Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
July 31, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Competition And Market Structure, Wealth Investing And Trading

On July 30, 2026, U.S.-based Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange, agreed to acquire MarketAxess for US$167 a share in cash, valuing the electronic bond-trading company at about US$5.7 billion. The ICE MarketAxess agreement carries a 33% premium to MarketAxess's previous closing price. Both boards approved the transaction, with closing targeted for the first half of 2027 subject to regulatory approvals.
ICE plans to finance the purchase with new bonds, a term loan and commercial paper. Management forecasts the acquisition to add to adjusted earnings per share in the first full year after closing.
The strategic value is inside the bond trade itself. ICE already sells fixed-income prices, reference data, indices and execution services. MarketAxess brings a network used by about 2,100 institutional investors and dealers, alongside automated execution, all-to-all liquidity and post-trade tools. The acquisition would let one owner serve more of the workflow from price discovery through execution and compliance.
MarketAxess built its position by making institutional bond trading more electronic. Its Open Trading model allows asset managers and dealers to trade with a wider pool of counterparties instead of relying only on a traditional dealer request for quote. The platform also supports portfolio trades, large block orders, automated execution, pricing analytics and regulatory reporting.
The business is large enough to matter and specialized enough to fill a gap for ICE. MarketAxess's 2025 annual report says its clients operate across about 90 countries. Open Trading handled 37% of eligible credit volume on the platform that year, while 86.8% of company revenue came from trading commissions. MarketAxess reported US$846.3 million of 2025 revenue, followed by US$233.4 million in the first quarter of 2026.
In August 2024, the companies agreed to connect their liquidity networks. That work linked ICE TMC with MarketAxess Open Trading across municipal and corporate bonds, extending institutional liquidity toward wealth-management order flow. Ownership would bring the economics, product decisions and customer data from that relationship inside ICE.
The timing also provides some background. MarketAxess entered the deal after losing ground in electronic corporate bond trading. A June 2026 Bank of America assessment estimated that its share had fallen from 57% to 33% over five years as Tradeweb and Trumid gained business. ICE is paying a substantial one-day premium, but it is buying after a longer period of competitive pressure.
The transactions are not identical, but the ownership logic has appeared elsewhere. Kraken's NinjaTrader acquisition combined a large distribution platform with specialist futures execution and regulated market access. ICE is pursuing that model in institutional bonds, where data and workflow tools can be sold alongside execution.
The above group keeps the combined company from owning institutional bond trading outright. The question is whether ICE can use its data, connectivity and customer reach to make MarketAxess more useful than it was as a standalone platform. If more clients price, route, execute and review trades inside the same system, the commercial advantage comes from repeat workflow use rather than a single transaction fee.
The buyer and target already overlap in fixed-income execution, and ICE supplies data used before and after a trade. Regulators will decide whether those businesses remain sufficiently competitive when held together. The review may look at market access, data licensing, fee bundles, interoperability and whether rival venues can obtain the information and connectivity their clients need.
For clients, a unified workflow can reduce system switching, duplicated data and manual reconciliation. However, it can also deepen dependence on one vendor. Asset managers and dealers will watch whether ICE preserves open connections, improves execution quality and keeps pricing competitive across data and trading services.
Canadian institutions are part of the commercial audience even though this is a U.S. transaction. Pension funds, asset managers, banks and dealers in Canada trade global corporate and government debt through international data and execution networks. The deal materials do not disclose MarketAxess's Canadian client count, so the immediate Canadian question is vendor choice rather than a local ownership change.
Canada has already tested one part of a more connected fixed-income workflow. BMO's Canadian bond pilot mirrored a C$250 million deposit-note transaction with Ontario Teachers' on blockchain while the official issuance remained with CDS. That experiment focused on issuance records and payment information rather than electronic bond execution, but it shows why Canadian institutions care about how trading, data and post-trade systems connect.
ICE has been extending its reach across regulated and digital markets, including its OKX investment and futures plan. MarketAxess adds a proven institutional network in traditional fixed income.
When one company supplies the prices, trading network and post-trade tools, does the integrated workflow lower costs for bond investors or make it harder to use a competing venue?
Continue into the fixed-income, digital-market and platform-consolidation developments most closely connected to the transaction.
ICE agreed to pay US$167 in cash for each MarketAxess share. The transaction values MarketAxess at about US$5.7 billion and represents a 33% premium to its closing share price immediately before the announcement.
MarketAxess operates electronic trading platforms for corporate bonds, government bonds, municipal securities, emerging-market debt and other fixed-income products. It also provides pricing data, automated execution and post-trade services to institutional investors and broker-dealers.
