Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
September 15, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Competition And Market Structure, Public Sector Policy And Industrial Strategy

Today, on September 15, 2026, Canada's first Canada Investment Summit 2026 commitments reached nearly $500 billion across Canadian pension funds, insurers, banks, investment funds and a major AI infrastructure project. The September 14–15 summit in Toronto also brought together investors from nearly 30 countries managing more than $100 trillion in assets.
The $500 billion isn't one pool of foreign equity. It combines institutional investment, bank financing and capital mobilization, investment funds and corporate infrastructure spending. A large share comes from Canadian institutions putting more capital to work at home while Ottawa tries to attract additional global investment.
These commitments work in different ways. Bank financing, pension investment, venture capital and corporate spending support different types of projects and companies. Together, they give Canadian businesses and infrastructure projects more ways to access capital.
Canadian institutions already invest a lot of money outside Canada. The Bank of Canada recently estimated that pension funds, insurers, investment funds and banks have about C$500 billion invested in private credit, much of it abroad. The summit is trying to put more of that Canadian capital to work at home.
Investment funds added more than $14 billion. Power Sustainable committed to invest and mobilize more than $10 billion for infrastructure including power, grids, fibre, data and food supply chains. Radical Ventures plans to invest and mobilize $4 billion through its new Radical Breakouts Fund for Canadian AI scaleups.
Bell Canada and Saskatchewan also announced an AI infrastructure project of up to $52.5 billion. The proposed 1.2-gigawatt AI hub is expected to create more than 4,500 jobs across construction, operations, management and related services.
Another September 15 announcement lowers the tax cost of making new business investments. Ottawa's proposed Productivity Mega Deduction would let businesses write off roughly two-thirds of eligible capital investments right away, up from about 15% under the earlier Productivity Super-Deduction.
Most qualifying assets bought on or after September 15, 2026 would be covered. That includes software, computers, fibre-optic cable, mining property, certain pipelines, aircraft, vehicles, patents, rail track, bridges and roads. Most buildings, goodwill and some vehicles would remain outside the main rules or receive different treatment.
Finance Canada estimates the change would cut Canada's effective tax rate on new business investment to 6.4% (from 13.0%). For comparison, it estimates the U.S. rate at 16.9% and the OECD average excluding Canada at 19.0%.
This isn't just an incentive for foreign investors. Canadian and international companies could both benefit when they make qualifying investments in Canada.
The federal government estimates the measure would reduce tax revenue by $36 billion over five years. Finance Canada also estimates that about $8.5 billion a year in investment support could eventually generate up to roughly $22 billion in additional annual economic activity. The final impact will be based on how much new investment follows and whether it lifts output and productivity.
The Canada Revenue Agency has also begun prioritizing advance tax rulings for proposed Canadian investments of $1 billion or more. Investors can seek binding tax treatment before committing capital, reducing one source of uncertainty on large projects.
Statistics Canada productivity research found investment per worker in 2022 was nearly 20% below its 2014 level. Real non-residential business investment in early 2024 was still 22% below its peak a decade earlier, and weak capital investment has been a major contributor to slower labour-productivity growth.
The latest business surveys are more encouraging. Bank of Canada survey data show 43% of firms in the second quarter of 2026 identified improving productivity as an investment objective, up from 31% a year earlier. Equipment upgrades, technology adoption and AI investment give companies ways to convert financing into higher output rather than simply expanding balance sheets.
Foreign capital is also rising. Statistics Canada recorded $96.8 billion of foreign direct investment into Canada in 2025, the highest annual level since 2007. In the second quarter of 2026, inward direct investment reached $25.9 billion, up from $18.8 billion in the first quarter. Manufacturing attracted $7.0 billion and finance and insurance $6.6 billion.
Canada now has more domestic capital earmarked for Canadian assets at the same time that foreign direct investment is rising. Domestic institutions can finance assets and companies through longer investment cycles, while foreign capital adds outside balance sheets, customers, expertise and international connections.
Trade pressure adds another reason to build more productive capacity at home. Canadian companies looking beyond the United States still need capital for technology, production, regulatory work, new customers and foreign operations. Stronger financing at home gives more firms the option to build those capabilities from Canada rather than moving capital-intensive parts of their growth elsewhere. See: Budget 2025 Accelerates Fintech, AI, and Capital Growth
Video: CBC News coverage of Canada’s first Investment Summit, where nearly $500 billion in new investment commitments were announced.
For Canadian founders, the most accessible commitments are much smaller than the $500 billion headline. Radical Ventures' $4 billion AI fund, RBC's nearly $1.5 billion technology commitment and CIBC's $2 billion defence and dual-use program can reach companies below major infrastructure scale. Pension and bank commitments can finance the data centres, energy systems, digital infrastructure and customers around them.
Canada has plenty of capital on paper. It now needs to move the needle in funded projects, higher investment per worker, productive technology adoption, export capacity and Canadian companies reaching larger scale.
$500 billion gives Canada a large starting balance. How much is actually deployed, where it goes and what it produces will determine whether the summit becomes a capital-formation milestone or a very large collection of commitments.
Can Canada turn nearly $500 billion of new capital commitments and a proposed 6.4% investment tax rate into measurably higher productive investment, larger Canadian companies and stronger domestic and foreign capital flows?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Sep 15, 2026

Image credit: Pexels
Market volatility remains a persistent factor in wealth management, driving investors to seek strategies that balance capital stability with strategic diversification. While physical property has traditionally served as a tangible asset class, direct ownership often carries operational friction and localized concentration risk. Real estate funds present a structured alternative, pooling capital to access larger-scale assets under professional administration. However, evaluating these vehicles requires a realistic understanding of their risk profiles, liquidity terms, fee structures, and underlying statutory frameworks.
Managed real estate portfolios offer distinct operational benefits while introducing clear structural constraints:
While European Union institutions have increasingly pressured member states to restrict residency-by-investment programs, specific national jurisdictions maintain defined statutory pathways. Hungary’s Guest Investor Program offers a structured framework for international investors seeking European mobility alongside capital allocation.
Unlike former European programs that encouraged direct residential purchases—often driving up local housing prices—the Hungarian framework emphasizes institutional, regulated fund vehicles. Under this legal framework, securing a Hungary Golden Visa through real estate fund investment requires strict adherence to statutory criteria:
Long-term portfolio resilience requires evaluating operational realities beyond the initial statutory holding period:
Regulated real estate funds operate under strict prudential oversight, with the MNB supervising legal compliance, market solvency, and reporting standards. While professional management aims to optimize operational performance and generate targeted income distributions, yields are never guaranteed and remain subject to market conditions, management fee drag, and occupancy rates.
When integrated into a broader wealth strategy, managed real estate funds offer a transparent method for participating in property markets and achieving long-term mobility goals—provided investors align their liquidity expectations with the regulatory realities of the underlying vehicle.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
September 14, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Competition And Market Structure, Regulation And Policy, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding

On September 11, 2026, Superintendent Peter Routledge delivered a speech at the Economic Club of Canada, explaining how the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is refining its risk appetite. Financial resilience remains central, but OSFI is giving more weight to economic growth and competition when it decides whether a regulatory requirement is proportionate to the risk.
For financial technology firms, smaller banks, federal credit unions and prospective entrants, the commercial question is whether those decisions make Canada's regulated financial market easier to enter and compete in. Some fintechs may eventually seek a federal bank, trust or loan company structure. Others need regulated partners that can support new lending, payments or financial products without the economics forcing every partnership toward Canada's largest institutions.
OSFI is already changing parts of that equation. New entrants have a more structured approval process, selected capital requirements are being recalibrated and unnecessary supervisory material is being removed. The value to the market will depend on what happens to entry costs, operating economics and the number of credible competitors that reach customers.
OSFI's Streamlined Approvals Framework for Targeted New Entrants is one of the clearest examples of the new competition objective. Eligible provincial credit unions and firms with innovative or emerging banking models now enter a more defined process that begins with a readiness assessment before formal approval and operational preparation.
A clearer process can materially affect a startup's economics. Legal and advisory costs continue while an application is underway, and management time spent on regulatory work is time not spent building the business. Investors can also have capital tied up well before regulated revenue begins.
Peter Routledge, Superintendent, OSFI
"We aim to create a smoother, more accessible pathway for credible new entrants navigating the federal process, without lowering our standards."
Faster decisions would reduce uncertainty, but approval itself is a poor measure of competition. Approval only matters if those firms can operate, grow and compete once they enter the market. New institutions need enough customers and revenue to absorb regulatory costs while continuing to meet OSFI's prudential requirements.
This is especially relevant to fintechs that never become federally regulated institutions themselves. More smaller banks, trust companies and credit unions can create additional counterparties for new financial products. A fintech gains little from an open market on paper if only a handful of institutions can support the partnership economically.
Regulation weighs differently on a large bank and a smaller financial institution. A large bank can spread reporting and compliance expense across a vast customer base. A smaller competitor has fewer accounts and loans over which to recover the same fixed costs.
Capital rules affect the equation as well. OSFI's 2027 rules reduce the risk weight on unrated corporate small and medium sized enterprise exposures to 75% from 85%. The maximum exposure that can qualify as a small business entity for lower regulatory retail treatment also rises to $2.5 million from $1.5 million.
OSFI's 2027 package also changes the treatment of some corporate exposures, covered bonds, securitization and market risk. Category I and II small and medium sized banks can use simplified capital treatment for qualifying exposures, subject to limits. The rules also introduce a streamlined application process for smaller banks seeking approval to use internal credit models.
OSFI has made selected changes elsewhere, including residential development and covered bonds. The changes are targeted rather than a general reduction in capital standards. Their commercial significance comes from matching regulatory cost more closely to the risk an institution actually takes.
Peter Routledge, Superintendent, OSFI
"We seek to avoid the 'stability of the graveyard' in which a docile, risk-averse financial system impedes prosperous growth."
The effects aren't limited to banks. Fintechs also depend on smaller regulated institutions for partnerships, distribution and access to financial products. Smaller regulated institutions finance businesses, compete for deposits and provide services that fintechs build on top of. If prudential requirements consume more capital or operating expense than the underlying risk warrants, fewer institutions can compete effectively and fintechs have fewer potential partners.
OSFI is also removing material it considers redundant, obsolete or trivial. By April 2026, it said 52 documents and more than 600 pages had been eliminated. The result is lower recurring cost or less management time spent satisfying requirements that don't materially improve supervision.
Canada already has experience with regulators being asked to consider competition more explicitly. Ontario expanded the Ontario Securities Commission's mandate in 2021 to include fostering competitive capital markets and capital formation. NCFA reviewed that expanded growth duty in a comparison of pro innovation regulation in Canada and the UK. The OSC subsequently built out its Office of Economic Growth and Innovation and continued experimenting with regulatory relief and testing programs.
NCFA had been asking regulators to go further years earlier. Its 2018 OSC priorities submission called for better data and performance measures tied to market outcomes. Capital formation and compliance costs were among the measures that could show whether regulation was actually improving the market.
An innovation office can improve communication with a regulator, and an exemption can remove a specific obstacle. Neither proves that competition increased. If a business still cannot earn enough to support the cost of being regulated, the market doesn't gain a sustainable competitor.
Investment crowdfunding provides a useful example. A competitive framework should encourage new equity crowdfunding dealers and portals to enter the market in the first place. That requires economics that can support the people, technology and regulatory work needed to operate. If the cost and complexity of registration discourage new entrants before they launch, or make it difficult for existing firms to reach sustainable scale, competition will remain limited.
NCFA raised similar concerns in its 2018 submission to Finance Canada, where regulatory fragmentation and compliance costs were identified as barriers to fintech growth. The association looked at the same issue in a a more recent analysis of financial market access and productive growth. Access has economic value when firms can turn it into customers, capital and competitive products.
Provincial regulators can make their competition mandates easier to evaluate by publishing more market outcomes. Approval times can be compared before and after reforms. Regulators can show how many entrants begin operating and whether they remain active. They can also disclose enough data to assess whether smaller firms are raising more capital or taking a larger role in the market.
Those metrics would distinguish regulatory activity from competitive results. Supporting fifty firms through an innovation office is useful information. Knowing how many of those firms reached the market, survived and won customers tells stakeholders much more about whether the mandate is working.
Routledge addressed the issue directly at the Scotiabank Financials Summit on September 10.
Peter Routledge, Superintendent, OSFI:
"Our role is to ensure the prudential framework does not create unnecessary barriers to responsible competition."
OSFI already has a decent starting point because its new approvals process includes a public dashboard. Processing times can show whether regulatory entry becomes faster and more predictable. OSFI could also report how many applicants become operating institutions and how long they remain active.
OSFI should also show whether smaller institutions are actually seeing lower regulatory costs, better funding access and more room to compete. If proportional supervision is working (or not), those changes should be visible in recurring compliance costs, capital use and funding outcomes.
Market performance should complete the picture. A new entrant that reaches customers and grows while maintaining strong capital is evidence that entry and resilience can coexist. A faster application process followed by few successful competitors would point to remaining barriers elsewhere.
Canada's largest banks will retain substantial advantages in distribution and customer scale. OSFI cannot remove those commercial strengths, nor should it try. Its role is to ensure that prudential requirements don't add an unnecessary regulatory advantage on top of them.
OSFI's revised risk appetite only matters if it changes who can compete and at what cost. More credible entrants, lower unnecessary regulatory burden and better funding economics would be stronger evidence of success than faster approvals alone (provided financial resilience remains intact).
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Sep 14, 2026

Industrial machinery is essential in the manufacturing, construction, processing, agriculture, energy production, and other industries.
Unexpected machine failures can have more than repair costs. Production can be halted, deadlines can be missed, workers can face safety hazards, and businesses can suffer financial losses.
By knowing the common causes of machinery failure, operators and maintenance staff can identify problems early and take preventive action. Industrial machinery failure can have many causes.
By determining the root cause, businesses can avoid the same issue, minimize downtime, and extend the useful life of valuable industrial equipment. Here are 10 of the most common reasons for industrial machinery failure.
One of the biggest causes of equipment failure is poor maintenance. A machine has many moving parts and interdependent components that must be inspected, cleaned, adjusted, and serviced regularly. Small issues can turn into big ones if they aren't addressed during routine maintenance.
A preventive maintenance schedule can help to detect worn components and other issues before they lead to unexpected failures.
Moving parts need proper lubrication to minimize friction and heat. Insufficient lubrication, improper lubricants, or not lubricating parts as recommended can cause faster wear.
Too much lubrication can also cause issues due to contamination or harm to some parts. Therefore, operators should adhere to the manufacturer's lubrication guidelines.
Industrial machines work under harsh conditions, and parts inevitably wear out. Bearings, gears, belts, seals, shafts, and other components can become less effective over time.
Failing to address visible wear may cause component failure and damage adjacent parts. Routine checks enable maintenance personnel to replace worn parts before they cause a bigger failure.
All machines have operating restrictions. Operating equipment beyond its intended use can cause excessive stress on motors, bearings, gears, hydraulic systems, and structural components.
Overloading will lead to overheating, deformation, early wear, and failure. Operators must always operate within the machine's operating specifications.
Overheating can damage electrical, mechanical, and hydraulic parts. A lack of lubrication, blocked ventilation, overloading, cooling system issues, or extended use can cause overheating. Temperature monitoring can give an early warning of a machine operating outside normal limits. Interestingly, our repair technicians can help you in this regard.
Shafts, couplings, gears, and other parts should be properly aligned. Misalignment can cause excessive vibration and loads, leading to increased wear on bearings and other components. Frequent alignment checks can minimize unnecessary stress and prolong equipment life.
Dust and dirt, moisture, chemicals, and other contaminants can enter machinery and cause damage to sensitive components. Lubrication systems, bearings, hydraulic equipment, and electrical components are especially susceptible to contamination.
Maintain clean machines and their environment, and change filters as needed to minimize contamination-related failures.
Motors and automatic equipment may malfunction or fail if there are electrical problems. Typical problems are broken wires, loose connections, power surges, overloaded circuits, and faulty electrical parts. Regular electrical checks can help detect issues before they become equipment problems.
Well-maintained equipment can still fail if not used properly. Machinery can be subjected to unnecessary stress due to incorrect settings, improper start-up/shut-down, overloading, and not following operating instructions. Therefore, proper operator training is an important aspect of equipment reliability.
Problems can arise later if the installation is not done correctly, parts are not replaced correctly, or repairs are not done correctly. Parts can become misaligned, connections may be poor, or the wrong replacement parts may be used.
Complex repairs and installations should be performed by qualified technicians to ensure that the equipment is restored properly.
Failure of industrial machinery is preventable. Equipment reliability can be greatly improved through regular maintenance, proper lubrication, replacement of worn-out parts at appropriate times, operator training, cleanliness, and routine inspections. Rather than replacing the damaged part, businesses should look into the cause of the machine's failure. Finally, see what HARtech can do for your plant.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |