Global fintech and funding innovation ecosystem

Category Archives: Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health

The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giants

Competition | Feb 12, 2024

Unsplash hisuccc Google - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giants

Image: Unsplash/hisuccc

The global community has begun to question whether big tech corporations are being held suitably accountable for their actions.

Today technology companies have grown to unprecedented sizes, their influence permeates every facet of our daily lives. From how we communicate and consume media to the way we shop and interact with the world around us, tech giants like Google, Meta (formerly Facebook), Amazon, and others have become central to our digital existence.

The Rise of Regulatory Interventions

Recently, there's been a shift in how governments approach the regulation of tech giants:

  • The European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a prime example, identifying 22 "gatekeeper" services that will face stringent new rules aimed at ensuring fair competition and innovation.
  • Meta complied with the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to sell the animated images platform Giphy, signaling a growing willingness among tech companies to adapt to regulatory demands. These actions represent significant steps toward curbing the unchecked power of Big Tech, setting a precedent for other nations to follow.

See:  DoF Consultation: Financial Competition in Canada

  • Also, the Canadian government took decisive action against Facebook (now Meta Platforms Inc.) over privacy violations. Stemming from the global Cambridge Analytica scandal, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada found in 2019 that Facebook had contravened Canadian privacy laws by inadequately protecting Canadians' personal information. This failure allowed third-party applications to access users' data without obtaining explicit consent, spotlighting serious flaws in Facebook's approach to privacy and its compliance with national regulations. Despite the investigation's findings, Facebook contested the Privacy Commissioner's authority and recommendations, leading to a legal standoff that highlighted the challenges faced by national regulators in enforcing compliance among global tech behemoths.
  • The approach to tech regulation varies significantly across jurisdictions. Japan, for instance, has recently begun to implement new legislation focused on data protection and social media platforms.
  • Australia's News Media Bargaining Code forced major tech companies to negotiate payment with Australian media companies for their content. These examples illustrate the diverse strategies employed worldwide to manage the impact of Big Tech, reflecting different national priorities and regulatory philosophies.

The Role of Competition Law and Litigation

Competition law has emerged as a key tool in establishing checks and balances against the monopolistic tendencies of Big Tech. The landmark judgment in Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) underscored this point, linking breaches of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to abuses of dominant market positions. This case, among others, highlights a growing recognition of the need to adapt legal frameworks to address the unique challenges posed by the digital economy.

See:  CFPB (Office of Competition and Innovation) is Shifting Policies that Provide Special Regulatory Treatment for Individual Firms

In 2021, the Canadian Competition Bureau launched an investigation into Google's alleged anti-competitive practices, focusing on the tech giant's dominance in the online advertising market. This investigation is a critical example of how competition law is applied to ensure that the digital economy remains competitive and innovative.

Beyond governmental action, private litigation has proven to be a potent tool in holding tech companies to account. High-profile cases, such as Google's settlement over privacy allegations in its "incognito" mode, have brought significant public attention to the practices of these corporations. These legal battles, while challenging, play a crucial role in ensuring that tech giants cannot operate above the law.

Ben Lasserson, Partner, Mishcon de Reya:

Each of the Big Tech giants is essentially a monopolist in their own ecosystem

Unsplash Matthew Henry privacy - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giants

Image: Unsplash/Matthew Henry

Best Practices for Regulating Tech Giants

The goal is to create a digital ecosystem where tech companies can thrive and innovate while ensuring they do not abuse their market power to the detriment of consumers and smaller competitors. Here are some key best practices:

1. Clear and Adaptable Regulatory Frameworks

  • Regulations should be clearly defined to avoid ambiguity that tech giants could exploit. Laws need to precisely target anti-competitive behaviors without stifling innovation. Given the rapid pace of technological change, regulatory frameworks must be adaptable. This could involve sunset clauses for regulations to be reviewed and updated regularly based on the evolving digital landscape.

See:  Is productivity, wealth creation and competition at the forefront of Canada’s growth agenda?

2. Promoting Fair Competition

  • Implementing strict anti-monopoly measures to prevent market dominance that stifles competition. This includes scrutinizing mergers and acquisitions that could lead to unfair market consolidation.
  • Ensuring that smaller players have fair access to markets dominated by tech giants. This could involve mandating interoperability standards or opening up platforms to third-party developers under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

3. Consumer Protection

  • Strengthening privacy and data protection laws to ensure that consumers' personal information is not exploited for profit without explicit consent. This includes enforcing transparent data practices and giving consumers control over their data.  (See:  67 of top 1000 US websites violate EUs GDPR law)
  • Requiring tech companies to be transparent about algorithms, data collection practices, and the use of personal data. This transparency can empower consumers to make informed decisions about their digital interactions.

4. Encouraging Innovation

  • Creating a supportive environment for startups and smaller tech companies through grants, tax incentives, and access to resources. This can help foster innovation and provide viable alternatives to services offered by tech giants.
  • Promoting the use of open standards to encourage interoperability and compatibility across different platforms and services, facilitating innovation and competition.

5. International Cooperation

  • Working towards global regulatory standards for digital markets can help prevent tech giants from exploiting regulatory gaps between countries. International cooperation can lead to a more consistent approach to antitrust enforcement, data protection, and cyber security.

See:  BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competition

  • Establishing agreements on cross-border data flows that protect consumer privacy while not impeding global digital commerce.

6. Effective Enforcement

  • Ensuring that regulatory bodies have robust enforcement mechanisms, the authority and resources to enforce regulations effectively. This includes the ability to impose significant penalties for non-compliance that are substantial enough to deter anti-competitive behavior.
  • Establishing mechanisms for consumers to report grievances and seek redress for harms caused by the actions of tech giants. This can include simplified legal processes or dedicated consumer protection agencies.

7. Stakeholder Engagement

  • Engaging a broad range of stakeholders, including tech companies, consumer groups, academics, and policymakers, in the regulatory process. This inclusive approach can help ensure that regulations are balanced, effective, and reflective of diverse perspectives.

8. Monitoring and Research

  • Continuous regularly monitoring the tech sector for emerging trends and potential anti-competitive behaviors. This can help regulators stay ahead of the curve and address issues proactively.  Investing in research to understand the impacts of digital technologies on society, competition, and the economy. This knowledge can inform evidence-based policymaking.

Conclusion

the path to regulating tech giants will undoubtedly require a concerted effort from all stakeholders. The outlined best practices offer a roadmap for creating a digital environment that prioritizes consumer welfare, fosters healthy competition, and encourages innovation.

See:  FCA’s Emerging Regulatory Strategy for Big Tech and Artificial Intelligence

By embracing these principles, regulators can ensure that the benefits of the digital age are widely shared, preventing monopolization by a few dominant players. The journey is complex, but through vigilance, adaptability, and collaboration, we can shape a digital ecosystem that benefits all, characterized by innovation, fairness, and respect for individual rights.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech GiantsThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech GiantsFF Logo 400 v3 - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giantscommunity social impact - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giants

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - The Global Effort to Level the Playing Field with Tech Giants




 

Globalive’s Lacavera Acquires Wealth One Bank

M&A News | Feb 12, 2024

Globalive Capital has officially entered into an agreement to acquire Wealth One Bank of Canada, a move that is currently pending regulatory and government approvals.

Anthony Lacavera, the visionary founder of Globalive Capital Inc., has once again made headlines, this time in the Canadian banking sector. Following his successful disruption of the telecom industry with Wind Mobile, Lacavera is poised to bring his innovative approach to banking with the acquisition of Wealth One Bank of Canada.

See:  KOHO’s Strategic Push Towards A Banking License

  • An article in the Wealth Professional reported that Lacavera had raised $51 million for a consortium bid through a special purpose vehicle to secure a 54% stake in Wealth One Bank with existing shareholders retaining a minority share, which has been navigating federally imposed national security conditions.  The deal is supported by a mix of Canadian and U.S. backers and could see further capital injections of up to $200 million in the future.
  • With over $600 million in assets as of November, according to the latest filings with the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions.
  • This strategic acquisition is aiming to leverage Wealth One's Schedule 1 banking license to provide Canadians with more choices in banking services, echoing Lacavera's commitment to challenge and diversify industries that benefit from increased competition.

Addressing the Oligopoly

Lacavera criticizes the current banking oligopoly for stifling competition, leading to higher prices and a diminished experience for Canadian consumers. His bid for Wealth One is seen as a long-term strategy to introduce more competition into the market, which he believes is crucial for the economy.

See:  DoF Consultation: Financial Competition in Canada

The focus is not just on serving the Chinese immigrant community, which was Wealth One's initial target since its launch in 2016, but on expanding offerings to all Canadians, including the approximately 500,000 newcomers arriving each year.

Challenges and Regulatory Scrutiny

The bid comes amid national security concerns, with the federal government previously citing potential links between Wealth One and the Chinese government. This led to directives for three investors to sever ties with the bank. Despite these challenges, Lacavera is confident in the bank's solid foundation and believes that the acquisition could alleviate regulatory and government concerns.

Outlook

Anthony Lacavera's track record of innovation and disruption promises a future where competition is intensified, and consumers have access to a broader range of banking services. While regulatory hurdles loom, the acquisition aligns with the broader goals of enhancing financial inclusivity and choice for Canadians across the country.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Globalive's Lacavera Acquires Wealth One BankThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - Globalive's Lacavera Acquires Wealth One BankFF Logo 400 v3 - Globalive's Lacavera Acquires Wealth One Bankcommunity social impact - Globalive's Lacavera Acquires Wealth One Bank

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - Globalive's Lacavera Acquires Wealth One Bank




 

Prometheum’s Controversial ETH Custody Launch

Digital Assets | Release | Feb 8, 2024

Freepik Ethereum - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody Launch

Image by Freepik

Prometheum Launches Ethereum Custodial Services.  A Controversial Step Towards Regulatory Clarity?

Prometheum Inc. officially announced the launch of custodial services for Ethereum's ether (ETH) token, on February 7, 2024, as a direct result of Prometheum's subsidiary, Prometheum Capital LLC, receiving approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) as a Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (SPBD). This approval allows the firm to custody, clear, and settle digital asset securities, setting a new precedent for the digital asset sector in a manner that complies with U.S. financial regulations. This approval is a big deal because it shows that Prometheum is operating within the legal framework set by regulatory bodies, which is not always common in the crypto space.

See:  Post-Merge Will Ether Be Closer to a Security?

  • By opening up its services to institutional clients like asset management firms, hedge funds, and banks, Prometheum is paving the way for more significant investments in cryptocurrencies from these entities. Institutional investors have traditionally been cautious about entering the crypto market due to regulatory uncertainties and security concerns. Prometheum's regulated and compliant platform could encourage more institutional money into the crypto space, potentially increasing the market's stability and maturity.  The service is set to launch in Q1 2024.
  • One of the most controversial aspects of this announcement is the implication that ETH could be considered a security.  If ETH is custodied under a FINRA member firm and an SEC-registered broker-dealer, it suggests a level of regulatory scrutiny and acceptance that could influence how cryptocurrencies, particularly Ethereum, are viewed and regulated in the future.
  • A precedent could be set for other cryptocurrencies and digital assets, showing that it is possible to operate within the existing regulatory framework. This could lead to more crypto firms seeking regulatory approval and compliance, contributing to a more regulated and less volatile crypto market.

See:  Ethereum’s Market Dynamics and Outlook in 2024

  • Prometheum's plan to extend its services to include trading, clearing, and settlement for both retail and institutional clients indicates a move towards creating a comprehensive, blockchain-enabled market infrastructure. This could make digital asset trading more accessible and safer for a broader audience, further integrating cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial ecosystem.

Cautious Optimism

This development, while seen as a pioneering effort to bridge the gap between traditional finance and the burgeoning world of cryptocurrencies, has also raised eyebrows and sparked debates across the industry about the classification of Ethereum as a security or a commodity. A clear stance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on this matter, prompted by Prometheum's custodial services, could provide much-needed regulatory clarity for the industry.

Critics argue that by potentially classifying Ethereum as a security, Prometheum's actions could impose stringent regulatory burdens on the broader crypto industry, stifling innovation and limiting the decentralized ethos that cryptocurrencies were built upon. There is a fear that such a move could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny on other cryptocurrencies, altering the landscape of the crypto market in unpredictable ways.

See:  SEC Greenlights Bitcoin ETFs. Is Ethereum Next?

The controversy also stems from concerns about the centralization of custodial services. By holding investors' digital assets, custodial services like those offered by Prometheum could concentrate power and control, moving away from the decentralized model that many in the crypto community advocate for.

Conclusion

Prometheum's launch of Ethereum custodial services is a watershed moment for the crypto industry.  As the industry grapples with related issues, the launch could set important precedents for the future of cryptocurrency regulation and adoption.  For stakeholders in the crypto and financial sectors, including members of the National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA) of Canada, this development serves as a reminder of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody LaunchThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody LaunchFF Logo 400 v3 - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody Launchcommunity social impact - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody Launch

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - Prometheum's Controversial ETH Custody Launch




 

BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competition

Research | Feb 7, 2024

BoE Staff Paper Open Banking early evidence - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competition

Image: BoE Staff Working Paper No. 1,059

Open Banking Boosts Competition and Productivity, Transforming Financial Services Landscape

The Bank of England recently published Staff Working Paper No. 1,059 titled "Customer data access and fintech entry: early evidence from open banking"  The research on Open Banking (OB) policies provides substantial evidence that implementing OB can indeed improve competition and productivity within a country and offers valuable insights into its impact on fintech entry, consumer benefits, and SME outcomes.

Countries with Open Banking 'Have More'

One of the most striking outcomes of OB policies is the substantial increase in fintech entry and innovation. The study reveals that the adoption of OB policies has led to a one-third increase in venture capital-backed fintech financings and a doubling in the investment amounts. This surge in fintech activity is indicative of a more competitive environment driven by the availability of customer financial data, spanning a wide array of financial products, including financial advice applications, credit services, payments, and regulatory technology (regtech), underscoring the versatility and utility of OB data across the financial ecosystem.  This innovation is not limited to fintech startups but extends to existing financial institutions that adapt to the new competitive landscape by offering more tailored and efficient services.

See:  Feds Promise Open Banking Laws in 2024 and to Broaden Access to Payments Canada

Countries with OB policies have about twice as many banks offering APIs compared to those without such policies. This increase in API offerings is a direct indicator of OB's role in enhancing data sharing in the financial services industry, thereby promoting competition among banks and fintech companies.

The research finds a strong positive association between OB policies and economic characteristics such as GDP per capita and population, suggesting that countries adopting OB are likely to see enhanced economic activity and productivity as a result of increased competition and innovation in the financial sector.

Enhancing Consumer Financial Well-being

For consumers, the benefits of OB are twofold: enhanced financial knowledge and improved access to credit products. These findings underscore OB's potential to empower consumers with the tools and information necessary to make informed financial decisions.

  • Consumers engaging with advice OB have been found to gain greater financial knowledge and literacy.
  • Consumers utilizing credit OB enjoy better access to credit products.
  • The study's quantitative model suggests that OB is welfare-improving for all customers, even when data is used for screening purposes.

Supporting SME Growth and Financial Inclusion

OB is shown to enhance utility, entry, and competition in business-to-business products and SME credit markets. This indicates an improvement in the overall productivity of the financial sector, as SMEs benefit from better access to financial services and advice.

See:  Canada’s Open Banking Journey: Interview with EY’s Dr. Francesco Pisani and Dr. Alexander Christoph

Eligibility for OB has been linked to a higher likelihood of SMEs forming new lending relationships, especially with non-bank lenders, facilitating increased access to finance.  This is particularly significant for SMEs with prior lending relationships, who are more likely to secure new loans and benefit from lower interest rates.

Summary

The findings are clear: countries embracing OB witness a remarkable uptick in fintech innovation and entry, backed by an increase in venture capital investments. This innovation extends beyond new market entrants, encouraging traditional financial institutions to adapt and thrive in a rejuvenated competitive landscape. The doubling of banks offering APIs in OB-adopting countries further cements OB's role in fostering a more open, competitive, and innovative financial services industry.

See:  Open Banking: Revolutionizing Financial Data Sharing

Moreover, the positive correlation between OB policies and key economic indicators underscores the broader economic upliftment potential of OB, promising enhanced productivity and economic activity. For consumers and SMEs alike, the advent of OB heralds a new era of financial well-being and inclusion, offering improved access to credit, enhanced financial knowledge, and greater opportunities for growth and development.

Download the 105 page PDF research report --> here


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, CompetitionThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, CompetitionFF Logo 400 v3 - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competitioncommunity social impact - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competition

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - BoE Report: Open Banking Boosts Productivity, Competition




 

Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated Content

AI | Feb 7, 2024

Meta Expands AI-generated Image Labeling To Enhance Transparency and Accountability Across All Platforms

According to TechCrunch, Meta is broadening the scope of its AI-generated imagery labeling posted by users to enhance transparency and user awareness  The strategic move is expected to increase the volume of labeled AI-generated synthetic versus authentic content distribution on Meta's platforms.  The rollout of expanded labeling will occur in the coming months, covering all languages supported by each app.  Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs, emphasized the company's collaboration with industry partners to establish common technical standards signaling AI-generated content.

Challenges and Standards

The task of labeling AI-generated content extends beyond images to the more complex realms of video and audio. Current technology faces challenges in detecting AI-generated videos and audio due to the nascent adoption of marking and watermarking necessary for effective detection. Meta is exploring various strategies to overcome these obstacles, including the development of classifiers to detect AI-generated content lacking invisible markers and efforts to make it more difficult to remove or alter invisible watermarks.

See:  The Frontline of AI’s Copyright Law Battle in 2024

Meta's policy now requires users to disclose when posting "photorealistic" AI-generated video or "realistic-sounding" audio, reserving the right to label content deemed to pose a high risk of deceiving the public on matters of importance. Failure to comply with this disclosure requirement could result in penalties under Meta's Community Standards.

Meta's proactive measures reflect a commitment to safeguarding the integrity of digital content, particularly in the context of significant global events such as elections.  By working with other leading companies and forums like the Partnership on AI, Meta aims to develop common standards for identifying AI-generated content. This collaborative approach seeks to mitigate the potential harms associated with generative AI, including the proliferation of fake but realistic-seeming content.

The potential for deepfakes and other forms of misleading content also looms large, necessitating advanced detection technologies and ethical guidelines to safeguard against misuse.

Impact on Creators

On one hand, generative AI technologies offer artists, photographers, videographers, and other content creators unprecedented tools for creativity and innovation. These tools can generate new forms of art, enhance productivity, and open up new avenues for artistic expression that were previously unimaginable.

However, the labeling of AI-generated content introduces a layer of complexity regarding authenticity and originality. For creators who pride themselves on producing original content, the rise of AI-generated imagery could dilute the perceived value of human creativity.

See:  Canada New AI Copyright Policy Consultation

One huge area to watch is the is how creators' work is received and monetized if their content is labeled AI-generated / augmented versus holistically authentic.  If AI-generated content is labeled as such, it might be treated differently by algorithms, affecting visibility, engagement, and revenue opportunities. Creators may need to adapt by clearly distinguishing between AI-assisted and purely human-made creations, potentially affecting their creative process and how they market their work.

Future of AI in Digital Media

As we look ahead, the integration of AI in digital media promises to reshape the landscape of content creation, offering both challenges and opportunities. The ongoing dialogue between technology, creativity, and ethics will be pivotal in forging a future where AI-generated and human-created content not only coexist but also enhance our digital experiences in meaningful ways.

See:  Australia to Regulate High-Risk Artificial Intelligence

Meta's initiative to label AI-generated content on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Threads is a signal and big step towards ensuring transparency and trust online. This strategic move, aimed at distinguishing between synthetic and authentic content, if successful, will help establish sets a new standard for accountability and ethical practices in the tech industry.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated ContentThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated ContentFF Logo 400 v3 - Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated Contentcommunity social impact - Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated Content

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - Meta Seeks New Standards in Labeling AI-generated Content




 

Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Future

Climate Inflation | Feb 6, 2024

Freepik climate change - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Future

Image by Freepik

In a recent podcast, Anna Dean and Stephen Jacobi feature the pressing issue of Climate Inflation and key takeaways

The podcast highlighted a critical warning from economist Paul Conway, Chief Economist at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, about the emerging challenge of climate inflation.

He stated that climate change is in part responsible for recent inflation and the cost of living crisis - the rising cost of food, spiralling insurance premiums, the escalating cost of construction (as a result of additional demand created in cyclone/flood-damaged areas) pose a threat to economic stability and personal finance.

The insights shared in the podcast underscore the urgency of integrating climate considerations into financial planning and investment strategies, emphasizing the need for the financial sector to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change.

See:  Harnessing Decentralized Finance to Combat Climate Change: A New Era of Sustainable Finance

The mention of rising home insurance bills due to climate change highlights the broader implications for the insurance industry and financial markets. As risks increase, there could be significant shifts in how risks are assessed and priced, affecting homeowners, businesses, and insurers.

Policy Implications

The realization that climate change is affecting people's financial well-being could catalyze political action. Historically, the lack of immediate economic impact has made it challenging to mobilize political will and public support for significant climate policies. However, as the economic consequences become more apparent, there may be increased pressure on governments to take decisive action on climate change, potentially leading to more aggressive environmental policies and investments in sustainable infrastructure.

Climate Inflation Discussion

The discussion suggests a growing awareness among the public and businesses about the tangible effects of climate change on their daily lives and financial health. This awareness could lead to changes in consumer behavior, such as increased demand for sustainable products and services, as well as changes in business practices towards more sustainable operations.

See:  Biden’s Clean Energy Plan vs. Banking Regulations

The presence of climate change skeptics and deniers in the discussion, as well as references to "climate scams," indicates ongoing challenges in achieving consensus on climate action. Overcoming misinformation and skepticism remains a significant hurdle for mobilizing collective action on climate change.

Comments

Kevin Brady criticizes the reliance on economists for leadership on climate change, arguing that they lack understanding of what is crucial for ecosystem resilience and human survival. This comment is insightful because it suggests a broader, more holistic view of addressing climate change, emphasizing the importance of integrating ecological sustainability into economic decision-making.

Iain Climie discusses the immense benefits of reducing food waste, citing the IMECHE's "Waste Not Want Not" report, which notes that at least 30% of global food production is wasted. This comment is insightful because it implicitly critiques the inefficiency of current food systems and suggests a potential area for impactful change.

See:  Canadian Banks Face Scrutiny Over Sustainability Claims

Colin Grant argues that the last hope for addressing climate change lies in massive-scale ecosystem regeneration, a solution that is not prioritized by most governments. This comment is insightful because it goes beyond merely reducing emissions and emphasizes the importance of restoring natural habitats and biodiversity as a way to sequester carbon, regulate climate, and support life on Earth.

Nathan Simmonds questions how long it will be until the systems supporting human civilization collapse under their own weight, critiquing the encouragement of over-consumption and pollution by businesses and institutions. This comment is insightful because it highlights the unsustainable nature of current consumption patterns and the blame placed on individuals for systemic issues.

Conclusion

As we live the adverse affects of climate inflation, let's commit to fostering sustainable economic growth through education, innovation, and collaboration. By doing so, we can ensure a resilient financial future that benefits all Canadians and sets a global standard for sustainability in finance.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable FutureThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable FutureFF Logo 400 v3 - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Futurecommunity social impact - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Future

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - Climate Inflation Discussion for a Sustainable Future




 

UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and Implications

UK Digital Sandbox | Feb 6, 2024

The UK's Digital Securities Sandbox Regulations Are A Catalyst for Global Fintech Innovation

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Digital Securities Sandbox) Regulations 2023, which came into effect on January 8, 2024 and introduces the UK's first digital securities sandbox, allowing firms to explore new technologies within a flexible legislative framework. The move is a clear signal of the UK's ambition to modernize its financial market infrastructure through digital asset technology, with a particular emphasis on distributed ledger technology (DLT).

The Role of DLT in Financial Market Infrastructure

DLT is at the heart of this legislative innovation. Its decentralized nature offers a transformative potential for the operation of central securities depositories and trading venues. By enabling direct ownership of investments and bypassing intermediaries, DLT could significantly enhance transparency and efficiency in the financial markets.

See:  UK Releases Digital Asset Consultation Results

The technology promises round-the-clock operations, near-instantaneous settlement, and the potential for new models of shareholding, trading, and settlement services.

Legal and Regulatory Adjustments

The implementation of the digital securities sandbox necessitates a series of legal and regulatory adjustments to ensure that digital transactions are recognized and facilitated within the UK's legal framework, addressing potential issues such as the registration of transfers and the maintenance of company records on a distributed ledger. Key areas of focus include amendments to:

Who Can Use the Sandbox and How Does It Work?

The sandbox is open to UK-established entities that meet specific eligibility criteria set out in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Digital Securities Sandbox) Regulations 2023. These entities include, but are not limited to, financial services firms, technology companies, and other organizations that are exploring innovative financial products, services, or business models that utilize digital securities and DLT.

  • Firms interested in participating in the digital securities sandbox must apply to enter the program. The application process involves submitting a detailed proposal of the technology or innovation to be tested, including how it intends to use DLT or other digital asset technologies within the financial market infrastructure. The proposal must also outline the objectives of the test, the expected outcomes, and how it aligns with the sandbox's goals.

See:  European Blockchain and DLT for SMEs Guide

  • To be accepted into the sandbox, applicants must demonstrate that they are UK-established entities and meet the eligibility criteria specified in the regulations. This includes the ability to show that the proposed innovation requires testing within the sandbox environment due to its novel or unique nature and that the firm has the necessary resources and plans in place to manage the test effectively.
  • Participants in the sandbox are allowed to test their innovations under a modified legislative framework. This means certain regulations may be applied, disapplied, or modified to facilitate the testing of new technologies. Firms must clearly understand which regulatory modifications apply to their test and ensure compliance with the sandbox's conditions.
  • Sandbox participants are required to provide regular updates (reporting) and feedback to the regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Bank of England, if applicable. This includes reporting on the progress of the test, any challenges encountered, and the outcomes achieved. The regulators may also set specific evaluation criteria to assess the test's success and its potential impact on the market and consumers.
  • Firms must have a clear exit strategy for concluding their test within the sandbox. This includes plans for winding down the test in a way that minimizes any adverse effects on consumers and the market. Upon exiting the sandbox, firms may be required to submit a final report summarizing the test's findings and any next steps for implementing the innovation outside the sandbox environment.

See:  Bank of Canada, TMX say blockchain feasible for securities settlement

The sandbox offers a unique opportunity for firms to explore and develop innovative digital securities solutions within a supportive regulatory environment. By participating in the program, firms can contribute to the evolution of the UK's financial market infrastructure and potentially set precedents for future regulatory frameworks in the fintech sector.

Implications for Canadian and Global Fintech

The UK's digital securities sandbox offers valuable insights for Canada and the global fintech community. For Canadian fintech, this initiative serves as a model for how regulatory frameworks can evolve to support technological advancements while ensuring market stability.  While there are a number of sandbox programs across Canada, in the past industry experts have lamented that regulators are simply pushing interested parties to existing registration categories without being a full service digital sandbox that allows companies to 'test novel innovations' wholeheartedly with the support of regulators.  Perhaps the closest sandbox to the above definition is Alberta's Bill 13.  The Canadian Securities Administrators host the Financial Innovation Hub where you can learn more and reach out directly.  All of this highlights the importance of creating a conducive environment for testing and integrating new technologies like DLT.

Globally, the UK's approach underscores the need for international cooperation and the harmonization of legal and regulatory frameworks to facilitate the adoption of DLT and other fintech innovations. As financial markets become increasingly interconnected, establishing common standards and practices will be crucial for the seamless integration of new technologies across jurisdictions.

Next Steps and Future Innovations

The sandbox is set to operate for five years, until January 8, 2029, managed by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England.

See:  UK launches pioneering digital securities sandbox

This period will allow firms and regulators to collaboratively explore the capabilities and implications of DLT and other digital asset technologies within a controlled environment. The flexibility of the sandbox framework, coupled with the potential for HM Treasury to create further sandboxes with different configurations, opens the door to continuous innovation and adaptation in the UK's legal framework to accommodate emerging technologies.


NCFA Jan 2018 resize - UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and ImplicationsThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Latest news - UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and ImplicationsFF Logo 400 v3 - UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and Implicationscommunity social impact - UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and Implications

Support NCFA by Following us on Twitter!







NCFA Sign up for our newsletter - UK Digital Securities Sandbox: A Guide and Implications