Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Mar 30, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets

On Mar 26, 2026, Bill C-25 was introduced to amend the Canada Elections Act (download 45 page Bill C-25 PDF). The bill blocks third parties from accepting contributions made in cryptoassets, prepaid payment products, or money orders for partisan activity, election advertising, or surveys. If received, those funds must be returned, destroyed, or converted and handed to the Receiver General.
Anonymous contributions are prohibited. Foreign sourced funds, property, and services are prohibited. Regulated expenses must be funded by Canadian individuals, with a limited exception allowing a third party to use its own funds only when prior year contributions are 10% or less of revenue. Disclosure also tightens. Once a contributor exceeds $200, reporting must include name, address, amount, and timing.
In practice, this closes most of the remaining paths for political money that cannot be clearly attributed.
The bill does not regulate crypto markets. It removes funding methods that make source of funds and identity harder to verify. Crypto sits alongside instruments that break clean audit trails.
This is consistent with how Canadian regulators already handle higher risk flows. When identity or intent cannot be confirmed, access gets restricted. That same pressure showed up in rules applied to donation crowdfunding platforms and in guidance on bitcoin ATMs, where operators are expected to treat even smaller transactions within a broader AML framework.
Political finance applies that standard without exception.
This is a political funding rule, and doesn't apply to general payments or everyday crypto use.
It does show how regulators act when attribution cannot be optional. Funding must be tied to identifiable sources, supported by records, and capable of audit.
Failures to meet that bar already carry real consequences. Major AML breakdowns at large institutions and advances in detection, including AI driven money laundering techniques and shell company structures, show how quickly expectations are rising.
Bill C-25 is focused on political funding. Money used in elections must be attributable, traceable, and tied to identifiable Canadian sources. Fintech and financial institutions dealing with Canadian election flows must be able to prove who sent the money, where it came from, and how it moved, otherwise they'll soon be under pressure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 30, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Regulation And Policy

On Mar 26, 2026, Bill C-15 received Royal Assent. The law completes Canada’s consumer-driven banking legislative framework and creates a regulated space for stablecoins. The Department of Finance confirms that directly. The Bank of Canada also confirms it will take on two new mandates, including the supervision of stablecoin issuers and oversight of the framework for consumer-driven banking.
The real change isn't that Canada suddenly discovered digital finance, but rather that political will has now cleared the legislative hurdle.
Canada now has a clearer institutional map for three linked parts of digital finance: payment service providers, stablecoins, and consumer-directed data sharing. Payment supervision was recently already in place under the Retail Payment Activities Act.
That reduces one kind of uncertainty. Companies no longer need to guess whether Canada intends to regulate these areas. The answer is yes. The remaining uncertainty is operational, so how the rules will work, how supervision will be applied, how fast the framework will be implemented, and whether the final design is practical enough for real products and real users.
The law is in force, but the working rulebook is still being built. The Bank of Canada will help develop regulations, supervisory policies, and operational frameworks, while engaging industry as the system moves toward implementation.
The core stablecoin model is already visible. Issuers are expected to operate with 1:1 reserves in high quality liquid assets, support at par redemption, and meet ongoing supervisory and disclosure expectations. The remaining uncertainty is how these requirements translate into daily compliance, reporting, and supervision.
Consumer-driven banking is going forward under a split structure where the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada handles accreditation, participant oversight, and consumer protection, while the Bank of Canada sets and oversees the technical standards that systems will need to meet. The direction is clear, but execution depends on how these layers work together. Companies will need to meet accreditation requirements while building to technical standards at the same time. The risk is not uncertainty about the framework, but having to clear more than one gate before a product can go live.
Lastly, the execution risk is how quickly outstanding detailed rules take to arrive, and how difficult they are to meet in practice. If those answers come slowly, Canada will have a legal framework but real momentum will take a hit. If they come quickly and cleanly, related Canadian fintech models will become easier to build, partner, and price.
Good for competition and investment. Clearer rules helps more than vague ambition does. Foreign firms, infrastructure providers, and capital partners can assess Canada more easily when they can see which activities are in scope, who supervises them, and what the implementation path looks like. That alone doesn't guarantee a wave of new investment. Market size, compliance cost, tax treatment, and speed of execution still matter. But a clear regulatory perimeter is better than a half-built one.
For fintechs, the upside is clarity. The cost is higher discipline. Stablecoin and consumer-data products will need stronger controls, cleaner records, and more formal partner arrangements earlier in the build process. This helps firms that already build for regulated environments. It slows firms that rely on loose structures or hope to sort out compliance later. The gap between policy design and real payment usage is already visible in stablecoin data showing a payments reality gap, where payment use still lags trading and treasury activity.
For banks and larger financial institutions, the law creates a more defined path to engage with stablecoins and consumer-driven banking under a supervised framework. That helps internal decision-making. It also raises responsibility. Institutions will need stronger oversight of how these products connect to payments, treasury, customer channels, and third-party infrastructure.
For infrastructure and vendor firms, this raises the standard for what counts as a viable solution. Auditability, resilience, data controls, and supervisory readiness become buying criteria, not optional features. Vendors that cannot support regulated deployment will struggle to win larger Canadian mandates.
For Canada’s financial services landscape, the likely effect is a clearer split between firms that can operate under supervision and firms that cannot. That may improve trust and reduce noise. It will also be an advantage for participants that already have stronger governance, legal support, and operational depth.
The priority is to prepare, not wait. Companies should identify where payment stablecoins and consumer-directed data already sit in their products, map the third parties those flows depend on, and test whether those setups can meet supervision. The detailed rules are still coming, but teams that engage early will understand the direction sooner and adjust faster.
For years, progress in stablecoins and consumer-driven banking depended on political will. Bill C-15 clears that hurdle. The framework is now in law.
Canadian digital finance is now onto execution. Regulations, supervisory expectations, and operating standards will decide whether firms can build and scale in Canada without delay. Bill C-15 sets the direction. Execution will decide how much actually gets built.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
March 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Regulation And Policy, Payments And Market Infrastructure, Risk Compliance And Regtech

Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026, March 14-20, 2026).
The RBA is moving past short pilots. The focus now is how tokenised money works with existing settlement systems and what holds up under real use.
The SEC is narrowing one regulator facing CAT access path in the name of cost savings while keeping other query methods in place. That doesn't change trading rules, but it can change how efficiently regulators search market activity and build surveillance cases, and to that extent there are some concerns around reduced oversight.
Fully paid lending goes from exemption based programs to a standard rule set. Dealers need to update inventory funding structures and controls before the effective date.
Tokenization is now being discussed inside the core U.S. capital markets policy process, with major market infrastructure and exchange voices at the table. That raises the odds that tokenized securities will be treated as a market structure question tied to trading, clearing, settlement, and custody, not only as a digital asset issue.
Lynn Martin, President, NYSE Group: “As we explore how tokenization can enhance capital markets, it is critical that new infrastructure is developed in a way that preserves the trust, transparency, and protections investors expect. Securitize brings deep experience in digital asset infrastructure and transfer agency, making them a strong partner in helping design this next generation of market structure.”
India is moving from payment expansion to payment control. Fraud liability, cyber resilience, cross border authorisation, and switching now sit closer to the centre of the next build cycle for banks, payment firms, and fintech infrastructure providers.
Visa is getting into the infrastructure layer. Privacy has been one of the main blockers for banks and large financial institutions using shared blockchain systems. If that barrier starts to fall, onchain payments, settlement, and treasury activity can move closer to core financial market infrastructure.
FMI oversight expectations set the operating floor for payments and clearing infrastructure, which can flow through to participant requirements, vendor controls, and resilience planning.
This brings tokenized cash into live institutional money movement. It's a major Canadian bank using tokenized cash to support real margin, collateral, and settlement flows on a continuous basis. Tokenized money is moving deeper into market infrastructure and gives regulated institutions a way to move value when markets need it 24/7, not only during banking hours.
Deloitte and Stablecorp are building integration paths for financial institutions to use QCAD inside existing systems. The work targets clearing, treasury, and cross-border flows, but no deployments or pilots have been confirmed yet. Treat this as a signal that stablecoin infrastructure is being wired into bank workflows ahead of regulatory clarity.
This closes a multi phase refresh and sets a new baseline for dealer compliance interpretation across UMIR topics, which can flow into policy mapping, training, and vendor rule logic.
Bill C-15 puts stablecoins, payments, and consumer-driven banking under a more unified central bank structure. Firms now need to plan for supervision across digital money and data-sharing models, not treat them as separate tracks.
Event contracts are now included in a defined Canadian dealer framework. Firms need to clear product design, compliance, and notification before going live.
AI assisted authorisations and automated reporting feeds can shorten approval timelines and change how supervision picks up issues from live data.
Sarah Pritchard, Deputy Chief Executive, Financial Conduct Authority: “We want to see more people getting supported, who aren’t currently, and a market that innovates and offers tailored services to meet differing consumer needs.”
Dealers and fintech vendors that support eDiscovery, recordkeeping, surveillance, and investigation response workflows now have a clear CIRO baseline for data handling, metadata preservation, and production process design.
Courts are beginning to test whether engagement led product design itself can create liability at scale. If that theory survives, the impact reaches beyond social media. Any digital product that depends on compulsive use patterns, especially where minors or vulnerable users are involved, faces legal scrutiny and compliance costs.
August 6 update: A New Mexico court ordered Meta to establish a US$567M abatement fund, bringing the financial remedies in the case to US$942M, and imposed youth-safety requirements covering age assurance, teen usage and notifications, adult-minor contact controls and AI-chatbot interactions involving minors. Meta plans to appeal.
As more execution flows move through automated and intermediated channels, CIRO is making it clearer who is responsible, how orders must be marked, and what supervision has to look like. That raises the operating standard for dealers, trading desks, legal and compliance teams, and firms providing marketplace access. Electronic access remains open, but responsibility for supervision, order marking, and control cannot blur as more parties exist between the client and the marketplace.
This raises the risk that sports prediction markets face a direct statutory limit before the category settles into a stable regulatory path. Congress is now testing whether these contracts belong inside federal market infrastructure or back inside state gambling rules. Important for exchanges, prediction market operators, legal teams, and investors betting on event contracts as a durable product category.
This series puts AI governance in focus for banks and fintechs, especially around model risk, cybersecurity controls, and how supervisors assess AI driven decisioning inside core workflows.
China is using tax data, regulated data sharing, and specific technologies to push more SME credit through banks. That is a lending infrastructure signal, not just a blockchain headline.
Regulators are setting clearer boundaries, and infrastructure is moving into production at the same time. That combination raises the cost of getting it wrong and shortens the window to get it right. Teams need working controls, real vendor oversight, and systems that hold up under load before scaling anything customer facing. NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
March 20, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Payments And Market Infrastructure

Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026).
This adds a new regulated counterparty node for banks, payment partners, and fintech vendors that use CIRO membership as a gating factor for onboarding, integrations, and supervised operating scope.
This puts fund distribution onchain with rules built into the asset. Transfers can enforce who can hold and trade without separate manual checks. That changes how funds issue, manage investors, and handle transfers. It points to tokenized fund infrastructure moving into live use, not pilots.
This affects crypto trading platforms, market makers, treasury teams, and regulators watching stablecoin market structure in Canada. Lower margin on eligible inventory can improve capital efficiency and balance sheet use, but only inside a tighter control framework. It means regulated treatment of stablecoins is moving deeper into prudential design, not just disclosure and registration.
A core global index now trades outside exchange hours. Price formation can start on crypto venues before futures markets reopen, which puts pressure on where liquidity shows up first. If activity builds on chain, traditional venues risk reacting instead of leading. For brokerages, exchanges, and market infrastructure providers, this is not theoretical. Firms need to decide whether to support 24/7 access, how to manage risk when markets never close, and how to compete with venues that remove time and geographic limits.
Crypto issuers, exchanges, custodians, brokers, investors, and token builders now have a clearer US reference point for token design, disclosures, and jurisdiction planning. The practical implication is significant. Firms exposed to staking, airdrops, wrapped assets, stablecoins, or token distribution models can reassess compliance, product structure, and market access strategy with more precision across SEC and CFTC lines.
This is for banks, lenders, treasury teams, and fintechs that rely on bank balance sheets and bank distribution. Capital rules affect lending capacity, pricing, and risk appetite. A lighter or more targeted framework can change how banks allocate capital and where they are willing to compete.
Banks facing margin pressure, conduct costs, and weak returns are under more pressure to lower their operating base faster. The practical implication for lenders, fintechs, and banking vendors is that AI and automation are moving from pilot projects into cost and staffing decisions. Firms that can automate servicing, operations, and control workflows without weakening customer outcomes or compliance will be in a stronger position.
This gives UK facing fintechs and suppliers a cleaner map of where supervisors focus and where firms should spend compliance and product time. Payments, retail banking, consumer finance, and wholesale market firms can now align internal control roadmaps to sector specific priorities instead of broad portfolio letters, which tightens how boards and senior managers justify investment decisions.
Federal procurement remains difficult for new entrants to access, with complexity and restrictive design favouring repeat suppliers. At the same time, the report outlines clear changes that could open participation, improve competition, and expand access for fintech, govtech, and smaller vendors seeking to sell into government.
China is widening the distribution base for state digital money inside the banking system. Analysts see the bigger role in cross-border settlement and in building a payments channel that's outside dollar-based infrastructure such as SWIFT. China is pushing public digital money deeper into bank distribution while closing space for private stablecoin models.
This expands direct access for credit unions that want to build or buy modern payment capabilities. Credit unions, processors, and fintech partners can now plan for real system participation, not just eligibility on paper.
This is for banks, cross-border payment firms, remittance providers, treasury teams, and stablecoin infrastructure players. Stablecoin payouts are moving closer to standard bank payment flows instead of sitting outside them as a separate integration project. That lowers friction for bank adoption and puts more pressure on legacy cross-border payout models.
Mastercard is building direct control over how funds move between bank accounts and stablecoin systems. That changes routing, pricing, and who captures value in cross border and treasury flows. For fintechs, payment products will increasingly need to support both fiat and digital settlement paths in the same workflow. For banks, this puts more pressure on correspondent banking and other legacy cross border revenue lines.
This changes how investor harm connects to enforcement outcomes. Dealers, registrants, and their vendors now need tighter client records and cleaner evidence trails because the process depends on what harmed investors can prove and what firms can produce quickly and accurately when claims arrive.
This lowers reporting cost and workload for smaller public companies. It changes how often new financial data enters the market. Investors and data platforms will have less frequent updates. For issuers, this improves the economics of staying public. If adopted more widely, it moves Canada toward a lighter reporting model for venture markets.
Industry participants are pushing to remove limits that keep tokenized market infrastructure in pilot mode. That pressure targets how quickly the EU can move from controlled testing toward scalable digital asset markets.
Tokenized securities into the core of exchange trading. They will trade the same way as regular shares, on the same book, with the same symbol and rules. No separate venue, no parallel system. It removes a major barrier with tokenization now aligned with the same clearing, settlement, and surveillance systems as the rest of the market.
A forward flow commitment supports predictable loan takeout capacity, which can stabilize origination volume when bank balance sheets tighten or pricing changes.
Public companies, investors, analysts, and fintech platforms that rely on earnings data will face longer gaps between official disclosures. Less frequent reporting reduces the flow of standardized financial data into the market. Firms that can generate alternative data, continuous signals, and independent performance insight will have an advantage as reliance on scheduled earnings reports declines.
When one of India's largest fintech payments company pauses an IPO, it tells founders, investors, and late stage boards that the public market window remains fragile. That affects valuation expectations, liquidity planning, and timing for other fintech listings.
NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 18, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Digital Assets And Tokenization

On Mar 17, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a formal interpretation on how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets and certain crypto asset transactions with aligned support from the CFTC read the SEC’s March 17 press release on the joint crypto interpretation (and Fact Sheet).
This is a significant U.S. digital asset policy interpretation because it gives the market something it's lacked for a long time: a public classification system, a public lifecycle test, and public treatment of core activities such as staking, wrapping, and airdrops.
The old question of 'is it a security?' no longer sits only at the token level.
The SEC now says the answer can depend on the category of asset, the way it is sold, the promises around it, and whether those promises still matter later in the market.
The release classifies crypto assets into five categories based on characteristics, uses, and functions: (1) digital commodities, (2) digital collectibles, (3) digital tools, (4) stablecoins, and (5) digital securities. It's a framework that crypto firms can actually use in product design, listing review, and compliance planning.
Some of the examples are worth noting. In the published interpretation, the SEC lists Aptos, Avalanche, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Cardano, Chainlink, Dogecoin, Ether, Hedera, Litecoin, Polkadot, Shiba Inu, Solana, Stellar, Tezos, and XRP as examples of digital commodities. It says these assets gain value from how the network operates and from market supply and demand, not from a team whose efforts drive profit expectations.
On collectibles, it points to CryptoPunks, Chromie Squiggles, Fan Tokens, WIF, and VCOIN.
On tools, it cites Ethereum Name Service domain names and CoinDesk’s Microcosms NFT Consensus Ticket.
The point is not that every asset that looks similar gets a free pass, and the SEC is now saying publicly that many crypto assets are not securities in themselves.
The SEC separates the token from how it is sold. It applies the Howey test to the transaction, not just the asset. A token that is not a security can still be sold as part of an investment contract if a team’s promises create an expectation of profit.
The interpretation then separates the asset from the contract and explains how that link can end. A non security token is no longer subject to an investment contract once buyers no longer rely on the issuer’s promises.
This can happen in two ways. The issuer fulfills what it said it would build, such as delivering functionality or completing roadmap milestones. Or the issuer abandons those efforts, making it unreasonable for the market to keep relying on them. In both cases, the investment contract can fall away, even though the issuer may still face anti fraud liability for earlier statements.
This directly addresses the secondary market problem. A token’s status in later trading does not depend only on how it was launched. It also depends on whether buyers still rely on the issuer’s promises at that point in time.
The SEC ties securities treatment directly to what issuers say. Statements in agreements, websites, whitepapers, and social media can create a reasonable expectation of profit.
That risk increases when issuers make explicit promises tied to roadmaps, milestones, funding plans, and how their work will drive value.
Token design and marketing cannot be separated. If the sales narrative links price appreciation to team execution, the offering can be treated as an investment contract.
For founders and counsel, that is the message. Product design, legal design, and communications design now need to be built together from day one.
The SEC says covered protocol staking activities don't involve securities transactions when structured as described. It covers self staking, custodial and non custodial staking, delegated and nominated staking, and liquid staking.
The interpretation is that rewards and penalties come from protocol rules, not from a team managing profits. That includes liquid staking models where users receive tokens tied to their staked position. If returns come from how the network operates, not from a promoter’s decisions, the activity is less likely to be treated as a securities transaction. That gives exchanges, custodians, and staking providers clearer ground for product design.
The SEC also says wrapping a non security crypto asset doesn't create a security when the wrapped token is redeemable one for one, the underlying asset stays locked for the holder, and value comes from that underlying asset. This supports cross chain use, custody design, and token mobility.
It also confirms that certain airdrops do not involve an investment of money under the Howey Test when recipients do not give anything in return. Common uses include rewarding early users, supporting governance, and building network participation. This does not make all airdrops safe, but it gives builders a clearer framework to separate distribution from securities risk.
The SEC aligns its position on stablecoins with the GENIUS Act. It says qualifying payment stablecoins issued by permitted issuers will not be securities once the law is in force. It also states that some covered stablecoins already fall outside securities treatment under its interpretation. This gives issuers and institutions clearer direction on how stablecoins are treated at the federal level.
Tokenized securities get a clear boundary. A security remains a security whether it is issued offchain or onchain. The SEC describes both issuer led tokenization and third party tokenization of existing assets. In both cases, moving an asset onchain may improve issuance and settlement, but it does not change its legal status.
This interpretation affects different parts of the market in different ways.
This interpretation shows what a more usable framework looks like in practice. While it doesn't solve every unanswered question, it's helpful and moves the debate from slogans to structure. Markets develop faster when participants can classify assets, model lifecycle risk, and design products in lie with public rules instead of trying to read the regulator’s mind from old enforcement cases.
The SEC doesn't replace the Howey Test but it makes Howey more operational for crypto markets. That's the real change. The release gives the industry a public map for classification, a public test for when securities treatment begins and ends, and public treatment of activities that sit at the center of token network design. If you're looking for more of a legal analysis here.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 17, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Banking Regulation And Digital Assets

The debate is heating up over crypto and fintech access to US banking infrastructure since actions already taken by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) on Dec 12 2025 to conditionally approve five national trust bank charters for the following crypto firms: First National Digital Currency Bank, Ripple National Trust Bank, BitGo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos Trust Company. These charters allow firms to operate under federal oversight for custody and payments without taking deposits.
On Mar 17 2026, the Wall Street Journal reported that regulators are considering expanded crypto bank access, points to further expansion along this path rather than a new standalone rule. The direction is reinforced by guidance such as the OCC bulletin on digital asset and stablecoin activities, which shows regulators are already defining how non traditional firms operate within the federal banking perimeter.
It's significant because national trust charters give firms a way to scale across the US without relying on fragmented state licensing. They provide a regulated path into custody, payments, and fiduciary services under a single federal supervisor, without becoming full service deposit taking banks.
Traditional banking groups are pushing back. In a statement opposing OCC conditional approval of five national trust bank charters, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) said the decision left “substantial unanswered questions” about how these firms would operate and be supervised. BPI has also filed specific objections to trust charter applications, including its opposition to Connectia Trust’s national trust bank application and its opposition to BitGo Trust’s conversion to a national trust bank.
The concern is regulatory parity. Banks argue that if crypto and fintech firms can access core custody and payments infrastructure through trust charters without taking deposits, they may gain entry to important parts of the banking system without facing the same balance sheet requirements as full service banks. That tension is at the center of the policy debate. Who gets access to regulated infrastructure, and under what conditions.
The US isn't waiting for a new trust charter rule. It's progressing through approvals, guidance, and case by case decisions that give some firms a clearer path into regulated custody, payments, and fiduciary services under federal oversight.
A national trust charter can reduce dependence on fragmented state licensing, improve credibility with institutional partners, and make it easier to build around regulated payment and custody infrastructure. But know that the regulatory bar isn't low. Firms pursuing this path still need strong governance, compliance, risk controls, and operating discipline. Access is possible, but it is conditional.
Canada is taking a different approach. In the US, the trust charter debate is about whether crypto and fintech firms can enter deeper into the banking system through a federal charter pathway. In Canada, the main stablecoin related framework sits inside securities and crypto trading platform oversight, not bank chartering. Canadian regulators use the term value referenced crypto assets (see CSA Staff Notice 21 333) and sets conditions around reserves, disclosure, redemption rights, assurance, and platform controls before these assets can be offered to clients. That means the US debate is mainly about institutional status and access to banking infrastructure, while the Canadian debate is mainly about asset eligibility and client protection on regulated platforms.
In Feb 2026, OSFI announced a targeted fast track approval framework for new entrants that will launch in June 2026 and give eligible applicants a quicker, clearer, and more predictable path into the federal system. The initial scope includes provincial credit unions seeking federal status and firms with technologically innovative or emerging banking models.
The real question is not whether crypto firms become banks. It is whether regulators create a consistent operating standard for firms that want access to core financial infrastructure without becoming full service deposit taking institutions.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
March 13, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Open Banking Open Finance And Data Sharing, Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy

Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026).
Regulators are aligning competition rules and data protection in a way that directly affects how AI systems access, process, and govern data. For fintechs and financial institutions building on platform infrastructure, data strategy, consent design, and compliance architecture are becoming tightly coupled decisions.
Large platforms, AI firms, fintechs, and financial institutions that depend on platform distribution, data access, identity layers, or app infrastructure face a more active compliance environment. Platform terms, profiling practices, interoperability rules, and access conditions can change through ongoing regulatory review. Firms with high dependency on a small number of gatekeepers face increased operating risk, while firms that diversify distribution, strengthen direct customer relationships, and build adaptable data and compliance architectures will be better positioned.
The next edge will come from firms that can operationalize data standards, identity rails, and compliance workflows across jurisdictions rather than wait for policy intent alone to close the gap.
This deal says scale in cross border payments is moving toward platforms that already combine distribution, compliance support, and endpoint reach. For smaller wallet, remittance, and banking partners, the harder question is no longer whether they can connect. It is whether they still control enough of the customer relationship or economics once a larger stack sits in the middle.
This brings Ripple inside the licensed payments system in Australia. It can handle more of the payment flow itself instead of relying on partners. That includes onboarding, compliance, FX, and payout. For banks and fintechs, this means a digital asset firm can now compete more directly on cross border payments with full regulatory coverage, not just as a crypto overlay.
This impacts payment processors, merchant platforms, and consumer fintechs that want to own checkout and settlement. A payment aggregator license pulls merchant onboarding, refunds, and settlement into one accountable layer, so competitors and partners should expect tighter expectations on merchant screening and operational controls as volumes grow.
This impacts fixed income platforms, treasury and collateral systems, and anyone building workflows that touch Government of Canada collateral. Dealer funding and hedging capacity affects liquidity and trading costs.
This impacts capital markets fintechs that want distribution through regulated channels. When a top tier exchange brand commits to a tokenization partner, procurement and diligence tighten fast. Builders should prepare for deeper questions on governance, surveillance, custody controls, and how tokenized assets move without breaking compliance reporting and investor protections.
This raises the execution standard for digital onboarding, disclosures, promotions, and support flows. For fintechs, good UX is no longer enough on its own. Firms need evidence that customers understand what they are seeing and can act on it without avoidable confusion.
Ottawa is pushing affordability through multiple channels at once, including taxes, housing, and core banking fees. For banks, that puts more pressure on legacy fee revenue and raises the importance of better alerts, cash flow tools, and low cost account design. For fintechs, it strengthens the case for products that help users avoid failed payments, manage short term liquidity, and lower everyday banking friction.
Banks lose part of a high margin penalty fee and face more pressure to compete on better alerts, balance visibility, payment controls, and products that help customers avoid failed payments in the first place. Direct product and revenue implications across consumer banking.
This opens a formal rulemaking lane around one of the fastest growing grey areas in digital markets. It matters for exchanges, brokers, market makers, and fintech platforms. How far regulated market structure will let them scale before they run into tighter product boundaries.
This guidance impacts how Canadian DIY investment platforms can design tools and user experiences. Online brokers and fintech wealth platforms now have clearer room to provide decision support, portfolio models, and guided interfaces, but they must build stronger safeguards to ensure those tools do not cross the line into regulated investment advice (a condition of the OEO regulatory exemption).
Public payment rails can widen access, but they can also compress private platform economics and add pressure onto merchant pricing. For banks, fintechs, and payment providers, the real issue is not only whether public rails expand. It is how pricing design changes volume, margin, and who absorbs the cost.
A charter application signals a potential change in funding and balance sheet strategy for an AI lending platform and it can reshape partner economics for banks and credit unions that currently fund originations.
This is more than a weak quarter. It puts credit quality, funding resilience, and covenant headroom back at the center of the non prime lending story, which matters for alt lenders, securitization partners, credit investors, and fintechs selling underwriting, servicing, collections, and portfolio monitoring tools into the consumer lending stack.
This matters for brokers, carriers, and digital asset clients because premium payments are a treasury workflow. Once stablecoins clear premiums across real counterparties, buyers and carriers will ask harder questions about controls, reconciliation, and how funds move from premium collection to coverage without losing traceability.
This roadmap puts Europe closer to a tokenised market structure built around central bank money rather than private settlement workarounds. It matters for banks, FMIs, tokenisation platforms, and securities infrastructure teams because the market is now moving from exploratory work toward live design choices on standards, networks, and governance.
This opens a cleaner path for brokers and institutional desks that want crypto execution without rebuilding their stack around proprietary APIs. Once crypto routing uses the same FIX plumbing as other asset classes, firms will put more weight on consistent controls, audit trails, and operational readiness across both traditional and digital venues.
Payment networks are scaling distribution and wallet reach. Tokenized market structure is moving closer to institutional use. Canada’s NSF fee cap also cuts into a legacy bank revenue line and raises the value of tools that help customers avoid failed payments. The strongest fintechs and financial institutions are combining regulatory discipline, strong rails, and practical financial workflows that reduce friction for users.
NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
August 26th, 2025
January 4th, 2024
June 1st, 2021
September 9th, 2020
July 9th, 2018
January 3rd, 2018
September 25th, 2017
June 20th, 2017
May 10th, 2017
December 14th, 2016

NCFA Canada
Craig Asano
CEO and Executive Director
casano@ncfacanada.org
ncfacanada.org




