Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Mar 2, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Funding Access And Market Structure

On March 2 2026, FrontFundr and Swoop launched a funding partnership that brings equity, debt, and specialized financing into one coordinated path for Canadian startups.
FrontFundr enters the partnership with more than 69,000 investors, more than $336 million in processed investments, more than 35,000 transactions, and more than 285 successful raises.
Peter-Paul Van Hoeken, Founder & CEO of FrontFundr:
“Raising capital is rarely straightforward, and founders shouldn’t have to navigate fragmented options alone. By partnering with Swoop, we’re giving startups a single, coordinated path to financing, so they can focus on building their business instead of managing complexity.”
Swoop Finance, launched in the UK in 2018, adds a broader financing reach with more than $2.5 billion in completed funding for more than 282,000 global customers. Together, that combines community based equity access with a wider range of debt and structured funding options.
Daire Burke, Head of Swoop North America
“Canadian startups need access to both capital and guidance to grow efficiently. Working together with FrontFundr allows us to combine our expertise in loans, grants, and financing solutions with FrontFundr’s equity crowdfunding platform, creating a seamless funding experience for founders.”
Founders rarely use one funding tool from start to scale. Equity can fund product development and early traction. Loans, lines of credit, grants, asset-backed financing, acquisition finance, and other structured products can support working capital, expansion, and specific transactions. A combined and simplified path can reduce friction at a time when founders still lose time moving between separate funding providers.
For Canada, this points to a more connected funding stack at a time when Canadian venture funding pressure continues to make capital access one of the hardest constraints on startup growth. The stronger platforms offer more than one product, and help founders match the right capital to the right stage with less delay and less administrative drag.
For founders and investors, access to capital is becoming a workflow issue as much as a supply issue. Platforms that combine investor reach, financing options, and execution support can become more valuable than standalone marketplaces.
As startup funding gets harder to piece together, does long term value move to platforms that control more of the capital journey, not just one part of it?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Feb 10, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Alternative Finance and Capital Markets

On February 10 2026, UK POP rules go live, removing the old prospectus trigger that made large public raises expensive, slow, and out of reach for many private companies.
For years, UK companies faced a hard line. If a business raised more than €8 million in securities from the public in a year, it had to produce a full prospectus (NB: the UK retained that euro-denominated threshold in its domestic framework post-brexit). Crowdcube says that prospectus costs could cost more than £250,000 and take months, which pushed many companies away from public community rounds even when demand existed.
Under the Public Offer Platform regime, raises above £5 million now run through a regulated POP, and the regime removes the upper fundraising cap for those offers (No more funding caps). Raises under £5 million remain outside the POP requirement, but regulated execution and investor protection expectations still apply.
Platforms now carry more responsibility for diligence, disclosure quality, and investor safeguards. That shifts the burden from a giant issuer document to a supervised platform process that can move faster.
The UK is not alone. In the United States, Crowdfund Capital Advisors submitted a $20M Reg CF petition asking the SEC to raise the Regulation Crowdfunding cap from $5M to $20M. In Europe, the European Digital Finance Association are pushing to increase the ECSP threshold from €5m to €12m.
After years of advocating, Canada finally harmonized nationally its startup-crowdfunding exemption in 2021, but regulators have kept the issuer cap conservative. Under National Instrument 45 110, eligible issuers can raise up to $1.5m in a 12 month period, which a growing company can quickly outgrow and end up soon looking for more funding via heavier paths for larger rounds. If the government wants to prioritize funding scape-ups, they should take another look at increasing equity crowdfunding caps in Canada to be in line with global peers.
This funding cap tension isn't new. In fact NCFA has been advocating for the OSC and CSA to raise issuer funding caps for years. In 2017 for example, NCFA petitioned to raise caps to modernize equity crowdfunding in Ontario. In 2019, $5m cap formed part of NCFA's recommendations to reduce regulatory burden and unlock growth capital. Again in 2020, during national harmonization discussions, NCFA advocated to modernize NI 45 110 including increasing caps to $5 million so the framework could match real funding needs in a digital economy.
Now with the UK FCA removing prospectus triggers and the US and EU push for higher caps, there may be a new policy window for Canada's equity crowdfunding participants to petition yet again. If other jurisdictions support $10m to $20m community rounds under platform oversight, Canada needs to decide whether it wants founders scaling here or structuring growth capital elsewhere.
A higher ceiling, including a path toward $5m and beyond, would better match growth stage reality while keeping platform level investor protection front and centre. The global direction of travel now strengthens the case for a renewed Canadian push grounded in data, experience, and competitiveness.
If regulated platforms can run larger public offers without a prospectus wall in the UK, what should Canada do next, raise the ceiling, create a platform lane for larger rounds, or keep the cap and accept that growth capital routes around Canada?
One practical takeaway stands out. POP style rules treat the platform as the compliance spine, not the issuer. That design can cut cost and time while still demanding clear disclosures, suitability controls, and due diligence at the point of sale. While Canada doesn't necessarily need to copy the UK, it does need a credible path for larger community rounds that doesn't force founders into a prospectus sized bill before they have the scale to absorb it.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer to peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
February 17 2026 | Equity Crowdfunding and Retail Investors

Image: Freepik/pressfoto
On February 16 2026, multiple UK reports say BrewDog has hired advisers to explore a potential sale after years of losses and slower growth. As a result, about 220,000 Equity for Punks retail shareholders may lose money depending on deal structure and payout priority.
Do you remember the Equity for Punks BrewDog story from years past? It was a story of community empowerment in the early days of the equity crowdfunding movement. NCFA and established partners like Crowdfund Insider tracked that momentum, such as when when BrewDog plans a $50M US equity crowdfunding round. The story today however offers practical lessons about capital structure, liquidity, and investor protection.
BrewDog built one of the most visible equity crowdfunding programs in the world through Equity for Punks. The model gave everyday consumers direct exposure to private company ownership and it proved that brand and community could mobilize serious capital.
In 2017 however, BrewDog took a major private equity investment from TSG Consumer Partners. Reporting in The Guardian describes preferential rights that sit ahead of common shareholders in a sale. That structure now drives the risk for small shareholders in the current sale process, based on how the deal structure affects what retail shareholders receive in a sale. The core point is simple. Structure governs outcomes in private markets.
Phil Halsey (47) invested about £2,500, starting in the second cash call in 2011:
“It’s extremely disappointing that it’s gone this way,” said Halsey. “The last time you could have done some form of cashing out was about a year and a half ago.”
1. Capital stack always decides the payout. Retail investors often focus on brand, traction, and growth narrative. Professional investors focus first on the capital stack. If a preferred investor holds liquidation preferences or other senior rights, that investor receives sale proceeds first. Common shareholders receive what remains. In a strong exit everyone wins. In a weaker exit, common shareholders may receive little or nothing. Investors should read share class terms and understand exactly where they sit before they invest.
2. Liquidity risk shows up at the worst time. Equity crowdfunding expands access, but it rarely guarantees a clean exit path. If investors rely on one big liquidity event, timing risk becomes real. Investors should treat these positions as long duration holdings. Founders and platforms should design credible liquidity pathways where rules allow, because trust grows when investors understand how they can eventually exit.
3. Growth narratives do not replace unit economics. The sale process follows years where BrewDog reported losses. When costs rise and category growth cools, expansion heavier models feel pressure quickly. Investors should challenge founders and operators on the road to profitability, not just the top line story. Founders should align growth with durable margins, because narrative alone doesn't protect valuation.
4. Community builds momentum but it does not hedge downside. Equity for Punks turns customers into owners and it proves that community capital can scale a consumer brand. That impact remains real. Yet community alignment does not override contractual rights in a sale. Retail investors should value perks and participation for what they are, and they should separate those benefits from expected financial return.
BrewDog's case encourages retail investors to have more mature conversations about disclosure, investor education, and deal structure literacy. For Canada, the case reinforces why clear explanations of share classes, payout priority, and realistic liquidity expectations are important for investor protection and long term market credibility.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
December 19, 2025

Image: Freepik/peoplecreations
Securing funding is one of the earliest and most consequential decisions a startup founder will make. The choice of how to finance a new business can influence everything from ownership and growth speed to risk exposure and long-term strategy. Yet for many early-stage founders, the funding landscape can feel fragmented and difficult to navigate.
Three common paths tend to emerge for Canadian startups in their early stages: bootstrapping, government grants, and crowdfunding. Each option offers distinct advantages and limitations, and the right choice often depends less on trends and more on a company’s goals, structure, and readiness.
Bootstrapping remains one of the most common ways founders fund their startups, particularly in the earliest stages. This approach relies on personal savings, revenue reinvestment, or income from other work rather than external funding.
The primary advantage of bootstrapping is control. Founders are not accountable to investors, lenders, or funding bodies, allowing them to make decisions quickly and pivot when needed. Bootstrapped startups also avoid dilution and debt, which can be appealing for founders who want to retain full ownership.
However, bootstrapping can limit growth. Without access to additional capital, scaling may happen more slowly, and founders often take on greater personal financial risk. This approach tends to work best for service-based businesses, digital products, or startups that can reach profitability quickly.
Government grants are an attractive option for founders seeking capital without giving up equity or taking on repayment obligations. In Canada, grants are often designed to support innovation, job creation, sustainability, and economic development.
For eligible founders, startup grants in Ontario can help offset costs related to research, hiring, training, or expansion. These programs can provide meaningful support, especially for early-stage companies that meet specific criteria.
That said, grants are rarely simple. Applications can be time-consuming, eligibility requirements are often strict, and funding timelines may not align with immediate cash flow needs. Many grants also reimburse expenses rather than providing upfront capital, which requires founders to plan carefully.
Grants tend to be best suited for startups that have a clear business plan, defined objectives, and the administrative capacity to manage reporting and compliance requirements.
Crowdfunding has become an increasingly popular funding option, particularly for consumer-facing startups and product-based businesses. Through reward-based, equity-based, or donation-based models, founders can raise capital directly from the public while simultaneously testing demand.
One of crowdfunding’s greatest advantages is validation. A successful campaign can demonstrate market interest before full-scale production or launch. It can also serve as a marketing tool, building an early community around a product or brand.
However, crowdfunding is not without challenges. Campaigns require significant preparation, clear messaging, and often upfront marketing spend. There is also reputational risk if a campaign fails or if founders struggle to deliver on promises after funding is secured.
Crowdfunding tends to work best for startups with a compelling story, a tangible offering, and the capacity to manage fulfillment and ongoing communication with supporters.
When deciding between bootstrapping, grants, and crowdfunding, founders often weigh several key factors:
There is no universally “best” option. Many startups combine approaches over time, starting with bootstrapping, supplementing with grants, and later exploring crowdfunding or other financing methods as the business matures.
Regardless of the funding path chosen, preparation plays a critical role in success. Founders who take time to establish proper documentation, clarify ownership, and formalize operations are often better positioned when opportunities arise.
This includes setting up the right business structure, maintaining accurate records, and understanding regulatory obligations. These foundational steps can influence eligibility for grants, credibility with crowdfunding backers, and overall readiness for growth.
Funding decisions are rarely isolated choices. They are part of a broader strategy that reflects a startup’s vision, capacity, and long-term plans.
Startup funding is not a one-size-fits-all decision. Bootstrapping, grants, and crowdfunding each offer viable routes, depending on a founder’s priorities and circumstances. By understanding the trade-offs involved and preparing thoughtfully, entrepreneurs can choose a funding path that supports sustainable growth rather than short-term pressure.
For many founders, the most effective strategy is not chasing every available option, but selecting the one that aligns best with where their business is today and where they want it to go next.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |