Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
AI Innovation | Nov 26, 2025

Image: Freepik/DC Studio
On November 24 2025, the United States introduced the Genesis Mission by presidential executive order to create a national plan to use AI to accelerate scientific discovery by turning federal scientific data and national lab supercomputers into one research engine. The Mission instructs the Department of Energy to bring together national lab compute systems, decades of federal datasets, and advanced AI tools into a unified discovery platform.
The United States invests about $940B each year in total R&D across business, academic, and government sectors. Federal agencies perform roughly $74B of that work according to National Science Board data showing total U.S. R&D and federal R&D performance. The Genesis Mission uses this large research base to speed up discovery and strengthen national competitiveness.
Federal leaders say scientific progress has slowed. Research in biotechnology, materials science, clean energy, and other fields takes too much time and requires significant resources. The Genesis Mission will use artificial intelligence to help researchers simulate experiments, test ideas, and find scientific patterns faster.
Federal scientific datasets include information from the Department of Energy open data portal, National Institutes of Health scientific data resources, NASA Earth science and satellite data, NOAA climate and environmental datasets, Environmental Protection Agency public data, and the United States Geological Survey geological data platform. These datasets include physics records, biological data, climate observations, satellite readings, environmental measurements, and outputs from high performance computing systems.
Artificial intelligence can examine large datasets, run simulations, detect scientific relationships, and support experiment design. The White House states that the Mission will “harness Federal scientific datasets, the worlds largest collection of such datasets, developed over decades of Federal investments” to accelerate discovery through new scientific models.
The Mission targets strategic fields such as semiconductors, quantum science, fusion energy, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and critical materials. Federal leaders link this work directly to national security and economic strength.
Federal documents describe the Genesis Mission as a national platform that brings government, industry, and academic researchers into one discovery system. The Department of Energy states that the Mission “will mobilize the Department of Energy’s 17 National Laboratories, industry, and academia” to build an AI enabled discovery platform that uses national lab supercomputers and curated federal datasets as described in the Department of Energy announcement of the Genesis Mission.
The executive order also defines the American Science and Security Platform as infrastructure that includes high performance computing, advanced AI models, secure access to federal and synthetic datasets, and tools for AI assisted experimentation. These documents show that the United States intends to create structured pathways for companies and researchers who need access to national compute systems and curated scientific data.
The United States holds a large base of scientific data created through national laboratory work and federal research. These datasets often sit in separate systems. The Genesis Mission brings this information together and connects it to artificial intelligence tools. This gives the United States a clear advantage in fields that rely on data and high performance computing.
Artificial intelligence can help researchers test ideas faster, explore scientific patterns, and move from manual processes to rapid model driven cycles. If the United States reduces discovery times across key scientific fields it can improve innovation strength and create more commercial opportunities.
Canada invests far less in R&D than the United States. The comparison below uses verified public data from the National Science Board, Statistics Canada, the OECD, and Canadian research analysis.
| Measure | United States | Canada | Sources |
| Total R&D spending | $940B in U.S. R&D spending | $55B in Canadian R&D spending 2024 | NSB, Statistics Canada |
| Federal R&D spending | $74B in U.S. federal R&D performance | smaller share inside the total figure | NSB, Statistics Canada |
| R&D intensity | above 3% in many measures | among lowest in G7 according to Canadian reporting on weak R&D intensity | University Affairs, OECD |
| Business R&D | strong private sector | weak according to research on structural gaps in Canadian business R&D | Checkpoint Research |
| Labour productivity | higher output per hour | persistent gap according to OECD reporting on Canada’s productivity | OECD |
This comparison shows the structural difference between the two countries. The United States enters the Genesis Mission with a large research base that artificial intelligence can accelerate. Canada enters with weaker investment and slower productivity growth.
Canada invests less in R&D than the United States and shows lower business led research compared with peer countries. A recent Canadian assessment ranks Canada near the bottom of advanced economies in business enterprise R&D intensity according to research that highlights Canada’s weak private sector R&D investment. Canada also has world class AI research centers such as Vector, Mila, and Amii, and they contribute strong scientific output. However they don't operate a national system that brings together federal datasets, high performance computing, and artificial intelligence for coordinated discovery.
These gaps limit Canada’s ability to compete against countries that build stronger national research infrastructure. If the United States speeds up discovery through a national artificial intelligence platform Canada may rely more on foreign systems and lose ground in advanced materials, biotech, quantum research, and energy.
The Genesis Mission gives the United States a new way to use scientific data, computation, and artificial intelligence to speed up discovery. It supports national security, innovation, and economic strength. For Canada it raises a serious challenge. Canada invests far less in R&D and lacks a unified artificial intelligence research platform. As the United States accelerates discovery Canada must decide how to strengthen the outcomes of its research base and protect its competitiveness in a world where artificial intelligence supports scientific progress.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
AI Productivity | Nov 25, 2025

A founder at a Canadian fintech reviewed a routine workflow and noticed something important. The company had recently replaced several older tools with newer AI powered systems, and remarkably the new configuration could complete multi step tasks that used to require manual effort. The system gathered information, applied rules and moved the case forward without constant human prompts. Nothing unexpected happened. The work simply flowed from step to step. In that moment the team recognized that they were no longer working with simple tools. They had introduced capabilities that belonged in the agent category, even if no one had used that word yet.
The realization opened a larger conversation inside the company. That is the new AI systems didn't behave like single purpose tools like before. They behave more like assistants that can move through a workflow once they understand the goal. The team had not changed the work. The technology had changed what the work could look like, and recent research confirmed this realty of how teams are coordinating autonomous systems across full processes.
A tool performs a single action only when prompted. It behaves like a calculator or a search bar. Tasks such as summarizing documents, extracting fields, drafting support replies or classifying transactions remain inside this zone. A person decides each step. The system never chooses what to do next.
An agent behaves differently. It acts. It moves through a journey, maintains context, decides the next step and continues until it reaches a point where it needs help or completes the goal. Take a look at these AI use cases by haptik, such as CASHe credit flow where a conversational system guides a borrower from authentication to instant approval, or how Zuri improves efficiency and customer experience at Global insurance leader Zurich without human involvement. Both examples highlight AI agent behaviour, and not tools.
The practical 'acid test' for fintech teams is simple. Ask who chooses the next step in the workflow. If the human chooses, it remains a tool. If the system decides, it behaves as an agent. This distinction matters because agents require supervision, governance and ownership. They influence outcomes and customer experience. Treating an agent as a tool leads to blind spots.
Evidence from global surveys explains why this distinction matters for performance. The findings on workplace AI usage show that 88% of employees use AI at work but only 5% use it in ways that change their roles. Organizations also lose more than 40% of potential productivity gains (opportunity cost) when talent, workflows and governance do not align with the technology.
When fintech leaders understand the moment when tools become agents, they gain the vision needed to build high performing hybrid teams.
Once a fintech organization recognizes that its systems behave like agents, the nature of work begins to change. People no longer complete tasks in isolation. They supervise agents that perform sequences. The work becomes a blend of human judgement and systems execution. See this research on end-to-end agentic workflows, which analyzes how a few people can guide a large number of agents across full processes. These supervisors focus on results rather than steps. They correct behaviour, interpret outputs and refine the system. The work becomes less about completing tasks and more about guiding outcomes.
Check out this practical example describing an agentic fraud systems showing how agents monitor transactions, test controls and highlight anomalies. Human analysts review these exceptions, approve responses and explain logic to regulators. The agent carries out the first layer of work. Humans perform higher judgement. This structure changes daily routines.
A hybrid team begins the day by reviewing the agent log. They scan escalations, exceptions, unexpected patterns and customer interactions. The team also discusses where the agent needs correction, where it performed well and where rules need refinement. This daily rhythm feels closer to coaching a junior colleague than running a piece of software.
Changing structural workflows and shifting from doing to supervising can have cultural effects. Some feel replaced while others feel empowered. Leadership determines the direction.
When leaders explain that supervising agents is a higher judgement role, employees view it as progression. When leaders fail to explain, they view it as displacement.
Managing hybrid teams requires clarity, structure and shared visibility. A hybrid team succeeds when the agent behaves predictably, the humans supervise confidently and both sides contribute to results.
When no one owns the behaviour of an agent, the system drifts. Fintech leaders need to assign a small group of people to own a journey end to end. Strong supervision with the authority to adjust prompts, thresholds and workflow logic.
Every action taken by an agent must appear in a shared log. Without this, the team can't diagnose issues or maintain trust. The shared log becomes the anchor of the hybrid team.
When a human intervenes, the reason appears in the same log. When an agent acts, the outcome appears there as well. This shared view prevents confusion.
Teams must review the agent’s behaviour frequently. The review cycles in studies of agentic processes show that continuous improvement drives results. In practice, teams meet weekly to adjust rules, refine decision boundaries and align the agent with policy. These refinements keep the system current and adaptive.
Agents cannot handle every scenario. Hybrid teams need clear rules for human intervention. They must know when to stop the agent and how to redirect it. Regulatory environments require this clarity. Fintech companies that operate in regulated sectors must explain why the agent acted and when a human stepped in.
Leaders need to measure the hybrid team as one unit. The work of the humans and the work of the agent form one system. Outcomes such as customer satisfaction, approval speed, fraud reduction and error rates reflect joint performance. When both sides improve together, results accelerate.
Hybrid teams succeed when leaders treat the agent as a teammate with responsibilities and supervision rather than as a simple tool or gadget.
Canadian fintech companies operate inside a competitive global environment. Research from major international surveys positions AI as critical infrastructure for financial systems. Productivity gains increasingly come from the interaction between humans and agents rather than from models alone.
Tools help people work. Agents help the company run. Those that treat AI only as a set of single purpose tools are at risk of falling behind. Fintech leaders who understand this difference, and who build hybrid teams around it, will gain an advantage in scale, efficiency, and risk management. They also build trust with regulators and partners. A company that can explain how its agents behave, why they behave that way and how humans supervise them will become a more reliable and stronger participant.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Regulation | Nov 21, 2025

Image: Freepik/jannoon028
On November 19, 2025, the Ontario Securities Commission announced the launch of its Research Grant Competition. This is a pilot initiative that provides up to five (5) grants of $30,000 each to support research on the competitiveness of Ontario capital markets.
The purpose of the competition is to invite proposals from researchers to examine how Ontario capital markets can stay efficient, innovative, and globally competitive as outlined in the Competition Details.
The program is open only to researchers who work at or are enrolled in a Canadian academic institution and who have not been employees or directors of the OSC during the past five years. Applicants must also confirm that they aren't involved in any unresolved regulatory or criminal findings. The OSC will award up to five grants of thirty thousand dollars with submissions due February 27 2026, winners notified April 17 2026, and final papers due August 14 2026.
Grant Vingoe, CEO of the OSC:
“The OSC Research Grant Competition is seeking to tap into Canada’s brightest minds to undertake the challenge of delving into the competitiveness of Ontario’s capital markets. In light of the current global geopolitical and economic challenges, it is increasingly important that we look at ways to help Ontario’s capital markets remain competitive, and we welcome the fresh thinking that the competition will bring, as we look ahead and plan future initiatives.”
The OSC will review proposals based on alignment with its mandate, originality, feasibility, academic support, and public benefit. Successful researchers will have their papers published on the OSC website and may present findings directly to senior leadership.
The competition currently limits eligibility to academic researchers. Wider participation from industry experts, innovators, and market practitioners could provide applied evidence on real operational friction such as registration, compliance, cost, access to capital, and technology adoption.
Numerous experienced practitioners who work on the front line encounter daily competitive pressures and could offer insights that complement academic analysis but unfortunately grant funding appears tied to researchers in academia.
Ensuring Ontario's capital markets remain competitive plays a key role in Canada's economic strength. While the research supported by this OSC initiative could influence future policy decisions related to capital formation, market structure, and investor confidence, if the goal is truly to benefit Ontario's capita markets one wonders why participation is restricted to researchers. The bottom line is that whatever insights are produced, if the OSC is to implement any of the ideas into practice it must be done swiftly, especially insights that help identify (quantify) structural barriers that affect the ability of Canadian firms to grow and compete globally.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Bank of Canada | Speech | Nov 20, 2025

Image: OECD via Haver Analytics and Bank of Canada 2023
On November 19 2025, the Bank of Canada (BoC) released a speech, 'Toward a virtuous circle for productivity' delivered by Nicolas Vincent the external Deputy Governor at a recent event of the Association des économistes québécois (ASDEQ) together with CFA Québec.
His talk explains the pattern of Canada's long standing productivity challenges and sets out what needs to change. Canada has lived with the same productivity problem for a generation. Growth has slowed, investment has weakened, and the country has become more exposed to global shocks.
Weak productivity discourages investment, and weak investment keeps productivity low.
Regulatory and competitive conditions are central to improving that pattern.
Training, mobility, and credential recognition must work better to support new technology.
- Status quo isn't acceptable as keeping the current environment in place would lock in today’s slow growth.
Vincent captures the situation clear:
“To put it bluntly, we’re stuck in a vicious circle.”
He notes that productivity grew about 3% in the 1960s and 1970s but fell to roughly 1% between 2000 and 2019. When productivity is weak, wage gains soften and demand becomes fragile. Then companies hesitate to invest in new tools or equipment, and that hesitation feeds right back into weaker productivity.
He highlights 3 things that need to change the trajectory (not a quick fix)
The investment climate is paramount for firms trying to modernize. One of the clearest lines in his speech addresses the barrier businesses often describe:
“Businesses often tell us that Canada’s regulatory framework is too cumbersome, complex and far-reaching.”
A stronger investment climate means faster decisions, clearer expectations, and fewer overlapping rules. That allows companies to move ahead with projects that raise productivity instead of delaying them.
In fintech, it's especially important because licensing decisions, compliance approvals, and inter-provincial regulatory alignment determine how quickly a firm can launch or scale. When these pathways work well, investment grows and innovation accelerates.
The opposite has been visible for a decade (at least). Companies often face unpredictable pathways, uneven timelines, and unclear requirements (think the original equity crowdfunding rules, open banking, payment modernization etc). Those conditions slow product launches, and discourage upgrades. They also weaken the broader economy by delaying the investment (both internal and external) needed to lift productivity.
Vincent says competition pushes companies to improve and become more resilient:
“Canadian businesses that are highly exposed to international competition evolve and improve. This makes them more productive, competitive and resilient.”
Competitive markets encourage businesses to adopt better technology, strengthen processes, and serve customers more effectively. This raises productivity across entire sectors.
When competitive pressure is limited, firms face fewer reasons to upgrade or innovate quickly. That is the opposite of what a modern economy needs. Slower adoption means slower productivity gains, and slower gains leave the economy more exposed to global changes.
Leaving competition conditions unchanged would keep the loop intact and make it more difficult for Canada to close its gap with peer countries.
Vincent points out that productivity depends on people as much as on technology:
“Investing in our talent … means making it easier to recognize professional accreditations across provinces and territories, and the foreign credentials of people who move to Canada.”
Training systems that adapt quickly, credential pathways that work smoothly, and mobility across provinces all help firms adopt new technology with confidence.
Today’s reality is different. Workers often wait months or years to have skills recognized, training programs lag behind new tools, and mobility rules slow the movement of talent. These conditions limit how quickly firms can scale, modernize, or respond to new opportunities.
Keeping this in place would weaken the very foundation needed for stronger productivity.
Vincent’s message is measured but urgent. Canada's productivity problem is caused by multiple things, and no single fix. But the government policies that impact investment, competition, and talent development must work better than they do today. These are public frameworks that governments influence, and businesses must act on them once conditions improve.
The payoff is substantial and what all Canadians should be aiming for. Higher productivity strengthens incomes, supports wage growth without inflation pressure, expands competitiveness, and improves resilience in a world where shocks are becoming more common.
The status quo of slow investment, limited competition, and restricted talent must be changed to improve the the country’s economic strength and provide opportunities for Canadians to build a stronger future.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Bank of Canada Research | Nov 14, 2025

Image: Perceived interconnections between banks and NBFIs (Bank of Canada Staff Report, November 2025)
On November 13 2025, the Bank of Canada Staff published Analytical Note 2025-26 titled, "Perceived interconnections between Canadian banks and non-bank financial intermediaries under stress" (16 page PDF), that examines how stress spreads between banks and non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs) such as investment and mortgage funds. While the research found that market-based linkages between banks and non-banks have grown much stronger over the past decade, it offers no specific policy steps.
For Canada’s fintech and regulatory communities, that leaves room to build smarter transparency and data-driven tools that improve resilience while encouraging innovation.
The Bank used a market-based metric called the ratio of tail sensitivities to track how often banks and NBFIs experience stress at the same time. In simple terms, it measures how likely both sectors are to face sharp losses together when markets turn volatile.
Before the pandemic, that overlap was around 60%, meaning stress in one sector often stayed contained. During 2020 (Covid-19), the overlap jumped to almost 90%, showing that both banks and NBFIs were hit by the same shocks at once.
Post Covid-19, it has stayed above 70%. This signals that Canada’s financial system now behaves more like a single network where investor confidence, liquidity, and risk pricing can ripple quickly across different parts of the market.
The analysis relies on market indicators such as price changes and co-movement ratios. These signals show how banks and non-banks react to market stress, but they don't track the underlying funding flows, repo exposure, or off balance sheet commitments that reveal how those stresses move in practice. The Bank acknowledges that data gaps make it hard to see how financial stress truly spreads between institutions.
The research measures perceived connections through statistical patterns rather than verified, real time data linkages. That distinction matters. Without deeper, connected data, it is harder to see where vulnerabilities are forming or how quickly they could spread. Closing that gap doesn't necessarily require new regulation but better tools and shared information that improve resilience while encouraging innovation.
Regulators already monitor funding and liquidity in near real time, but the Bank of Canada notes that current data still do not explain how financial stress moves between different parts of the system. The missing piece is insight into how one market’s strain can quickly affect another’s ability to function.
For example, if liquidity tightens in the mortgage or bond market, investment funds might sell assets to meet investor redemptions. Those sales can push down prices, reducing the value of collateral that banks use for their own lending and funding. Within hours, what starts as a localized funding issue can spread to other sectors that rely on those same assets. Economists have long modelled this type of stress transmission, but those models depend on historical or aggregated data. They show how shocks can travel but not how fast they move in real time.
RegTech innovation could help close this gap. Shared data platforms, digital reporting tools, and secure analytics could give both regulators and market participants a clearer view of where risks are forming. Instead of expediting new rules, the opportunity is better information that allows for faster, better, data-driven action. Fintechs can play a leading role by designing systems that make oversight smarter, not heavier, while strengthening confidence across the financial system.
If Canada wants to maintain stability and support innovation, it needs visibility into where financial pressure builds. The Bank of Canada's findings show that perceived connections already move markets but without deeper real-time data access, those perceptions could harden into real stress events. The opportunity is to turn perception into understanding and make transparency Canada’s real advantage.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |