Category Archives: Innovation and Resources

August 24, 2026 Enterprise, Scaleup, Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, Small Businesses, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech Services, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Legal Issues, Regulation, Consultation, Marketing, Strategy, Growth, Design, Regtech, Compliance, Governance, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

How Mergers and Acquisitions Help Canadian Companies Grow

Aug 24, 2026

Growing a business does not always mean starting from scratch. While companies can expand by hiring more employees, developing new products or entering new markets organically, those strategies can take years to produce meaningful results. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) give Canadian companies another option: acquire an established business, customer base, team or capability and accelerate growth.

For companies with the right strategy and financial position, an acquisition can accomplish in months what might otherwise take years to build internally.

That does not mean every acquisition creates value. Successful M&A requires careful planning, realistic valuations, thorough due diligence and a clear understanding of what the company hopes to accomplish after the transaction closes. When those pieces come together, however, mergers and acquisitions can become a powerful part of a Canadian company's long-term growth strategy.

Enter New Markets Faster

Expanding into a new geographic market can be expensive and uncertain.

A company entering another province, for example, may need to establish a location, hire employees, build local relationships, advertise its services and develop an entirely new customer base. Even a successful expansion can take several years before the new operation becomes firmly established.

Acquiring an existing company can significantly shorten that process.

Instead of building everything from the ground up, the buyer may acquire an established brand, experienced employees, existing contracts, supplier relationships and a customer base that already generates revenue.

This can be particularly valuable in a country as geographically large as Canada. A company established in Alberta that wants to expand into British Columbia or Ontario may find that acquiring an existing operation provides a much more direct route into the market than opening a new location independently.

The acquisition still needs to make strategic and financial sense, but it can remove many of the barriers associated with entering an unfamiliar market.

Increase Market Share

Acquisitions can also help businesses increase their presence within markets where they already operate.

If two companies serve similar customers, combining them may create a larger organization with more revenue, greater resources and a stronger competitive position.

The benefits can go beyond simply combining two customer lists.

A larger company may have greater purchasing power with suppliers, more resources for marketing, stronger recruitment capabilities and the ability to spread administrative costs across a larger revenue base.

This is one reason M&A can be particularly attractive in fragmented industries where many small and mid-sized businesses compete for the same customers.

Rather than relying entirely on organic growth, a company may acquire competitors or complementary businesses over time and gradually build a larger market position.

Add New Products or Services

Developing a new service internally requires time, expertise and investment.

A company may need to hire specialized employees, purchase equipment, develop systems and spend months or years building credibility in the new area.

Buying a business that already provides that service can offer a faster path.

Consider a construction company that wants to expand into a specialized trade, a technology company that needs a particular software capability or a professional services firm that wants to introduce an entirely new division. An acquisition can provide the people, systems and customer relationships required to add that offering immediately.

This strategy can also create opportunities for cross-selling.

The acquiring company may be able to introduce its existing services to the acquired company's customers while offering the acquired company's services to its own customer base.

When there is a strong fit between the two businesses, the combined organization can sometimes generate more revenue than the companies could have produced independently.

Acquire Talent and Expertise

Finding qualified employees is a major challenge for many Canadian businesses.

In industries where specialized skills are difficult to recruit, M&A can effectively become a way of acquiring an established team.

Instead of hiring employees individually and building a department over time, a company may acquire a business that already has the technical knowledge, leadership and experience it needs.

The value of an acquisition may therefore extend well beyond physical assets or annual revenue.

Engineers, tradespeople, developers, sales teams, managers and other specialized employees can represent a significant part of the value being acquired.

Retaining those employees after closing is equally important. If key people leave immediately following the transaction, some of the strategic value of the acquisition can disappear with them.

For that reason, employee retention and integration should be considered before the deal is completed rather than treated as an issue to solve afterwards.

Strengthen the Supply Chain

M&A can also be used to gain greater control over parts of a company's supply chain.

A manufacturer might acquire a supplier that produces an important component. A distributor could acquire a transportation or logistics operation. A company that relies heavily on an outside service provider might decide there is strategic value in bringing that capability in-house.

This type of acquisition is often referred to as vertical integration.

The goal is not necessarily to increase market share. Instead, the company may be trying to improve reliability, reduce costs, protect margins or gain greater control over an important part of its operations.

Recent disruptions to global supply chains have made this consideration increasingly important for companies that rely on specialized materials, manufacturing capacity or transportation networks.

Owning more of the supply chain can sometimes reduce exposure to outside disruptions, although it also means taking responsibility for operating another part of the business.

Create Economies of Scale

Two businesses operating separately often duplicate many expenses.

Each may have its own accounting department, office space, software subscriptions, management structure, insurance policies, marketing costs and administrative systems.

After an acquisition, some of those functions may be combined.

If the merged company can generate more revenue without increasing overhead at the same rate, profitability may improve.

Greater scale can also improve negotiating power. Larger organizations may be able to negotiate better terms with suppliers, lenders, technology providers and other vendors.

These efficiencies are commonly described as synergies, but they should be evaluated carefully. It is easy to assume that combining two companies will automatically reduce costs. In reality, integration itself can be expensive, and some operations may be more difficult to combine than expected.

The strongest deals are generally based on realistic efficiencies rather than aggressive assumptions about how much money will be saved.

Provide an Exit and Succession Option

M&A does not only benefit acquiring companies.

Canada has a significant number of privately owned and family-run businesses whose owners will eventually need to transition out of the company.

Some businesses can be transferred to family members or employees. Others may ultimately be sold to another company, management team, private equity group or individual buyer.

That creates opportunities on both sides of the transaction.

An established company can acquire a successful business rather than building a competing operation, while the seller receives a way to realize the value that has been created over many years.

Transactions can take several forms, including asset purchases, share purchases and management buyouts. The structure of the transaction can affect taxes, liabilities, financing and what the buyer actually acquires, which is why companies considering a deal often involve experienced M&A legal counsel early in the process rather than waiting until an agreement is ready to be signed.

Reduce the Risk of Building Something New

Every growth strategy involves risk.

Launching a new product can fail. Opening a location in another province does not guarantee customers will follow. Building a new division may require significant investment before producing any revenue.

An acquisition provides something different: an operating business with a track record.

Buyers can examine financial statements, customer concentration, contracts, employees, assets and historical performance before deciding whether to proceed.

That does not eliminate risk. It simply provides more information about the business being acquired.

This is where due diligence becomes critical.

A company may look attractive based on revenue and profitability while still carrying risks related to contracts, taxes, litigation, customer concentration, intellectual property, employment obligations or debt.

Finding those issues before closing can affect the purchase price, deal structure or even the decision to proceed.

Growth Depends on What Happens After the Deal

Closing an acquisition is not the end of an M&A strategy.

It is the beginning of the integration process.

Companies need to decide how systems will be combined, how employees will work together, whether brands will remain separate and how customers will be introduced to the new organization.

Culture can be just as important as finances.

See: Fintech Fridays EP65: Personal Guarantees: The Most Expensive Autograph an Entrepreneur Can Sign

Two profitable companies may struggle after a merger if their management styles, employee expectations or ways of working are fundamentally incompatible.

Successful Canadian companies therefore tend to approach acquisitions as more than financial transactions. The goal is not simply to buy revenue. It is to acquire something that makes the overall business stronger.

When the strategic fit is clear and the transaction is structured carefully, M&A can give companies access to new markets, customers, talent, technology and capabilities much faster than organic growth alone. For businesses looking at the next stage of expansion, acquiring the right company can be one of the most effective ways to get there.

The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 24, 2026 Enterprise, Scaleup, Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, Small Businesses, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech International, Fintech Opinions, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Legal Issues, Regulation, Consultation, Marketing, Strategy, Growth, Design, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

Can Canadian Fintechs Diversify Beyond The U.S. Faster?

August 24, 2026 | NCFA Insight | SME Finance And Business Banking, Cross Border Payments And FX, Competition And Market Structure, Public Sector Policy And Industrial Strategy

Canada Needs Faster Routes To Non-U.S. Revenue

On August 24, 2026, Canada-U.S. trade negotiations had collapsed with new 50% U.S. tariffs on certain Canadian products already in force from August 22. President Donald Trump then threatened to raise new additional 50% tariffs on all Canadian cars, trucks and auto parts beginning January 1, 2027. Canada plans retaliatory tariffs on some U.S. goods beginning September 8.

The breakdown adds fresh urgency to Canada’s push to build more trade outside the U.S. The federal government is already tilting export support in that direction. CanExport SMEs has approximately $31 million available for 2026 and 2027, with about $27.9 million available for non-U.S. market activities and $3.1 million for U.S. projects. The program says the allocation supports Canada’s objective of doubling non-U.S. exports over the next decade.

For fintech, software and other digital firms, the problem is how quickly Canadian companies can turn access to a foreign market into customers and recurring revenue. Europe, the UK, Singapore, Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East already have local firms and international competitors with licences, integrations, distribution, customer relationships and years of operating experience.

Statistics Canada reported $70.3 billion of digitally delivered commercial services exports in 2023. Large firms increased those exports by 20.1%, while small and medium sized firms recorded a 7.6% decline. Canadian multinationals increased commercial services exports outside the U.S. by 21%, compared with 6.6% growth to the U.S. They also accounted for 75% of the increase in Canadian commercial services exports to non-U.S. markets.

NCFA's earlier digital export comparison shows Singapore ahead of Canada despite operating from a far smaller domestic economy. Singapore ranked 11th globally in the underlying 2023 data at US$153 billion, compared with Canada in 16th place at US$118 billion.

Canada doesn't just need another list of markets to enter. It needs more startups and SMEs able to win non-U.S. customers faster and build businesses that can keep competing once they get there.

Late Entry Raises The Cost Of Winning Non-U.S. Markets

Canada already has substantial export infrastructure. The Trade Commissioner Service connects companies with customers, partners and investors. Canadian Technology Accelerators provide business development support, strategic guidance and local introductions. CanExport reduces part of the cost of entering new markets, while Export Development Canada's Trade Impact Program provides financing, working capital, guarantees and credit insurance to companies dealing with trade uncertainty.

The Canadian Technology Accelerator also produces measurable results. A Global Affairs study found participating firms had 27% higher revenue one year after completing the program than otherwise similar companies. The positive differences in revenue, assets and payroll became larger over the following years.

But Global Affairs could not determine how much the firms actually became more international because the available data were insufficient. That leaves the commercial outcome Canada now needs to understand. How many firms supported expansion into London, Singapore or another non-U.S. market are still generating recurring revenue there two, three or five years later?

Canadian fintech history shows why market entry alone is a weak measure. Wealthsimple built a UK business for almost five years and reached about 16,000 customers before selling the operation and concentrating on Canada. Clearco expanded into several overseas markets before transferring its international business to Outfund as ecommerce growth slowed and financing conditions deteriorated.

Neither case proves Canadian fintechs cannot compete abroad. They show how demanding a foreign operation becomes when a company has to fund customer acquisition, staff, compliance, banking relationships, treasury, tax and product adaptation while continuing to compete at home.

VoPay is using another model. The Vancouver founded payments infrastructure company established a global headquarters in Doha in January 2026 while keeping its Canadian operations active. Qatar is being built as a major hub for expansion across the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia, with more than 400 planned hires across engineering, technology, security, compliance, data and platform operations. The company didn't abandon Canada, but a meaningful part of its next stage of international capability is being built outside the country.

For Canada, it's not a simple win or loss. VoPay remains rooted in Canada while using Qatar as a launch point into several non-U.S. regions. Using a regional hub can also reduce expansion risk by putting management and operating capability closer to target markets while the Canadian core continues to run. The policy question is where the next layer of technical talent, management, partnerships and enterprise value accumulates as Canadian companies expand internationally.

The U.S. capital pull starts much earlier. NCFA's productive participation analysis examined the Canadian founder drain into the U.S. technology ecosystem. Barn Ventures describes a founder conveyor in which U.S. investors and programs recruit Canadian talent from high school and university through company formation and later scale.

Barn's analysis of the Dominion List found 517 U.S. based companies with a Canadian founder had raised about US$414 billion. It found 73% headquartered in California and 56% in San Francisco. Barn also found the number of listed companies founded each year rose sharply after 2022, while acknowledging that the Dominion List is a curated catalogue rather than a census.

Large U.S. capital markets and Silicon Valley's technology ecosystem will always attract ambitious Canadian founders. Those organizations are doing what successful capital markets do. The Canadian problem becomes more serious when founders also conclude they need to leave to get the capital, customers, infrastructure or operating environment required to build a major company. Canada can then lose value at both ends. Some promising founders build in the U.S. before substantial enterprise value accumulates here.

Also, Canada's main export programs generally engage firms after they have built meaningful operating capacity or market traction. By then, their products, sales models and management experience may already have been shaped largely around Canada and the U.S., while competitors in non-U.S. markets have spent years building customers and local experience. That is why promising firms should encounter non-U.S. customers, regulators and market requirements earlier, before they reach the stage where most formal export support begins.

Financial infrastructure can add to that timing gap. NCFA's financial infrastructure history shows Canadian fintechs developing while Real-Time Rail, wider payments access and regulated consumer driven banking arrived multiple years later than comparable infrastructure in several major fintech markets.

That does not explain Wealthsimple's UK exit, Clearco's retrenchment or any other individual company decision. It also affects what Canadian firms learn at home. Years of working with real time payments, portable financial data, modern APIs and digital onboarding build practical experience that can help when companies expand into other markets.

If Canadian firms gain important financial capabilities later, they also have less time to turn them into competitive advantages before entering non-U.S. markets.

Canada Can Reach Non-U.S. Revenue Faster

The quickest response to Canada's urgent need to diversify beyond the U.S. is not more export information. Canada already has market intelligence, trade commissioners, financing programs and buyer introductions. The priority is to shorten the time between choosing a non-U.S. market and winning recurring revenue there. Canada can do many things differently to help achieve this.

1. Start earlier. Promising fintech and digital companies should encounter non-U.S. customers, regulators and financial institutions while their products are still developing. This doesn't mean sending every startup overseas. It means finding companies with strong technology and real differentiation early enough that requirements in several jurisdictions can influence what they build.

See: DPI Digital Finance Works. Why Is Canada Still Waiting?

A company that learns to work across several payment systems, data rules, onboarding requirements and regulatory environments before reaching scale develops a different skill set from one encountering that complexity for the first time after years focused on Canada and the U.S.

2. Push buyer introductions toward commercial conversion. Canada already connects companies with qualified contacts, potential customers and partners. But they need to track and measure how consistently those introductions turn into technical evaluations, paid pilots, contracts and recurring revenue. Trade Commissioners in priority non-U.S. markets are well placed to identify concrete buyer needs and concentrate Canadian firms with relevant products against those opportunities.

That also creates better intelligence. If Canadian fintechs repeatedly lose the same types of opportunities in London, Singapore or São Paulo, Canada can determine whether the problem is product fit, pricing, licensing, procurement, financing or a capability competitors already possess.

3. Finance the period between market entry and recurring revenue. CanExport can provide up to $50,000 toward eligible international business development costs. EDC's Trade Impact Program has up to $5 billion of additional capacity over two years and supports working capital, guarantees, credit insurance and other financing tools. Those tools become more useful when they are organized around the economics of a specific foreign operation. Customer acquisition, regulatory work, FX, payments, local staff and management time can absorb capital before a new market supports itself.

For regulated fintechs, entering another country is like building a second company while the first keeps operating. Management needs to know what the foreign operation costs, what milestones justify further investment and when the economics no longer support continued expansion. That discipline protects the Canadian core while giving a promising foreign business enough runway to prove itself.

4. Measure whether companies win and stay. Canada should track the time from choosing a non-U.S. market to the first paying customer, how many assisted firms develop recurring revenue and how many are still operating there after two, three and five years.

The same scorecard can track local licences, staff and operating entities alongside the value that remains anchored in Canada. That includes Canadian employment, management functions, intellectual property, investment and capital recycled into the next generation of companies.

Those results would expose the bottlenecks quickly. A firm that receives many introductions but cannot win customers has a different problem from one that wins customers but cannot finance its expansion. A company delayed by licensing, payments or compliance needs a different response again.

See: UK Private Banks Commit £11 Billion To SME Export Lending

Canada's non-U.S. diversification push became urgent much faster than companies can build international experience. The fastest response is therefore partly to start earlier.

Give promising firms exposure to several markets sooner
Complete the financial infrastructure they need to build competitive products at home
Convert foreign demand into paid business more aggressively
Finance strong foreign opportunities long enough to establish whether they work

Then judge success by whether Canadian companies are winning customers outside the U.S., staying in those markets and keeping enough of the resulting value anchored in Canada.

Talking Point

Canada now needs to diversify beyond the U.S. faster than many of its technology companies have historically expanded internationally. Can it help promising fintechs build non-U.S. customers and operating experience early enough to win against established competitors while keeping more of the resulting enterprise value anchored in Canada?

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 21, 2026 Blockchain, Crypto, Digital Assets Regulations, Blockchain, Crypto, Digital Assets, Tokens, CBDCs, Stablecoins, Metaverse, NFTs, Cyber Security, Quantum, Hacks, Fraud Alerts, Risks, InsurTech, Enterprise, Scaleup, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech International, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Online Funding / Investing Portals, Payments, Transfers, Rewards, Regtech, Compliance, Governance, Research, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

NCFA Weekly Fintech Intelligence Aug 15-21, 2026

Aug 15, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer | Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Wealthtech Investing And Trading, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Cross Border Payments And FX, Regulation And Policy, Insurance And Insurtech, Treasury Liquidity And Cash Management, Artificial Intelligence And Data, SME Finance And Business Banking, Risk Compliance And Regtech

Image: Freepik

This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026, March 14-20, 2026, March 21-27, 2026, March 28-April 3, 2026, April 4-10, 2026, April 11-17, 2026, April 18-24, 2026, April 25-May 1, 2026, May 2-8, 2026, May 9-15, 2026, May 16-22, 2026, May 23-29, 2026, May 30-June 5, 2026, June 6-12, 2026, June 13-19, 2026, June 20-26, 2026, June 27-July 3, 2026, July 4-July 10, 2026, July 11-July 17, 2026, July 18-24, 2026, July 25-July 31 2026, August 1-August 7, 2026, August 8-August 14, 2026).

Weekly Fintech Market Intelligence Aug 15 - 21, 2026

Regulation And Policy

OCC Says 23 Of 40 New Bank Charter Applications Involve Digital Assets

August 19, 2026, United States

Comptroller Jonathan Gould said the OCC received 40 applications for new bank charters during roughly the previous 18 months, with 23 business plans involving some form of digital asset activity.
Gould said payment stablecoins are becoming an ordinary part of the prospective charter pipeline as applicants integrate digital assets into regulated banking models.
The OCC is also implementing its responsibilities under the GENIUS Act and expects to issue a final payment stablecoin rule by November.

The numbers show digital assets becoming part of bank formation rather than remaining mainly an activity added to established institutions. More than half of the OCC's recent charter applications include digital asset activity, extending the same infrastructure-ownership question behind Ripple's U.S. bank charter application across a much larger applicant pool. These are applications, not approved banks, but the pipeline shows how many digital asset firms are trying to bring licensing, custody, payments and stablecoin activity inside regulated banking structures.

MAS Introduces New Measures To Strengthen Singapore's Asset Management Hub

August 19, 2026, Singapore

The Monetary Authority of Singapore introduced a package of measures intended to strengthen Singapore's competitiveness as an international asset-management centre.
The package includes a proposed tax exemption for qualifying profit-related returns earned by fund-management professionals and a MAS investment programme focused on hedge-fund managers operating in Singapore.
Singapore will also introduce an Investment Management Track under the Overseas Networks & Expertise Pass to support recruitment of experienced investment-management professionals.

Singapore is combining tax policy, institutional capital and immigration settings to compete for asset managers and investment talent. The package goes beyond licensing or regulatory simplification by addressing where firms locate teams, where experienced professionals work and whether managers can build enough local scale to anchor investment activity in Singapore. That makes asset-management competitiveness an industrial-policy question as well as a financial-services one.

CSA Reports C$4B Raised Under Expanded Listed Issuer Exemption

August 18, 2026, Canada

The Canadian Securities Administrators says hundreds of listed issuers raised almost C$4 billion during the first year after limits under the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption were increased, an eightfold increase in the pace of capital raising compared with the original limits.
CSA members issued 763 investor alerts, cautions and warnings during the reporting period, with more than 85% related to crypto assets, and deactivated 11,728 malicious websites representing 19,860 URLs.
The CSA says Project Tokenization engaged more than 240 organizations while regulators also continued examining stablecoins, prediction markets and the use of AI in capital markets.

The report provides unusually concrete evidence on both sides of Canada's securities-policy agenda. Regulators are lowering friction in parts of the capital-raising system while expanding technology-enabled fraud disruption and examining new digital market structures. The C$4 billion raised under the expanded exemption strengthens the question of who gets capital as funding channels multiply because it gives regulators measurable evidence that changing financing limits can alter how Canadian public companies access capital.

Bank Of Canada Publishes Nine RPAA Violations

August 18, 2026, Canada

The Bank of Canada's August 18 publication of three enforcement notices brought its public Retail Payment Activities Act list to nine payment service providers.
Each notice records a section 23 violation for performing retail payment activities without submitting a registration application.
The Bank imposed no administrative monetary penalty in the nine published cases. The notices remain public for five years.
An internal review maintained the nature of Equals Money's violation and its zero-dollar penalty, while finding that the Act did not authorize replacing the notice with a warning letter.

As NCFA's review of the RPAA notices explains, a zero-dollar penalty still creates a durable public compliance record. Registration checks now belong in partner onboarding, procurement, investor diligence and market-access planning for payment firms serving Canada.

SEC Proposes Crypto Fundraising Rules With US$5M And US$75M Exemptions

August 18, 2026, United States

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, a tailored securities offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets.
A proposed startup exemption would permit offerings of up to US$5 million during a four-year period, while a fundraising exemption would allow offerings of up to US$75 million during each 12-month period.
Issuers would face principles-based disclosure requirements and remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation rules. The proposal also includes a conditional safe harbour addressing when a crypto asset would no longer be treated as subject to an investment contract.

The SEC is moving from defining how securities law applies to crypto toward creating specific capital-raising pathways for the sector. Its March crypto market structure interpretation established a classification and lifecycle framework; Regulation Crypto Assets would add tailored exemptions that qualifying issuers could use to raise capital within it. If adopted, the rules could materially change how early stage crypto ventures fund development, what they must disclose and how token-based fundraising competes with established private-market exemptions.

U.S. Treasury Proposes GENIUS Act Rules For Payment Stablecoins

August 17, 2026, United States

The U.S. Treasury issued a proposed rule to implement Section 3 of the GENIUS Act governing the issuance, offering and sale of payment stablecoins in the United States.
The proposal defines when an issuer would need an appropriate federal or state GENIUS licence and when a payment stablecoin is considered offered or sold to a person in the United States.
Treasury says the Act is expected to take effect January 18, 2027, with additional restrictions beginning July 18, 2028 on digital asset service providers offering payment stablecoins that are not issued by licensed issuers.

The proposal turns the GENIUS Act from legislation into an operating framework for stablecoin issuers and the platforms that distribute their tokens. The definitions of where issuance occurs, which issuers need a licence and when a stablecoin is being offered into the U.S. market will determine how domestic and foreign providers structure access. For exchanges, wallets and payment platforms, compliance will increasingly depend on the regulatory status of the stablecoins they make available, not only on their own licences.

Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement

Helcim Raises C$53M As Payments Volume Approaches C$10B

August 21, 2026, Canada

Calgary based Helcim closed a C$53 million Series C led by BDC Capital's Growth Venture Fund, with Curql Collective, Gold House Ventures and existing investors participating.
Helcim says it serves more than 22,000 active merchants, has passed C$150 million in annual revenue and expects to process nearly C$10 billion in payments during 2026.
The company plans to invest in payment software, hardware and integrations while expanding into vendor payments and tools for managing everyday business finances.

Helcim is using a 22,000 merchant distribution base to extend beyond payment acceptance into more of the financial workflow around small businesses. Vendor payments and business finance could increase revenue per merchant while putting Helcim into closer competition with processors, banks and software platforms that already bundle payments with operating tools. Nearly C$10 billion in expected annual volume gives that expansion enough scale to watch.

Modulr Becomes Direct CHAPS Participant At Bank Of England

August 19, 2026, United Kingdom

Modulr became a direct participant in CHAPS and can now settle high value, same day payments directly at the Bank of England.
The Bank of England lists Modulr FS Limited among its CHAPS direct participants. Payment obligations between participants settle individually through real time gross settlement on the day they are submitted.
With existing direct connections to Faster Payments and Bacs, Modulr is the only UK non-bank payment service provider with direct access to all three major domestic payment schemes.

Direct participation removes an intermediary from Modulr’s CHAPS settlement process and gives it more control over payment routing and liquidity. The development offers a useful comparison with Canada’s expanding non-bank rail access, where membership and system participation determine how much infrastructure control payment providers can obtain.

AlphaPay Completes Motion Pay Integration In Canada

August 19, 2026, Canada

Payment Asia Group announced that its Canadian business AlphaPay completed the acquisition and integration of Canadian payment provider Motion Pay.
The combination brings Motion Pay's merchant network and operating resources into AlphaPay's platform, which supports international wallets and Canadian payment methods including Interac, Visa and Mastercard.
Payment Asia also disclosed a recent Canadian money services business registration as it expands local and cross-border payment services in North America.

The integration gives AlphaPay more Canadian merchant distribution while connecting domestic payment acceptance with Payment Asia's international payment capabilities. The strategic value will depend on whether the combined business can convert that larger merchant footprint into meaningful transaction volume and cross-border activity. The regulatory point also requires precision: Canadian MSBs are registered with FINTRAC, so the company's use of the term "MSB licence" should not be read as a separate banking or payment licence.

Nium Launches Domestic Card Issuance In The United States

August 19, 2026, United States

Nium launched domestic U.S. card issuance, extending its issuing platform into North America alongside existing capabilities across APAC, Europe and the Middle East.
The company says businesses can combine local U.S. card issuance with its payment infrastructure spanning more than 190 countries through one platform.
Nium issued more than 41 million card credentials across APAC, the Middle East and Europe during the previous 12 months, and its U.S. offering includes physical, virtual, single-use and multi-use credentials.

Domestic U.S. issuance gives Nium another local component inside a payment network already built for international use. Businesses operating across regions can reduce the number of separate issuing integrations they maintain while combining card programmes with cross-border payouts. That matters most in sectors such as travel and supplier payments, where one transaction can require several payment methods across multiple countries.

New Zealand Opens National Payments Upgrade Consultation

August 18, 2026, New Zealand

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand opened a public consultation on upgrading the country’s retail-payment infrastructure. Responses are due by October 27, 2026.
About NZ$2 trillion in retail payments passes between New Zealand bank accounts annually, yet the country remains one of the few developed economies without a real-time retail-payment system.
The consultation covers instant 24-hour payments, fraud safeguards, faster cross-border transactions, competition, technology adoption and clearer responsibility for system-wide planning.

New Zealand is still considering the architecture and governance of infrastructure that Canada has placed into approved rules through its Real-Time Rail framework. Payment providers have an early opportunity to address access, fraud responsibilities, interoperability and the role of nonbanks before New Zealand selects its modernization approach.

ECB Brings Offline Digital Euro Into Secure Hardware

August 18, 2026, European Union

The European Central Bank opened an expression of interest process to refine the standards needed for offline digital euro functionality.
The technical work examines deployment through embedded Secure Elements and embedded SIMs in smartphones, with participation sought from equipment manufacturers, mobile operators, virtual network operators and standards organizations.
Selected participants will assess the maturity, industry support and implementation constraints of the proposed standards. Applications are due September 25, ahead of a digital euro pilot planned for the second half of 2027.

Offline capability makes hardware compatibility, mobile operator participation and secure deployment part of payment infrastructure design. The consultation gives payment providers and technology companies a direct route into the standards discussion before the pilot begins.

Treasury Liquidity And Cash Management

Stripe Launches Treasury In Australia For Global Business Money Management

August 19, 2026, Australia

Stripe launched Treasury in Australia, allowing businesses to accept payments, hold and convert funds and pay recipients from the same Stripe environment.
Businesses can receive and hold AUD, USD, GBP and EUR, convert across 10 supported currencies and use incoming revenue to pay suppliers, contractors and third parties in nearly 100 countries.
Stripe also plans to bring Treasury for Platforms to Australia later in 2026, allowing platforms to embed financial accounts for their own customers.

Stripe is reducing the separation between payment acceptance and treasury operations for businesses already using its platform. Revenue can become available for supplier and contractor payments without first being transferred through a separate external banking workflow, while currency conversion stays inside the same system. Treasury for Platforms would extend that model further by letting software platforms distribute account functionality directly to their customers.

Artificial Intelligence And Data

Anchorage Digital Launches Regulated Banking Infrastructure For AI Agents

August 21, 2026, United States

Anchorage Digital launched Agentic Banking, institutional infrastructure designed to let organizations fund and control AI agents interacting with financial assets.
The platform applies corporate spending policies, Know Your Agent identity standards and real time compliance controls before settlement across stablecoins, fiat rails or tokenized credentials.
Anchorage is working with Google Cloud on cloud based key management and transaction infrastructure that combines Google's AI capabilities with Anchorage Digital's regulated custody and settlement services.

Giving an AI agent access to capital requires controls over identity, authority, spending limits, compliance and settlement before the transaction happens. Anchorage is putting those controls inside regulated banking infrastructure, extending the issues already emerging around AI payment consent and liability into institutional treasury and digital asset workflows. Banks, payment firms and fintech platforms now have a clearer benchmark for what controlled agent access to money can look like.

Binance Launches Agent OS For AI Access To Trading And Payments

August 20, 2026, Global

Binance launched Agent OS, a standardized developer layer connecting AI applications to its market data, account information, trading, wallet, payment and on-chain infrastructure.
Users can assign agents to dedicated subaccounts, configure permissions and revoke access, while supported agents can retrieve market and portfolio information and place trades within those controls.
The platform combines Binance APIs, Wallet Agentic Hub, x402 programmable payments, Skill Hub and Model Context Protocol support so developers do not need separate integrations for each financial capability.

Agent OS puts AI applications closer to financial actions rather than limiting them to analysis or recommendations. The important control boundary is between what an external agent decides and what Binance permits it to execute. That connects directly to the growing AI governance and compliance burden around authorization, audit trails, transaction limits and accountability when agents can act on financial infrastructure.

Ant International Expands FalconTST Financial Forecasting Model

August 20, 2026, Global

Ant International introduced FalconTST 2.0, the latest version of its time-series foundation model for forecasting financial and operational data.
The model is being applied with financial institutions including Barclays, Citi, Deutsche Bank and Standard Chartered across forecasting use cases.
Ant International has also made the Falcon 2.0 API available and maintains an open implementation of the FalconTST model family for time-series forecasting.

Financial AI is extending beyond conversational tools into models designed specifically for numerical sequences such as liquidity, transaction flows and other time-dependent financial data. Adoption by global banks gives the model more significance than a research release alone because forecasting accuracy can affect treasury, risk and operating decisions. That also raises the AI compliance burden around model validation, data quality, oversight and evidence when specialist models influence financial decisions.

Sun Life Reports Advisor AI Use Across More Than 11,000 Client Conversations

August 19, 2026, Canada

Sun Life says its generative AI Notes Assistant can summarize client meetings, compile action items and draft follow-up emails, saving advisors an estimated 15 to 30 minutes per client session.
An AI powered advisor concierge launched in July has already been used in more than 11,000 client conversations to help advisors retrieve information on products, policies and processes.
Sun Life says the tools operate within governance, privacy and security controls while retaining human judgment and accountability in the advisor workflow.

The useful evidence is adoption inside a real advisory workflow rather than another AI pilot announcement. More than 11,000 client conversations and measurable administrative time savings show where AI governance for Canadian financial advisors is becoming operational: meeting records, follow-up communications and internal information retrieval. As these tools become routine, firms need controls that keep advisor responsibility intact while still capturing the productivity benefit.

Stripe Agrees To Acquire OpenRouter As AI Infrastructure Expands

August 19, 2026, United States / Global

Stripe agreed to acquire OpenRouter, an AI model gateway that routes and optimizes token usage across more than 400 models from over 80 providers.
OpenRouter evaluates requests based on factors including task complexity, price, speed and reliability and is used by companies including NVIDIA, Zoom and Lovable.
Stripe says the acquisition will combine model-routing optimization with infrastructure it already provides for payments, billing and AI token economics.

Stripe is extending beyond the financial transaction layer into the infrastructure that determines which AI model handles a request and at what cost. That builds on Stripe's expanding infrastructure stack across payments, billing and financial operations. OpenRouter gives Stripe a position in both revenue collection and one of the largest variable costs facing AI companies: model and compute usage.

AWS Launches AgentCore Payments For Autonomous AI Transactions

August 18, 2026, Global

AWS made Amazon Bedrock AgentCore payments generally available, allowing AI agents to discover, access and pay for paid APIs, MCP services and content in production environments.
The service integrates with Coinbase and Stripe Privy wallets, supports x402 and the Machine Payment Protocol and can enforce configurable spending limits at the infrastructure layer.
AgentCore provides payment-session budgets, expiry controls, audit trails and transaction observability intended to limit and monitor autonomous agent spending.

Giving an AI agent permission to transact creates a different control problem from giving it permission to retrieve information or call software tools. AgentCore places deterministic spending limits and transaction records around an otherwise non-deterministic agent, separating the agent's decision process from the infrastructure that authorizes payment. That control layer is becoming central to whether autonomous financial activity can be deployed at production scale.

Wealthtech Investing And Trading

Kraken Launches U.S. Stock Trading Across The EEA

August 18, 2026, European Economic Area

Kraken launched access to more than 7,000 U.S. listed stocks for eligible customers across the EEA under its MiFID II authorization.
Traditional shares can now sit alongside more than 600 crypto assets and 700+ xStocks inside Kraken's regulated multi asset environment, without customers moving capital between separate platforms.
The conventional stocks and xStocks remain legally different products. The stock service is provided through Payward Europe Digital Solutions (CY) Limited, while xStocks are separately issued tokenized products backed by underlying shares.

Kraken is extending a crypto distribution platform into conventional brokerage while keeping tokenized equities available beside traditional shares. That gives customers two different ownership and market-access structures inside one interface and puts more competitive pressure on brokers that still separate securities, crypto and tokenized products across different accounts.

Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding

CFTC Proposes More Flexible Execution Rules For Permitted Swaps

August 20, 2026, United States

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed removing the requirement that swap execution facilities maintain an order book for transactions classified as permitted transactions.
The proposal would allow SEFs greater flexibility in deciding which execution methods they make available for swaps that are not subject to the mandatory trade-execution requirement.
The change would preserve the separate execution framework for required transactions while reducing a prescriptive platform requirement for the permitted category.

The proposal addresses how much trading functionality regulators should require when a swap does not have to trade through a prescribed execution method in the first place. Removing the order-book requirement could lower operating complexity for SEFs and give participants more choice in how less standardized or less liquid transactions are executed. The regulatory tradeoff is whether greater flexibility improves market efficiency without weakening transparency or competitive access.

Natural Adds Up To US$100M For AI Agent Payments

August 19, 2026, United States

Natural raised a credit facility of up to US$100 million from Upper90, adding to more than US$40 million in equity financing.
The facility gives Natural additional capital capacity for its payment and credit products as payment volume and deployed credit increase.
Natural identifies itself as a financial technology company. Wallet Account and banking services are provided by Column N.A., Member FDIC.

Natural says payment infrastructure at scale requires capital because funds can be advanced before cash settles. The Upper90 facility adds dedicated financing capacity to the software and payment products Natural is building for AI agents. It complements AI agent spending controls emerging elsewhere in the stack, where transaction limits, authorization records and auditability govern automated payments.

CFTC Seeks Input On Derivatives Markets For AI Compute

August 19, 2026, United States

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission requested public input on potential derivatives markets tied to computing capacity used by artificial intelligence and other high-performance workloads.
The review covers issues including market liquidity, price formation, manipulation, customer protection and how compute derivatives could be structured and traded.
The CFTC is also examining perpetual or other futures-style products that could allow companies and investors to manage exposure to changing compute costs.

Compute is starting to behave like a financial input rather than only a technology expense. Secondary markets are already emerging around scarce AI capacity, with market participants looking for better price discovery, liquidity and ways to manage infrastructure cost risk. Derivatives would take that development further by allowing firms to hedge future compute costs and availability, bringing market structure, manipulation and customer-protection questions directly into AI infrastructure.

ESMA Proposes Reporting Framework For Third Country CCP Clearing

August 18, 2026, European Union

ESMA opened consultation on technical standards for annual reporting by EU clearing members and clients on activity conducted through recognised third country central counterparties under EMIR Article 7d.
The proposed reporting includes instrument types, average annual cleared values by EU currency and asset class, margins, default-fund contributions and the largest payment obligation.
ESMA is trying to reuse information already available through existing EU reporting regimes and limit duplicate requirements, with comments due October 12, 2026.

The consultation exposes a tension inside post trade regulation: supervisors want better visibility into EU dependence on non-EU clearing infrastructure, but much of the relevant transaction information is already reported elsewhere. ESMA's design work therefore centres on identifying genuine data gaps rather than creating another parallel reporting system. The final technical standards will determine how much additional operational burden clearing firms face for that added visibility.

India Proposes Regulated GPU Leasing Through GIFT IFSC

August 18, 2026, India

IFSCA opened a consultation on specifying operating leases and hybrid operating and financial leases of GPUs and connected data-centre equipment as a financial product.
The proposed scope includes accelerated processors, AI servers, storage, networking, interconnect and power equipment needed to operate integrated computing clusters.
Financial institutions in GIFT IFSC could hold the equipment directly or use lease-in, lease-out arrangements. The proposal remains subject to consultation, subsequent notification and inclusion in the IFSC leasing framework.

A regulated leasing route would let AI operators finance compute capacity over time while giving GIFT IFSC a position in the capital layer beneath AI deployment. The proposal addresses the AI infrastructure costs that are becoming a material constraint on production use.

Alpaca Registers As Futures Commission Merchant For Prediction Markets

August 17, 2026, United States

Alpaca Derivatives LLC has registered with the CFTC as a futures commission merchant and is an NFA member as Alpaca prepares to add prediction markets to its infrastructure platform.
The company plans to let fintechs and financial platforms embed access to event contracts alongside other investment products through Alpaca infrastructure.
Alpaca Derivatives has not yet begun regulated FCM business operations, so the registration establishes the regulatory structure for a future launch rather than live customer access today.

Prediction markets are moving closer to the brokerage infrastructure already used to distribute financial products through fintech apps. That strengthens the innovation opportunity in regulated event contract infrastructure, where distribution, compliance, market integrity and settlement become as important as the contracts themselves. Alpaca's next proof point is whether partners actually embed the product once regulated operations begin.

Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

Blockchain.com Enters Nigeria SEC Regulatory Incubation Programme

August 18, 2026, Nigeria

Blockchain.com was admitted to the Nigerian Securities and Exchange Commission's Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme after satisfying the programme's initial participation requirements.
The company is authorized to operate within ARIP's defined sandbox scope while remaining subject to testing, compliance obligations and regulatory conditions set by the SEC.
ARIP gives Blockchain.com a supervised route to develop its Nigerian presence while the SEC evaluates digital asset business models, investor safeguards and anti money laundering controls.

The significance is regulated market access rather than a full crypto licence. Nigeria is using supervised incubation to bring international digital asset firms inside its regulatory perimeter while retaining control over permitted activities and operating conditions. For Blockchain.com, that creates a formal route into a large African digital finance market without treating sandbox admission as unrestricted authorization.

China Adds Eight Banks To The e-CNY Operating Network

August 17, 2026, China

China added eight commercial banks to the e-CNY operating network, increasing the number of participating operators from 22 to 30.
The newly added banks will begin providing digital yuan services after completing the required operational and technical preparations.
The expansion follows an earlier 2026 increase from 10 to 22 operators, extending the institutional distribution network behind China's central bank digital currency.

Adding more operating banks widens the distribution infrastructure behind the e-CNY without proving that customer adoption or transaction volumes have increased. The expansion builds on China's earlier digital yuan bank expansion and shows the operating network continuing to grow through established financial institutions rather than remaining concentrated among the original participants.

Cross Border Payments And FX

RoamQR And Pix Go Live For Cross Border QR Payments In Brazil

August 21, 2026, Brazil / Asia

Liquid Group and PagBrasil launched Phase 1 of the RoamQR and Pix connection, allowing users of participating Asian banking apps and digital wallets to pay participating Brazilian merchants by scanning existing Pix QR codes.
The companies completed commercial agreements, technical integration, certification and operational readiness after announcing the partnership in November 2025, making Brazil RoamQR's first live payment corridor in Latin America.
A planned second phase would allow Brazilian Pix users to make QR payments in Singapore and other RoamQR markets, subject to implementation readiness and regulatory approvals.

RoamQR connects international users to Pix without requiring Brazilian merchants to install new hardware or replace the QR infrastructure they already use. Participating wallets also avoid building separate bilateral integrations for each market. That is the interoperability problem highlighted in the cross border payments benchmark: strong domestic rails create more value when networks can connect them across borders without rebuilding the customer and merchant experience.

BOCHK And Ant International Expand Payments Treasury And SME Infrastructure

August 20, 2026, Hong Kong / Southeast Asia

Bank of China (Hong Kong) and Ant International formed a strategic partnership covering cross-border payments, real-time corporate liquidity management, AI-enabled treasury services and financial services for SMEs.
BOCHK will provide accounts and settlement banking services supporting Alipay+ payments across Southeast Asia, where the Alipay+ ecosystem spans more than 50 mobile payment partners covering over 2 billion user accounts.
Ant International's Bettr and BOCHK will explore blockchain and tokenization for real-time cash-flow and investment solutions, while WorldFirst will work with the bank on cross-border fund-management services for SMEs.

The partnership joins several financial layers that are often handled separately: consumer payment settlement, corporate liquidity, foreign exchange, tokenized treasury infrastructure and SME cross-border banking. It also fits Hong Kong's wider push toward tokenized financial infrastructure, where banks are combining regulated balance-sheet access with digital settlement and asset infrastructure rather than treating tokenization as a standalone product experiment.

TerraPay And Deutsche Bank Expand Cross Border Payment Connectivity

August 20, 2026, Global

TerraPay and Deutsche Bank announced an expanded relationship connecting TerraPay's cross-border payment infrastructure with Deutsche Bank's correspondent banking capabilities.
The arrangement gives TerraPay access to Deutsche Bank payment and foreign exchange services to support settlement across its international payment network.
The partnership connects fintech distribution with bank settlement infrastructure as TerraPay continues to provide cross-border payments into bank accounts and mobile wallets across multiple markets.

Cross-border payment platforms can simplify the customer-facing experience, but settlement still depends heavily on regulated banking infrastructure, currency access and correspondent relationships underneath the API. Those dependencies are a central reason faster cross-border payments remain operationally difficult. Deutsche Bank gives TerraPay another institutional layer for moving and settling funds across currencies and jurisdictions, where corridor coverage, liquidity and local network access still determine performance.

Fiserv Connects Merchant Platforms To Thunes Global Payout Network

August 17, 2026, United States / Global

Fiserv and Thunes are connecting Fiserv's merchant ecosystem to international payouts through a single integration for ecommerce platforms, marketplaces and other business customers.
Thunes says its Direct Global Network reaches 12 billion bank accounts and mobile wallets across more than 140 countries and 90 currencies.
The service will support payments to employees, suppliers and other recipients by combining Fiserv's merchant distribution with Thunes' cross border payout infrastructure.

Cross border payment competition is increasingly about how much complexity a platform can remove for the business initiating the payment. A single integration into global payout infrastructure can reduce the need to manage separate banking, wallet and local payment connections market by market. Fiserv now gives Thunes a much larger distribution channel into platforms and marketplaces that already manage business payment flows.

Afriex Details Global Innovations Bank Partnership Behind Cross Border Payments

August 17, 2026, United States / Africa / Global

Afriex disclosed details of a Global Innovations Bank partnership that became effective in Q2 2026 and supports sponsor banking and settlement for its cross-border payments infrastructure.
The arrangement provides Global USD Account access, expanded banking and regulatory coverage and faster settlement across supported corridors, with additional treasury and foreign exchange capabilities planned.
Afriex says its infrastructure processes more than US$600 million annually across more than 35 countries for remittance providers, payroll companies, ecommerce businesses, fintechs, banks and enterprises.

The Aug. 17 trigger is the public disclosure of the operating relationship, not the date the partnership became effective. The substance sits underneath Afriex's payment API: sponsor banking, settlement access and regulatory coverage determine how reliably the platform can connect local payment rails with international money movement. For cross-border fintechs, those banking relationships remain core infrastructure even when customers experience the service through a single API.

Insurance And Insurtech

Munich Re Agrees To Acquire Cyber Insurtech At-Bay For US$575M

August 19, 2026, United States / Germany

Munich Re agreed to acquire U.S. cyber-insurtech At-Bay at an enterprise value of US$575 million, with closing expected in the first quarter of 2027 subject to regulatory approvals and other customary conditions.
At-Bay had US$278 million in gross written premiums at the end of 2025, employs approximately 280 people and provides insurance and security services to close to 40,000 U.S. businesses.
The business will sit under Hartford Steam Boiler within Munich Re Specialty, combining cyber underwriting with continuous monitoring, risk mitigation and security technology.

The acquisition puts insurance capacity, underwriting data and active cyber defence inside the same operating structure. At-Bay already monitors insured risk throughout the policy lifecycle, giving Munich Re a platform that can influence both loss prevention and pricing rather than relying only on claims experience after an incident. That integration could become more important as cyber insurers compete on the quality of the security controls wrapped around coverage.

SME Finance And Business Banking

Boost Launches Integrated Banking Payments And Financing Platform For Malaysian SMEs

August 18, 2026, Malaysia

Boost launched Boost SME, a fully digital business banking platform combining accounts, payment acceptance and financing for Malaysian small businesses.
Businesses can open an account in as little as five minutes and receive same-day DuitNow QR settlements, including on weekends and Malaysian public holidays.
Financing includes Merchant Cash Advance and Boost Bank Biz Loans of up to RM300,000, with approvals advertised as fast as 10 minutes and disbursement as fast as 24 hours after acceptance.

Boost is putting banking, merchant payments and credit inside one operating interface for small businesses rather than distributing them as separate products. Same-day settlement can feed directly into cash management while transaction history can sit closer to financing decisions. For SMEs, the value depends on whether that integration reduces the time between making a sale, receiving usable funds and obtaining working capital when it is needed.

Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime

Capco Finds 36% Of Canadians Faced Attempted Payment Fraud

August 2026, Canada

Capco surveyed 1,000 Canadian consumers and found 36% had experienced an attempted payment fraud during the previous two years.
Security was identified as an important factor when choosing a financial institution by 60% of respondents, while advanced fraud protection was selected by 46%.
Only 33% were very confident their primary financial institution would protect them from payment fraud, while 52% said their institution had not informed them about deepfake payment threats or they could not recall receiving that guidance.

Canada's move toward faster payments compresses the time available to detect scams before money leaves an account. The survey shows that consumers already put security ahead of speed and convenience, while confidence in fraud protection remains uneven. As Real Time Rail testing and access advance, banks and payment providers will need fraud controls that work across identity, accounts and transaction channels rather than relying mainly on intervention after a suspicious payment has been completed.

Hong Kong SFC Tightens Controls Around eDDA Deposits

August 20, 2026, Hong Kong

The Securities and Futures Commission issued controls for licensed corporations, virtual-asset service providers and associated entities using simplified electronic Direct Debit Authorisation to receive client deposits.
When a payer bank does not confirm an authorization directly with the account owner, the licensed firm initiating the arrangement bears primary responsibility for obtaining proper authorization and may face related indemnity claims.
Firms should verify account ownership, consider small-value verification transfers, apply transaction limits or withholding periods, use stronger authentication where appropriate and decline instructions when required checks cannot be completed.
Specified warning signs include rapid or unusually large deposits, activity inconsistent with a client’s profile, new wallet addresses added around an eDDA setup and deposits quickly converted into virtual assets for withdrawal.

The circular connects Faster Payment System deposits directly to trading-account and virtual-asset controls. Efficient funding depends on whether firms can verify ownership, stop suspicious instructions and manage the liability attached to simplified authorization.

AUSTRAC Finds Coordinated Mortgage Fraud Across Major Australian Banks

August 19, 2026, Australia

AUSTRAC's Fintel Alliance analysed data from 10 major Australian banks and identified potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in suspected fraudulent mortgage loans, with much of the activity linked to properties in Sydney.
Operation Claw found recurring use of inflated incomes, misrepresented employment, fabricated business activity and false or misleading documents across multiple lenders.
Participating banks have used the intelligence to investigate potentially fraudulent loans, strengthen controls and make referrals, while AUSTRAC has shared relevant names and entities with regulatory and law-enforcement agencies.

The investigation shows why mortgage fraud controls cannot rely only on what one lender can see inside its own book. Repeated brokers, accountants, law firms, documents and funding patterns became more visible when information from multiple banks was analysed together. For lenders, that strengthens the case for shared intelligence and earlier detection before questionable loans are approved and funds become harder to recover.

SafePal Data Breach Exposes Order Details For Nearly 40,000 Customers

August 16, 2026, Global

SafePal disclosed unauthorized access to customer order information affecting approximately 39,798 people who placed orders between March 2, 2025 and April 11, 2026.
The exposed data included names, email addresses, shipping addresses, phone numbers and purchase details. SafePal says seed phrases, private keys, wallet passwords, payment-card data and access to customer funds were not compromised.
SafePal fixed the order-tracking authorization flaw, shortened relevant data retention to 90 days and says it has taken down more than 30 fraudulent websites and phishing links connected with scam activity.

Hardware wallet security now extends beyond protecting private keys. Order records can identify where crypto holders live and what they purchased, creating targeted phishing, impersonation and physical-security risks even when the wallet itself remains secure. That adds a customer-data layer to the self custody security risks already exposed by device and firmware failures.

Risk Compliance And Regtech

APRA Adds Quantum, Platform And Stored Value Risks To Plan

August 20, 2026, Australia

APRA published its 2026–27 Corporate Plan, setting priorities for the next four years and a policy and supervision agenda covering the next 12 to 18 months.
Supervision will examine resilience to AI-enabled cyber threats, quantum-computing risk and concentrated reliance on common technology platforms and material service providers.
APRA also plans to develop a prudential framework for large stored-value facility providers and work with ASIC on implementation guidance, subject to the Australian government completing the relevant reforms.

APRA’s earlier focus on AI risk governance now extends to shared technology dependencies and stored-value infrastructure. Banks, fintech vendors and wallet providers should expect closer scrutiny of resilience, provider concentration and accountability across outsourced systems.

Weekly Close

Like the several past months, this week’s Whisperer shows financial infrastructure becoming more integrated, more programmable and more regulated at the same time. The edge is going to firms that can combine distribution, trusted controls and ownership of the infrastructure underneath payments, AI, digital assets and capital markets without adding friction faster than they add capability.

NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets. Get the weekly Whisperer and related market intelligence through NCFA's newsletter, view the latest fintech insights, industry research, or launch into emerging financial innovation opportunities.

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 21, 2026 Blockchain, Crypto, Digital Assets Regulations, Blockchain, Crypto, Digital Assets, Tokens, CBDCs, Stablecoins, Metaverse, NFTs, Enterprise, Scaleup, Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, Small Businesses, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Legal Issues, Regulation, Consultation, Marketing, Strategy, Growth, Design, Regtech, Compliance, Governance, Stories, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

Almost $4 Billion Shows What Lower Securities Friction Can Do

August 21, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Competition And Market Structure

LIFE Financing Rose Eightfold After Canada Increased Exemption Limits

On August 18, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators published its 2025–2026 Year in Review. One capital formation result stands out. After regulators increased the limits for the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption, hundreds of listed issuers used it to raise almost $4 billion in the first year, at eight times the pace under the original limits.

That is unusually useful regulatory evidence. It doesn't prove the higher limits caused every additional financing, since issuer demand and market conditions also affect activity. But the market used the exemption far more heavily after regulators made it more practical. The result also strengthens a larger question NCFA recently explored around whether Canada can turn access into productive participation rather than stopping at permission on paper.

NCFA reviewed the expanded LIFE exemption when the CSA initially increased how much eligible listed companies could raise without preparing a prospectus for each financing.

The new usage data take that reform beyond policy design. Companies had a less burdensome financing route available and hundreds chose to use it.

Hundreds Of Listed Issuers Raised Almost $4 Billion Through LIFE

The LIFE exemption gives eligible reporting issuers a more efficient way to raise public capital while retaining specified disclosure and investor protections. This matters most when the fixed costs of a conventional financing become large relative to the amount a smaller company needs to raise. A financing route can exist legally and still see limited use if its cost, complexity or timing makes the economics unattractive.

The first year under the higher limits provides evidence that those economics are essential. Hundreds of issuers used LIFE and almost $4 billion was raised, compared with a much lower pace under the previous limits. The important result is not simply that Canada permitted more financing. Issuers actually used the additional room.

That gives regulators a stronger basis for the next round of evaluation. Which companies used LIFE, how large were the financings, what did it cost them to raise the money, how did investors fare and how much activity would have occurred through another route anyway? Those questions can help distinguish a rule that merely looks simpler from one that materially improves capital formation.

CSA Widens Investor Access And Cuts Reporting Costs For Smaller Issuers

The CSA is reducing different forms of friction elsewhere in the market. Eligible venture issuers with less than $10 million in annual revenue can voluntarily file financial results semiannually rather than quarterly under an interim regime. Regulators can use what they learn from that regime when considering permanent rules, making issuer cost and actual market use part of the feedback process.

The proposed self certified investor exemption approaches participation from the investor side. People who satisfy specified education or experience criteria could invest even if they don't meet the financial thresholds for accredited investors, with investments capped at $50,000 per calendar year across multiple businesses. The proposal would give Canadian issuers another potential source of private capital while widening access for investors regulators believe have enough knowledge or experience to understand the risks.

Accredited investor rules largely use wealth and income as proxies for the ability to bear risk, while the proposed exemption would also recognize relevant knowledge or experience. If adopted, its value should eventually be judged by more than the number of investors who become legally eligible. Issuer uptake, investment activity, losses, complaints and other investor outcomes would show whether wider access produces a useful market.

Project Tokenization Brings More Than 240 Organizations Into CSA Work

The same focus on actual market use is reaching new securities infrastructure. NCFA covered the launch of Project Tokenization when the CSA opened stakeholder engagement through the Collaboratory and identified a possible route toward live testing. The CSA now says the project has engaged more than 240 organizations spanning issuers, fintech companies, custodians, marketplaces, clearing agencies, professional firms and other participants.

The CSA Collaboratory gives novel products and market structures a way to engage regulators before launch and can support controlled testing where appropriate. That's important because tokenized securities depend on more than an issuer receiving permission to create a digital asset. Custody, ownership records, trading, settlement, compliance and investor protection all have to work well enough for a product to operate economically.

Tokenization is a more complex extension of the LIFE lesson. LIFE shows what happened after one capital raising constraint was relaxed. The U.S. is also reconsidering how securities rules apply to crypto asset capital raising, including proposals that could expand how much eligible issuers can raise under lighter offering requirements. In Canada, Project Tokenization can show whether regulators and market participants can identify which requirements are essential, which need adapting and which create enough cost or uncertainty to prevent otherwise viable infrastructure from being built here.

Ontario Plans To Join Canada's Securities Passport System

Ontario's commitment to join Canada's securities passport system tackles another longstanding source of friction. Our Ontario securities passport story traced how the province moved from pursuing a national regulator to joining the existing passport model. The CSA says Ontario's participation is intended to strengthen national harmonization, remove interprovincial barriers and reduce regulatory burden for companies doing business across Canada.

For firms operating nationally, duplicated provincial processes can become an operating cost even when the underlying securities requirements are similar. The useful evidence after Ontario joins will be whether companies encounter less duplication, lower compliance costs and easier national market access. Regulatory reform becomes much more informative when policymakers can compare what they changed with what companies and investors actually did afterward.

Lower friction does not mean removing protections wherever market participants find them expensive. The CSA issued 763 investor alerts, cautions and warnings during the year, more than 85% involving crypto assets, and facilitated the deactivation of 11,728 malicious investment websites representing 19,860 URLs.

Some rules clearly protect investors and market integrity. Others may now be costing the market more than they protect.

LIFE gives Canada a rare piece of evidence about that balance. Almost $4 billion and an eightfold increase in financing activity give regulators a reason to look for other places where better calibrated rules could produce more usable markets without sacrificing the protections that keep those markets credible.

Talking Point

If higher LIFE limits were followed by an eightfold increase in capital raised through the exemption, which other securities rules should Canada now test against actual issuer and investor behaviour?

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 21, 2026 Cyber Security, Quantum, Hacks, Fraud Alerts, Risks, InsurTech, Enterprise, Scaleup, Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, Small Businesses, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech and Healthcare, Fintech Services, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Marketing, Strategy, Growth, Design, Personal Finance, Tech, Tools, Productivity No comments

How Fintech Is Redefining Employee Health Benefits in Canada

August 21, 2026

Employee benefits have undergone a quiet technological transformation. Not long ago, managing a health benefits plan meant paper forms, printed receipts, mailed claims, and significant administrative work for employers and employees. Over time, insurance providers digitized much of the process. Employees could submit claims online, access their coverage through a website, and eventually manage their benefits from a mobile device.

Today, another shift is taking place. The rise of digital financial infrastructure is making it possible for businesses to rethink not only how benefits are administered, but also what type of benefit they provide in the first place. Instead of purchasing a traditional insurance plan and paying recurring premiums to an insurance provider, some businesses are choosing a Health Spending Account, where the employer establishes a healthcare spending budget and employees are reimbursed for eligible expenses. This development is closely connected to the broader evolution of fintech.

From Paper Forms to Digital Benefits

Traditional employee benefits were built around an insurance model. An employer purchased coverage from an insurer, employees received a defined set of benefits, and claims were processed through the insurance provider. For decades, much of the administration surrounding that process was paper-based. Employees might fill out claim forms, collect receipts, submit documentation, and wait for reimbursement.

The internet gradually changed that process. Insurance providers began offering online portals where employees could submit claims electronically, view coverage details, and track reimbursements. Electronic payments replaced cheques, while digital records replaced much of the paperwork that had previously been required to administer a benefits plan.

The underlying insurance product remained largely the same, but the infrastructure surrounding it became digital. This was an important first step in the digitization of employee benefits, but it also raised a bigger question: if technology can digitize the administration of benefits, can it also change the underlying model?

Beyond Digitizing Insurance

Fintech has repeatedly demonstrated that digitizing an existing process is only the beginning. Payments are a good example. Businesses moved from cash and cheques to credit cards, online banking, electronic funds transfers, and automated payments. Accounting moved from desktop software and paper records to cloud-based platforms, while lending increasingly moved online, with applications, underwriting, and funding taking place digitally.

These developments created something more important than convenience: new financial infrastructure. Once the infrastructure exists, businesses can build entirely new products and services on top of it.

See:

The same thing is happening with employee benefits. Modern benefits platforms can connect employers, employees, financial institutions, and payment systems through software. Claims can be submitted digitally, reviewed electronically, and reimbursed through electronic funds transfer. Once these pieces of infrastructure exist, businesses have more options than simply purchasing a traditional insurance product.

Separating the Benefit From the Insurance Product

This is where Health Spending Accounts become particularly interesting from a fintech perspective. A traditional health insurance plan transfers a defined set of healthcare risks to an insurance provider. The employer pays premiums in exchange for coverage according to the terms of the insurance policy.

An HSA takes a different approach. The employer establishes a defined healthcare spending allocation for employees, and employees submit eligible expenses for reimbursement, subject to the rules of the plan. Rather than purchasing an insurance product that provides a predetermined package of coverage, technology can provide the infrastructure needed to administer a defined healthcare budget.

This distinction opens up an entirely different model for employee benefits. The business can establish the amount it wants to make available, while employees have greater flexibility in how they use that benefit within the eligible expense rules.

Why This Wasn't Always Practical

The concept of giving employees a healthcare spending allowance is not new. What has changed is the infrastructure required to administer it efficiently.

Imagine an employer with 20 employees trying to manage an HSA using paper forms and cheques. Every claim would require documentation. Someone would need to review the expense, calculate the reimbursement, record the transaction, update the employee's available balance, and issue payment. The administrative burden could quickly outweigh the benefit of the flexibility.

Digital infrastructure changes that equation. An employee can submit a claim online, upload supporting documentation, and have the claim reviewed through a centralized platform. The employee's available balance can be updated electronically, while approved reimbursements can be sent directly to their bank account. What once required multiple manual steps can now be handled through a single digital workflow.

Payments Infrastructure Is a Key Piece of the Puzzle

The evolution of electronic payments has been particularly important in making this model practical. Electronic funds transfer (EFT), pre-authorized debits (PADs), and other digital payment infrastructure allow money to move between businesses and individuals without paper cheques or manual bank transfers.

For an HSA platform, this infrastructure can operate on both sides of the transaction. When an employee submits an eligible claim, reimbursement can be sent electronically to their bank account. On the employer side, funds can be automatically withdrawn when claims are approved, allowing the business to fund reimbursements without manually paying an invoice for every transaction.

See: Canada Real-Time Rail Rules And Access Intelligence Guide

The result is a much more automated financial workflow: an employee submits a claim, the claim is reviewed, reimbursement is approved, funds are transferred electronically, and the employer's account is automatically debited. The development of these payment rails is an important part of what makes a digital, claims-based benefits model feasible at scale.

From Fixed Premiums to Usage-Based Benefits

Digital HSA platforms also introduce a different way for businesses to think about benefit costs. With a traditional insurance plan, employers generally pay recurring premiums for coverage, regardless of how much employees ultimately use the plan. An HSA can instead operate on a claims-based model, where the employer establishes a budget but funds are used as eligible claims are submitted.

This can provide small businesses with greater visibility and control over healthcare spending. Rather than paying a fixed premium for a predefined package of coverage, a business can establish how much it is prepared to allocate toward employee healthcare and allow employees to use that allocation for eligible expenses.

This reflects a broader fintech trend toward usage-based financial products. Businesses increasingly expect technology to provide more transparency into where money is going and to reduce the friction involved in moving and managing funds.

Employee Choice Becomes Part of the Product

The digital transformation of benefits is also changing the employee experience. Traditional insurance plans are designed around predefined coverage. An employee may have coverage for certain services but little or no use for others.

An HSA can approach the problem differently. Instead of deciding exactly which healthcare services employees should use, the employer establishes a budget and employees decide how to use that budget among eligible expenses. One employee might use their allocation primarily for dental expenses, while another might have significant vision, physiotherapy, or prescription medication expenses.

This creates a more personalized benefit without requiring the employer to manually manage every reimbursement. The software handles the administrative infrastructure while the employee has greater choice over how to use the benefit.

Fintech Is Changing the Role of the Middleman

This shift reflects a broader pattern across financial technology. Fintech does not always eliminate traditional financial institutions, but it can change where value is created and which parts of a financial transaction require an intermediary.

Digital payment platforms have reduced the need for businesses to rely on traditional payment processes. Online lending platforms have created alternatives to traditional lending channels. Digital investment platforms have reduced some of the friction involved in accessing financial markets.

Similarly, digital benefits infrastructure gives businesses an alternative to relying exclusively on traditional insurance-based employee benefits. The opportunity is not simply to make insurance administration faster. It is to allow businesses to choose a fundamentally different way of delivering healthcare benefits.

This is an important distinction. The innovation is not necessarily that an insurance product has become easier to use online. It is that the availability of digital claims administration and payment infrastructure makes it possible for a business to consider a different financial model altogether.

The Opportunity for Small Businesses

This evolution is particularly relevant to small businesses. Large companies have traditionally had access to dedicated benefits teams, negotiated insurance plans, and significant administrative resources. A five-person business typically does not have those resources.

Digital platforms can make sophisticated financial and benefits infrastructure accessible to businesses that previously would not have had the resources or administrative capacity to manage it themselves. A small business can establish a defined benefit budget, provide employees with access to a digital claims platform, and use electronic payments without building the infrastructure internally.

That can change the competitive landscape. A small business may not be able to compete with a large corporation on salary alone, but it can potentially offer a flexible digital health benefit that employees can use according to their individual needs. Technology effectively lowers the administrative barrier to offering that benefit.

The Next Stage of Digital Benefits

The evolution of employee benefits follows a familiar fintech pattern. First, the paper process was digitized. Then the user experience moved online. Now the underlying financial model itself is being reconsidered.

Health Spending Accounts are one example of what becomes possible when digital claims administration, cloud software, automated payments, and electronic banking infrastructure come together. For businesses considering this approach, understanding how Health Spending Accounts work is an important step in evaluating whether a digital, claims-based benefit model makes sense for their workforce.

The important development is not simply that employees can submit a claim from their phone instead of filling out a form. It is that technology has made it possible to rethink the relationship between employers, employees, insurers, and healthcare spending altogether.

As fintech continues to develop, more financial products may follow the same path: from paper, to digital, to fundamentally different. Employee benefits may be one of the clearest examples of that transition already underway.

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 20, 2026 FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech and Networking Events, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Marketing, Strategy, Growth, Design, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

Canada Fintech Forum 2026 Returns to Montréal September 14–15

August 20, 2026 | NCFA Resource | FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fintech and Networking Events, Artificial Intelligence And Data

Two Days of Fintech, Finance and Innovation in Montréal

On September 14 and 15, 2026, the Canada Fintech Forum 2026 returns to Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth in Montréal. Organized by Station Fintech and powered by Finance Montréal, the Forum brings together leaders from financial institutions, fintechs, investment, technology and the public sector. NCFA is supporting the forum as a visibility partner for this year's Forum and will be sharing event and program updates with Canada's fintech community ahead of September.

CANADA FINTECH FORUM 2026

September 14–15, 2026 · Montréal

Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth

1,500+ Attendees · 70 Speakers · 120 Startups

Day 1· Open & Embedded Finance

Day 2· Enterprise Infrastructure & AI

REGISTER NOW

What's On the 2026 Program?

The preliminary program divides the Forum into two focused days, beginning with open and embedded finance before turning to enterprise infrastructure and artificial intelligence.

Day 1 · September 14 · Open & Embedded Finance

The first day examines how new data access, payment rails and embedded financial products are changing competition and distribution. Sessions include the market effects of open finance, the future of Canada's payments ecosystem from real-time payments to stablecoins, autonomous transactions, sustainable finance and the risks and oversight questions surrounding embedded credit.

Several of those discussions connect directly with developments already underway in Canada. Canada open banking intelligence tracks the proposed consumer-driven banking rules now defining data access, accreditation, consent and liability, while Canada's financial infrastructure opening follows the parallel expansion of payments access and new market participation.

Day 2 · September 15 · Enterprise Infrastructure & AI

The second day focuses on how financial institutions are deploying and governing new technology inside regulated operations. Topics include AI-driven financial decision making, AI-native finance versus legacy systems, RegTech automation, the growing AI cybersecurity arms race and whether financial institutions are ready for quantum computing.

Featured Speakers

The current speaker lineup brings together senior leaders from banking, insurance, fintech and artificial intelligence. Confirmed speakers include

Michael Denham, Executive Vice-President and Vice-Chair at National Bank of Canada
Maksims Volkovs, SVP and Chief AI Scientist at TD
Tess Bloch, Co-Founder and COO of Spade
Peter Zaffino, Chairman and CEO of AIG

The broader Forum is designed to bring financial institutions and fintech companies into direct conversation with investors, regulators, technology providers and other ecosystem participants.

Why Attend

The Forum is built around business access as much as conference content. Attendees can compare market priorities with decision makers, identify potential customers and partners, meet investors and fintech founders, and get a clearer view of what financial institutions are looking to buy, build or integrate next.

Networking includes curated business meetings and dedicated spaces for exchanges between institutions, fintechs and investors. September 14 also includes ElleFintech, a fireside-chat breakfast highlighting fintech companies founded or led by women.

For fintech founders, the concentration of 120 expected startups alongside major financial institutions and investors creates a vibrant opportunity to test market assumptions, build relationships and understand where buyers and capital providers are placing their attention.

Registration

Reserve your seat. Register for the Canada Fintech Forum 2026 Now

Eligible fintech startups can apply for 75% off registration for up to two attendees per company -> Apply for the startup rate.

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

August 20, 2026 Enterprise, Scaleup, Entrepreneurs, Start-ups, Small Businesses, Fintech AI/ML, Data-driven, Automation, Generative AI, FinTech and Alternative Finance, Fundraising, Investing, Trading, Innovation and Resources, Leadership, Competition, Human Capital, Health, Stories, Tech, Tools, Productivity, Venture Funding and Building No comments

Bank of Canada Finds Hiring Weakness In AI Exposed Jobs

August 20, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Public Sector Policy And Industrial Strategy

Weaker Hiring In Jobs With Greater AI Exposure

On August 20, 2026, Bank of Canada research on AI and Canadian hiring shows that people coming from occupations with greater artificial intelligence exposure are having a harder time finding work than people coming from less exposed occupations. During 2015 to 2019, the estimated job finding rate at the fully exposed end of the Bank's model was 2.2 percentage points lower than at the unexposed end. In 2025, it was 13.9 points lower. The comparable difference in job separation rates barely changed.

The Bank isn't saying AI alone caused the gap. The pandemic, immigration, trade changes and weaker labour market conditions also affected hiring. What stands out is where the difference appears. People in more exposed occupations aren't leaving or losing jobs much faster, but those trying to find work are having more difficulty getting hired.

Getting Hired May Weaken Before Jobs Disappear

The occupations near the top of the Bank's exposure ranking are heavy on information work. Data entry clerks, receptionists, payroll administrators and accounting clerks, banking and insurance clerks, records management staff, customer service representatives and office support workers all rank highly. Jobs that depend more on physical work, specialized human skills or judgment generally rank lower.

The Bank estimates the relationship using Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey data and occupation level AI exposure scores. No workers in the data sit at exactly 0% or 100% exposure, so those endpoints are estimates rather than two observed groups of workers. The Bank describes the comparison as an upper bound.

Statistics Canada research on AI and employment provides an important check. Employment generally grew from November 2022 through December 2025 across occupations with different levels of potential AI exposure. Vacancies in highly exposed occupations where AI may replace more tasks also fell at a similar rate to vacancies in occupations with lower exposure.

See AI Usage Data Shows Early Labour Market Strain

Those findings can coexist. Overall employment can hold up while people trying to enter or reenter some occupations take longer to get hired. The Bank also finds that younger workers are more concentrated than older workers in several occupations with moderate or high AI exposure. That puts more attention on entry points into the labour market, not just on whether established workers are being laid off.

Companies Can Reduce Hiring Without Large Layoffs

A company doesn't need a large round of layoffs to use less labour. It can replace fewer people who leave, open fewer junior positions or use the same team to handle more work. The Bank's August data show why layoff announcements alone are a poor measure of the employment effect.

A separate Bank of Canada survey of Canadian firms points in the same direction. Firms expected AI to have little effect on employment over the following year but modest net negative effects over three years. They expected the impact to build over time rather than arrive as an immediate employment shock.

New Bank of Canada evidence on business AI adoption adds another layer. More than two-thirds of surveyed business leaders said they personally use AI in a typical work week, but only 8% of businesses reported significant AI use in core operations. Over the next three years, 23% expect AI to reduce employment while 11% expect a positive employment effect. That suggests hiring effects could emerge before broad operational transformation is complete, leaving a sizeable gap between using AI tools and redesigning businesses around them.

If AI lets companies produce more with existing teams, labour demand can weaken first through vacancies, replacement hiring and junior recruitment. If those measures deteriorate in the occupations where AI use is rising fastest, the case for an AI related employment effect gets stronger. If they recover with the rest of the labour market, it gets weaker.

See Can Headline Inflation Hide AI Job Losses?

The Bank of Canada July AI employment paper approached the issue through an economic model rather than observed labour market outcomes. It separates AI that helps workers produce more from automation that transfers tasks away from workers. Both reduce labour demand in the model, with the larger effect coming when machines take over tasks. The August research adds observed Canadian labour data without proving that AI caused the hiring gap.

Finance Shows How The Job Mix Can Change

Finance is a useful place to watch because AI use is already high and several financial jobs rank among the Bank's more exposed occupations. Statistics Canada found that 40.4% of finance and insurance businesses used AI to produce goods or deliver services during the previous 12 months, more than twice the 19.2% Canadian business average.

The Bank's 2026 Financial System Survey shows a similar pattern among major financial organizations. Nearly all 54 respondents reported using AI, although most still described adoption as limited or moderate. They generally use it to complete existing tasks faster while keeping people responsible for critical decisions carrying financial, legal or reputational consequences.

Financial firms also have an implementation problem. In the Bank survey, 58% of respondents reported difficulty integrating AI into existing systems and workflows. Another 56% cited weak AI literacy among current employees or difficulty hiring and retaining people with specific AI expertise.

Governed financial AI workflows show why both things can happen at once. Software can collect information, compare records, prepare research, identify accounting breaks and assemble know your customer files before a person reviews the work or makes the decision. A firm may need less manual work around a process while placing more value on employees who understand the business well enough to challenge the output.

That becomes especially important for junior roles. Employees have traditionally learned finance by preparing files, reconciling records, reviewing documents, gathering evidence and completing first pass analysis before taking responsibility for harder decisions. AI's hidden costs in replacing junior workers include weakening some of those early career training routes. If AI removes more of that routine work, firms may eventually need fewer junior hires while still competing for experienced analysts, operators, compliance professionals and risk managers.

Current evidence doesn't show that this has happened across Canadian finance. It does show high AI use, exposed information work and shortages of people with the skills to implement and oversee the technology. For founders, financial institutions and investors, the employment question is therefore bigger than how many jobs AI eliminates. It's also about which jobs companies stop adding, which skills become more valuable and how firms build experienced people when some of the work that trained them is automated.

Talking Point

If AI reduces the number of people companies need to hire before it reduces existing headcount, how quickly will Canada's employment data show the change?

Buying a Canadian MSB and Reviewing FINTRAC RPAA and Financial Due Diligence

Why MSCI Is Removing Strategy From Its Indexes

How Is Crypto Market Cap Calculated? What a Change in the Top Coins Really Tells You

What Happens When AI Agents Start Trading Together?

Canada’s VC Totals Are Reliant On Mega Deals

Why Canada Is Making It Cheaper to Leave Your Bank

CSA Tokenization Report Shows Where Canada May Scale First

Creative Ways to Boost Team Morale

Webull Adds Free Data as Canadian Brokers Compete Beyond Fees

BBVA Deploys Canadian AI for Derivatives Pricing

S4 EP67 Chris Maranis, Deputy CEO, EXUS

Over 6000+ Articles
Over 6000+ Articles

Sep 15: Canada Investment Summit 2026 PM Carney Opening RemarksNo. of Hits : 6463
Feb 8, 2026 Ramp Super Bowl Ad: Multiple What's PossibleNo. of Hits : 22927
Jan 20: PM Mark Carney, WEF 2026 Speech, DavosNo. of Hits : 21957

Some NCFA Advisors
Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Lynn Johannson, Advisor, Sustainability and ESG
January 4th, 2024
Lynn Johannson, President of E2 Management Corporation and Catalyst for THE Collaboration In a care[...]
Rojin Nair, Advisor
June 1st, 2021
At Incyub8 Inc, Rojin is focusing on nurturing and guiding various national and international start-[...]
David Durand, Advisor, Innovation and Advocacy
September 9th, 2020
David Durand, LL.L., B.Sc. chem., – Founder and Managing Partner of Durand Lawyers – Lawyer (Québec)[...]
Charlene Cieslik, Advisor, AML and Compliance
July 9th, 2018
Charlene Cieslik is the Principle of Complifact AML Inc., and currently spends her time assisting th[...]
Alan Wunsche, Advisor, Blockchain
January 3rd, 2018
Alan Wunsche Alan Wunsche, MBA, CPA, CA, CBP – Founder, TokenFunder and Co-founder/Chair, Blockchai[...]
David Lucatch, Advisor
September 25th, 2017
David Lucatch Serial Entrepreneur, Marketer, Startup Evangelist, Investor & Mentor David[...]
Jason Saltzman, Advisor, Securities and Financings
June 20th, 2017
Jason Saltzman is a partner in Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP’s Toronto office practising in corporate fin[...]
Robin Ford, Advisor, Governance and Regulation
May 10th, 2017
Robin Ford Bio (2017) After 25 years as a public sector lawyer and regulator, Robin is now consul[...]
Bundeep Rangar, Advisor, Global Debt Markets
December 14th, 2016
Bundeep Singh Rangar has more than 20 years' combined experience in finance, banking, consultancy, t[...]