Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
March 11, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Insight | Capital Markets Infrastructure

On March 11 2026, the European Central Bank released the Appia roadmap for Europe’s tokenised finance. The plan runs through 2028 and sets out how the Eurosystem will explore tokenized wholesale financial markets while keeping central bank money at the center of settlement. The ECB says Pontes, a near term interoperability layer, is expected to launch in the third quarter of 2026, while Appia will guide the longer term design of a more integrated tokenized financial ecosystem. While Europe is still studying the final model, the roadmap highlights that ECB is treating tokenization as a market infrastructure question.
The ECB is working in two stages. Pontes is the near term step. The Eurosystem’s DLT settlement page says Pontes is designed to connect distributed ledger platforms to existing Eurosystem settlement services so euro transactions on those platforms can settle in central bank money. The ECB has said Pontes is expected to launch in Q3 2026.
Appia is the longer term view. The ECB says it will explore how a broader tokenized financial ecosystem could develop over time, including questions around architecture, governance, standards, and integration. In other words, Pontes is addressing immediate settlement demand, while Appia looks at where wholesale tokenized finance may go next.
The roadmap focuses on wholesale financial markets, not everyday consumer payments. The money used in these systems would move between regulated financial institutions such as banks, central counterparties, and settlement providers.
This is an important distinction because retail CBDC proposals raise questions about public accounts, privacy, and how people use digital money day to day. The ECB roadmap is different. It is about how tokenized securities, deposits, and other financial assets could settle safely between institutions using tokenized central bank money.
It's a wholesale CBDC model that moves central bank money on distributed ledger infrastructure. The goal is to modernize market infrastructure, not replace cash or consumer bank accounts.
Tokenization allows financial instruments such as bonds, funds, deposits, and collateral to exist as programmable digital representations on distributed ledgers. That can reduce reconciliation steps and shorten settlement chains. But tokenized markets still need a settlement asset that participants trust.
The ECB is making clear that it wants central bank money to remain that anchor. That is a big difference from models that rely mainly on private stablecoins or commercial bank liabilities. Central bank money carries the lowest credit risk in the system because it is a direct claim on the central bank itself.
The ECB’s Appia overview says the initiative is the cornerstone of the Eurosystem strategy to provide central bank money within tokenized wholesale financial markets. It also says tokenized central bank money under Appia would go beyond the interoperability model delivered by Pontes and would be more integrated into a wider new financial ecosystem.
Europe is entering a wider global race around tokenized market infrastructure. The BIS Project Agorá is exploring how tokenized commercial bank money and tokenized wholesale central bank money could work together on a common digital payments platform. The BIS says that work is aimed at improving cross border payments while keeping central banks at the core of final settlement.
Hong Kong is also moving quickly. The HKMA’s November 2025 Project Ensemble update says its pilot environment will be progressively enhanced through 2026 to support settlement in tokenized central bank money on a 24/7 basis (see Standard Chartered CEO Backs Tokenized Finance in Hong Kong). The HKMA has also used tokenized bond issuance, including HK$800M in tokenised green bonds in 2023 and about HK$6B in 2024.
That means the ECB is joining a growing group of major institutions that now see tokenized settlement as a serious part of future market design.
As NCFA recently noted in its analysis of how tokenized infrastructure is changing market operations, Canada has already taken early steps through stablecoin policy work, open banking progress without a confirmed implementation date, and payment modernization efforts. But the foundations for tokenized markets are still incomplete. Canada’s Real Time Rail is not yet live and is expected after 2026. Canada also still needs clearer legal recognition of digital ledger registers for securities, stronger real time settlement across institutions, and digital identity standards that work across ledgers while supporting KYC and AML requirements.
Canada has strong institutions and credible capital markets, but it doesn't yet appear to have a public multi year wholesale tokenized settlement roadmap comparable to Appia. If other jurisdictions define the standards and operating models first, Canadian firms may end up adapting to systems built eleswhere.
Pontes is expected in 2026. Appia runs through 2028. Those dates don't automatically mean Europe has committed to one final settlement model today. However they do mean that a major central bank is now putting dates, structure, and policy intent around tokenized wholesale finance market infrastructure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 12, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Digital Assets And Payments Compliance
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
On Mar 11 2026, Hong Kong based stablecoin payments firm RedotPay outlined regulatory progress across Canada, the United States, and Argentina as it builds the registrations required to operate in more regulated markets.
The company holds Money Services Business registration with FinCEN in the United States and registration with FINTRAC in Canada (jurisdiction of incorporation is the province of BC), and is pursuing Virtual Asset Service Provider registration in Argentina. These steps allow the firm to work with regulated partners as it expands its stablecoin payment platform.
RedotPay offers a wallet and card based payment system built around stablecoins, allowing users to send digital assets while recipients receive local currency. The company says its platform now serves more than six million users across over 100 countries and processes roughly $10 billion in annualized payment volume.
Stablecoin payment platforms often present themselves as borderless financial infrastructure. In practice, access still depends on local regulatory registration. Firms must establish compliance credentials before banks, card networks, payment processors, and institutional partners will work with them.
In Canada, FINTRAC registration places RedotPay inside Canada's anti money laundering supervision framework. For digital asset payment companies, that registration is typically the first threshold for operating credibly and building domestic partnerships.
Other rules may also apply depending on the product model, including the Bank of Canada’s Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA) for payment service providers and provincial securities oversight for certain digital asset activities.
Competition in crypto payments is moving away from unique app features alone and toward regulated distribution. Firms that secure registrations across multiple jurisdictions gain earlier access to payment rails, banking relationships, and local partner networks. Firms that delay those steps often remain limited even if their technology works.
It's a dynamic that's becoming more visible as stablecoin payment platforms grow. Compliance infrastructure is no longer just a back office function. It increasingly determines which firms can expand internationally and which ones stall when regulatory scrutiny increases.
As stablecoin payment firms expand globally, will long term advantage come from product features or from who can secure regulated market access first?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 11, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Policy And Regulation And Market Entry

On Feb 26 2026, OSFI announced targeted fast track approvals framework for new applicants seeking to become federally regulated financial institutions. OSFI says the framework will launch in June 2026, and the goal is a quicker, clearer, more predictable approval process for eligible new entrants, without lowering prudential oversight.
The regulator limits the initial scope to two groups. One group is provincial credit unions seeking continuance as a federal credit union. The other group is entities with technologically innovative or emerging banking models, including fintechs and crypto asset custodians, that seek to incorporate as a bank or a federally regulated trust and loan company.
The framework will use right sized, risk based prudential reviews and provide clearer guidance on requirements and timelines. OSFI also points to service standards and a planned dashboard to track progress. Also noted is that the application fees won't change, and it will not refund fees if timelines are not met. OSFI says it will use what it learns to refine its processes to support a broader rollout later.
OSFI limits fast track entry to provincial credit unions seeking federal continuance and to innovative or emerging models seeking to incorporate as a bank or a federally regulated trust and loan company. In practical terms, and without naming specific companies, the most likely early candidates are firms that already run bank grade controls and need a federal licence to unlock the next product layer.
That includes fintechs offering primary account style products at scale, custody first firms that want a federal trust model, payments and treasury infrastructure firms expanding into trust style services, and mature wealth or brokerage platforms that want a bank or trust licence to bring more of the stack in house.
Canada’s competition problem is not only about products. It is also about who can enter the system and how predictable the regulatory approval path is. A clear approval path lets founders and boards plan capital, governance, compliance hires, vendor choices, and launch sequencing around a known process. That can reduce the cost of fintechs and challenger banks attempting a regulated model in Canada. Faster entry can increase competition and widen choice for consumers and small businesses, but only if the rules are clear enough that serious teams and investors can commit early.
Crypto custody firms also get a clear signal. By including crypto asset custodians in scope for this initial fast track approval framework, it puts digital asset custody on the list of models OSFI is willing to assess through a defined entry framework.
Having said that, service standards need to execute in real timelines. The dashboards mentioned by OSFI need to publish meaningful progress indicators, not vague stages. The review still needs to be rigorous, but the timeline and progress pathway needs to be legible enough that applicants know what is coming next and when.
If OSFI delivers a faster and more predictable regulatory entry approval framework without lowering the bar, which new models actually enter first, fintech banks, federal credit unions, or crypto custodians?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 9, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets And Policy And Regulation

Image: Unsplash/J K
On March 9 2026, the U.S. Treasury released a report to Congress on innovative technologies to counter illicit finance involving digital assets under the GENIUS Act. Treasury says successful monthly transactions on public blockchains reached 3.8 billion in early 2025, up 96% year over year. Treasury also reviewed more than 220 public comments while preparing the report. Against that backdrop, the report goes on the record to say crypto mixers can support laundering and sanctions evasion, but they can also serve legitimate privacy needs on public blockchains.
Treasury doesn't overlook the enforcement case against cyrpto mixers, saying criminals commonly use mixing, bridging, and swapping to obscure transaction trails and frustrate investigations. Treasury links these techniques to ransomware groups, darknet markets, sanctions evasion schemes, and DPRK cyber actors. The scale of harm remains large.
Victims reported more than $9 billion in digital asset related fraud to the FBI in 2024, including $5.8 billion tied to digital asset investment schemes, up 47% from the prior year. Treasury also says DPRK cybercriminals stole at least $2.8 billion in digital assets from January 2024 to September 2025, including a $1.5 billion theft in February 2025 that Treasury describes as the largest digital asset heist to date.
The report states that lawful users may use mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains. Treasury gives practical examples. Individuals may want to protect sensitive information such as personal wealth, business payments, charitable donations, or consumer spending patterns from appearing on public ledgers.
That statement changes the tone of the policy debate. The question is no longer whether mixers exist only for criminals. The policy challenge is whether privacy tools can operate with sufficient accountability, recordkeeping, and supervision inside the financial system.
Treasury also notes that custodial mixers that accept and transmit value must register with FinCEN as money services businesses, maintain records, and file suspicious activity reports. When compliant, these services can provide customer identities, off chain transaction data, and behavioural information to regulators or law enforcement.
Treasury also describes how mixers interact with broader digital asset infrastructure. Stablecoins frequently appear in laundering chains when illicit actors transfer assets across blockchains or prepare to convert digital assets into fiat.
Since May 2020, Treasury says more than $37.4 billion in withdrawals from over 50 bridges were denominated in the two largest stablecoins by market capitalization. During the same period those bridges received about $1.6 billion in deposits originating from mixing services. Treasury says more than $900 million of those deposits flowed into one specific bridge that faced scrutiny for DPRK linked laundering (North Korea state-sponsored).
A large part of the report focuses on the technologies Treasury believes financial institutions should use to strengthen anti money laundering and sanctions compliance programs. Treasury highlights four priority tools: artificial intelligence, digital identity, blockchain analytics, and application programming interfaces.
Treasury cites FinCEN analysis showing about 1.6 million identity related BSA reports in 2021, equal to 42% of reports filed that year and tied to $212 billion in suspicious activity. Treasury says AI can help institutions analyze large datasets and reduce false positives, digital identity systems can strengthen customer onboarding and fraud detection, blockchain analytics tools can trace wallet activity across networks, and APIs can improve secure monitoring and information sharing.
The next evolution of digital asset infrastructure will likely reward firms at the forefront of regulatory accountability that can distinguish lawful privacy from criminal abuse, strengthen identity and monitoring controls, and provide institutions with faster and more accurate compliance tools.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
March 6, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer Weekly Intelligence | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Regulation And Policy, Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Sustainable Finance And ESG

Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026).
This is for AI first fintechs, SaaS platforms, and builders selling usage heavy products because AI cost recovery is moving out of finance spreadsheets and into the billing stack itself. This means markup, model pricing, and token usage can all be baked directly into a single workflow.
This affects crypto custody, brokerage, and compliance tooling teams, plus firms that run secondary market controls, because it pushes more of the crypto perimeter into client asset rule design while tightening where firms must look for core market mechanics requirements.
This changes the operating timetable for lenders, brokers, and claims handling firms, and it pulls more pressure onto complaint intake, identity checks, fraud controls, and customer communications. Fintechs offering claims workflow solutions, onboarding checks, and redress automation now need to map product readiness to the late March rules and the 3 to 5 month build window.
This opens an official lane that matters for remittance firms, merchant payments providers, instant payments infrastructure teams, and institutions building Canada India payment flows. Once payment system operators are invited into the file, the discussion moves closer to real operating design, not just diplomacy.
This opens a new regulated advice lane between generic guidance and individual advice. It affects banks, pension providers, wealth platforms, and fintechs building support flows, because firms now have a near term path to turn customer guidance into a permissioned product with real conduct and authorisation consequences.
This is important for issuers, dealers, custodians, and market infrastructure teams because a central bank backed trial now shows how tokenized bonds and central bank settlement money can run through an on chain workflow, which raises expectations on governance, auditability, and integration before this model can scale beyond pilots.
A major exchange operator is tying its regulated futures roadmap to crypto spot reference prices while pushing tokenized equities distribution through a large crypto customer base.
This is for banks, payment infrastructure firms, tokenization platforms, and securities settlement providers. The BOJ is linking blockchain, tokenized central bank money, and core settlement design to active pilots, sandbox work, and future upgrades to BOJ NET, which raises the bar for how seriously the market should treat settlement infrastructure moving on chain.
This raises the enforcement baseline for broker dealers and their vendors. If you create or sell onboarding, surveillance, AML, or case management tooling, expect more pressure to prove risk based controls, faster SAR decisioning, and audit ready evidence because regulators are treating gaps in thinly traded securities monitoring as a serious control failure.
This is a positive announcement for fintech vendors that sell to government, defence, banks, and critical infrastructure. AI evaluation, cybercrime response, and resilience checks start to converge across buyers.
As Canada and Australia open the door to more pension investment, investors will want simple, auditable reporting and quick due diligence, especially for payments, AI, and critical supply chain projects.
This delay ties up cash for importers and their banks. When refunds take weeks to process, treasury teams need tighter visibility into duty exposure, eligibility tracking, and cash forecasting, and that opens room for fintech tools that automate reconciliation and working capital decisions created by policy whiplash.
This could impact how payments teams operate. If merchants can query verified payments events in natural language and automate workflows on top of unified data, AI payments will run the operating layer for routing, fraud, disputes, and cost control, which raises expectations on data quality, lineage, and accountability across the payments stack.
The Fed is opening a controlled access point for a crypto linked institution inside the U.S. payments system. That sets a live precedent for how non bank and digital asset firms may be handled under account access rules, even where service scope stays tightly constrained.
This for issuers, acquirers, sponsor banks, card fintechs, and treasury teams because stablecoins are moving closer to core network settlement, not just crypto side rails. Once a global card network starts wiring a bank issued stablecoin into settlement flow, teams need a clearer view on treasury design, reconciliation, network rules, and what faster money movement looks like in practice.
This pushes stablecoins deeper into everyday card economics, not just niche crypto wallets. It matters for issuers, program managers, fintech developers, and infrastructure teams because card issuance, settlement, and reconciliation are starting to move into the same onchain operating stack at global scale.
Singapore is placing climate transition planning inside supervised financial risk management rather than limiting it to public reporting. The approach gives Canadian regulators and institutions a comparator for connecting climate data, portfolio decisions, customer engagement and governance while avoiding blunt exclusions that could restrict financing without reducing underlying risk.
Core financial infrastructure continues to move closer to programmable systems while regulators tighten the rules around how firms operate and protect customers. Stablecoins are entering card settlement, tokenized bonds are moving through central bank backed pilots, and AI usage is starting to show up directly inside billing and payments operations. At the same time, regulators are opening new product lanes and expanding oversight of crypto custody, advice models, and consumer finance practices. NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets, subscribe to NCFA weekly newsletter updates, view a rundown of current fintech news and insights, or dive into the latest fintech industry research.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 5, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets And Policy And Regulation

On January 29 2026, at the joint SEC CFTC event in Washington titled CFTC SEC Harmonization U.S. Financial Leadership in the Crypto Era.
CFTC Chair Michael S. Selig’s remarks laid out a detailed US policy direction for crypto market structure. The speech goes past broad support for innovation and points to specific rule work on tokenized collateral, perpetual derivatives, software safe harbours, retail leveraged crypto trading, and event contracts.
SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins’ remarks support the same direction from the SEC side, which is part Project Crypto.
“Fragmented regulation in an integrated market is not a safeguard for investors so much as a source of confusion among them.”
That line from Atkins defines the problem. Unclear boundaries change how firms structure products, where they launch, and how much they spend on compliance before they can scale.
“Project Crypto recognizes that crypto markets span across our agencies’ respective regulatory boundaries.”
Selig starts from the point that crypto products don't fit neatly into older lines between agencies. Clearer lines are needed to cut the cost of operating in uncertainty.
“I have directed CFTC staff to develop rules to enable the responsible deployment of additional forms of eligible tokenized collateral.”
Eligible collateral is what a trading venue accepts to back positions. It decides how much margin traders need, how fast funds move, and how safely trades settle. If the CFTC allows more tokenized assets to count as eligible collateral, more crypto trading can happen inside regulated U.S. markets, but custody and collateral movement will need tighter controls and clearer proof that assets are protected and available when they are needed.
“The CFTC will use the tools at its disposal to onshore perpetual and other novel derivative products so that they can flourish across both centralized and decentralized markets, subject to appropriate safeguards.”
Perpetuals are a popular kind of crypto futures that many platforms offer outside the U.S. If U.S. rules start allowing them in a regulated way, more trading, market making, and new product builds can move onshore. That would also make it harder for offshore exchanges to keep growing just because the U.S. has no clear legal path today.
“The CFTC will explore ways in which the agency can encourage innovation in software development and support builders as they work toward product market fit, including by assessing whether an innovation exemption may be appropriate in certain circumstances.”
This targets a hard issue in crypto regulation. Wallets, interfaces, and on chain software do not fit cleanly into rules built around centralized intermediaries. If the CFTC creates clearer room for software development and early stage testing, legal uncertainty will be reduced for teams building core infrastructure.
“As part of this harmonization effort, we will examine whether substituted compliance can achieve equivalent or better regulatory outcomes at lower costs for market participants.”
This is about cost, duplication, and speed. Overlapping requirements can turn compliance into a barrier to entry. Substituted compliance can cut repeated work where two regimes are trying to solve the same control problem.
“Within the bounds of the law and where appropriate, market participants should be able to offer multiple products through a single platform without navigating an inefficient patchwork of registrations and overlapping regulatory regimes.”
This points to a model where firms can run more of their product stack under one platform instead of splitting activity across separate legal and operational silos. That can improve operating leverage for exchanges, brokers, and infrastructure firms that want to offer more than one regulated product. Also see broader SEC direction in Atkins crypto rules testimony.
“I have directed CFTC staff to begin drafting rules clarifying when leveraged, margined, or financed retail commodity transactions in crypto may be offered off-exchange under an ‘actual delivery’ exception.”
Retail users can already get leveraged crypto in some places, but U.S. rules have left big gaps in what is clearly allowed. If the CFTC writes clearer rules, firms will know which leverage products they can offer, which ones are off limits, and what steps they must follow to stay compliant.
“I have directed CFTC staff to explore the creation of a new category of DCM registration that is tailored specifically to retail leveraged, margined, or financed crypto asset trading.”
This suggests the CFTC may create a new kind of regulated exchange category built specifically for retail leveraged crypto trading. If it does, firms will be able to design products and go to market using a clearer venue rulebook, and exchanges will compete on who can offer the best compliant access and distribution.
“First, I have directed CFTC staff to withdraw the 2024 event contracts rule proposal that would prohibit political and sports-related event contracts and the 2025 staff advisory.”
This removes a major source of uncertainty around prediction markets.
“Second, looking ahead, and in the spirit of markets that trade on expectations, I have directed CFTC staff to move forward with drafting an event contracts rulemaking.”
Withdrawing the old proposal reduces near term uncertainty, but new event contract regulations would spell out which event-based contracts are allowed, what monitoring and controls platforms must run, and how firms can build prediction style products without guessing where the line is.
These speech commitments point to a practical attempt to aggregate more products, more liquidity, and more infrastructure into regulated US channels. Tokenized collateral, perpetuals, retail leveraged crypto, and event contracts are all in the spotlight with real market share potential. Companies that can meet the bar for custody, risk controls, disclosures, and auditable operations can begin building onshore products more confidentially than they could before.
The CFTC and SEC discussion focuses on market structure, but tokenized collateral and onshore crypto venues still rely on a settlement instrument that can hold up under supervision. That is why the stablecoin perimeter matters.
On February 25, 2026, the OCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (See: OCC stablecoin NPRM) to implement the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act) for payment stablecoin issuance and related activities under OCC jurisdiction, including national banks and their subsidiaries, federal savings associations and their subsidiaries, federal branches and their subsidiaries, and foreign payment stablecoin issuers, along with entities approved as federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers and certain state qualified issuers. The OCC points to a new 12 CFR 15 that covers reserve assets, redemption, risk management, audits and supervision, custody, applications and registrations, examination of foreign issuers, and a capital and operational backstop.
While the OCC moves ahead with rulemaking under the GENIUS Act, the legislative framework for crypto market structure is still contested in Washington. A Reuters report from March 5, 2026 on the crypto bill impasse in Congress describes renewed disagreement over stablecoin related customer rewards and whether they could draw deposits away from banks. The dispute shows that even as regulators move ahead with rules for trading infrastructure, tokenized collateral, and stablecoin issuance, Congress is still debating how far crypto firms should be allowed to compete with the traditional deposit system.
If the CFTC and SEC push tokenized collateral, perpetuals, and event contracts into regulated channels while the OCC pushes stablecoin issuance into a bank style rulebook, does the next U.S. advantage move to firms that can run both market structure and the cash leg under supervision?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Mar 4, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Insight | Digital Assets And Policy And Regulation

Image: Freepik/diana.grytsku
On February 27 2026, the FCA set the application window for UK cryptoasset permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The window opens on September 30 2026 and closes on February 28 2027. FCA webinar guidance also points to October 25 2027 as the date the new regime goes live.
This confirms the UK is moving crypto firms into the same permissioned structure used across traditional financial services (UK draft crypto rules). A firm that already operates under anti money laundering registration now faces a full authorisation process, a narrower transition path, and a higher standard on governance, controls, safeguarding, financial resources, and senior accountability.
The UK model prioritizes integration with established financial regulation. It raises the operating bar and can favour firms with stronger compliance infrastructure, clearer ownership structures, and the capital to support ongoing supervision. That can improve institutional credibility, but it also increases readiness cost and raises the threshold for smaller firms.
The EU model is different. MiCA creates a dedicated crypto rulebook, and that structure supports cross border expansion through one member state authorisation and EU passporting. One licence can open access across the single market. NCFA has already covered that operating advantage in MiCA licence unlocks EU access.
Canada has a domestic passport framework, but it's not the same as EU style passporting across sovereign countries inside a single massively connected market. CSA regulatory cooperation reduces duplication across participating provinces and territories, but Ontario does has not formally adopted the passport rule despite Canada's need to reduce duplication and regulatory burden. Ontario's passport status still emains outside MI 11-102, with Ontario using an interface and reliance model instead.
A Canadian crypto platform can use the passport process to expand across much of Canada, but of course it doesn't get the scale benefit that MiCA passporting provides across the EU with market access to 450 million. The compliance cost can still be high, while the addressable market remains much smaller. Canada also continues to raise the operating bar through supervision and custody expectations, including CIRO’s digital asset custody framework. See: NCFA’s Weekly Fintech Intelligence Jan 31-Feb 6, 2026.
Collectively this puts Canada's approach to crypto regulation closer to the UK on operating discipline than to the EU on market scale. Also worth noting varying consumer differences between UK and Canada crypto consumers.
These models now reward different business strategies. The UK offers deeper integration with traditional financial supervision and may suit firms that want institutional positioning, bank grade credibility, and a tighter regulatory perimeter.
The EU offers faster regional scale through passporting and may suit firms that need broader customer reach across multiple markets.
Canada offers a more controlled path, but one that can be slower to scale and more operationally demanding relative to market size.
For exchanges, brokerages, wallets, custody providers, and compliance firms, this is now a jurisdiction choice with direct consequences for licensing cost, expansion speed, product sequencing, and capital planning. For investors, it changes where operating leverage may be easiest to achieve. The question is not whether crypto gets regulated. The question is which regulatory architecture creates the best conditions for durable growth.
When the UK raises the authorisation bar, the EU offers passporting scale, and Canada keeps a tighter supervised path, which model attracts more builders, more capital, and more long term market share?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
August 26th, 2025
January 4th, 2024
June 1st, 2021
September 9th, 2020
July 9th, 2018
January 3rd, 2018
September 25th, 2017
June 20th, 2017
May 10th, 2017
December 14th, 2016

NCFA Canada
Craig Asano
CEO and Executive Director
casano@ncfacanada.org
ncfacanada.org




