Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
October 5, 2026 | Last Updated October 5, 2026 | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime, Fintech And Innovation

On October 5, 2026, Toronto based fintech Snaplii presented Snaplii Cash as a separate wallet for AI agent spending, letting users fund a limited balance instead of giving software access to a bank account or stored card. The payment system itself isn't new today. Snaplii launched its Agent to Merchant payment skill on April 29 and published detailed Muse payment controls on October 1. Today's announcement makes the consumer proposition clearer and adds cashback to the pitch.
Snaplii is making a specific payment choice. The agent gets enough money to complete a purchase without gaining access to the account that funded it. Visa, Stripe and OpenAI are tackling the same problem differently, using restricted credentials or permission tied to a particular transaction.
The current Muse payment setup starts with a Snaplii Cash balance. Canadian users can add money by Interac e Transfer, while U.S. users can use Apple Pay. The user then creates an API key and gives it to Muse. Snaplii says there is no bank login, account link or stored card for the agent to reach.
The user chooses a daily limit of $100, $200, $500 or $1,000. Snaplii enforces that limit outside the agent and says Muse cannot read or raise it. Users can create separate keys for different agents and revoke each one independently. The wallet balance provides another limit because spending stops when the available money runs out.
Spencer Xu, Founder and CEO, Snaplii:
“You wouldn't hand a new assistant your credit card on day one. You'd give them a budget.”
Once access is set up, Muse can shop within the permission the user has already granted. In Snaplii's documented flow, the agent finds the item, prices the order, buys a gift card sized for the purchase and applies it at checkout. The merchant receives an ordinary gift card value, so it doesn't need a separate Snaplii integration for that transaction.
Snaplii reports more than 350,000 users, more than US$100 million in annual app transaction volume and more than 500 partner brands. Its October 5 announcement also cites cashback of 10% at DoorDash, 3% at Uber Eats and up to 15% at selected brands.
The extra separation comes with a bit of friction. Snaplii Cash cannot be withdrawn to a bank account and is used for future gift card purchases. Users therefore have to move money into another balance before an agent can spend it. That limits what the agent can reach, but it also gives the customer another pool of money to manage.
Other payment companies are giving agents controlled spending access without requiring a separate funded wallet. Other payment companies are giving agents controlled spending access without requiring a separate funded wallet. A Canadian card based example is the AI purchase involving Mastercard, Flybits and Rogers Bank. The approaches below put similar limits in different places.
| Approach | How Spending Is Limited | Main Advantage | Main Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snaplii | Separate funded balance plus a user set daily limit | The documented Muse flow keeps the agent away from the user's bank and stored card credentials | The user has to fund and manage another balance |
| Visa Intelligent Commerce | An agent specific token is linked to an existing Visa card and checked against user instructions | The user keeps the existing card relationship while the agent receives a restricted credential | The card remains the funding source, so token and network rules carry more of the control |
| Stripe Link with Muse | The user approves each purchase and Link can issue a single use virtual card when needed | The agent does not receive the underlying payment details and permission stays close to the purchase | The user still approves the transaction total |
| OpenAI delegated payments | A one time payment request sets a maximum amount and expiry | The amount and duration of the payment permission are both limited | The merchant and its payment provider still complete the payment |
Snaplii limits the pool of money the agent can reach. Visa limits the credential it can use. Stripe keeps permission close to the individual purchase. OpenAI limits the payment request by amount and time.
Visa says its system can check payment credential requests against the customer's authenticated instructions and confirm that the merchant authorization matches the request. Stripe's Muse integration is already live for U.S. consumers. At more than one million businesses that accept Link, Muse can use a saved payment method after the consumer approves the transaction. Elsewhere, Link can issue a single use virtual card for the approved purchase.
These controls can restrict how much money an agent reaches. They cannot tell whether it chose the right product, ordered the right quantity or understood the request correctly. An agent can also stay inside its spending limit while reacting badly to misleading content or choosing a merchant the customer would not have picked.
Important limits are stronger when the payment or financial system enforces them outside the AI model. The agent can still make a bad decision inside the permission it has been given. For more on this issue, see financial AI agent control failures.
Snaplii offers 120 day purchase protection for problems including inactive gift cards, incorrect balances and delivery of the wrong brand. Its policy excludes buyer's remorse, several redemption problems, lost cards and merchant insolvency. That isn't the same protection model as a conventional credit card dispute.
AI agents don't need access to all of a customer's money to become useful shoppers. Snaplii puts the spending limit around a separate wallet. Visa, Stripe and OpenAI put more of the control around credentials and individual transactions. The stronger model may be the one that gives agents enough room to act without adding more payment work than the automation removes.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
October 1, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Payments And Money Movement, Competition And Market Structure, Regulation And Policy

On October 1, 2026, Payments Canada added six more new members, bringing new admissions since membership eligibility widened one year ago to 22. Twenty of the 22 became eligible because federal changes opened Payments Canada membership to regulated payment service providers, qualifying local credit unions and designated clearing houses.
The latest members are Bounce Pay, FIS Everlink, Nium, Pesa, Remitly and Vancity. This is the first anniversary of a permanent access reform, not the end of an intake period. Eligible organizations can still apply for Payments Canada membership.
Before September 2025, many regulated payment companies and local credit unions were not legally eligible to become Payments Canada members. Federal amendments took effect on September 29, 2025, adding payment service providers supervised under the Retail Payment Activities Act, local credit unions that belong to a central and designated clearing houses. Payments Canada then updated its bylaws and participation rules for the new member categories. Twenty organizations have now joined through eligibility created by those changes.
Payments Canada operates Lynx and the Automated Clearing Settlement System and is building the Real-Time Rail. It had 111 members at the end of 2025, and its systems cleared and settled approximately $103 trillion that year, or more than $411 billion every business day.
Donna Kinoshita, Chief Payments Officer at Payments Canada:
“Welcoming 22 members in our first year under the expanded eligibility framework demonstrates the industry’s strong desire to modernize payments,”
The 22 additions are split between Canadian companies and international payment groups operating in Canada. Fourteen (64%) are Canadian headquartered organizations. Eight (36%) are Canadian member entities connected to groups headquartered outside Canada. Canadian entrants include fintechs, payment companies and four credit unions, while the international group includes Wise, Currencycloud, Ebury, Shaype, Adyen, FIS Everlink, Nium and Remitly.
| New member | Membership announced | Main business | Group headquarters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wise Payments Canada | Jan. 27, 2026 | International payments | London, United Kingdom |
| Float Financial Solutions | Jan. 27, 2026 | Business payments and spend management | Toronto, Canada |
| KOHO Financial | Jan. 27, 2026 | Consumer financial services and payments | Toronto, Canada |
| Paramount Commerce | Jan. 27, 2026 | Bank account payments | Toronto, Canada |
| Brim Financial | Jan. 27, 2026 | Card and payment technology | Toronto, Canada |
| Meridian Credit Union | Mar. 19, 2026 | Credit union | Ontario, Canada |
| DoBusiness.com | Apr. 16, 2026 | Business payment software | Vaughan, Canada |
| Neo Financial | May 5, 2026 | Digital financial services | Calgary, Canada |
| Tru Cooperative Bank | May 13, 2026 | Bank | British Columbia, Canada |
| Currencycloud, a Visa company | 2026 | Cross border payment infrastructure | London, United Kingdom |
| Beem Credit Union | Jun. 3, 2026 | Credit union | British Columbia, Canada |
| Ebury Partners Canada | Jun. 3, 2026 | Cross border payments and foreign exchange | London, United Kingdom |
| Shaype Canada Financial | Jun. 3, 2026 | Payment infrastructure | Sydney, Australia |
| Libro Credit Union | Jun. 3, 2026 | Credit union | London, Canada |
| Newton Crypto | Jun. 3, 2026 | Digital asset trading | Toronto, Canada |
| Adyen Canada | Jul. 14, 2026 | Global payment processing | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Bounce Pay | Oct. 1, 2026 | Consumer and merchant payments | Canada |
| FIS Everlink | Oct. 1, 2026 | Payment infrastructure | Jacksonville, United States |
| Nium Canada | Oct. 1, 2026 | Global payments | Singapore / San Francisco |
| Pesa | Oct. 1, 2026 | Cross border payments | Canada |
| Remitly Canada | Oct. 1, 2026 | International remittances | Seattle, United States |
| Vancity | Oct. 1, 2026 | Credit union | Vancouver, Canada |
The first five payment service providers entered in January, Meridian followed in March, and DoBusiness.com joined in April. By June, Payments Canada membership had widened further to include more credit unions, foreign exchange providers and digital finance companies.
Payments Canada membership doesn't give a company automatic direct access to Lynx, the Automated Clearing Settlement System or the forthcoming Real-Time Rail. Membership allows an organization to apply for participation. Connecting directly still requires the technical, operational, security and settlement arrangements set by each payment system.
The first year shows real uptake. Twenty two organizations have joined Payments Canada since the rules changed, including payment companies and credit unions that previously were not eligible for membership. Having said that, there's not yet enough public evidence to say the reform has lowered payment costs, reduced reliance on intermediaries or produced stronger price competition for businesses and consumers.
The Real-Time Rail participation requirements include system integration, testing, fraud controls and operational readiness, with additional settlement requirements depending on how a participant connects. User acceptance testing is complete and integrated performance testing is underway, while Payments Canada continues to target a late fourth quarter 2026 launch.
The first RTR phase starts with direct exchange participants, with more participants and Interac e-Transfer clearing and settlement expected to follow in stages. Several of the newest members are already looking beyond membership. Bounce Pay says it intends to participate on the RTR, while Pesa, Nium, Remitly and FIS Everlink connect their membership to deeper participation in Canada's payment infrastructure.
Direct participation could give some payment businesses more control over routing, settlement and product design while reducing some intermediary dependencies. Whether those advantages reach customers will depend on which firms connect, how much payment volume they process and whether they can turn infrastructure access into lower costs, faster services or new products.
Twenty of 22 new members became eligible because Ottawa changed the law, and almost two thirds of the first year cohort is Canadian headquartered. The membership reform has therefore changed who can participate in Payments Canada. The Real-Time Rail will show whether that wider participation changes how payments are built, priced and delivered in Canada.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
September 29, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Venture Funding And Building

On September 28, 2026, Shopify expanded WebMCP checkout support, allowing compatible AI browser agents to read and update eligible checkouts and submit orders after buyer approval. The Ottawa based commerce company now lets software agents move beyond product discovery and cart management into checkout itself, while keeping purchase approval and payment authority under separate controls.
Shopify already exposes product search, store browsing and cart functions to agents. Checkout is an important addition because the software can now move from helping someone shop to executing a real transaction. Can the agent spend on its own? No. Shopify still separates what the agent can do inside checkout from what the customer can authorize and what the payment provider will accept.
Shopify says millions of businesses in more than 175 countries use its commerce infrastructure, which processed US$378 billion in gross merchandise volume in 2025. A Canadian company operating at that scale is now helping define how software agents enter commerce without turning access to checkout into open authority over a customer's money.
WebMCP lets a website expose specific functions directly to a compatible browser agent. Instead of inspecting a page and trying to work out which field or button to use, the agent can see the actions Shopify makes available and the information each action requires. It improves transaction reliability because checkout needs predictable actions and an accurate view of the order, while product discovery can tolerate more browser trial and error.
Shopify first exposed WebMCP tools for storefronts on August 5, 2026, letting agents search products, browse stores, manage carts and take shoppers to checkout. The September release extends that access so the agent can read the current checkout, update supported information and submit the order after the customer approves it. Contact details, fulfillment choices, discounts and some payment information can be changed, while the agent and customer continue working from the same checkout state.
Access isn't universal though. Shopify excludes several flows, including B2B checkout, embedded checkout, draft orders, order edits and payment collection. Standard three page checkout is also excluded unless the customer uses Shop Pay. Merchants do not need to install a separate WebMCP app for eligible sessions, giving Shopify a way to expose agent access through infrastructure merchants already use rather than requiring a new integration for every AI shopping service.
Browser WebMCP also differs from Shopify's server based commerce tools. WebMCP operates inside the shopper's open browser tab, while Checkout MCP lets an agent service interact with checkout from its own server. Both use Shopify's Universal Commerce Protocol checkout model. Shopify is turning parts of checkout into functions software can call directly while retaining control over which functions it exposes.
If an agent can operate checkout, who controls the purchase? Shopify requires the customer to review the current order and total before the agent can submit it. If the amount changes, the agent has to ask again. Permission therefore applies to the transaction the customer sees, not to an open instruction that allows the agent to keep spending.
Shopify also keeps agent identity separate from purchase authority. Web Bot Auth can identify a registered agent, but recognition doesn't provide the software permission to place an order. Payment access is even more narrow. Checkout WebMCP doesn't accept new card details. An eligible saved Shop Pay card can be selected, while other payment methods or authentication steps may return control directly to the customer. Shop Pay login and 3D Secure are examples.
The transaction is controlled by several parties. Shopify decides what the agent can do inside checkout, the customer decides whether the current purchase should proceed, and the payment provider decides whether the credential can be used and whether more authentication is required. That separation between agent identity and financial authorization becomes more important as AI agents evolve from recommending products to initiating real transactions.
In September, Mastercard, Flybits and Rogers Bank demonstrated an AI shopping assistant completing a card purchase after the customer supplied buying instructions and a spending limit. Mastercard Agent Pay operates around the credential, agent identity and instructions attached to the payment. Shopify controls what the agent can do inside merchant checkout.
Are Shopify and Mastercard trying to own the same part of agent commerce? Not really. One controls access to the merchant transaction. The other operates where payment credentials and authorization take over. As AI performs more of the purchase, those separate control points become easier to see.
If shopping assistants become easy to reproduce, more valuable infrastructure may develop around checkout access, agent identity, payment credentials, spending limits, merchant restrictions, fraud controls and records showing who approved what. A founder doesn't need to build another shopping assistant to participate in agent commerce. There are products to build between the assistant and the transaction.
See: Circle Builds USDC Payment Infrastructure for AI Agents
Discovery, checkout, credential use and authentication don't have to belong to one company. Different providers can control each function, which makes the handoffs commercially important. Companies that become difficult to remove from those handoffs may capture value even if consumers rarely recognize their names.
Product discovery may happen inside ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or another agent rather than on a merchant storefront. Does that weaken Shopify's position? It can reduce Shopify's control over the first interaction, but the transaction can still reach Shopify checkout, merchant systems and payment infrastructure. Shopify can remain part of the economic relationship even when another platform owns the conversation that starts the purchase.
Structured agent access also creates another route into checkout without requiring every AI system to interpret the storefront visually. The commercial evidence is still early, but the technical capability now exists. The market still has to prove whether consumers want agents doing enough purchasing to create a significantly different commerce channel and whether merchants see enough value to change how they manage sales, fraud and customer relationships.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Sep 25, 2026

Choosing a payment gateway is one of the first infrastructure decisions a Canadian e-commerce founder makes - and one of the hardest to reverse.
Switching processors later means re-tokenizing cards, reconfiguring checkout flows, reconciling historical data, and often pausing growth while engineering catches up. Get it wrong early, and you pay twice: in fees and in the operational drag of failed payments, chargebacks, and support tickets your team was not staffed to handle.
Before you commit, run a full payment gateways comparison - Stripe, PayPal, and Adyen each handle refunds, chargebacks, and authentication flows differently, which directly affects your post-checkout support burden.
This guide is for founders, operators, and fintech-curious investors evaluating Stripe, PayPal, and Adyen for Canadian online businesses in 2026. It covers what each platform does well, where they fall short, and how payment choices ripple into customer support, compliance, and unit economics.
Canada's e-commerce market continues to mature, but founders face a specific set of constraints:
Payment processors are no longer "backend plumbing." They are front-line infrastructure for conversion, fraud prevention, and regulatory posture - especially as AI-driven commerce and embedded finance reshape checkout experiences across the ecosystem NCFA Canada covers daily.
Before comparing logos, define what your business actually needs:
| Criterion | Questions to ask |
| Checkout conversion | Does it support one-click, wallets, local methods, and mobile-optimized flows? |
| CAD settlement | How fast do funds arrive in your Canadian bank account? |
| Multi-currency | Can you charge in USD/EUR without a separate entity? |
| Fraud & 3DS | How are SCA, 3D Secure, and high-risk transactions handled? |
| Disputes & chargebacks | What tooling exists for evidence submission and win rates? |
| Platform fit | Native Shopify, custom stack, marketplace, or subscription billing? |
| Support load | Do payment errors generate customer tickets you must resolve manually? |
The cheapest per-transaction rate is meaningless if failed authorizations and confused shoppers create a support queue that scales linearly with revenue.
| Stripe | PayPal | Adyen | |
| Best for | Developer-led DTC, SaaS, subscriptions | Consumer trust, quick launch, marketplaces | Enterprise, omnichannel, high volume |
| Canadian SMB fit | Excellent (Shopify, APIs) | Strong (brand recognition) | Moderate (overkill for early stage) |
| Setup complexity | Low–medium | Low | Medium–high |
| Typical pricing | ~2.9% + $0.30 CAD (varies) | ~2.9% + fixed fee (varies) | Interchange++ (custom quotes) |
| Wallet / PayPal button | Via Stripe | Native | Supported |
| Subscription billing | Strong (Billing) | Basic | Strong |
| In-person / POS | Terminal available | Zettle | Unified commerce strength |
| Ideal stage | Seed to scale | Launch to growth | Scale to enterprise |
Strengths
Stripe has become the de facto choice for Canadian startups building on Shopify, custom React storefronts, or subscription models. Its API-first design, documentation quality, and ecosystem (Billing, Radar fraud tools, Terminal) make it attractive for technical teams.
For Shopify merchants, Stripe powers Shopify Payments in many regions - reducing friction at onboarding. Founders running headless commerce or multi-product SaaS often prefer Stripe's granular webhooks and reconciliation exports.
Weaknesses
When to choose Stripe: You want one stack for online + subscriptions + future POS, and your team can manage webhooks, dispute evidence, and payout reconciliation.
Strengths
PayPal's brand still converts skeptics. For Canadian SMBs selling to US and international buyers, the PayPal button can lift checkout completion - especially among customers who do not want to re-enter card details on a new storefront.
Setup is fast. PayPal Commerce Platform supports marketplaces and seller onboarding. For founders validating product-market fit, PayPal remains a credible "week one" option.
Weaknesses
When to choose PayPal: You need recognizable trust signals immediately, sell cross-border to wallet-preferring buyers, or run a marketplace model where seller payouts matter.
Strengths
Adyen is built for operators who sell online, in-store, and across markets from one platform. Interchange-plus pricing can win at volume. Unified reporting across channels appeals to retail brands expanding from DTC into physical retail.
For Canadian companies with global ambitions - particularly those already processing millions monthly - Adyen's single-stack narrative reduces vendor fragmentation.
Weaknesses
When to choose Adyen: You are processing significant volume across channels, need global acquiring in one contract, and have finance ops to manage interchange-based pricing.
Currency conversion
Charging in CAD but paying suppliers in USD? Conversion spreads matter. PayPal and Stripe both apply FX margins on top of base rates. At scale, a 0.5% FX difference is material.
Failed payments and involuntary churn
Subscription businesses lose 20–40% of churn to failed card charges (expired cards, insufficient funds, bank soft declines). Stripe Billing and Adyen offer retry logic; PayPal's subscription tooling is less sophisticated. Each failed renewal can become a support ticket if dunning emails are weak.
3D Secure and authentication friction
Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) and 3DS reduce fraud but increase checkout abandonment when implemented poorly. European shoppers and Canadian issuers increasingly challenge transactions. Misconfigured 3DS flows generate "payment failed" emails that flood support - even when the customer did nothing wrong.
Chargebacks and dispute fees
A chargeback costs more than the transaction fee: you lose the sale, pay a dispute fee, and spend ops time assembling evidence. Gateway dispute portals vary widely in usability. Founders who ignore dispute win rates leak margin quietly.
Refund processing timelines
Refund speed affects customer sentiment. PayPal and Stripe timelines differ by funding source. Slow refunds drive "where is my money?" tickets - a support cost rarely modeled in gateway spreadsheets.
Founders often evaluate gateways in finance silos. Operations teams live with the consequences.
Common payment-driven support scenarios:
| Issue | Customer behavior | Ops impact |
| 3DS failure at checkout | Abandons cart or retries multiple times | Lost revenue + confused emails |
| Duplicate charge appearance | Contacts support immediately | Refund or investigation |
| Address / AVS mismatch | Order held, customer anxious | Manual review queue |
| Subscription renewal fail | "Why was I cancelled?" | Retention risk |
| Cross-border decline | Assumes fraud, posts on social | Brand damage |
Automating post-purchase support (order status, refund policy, payment retry guidance) reduces ticket volume - but the root cause is often gateway configuration, not customer irrationality.
Smart founders pair payment stack decisions with support automation strategy. Fix checkout friction first; automate repetitive WISMO and refund questions second.
Choose Stripe if:
Choose PayPal if:
Choose Adyen if:
Run both Stripe + PayPal if:
Many Canadian SMBs start with Shopify Payments (Stripe) and add PayPal Express for international conversion - then revisit at $1M+ ARR when fee optimization and unified reporting justify complexity.
Canadian founders should stay aware of evolving payment oversight:
NCFA's ecosystem regularly covers payments regulation, embedded finance, and fintech policy - worth monitoring as your volume grows and compliance surface area expands.
Where to Invest After You Choose a Gateway
Payment selection is step one. These investments compound ROI:
For most Canadian e-commerce founders in 2026, Stripe remains the strongest default for growth-stage DTC and SaaS - especially on Shopify. PayPal earns its place when wallet trust and cross-border conversion justify the fees. Adyen makes sense when unified commerce and global volume are already realities, not aspirations.
The right gateway is not the one with the lowest advertised rate. It is the one that maximizes successful transactions, minimizes dispute drag, and keeps your support team focused on problems that actually require judgment.
Model the full cost - FX, chargebacks, failed renewals, and tickets - before you scale ad spend. Your payment stack is a fintech decision with P&L consequences long after checkout.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |