionals. The agenda covers AI, private markets, retirement, and portfolio strategy. Those topics line up with current demand for better research, portfolio insight, and advisor productivity tools. View the agenda.

Selected companies will present in a four minute format to a senior audience across wealth and asset management. Evaluation focuses on business model, market opportunity, impact on wealth and asset management, investor outcomes, and presentation quality. Companies need a clear wealth use case, defined buyer, and measurable impact on investor outcomes.

See:  Canadian OneVest Advances WealthTech Innovation

This is best suited for Canadian wealthtech and investment technology firms that help advisors, asset managers, and investment platforms research, manage, personalize, or report on investments, or expand access and reduce friction for investors. It is a weaker fit for broad consumer fintech, horizontal infrastructure, or products without a clear link to wealth, asset management, or investor outcomes.

The application deadline is May 17, 2026. Apply now if your product is revenue ready and built for institutional wealth and asset management buyers.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Italy Fines Revolut Over Investment And Banking Practices

Apr 2, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Banking And Credit, Regulation And Policy

Freepik rawpixel.com Regulation

Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com

Consumer Disclosure And Account Controls Under Fire

On April 2, 2026, Italy’s competition authority (AGCM) fined Revolut group €11 million for unfair commercial practices tied to investment disclosures, payment account restrictions, and communication around Italian versus Lithuanian IBANs.

  • AGCM imposed a €5 million fine over how commission free investments were presented, saying customers were not clearly told from the first point of contact about additional costs and the limits of fractional shares.
  • Another €5 million fine targeted how payment accounts were suspended, limited, or blocked, with AGCM saying customers didn't receive clear pre-contractual information, advance notice, or enough support once restrictions were imposed.
  • A further €1.5 million fine focused on how Revolut explained the path to an Italian rather than Lithuanian IBAN, the bank account identifier used for transfers in Europe.

These fines come at a time when Revolut has grown into a bigger and more profitable company, and trying to look more like a primary banking platform than a fast growing fintech. In late March, Revolut reported $2.3B in profit before tax for 2025 with 68.3 million customers and $6B in revenue. Regulators expect more from a company with that type of scale; clarity, conduct, and professional account handling.

Regarding the IBAN issue,, the AGCM said Revolut didn't provide clear and exhaustive information on the requirements and timing for obtaining an Italian IBAN instead of a Lithuanian one. Revolut’s Italy account documentation now identifies Revolut Bank UAB Italian branch details and says the information sheet took effect on March 30, 2026. For a fintech trying to become more embedded in everyday banking, local account setup and customer communication are not side issues, and are important for trust and primary account use.

Revolut said it strongly disagrees with the findings and plans to appeal in the Italian courts. The company said the decision would have no impact on operations or its financial position. That response may settle investors in the short term, but its a sign that once a fintech reaches bank like scale, regulators stop looking only at growth and product breadth. They look much harder at how claims are framed, how restrictions are handled, and whether customers understand what they are actually getting.

See:  Revolut’s $75 Billion Valuation and New Canada Plans

Fractional investing, account controls, and local account migration can look like product details when a company is small. At scale, they become conduct risk. Italy’s decision shows how quickly those details can become costly once a fintech evolves deeper into the center of consumer finance.

Talking Point

When a fintech starts to look more like a primary bank, which becomes harder to defend at scale: aggressive growth tactics or unclear customer communication?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Bill C 15 Expands SR&ED For Canadian Builders

Apr 1, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Innovation Policy And Funding

Image Bill C 15 Expands SRED Benefits

Bigger SR&ED Credits Extend Runway For R&D Heavy Firms

On Mar 26, 2026, Bill C-15 received Royal Assent. Alongside Canada’s new digital finance framework, it also puts major Budget 2025 SR&ED changes into law. The enhanced 35% SR&ED credit now applies on up to $6M of qualifying expenditures, up from $3M. The taxable capital phase out range widens to $15M to $75M, up from $10M to $50M. Eligible Canadian public corporations can now access the enhanced credit, and capital expenditures become eligible again.

Change Before After Why It Matters
Enhanced 35% expenditure ceiling $3M $6M Companies can keep the higher credit rate on another $3M of qualifying work, which improves cash flow for teams already spending heavily on product and engineering.
Taxable capital phase out range $10M to $50M $15M to $75M More growing firms can qualify for the enhanced regime longer instead of losing support too early.
Enhanced credit access Mainly CCPC focused Includes eligible Canadian public corporations Some listed Canadian firms with real product and R&D intensity can now claim richer support instead of falling outside the enhanced lane.
Capital expenditures Not eligible Eligible again This impacts firms that need equipment, testing environments, and technical infrastructure, not just payroll, to build.

Who Benefits Most

The biggest gains go to qualifying companies already spending heavily on development and infrastructure. That may include payments firms building fraud and risk systems, regtech firms developing compliance tooling, AI firms training and testing models, and data infrastructure companies investing ahead of revenue. Early stage teams with smaller claims still benefit, but the larger payoff goes to companies that were already hitting the old ceiling or losing support as they grew.

The program is stronger, but it still rewards discipline. Claims still depend on technical records, project detail, and the ability to show eligible experimental work. Companies with weak documentation simply won't capture the full benefit.

Two simple examples:

A Canadian payments company with $5M in eligible SR&ED spending used to reach the enhanced ceiling at $3M. Under the new rules, another $2M of that spend qualifies for the enhanced rate. That doesn't fix product market fit, but it can reduce cash burn and make it easier to keep engineering teams in place.

See:  Budget 2025 Accelerates Fintech, AI, and Capital Growth

A public company building AI driven compliance software may now benefit in two ways at once. It can access the enhanced credit if it qualifies, and it can include eligible capital costs tied to technical build out. That makes the program more relevant to how software and infrastructure firms actually spend.

Takeaway

Bill C-15 makes SR&ED more useful for companies with real development spend. The ceiling doubles to $6M, the phase out range widens, public company access expands, and capital costs come back into scope. For Canadian fintech and AI builders, that can extend runway and support more product development work.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter