Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
AI Policy Consultation | February 11, 2026
On February 5, 2026, Innovation Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) released the official Engagements on Canada’s Next AI Strategy Summary of Inputs. The report summarizes a 30 day consultation that ran from October 1 to 31, 2025 and confirms that 11,300 participants submitted 64,600 responses across 26 policy questions about Canada’s next AI strategy.
The consultation addressed the full AI policy landscape, including research and talent, adoption across industry and government, education and skills, infrastructure resilience, national security, environmental sustainability, Indigenous data sovereignty and inclusion. The process ran under The Honourable Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, supported by a National AI Strategy Task Force composed of startup operators, investors, researchers and civil society leaders.
This article focuses on what matters most for fintech founders and investors, where the strongest inputs from the consultation relate to capital formation, procurement design, intellectual property retention and domestic scaling incentives.
The consultation drew wide participation. 83% submitted as individuals. 17% responded on behalf of organizations, and reflected national engagement across technology, finance, academia, professional services and public institutions.
52% identified as interested Canadians. 19% came from business. 13% represented academia or research. The rest included government, associations and other sectors.
Ontario accounted for 39% of responses. British Columbia 20.6%. Alberta 7.8%. Québec 7.6%.
Across submissions, one theme stood out. Canada produces AI research. It struggles to anchor AI companies at scale.
Respondents called for sovereign capital vehicles, modernization of SR&ED and IRAP, and stronger intellectual property retention frameworks. Intellectual property retention refers to keeping ownership of core technology, patents and data assets inside Canada rather than transferring them through early acquisition or foreign incorporation. Stakeholders expressed a preference for patient domestic capital tied to retention conditions, not simply additional grants. That implies potential co-investment models, domestic head office commitments and scaling tools designed to prevent early exits or foreign acquisition.
Canada ranks among global leaders in AI research output. Yet growth stage capital is still significantly thinner than in the United States. In 2025, Canadian VC firms raised just over $2.1B, with fundraising concentrating as the five largest Canadian venture funds captured 83% of all capital raised while emerging managers raised $249M. That level of concentration narrows the number of scaled domestic capital sources available to support long runway AI and fintech growth.
When companies reach scale, many incorporate abroad or raise major rounds outside Canadian markets. Capital migration reduces ownership, long term tax capacity and domestic control over strategic assets. This consultation reflects recognition that Canada’s scaling architecture requires structural reform.
For fintech founders following new AI minister prioritizes growth over rules, this reinforces the need for commercialization outcomes and ownership durability rather than additional regulatory layering.
Respondents pushed for standardized procurement playbooks and real pathways from pilot to deployment. Suggestions were for coordinated procurement models that create anchor customers at scale.
Predictable domestic revenue reduces investor risk perception and strengthens valuations. It also strengthens Canadian firms’ credibility when competing internationally. Procurement design therefore influences capital formation and competitive positioning.
This matters most in regulated sectors. When government adoption aligns with frameworks such as the CIRO digital asset custody framework, compliance becomes a strategic advantage rather than a cost centre. Procurement validation can reinforce regulatory credibility and accelerate scaling.
Participants identified gaps in domestic compute capacity and reliance on foreign cloud providers. Calls for Canadian controlled infrastructure go beyond just hardware investment. They imply potential changes to data residency expectations, cloud dependency exposure and compliance thresholds.
Sovereign compute investment could open infrastructure financing opportunities while raising entry costs for firms dependent on foreign controlled platforms. Infrastructure choices influence market structure.
Submissions supported proportionate, risk tiered regulatory frameworks, independent audits and clearer liability standards. Respondents generally favoured governance models where obligations scale with actual risk exposure rather than one size fits all rules.
Regulatory preference was for clarity, predictability and alignment between risk level and compliance burden. High impact AI applications would face stronger safeguards, while lower risk use cases would not carry unnecessary constraints.
If thresholds are calibrated carefully and compliance pathways are clear, early stage firms gain certainty and investors price regulatory exposure more confidently. If risk categories are broad or implementation complex, governance costs rise and time to market slows.
The strategic issue is how regulatory architecture affects scaling speed, capital formation and Canada’s cost competitiveness relative to larger markets. Governance design influences who scales, who consolidates and who exits.
The consultation closed on October 31, 2025. The Engagement on Canada's Next AI Strategy summary report states that the inputs will inform drafting of Canada’s 2026 AI strategy, which the federal government plans to release later this year.
The report doesn't however specify any fiscal commitments or program design details. Those decisions will appear, if at all, in the final strategy document and subsequent budget measures.
