Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: Voices
UK Crowdfunding Caps Lift As EU Pushes €12M
Feb 10, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Alternative Finance and Capital Markets
UK POP Rules Lift Fundraising Caps For Crowdfunded Equity
On February 10 2026, UK POP rules go live, removing the old prospectus trigger that made large public raises expensive, slow, and out of reach for many private companies.
What Changes In The UK
For years, UK companies faced a hard line. If a business raised more than €8 million in securities from the public in a year, it had to produce a full prospectus (NB: the UK retained that euro-denominated threshold in its domestic framework post-brexit). Crowdcube says that prospectus costs could cost more than £250,000 and take months, which pushed many companies away from public community rounds even when demand existed.
See: UK Launches PISCES to Modernize Capital Markets
Under the Public Offer Platform regime, raises above £5 million now run through a regulated POP, and the regime removes the upper fundraising cap for those offers (No more funding caps). Raises under £5 million remain outside the POP requirement, but regulated execution and investor protection expectations still apply.
Platforms now carry more responsibility for diligence, disclosure quality, and investor safeguards. That shifts the burden from a giant issuer document to a supervised platform process that can move faster.
Global Caps Are Moving. Is A New Policy Window Opening Up?
The UK is not alone. In the United States, Crowdfund Capital Advisors submitted a $20M Reg CF petition asking the SEC to raise the Regulation Crowdfunding cap from $5M to $20M. In Europe, the European Digital Finance Association are pushing to increase the ECSP threshold from €5m to €12m.
After years of advocating, Canada finally harmonized nationally its startup-crowdfunding exemption in 2021, but regulators have kept the issuer cap conservative. Under National Instrument 45 110, eligible issuers can raise up to $1.5m in a 12 month period, which a growing company can quickly outgrow and end up soon looking for more funding via heavier paths for larger rounds. If the government wants to prioritize funding scape-ups, they should take another look at increasing equity crowdfunding caps in Canada to be in line with global peers.
See: CSA Proposes $50K Harmonized Self Certified Investor Exemption
This funding cap tension isn't new. In fact NCFA has been advocating for the OSC and CSA to raise issuer funding caps for years. In 2017 for example, NCFA petitioned to raise caps to modernize equity crowdfunding in Ontario. In 2019, $5m cap formed part of NCFA's recommendations to reduce regulatory burden and unlock growth capital. Again in 2020, during national harmonization discussions, NCFA advocated to modernize NI 45 110 including increasing caps to $5 million so the framework could match real funding needs in a digital economy.
Now with the UK FCA removing prospectus triggers and the US and EU push for higher caps, there may be a new policy window for Canada's equity crowdfunding participants to petition yet again. If other jurisdictions support $10m to $20m community rounds under platform oversight, Canada needs to decide whether it wants founders scaling here or structuring growth capital elsewhere.
A higher ceiling, including a path toward $5m and beyond, would better match growth stage reality while keeping platform level investor protection front and centre. The global direction of travel now strengthens the case for a renewed Canadian push grounded in data, experience, and competitiveness.
Talking Point
If regulated platforms can run larger public offers without a prospectus wall in the UK, what should Canada do next, raise the ceiling, create a platform lane for larger rounds, or keep the cap and accept that growth capital routes around Canada?
See: Public Market Challenges and Equity Crowdfunding Capital
One practical takeaway stands out. POP style rules treat the platform as the compliance spine, not the issuer. That design can cut cost and time while still demanding clear disclosures, suitability controls, and due diligence at the point of sale. While Canada doesn't necessarily need to copy the UK, it does need a credible path for larger community rounds that doesn't force founders into a prospectus sized bill before they have the scale to absorb it.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
MrBeast Buys Step And Targets Youth Banking
Youth Banking Acquisition | February 13, 2027
Image: Freepik AI
Youth Accounts Meet Creator Scale and A New Growth Playbook
On February 9, 2026, MrBeast and Beast Industries announced the acquisition of Step, who currently serves 7 million users and has high profile listed investors including the likes of Stephen Curry, Charli D’Amelio, Justin Timberlake, Will Smith, and The Chainsmokers.
Step published traction well before the acquisition showing continued growth. On April 27, 2021, Step reached 1.5 million users in less than six months (88% of users joined Step to open their first bank account) and closed $100 million Series C funding. These stats mean youth banking behaves differently from most consumer fintech categories. A teen rarely tries five money apps. Instead they pick one first account and builds habits inside it. That first account moment becomes a habitual wedge.
See: Fintech Fridays EP42: Insights into the Teen Banking Sector and Improving the Financial Well-being of Families
Jeff Housenbold, CEO of Beast Industries:
"Financial health is fundamental to overall wellbeing, yet too many people lack access to the tools and knowledge they need to build financial security. This acquisition positions us to meet our audiences where they are, with practical, technology-driven solutions that can transform their financial futures for the better."
Why MrBeast Acquired Step
The purchase connects Step’s youth base with a distribution engine built on repeat attention. With MrBeast having 467 million YouTube subscribers and Step aimed at Gen Z and Gen Alpha users, the logic is simple. A creator brand can teach the same money basics repeatedly, then place the product in front of the same audience without paying for every reminder. Step fits because it already proved teens will open accounts and stick with them long enough to build habit.
MrBeast spoke about financial foundation on x.com:
“Nobody taught me about investing, building credit, or managing money when I was growing up. I want to give millions of young people the financial foundation I never had. I'm so excited to share that we are acquiring the financial services app, @step.
Youth Banking Starts Earlier Than Most Teams Assume
Parents open accounts earlier than many youth product roadmaps assume. The Financial Brand summarized research that said 63% parents opened checking or savings accounts for their children, including 35% before age 6 and 46% ages 6 to 12.
Parents also prefer no fees and no minimums, which is the trust layer in a product built for kids.
A separate parent survey tied account switching risks with youth accounts, reporting a 75.1% switch likelihood when a provider does not offer a family digital wallet.
Digital Habits Push Youth To New Money Tools
Student behaviour shows how quickly young segments move away from cash and toward embedded credit products. Save the Student said its 2025 student banking survey collected 701 students and found 27% BNPL use at least some of the time. The same survey said 54% cash use once a month or less.
Investing interest is also moving earlier among teens according to a MarketWatch report who describes an affordability backdrop keeps pushing younger people to look for new paths to financial comfort.
The Ad Creator Economy Makes Owned Attention Valuable
Consumer fintech growth often begins with paid acquisition, so the ad market sets the operating floor. WPP Media forecast $1.08T in global advertising revenue in 2025. In a market that large, repeat reach matters because it lowers how often a brand must pay just to get one more chance to explain the product.
See: AI Immerses Youth Today And The Real Question Of Protection
This is the part many fintech teams underestimate. Youth banking needs repetition. Teens and parents need to hear the same rules and see the same controls until trust forms. MrBeast already owns repetition through content. Step already owns the account relationship.
Why It Matters
Youth banking wins first account trust and compounds when habits stick. It also punishes fee friction. Canada already has youth focused products that are proving demand. Mydoh positions itself for ages 6 to 17 with a family money app and card. Neo Financial markets a youth offer with no fees and no minimums for teenagers. There's also Spendsafe who recently launched a youth platform for ages 6 and up, backed by Mastercard, with a prepaid card and app controls.
Deal terms stay undisclosed in public coverage, so the outcome will show up in trackable operating numbers on retention, repeat usage, credit building adoption, complaint volume and switching. Building for younger users and their parents? Read more about Gen Z expectations and Gen Z finance at NCFA.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Atkins Testimony Targets IPO Burden And Crypto Rules
Feb 12, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Capital Markets and Digital Assets
Image: Freepik/jcstudio
IPO Burden And Market Structure Costs
On February 11, 2026, Paul Atkins, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, delivered committee testimony to the U.S. House Financial Services Committee.
The testimony puts numbers behind a push to cut the cost of being public. It cites $2.7 billion in annual costs to file annual reports and links that burden to a decline in listed companies. It notes more than 7,800 listed companies shortly after Atkins left the SEC in the mid 1990s, then a roughly 40% drop by the time he returned as Chairman. A footnote lists 4,761 exchange listed companies as of September 30, 2025.
Atkins testimony backs the CLARITY Act and testified that the SEC and CFTC intend to now use joint Project Crypto as a bridge while Congress works through legislation, including considering token taxonomy and exemptions for on chain transactions.
Market Oversight Cost Review
The testimony also targets the cost floor of U.S. market oversight. It orders a comprehensive review of the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT), a market surveillance system created under Rule 613 that helps regulators track activity across U.S. markets. The review covers governance, funding, scope, security, and retiring duplicative systems.
His testimony put figures on the record. It cited a 2016 estimate of up to about $55 million a year. It also stated the SEC reduced the originally approved 2025 CAT budget, which included about $249 million in annual operating costs, by about $92 million over the course of the year. He also mentioned that amendments to self-regulatory organizations could save an estimate of about $7 million to $9 million annually.
See: Tokenized Infrastructure Is Changing How Markets Operate
The SEC looks interested in lowering the cost of becoming and staying public, while it reworks how surveillance cost and scope get set in U.S. markets. Fintechs with IPO plans should expect more scrutiny around what truly counts as material disclosure and what becomes removable. Trading, brokerage, and market data firms should expect CAT related requirements and cost allocation to remain under pressure while the review runs.
Implications for Firms
For Canadian fintechs, this testimony is important for three practical reasons. (1) Many Canadian scaleups raise capital, list, or trade in U.S. markets, so any push to narrow disclosure to material items can change IPO planning and ongoing reporting work. (2) Firms that run U.S. broker dealer, ATS, or market data relationships can expect changing surveillance cost and scope expectations as the Consolidated Audit Trail review progresses. (3) Canadian crypto and tokenized finance firms that serve U.S. customers or counterparties should expect token classification and control evidence to become a harder gate if Project Crypto produces a taxonomy and on chain exemptions.
Talking Point
If token taxonomy becomes the bridge before Congress finishes crypto legislation, what becomes the first trust test for builders, asset classification discipline, market integrity controls, or operational readiness under stress?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Canada AI Strategy Confronts Capital Flight
AI Policy Consultation | February 11, 2026
11,300 Respondents Demand Sovereign Capital, Procurement Reform and Domestic IP retention
On February 5, 2026, Innovation Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) released the official Engagements on Canada’s Next AI Strategy Summary of Inputs. The report summarizes a 30 day consultation that ran from October 1 to 31, 2025 and confirms that 11,300 participants submitted 64,600 responses across 26 policy questions about Canada’s next AI strategy.
The consultation addressed the full AI policy landscape, including research and talent, adoption across industry and government, education and skills, infrastructure resilience, national security, environmental sustainability, Indigenous data sovereignty and inclusion. The process ran under The Honourable Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, supported by a National AI Strategy Task Force composed of startup operators, investors, researchers and civil society leaders.
This article focuses on what matters most for fintech founders and investors, where the strongest inputs from the consultation relate to capital formation, procurement design, intellectual property retention and domestic scaling incentives.
Who Responded
The consultation drew wide participation. 83% submitted as individuals. 17% responded on behalf of organizations, and reflected national engagement across technology, finance, academia, professional services and public institutions.
See: $7.5 Billion Microsoft AI Buildout In Canada
52% identified as interested Canadians. 19% came from business. 13% represented academia or research. The rest included government, associations and other sectors.
Ontario accounted for 39% of responses. British Columbia 20.6%. Alberta 7.8%. Québec 7.6%.
Capital Structure Is Under Review
Across submissions, one theme stood out. Canada produces AI research. It struggles to anchor AI companies at scale.
Respondents called for sovereign capital vehicles, modernization of SR&ED and IRAP, and stronger intellectual property retention frameworks. Intellectual property retention refers to keeping ownership of core technology, patents and data assets inside Canada rather than transferring them through early acquisition or foreign incorporation. Stakeholders expressed a preference for patient domestic capital tied to retention conditions, not simply additional grants. That implies potential co-investment models, domestic head office commitments and scaling tools designed to prevent early exits or foreign acquisition.
Canada ranks among global leaders in AI research output. Yet growth stage capital is still significantly thinner than in the United States. In 2025, Canadian VC firms raised just over $2.1B, with fundraising concentrating as the five largest Canadian venture funds captured 83% of all capital raised while emerging managers raised $249M. That level of concentration narrows the number of scaled domestic capital sources available to support long runway AI and fintech growth.
When companies reach scale, many incorporate abroad or raise major rounds outside Canadian markets. Capital migration reduces ownership, long term tax capacity and domestic control over strategic assets. This consultation reflects recognition that Canada’s scaling architecture requires structural reform.
For fintech founders following new AI minister prioritizes growth over rules, this reinforces the need for commercialization outcomes and ownership durability rather than additional regulatory layering.
Procurement And Market Design
Respondents pushed for standardized procurement playbooks and real pathways from pilot to deployment. Suggestions were for coordinated procurement models that create anchor customers at scale.
See: Market Forces Pressuring Fintech Plans For 2026
Predictable domestic revenue reduces investor risk perception and strengthens valuations. It also strengthens Canadian firms’ credibility when competing internationally. Procurement design therefore influences capital formation and competitive positioning.
This matters most in regulated sectors. When government adoption aligns with frameworks such as the CIRO digital asset custody framework, compliance becomes a strategic advantage rather than a cost centre. Procurement validation can reinforce regulatory credibility and accelerate scaling.
Compute, Sovereignty And Competitive Barriers
Participants identified gaps in domestic compute capacity and reliance on foreign cloud providers. Calls for Canadian controlled infrastructure go beyond just hardware investment. They imply potential changes to data residency expectations, cloud dependency exposure and compliance thresholds.
Sovereign compute investment could open infrastructure financing opportunities while raising entry costs for firms dependent on foreign controlled platforms. Infrastructure choices influence market structure.
Governance And Scaling Dynamics
Submissions supported proportionate, risk tiered regulatory frameworks, independent audits and clearer liability standards. Respondents generally favoured governance models where obligations scale with actual risk exposure rather than one size fits all rules.
Regulatory preference was for clarity, predictability and alignment between risk level and compliance burden. High impact AI applications would face stronger safeguards, while lower risk use cases would not carry unnecessary constraints.
See: Budget 2025 Accelerates Fintech, AI, and Capital Growth
If thresholds are calibrated carefully and compliance pathways are clear, early stage firms gain certainty and investors price regulatory exposure more confidently. If risk categories are broad or implementation complex, governance costs rise and time to market slows.
The strategic issue is how regulatory architecture affects scaling speed, capital formation and Canada’s cost competitiveness relative to larger markets. Governance design influences who scales, who consolidates and who exits.
What To Watch Next
The consultation closed on October 31, 2025. The Engagement on Canada's Next AI Strategy summary report states that the inputs will inform drafting of Canada’s 2026 AI strategy, which the federal government plans to release later this year.
The report doesn't however specify any fiscal commitments or program design details. Those decisions will appear, if at all, in the final strategy document and subsequent budget measures.
From a market perspective, founders and investors should watch for concrete triggers for a sovereign capital vehicle with defined funding, commercialization linked SR&ED reform, procurement commitments beyond pilot programs, budget allocations for domestic compute infrastructure, and enforceable intellectual property safeguards.
If those elements appear with timelines and capital attached, they strengthen Canada's domestic scaling environment. If not, capital migration and entrepreneur drain will likely persist. The final strategy with design and implementation choices will be known this year.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Canada At A Productivity Crossroads, Bank Of Canada Warns
Economy | February 6, 2026
Productivity Now Limits Growth, Wages, and Scale Across Canada’s Economy
On February 5, 2026, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem delivered a speech at the Empire Club of Canada called 'Structural Change - Canada at Crossroads' warning that Canada has reached a productivity crossroads, where long standing structural limits now cap growth, wages, and competitiveness. Inflation no longer defines the constraint. Productivity does. For founders, investors, and policymakers, the question is no longer whether innovation exists in Canada, but whether the economic system allows it to scale. Of course, many stakeholders have been eluding to this data-driven fact for a decade, including NCFA.
At The Center Of Canada’s Growth Problem
“Canada’s productivity performance has been weak for a long time, and that limits how fast our economy can grow.”
Macklem identifies productivity as the binding constraint on Canada’s economic outlook. The data is clear. According to OECD GDP per hour worked data, Canada’s labour productivity remains well below the United States and has fallen further behind over the past decade. In 2023, Canada produced roughly 72% of US output per hour worked, a gap that continues to widen.
The Bank of Canada links this shortfall to weak business investment, slow technology adoption, and limited competitive pressure. These factors suppress output growth even as employment rises. As a result, wage growth, firm profitability, and national competitiveness all face structural limits.
NCFA analysis shows that productivity challenges increasingly reflect underinvestment in digital infrastructure, automation, and scalable financial systems rather than a shortage of talent or ideas. For example, see: Breaking Canada’s Productivity Trap For Stronger Growth or Fintech’s Role In Canada’s Productivity Revival or Canada's Productivity Depends on Intangible Tech Adoption, which detail how capital misallocation and limited competition slow modernization across sectors.
For fintech founders, productivity gaps point to unmet demand for tools that reduce friction in payments, lending, compliance, and data driven decision making. Where legacy systems persist, productivity losses accumulate across the economy.
Competition Drives Productivity And Canada Still Falls Short
“More competition pushes firms to innovate, invest, and become more productive.”
Macklem ties productivity directly to competitive intensity. Where markets concentrate, firms face less pressure to adopt new technology or improve efficiency. Canada’s financial services sector illustrates this clearly. In fact, the Bank of Canada's Senior Deputy Governor, Carolyn Rogers, called Canada's banking system an Oligopoly. Concentration in lending, payments, and capital markets slows adoption of new models that could lower costs for businesses.
NCFA tracks this dynamic, here are just a couple of examples: How Competition Powers Canada’s Economic Growth and Why SME Loan Competition In Canada Is Under Review.
Small and medium sized businesses feel the impact most. Limited lender choice raises borrowing costs and lengthens approval timelines. For fintech lenders and embedded finance platforms, this reinforces demand for modern credit models that expand access while maintaining risk discipline.
Capital Allocation Limits Scale And Slows Innovation
“Investment needs to flow to the firms that can grow and raise productivity.”
Canada’s venture capital structure continues to constrain scale. According to RBCx data, Canadian VC Fundraising Contracts And Concentrates, raising just over $2 billion in 2025. Capital concentrates heavily. The top five funds account for roughly 83% of total capital raised, while emerging managers raise approximately $249 million.
At the same time, total venture investment reached about $4.9 billion across 386 deals through the first nine months of 2025, compared with roughly $8.6 billion across all of 2024. These figures describe two forces in the same system. Fundraising concentrates while deployment becomes more selective.
For founders, capital access becomes a strategic constraint rather than a timing issue. For investors, it narrows the pool of companies able to scale inside Canada.
Regulation Shapes Productivity Outcomes
“Good policy supports competition, investment, and long term growth.”
Macklem acknowledges that productivity doesn't improve in a vacuum. Firms respond to the regulatory environment they operate in. When compliance costs rise faster than firms' capacity, or when rules favour incumbents over new entrants, productivity suffers.
NCFA has consistently shown that regulatory design plays a decisive role in whether innovation scales. When rules increase cost or delay without improving outcomes, firms delay investment and avoid experimentation. Productivity improves when regulation supports entry, proportional compliance, and faster market testing, as outlined in Innovative Approaches to Smarter Regulation and Overcoming Barriers to Growth in Financial Regulation.
Smarter regulation does not weaken safeguards. It reduces duplication, improves clarity, and aligns oversight with actual risk. Jurisdictions that achieve this balance create space for competition and faster technology adoption, lessons explored in Lessons for Canada from Global Leaders in Regulation.
Payments Infrastructure Is A Productivity Lever
“Efficient financial systems help capital move to its most productive uses.”
Macklem’s remarks extend naturally to payments infrastructure. Canada payments system processes enormous transaction volumes, reaching $12.2 trillion in 2024, yet modernization remains uneven.
Slow settlement and high transaction costs lengthen working capital cycles and increase operational risk, especially for SMEs. The productivity impact of faster payments and modern rails can't be understated as many countries rush to modernize their payment ecosystem and functionality, including Canada who has been working to update it's payment system for years and only now making progress being under the gun.
For fintech builders, payments remain one of the most direct ways to improve productivity across the economy.
Founders Face Structural Tradeoffs, Not Preference Gaps
“Productivity growth depends on the environment firms operate in.”
Macklem’s framing helps explain why successful Canadian built companies increasingly scale elsewhere. Why A $35M Built In Canada Startup Still Moved To The US, shows how growth stage constraints shape founder decisions even after proving traction at home. When capital pools, market size, and regulatory pathways align more clearly abroad, relocation of entrepreneurs and venture brain drain mirrors operating decisions, not national sentiment.
This trend reinforces the need to address productivity, competition, capital access, and regulation together rather than treating talent retention as a standalone issue. Founders are now at crossroads, and trying to make it work within system constraints.
When capital, regulation, and market access align, firms stay. When they do not, firms move.
What This Means For Fintech And Policy
Macklem’s speech aligns closely with the productivity, competition, and innovation themes NCFA has tracked and raised for years. Productivity improves when competition deepens, capital flows efficiently, regulation supports entry, and technology adoption accelerates. Fintech sits at the intersection of all four.
Policy tools that support SME expansion, such as export financing and market access programs, can reinforce financial innovation when aligned properly. Programs like CanExport SMEs show how capital support and operational scale can work together rather than in isolation. The challenge now is execution. Productivity gains come from systems that allow new firms to compete, scale, and deploy technology without unnecessary friction.
You may like these additional reads:
- Breaking Canada’s Productivity Trap For Stronger Growth
- Canada’s Public Sector Costs and Productivity Gap
- Why Upskilling Employs Leads to Greater Productivity and Engagement
- Reversing Canada’s Digital Economy Productivity Decline
- CMA Lessons on Competition and Growth for Canada
- Canada’s Competition Plan Is Getting More Serious
- Y Combinator Removes Canada From Standard Deal Terms
- CVCA And TCS Release The 50 Guide For 2026
- Payments Canada Admits Five New Payment Service Providers
- Good Money Trust Innovation And Canada’s Payments Future
- Global Payments to Reach $2.4 Trillion and Tokenized Future
- Canada Releases The First Draft Of The Stablecoin Act
- Canada Open Banking Commercialization Roadmap
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
AI Governance Gaps Exposed By Legal Leaders
Feb 4, 2026 | NCFA Expert Intelligence | AI Risk and Governance
Enterprise AI Adoption Outpaces Legal And Risk Frameworks
On February 3 2026, Dentons published a Voice from the Market North American Legal AI report following the firm’s inaugural Legal AI Summit. The report captures data insights from legal, business, and operations leaders across sectors about how organizations are handling real world AI deployment, specifically where AI adoption is creating legal and governance risk before regulators provide clear framework.
See: UK-Google Deal Raises DPI Red Flags for Canada
The findings matter for fintech founders and operators because legal teams are often the first to see where risk accumulates, such as in contracts, vendor relationships, employee use, and product liability, long before the market or regulators respond.
Key Findings
- 70% of respondents say AI already affects M&A diligence and business valuation
- 60% say contractual liability for AI errors remains unclear
- 35% reported concerns that third parties may train models on their data without explicit clarity or rights
- 57% expressed worry about employee monitoring and privacy issues tied to AI use
Most organizations in the survey reported they are designing their own AI governance frameworks because universal regulations do not exist yet. That gap puts legal risk in the critical path for AI use inside financial products and services.
“We want to cover the basics, but we don’t want to stymie innovation or scare people away with too many ‘do nots.’”
This comment above is from a survey participant highlighting the tension leaders face: Smart governance is needed, but overly prescriptive rules can impede experimentation and execution. So it's a real operational conflict that stakeholders must resolve long before policy catches up.
See: From Guardrails to Judgment in Claude’s 2026 Constitution
The governance gaps in the report align with real risks fintechs already encounter:
- AI models used in underwriting or risk scoring without clear liability assignment
- Vendor AI services trained on sensitive customer data without adequate contracts
- Unclear ownership of AI generated outputs or derivative intellectual property
- Lack of internal policies governing employee AI use on regulated data
Many fintechs are building AI capability faster than they are formalizing guardrails, which can expose firms to legal, operational, and compliance risk across functions where AI is integrated in workflows. Whether that's in credit decisions, document review, marketing, fraud monitoring, or customer support.
It also intersects with other areas NCFA has covered. For example, recent regulatory signals from the CSA–CIRO joint finfluencer guidance and the rise of stablecoin policy frameworks both show that Canada’s regulatory perimeter is tightening around behaviour and risk, not just product categories.
Talking Point
If legal risk surfaces first in AI contracts, vendor relationships, and internal use, where should fintechs build their earliest governance guardrails: in contracts, in internal policy, or in product design?
See: Canada’s Opportunity In Efficient Reasoning AI
Regulation typically always lags innovation. Legal and governance frameworks are being created inside enterprises today because no universal rulebook exists. Fintech innovators and operators who anticipate these gaps and embed guardrails early will be better positioned to scale responsibly and avoid costly legal exposure down the road.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada’s Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
AI, Capital, Money Rewire Financial Infrastructure In 2026
January 21, 2026 | Report Insights
Image: ARK Invest, Big Ideas 2026 report. AI inference cost data reproduced for commentary and analysis.
In 2026, Systems Run Continuously Instead of at Human Pace
In January 2026, ARK Invest released its annual research report Big Ideas 2026, building on trends first measured in Big Ideas 2025. The 111 page report spans artificial intelligence, tokenized assets, decentralized finance, Bitcoin, consumer AI platforms, and what ARK describes as the Great Acceleration. Rather than summarizing each theme in isolation, this article focuses on how these technologies accelerate change together inside financial systems.
What felt experimental in 2024 and operationally strained in 2025 now shows up as baseline reality in 2026. AI costs collapse, investment capital concentrates in infrastructure, digital assets move closer to settlement rails, and consumer AI platforms compress decision cycles. These forces do not arrive sequentially. They compound. The result is technically a financial system that no longer needs to pause between decisions.
See: Canada Confronts a Changing World at Davos 2026
ARK’s data on collapsing AI inference costs explains why this shift becomes unavoidable. At the same time, investment capital continues to concentrate in infrastructure designed for continuous operation. Together, these forces change how money moves, settles, and gets controlled.
Finance is AI-native by design. It already runs on software, explicit rules, and constant feedback. As AI becomes cheap enough to run continuously, software acts directly inside financial systems instead of waiting for human input.
AI Is Moving From Advice To Continuous Action
ARK’s Big Ideas 2026 research shows AI inference costs dropped more than 99% in the past year. That single data point explains why continuous operation becomes economically viable at scale for the first time.
When inference costs fall that far, AI stops being something teams consult occasionally. It becomes something that runs all the time. Human prompts, batch reviews, and periodic decision cycles turn into friction rather than safeguards.
See: NCFA Weekly Fintech Intelligence Jan 10-16, 2026
In financial systems, this breaks a long standing boundary. AI no longer stops at scoring, forecasting, or recommendations. It initiates actions. Payment routing adjusts automatically. Exposure limits rebalance in real time. Liquidity thresholds enforce themselves continuously. Software no longer waits for approval at every step.
Founders experience this when systems stay busy all the time instead of spiking occasionally. Investors see it when infrastructure costs stop falling as predictably even while revenue continues to grow. Operating leverage behaves differently because systems no longer rest between decisions.
Investment Capital Concentrates In The Rails
ARK’s capital analysis shows where investment capital flows as systems scale. In 2025, annual investment in data center systems reached roughly $500B, nearly 2.5 times the long term average from 2012 through 2023. Since the ChatGPT moment, ARK shows growth accelerating from about 5% to 29% annually. The report projects this category of investment could approach $1.4T by the end of the decade.
That level of spending signals where long term value accrues. Capital is not chasing surface automation features. It is concentrating where compute, data availability, uptime, and recovery determine whether systems can operate continuously without failure.
See: OpenAI Revenue Surpasses US $20B, Raising Fintech Stakes
For fintech teams, this breaks a familiar assumption. Products designed for occasional use face redesign pressure. Infrastructure built for constant operation gains structural leverage. Cost structure, resilience, and throughput now shape competitive advantage more than feature differentiation.
Payments Run Without Pausing
Traditional payment systems assume a person initiates the transaction. AI breaks that assumption. Software now initiates payments, manages balances, and settles obligations automatically as conditions change.
This pushes pressure into liquidity management, fraud controls, and settlement logic. Batch review fails quietly when systems never pause. ARK’s analysis of AI driven transaction flows emphasizes sustained throughput and recovery under stress rather than peak performance.
Founders building payment infrastructure encounter this pressure early. Systems designed for bursts now operate under constant load, and cost curves change accordingly. Reliability becomes a competitive feature rather than an operational afterthought.
Digital Wallets And Consumer AI Compress Control
ARK’s 2026 research frames consumer AI as an operating layer rather than a feature. AI models converge into a consumer operating system, and adoption accelerates faster than earlier digital platforms. As these systems take on purchasing, allocation, and coordination tasks, decision making shifts closer to software execution.
See: Stablecoin Interest and Rewards A Regulatory Fault Line
Wallets evolve alongside this change. They function less as interfaces and more as control layers for software driven financial activity. Identity, permissions, and payment logic compress into the same layer.
Investors familiar with earlier platform cycles recognize this pattern. Control consolidates where decisions execute, not where they are merely displayed.
Tokenized Assets And DeFi Become Plumbing
ARK frames tokenized assets as market infrastructure moving trillions of dollars in asset value onto blockchains. Tokenization matters because assets move and settle automatically. DeFi matters because financial rules run on software without manual steps.
ARK’s data shows digital asset application revenue reaches roughly $3.8B in 2025, with around one fifth generated in January alone. The report also notes that about 70 applications generate more than $1M each in monthly recurring revenue. Value capture shifts from base networks toward platforms that control execution, coordination, and user interaction.
For fintech builders, this exposes a structural mismatch. Systems designed for batch reconciliation struggle when assets move continuously.
Stablecoins And Digital Money Operate As Settlement Rails
ARK’s research treats stablecoins as payment and settlement rails, not alternative products. Transaction activity reaches record levels because stablecoins can now move value automatically and clear obligations without waiting for manual steps.
Bitcoin functions as a monetary network with predictable issuance and global settlement. In 2026, its relevance aligns with the same requirement driving stablecoin use. When systems run continuously, money must move at software speed.
See: FCA Stablecoin Sprint Puts Payment Models Under Review
This doesn't remove banks, payment firms, or regulators. It changes how settlement works underneath them, reflected in Canada’s Stablecoin Act draft, which outlines how programmable settlement rails are governed.
Regulation Follows System Design
ARK's analysis points to convergence. Continuous systems expose the limits of oversight built around delayed reporting and human initiated workflows. Design, auditability, and real time visibility matter more because systems no longer pause between decisions.
For policymakers, this changes where effective oversight begins. Rules written for periodic review struggle when financial activity runs continuously. Payments oversight, digital asset policy, and AI governance increasingly overlap because the systems themselves overlap.
Teams that design for transparency and control early reduce downstream risk. Regulators that focus on system behaviour rather than product labels gain clearer visibility and fewer surprises.
Outlook
Big Ideas 2026 highlights what happens when AI inference costs collapse by more than 99%, investment capital concentrates at unprecedented scale, digital assets mature into settlement rails, and consumer AI platforms compress decision cycles at the same time. Finance changes faster because it already runs on rules, incentives, and software.
See: Grok AI Sexual Image Failures Trigger Global Backlash
In 2026, the question is no longer adoption. It is readiness. Financial infrastructure rarely fails loudly. It simply stops scaling.
Strategic Q And A
Where do founders underestimate cost first?
AI systems now run continuously. Many teams still model for peak usage instead of sustained operation. The gap appears in compute, monitoring, compliance operations, and incident response long before it shows up in customer metrics.
What do investors misprice in AI driven fintech?
Infrastructure intensity rises faster than application revenue. ARK’s capital data shows control and throughput capture value before features do. Margins do not scale linearly during infrastructure transitions.
Which assumptions break down fastest?
Human initiated workflows. Cost per transaction and average response time lose meaning when systems never pause. Sustained throughput and recovery time under stress become the binding constraints.
Where does policy lag create exposure?
Frameworks assume discrete events. Continuous systems blur those boundaries. Risk appears as operational mismatch rather than enforcement action.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