MarketAxess would add a large institutional execution network to ICE's fixed-income data, indices, trading venues and post-trade tools. ICE could serve more of each bond trade inside one group and distribute those services across its existing customer base.
Its main electronic fixed-income competitors include Tradeweb, Bloomberg and Trumid, alongside ICE's existing bond venues, broker-dealer systems and other specialist trading networks.
The companies are targeting the first half of 2027. Completion remains subject to regulatory approvals and the other closing conditions in the transaction agreement.
Canadian pension funds, asset managers, banks and dealers trade global bonds and buy international pricing and execution services. A combined ICE and MarketAxess could affect their vendor choice, workflow integration, data access and trading costs even though the transaction does not transfer a Canadian company.
Transaction terms and company figures are based on public disclosures and reporting available on July 31, 2026. The acquisition remains subject to approvals and closing conditions. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
July 28, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Open Banking Open Finance And Data Sharing, Payments And Money Movement, Competition And Market Structure

On July 28, 2026, Credit Connect reported that UK open banking passed one billion cumulative payments and 100 billion cumulative API calls across the CMA9 banks. Both totals cover more than eight years of activity.
The report directly quotes Open Banking Limited CEO Henk Van Hulle. A matching announcement wasn't available in Open Banking Limited's newsroom when this article was prepared, so the cumulative totals are attributed to Credit Connect.
Open Banking Limited's June performance data also shows what the system's baseline is for a single month. It recorded 2.8055 billion successful API calls, a 99.50% success rate and an average response time of 349 milliseconds. Credit Connect reported that API use rose 4.4% from May and response time improved by 50 milliseconds.
June also produced 40.16 million successful open banking payment initiations. Single domestic payments declined 1.2%, while Variable Recurring Payments increased 6.7%.
The cumulative milestone gets attention, but the monthly numbers say more about the current market. Banks are processing billions of API requests while third party providers initiate more than 40 million payments a month. Open banking now supports regular payment activity alongside account information services.
The figures describe different parts of the system. An API call is a request between an authorized provider and a bank. A payment is a successful payment initiation. Open Banking Limited also reports more than 19 million active user connections, but those connections aren't deduplicated individuals. The same customer may be counted through more than one provider or brand.
Payment use has been building quickly. The FCA's 2025 open banking progress report recorded 53% year over year growth in open banking payments. Variable Recurring Payments accounted for 16% of open banking transactions at that point.
The UK now has a functioning base for account to account payments. Banks supply the required APIs, fintechs build payment services and merchants decide whether the cost and customer experience compare favourably with cards and Direct Debit.
Variable Recurring Payments are relatively new to the UK market. UK open banking update tracked approximately 3.7 million VRP transactions in March 2025, along with more than 240 regulated third party providers. It also cited a UK Finance estimate that recurring payments could save merchants approximately £1.5 billion a year.
The July numbers show continued use while the industry develops commercial VRP beyond transfers between a customer's own accounts. Customers can authorize businesses to initiate repeat payments within agreed limits without approving every transaction separately.
On June 2, 2026, the FCA supported the launch of the UK Payments Initiative, an industry operated scheme for commercial Variable Recurring Payments. The FCA expects other commercial schemes to compete with it.
The initiative has substantial industry backing. In 2025, 31 participating firms, including banks, fintechs and payment providers, agreed to fund the initial operator. Proposed uses cover utilities, rail, government agencies, charities and regulated financial services.
The remaining question is how the economics are divided. Banks incur costs to provide premium APIs, while payment providers need pricing low enough to compete for merchants. In January 2026, the FCA and Payment Systems Regulator said they wouldn't prioritize a competition investigation into the proposed centralized access fee model at that stage.
The one billion payment total gives the industry a larger customer base on which to build. It doesn't determine who captures the revenue. Banks may charge for premium access, payment firms may win merchant distribution and software platforms may package recurring payments into billing, treasury and account management products.
The original open banking system was built around a market competition order applied to nine large banks. Commercial schemes now bring more providers, products, pricing agreements and customer relationships into the system.
The FCA expects a new Future Entity to set common API standards, monitor performance, oversee certification and support commercial schemes. Its role will influence whether payment providers receive consistent access across participating banks.
The UK payments playbook connects commercial VRP delivery with retail payment rules, Faster Payments improvements and the future regulatory structure for open banking.
Reliability is already measurable. June's weighted API availability reached 99.80%, while successful calls reached 99.50%. Those averages are interesting, although a customer experiences the individual bank connection used for a particular service or payment.
Fraud still remains part of the operating model. Open Banking Limited's fraud monitor found that roughly one in 6,000 open banking payments was fraudulent in 2025, compared with one in 2,500 across the wider payments industry. Authorized push payment fraud accounted for more than two thirds of reported open banking fraud cases.
The direct Canadian relevance is the connection between data access and payments. Canada is developing consumer driven banking, payment system participation and future write access through separate rules and institutions. The UK experience shows where those files eventually meet through commercial pricing, recurring payment permissions, technical standards, liability and scheme governance.
As commercial VRP expands, who should control access pricing and liability when banks, fintechs and merchants all depend on the same connection?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
July 30, 2026

Image: Pexels/khezez
Fintech is no longer the "new kid" on the financial services block.
Fintech / Alt-Finance is a behemoth industry that attracts billions of dollars of investment annually. And a significant portion of this growth takes place at the trade show floor. Major fintech / alt-finance brands are exhibiting like never before to:
Did you know… Trade shows are now the single most valuable marketing channel for fintech.
The fintech ecosystem is booming. $44.7 billion was invested in fintech globally across 2,216 deals in H1 2025. That's billions of dollars looking for a home. Most of those deals begin with an in-person conversation at a key event.
Trade shows offer fintech brands something ads and cold emails never will: … Face-to-face conversations with actual decision makers.
Take Money 20/20 in Vegas as an example. In October 2025, during the four day event, over 11,000 attendees from 85 countries gathered together to network, learn and "create the future". From banking executives to cryptocurrency founders to policy makers, they were all in the same room.
It's no surprise, then, that events are where fintech companies invest most of their marketing budget. It's also no surprise that selecting the perfect booth builders Las Vegas company has become such an important part of doing it right. When your target demographic is walking past 500 other booths in one hallway, your booth design is what makes them stop.
Here's why trade shows work so well for fintech:
Pretty simple, right?
Financial technology isn't like other industries. And the most forward-thinking fintech brands know that "safe" won't fly for a corporate booth anymore.
Reason being: FinTech offerings are often digital, intangible and cannot be described in a single sentence. Therefore the booth has to carry most of the brand messaging burden. It must illustrate what the technology can do rather than tell them.
The best fintech booths in 2026 are packed with:
And why does this matter? Because fintech events bring senior buyers. 1 out of every 3 attendees at Money 20/20 are C-Suite Executives. You're not pitching to interns. You're pitching to CEOs, CTOs and heads of product who control budgets.
It means every square foot of your booth has to earn its keep. If a Chief Product Officer passes by and does not "get" your product in 3 seconds they will move on.
FinTech Trade show designs used to be "pretty". Now they are "functional". Create an experience.
Alt finance refers to alternative finance. It is currently the fastest growing segment of the fintech industry. Alt finance consists of:
You're seeing these companies BIG at trade shows this year. Alt finance brands have a trust issue. Consumers are still uncertain if they should entrust their money with a non-bank. Meeting the team face-to-face solves that problem overnight.
Alt-finance brands are also using trade shows to:
Think about how buy now pay later brands have exploded in the last few years. 3-4 years ago most retailers had never heard of BNPL. Now they seem to be everywhere. And where did most of those retail partnerships come from? Trade shows.
Payments growth is another reason alt finance is exploding. $2.4 trillion in Global payments revenue was generated in 2023 alone. This number will grow to $3.1 trillion by 2028. That's trillion with a T. Alt-finance brands are battling it out to get their slice of the pie.
Here's something a lot of fintech founders don't realise…
Your booth is their first experience with your product. Before they download your app or signup for a demo, they're going to see your booth. If your booth looks cheap, boring or confusing, they will assume your product does too.
That's why booth design has become so important. You want your fintech booth to feel:
Doing all three of those things correctly is difficult. That's where a professional booth builder comes in handy. They understand how to represent your fintech brand with an attractive booth that will draw attention for all the right reasons.
The best booth builders will help you with:
Don't leave your design decisions to the week of the show. Booths that wow are crafted weeks, sometimes months in advance.
The return on that investment is huge. One survey found that 73% of financial services firms plan to increase spending on digital marketing in 2025. Event marketing is getting a big piece of that pie because the ROI is so great.
It's safe to say that FinTech and alt-finance companies are dominating trade shows now more than ever. In fact, this trend is only going to continue growing. Billions of dollars are poured into fintech each year, and the fight for anyone's attention is getting more and more competitive. Finding ways to stand out on an overcrowded show floor has become tablestakes. Literally the difference between:
To quickly recap:
Only the fintech brands taking tradeshows seriously as a bona fide marketing channel are gaining ground. The rest are just showing face.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
July 30, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Wealth Investing And Trading, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Identity Privacy And Data Governance

On July 23, 2026, Questrade published beta documentation for a direct connection between selected Canadian investment accounts and AI agents. The Questrade MCP beta currently supports Claude and Claude Code. With the customer's permission, an agent can read approved account and market data, discuss the portfolio and draft an order for review.
Here is the important boundary. Trading permission is switched on separately, and Questrade requires the customer to approve the order before it is submitted. The agent can help get a trade ready. It cannot trade independently in the account.
A general chatbot can discuss markets. Questrade MCP can work with the investor's authorized account data. Once connected, the agent can retrieve approved balances, positions, orders and market information, then combine that context with outside research.
Questrade's live documentation describes both read and write access, although "write" doesn't mean autonomous trading. The agent prepares the instruction. The customer sees the symbol, buy or sell direction, order type, quantity, price, estimated cost and commission, then approves it through Questrade. The agent can't skip that review or place, change or cancel the order on its own.
Customers choose the accounts and permissions. They can share data without allowing trade drafting, and they can revoke the connection through Questrade's API settings. There is an important catch.
Questrade says revocation stops future access but does not remove information already shared with the AI provider. Closing the connection and retrieving previously shared data are two different things.
The connection becomes more interesting beside Custom Indexing. Launched in June, the product uses templates, fractional shares and one click rebalancing across as many as 600 securities. Questrade now says an agent can help build a custom index too. A conversation can therefore produce a structured group of proposed orders, with the customer still deciding whether to proceed.
The timing is hard to ignore. In March, CIRO guidance gave execution only dealers more room to provide tailored education, alerts and other decision support. The core restriction remains. These dealers cannot recommend a security.
Questrade MCP puts that boundary in front of a real customer. The agent can discuss actual holdings and turn a plain language request into a draft order. Questrade says the analysis, orders and custom indices come from the agent and are not its advice or recommendations. The customer is expected to check the work and approve the result.
The disclaimer doesn't settle every responsibility. Questrade still controls authentication, account permissions, the order screen and execution. CIRO's 2026 compliance report says examiners will ask how dealers use AI and test the controls around it. The IOSCO AI toolkit raises similar questions about accountability, data, monitoring and third party providers. Neither regulator has publicly approved Questrade MCP as a product.
Operators will want to see the working details. When does a prompt become an instruction? When might an answer sound like a recommendation? What happens if the agent uses stale information, mistakes a ticker or drafts the wrong order type? A clean record of the request, response, draft and final approval will be just as important as the chat experience.
Questrade enters an active race. Interactive Brokers connected accounts to Claude, ChatGPT and Grok in June. Its customers can research markets and prepare instructions for equities, ETFs, options and futures, but they approve every trade. That is the closest public comparison to Questrade's current model.
Robinhood has gone further in the United States. Its Agentic Account gives a third party agent a dedicated budget and allows trades without direct approval each time. Robinhood warns that the agent can make mistakes, customers can lose their entire investment and the customer remains responsible for monitoring the account.
Questrade's version is closer to assisted execution. The agent can see the authorized account and prepare the action, while Questrade keeps the approval gate. It gives up some autonomy in exchange for a visible decision before each order.
The contest isn't limited to AI connectors. Wealthsimple and bank owned brokerages are already competing to become the main Canadian investment account. Questrade is assembling zero commission trading, real time fractional shares, Custom Indexing and agent access while its parent prepares Questbank. We don't yet know whether customers will use these products together or treat them as separate features.
Where it could work A customer can ask about a portfolio, research an idea and prepare an order without copying balances and tickers between several screens. Custom Indexing could make that especially useful for people managing many positions.
Where it could get messy The account data may be current while the outside information is incomplete. An agent can misunderstand an instruction or produce analysis that a customer hears as advice. The approval screen helps before execution, but it can't resolve every question involving data retention, explanation or customer understanding.
Questrade already has regulated execution, a large Canadian customer base and more than C$80 billion in assets under administration. The open question is usage. If customers repeatedly research and prepare orders through an agent, MCP becomes another front door to the brokerage. If they mostly ask for balances, it remains a convenient connector.
When an AI agent can read a portfolio and prepare a trade, which controls keep useful assistance from becoming an unintended order or advice the dealer isn't allowed to give?
Edward Kholodenko founded Questrade in Toronto in 1999. The company built its early position by offering self directed investors a lower cost alternative to bank owned brokerages.
QuestradeCanadian online brokerage
FormationDigital brokerage entry
PrivateFounder led financial group
CanadaCanadian and US securities access
Self Directed InvestorsCanadians seeking lower trading costs
Bank BrokeragesPrice and digital access define the early contest
The brokerage account created the regulated customer and execution base behind Questrade's later products. Agent access now enters through that same account relationship.
Continue into the regulated AI, brokerage competition and banking developments most closely connected to Questrade.
Questrade MCP remains in beta, and supported agents, permissions and features may change. Product claims are attributed to Questrade and regulatory context is identified separately. This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial or legal advice.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |