Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
May 28, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Intelligence Question | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy

Last Updated: May 28, 2026
Status: Building
Organizations: SoFi, Department of Finance Canada, Bank of Canada, FCA, UK Government
The answer is yes, but not because stablecoins are leaving crypto behind. They are expanding from crypto market use into banking apps, remittances, reserve models, and payment policy. The test is no longer whether tokens can move on chain. The test is whether they can move money inside regulated financial systems.
The link to payment access is important. Stablecoins need banking partners, reserves, payment gateways, custody controls, and settlement routes. That connects directly to limited direct settlement access, because stablecoin utility depends on how close non bank firms can get to trusted payment and reserve infrastructure.
The firms to watch are the ones that can make stablecoins boring enough to use. That means clean reserves, clear redemption, strong compliance, distribution reach, and payment flows that solve real problems.
Strategic Takeaway
Stablecoins are expanding into payment infrastructure where they connect trusted reserves, regulated distribution, and real money movement. The strongest players may be firms that can make tokenized money useful without making users think about crypto at all.
Click each item to expand
SoFiUSD shows stablecoins moving into mainstream financial distribution. The product is positioned as a bank issued, 1:1 redeemable U.S. dollar stablecoin inside the SoFi app.
Canada’s framework gives the stablecoin infrastructure question a domestic policy base. It moves stablecoin activity toward rules for issuance, reserves, custody, redemption, governance, and oversight.
UK policy work shows regulators treating stablecoins as potential payment instruments, not only crypto assets. That means issuance, custody, reserves, and payment services are becoming connected policy questions.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 27, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Intelligence Question | Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

Last Updated: May 27, 2026
Status: Building
Organizations: Federal Reserve, Neo, Interac, Tether, Government of Georgia
The answer is moving toward yes, but through tighter gates. Regulators are not opening settlement systems to every fintech. They are testing whether some firms can reach parts of the settlement layer without becoming banks.
Canada already allows some narrower access models through Interac participation and registered payment frameworks. The next pressure point may come from real time payments, stablecoin reserve treatment, tokenized settlement, or cross border payment competition from outside Canada.
The firms to watch are not necessarily the biggest fintechs. The advantage may go to companies that can prove resilience, compliance depth, operational uptime, fraud controls, and trusted movement of funds at scale. Regulators appear more willing to test narrower infrastructure access when the activity is tightly defined and operationally mature.
Strategic Takeaway
Limited direct settlement access is becoming a middle layer between sponsor bank dependence and full banking status. That could reshape who controls payment flow, customer relationships, settlement logic, and financial infrastructure over the next few years.
Click each item to expand
The Fed proposal separates limited payment access from full banking status. It gives regulators a way to test settlement and reserve functions without granting the full benefits of a Master Account.
Neo’s Interac access gives the Canadian market a practical proof point. Direct rail participation can improve control over payment flow without turning a fintech into a full bank.
The Georgia stablecoin plan shows why this question is moving beyond traditional payment rails. Stablecoins can connect payments, remittances, programmable finance, and national digital infrastructure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 26, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Payments And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

The Fed is proposing limited settlement accounts for eligible firms. The bigger question is whether the U.S. gives qualified fintechs a cleaner infrastructure advantage than Canada.
On May 26, 2026, the Federal Reserve published a Federal Register proposal for special purpose Payment Accounts. Legally eligible institutions could use them to clear and settle certain payment activity through Reserve Bank accounts. Comments are due by July 27, 2026 under Docket No. OP-1878.
The proposal isn't open access to the Fed. Payment Accounts would have no intraday credit, no discount window access, no interest on balances, no correspondent activity, and no respondent activity. Closing balances would generally be capped at $1B. The account would support approved payment settlement, not full banking privileges.
Jerome H. Powell, Fed Chair said:
“The proposed payment account would be tailored to support innovation by serving the clearing and settlement needs of certain eligible institutions while also mitigating material risks to the Reserve Banks and payment system.”
A Master Account gives an eligible institution direct access to Reserve Bank balances and Federal Reserve payment services. The proposed Payment Account is narrower in scope. Firms would not borrow from the Fed, earn interest, receive daylight overdrafts, or use the account as a correspondent banking platform.
The Fed is testing whether limited settlement access can exist without full banking access.
Fintechs, crypto firms, trust companies, and novel chartered institutions have pushed for Fed access because sponsor bank dependence affects cost, timing, liquidity, and settlement certainty. Banks have pushed back because wide access can raise compliance, liquidity, and regulatory arbitrage concerns.
In 2022, the Fed finalized Account Access Guidelines with a tiered review framework. The toughest review applies to institutions that are not federally insured and are not subject to federal prudential supervision at the institution or holding company level.
The 2026 proposal doesn't replace that framework. It creates a tighter account model inside the same access debate.
The proposal discusses use cases raised by commenters, including stablecoin issuer reserve operations, tokenized securities settlement in central bank money, tokenized assets, pay by bank checkout, B2B transfers, instant wages and refunds, and the U.S. dollar leg of cross border transactions.
Those use cases point to the same operating need, clean settlement. Stablecoin issuers need reliable reserve movement. Tokenization platforms need cash settlement closer to central bank money. PSPs need faster payment settlement. Pay by bank providers need lower cost routing. Cross border firms need cleaner dollar leg execution.
Today, many fintechs settle payments through sponsor banks. A fintech sends payment instructions, but the actual settlement usually happens through a commercial bank account connected to central bank rails.
Under the Fed proposal, an approved firm could potentially hold limited settlement balances directly at a Reserve Bank for approved payment activity. That could reduce some dependence on sponsor banks for specific flows.
For a stablecoin issuer, that could improve reserve movement and redemption settlement.
For a pay by bank provider, it could streamline payment routing.
For a tokenization platform, it could support settlement closer to central bank money instead of relying entirely on commercial bank ledger movement.
The proposal would not turn fintechs into banks. Firms would not receive deposit insurance, emergency liquidity, or unrestricted Fed access.
If eligible U.S. firms gain limited Reserve Bank settlement access while Canadian firms remain more dependent on bank intermediaries, U.S. fintechs could gain an operating edge in payment speed, settlement certainty, reserve movement, and cost control.
That edge is important for stablecoins, tokenized securities, pay by bank, B2B payments, cross border transfers, and embedded finance. These markets compete on speed, liquidity use, compliance reliability, and integration cost.
It could also change sponsor bank negotiations. A firm with a credible settlement alternative has more leverage than one with no alternative.
| Question | U.S. Fed Payment Account Proposal | Canada RPAA Registered PSP | Canada Payment Rail Participation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live today? | No. Proposal only. | Yes | Yes |
| Can hold settlement balances at the central bank? | Only if final rules approve it and the firm qualifies. | No | No by participation alone. |
| Can settle some payments through a central bank account? | Would apply only to approved payment activity. | No | RTR may allow direct settlement for eligible participants that qualify for Bank of Canada settlement accounts. RPAA registration alone doesn't. |
| Still needs sponsor banks? | Yes, but dependence could fall for approved settlement flows. | Yes | Yes, in many cases. |
| Gets full banking powers? | No | No | No |
| Main benefit | Potentially cleaner settlement for stablecoins, tokenized assets, pay by bank, and cross border dollar flows. | Legal operation under Bank of Canada supervision. | Access to payment rails and network participation. |
Canada’s retail payments framework brings PSPs into Bank of Canada supervision. The PSP registry under the RPAA confirms registration status, required fees, and national security screening. Registration does not itself provide limited direct settlement access.
Payments Canada says the Real Time Rail will launch in Q4 2026 as Canada’s instant, data rich exchange and clearing and settlement payment system. RTR is expected to broaden access for eligible participants, including PSPs that meet applicable requirements.
Canada has also legislated a fiat backed stablecoin framework, with detailed rules and implementation still being developed. The framework helps define issuer obligations around reserves, redemption, governance, data security, and Bank of Canada oversight. It does not itself provide payment rail access or limited direct settlement access.
The competitive question is not whether Canada should copy the Fed. It's whether Canada can give qualified PSPs, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms a clear access ladder from supervision to rail participation to settlement. If U.S. firms gain a narrow Fed settlement lane while Canadian firms wait for comparable clarity, product speed, treasury efficiency, and sponsor bank leverage may tilt south.
If U.S. firms get limited central bank settlement access, what should Canada let supervised PSPs access once they meet higher standards?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 26, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Risk Compliance And Regtech, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Payments And Money Movement

Canada’s revoked MSB registry shows where payments, crypto, FX, and money transfer compliance risk is concentrated.
On May 21, 2026, FINTRAC modeified the public revoked money services business registry, currently showing 396 revoked registrations within the broader MSB registry of 7,745 firms. These revoked registrations span multiple years, but some quick analysis shows where payments, crypto, FX, and money transfer compliance risk is concentrated.
Below we show the total number of revoked registrations (396) by revocation year:
The registry is cumulative, but 2022 and 2026 stand out with greater numbers. The 2022 spike may reflect several factors, including delayed compliance reviews, expired or inactive registrations, pandemic era business disruption, and firms failing to respond to FINTRAC requests or update operating information.
The 2026 peak shows revocations are active again, but the registry doesn't explain why each firm was removed.
Of the 151 registrations revoked in 2026:
These activity counts exceed 151 because many businesses offered multiple services under one registration. They operated across money transfer, FX, virtual currency, PSP activity, and sometimes crowdfunding or money order services at the same time. That combination can make compliance harder because one firm may need controls for several activity types at once.
Wallets, stablecoin services, remittance platforms, crypto OTC desks, merchant payout tools, and embedded finance products often cross several regulatory categories. Companies building in these areas need clearer service mapping, stronger AML controls, and faster regulatory response processes.
By Province:
By City:
The above counts simply show where revoked registrations are concentrated in the dataset. Vancouver and Toronto are also major hubs for payments, FX, crypto services, incorporation activity, and cross border commerce, so higher counts likely reflect market density as well as supervisory attention.
MSBs must keep records, verify client identity, maintain a compliance regime, report certain financial transactions, and register their business. FINTRAC can revoke registration when a business becomes ineligible, misses a clarification request deadline, fails to respond to information demands, fails to update operating information, or fails to assist the Centre.
Founders should treat MSB registration as an active regulatory relationship. Address changes, service category changes, ownership changes, agent changes, and compliance officer changes all need disciplined tracking. Compliance teams should also review whether real business activity still matches registered categories, especially where firms blend payments, crypto, FX, remittances, PSP activity, and embedded finance.
Investors should add registry hygiene, AML staffing, virtual currency exposure, PSP activity, and regulator response history to diligence checklists. Growth can hide weak compliance operations for a while, but public registries can make those weaknesses visible.
This all aligns with recent Canadian oversight changes, such as the Bank of Canada’s PSP Registry under the RPAA, new Bank of Canada guidance for PSPs, and FINTRAC’s focus on Bitcoin ATM money laundering risks.
Which crypto firm looks stronger to regulators, investors, and banking partners: one that treats compliance as paperwork, or one that builds it into the operating system?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 22, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Payments And Money Movement

Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026, March 14-20, 2026, March 21-27, 2026, March 28-April 3, 2026, April 4-10, 2026, April 11-17, 2026, April 18-24, 2026, April 25-May 1, 2026, May 2-8, 2026, May 9-15, 2026).
Institutional digital asset infrastructure is increasingly converging around unified execution, settlement, compliance, and liquidity layers. Banks, fintechs, custodians, PSPs, brokers, and treasury teams should track how tokenized funds, stablecoin settlement, collateral movement, and onchain liquidity are becoming integrated into institutional operating environments rather than isolated crypto workflows.
Bank led stablecoins are becoming part of Europe’s regulated payment strategy. Banks, PSPs, stablecoin issuers, custodians, treasury teams, and compliance groups should track how euro denominated stablecoin infrastructure affects settlement options, liquidity design, and competition with USD stablecoins.
Stablecoin distribution is becoming a network access problem. Wallets, exchanges, PSPs, brokers, and embedded finance platforms need interoperability, regulated issuance, liquidity, and compliance controls that let users move between stablecoin networks without adding operational friction.
New York licensing remains a key test for institutional digital asset firms. Exchanges, custodians, brokers, lenders, and compliance teams should track which firms secure state level approvals because market access, client onboarding, and institutional trust still depend on regulated operating permissions.
USD account access is becoming embedded infrastructure for global platforms, not just a bank product. Fintechs, PSPs, marketplaces, payroll firms, and treasury teams should watch how account issuance, compliance controls, real time payments, and stablecoin rails converge inside programmable payment stacks.
Canadian dollar stablecoins are beginning to enter practical payment flows instead of remaining treasury or trading instruments. PSPs, banks, remittance firms, treasury teams, and compliance groups should watch how regulated stablecoin settlement changes cross border payout speed, corridor economics, liquidity management, and payment competition. CADC infrastructure continues to expand across Canadian digital payment markets.
Bitcoin reserve legislation is turning digital assets into a public balance sheet question, not just a market regulation debate. Crypto firms, custodians, exchanges, treasury teams, investors, and policymakers should track how federal reserve asset policy, seized digital asset management, and national competitiveness arguments reshape the next phase of U.S. crypto policy.
Card network economics are moving deeper into formal regulatory reporting. Merchants, acquirers, issuers, PSPs, payment networks, and embedded payment platforms should track how fee transparency, profitability evidence, and scheme oversight affect payment costs and competitive pressure across card acceptance.
The FCA is creating a clearer supervisory channel for firms that are already scaling, not just early sandbox participants. That matters because fast growth often creates new questions around controls, governance, technology, and consumer impact before a firm becomes systemically important.
Prediction markets are becoming a direct federal versus state jurisdiction fight. Exchanges, fintech platforms, compliance teams, policymakers, and investors should track how courts treat event contracts because the outcome could affect federal derivatives oversight, state gambling authority, consumer protection rules, and regulated forecasting markets.
Federal policymakers increasingly treat fintech infrastructure as part of U.S. financial competitiveness strategy. Banks, PSPs, digital asset firms, payment companies, and infrastructure providers should track how payment rail access, supervision, settlement services, and master account policy evolve as regulators face growing pressure to integrate fintech firms into core financial systems.
UK stablecoin policy is moving toward draft rule text and implementation design. Stablecoin issuers, banks, PSPs, custodians, wallets, and treasury teams should track how the Bank balances financial stability controls with usable payment products, especially around issuance limits, redemption, reserves, and access to settlement infrastructure.
Lowering community bank burden can open capacity, not just reduce paperwork. Fintechs, sponsor banks, core providers, lenders, and compliance teams should track whether tailored supervision gives smaller banks more room to partner, modernize, lend, and support local payment and deposit infrastructure.
Onchain markets need clearing and netting controls before more institutions treat them as reliable operating channels. Trading firms, custodians, brokers, stablecoin networks, and treasury teams should track how private obligation matching, liquidity savings, and counterparty controls develop across institutional digital asset markets.
Prediction markets are moving beyond politics and sports into private capital market intelligence. Exchanges, investors, fintech platforms, regulators, and market infrastructure providers should track how forecasting markets, institutional secondary market data, and tokenized trading systems increasingly converge around private company price discovery and market sentiment.
Regional exchange infrastructure competition continues to expand beyond traditional Western commodity benchmarks. Exchanges, clearing firms, commodity traders, treasury groups, and market infrastructure operators should track how Singapore based benchmarks, physical delivery systems, and digitally enabled collateral infrastructure increasingly support Asian commodity trade and price discovery.
The case is a governance and creditor risk warning for Canada’s fintech funding market. Investors, lenders, founders, and boards should keep closer watch on treasury controls, debt covenants, founder conduct, and creditor transparency as capital becomes more selective.
Canada’s MSB compliance risk is increasingly visible across multi service fintech models. Crypto firms, PSPs, FX dealers, remittance platforms, investors, and compliance teams should keep registration data current, map services accurately, and treat FINTRAC responsiveness as an operating requirement.
Payments, digital assets, AI fraud controls, and capital markets infrastructure are being rebuilt by registered firms with licenses, distribution, data, and balance sheets. Smaller fintechs can still win, but only where they solve a real operating problem and plug into the financial system with trust from day one. The opportunity is still open, but it will favour teams that move quickly, stay compliant, earn trust, and turn infrastructure change into useful products for customers, merchants, investors, and institutions.
NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 22, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Regulation And Policy, Capital Formation And Venture Markets

Image: Hester Peirce (aka Crypto Mom)
On May 21, 2026, reports confirmed that SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce will leave the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission later this year to join Regent University School of Law, closing one of the most closely watched regulatory tenures in digital asset policy.
Peirce became affectionately known globally as “Crypto Mom” because she consistently argued that regulators should give digital asset markets workable rules instead of leaving companies to operate inside uncertainty. Her positions moved from controversial to increasingly mainstream as spot bitcoin ETFs launched, tokenization expanded, and major financial institutions entered digital asset infrastructure.
Her departure doesn't mean pro crypto or pro innovation momentum suddenly disappears from Washington. Digital assets no longer depend on a single regulator defending the sector. Bitcoin ETFs now trade in regulated markets. Large banks are building tokenization infrastructure. Stablecoin legislation continues advancing across major jurisdictions. Institutional adoption no longer sits at the fringe.
Still, Peirce leaves behind a clear regulatory record.
For years, she pushed back against regulation through enforcement. She argued that uncertainty weakens both innovation and investor protection because companies struggle to build compliant products when the rules remain unclear.
Many of the issues she raised directly affected fintech competition, startup capital formation, tokenization, crowdfunding, and investor participation. Her speeches consistently returned to the same core themes, such as open markets, proportional regulation, investor choice, and transparent rulemaking.
Peirce’s bluntest critique came during the long debate over regulation through enforcement, where she warned that private meetings with crypto firms cannot replace open rulemaking:
“It’s just not a good way of regulating.”
Her frustration with the SEC’s long delay on spot bitcoin funds became even clearer when spot bitcoin ETFs finally won approval after years of rejected applications:
“We squandered a decade of opportunities to do our job.”
Peirce’s Token Safe Harbor proposal became one of the most discussed crypto policy frameworks because it tried to give blockchain networks time to decentralize before full securities obligations applied.
Her public rulemaking philosophy also stood out in her University of Central Florida FinTech Summit remarks, where she urged regulators to approach innovation with both skepticism and openness instead of reflexive resistance. She later warned that poor engagement damages the relationship between regulators and innovators:
“We are scaring people off from coming in and having a conversation with us.”
Even when she defended innovation, Peirce did not argue for eliminating rules. In her statement on tokenized securities, she welcomed the promise of blockchain while drawing a hard compliance line:
“Tokenization may facilitate capital formation and enhance investors’ ability to use their assets as collateral.”
She also added the part many crypto promoters prefer to skip:
“Tokenized securities are still securities.”
That balance partly explains why Peirce maintained credibility across crypto markets and traditional finance circles. She supported innovation, but she also believed markets work best when participants understand the rules.
Her influence reached beyond crypto. Peirce consistently supported broader access to capital markets, regulatory transparency, and competition for smaller firms. Those priorities aligned closely with long standing NCFA positions on equity crowdfunding and capital markets modernization, fintech competitiveness, and proportional regulation for emerging companies.
Very few SEC commissioners become recognizable public figures outside securities law circles. Peirce did because she represented a different philosophy of regulation during one of the most contested periods in financial technology policy.
Her departure closes an important chapter at the SEC. But the larger debates around tokenization, digital asset infrastructure, market access, and programmable finance are now deeply embedded across global financial systems. Those discussions continue with or without Crypto Mom inside the building.
Peirce also engaged directly with the broader fintech and innovation community over the years, including participating in NCFA’s FFCON21: Breaking Barriers program.
On behalf of everyone at NCFA, we thank Hester Peirce for consistently contributing to open debate around innovation, competition, investor choice, and access to capital during one of the most important periods in modern financial market development. We wish her continued success in this next chapter.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
May 20, 2026 | NCFA Resource | Regulation And Policy, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization

On April 20, 2026, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published its Innovation Insights 2025 report (20 page PDF). The report gives fintech founders, investors, and policy teams a practical view of where capital, regulatory testing, and market demand are concentrating across AI, digital assets, stablecoins, tokenization, RegTech, open finance, embedded finance, and operational automation.
The FCA points to a more disciplined phase of fintech, where firms need clear customer value, stronger controls, earlier regulatory engagement, and credible deployment plans.
The report combines global fintech investment data with activity across FCA innovation services, including the Regulatory Sandbox, Innovation Pathways, Digital Sandbox, AI Lab, Supercharged Sandbox, Smart Data Accelerator, and Scale Up Unit.
The overview gives operators a clean read on regulated fintech demand. AI, distributed ledger technology, open banking, and open finance ranked among the main technologies used by applicants. The FCA also launched new support channels in 2025, including a stablecoins cohort.
Regulated fintech no longer wins on novelty alone. Better products need stronger evidence, safer testing routes, sharper governance, and a realistic route from pilot to production.
This resource is useful for fintech founders, investors, compliance teams, financial institutions, policymakers, accelerators, digital asset firms, AI builders, RegTech vendors, and open finance teams tracking where regulated innovation is gaining traction.
It is especially useful for firms building around AI governance, stablecoins, tokenization, compliance automation, open finance, embedded finance, and supervised testing models.
The report is strong on investment patterns, regulatory engagement, sector demand, and FCA innovation service activity. It helps founders and investors see which fintech themes are attracting capital and which models need earlier regulator dialogue.
Its limit is the report doesn't provide a full outcomes study on sandbox firm performance, revenue growth, compliance cost reduction, productivity gains, fraud reduction, or investor returns. It works best as a regulatory market map, not proof that any one fintech category will outperform.
Canada and other jurisdictions can still use the report as a benchmark. Faster testing routes, clearer engagement models, and stronger links between experimentation and responsible deployment are becoming competitive advantages in financial innovation.
FCA Innovation Insights 2025 (primary FCA report)
AI Agents Enter Governed Financial Workflows (AI governance and controls)
Tokenization Starts Looking Like Financial Infrastructure (tokenized market infrastructure)
Deloitte And Stablecorp Bring QCAD To Banks (Canadian stablecoin infrastructure)
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
August 26th, 2025
January 4th, 2024
June 1st, 2021
September 9th, 2020
July 9th, 2018
January 3rd, 2018
September 25th, 2017
June 20th, 2017
May 10th, 2017
December 14th, 2016
NCFA Canada
Craig Asano
CEO and Executive Director
casano@ncfacanada.org
ncfacanada.org