From a market perspective, founders and investors should watch for concrete triggers for a sovereign capital vehicle with defined funding, commercialization linked SR&ED reform, procurement commitments beyond pilot programs, budget allocations for domestic compute infrastructure, and enforceable intellectual property safeguards.
If those elements appear with timelines and capital attached, they strengthen Canada's domestic scaling environment. If not, capital migration and entrepreneur drain will likely persist. The final strategy with design and implementation choices will be known this year.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Feb 4, 2026 | NCFA Expert Intelligence | AI Risk and Governance

On February 3 2026, Dentons published a Voice from the Market North American Legal AI report following the firm’s inaugural Legal AI Summit. The report captures data insights from legal, business, and operations leaders across sectors about how organizations are handling real world AI deployment, specifically where AI adoption is creating legal and governance risk before regulators provide clear framework.
The findings matter for fintech founders and operators because legal teams are often the first to see where risk accumulates, such as in contracts, vendor relationships, employee use, and product liability, long before the market or regulators respond.
Most organizations in the survey reported they are designing their own AI governance frameworks because universal regulations do not exist yet. That gap puts legal risk in the critical path for AI use inside financial products and services.
“We want to cover the basics, but we don’t want to stymie innovation or scare people away with too many ‘do nots.’”
This comment above is from a survey participant highlighting the tension leaders face: Smart governance is needed, but overly prescriptive rules can impede experimentation and execution. So it's a real operational conflict that stakeholders must resolve long before policy catches up.
The governance gaps in the report align with real risks fintechs already encounter:
Many fintechs are building AI capability faster than they are formalizing guardrails, which can expose firms to legal, operational, and compliance risk across functions where AI is integrated in workflows. Whether that's in credit decisions, document review, marketing, fraud monitoring, or customer support.
It also intersects with other areas NCFA has covered. For example, recent regulatory signals from the CSA–CIRO joint finfluencer guidance and the rise of stablecoin policy frameworks both show that Canada’s regulatory perimeter is tightening around behaviour and risk, not just product categories.
If legal risk surfaces first in AI contracts, vendor relationships, and internal use, where should fintechs build their earliest governance guardrails: in contracts, in internal policy, or in product design?
Regulation typically always lags innovation. Legal and governance frameworks are being created inside enterprises today because no universal rulebook exists. Fintech innovators and operators who anticipate these gaps and embed guardrails early will be better positioned to scale responsibly and avoid costly legal exposure down the road.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada’s Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Jan 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Capital and Funding

Image: Freepik AI
On January 27 2026, CVCA and the Government of Canada’s Trade Commissioner Service released the 2026 edition of The 50, an annual guide that presents Canada’s venture capital market to international investors, strategic partners, and market participants.
The release makes two practical points that matter for founders and fund managers. First, The 50 does not rank firms. It profiles venture managers across sectors including software, applied artificial intelligence, life sciences, and advanced technologies. Second, it is built to travel. CVCA says the guide supports engagement through the Trade Commissioner Service global network spanning more than 160 cities worldwide.
That distribution detail is the real asset. Canadian venture often struggles with visibility outside the usual circles. A guide that is designed for outbound use changes how conversations start with foreign limited partners, corporate partners, and co investors. It also helps founders understand which managers actively shape the market today, not just who raised a big fund last cycle.
Brenda Hogan, Chief Investment Officer, Venture Ontario, and Chair, The 50 Committee:
“Canada’s venture market is defined by managers who combine discipline with the ability to support companies as they scale across markets. The firms included here reflect that reality. They are backing businesses that operate globally, manage capital carefully, and deliver outcomes investors can underwrite with confidence.”
If you want the working version, CVCA hosts the guide online. You can explore The 50 2026 edition directly.
The timing also ties into deal flow and capital conversations in 2026. CVCA notes that international investors and partners can engage with Canada’s private capital community at Invest Canada ’26, taking place May 26 to 28 2026 in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
If Canada wants more cross border capital and more late stage wins, what changes first, the number of global investor relationships, or the quality of proof points that keep them coming back?
This release is akin to market infrastructure for capital. When more global investors can quickly understand who deploys capital in Canada and how those managers operate, founders get more shots at the right conversations, earlier.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
January 23, 2026

Choosing the right display for your PC can significantly impact your productivity, entertainment experience, and overall satisfaction. Two of the most popular options available today are projectors and monitors. Each has its advantages and drawbacks, and the best choice ultimately depends on your specific needs, environment, and usage patterns. In this comprehensive comparison, we break down the key differences between projectors and monitors to help you decide which is the ideal choice for your PC setup.
On the other hand, if you are on the hunt for a platform wherein you can play card games, be sure to visit GameZone Pinoy games.
A projector is a device that casts a visual image onto a large surface, typically a wall or projection screen. Projectors vary in size, resolution, brightness, and price, but all share the basic function of turning a flat surface into a large display area. Projectors are widely used in home theaters, business presentations, and classrooms.
Projectors typically connect to a PC via HDMI, USB-C, or wireless display adapters. Modern projectors can deliver high definition (HD) and 4K resolution and even support HDR content.
A monitor is a dedicated display screen designed to show visuals with clarity and precision. Monitors come in various sizes, resolutions, refresh rates, and panel types such as IPS, TN, and VA. They are the standard display for desktops, laptops, and gaming PCs.
Unlike projectors, monitors have built-in screens with consistent brightness levels, reliable color accuracy, and support for fast refresh rates that benefit gaming and professional work.
When evaluating whether to buy a projector or a monitor for your PC, it helps to compare them across several essential criteria:
Projector
The most obvious advantage of a projector is its ability to produce a large image. Depending on the model and throw distance, you can create a display that ranges from 60 inches up to 150 inches or more. This makes projectors ideal for home cinema, group presentations, and immersive media consumption.
However, the viewing quality heavily depends on the projection surface and ambient light conditions. A darker room and a dedicated projection screen will deliver the best results.
Monitor
Monitors offer precise, consistent image quality at fixed sizes, typically between 21 inches and 49 inches for consumer displays. While they cannot match the sheer size of a projector image, monitors provide sharp visuals ideal for close-up work like graphic design, spreadsheets, and gaming.
Monitors are also easier to position and use without worrying about distance or external light sources.
Projector
Projectors have come a long way in image quality. Modern units support Full HD (1080p) and 4K resolution, and some models offer enhanced color and contrast. However, due to projection optics and surface limitations, projectors may not deliver the same sharpness and detail as monitors of similar resolution.
Brightness is another concern. Measured in lumens, projector brightness affects how well the image holds up in well-lit environments. Unless you choose a high-lumens model, bright rooms can wash out the projected image.
Monitor
Monitors generally deliver superior image clarity and crispness at similar resolutions. Because they generate their own light, monitors perform well in any lighting condition and maintain consistent brightness. This makes them ideal for tasks where accurate visuals matter, such as photo editing or video production.
High-end monitors can also offer professional color accuracy with wide color gamut support (sRGB, Adobe RGB, DCI-P3), which is crucial for creative professionals.
Projector
Projectors require more setup consideration. You’ll need space for the projector, a flat wall or screen, and sufficient throw distance to achieve the desired screen size. Mounting options include ceiling mounts or placing the projector on a desk or shelf.
Cables may need to be routed carefully, and you might need additional accessories like speakers if the projector’s built-in audio is insufficient.
Monitor
Monitors are generally plug-and-play. They fit well on desks, require minimal setup, and have straightforward cable connections (HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-C). Monitors also take up less physical space and don’t require external screens or darkened rooms.
Projector
Projectors are not typically designed for performance-intensive tasks like gaming or professional productivity. Input lag, refresh rates, and response times tend to lag behind monitors. While some projectors improve these specs, they still cannot match gaming monitors with high refresh rates (144 Hz, 240 Hz) or low response times (1 ms).
For presentations, multimedia, and casual gaming, projectors can perform well, but competitive gaming or fast-paced tasks may suffer.
Monitor
Monitors excel in performance applications. Gaming monitors offer high refresh rates and adaptive sync technologies like FreeSync and G-SYNC, which reduce screen tearing and improve visual smoothness. Productivity monitors often include ergonomic stands, multiple ports, and split-screen software support.
If you rely on your PC for work, creative projects, or gaming sessions, a monitor is usually the better choice.
Projector
Projectors can vary widely in price. Budget models may start under $300, while high-end 4K cinema projectors can exceed $2,000. Remember that projectors may also require additional expenses such as a screen, mounting hardware, and external speakers.
Projectors offer excellent value if your priority is a large display experience in a dedicated media room.
Monitor
Monitors also vary in price, from affordable options under $150 to professional-grade displays over $1,000. For the average user, a mid-range monitor (1080p or 1440p) offers excellent performance for both work and play.
Monitors tend to deliver better overall value for everyday PC tasks due to their simplicity and versatility.
When deciding between a projector and a monitor for your PC, your choice should match your primary use case. A projector can transform your space into a home theater and deliver an impressive screen size for shared viewing. A monitor, on the other hand, delivers superior clarity, performance, and ease of use for daily computing tasks, gaming, and professional work.
Before purchasing, consider your room size, lighting conditions, budget, and how you intend to use your PC. By aligning these factors with the strengths of each display type, you can make an informed decision that enhances your computing experience.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |