Global fintech and funding innovation ecosystem

Category Archives: Web3, Decentralization, DAOs

Canadian Crypto Ownership Hits 25% In OSC Survey

July 29, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Wealth Investing And Trading, Risk Compliance And Regtech

AI Image – Canadian investors connecting with crypto and tokenized assets

Canadian Crypto Ownership, Advice And Product Demand

On July 28, 2026, the Ontario Securities Commission released its Crypto Assets 2025 survey, providing an updated national baseline for crypto ownership, investor behaviour, platform use, financial advice, stablecoins and tokenized assets.

Ipsos surveyed 2,360 Canadian adults online between December 18, 2025, and January 22, 2026. Crypto owners were oversampled to provide a large enough subgroup for analysis, then weighted to reflect the Canadian population. Results for the total sample have a credibility interval of approximately 2.5 percentage points, with wider intervals for smaller groups.

The survey results show a market that has recovered from its 2023 decline and is becoming more connected to financial advisors, registered platforms and established institutions. The data also underscores why ownership alone can't measure market maturity. Customer knowledge, custody decisions, promotional pressure and financial losses remain part of the same picture.

Ownership and Outlook

  • 59% correctly identified crypto assets, up from 54% in 2023 and 51% in 2022
  • 25% currently owned crypto assets or crypto funds, up from 10% in 2023 and 13% in 2022
  • 39% of investors owned some form of crypto product. Ownership reached 44% among self directed investors and 30% among investors working with an advisor
  • 35% of Canadians aware of crypto reported high familiarity, compared with 27% in 2023
  • 38% said they were likely to buy crypto within 12 months, up from 20% in 2023
  • 43% believed crypto already plays a key financial role, while 52% expected it to play a key role in the future
  • 38% of direct crypto owners reported holdings above $20,000. Among crypto fund owners, 45% reported more than $20,000

Buying, Advice and Platform Use

  • 59% acquired crypto through a centralized trading platform, compared with 18% through a decentralized exchange
  • 48% of centralized platform users had used Coinbase, followed by Wealthsimple Crypto at 37%, Crypto.com at 29% and Binance at 20%. Respondents could identify more than one platform
  • 22% consulted a financial advisor before buying, up from 13% in 2023
  • 39% of advised investors said an advisor recommended crypto, nearly double the 19% reported in 2023. Most recommendations involved 10% or less of the portfolio
  • 50% checked whether their platform was registered, up from 38% in 2023
  • 67% recalled receiving a crypto risk disclosure before purchasing through a centralized platform
  • 74% of centralized platform users paid transaction fees, compared with 57% in 2023

Promotion, Custody and Customer Experience

  • 53% recalled seeing crypto advertising, up from 45% in 2023. Social media was the leading source
  • 31% recalled receiving a platform purchase bonus, 28% had seen a referral offer and 29% had seen a personality promoting a particular platform
  • 49% stored crypto on the platform where it was purchased, while 35% used an online wallet and 8% used a hardware wallet
  • 15% of centralized platform users reported a financial loss involving fraud, scams or hacking
  • 10% had been unable to withdraw money, 9% had been unable to withdraw crypto and 10% said they didn't understand the fees they paid
  • 33% of people who had owned crypto reported significant regret, while 51% reported little or no regret

Stablecoins and Tokenized Assets

  • 34% had heard of stablecoins, while 11% said they had held or used one during the previous 12 months
  • 89% of stablecoin owners had used them. Uses included exchanging them for other crypto at 38%, converting them to cash at 36%, earning yield at 30%, paying for goods or services at 24% and making international transfers at 20%
  • 24% had heard of tokenized real world assets
  • 74% of those familiar with tokenized assets would consider investing if their bank or investment firm offered tokenized government bonds, money market funds or similar products

Ownership Rebounded Across The Market

The increase from 10% to 25% is the survey's largest headline, but it needs to be read carefully. The OSC definition includes direct crypto assets and crypto investment funds. It also captures a later market period than the Bank of Canada's most recent detailed ownership study.

The Bank of Canada estimated that approximately 10% of Canadians owned Bitcoin in late 2023. That research covered Bitcoin specifically, used a different survey and was conducted more than two years before the OSC's latest survey work.

Within the OSC's own series, however, the direction is clear. Ownership, familiarity, purchase intentions and confidence all recovered from their 2023 lows. The latest ownership rate is also well above the 13% recorded in 2022.

The reasons people bought crypto provides more context. Portfolio diversification was cited by 28%, long term confidence in crypto or its technology by 27% and speculation by 26%. Investors aren't necessarily entering the market for one common reason. Some see an alternative asset class, some want exposure to the technology and others are trading for shorter term returns.

The barriers are just as varied. Among people who hadn't purchased crypto, 43% said they didn't understand it well enough, 43% worried about fraud or scams, 41% considered it too much like gambling and 41% cited price volatility. Those concerns have softened in some areas since 2023, but they haven't disappeared.

Ownership also says little about customer value on its own. A person holding $200 on one platform and an investor holding $100,000 through several products both count as owners. The OSC found that 60% of direct owners held no more than $20,000, while 38% reported more. Platforms and investors still need transaction volume, account retention, asset concentration and revenue data to understand the commercial depth behind the national ownership rate.

Advisors And Platforms Take A Larger Role

The change in financial advice may prove more consequential than the ownership headline. Among investors working with an advisor, 39% said their advisor had recommended crypto assets. That compares with 19% in 2023 and 21% in 2022.

Most recommendations remained limited but still --> twenty-five percent said their advisor recommended an allocation of 10% or less, while 14% reported a recommendation above 10%. Sixty percent said crypto wasn't recommended. Even so, they show crypto entering more client conversations. The percentage consulting an advisor before buying rose to 22%, while financial press reached 19% and provincial securities regulator websites reached 11%.

Informal information still carries considerable influence. Friends, family and colleagues were consulted by 34% of buyers. Social media influencers reached 21%, while another 19% used advice from people on social media or online forums.

Advertising grew at the same time. More than half recalled seeing crypto promotion, and roughly three in ten remembered platform bonuses, referral rewards or personalities promoting a particular trading venue. Registered firms, advisors and regulators are therefore competing for investor attention inside a market where promotional messages can arrive faster than formal guidance.

Centralized platforms are still the main commercial on-ramp. Their advantage comes from familiar onboarding, Canadian payment connections, custody and a simpler buying experience. Registration can add confidence, especially as more customers learn to check whether a platform is authorized.

The Canadian registrations obtained by global platforms operating in Canada such as Coinbase and Kraken are driving competition and vying for trust and distribution. Registration subjects a platform to Canadian requirements, but it doesn't remove investment, custody, fraud or company risk.

49% of owners keep assets on the platform where they bought them. For many customers, the trading venue is also their custodian, account interface, source of product information and first point of contact when a withdrawal fails.

Fifteen percent of centralized platform users reported losing money through a scam, fraud or hacking incident. Among the smaller group reporting hacking losses, 31% said at least $60,000 was lost. That subgroup is limited, but the reported amounts show how quickly a retail platform problem can become a serious household loss.

New Products Raise The Operating Stakes

Stablecoin payment infrastructure and tokenized RWA infrastructure show where Canadian demand may coalesce next. The OSC results confirm national investor numbers behind two channels that are already advancing through regulated products, settlement systems and new forms of asset ownership.

The operating layer is also becoming easier to see. VersaBank and QCAD connect a Canadian dollar stablecoin to regulated banking infrastructure, while tokenized fund operations are expanding into subscriptions, redemptions, investor records, pricing and settlement. The survey helps show whether Canadian investors are becoming ready for the products that this infrastructure could support.

Stablecoin awareness reached 34%, and 11% of Canadians said they had held or used one during the previous year. Owners weren't simply leaving them untouched. Eighty-nine percent had used them for at least one activity.

Trading and cash conversion remained the leading uses, but stablecoins were also used for yield, purchases and international transfers. The 20% international transfer rate gives payment providers and fintechs a practical customer problem to pursue, particularly where traditional cross border transfers remain expensive or slow.

All good and well, but there's an understanding gap that hasn't kept pace with product use. Earlier FCAC research found low knowledge of stablecoin backing, regulation and consumer protection. The OSC survey adds a more current picture of how owners are actually using them.

Tokenized real world assets start from a smaller awareness base. Only 24% had heard of the category. Yet 74% of that group said they would consider investing if the product were available through their bank or investment firm.  So, investors may be more receptive to tokenized government bonds, money market funds and similar products when the account, institution and reporting relationship are already familiar.

For fintech builders, issuing the token is only one part of the market. Banks, dealers and asset managers also need custody, identity checks, ownership records, compliance tools and settlement. Those systems must work across conventional accounts and blockchain networks.

For financial institutions, existing distribution could be more valuable than the underlying token technology. A bank or investment firm already has customers, funded accounts, advisory relationships and compliance systems. If tokenized products gain traction, those assets may enter through familiar financial channels rather than separate crypto accounts.

Talking Point

As crypto ownership rises, will Canadians turn first to an advisor, a registered crypto platform or their bank?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Can Canadian Credit Unions Share A Digital Asset Future?

July 28, 2026 | NCFA Question | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Banking And Credit, Payments And Money Movement

NCFA Intelligence that shapes what’s next

Last Updated: July 28, 2026

Status: Emerging

Organizations: Credit Union Digital Asset Task Force, St. Cloud Financial Credit Union, Amanda Wick, World Council of Credit Unions, National Digital Banking Working Group, Central 1, Large Credit Union Coalition, Payments Canada, Stablecore, Curql, TruStage, CrossState Credit Union Association, Metallicus, Q2, Jack Henry, Coinbax, NCUA

Shared Diligence Before Shared Digital Asset Products

Amanda Wick’s announcement of a new Credit Union Digital Asset Task Force raises a timely question for Canadian credit unions and digital assets.

The U.S. initiative is led by Chase Larson, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer at St. Cloud Financial Credit Union. It is designed to help credit union boards and executives understand stablecoins, tokenization, crypto assets, regulation, infrastructure and risk.

Starting with education and coordination makes sense. Credit union leaders need a practical way to compare the member value, operating costs and regulatory responsibilities before deciding whether a digital asset service belongs in their strategy.

Other developments show how quickly the discussion is advancing. Credit unions are joining early access programs, testing infrastructure through association cohorts, assessing platform integrations and considering stablecoin and tokenized deposit services.

The World Council of Credit Unions has also placed digital money on the cooperative finance agenda. Its July 2026 stablecoin paper examines potential effects on deposits, payments, member relationships and the future role of credit unions.

Canada already has groups that coordinate technology procurement, common architecture, digital identity and payments modernization. The practical question is whether those collaborative models should now be used to study digital assets together.

Strategic Takeaway
Canadian credit unions already have collaboration models that could support shared digital asset research, vendor assessment and controlled testing. What they still need is an agreed member or operating problem to solve and a regulatory route that works across federal and provincial responsibilities. Shared diligence is the most practical place to begin.

  • Canadian credit unions already collaborate on major technology purchases, common architecture and payments infrastructure (confirmed foundation)
  • Credit unions account for approximately $764 billion of the $771.3 billion captured in Canada’s community finance market baseline (economic scale)
  • Shared research, procurement and governance could reduce repeated legal, security and technology work (transferable capability)
  • Credit union initiatives now cover education, early access, sandbox testing, stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody and platform integration (international progress)
  • Existing credit union groups could evaluate the market without creating another organization (Canadian opportunity)
  • Key Questions: Deposit protection, reserves, custody, liquidity, redemptions, governance and member protection require clear treatment

How Canadian Credit Unions Already Work Together

Canada’s strongest foundation isn’t a blockchain pilot. It is the way credit unions already collaborate on expensive technology, procurement, architecture and national infrastructure.

Some of those capabilities could transfer directly to digital asset work. Others are closely related. Together, they show that institutions can share complex diligence while retaining control over contracts, governance and implementation.

The National Digital Banking Working Group coordinated vendor review, procurement, migration planning and implementation after Central 1 announced its digital banking transition. Its public membership page listed 59 institutions, while 37 selected Intellect Design Arena’s eMACH.ai platform.

This was more than a discussion forum. Participating institutions pooled expertise and bargaining power, then made their own implementation decisions. A digital asset initiative could follow the same model without requiring every credit union to adopt the same product.

The Large Credit Union Coalition offers another example. Its work has included artificial intelligence, digital identity, common architecture, collective purchasing and payments modernization.

Digital identity, architecture and collective purchasing could support the evaluation of wallet providers, custodians, transaction monitoring systems and settlement networks. The same structure could help institutions compare risks, costs and member use cases.

Payments coordination is already familiar. Central 1 and the other Group Clearer centrals created the Payments Modernization Advisory Group with 12 credit unions to represent sector requirements during national infrastructure development.

That experience is relevant because stablecoins and tokenized deposits would need to interact with clearing, settlement, liquidity, fraud controls and account infrastructure. Many of those questions also also relevant to Canada’s Real Time Rail development.

The opening of Payments Canada membership creates another connection. Credit unions, payment service providers, fintechs, foreign exchange firms and digital asset companies are gaining a wider role in national payment infrastructure. NCFA’s analysis of Canada’s financial infrastructure shows how access, licensing and participation are evolving.

Consumer data access is important too. Canada’s open banking framework is creating new expectations around consent, identity, liability and financial service integration. Digital asset products offered through regulated institutions would need to fit within that same trust environment.

The size of the sector makes this more than a technology discussion. The Canadian community finance market baseline identified 306 credit unions holding approximately $764 billion of the $771.3 billion in total assets included in the dataset.

The SVX report doesn’t examine stablecoins or digital assets. Its relevance is the amount of member and community capital already managed through cooperative institutions. Changes to deposits, payments and settlement infrastructure could therefore have material consequences for credit unions.

Canada isn’t starting with an empty page. Credit unions already know how to organize expertise, negotiate together, coordinate architecture and represent shared interests.

The next step is deciding whether digital assets deserve a place within that existing collaborative work.

How Other Credit Unions Are Approaching Digital Assets

No common single operating model has emerged. Credit unions and their service organizations are taking different approaches based on regulation, member needs, internal capability and available partners.

Some initiatives begin with education and advocacy. Others involve early access, sandbox testing, planned products, core integrations or regulatory development. These examples offer reference points for Canada rather than a ready made plan.

Market Evidence

Click each to expand

1. A U.S. Task Force Starts With Executive Education United States

Emerging Coordination

Amanda Wick announced a Credit Union Digital Asset Task Force led by Chase Larson, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer at St. Cloud Financial Credit Union.

  • Its scope includes stablecoins, crypto assets, tokenization, regulation, infrastructure and risk.
  • The intended audience includes credit union boards and executives.
  • The initial focus is practical education and shared understanding.
  • The model gives leaders a way to compare developments before making product decisions.

The initiative brings digital assets into a sector level credit union discussion. It also provides a useful model for Canada, where an existing group could coordinate education, research and early use case assessment.

2. WOCCU Treats Stablecoins As A Cooperative Strategy Question Global

Global Strategic Framework

The World Council of Credit Unions released the first paper in a planned series examining how new forms of digital money could affect the global credit union system.

  • The first paper focuses on stablecoins and their potential effects on deposits, payments and member relationships.
  • WOCCU identifies deposit displacement, reduced payment activity and exclusion from new payment infrastructure as possible risks.
  • It calls for proportionate regulation that recognizes cooperative ownership and structure.
  • Boards and senior leaders are encouraged to treat stablecoins as a governance and planning issue.
  • Education, partnerships, shared investment and collective action are identified as possible responses.
  • Future papers are expected to examine tokenized deposits, central bank digital currencies and regulatory design.

WOCCU isn’t calling on every credit union to issue a stablecoin. It is asking whether cooperative institutions have the authority, flexibility and readiness to participate as payment and deposit infrastructure changes.

3. Named Credit Unions Enter Early Access United States

Early Access

Stablecore, Circuit and Curql launched an early access program involving RBFCU, Stanford Federal Credit Union, La Capitol Federal Credit Union and other institutions representing about US$25 billion in combined assets.

  • The program covers stablecoin payments and tokenized deposits.
  • It also includes digital asset accounts, Bitcoin access, staking, compliance and member education.
  • Participating institutions can examine business, technology and compliance requirements together.
  • The structure allows credit unions to learn from a shared program while making their own decisions.

This initiative has progressed beyond general education. Named credit unions are evaluating defined services through an organized early access program.

4. TruStage Plans A Credit Union Stablecoin United States

Planned Product

TruStage announced plans for TruStage Stablecoin, or TSDA, as a fully reserved U.S. dollar stablecoin for community based financial institutions.

  • TruStage says it works with more than 93% of over 4,300 U.S. credit unions.
  • Those institutions collectively hold more than US$2 trillion in assets.
  • Proposed uses include continuous money movement and faster settlement.
  • The distribution model would use an established credit union service provider.

TSDA combines a named product, a large credit union network and a defined payment use case. It represents one of the more developed cooperative stablecoin strategies.

5. CrossState Brings 50 Credit Unions Into One Program United States

Sandbox And Pilot Preparation

CrossState Credit Union Association and Metallicus launched Innovation Program 2.0 with an initial cohort of 50 credit unions in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  • The program covers stablecoins, digital identity, blockchain infrastructure and faster payments.
  • It combines executive education with sandbox testing.
  • Participants can compare use cases, controls and vendors through an association structure.
  • Credit unions can explore the technology without each institution building its own testing environment.

This may be one of the most relevant models for Canada. Institutions can learn and test together without requiring every participant to become an issuer or infrastructure operator.

6. Q2 Connects Digital Asset Tools To Banking Platforms United States

Available Infrastructure

Q2 partnered with Stablecore to connect stablecoins, tokenized deposits and digital asset accounts with infrastructure already used by banks and credit unions.

  • Institutions can access the capabilities through Q2 Innovation Studio.
  • The model reduces the need to assemble a separate technology stack.
  • Amarillo National Bank and Bank of Utah were named as initial customers.
  • The partnership gives other financial institutions a route to assess similar services.

This approach brings digital asset capabilities into existing banking technology rather than asking institutions to build a separate platform.

7. Coinbax Opens A Route Into Jack Henry Systems United States

Integration Access

Coinbax joined the Jack Henry Fintech Integration Network to connect stablecoin payment infrastructure with Jack Henry core and digital banking platforms.

  • Jack Henry technology serves more than 7,400 banks and credit unions.
  • Coinbax lists programmable escrow, stablecoin payments, cross border transfers, payouts and core reconciliation as use cases.
  • The network provides integration resources and a route to institutional deployment.
  • Finex Credit Union has participated as a design partner.

The model shows how a credit union could access digital asset infrastructure through technology relationships it already understands.

8. NCUA Is Developing A Credit Union Stablecoin Rulebook United States

Proposed Regulatory Framework

The National Credit Union Administration has proposed rules for payment stablecoin issuers affiliated with federally insured credit unions.

  • The framework covers applications, licensing and regulatory review.
  • It would govern how federally insured credit unions may invest in issuer subsidiaries.
  • Proposed standards address reserves, redemption, operations, governance and risk management.
  • Related proposals cover customer identification and Bank Secrecy Act duties.
  • NCUA would supervise qualifying credit union subsidiaries.

The proposals give U.S. credit unions a clearer view of how ownership, issuance and supervision could work.

Canada doesn’t yet have a comparable credit union framework connecting federal stablecoin requirements with provincial regulation, deposit protection and cooperative ownership. NCFA’s stablecoin regulatory guide tracks the federal framework and the decisions still ahead.

What Credit Union Groups Could Do Next

The evidence identifies several ways credit union associations, centrals and collaborative groups could investigate digital assets while controlling cost and risk.

Each option addresses a different problem. Research and testing can be shared, while boards retain responsibility for product approval, compliance, member communication and operations.

Shared research and regulatory analysis could reduce repeated legal, policy and vendor work. A group could map federal and provincial requirements, compare stablecoins with tokenized deposits and examine deposit protection, custody, reserves and redemptions. That work would remain useful even if no product followed.

Coordinated policy engagement could help regulators understand how cooperative ownership, provincial supervision and deposit protection differ from commercial bank and nonbank issuer models. Credit unions may need to take part in regulatory design before deciding whether to offer a service.

Controlled testing could let institutions examine technology, controls and use cases before making production commitments. Shared sandbox work could cover wallet verification, settlement, transaction monitoring, reconciliation, vendor performance and incident recovery.

Cross border business payments may offer one of the clearest commercial tests. Credit unions could retain the member relationship and Canadian dollar account while using regulated digital settlement infrastructure behind the scenes. Foreign exchange, sanctions, wallet ownership, liquidity and redemption would still require strong controls.

See: Are Tokenized RWAs Legal And Becoming Market Infrastructure?

Tokenized deposits may fit the credit union model better than a separate stablecoin. A tokenized deposit could remain a claim on a regulated institution rather than becoming a separate private currency. Canada would still need clarity on ownership, settlement finality, interoperability and provincial deposit insurance.

Shared custody and wallet infrastructure could give smaller institutions access to security and compliance capabilities they couldn’t justify independently. The trade off is concentration risk. One vendor failure could affect several institutions, making asset segregation, recovery and liability allocation critical.

Identity and compliance tools may offer a lower risk starting point. Common wallet verification, member authentication, sanctions screening and transaction monitoring could support future payment or custody services without creating immediate issuance or balance sheet exposure.

Business settlement and treasury pilots could test supplier payments, commercial settlement, liquidity management or transfers between institutions. These controlled business uses may have clearer operating value than retail crypto trading.

Shared stablecoin infrastructure would require the greatest level of coordination. Participants would need to agree on reserves, redemption, governance, technology, liquidity, fees, branding and loss allocation. The international examples show how the model could work, but Canada doesn’t need to begin there.

Waiting is also a valid decision. A joint review may find that member demand is weak, costs are too high, regulations remain incomplete or existing payment systems solve the same problem with less risk.

A Practical Starting Point
An existing credit union group could map the rules, rank the use cases, compare vendors and identify one or two controlled tests. Its job would be to determine whether a shared service is justified, not to begin with a stablecoin or blockchain product already selected.

Each option should pass five tests:

  • What member or operating problem would it solve?
  • What work can participating institutions share?
  • What responsibility must remain with each credit union?
  • What evidence would justify further investment?
  • What evidence would support waiting or stopping?

See: How Is Crypto Custody Regulation Changing?

Deposit protection remains one of the largest questions. Members need to know whether a tokenized deposit would receive the same provincial protection as funds in an ordinary account. Institutions also need clarity on reserve ownership, liquidity and redemptions during stress.

Custody raises a different set of issues. Who controls the keys? Are assets legally separated if a vendor fails? Who carries the loss when funds go to the wrong wallet? How does a member recover access after fraud, death or lost credentials?

AML controls wouldn’t end at onboarding. Institutions would need to verify wallet ownership, monitor transactions, screen counterparties and decide how to handle transfers involving self hosted wallets.

Shared governance may prove harder than the technology. Participants would need rules for choosing vendors and networks, changing operating standards, setting fees and allocating losses when an institution or service provider fails.

The Bottom Line

Current evidence doesn’t support rushing into a shared Canadian credit union digital asset product. It does support sharing the work required to understand whether one could solve a real problem.

Canadian credit unions already collaborate on technology, architecture, procurement and payments infrastructure. They also manage approximately $764 billion within the country’s community finance baseline. That gives the sector both the capability and the economic reason to pay attention.

Internationally, cooperative institutions are progressing through education, advocacy, early access, sandbox testing, platform integration, planned stablecoins and regulatory development. None offers a complete Canadian template.

See: Are Stablecoins Becoming Payment Infrastructure?

The conversation has already begun internationally. Canada’s next decision is whether credit unions build on the collaboration they already have, identify the use cases that could create real member value and help define the market before others define it for them.

Do you agree the evidence supports this answer?

Click Agree or Disagree. Your vote is recorded anonymously and aggregate results are tracked.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Canadian credit unions currently issuing stablecoins?

No shared Canadian credit union stablecoin has been publicly announced. The more immediate opportunity is coordinated research into member demand, regulation, infrastructure and risk.

What is a tokenized deposit?

A tokenized deposit is a digital representation of a deposit held with a regulated financial institution. Unlike a separate stablecoin, it may remain a direct claim on the institution, although legal treatment, settlement and deposit protection must be clearly defined.

Why would credit unions work together on digital assets?

Shared work could lower the cost of legal analysis, vendor assessment, cybersecurity review, compliance design and controlled testing. Each credit union could still decide independently whether to offer a product.

Could stablecoins reduce credit union deposits?

They could affect deposit and payment relationships if members begin holding or transferring more value through external digital money platforms. The outcome would depend on adoption, regulation, product design and whether credit unions participate directly.

What is the most practical first step for Canada?

An existing credit union association, central or working group could coordinate education, regulatory analysis, use case ranking and limited testing before institutions commit to a shared product or infrastructure provider.

Explore Related Intelligence


NCFA Canada

The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem providing education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities to thousands of members. NCFA works with industry, government, partners and affiliates to support a competitive and innovative fintech and funding sector in Canada. Join Canada’s Fintech and Funding Community or learn more at NCFA Canada.

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

Inside Coinbase Canada’s Derivatives And Platform Expansion

July 27, 2026 | NCFA Companies On The Move | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Wealth Investing And Trading, Competition And Market Structure

AI Image – Multiple financial asset streams converging through a unified everything exchange

Coinbase Canada’s Everything Exchange Ambition

Parent Founded2012
Canada Launch2023
Parent FoundersBrian Armstrong and Fred Ehrsam
Company StageMarket Expansion

Coinbase is preparing to offer crypto derivatives to Canadian permitted clients, the first near term product in a much larger Canadian platform plan. In a Coinbase Canada interview, chief executive Eric Richmond said Coinbase Financial Markets had received an international exemption and expected the product to go live within weeks. He also wants Coinbase Canada to become a CIRO dealer in early 2027.

The derivatives aren’t live yet, and the first release isn’t intended for the general retail market. Stocks, ETFs and prediction markets are also part of Coinbase’s Canadian ambition, but no complete launch date has been announced. This profile separates what Canadians can use today from the approvals, products and customer adoption Coinbase still needs to turn a crypto account into a wider investment platform.

What Coinbase Canada Offers And What Comes Next

Canadians can already use Coinbase for spot crypto trading, Advanced trading tools, Interac e Transfer and electronic funds transfer deposits, PayPal purchases and eligible USDC rewards. The Coinbase Canada platform operates as a restricted dealer across every province and territory and as a registered FINTRAC money services business. Richmond said it lists more than 200 crypto assets.

The first expansion is narrower than the larger platform pitch. Coinbase Financial Markets expects to offer derivatives through an international exemption within weeks, beginning with permitted clients. The OSC permitted client definition includes institutions and certain financially sophisticated clients. It doesn’t include every Coinbase Canada customer.

Richmond’s next target is early 2027 membership in the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization. The CIRO crypto dealer requirements cover capital, conduct, custody, operations and supervision. Approval would give Coinbase Canada a more permanent dealer base than its current restricted dealer registration, although it wouldn’t approve every future product automatically.

The ambition goes well beyond derivatives. Richmond has described a Canadian app spanning crypto, cash, stocks, ETFs and prediction markets. The Coinbase tokenized stock plan separately refers to customers outside the United States, but that wording doesn’t confirm Canadian availability. No complete Canadian launch date has been published for stocks, ETFs or prediction markets.

Why The Canadian Plan Needs Several Approvals

Coinbase can’t bring every global product into Canada under one registration. Its restricted dealer status supports the crypto trading business already operating here. Derivatives would come through a separate Coinbase affiliate and an exemption for permitted clients. Stocks and ETFs need securities dealer permissions, while prediction markets could face different requirements depending on the contracts and how they’re offered.

That puts regulation inside the product plan. Coinbase signed an enhanced preregistration undertaking in March 2023, launched its Canadian service with Interac access that August and completed its Coinbase Canada registration in April 2024. It became the first international exchange registered as a restricted dealer in Canada. It’s now adding products in the order its permissions allow instead of treating the global catalogue as one Canadian launch.

CIRO membership sits in the middle of that plan. Canada has been directing crypto trading platforms toward investment dealer registration and CIRO membership, while CIRO’s 2026 custody framework adds specific expectations for digital and tokenized assets. Membership wouldn’t approve every future product on its own. It would give Coinbase Canada a stronger dealer base from which to apply.

Founders and operators will recognize the build underneath the app. One customer interface may rely on several legal entities, registrations and product approvals. The front end can feel simple even when custody, execution, market access, capital and customer protection sit in separate operating lanes.

Why Coinbase Wants More Than Spot Trading

Coinbase Global’s first quarter figures explain why the company wants more ways to earn from each account. Coinbase Global spot volume fell 50% from a year earlier to US$202 billion, while monthly transacting users declined 15% to 8.2 million. Net revenue was US$1.3 billion, and the company recorded a US$394 million net loss. Those are global Coinbase figures, not Coinbase Canada results.

Other products are already helping to carry more of the business. Coinbase reported more than US$200 million in annualized retail derivatives revenue, while prediction markets reached US$100 million in annualized revenue during March. Its 2025 purchase of Deribit added a large crypto options business, and subscription and services produced US$583.5 million of first quarter net revenue. A customer using several products can remain valuable even when spot trading cools.

Canada is already a serious platform contest. Wealthsimple combines stocks, ETFs, crypto, cash accounts and other financial products inside one app. Robinhood entered Canada in June by buying WonderFi, giving it Bitbuy, Coinsquare, approximately 300,000 funded customers and regulated local infrastructure. Robinhood’s WonderFi purchase showed what that operating base was worth before the transaction closed. Kraken, Shakepay, NDAX and other registered platforms compete for crypto customers, while banks and established brokerages already control much of the Canadian investment relationship.

Coinbase brings a global exchange, custody, stablecoin and derivatives stack to that contest. Its challenge is local distribution. Canadians need a reason to transfer cash and assets, accept a new fee structure and keep several parts of their financial lives in the same account. Product breadth helps, but pricing, trust, tax reporting, execution quality and the limits attached to each registration will decide whether the app becomes a primary account or another trading venue.

What Makes Coinbase Canada Different In Summer 2026

Coinbase enters this Canadian stage with infrastructure a local exchange would struggle to replicate. Deribit adds options depth, Coinbase Financial Markets provides a regulated derivatives route, and USDC supports trading and rewards. The public parent also ended March with US$10.4 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable investments.

None of that makes Canadian adoption automatic. The derivatives release still has to launch, attract permitted clients and work well. CIRO membership remains a target, while stocks, ETFs, prediction markets and tokenized equities still need confirmed Canadian availability. Coinbase doesn’t publish Canadian customers, assets, revenue or market share, so public figures can’t yet show how large the local business has become.

The Company Intelligence Snapshot below follows the company, capital, product and regulatory decisions that brought Coinbase to this Canadian expansion stage.

NCFA Company Intelligence Snapshot

Coinbase Canada

The Canadian operating business, shown with the Coinbase Global history and infrastructure behind its expansion
Last updated Jul 27, 2026

Company At A Glance

Parent FoundedCoinbase was founded in 2012 by Brian Armstrong and Fred Ehrsam
Parent StatusCoinbase Global is listed on Nasdaq under COIN
Canadian EntityCoinbase Canada, Inc., incorporated in British Columbia
Canadian StatusRestricted dealer in all provinces and territories; FINTRAC MSB M22815925
Current Canada OfferSpot crypto, Advanced trading, Interac and EFT funding, PayPal purchases and eligible USDC rewards
Near Term PlanCrypto derivatives for Canadian permitted clients through Coinbase Financial Markets
Regulatory TargetCIRO dealer membership in early 2027, according to the Canadian chief executive
Global Q1 RevenueUS$1.3B net revenue; Coinbase does not disclose Canadian revenue
Global Platform AssetsUS$294B at Mar 31, 2026; Canadian assets are not disclosed
Global Users8.2M monthly transacting users in Q1 2026; Canadian users are not disclosed
Business ModelTransaction revenue plus subscription and services revenue from stablecoins, custody, staking, financing and memberships
Canadian CompetitionWealthsimple, Robinhood through WonderFi, Kraken, Shakepay, NDAX and established brokerages
Milestones
Select a milestone to follow how Coinbase built a public crypto platform and entered its next Canadian market stage
Milestone 1

Coinbase Starts With A Simple Bitcoin Account (2012)

Brian Armstrong and Fred Ehrsam founded Coinbase in 2012 to make it easier for people to buy, sell, store and transfer Bitcoin. The customer account became the base for a much larger crypto business.

Company

CoinbaseA US founded crypto platform

Stage

FormationA retail entry point into Bitcoin

Capital

Venture BackedPrivate funding supports exchange and custody infrastructure

Markets

United StatesCrypto access before international expansion

Customers

Retail UsersPeople seeking a simpler way to access Bitcoin

Competition

Early ExchangesTrust, payments and ease of use are central differentiators

Additional Company Data

  • Coinbase begins with a hosted customer account rather than a self custody only product
  • Trading, custody and fiat access develop around the same customer relationship
  • Regulatory engagement becomes a core operating requirement as the platform grows
  • The company later adds institutional and developer businesses alongside retail

Why This Milestone Matters

The original account created the distribution base Coinbase still uses. New products can be offered where customers already hold assets and complete identity checks, reducing the work required to introduce another financial service.

Four useful ways to place Coinbase Canada’s plan inside the market it’s entering.

Frequently Asked Questions About Coinbase Canada

Is Coinbase regulated in Canada?
Yes. Coinbase Canada, Inc. is registered as a restricted dealer across Canada and as a money services business with FINTRAC. Restricted dealer registration is not the same as CIRO dealer membership, which the Canadian chief executive says the company is targeting for early 2027.
Is Coinbase launching crypto derivatives in Canada?
Coinbase Canada chief executive Eric Richmond said in July 2026 that Coinbase Financial Markets expected to offer derivatives to Canadian permitted clients within weeks. The product had not yet launched when this profile was verified on July 27.
Who will be able to use the Canadian derivatives product?
The first release is intended for permitted clients, a Canadian regulatory category that includes institutions and certain financially sophisticated clients. Coinbase has not announced general retail availability.
Can Canadians trade stocks and ETFs on Coinbase?
Coinbase has described stocks and ETFs as part of its Canadian Everything Exchange ambition, but it has not announced a complete Canadian launch date. A global Coinbase announcement for non US tokenized stocks should not be treated as confirmation that the product is approved or available in Canada.
Will Coinbase offer prediction markets in Canada?
Prediction markets are part of the stated Canadian platform plan, but Coinbase has not announced a Canadian launch date or the legal and regulatory structure it would use. Availability would depend on the contracts offered and Canadian approvals.
What does Coinbase currently offer Canadians?
The current Canadian platform offers spot crypto trading, Advanced trading tools, Interac e Transfer and electronic funds transfer funding, PayPal purchases and eligible USDC rewards. Product availability and reward rates can change.
How many Canadian customers does Coinbase have?
Coinbase does not publish a current Canadian customer count. Its public filings report global users, trading volume, assets and revenue, but those figures should not be presented as Coinbase Canada results.
How does Coinbase make money?
Coinbase Global earns transaction revenue from trading and subscription and services revenue from products including stablecoins, custody, staking, financing and memberships. It does not disclose the revenue or product mix of Coinbase Canada separately.
Who competes with Coinbase in Canada?
Its direct crypto competitors include Robinhood through Bitbuy and Coinsquare, Kraken, Shakepay, NDAX and other registered platforms. Its wider platform ambition also places it against Wealthsimple, established brokerages and financial institutions that already offer Canadian investment accounts.
Is Coinbase Canada part of Coinbase Global?
Yes. Coinbase Canada, Inc. is the Canadian operating entity within Coinbase Global. Coinbase Global is the Nasdaq listed parent. Parent company financial results and global user figures are not the same as Canadian results.

Coinbase Global figures are identified separately from Coinbase Canada information. Planned products, launch timing and regulatory targets may change. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Why Are Crypto Exchanges Shutting Down in 2026?

July 27, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Competition And Market Structure, Risk Compliance And Regtech

AI Image – Crypto exchanges closing amid regulatory and liquidity pressure

Three Closures Reveal More Than A Bear Market

On July 26, 2026, BitMart began winding down its trading platform. Three days earlier, BitMEX announced its closure after eleven years. AscendEX had already stopped operating on July 1.

Three exchange closures announced or underway inside one month deserve more than a roundup. They raise a harder question around the 2026 bear market. Is it breaking the centralized exchange model, or exposing platforms that had already lost the trading activity, regulatory access or financial capacity needed to keep going?

The public record doesn't support one cause for all three.

  • AscendEX tied its closure to the European Union's Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation, along with financial and operating pressures
  • BitMart cited its operating conditions, the market environment and future strategy without naming a specific financial or regulatory event
  • BitMEX said its board acted after a strategic review and separately stated that assets exceeded liabilities. Their timing is shared, but their disclosed circumstances aren't

Lower Volume Hits Unevenly

The bear market is real, and it strikes at the first line of exchange economics. Trading fees rise and fall with activity. CoinGecko found that spot volume across the ten largest centralized exchanges fell 39.1% in the first quarter of 2026. Its second quarter report recorded a further 27.9% decline to US$1.95 trillion. Perpetual futures held up better, although volume still fell 10% from the prior quarter.

The numbers explain the pressure. They don't explain which exchange closes. The declines among leading spot venues ranged from 5% to 56% in the second quarter, while Binance increased its share to 38.7%. A weak market can therefore strengthen the largest venue at the same time it makes a smaller one uneconomic.

BitMEX is the clearest example. It created the perpetual swap product that became central to crypto trading, yet product invention didn't preserve its liquidity. Kaiko data reported by Reuters put BitMEX below 0.01% market share with roughly US$400,000 in daily volume when the closure was announced. Meanwhile, the ten largest centralized perpetual exchanges still processed US$12.7 trillion in the second quarter. The market BitMEX helped create remained huge, while its position inside it had collapsed.

Liquidity has its own impact. Traders prefer deeper order books, tighter spreads and reliable execution. Market makers follow trading activity, then their capital improves execution and attracts more traders. Once that cycle runs in reverse, adding another token, staking programme or interface may not repair the core business.

Licensing And Onchain Trading Tighten The Squeeze

Regulation is decisive when it controls market access. Under the MiCA transition rule, a crypto asset service provider that wasn't authorized by the applicable deadline had to stop serving the market until it received authorization. That deadline arrived on July 1, the same day AscendEX ceased operations.

Authorization also carries an operating load. MiCA requires prudential safeguards, governance, internal controls, business continuity planning and security documentation. ESMA's current custody review reaches into key storage, transaction controls, incident response and service provider dependencies. The cost continues after authorization because firms need people, systems and capital while trading revenue can fall quickly.

Regulation is therefore a filter and one part of the explanation. It directly affected AscendEX. Neither BitMEX nor BitMart identified licensing as the cause of its closure. Tighter rules can force a decision or raise the cost of staying open, while weak economics determine how much room a platform has to absorb that cost. NCFA's comparison of MiCA and UK rules shows why regulation can favour companies with stronger governance and compliance infrastructure.

Onchain exchanges are also taking a larger piece of derivatives trading. CoinGecko's perpetuals data shows that the top decentralized venues averaged US$611.6 billion in monthly volume during the first four months of 2026, up from US$531.7 billion in 2025. Their share of open interest reached 13.5% by the end of April, compared with 3.6% at the start of 2025.

Still, centralized exchanges held 86.5% of open interest. Onchain competition is meaningful, especially for active derivatives traders, but it hasn't replaced the centralized model. It has given traders another place to go just as a falling market makes every lost account more expensive.

What Founders, Investors And Canadian Platforms Should Watch

The closing notices reveal almost as much through their differences as their similarities.

  • AscendEX paused automated withdrawals and said it couldn't assure customers when requests would be completed or how much would be returned
  • BitMart set a phased timetable and kept withdrawals open, but its notice didn't disclose revenue, reserves, liabilities or the specific condition that made closure necessary
  • BitMEX said assets exceeded liabilities and kept withdrawals available, while warning that thin contracts could be settled early

Customers need clear answers about whether their assets are held separately, whether reserves cover liabilities, how open positions will be priced, how quickly withdrawals will be processed and which legal entity is responsible for returning their money.

For founders, exchange businesses needs deep liquidity, active traders who keep coming back, trusted custody and permission to operate in every market it serves. New products and jurisdictions can bring in more revenue, but they also add capital, compliance, security and support costs. Those costs don't disappear when trading activity goes somewhere else.

Investors should watch market share, order book depth, active trader retention, withdrawal performance, reserve and liability reporting, market maker concentration and the status of key licences. Historical user totals can hide a much weaker current business. BitMEX's decline from an industry pioneer to less than 0.01% market share shows just how far activity can fall before an established name finally exits.

Canada uses a different regulatory framework, but the same operating questions apply. Canadian platform rules cover registration, custody and delivery requirements, while Kraken's registration shows the conditions attached to serving Canadian customers. Registration can strengthen oversight and make the rules clearer. It can't remove market, custody or company risk.

So the answer goes beyond “bear market plus regulatory pressure.” Lower prices and weaker trading cut fee revenue. Licensing determines where an exchange can legally operate. Liquidity keeps concentrating around fewer large venues, while onchain platforms compete for active traders. Custody, compliance and security remain expensive throughout. If an exchange loses trading activity, market access or customer confidence, it can run out of room even when the global crypto market remains very large.

Talking Point

When trading volume falls, which exchange numbers tell you whether a platform is temporarily quieter or losing the liquidity, trust and regulatory access it needs to remain viable?


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

Shakepay Joins Interac e Transfer Directly

July 23, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Payments And Money Movement, Digital Assets, Competition And Market Structure

AI Image – Mobile payments app with connected Canada network

Shakepay Joins Interac e Transfer Directly

On July 16, 2026, Shakepay joined Interac e Transfer as a participant. Its customers could already send and receive e Transfers. The important change is behind the product.

Direct participation gives Shakepay more control over how transfers are connected, operated and improved. It can work closer to Interac instead of relying as heavily on another financial institution to provide a service that sits at the centre of its Canadian dollar experience.

Interac says Shakepay serves more than 1.5 million Canadians. Interac e Transfer processed more than 1.6 billion transactions last year.

That makes this less about adding another payment button and more about owning a larger part of the customer relationship.

Shakepay began as a simple way to buy bitcoin. It now offers Canadian dollar balances, e Transfers, card spending, bitcoin rewards and business accounts. Joining Interac directly gives those products a stronger operating base.

Shakepay Is Building Around The Canadian Dollar

Bitcoin remains the hook, but most customers still enter Shakepay through Canadian dollars.

They fund an account, buy an asset, spend from a cash balance or withdraw money to a bank. The better Shakepay handles those steps, the more useful the account becomes before and after a crypto trade.

Its bitcoin rewards strategy follows the same logic. Customers pay merchants in Canadian dollars through established card infrastructure and earn bitcoin afterwards. Merchants don’t have to accept crypto, and customers don’t have to change how they pay.

Interac participation strengthens the other side of that model. Shakepay can connect familiar money movement with bitcoin ownership inside one account.

This is where the company’s strategy becomes more interesting.

A crypto exchange earns activity when customers trade. An everyday financial account can earn attention when they get paid, send money, shop, save or manage a business. Shakepay doesn’t need bitcoin to replace Canadian payment rails. It needs bitcoin to become more useful because those rails are built into the product.

Direct participation doesn’t guarantee faster transfers, higher limits or lower fees. Interac and Shakepay haven’t announced those changes. The value will show up in what Shakepay builds next and whether customers notice a better experience.

From Payments Canada Member To Network Participant

Shakepay became the first crypto focused company to join Payments Canada in May 2025.

That was an important credential. Payments Canada membership brought Shakepay into national payment system governance and made deeper infrastructure access possible. It didn’t connect the company automatically to every rail or network.

Interac participation is a more practical step. Shakepay is now closer to an operating service its customers already use.

  • Payments Canada membership gives Shakepay a place within the organization that owns and operates Canada’s core clearing and settlement systems
  • Interac participation gives Shakepay a direct relationship with the network behind a major customer payment service

One opens institutional access. The other can change the product.

Shakepay qualified as a FINTRAC registered money services business and a CIRO regulated investment dealer. Its dealer membership took effect in January 2025, adding national oversight of its investment operations, capital, custody and compliance.

Regulation is becoming part of the competitive stack. It takes time and money, but it also gives fintechs access to infrastructure that was once largely reserved for banks and credit unions.

Canada’s crypto market is splitting along two strategies.

Robinhood bought WonderFi and its Bitbuy and Coinsquare platforms to enter Canada with regulated trading scale. Shakepay remains independent and is extending outward from bitcoin into payments.

One strategy consolidates trading platforms under a global owner. The other tries to turn a Canadian crypto relationship into a broader financial account.

Interac participation gives Shakepay more control, but it also leaves less room to blame an intermediary when payments fail. Fraud controls, outages, customer support and account reliability now carry more strategic weight.

NCFA Perspective

Shakepay has assembled much of an everyday financial account without becoming a bank. Customers can hold Canadian dollars, move money through Interac, spend through a prepaid card and earn bitcoin rewards. Businesses can manage cash and digital assets through the same platform.

The products fit together. Now customers need to use them. More than 1.5 million registered users gives Shakepay reach, but it doesn’t show how many customers maintain balances, route recurring income or use the account every week. Those behavioural actions are beyond account registrations because they determine deposit stability, payment volume and customer lifetime value.

See:  When Does A Smart Prediction Become Insider Trading?

Direct Interac participation improves operating control and reduces reliance on intermediaries. It also gives Shakepay more freedom to design the account around payments, cash and bitcoin. The larger opportunity is to convert a crypto relationship into a primary financial relationship. That depends on whether customers trust Shakepay enough to leave money there and useful enough to return when they aren’t buying bitcoin.

Talking Point

Can Shakepay turn direct Interac access into a primary financial relationship, or will it remain the account Canadians use mainly when they want bitcoin?

NCFA Company Intelligence Snapshot

Shakepay

Canadian bitcoin platform extending into payments, cards and business financial services
Last updated Jul 23, 2026

Company At A Glance

Founded2015
Head OfficeMontreal, Quebec
FoundersJean Amiouny and Roy Breidi
Reported UsersMore than 1.5 million Canadians
OwnershipPrivately held and Canadian owned
Core ProductsBitcoin, ether, cash balances, transfers, cards and rewards
Business OfferCanadian dollar and crypto treasury accounts and transfers
RegulationCIRO investment dealer and FINTRAC registered MSB
Payments CanadaMember since May 2025
Interace Transfer participant since Jul 2026
Milestones
Select a milestone to follow Shakepay’s development from bitcoin trading into everyday finance
Milestone 1

Shakepay Starts With A Simple Bitcoin Product (2015)

Jean Amiouny and Roy Breidi founded Shakepay in Montreal. The early product gave Canadians a simpler way to buy and sell bitcoin using Canadian dollars.

Company

ShakepayPrivately held Canadian bitcoin company

Stage

LaunchA focused product enters the Canadian market

Capital

Founder BuiltEarly financing details weren’t publicly disclosed

Markets

CanadaCanadian dollar access supports local adoption

Customers

First Time BuyersEase of use lowers the entry barrier

Competition

Local SimplicityThe product is built around Canadian funding needs

Additional Company Data

  • Shakepay was founded in Montreal in 2015
  • Jean Amiouny serves as chief executive officer
  • The initial offer focused on bitcoin access for Canadians
  • The company later added ether and Canadian dollar account features

Why This Milestone Matters

Shakepay began with one clear job: make buying bitcoin easier in Canada. That focus built the customer base it is now trying to extend into payments.

Frequently Asked Questions About Shakepay And Interac e Transfer

What changed for Shakepay?
Shakepay became a direct participant in Interac e Transfer. Customers already had access to e Transfers, but Shakepay now has more control over how the service is connected and operated.
Is Shakepay owned by WonderFi or Robinhood?
No. WonderFi owned Bitbuy and Coinsquare and was acquired by Robinhood. Shakepay is a separate privately held Canadian company.
How is this different from joining Payments Canada?
Payments Canada membership brought Shakepay into national payment governance and created eligibility for deeper access. Interac participation connects it directly with a specific operating network.
Does Interac e Transfer send bitcoin?
No. Interac e Transfer moves Canadian dollars. Shakepay customers can then hold, spend, withdraw or convert those funds into supported digital assets.
Does direct participation make Shakepay a bank?
No. Shakepay remains a CIRO regulated investment dealer and FINTRAC registered money services business.

Information notice: Company and network figures are identified and attributed where applicable. Product availability, operating features and regulatory treatment may change after the stated update date. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.


National Crowdfunding and Fintech Association of CanadaThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: [www.ncfacanada.org](http://www.ncfacanada.org)

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

GTN And Payward Take xStocks Into Global Equity Markets

July 22, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Digital Assets, Wealth Investing And Trading

Global finance and tokenized securities with a digital network and skyline

GTN Connects xStocks With More National Markets

On July 22, 2026, GTN and Payward partnered to take xStocks beyond U.S. equities. Hong Kong listed shares come first. Payward expects UK, European and South Korean assets to follow.

GTN will execute trades in the underlying shares, hold them in custody and maintain the records connecting those assets with the tokens in circulation. Its network reaches more than 90 markets, giving Payward access to established brokerage and custody relationships in each country it enters.

Every xStock still starts with a conventional market transaction. A broker buys the referenced share or exchange traded fund, a custodian holds it and Backed Assets (JE) Limited issues the matching token. Redemption reverses the process.

The token can then trade through exchanges, wallets and decentralized applications, including when the underlying stock market is closed. However, that flexibility creates a pricing risk. When the share isn’t trading and direct creation or redemption is unavailable, market makers have to keep the token reasonably close to the underlying asset.

The GTN arrangement is live, although access won’t arrive everywhere at once. Payward says Hong Kong products will begin appearing this week. GTN can distribute xStocks to institutional clients only after securing the required licences.

Payward Can Sell The Same Product Through Competitors

Kraken launched xStocks with 60 U.S. stocks and ETFs in June 2025. Unlike a stock balance held inside one brokerage account, an xStock can be withdrawn to a personal wallet and transferred to another supporting platform.

Since then, Payward has added exchanges, wallets, blockchains and professional trading firms. In July 2026, OKX launched more than 40 xStocks for eligible users across several international regions.

OKX competes directly with Kraken. Supplying the same product to a rival exchange shows that Payward wants wide distribution, even when another company owns the customer relationship.

The products now do more than spot trading. Kraken Pro accepts selected xStocks as collateral for eligible margin and futures positions. Professional firms can connect directly to issuance and redemption, while separate perpetual futures provide leveraged exposure to tokenized equity prices.

Payward gained control of the product developer when it acquired Backed Finance. The deal was announced in December 2025 and completed in January 2026.

A planned gateway with Nasdaq could add a second type of product. Current xStocks are certificates created by an unrelated third party. By contrast, Nasdaq intends its proposed equity tokens to involve the public company and preserve the rights attached to the actual security.

Payward could eventually distribute both types through connected services. Investors will need a clear answer on whether each token represents a share, tracks a share or provides derivative exposure to its price.

An xStock Tracks A Share But Doesn’t Make You A Shareholder

Backed Assets (JE) Limited, a Jersey special purpose vehicle, issues the existing xStocks. Legally, the products are bearer debt instruments classified as tracker certificates.

The holder receives economic exposure to a stock or ETF but doesn’t own the referenced company’s shares. That means no voting rights, direct shareholder information rights or residual claim against the company.

The issuer reinvests dividends received on the underlying shares, net of applicable taxes, and adjusts token balances to reflect the additional holdings. It handles stock splits and reverse splits through similar balance changes.

xStocks says dedicated collateral accounts hold the corresponding security for each product. After an issuer default, an independent security agent can take control of those accounts and distribute proceeds under the legal documents.

That protection is useful, but it doesn’t put the holder in the same position as a shareholder. Recovery may come through cash from liquidated collateral rather than delivery of the shares. Custodian failure, broker failure, legal disputes or operating problems could also delay or reduce the amount recovered.

The difference can be seen in Figure’s blockchain common stock. Figure issued company equity through a public securities process. An xStock is a separate certificate tied to a share held elsewhere.

Who Is Competing And How Their Models Differ

GTN and Payward say xStocks now has more than 500 assets, nearly 200,000 holders and more than US$35 billion in transaction volume. These are company reported figures. Trading volume isn’t the same as the value of the tokens currently outstanding, and the public catalogue may not show every asset counted across venues and blockchain networks.

Companies are approaching tokenized equities from several directions.

xStocks uses common token contracts that can circulate through Kraken, third party exchanges, wallets and blockchain applications. Wide distribution is its advantage. The current products don’t provide direct shareholder rights.

Ondo Global Markets offers a large catalogue of tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs through blockchain networks. It competes on product breadth, onchain access and the amount of tokenized exposure in circulation.

Dinari connects its dShares products with regulated brokerage operations, reserve reporting and shareholder economics. Its offer places more weight on the regulated securities relationship behind each token.

Robinhood controls the customer account, token product and distribution experience. Its European tokenized stock offer is more closed than xStocks, but that control can make pricing, compliance and customer support easier to manage.

Coinbase has sought permission to add tokenized equities in the United States. Its exchange, custody relationships and large customer base would provide immediate distribution if regulators approve the product.

Nasdaq and other established market operators are working on issuer sponsored digital shares that remain close to recognized exchanges, transfer agents and market supervision. Those products may travel less freely, but they are designed to preserve the legal rights attached to the security.

Access Still Depends On Local Rules

xStocks aren’t currently available to retail clients in Canada, the United States or the United Kingdom. The Canadian exclusion is notable because Payward Canada is registered as a restricted dealer. Canadians can use Kraken’s approved crypto platform, but that registration doesn’t authorize xStocks.

GTN gives Payward the brokerage, custody and records needed to add shares from more countries. Even so, local securities rules will decide where those products can actually be sold.

Talking Point

Can Payward scale xStocks across markets and product types without blurring the difference between owning a share and tracking one?

NCFA Company Intelligence Snapshot

Payward / xStocks

Tokenized equity products connecting traditional share custody with exchanges, wallets and blockchain markets
Last updated Jul 22, 2026

Company At A Glance

LaunchedJun 30, 2025
DeveloperPayward, parent company of Kraken
IssuerBacked Assets (JE) Limited, Jersey
StructureTracker certificates backed by referenced shares or ETFs
OwnershipPayward completed its acquisition of Backed Finance in Jan 2026
Primary MarketKYC, approved wallets and US$5,000 minimum for direct issuance or redemption
DistributionKraken, third party exchanges, wallets and DeFi applications
NetworksEthereum, Solana and other supported blockchain networks
Reported ScaleUS$35B+ transaction volume and nearly 200,000 holders
CanadaNot currently available to Canadian retail clients
Milestones
Select a milestone to follow the development of Payward and xStocks
Milestone 1

xStocks Launches With Tokenized U.S. Equities (Jun 2025)

Kraken launched 60 xStocks for eligible clients outside the United States on June 30, 2025. Backed supplied the issuance structure, while Kraken provided the first large distribution channel and customer interface.

Company

Kraken And BackedThe exchange and tokenization provider launch xStocks together

Stage

Commercial LaunchTokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs enter live distribution

Capital

Asset BackedEach token is supported by the corresponding underlying security

Markets

Non U.S. ClientsThe rollout begins outside the United States

Customers

Kraken UsersEligible clients gain fractional equity exposure through a crypto account

Competition

Portable TokensWithdrawal to self custody distinguishes the product from a closed broker balance

Additional Company Data

  • The public launch began with 60 U.S. stocks and ETFs
  • Backed Assets (JE) Limited issued the tracker certificates
  • Payward Digital Solutions Ltd. provided access to eligible Kraken clients
  • Solana was the initial blockchain network

NCFA Perspective

Tokens that can leave the exchange are easier for other platforms to support. That portability gave xStocks a route beyond Kraken from the start.

Frequently Asked Questions About xStocks

What are xStocks?
xStocks are tokenized tracker certificates that provide economic exposure to listed shares and ETFs. Backed Assets (JE) Limited issues the current products and holds corresponding traditional securities as collateral.
Does an xStock make the holder a shareholder?
No. An xStock holder doesn’t own the referenced company’s shares and receives no voting rights, direct shareholder information rights or residual claim against that company.
What does GTN provide to xStocks?
GTN will execute trades in the international shares, hold those assets in custody and maintain the ledgering, record keeping and sub accounting needed to support the tokens. Hong Kong comes first, with UK, European and South Korean assets planned.
How are xStocks backed?
xStocks says each product is backed by the corresponding share or ETF in dedicated collateral accounts. An independent security agent can take control of those accounts after an issuer default, although recovery may involve selling the collateral rather than delivering shares to tokenholders.
Where can xStocks be traded?
Eligible users can access xStocks through Kraken and participating third party exchanges, wallets and blockchain applications. Availability, trading hours, liquidity and product selection differ by venue and country.
Are xStocks available in Canada?
No. xStocks aren’t currently available to Canadian retail clients. Payward Canada’s restricted dealer registration allows Kraken to offer approved crypto services in Canada, but it doesn’t authorize xStocks.
How are xStocks different from Nasdaq’s planned equity tokens?
Current xStocks are third party tracker certificates. Nasdaq’s proposed tokens are intended to involve the public company and preserve the governance and investor rights attached to the actual security.

Information notice: Company figures are identified and attributed where applicable. Product availability and legal treatment vary by jurisdiction and may change after the stated update date. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter

 

APX And Netcoins Launch Embedded Crypto Lending

July 21, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Digital Assets, Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Embedded Finance

AI Image – Crypto backed loan dashboard on phone and laptop

Regulatory Relief Becomes Embedded Lending Infrastructure

On July 21, 2026, APX Lending launched its Canadian Lending as a Service platform with Netcoins. Eligible users can access crypto backed loans inside the Netcoins app while APX provides the capital, underwriting, compliance, collateral management, technology and servicing behind the product.

Netcoins is the first Canadian platform to go live on the infrastructure. The rollout builds on an existing relationship rather than starting from zero. BIGG Digital Assets invested in APX and announced the Netcoins partnership in May 2025, and Netcoins later added an in app lending page and calculator while the companies worked toward full integration.

The new launch turns APX’s securities law relief into infrastructure another Canadian platform can distribute. APX can now place its lending system behind a partner’s customer relationship rather than relying only on borrowers who arrive through its own channel.

Netcoins Keeps The Customer While APX Runs The Loan

Netcoins brings the app, customer relationship and regulated crypto trading channel. Netcoins became one of Canada’s early restricted dealer crypto platforms in 2021. It is owned by publicly traded BIGG Digital Assets, which combines Netcoins with blockchain analytics and compliance technology under a compliance first operating model.

APX runs the lending operation behind the interface. It supplies capital, reviews each application, performs the required account appropriateness assessment, manages collateral, handles servicing and monitors loan to value levels around the clock. APX or a wholly owned special purpose vehicle remains the lender under the loan agreement.

The partnership lets Netcoins add credit without creating its own lending balance sheet, underwriting team or collateral controls. APX gains distribution through an established Canadian platform, while Netcoins can add a new revenue line and give customers another reason to keep assets inside its ecosystem.

The model resembles other forms of embedded lending infrastructure, but the collateral is digital. The customer sees a loan inside a familiar platform even though a specialist provider operates the credit system behind it.

Collateral Rules Matter More Than A Fast Application

Netcoins’ lending page currently shows loans starting at C$10,000 or USDC 10,000, using Bitcoin or Ether as collateral. Terms can run for up to 60 months, and the displayed interest rate starts at 12.99%. Final terms and eligibility are determined during APX’s application process.

Borrowers can access Canadian dollars or USDC without a conventional credit check, but the loan is secured by crypto. If the collateral value falls, the loan to value ratio rises. APX can require more collateral or partial repayment and may liquidate assets when the applicable threshold is reached.

The April 2025 OSC decision permits APX to accept Bitcoin and Ether unless the principal regulator approves another asset. It also requires client disclosures, account appropriateness reviews and third party custody controls. The relief is time limited, expires three years after the decision and should not be treated as a general precedent for other lenders.

APX says collateral is held in segregated BitGo Trust cold storage, remains visible on chain and is not pooled, re-lent or rehypothecated. Customers should still understand that crypto collateral is not protected by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund and can be sold if the loan breaches its terms.

Competition Now Includes The Lending Layer

Netcoins adds crypto backed credit to trading, custody, staking and card products without building a lending operation internally.

APX Lending supplies regulated credit infrastructure, capital, collateral controls and servicing behind partner branded experiences.

Ledn operates a specialist Bitcoin backed lending business and has connected crypto loans with institutional funding markets.

Canadian crypto platforms that focus mainly on trading and custody may now need to decide whether lending belongs in their product mix.

Banks and fintechs could eventually use similar infrastructure if they want to offer digital asset secured credit without holding or operating the full crypto lending stack.

A Shared Interface Doesn't Remove Shared Responsibility

The commercial appeal is clear, but do users understand who is doing what?

Netcoins controls the experience, but APX approves and services the loan. Customers need clear information about the lender, collateral transfer, interest costs, margin notices, liquidation rules, data sharing and complaint handling before they apply.

Andrei Poliakov has followed this compliance first approach before. In a 2019 NCFA interview with Coinberry, he described the goal of building a trusted Canadian crypto business with supportive banking and long term operating discipline.

Coinberry was later acquired by WonderFi for C$38.5 million as regulatory costs encouraged consolidation. APX applies that experience to shared infrastructure that several platforms may be able to use rather than each one building a separate lending operation.

If the model performs well, APX could become a common lending layer behind several crypto platforms. If servicing, disclosures or liquidations create friction, the platform presenting the loan will share the reputational cost.

Talking Point

Will APX become the lending layer behind several Canadian crypto platforms, or will larger exchanges eventually build or acquire their own credit infrastructure?

NCFA Company Intelligence Snapshot

APX Lending

Regulated crypto backed lending and partner infrastructure for digital asset platforms
Last updated Jul 21, 2026

Company At A Glance

Founded2023 by Andrei Poliakov
HeadquartersToronto, Canada
StatusPrivate
Regulatory StructureTime limited securities law relief issued Apr 1, 2025
ProductsDirect crypto backed loans, private client lending and Lending as a Service
CollateralBitcoin and Ether in Canada
Loan CurrencyCanadian dollars and USDC
Funding CapacityC$20M accordion credit facility announced Oct 2025
CustodySegregated BitGo Trust cold storage
Milestones
Select a milestone to follow APX Lending’s development
Milestone 1

APX Lending Is Founded (2023)

Andrei Poliakov founded APX Lending in 2023 after helping build Coinberry, one of Canada’s early regulated crypto trading platforms. APX focused on secured credit that lets borrowers access liquidity without selling Bitcoin or Ether.

Company

APX LendingCrypto backed lending built around regulated infrastructure

Stage

FormationA new lender develops after the Coinberry operating experience

Capital

Private FundingEarly financing details not publicly disclosed

Markets

CanadaA compliance first route into digital asset credit

Customers

Crypto HoldersIndividuals and businesses seeking liquidity without selling

Competition

Custody First LendingSegregated collateral and no rehypothecation

Additional Company Data

  • Poliakov previously co-founded and led Coinberry
  • The first product focused on loans secured by digital assets
  • APX developed proprietary loan and collateral management technology
  • Revenue and early funding remain private

NCFA Perspective

APX began with a founder who had already worked through Canadian crypto compliance, banking and custody challenges. The new company applied that experience to lending rather than another trading platform.


NCFA Jan 2018 resizeThe National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

NCFA Financial Innovation MapNCFA Innovation Opportunity BriefsNCFA Fintech Insights
NCFA Fintech WhispererNCFA Fintech Fridays PodcastNCFA Weekly Newsletter