Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Apr 28, 2026 | NCFA Insight | AI, Fintech And Productivity

AI Image: Jobs vs Compute
AI layoffs are becoming a capital allocation story. In April 2026, large firms across technology, retail, media, and financial services kept cutting roles while at the same time spending more on AI, automation, cloud infrastructure, and operating efficiency.
That doesn’t mean all layoffs are as a result of AI, but boards are asking a harder question now as they divert capital from labour to compute: where does the next dollar produce more output, people, platforms, or compute?
The numbers are getting harder to ignore. Big Tech AI spending could reach about $600 billion in 2026. Meta plans to cut about 10% of its workforce while guiding to $115 billion to $135 billion in capital spending driven largely by AI infrastructure. Microsoft is offering a voluntary employee buyout as it manages rising AI and cloud costs. Snap is cutting about 16% of full time staff. Nike is cutting about 1,400 jobs, with technology roles taking most of the impact.
The decision has been made in the boardroom. AI investment is competing with payroll, product teams, operations, and layers of management. Every job and role now has to show where it adds judgment, customer trust, regulatory knowledge, risk control, or revenue that automation can’t easily replace.
A fintech that can process more volume and scale without adding the same number of people has a better margin story. A fintech cost structure that needs a new team every time revenue grows will be under pressure fast.
AI usage and early labour strain is already appearing before every company announces formal cuts. Entry level roles in AI exposed fields are tightening first. That’s where the next generation of operators and compliance talent usually starts.
A recent Armstrong Economics commentary on AI costs raises a useful counterpoint: AI can reduce headcount pressure, but it doesn't remove cost. For example, the cost of compute, vendor fees, data cleanup, cybersecurity, audit trails, , human review and workflow redesign are all part of real ROI calculations. For fintechs and financial institutions, the acid test is whether the full process costs less, runs faster, and keeps risk under control.
That makes unit economics more important than AI headlines. If those metrics improve, AI is creating operating leverage. If they don't, the company may end up moving cost from payroll to infrastructure in the end.
Nike may be a clearer signal for Canada than Meta. Canada has fewer Meta sized AI infrastructure bets, but it has many established firms that added apps, data projects, digital teams, and customer platforms during the low rate years. Some of that work created real value. Some became expensive to maintain, hard to scale, or too slow to justify.
As a result, many companies are replacing older internal builds with leaner AI enabled stacks, vendor platforms, and automation tools that reduce operating cost. That’s the opening for fintech infrastructure. Companies still need modern payments, identity, credit, fraud controls, compliance tools, treasury, and customer finance.
They just don't want every capability built and staffed internally. Easier said than done but the option is goals and motivations are to buy proven tools, connect them faster, and reduce cost without adding another large costly operating layer. It’s removing friction from financial workflows. Faster onboarding. Cleaner risk checks. Less manual reconciliation. Better fraud detection. More useful cash flow data. Compliance that costs less to run.
The economics are are already visible. AI agents and return on intelligence in finance shows that 77% of financial institutions report positive ROI from AI, while nearly half plan to allocate more than half of their AI budgets to agent driven systems.
Productivity gains are now the baseline expectation, not the upside case. That changes how financial services teams are built and what gets funded.
There are limits, though. If companies eliminate too many junior roles, they risk weakening the talent pipeline. Financial services can’t automate accountability (can they?). Someone still needs to understand the customer, the regulation, and the risk.
Founders and investors should monitor operating metrics to understand where leverage is. Revenue per employee. Gross margin. Onboarding cost. Support cost. Compliance cost per customer. Fraud loss rates. A fintech that grows without adding headcount at the same pace stands out. One that talks about AI without showing better unit economics doesn’t.
Canada is earlier in this cycle, but the friction is starting to show. Statistics Canada reports that about 6% of AI adopting businesses say they've reduced employment due to AI, which suggests the adjustment is underway but not yet widespread. Firms are not always announcing large AI driven layoffs (publicly), but they are slowing hiring, tightening teams, and pushing more output through automation.
That pressure is also showing up in large Canadian incumbents, even when AI isn't named as the cause. Rogers is offering voluntary departure packages to about half of its workforce as it looks to reduce costs.
Canada also won’t follow the US pattern exactly. The country has fewer hyper-scaleup companies and less direct exposure to massive domestic AI infrastructure spending. Canadian companies are more likely to buy AI capability through partners than build it internally. That creates a different risk. The US may adjust faster. Canada may carry this margin and efficiency friction longer.
It's important because productivity remains a concern. Statistics Canada reports that business labour productivity declined in late 2025.
The labour story is not about pure job cuts but whose rebuilding their operating model and productivity structure. If large US firms trade headcount for compute, Canadian firms need to trade manual work and fragmented systems for better infrastructure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
April 28, 2026

Clean water is one of those things people assume is handled in the background – until the tap starts smelling like a pool, the kettle fills with scale, or a boil-water advisory hits the news. That’s usually when the search for a reliable water treatment company begins, and it becomes obvious fast that not every outfit in this space deserves access to your main supply line.
The right water treatment company is not just a vendor. It becomes part of the building’s infrastructure, shaping what everyone drinks, cooks with, showers in, and feeds to equipment worth thousands. Choosing on price alone, or after one flashy demo at the kitchen table, is how homeowners and businesses end up with oversized systems, locked-in contracts, and almost no real improvement in water quality.
Here’s how to narrow the field without needing to become a chemist.
Any serious conversation about treatment should begin with: what’s actually in the water?
Before talking gear, look for a company that:
They should be able to show hardness, iron, manganese, pH, TDS, maybe specific metals or nitrates depending on the region. Then they should calmly explain what’s aesthetic (taste, staining, soap scum) and what’s a potential health concern.
If someone walks in and pushes the same big package they sold to “everyone in the area” without even asking for a sample, that’s not expertise. That’s inventory they’re trying to move.
A water system is plumbing and, often, electrical work tied directly into your main supply. This is not side-hustle territory.
A credible company will have:
Ask directly. Legitimate firms are used to those questions and have no problem answering them. Evasive answers here are a reason to stop the conversation.
Brand names and shiny housings don’t mean much if the guts haven’t been independently tested.
Questions worth asking:
A solid company answers simply and specifically. “This whole-house filter is certified to reduce chlorine and sediment to X level. For lead, you’d need this additional stage at the kitchen tap.” That kind of clarity shows they understand both the limits and strengths of their gear.
When explanations drift into “energizing” water, altering “structure” without data, or miracle magnets, it’s time to be skeptical.

Water testing can be a tool or a weapon. The difference is tone.
Reliable providers:
Watch out for:
If the entire conversation is built on panic and urgency, it’s probably not being driven by your best interests.
A water system has two price tags: the installation, and the long-term cost of keeping it running.
A good quote will:
Ask what a typical year of ownership looks like. How many cartridges? How often does media need to be changed or tanks serviced? Can simple filters be swapped by staff, or does everything require a technician?
High-pressure “today only” discounts, financing pushed harder than the technical discussion, or vague answers about future costs are all signs to slow down.
Performance depends as much on installation as on brand. The most advanced system will underperform if someone rushes it in a corner and leaves.
A reliable company will:
On support, ask:
If everything is smooth until the contract is signed and vague after that, expect trouble later.
Online reviews can be noisy, but patterns are useful.
Look for:
Then ask for a couple of references, ideally with similar water (city vs well) and similar building type (home, restaurant, plant). A quick call to a past customer asking, “Would you hire them again?” is more valuable than any brochure.
Commercial sites have more at stake: compliance, process reliability, and brand reputation.
For a business, a water treatment provider should also:
Here, the right partner behaves almost like a utility consultant, not just an equipment installer.
A few behaviours consistently predict regret later:
When something feels off in the first meeting, it usually doesn’t improve after money changes hands.
Choosing a water treatment company is less about filters and tanks and more about trust, clarity, and long-term thinking. Get those right, and water goes back to being what it should be in a home or business: reliable, unremarkable, and safe enough that nobody has to think twice before taking a sip.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
April 27, 2026

The growing anticipation surrounding SpaceX reflects a broader shift in how investors evaluate high-impact private companies approaching potential public listings. Unlike traditional IPO candidates, SpaceX operates at the intersection of advanced aerospace engineering, satellite communications, and long-term space infrastructure development. This evolving landscape has significantly increased interest in SpaceX stock, positioning it as a focal point for forward-looking investment discussions. This positions it uniquely within capital markets, where valuation is not solely driven by current financial disclosures but by projected industry dominance and technological scalability. As discussions around a possible IPO intensify, investors are increasingly focused on measurable indicators that signal readiness for public market entry.
This blog explores the key signals that investors analyze when assessing IPO preparedness, offering a structured and professional perspective tailored to informed financial evaluation.
One of the most critical indicators investors monitor is the evolution of financial transparency within the organization. For a company transitioning toward public markets, the shift from selective disclosure to structured, standardized reporting is essential. In the context of SpaceX stock, this involves the gradual alignment of financial practices with public market expectations, including detailed revenue segmentation, cost structures, and forward-looking guidance. Investors closely observe whether the company begins adopting reporting frameworks similar to publicly traded peers, even before an official filing. This includes clarity on recurring revenue streams such as satellite services, as well as capital expenditure patterns linked to launch infrastructure and research initiatives. Transparency not only builds investor confidence but also reduces perceived risk associated with limited visibility.
A company demonstrating consistent, disciplined financial communication signals readiness for broader market participation, as it reflects internal maturity and preparedness for regulatory scrutiny. This transformation is often incremental, yet highly indicative of IPO intent.
Operational scalability plays a decisive role in determining whether a company can sustain the demands of public market expectations. Investors evaluating SpaceX stock focus on how effectively the company expands its core operations while maintaining efficiency and reliability. This includes launch frequency, mission success rates, and the ability to scale satellite deployment without compromising quality or timelines. Equally important is revenue diversification. A company heavily reliant on a single income stream may face valuation volatility, whereas diversified revenue sources provide stability and resilience. In SpaceX’s case, the integration of satellite internet services alongside launch operations represents a strategic effort to broaden its financial base.
Investors analyze how these segments contribute to overall revenue and whether they demonstrate sustainable growth trajectories. Scalability combined with diversification indicates that the company is not only growing but doing so in a structured and balanced manner. This reinforces confidence in its ability to perform consistently under the scrutiny of public investors.
A transition toward an IPO requires a robust governance framework that aligns with regulatory standards and investor expectations. Investors closely examine the composition of leadership teams, board independence, and decision-making transparency when assessing IPO readiness. For a company like SpaceX, strengthening governance structures signals a shift from founder-driven agility to institutional accountability. This does not diminish innovation but ensures that strategic decisions are supported by oversight mechanisms suitable for public markets. Key indicators include the appointment of independent directors, the establishment of audit and compliance committees, and the implementation of clear reporting hierarchies. These elements demonstrate that the company is preparing to operate within a regulated environment where accountability is paramount.
Strong governance reassures investors that risks are managed systematically and that leadership decisions are aligned with long-term shareholder value. This structural evolution is often subtle but serves as a powerful signal of readiness for broader market participation.
Capital efficiency is another defining factor in evaluating IPO readiness. Investors assess how effectively a company utilizes its funding to generate sustainable growth. In the case of SpaceX, this involves analyzing how capital raised through private funding rounds is deployed across research, infrastructure, and operational expansion. Efficient capital allocation indicates disciplined management and reduces concerns about excessive cash burn. Additionally, investors monitor the company’s funding strategy, particularly whether it begins transitioning from reliance on private capital to preparing for public fundraising mechanisms. This includes optimizing cost structures, improving margins, and demonstrating a clear pathway to profitability.
A company that balances innovation with financial discipline is more likely to attract long-term investors in public markets. Capital efficiency also reflects the organization’s ability to scale without compromising financial stability, a critical requirement for sustaining investor confidence post-listing. These indicators collectively shape perceptions of financial readiness and strategic alignment.
Regulatory preparedness is a fundamental requirement for any company considering a public listing. Investors analyze how well the organization aligns with compliance standards, disclosure requirements, and legal frameworks governing public markets. This includes readiness for filing documentation, adherence to international operational regulations, and the ability to manage cross-border business complexities. For SpaceX, operating across multiple jurisdictions adds an additional layer of scrutiny. Investors also evaluate how the company positions itself within the competitive landscape, particularly in terms of market dominance and strategic partnerships. A strong market position enhances IPO appeal, as it signals long-term growth potential and industry leadership.
Regulatory alignment combined with strategic positioning ensures that the company is not only compliant but also competitive in a global context. These factors collectively influence how investors perceive the timing and viability of a potential public offering, making them essential components of IPO readiness analysis.
Assessing IPO readiness requires a multidimensional approach that extends beyond surface-level financial metrics. The case of SpaceX stock illustrates how investors evaluate a combination of transparency, operational strength, governance maturity, capital discipline, and regulatory alignment before forming expectations about a potential listing.
Each of these indicators provides insight into how well the company can transition into a publicly traded environment while maintaining its growth trajectory. As interest continues to build, informed analysis becomes essential for separating speculation from measurable progress.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
April 27, 2026

Image: Unsplash/Sortter
Interest rates can cause drastic changes in the real estate markets, as seen in 2025. Among this market, the luxury market in the US with its waterfront mansions, and a strong neighbourhood is affected the most. Buyers are making ultra-sensitive decisions more than ever. However, it is also noted that in 2026, the luxury industry has both potential and hardships.
Luxurious homes are usually financed through big loans, construction loans, or bridge financing systems. Broader rates are a problem here. But buyers are still strict about looking for high-quality homes for privacy, amenities, and locations, and for an overall premium product that delivers higher profit. Uprising rates can change the market environment, but also create opportunities driven by higher demand.
Rates are not swinging wildly anymore. 2026 has stable, measured interest rates compared to the previous change in the rate environment. Buyers are still very conscious about budgets and purchase decisions, trying to gain a competitive advantage in the market. When they invest huge time and effort, being careful is expected.
For developers, the case is even harder because they tend to borrow at every level of the project. It affects land acquisition, permissions, material acquisition, labour cost, and design. In the matter of buyers, mortgage terms are affected by the monthly carrying costs.
Luxury constructions, which depend on loans and bridge financing, are impacted by increasing margins and rising borrowing costs. In fewer instances, buyers compromise on the back square footage, finish of the housing, or delay in groundbreaking the property. According to Lake Geneva Area Realty, Americans are leaning towards renting single-family houses instead of directly buying them to gain long-term benefits. This strategy helps them avoid the property tax, maintenance costs, and repairs.
The higher rates are a warning to owners of luxury construction who have not been owning newer properties that have delayed resale capacity. The bottom line is that when the market has a higher rate, the financial case for luxury households becomes straightforward.
Rising rates affect not only properties but also construction costs. Financing is exclusive and developers have a lag period of time to figure out labour and materials. But the financial realities have to be matched to the practical situation, however strong the design concept.
Luxury buyers have become more selective in this age, instead of rushing to make a purchase decision. Previously, properties were counted as trophies. Now, features like price, long-term benefits, and amenities have become a point of question. Second-home buyers are another layer of selective investors who want nothing but properties with financial benefits despite elevated rates.
A portion of buyers are waiting desperately for rates to fall. They are delaying commitment to big renovation projects or custom builds. Many are drawn towards homes that are already built, so they can avoid the longer duration and financial complexities. The market is currently dominated by ready-to-move-in luxury homes.
Luxury has a value now that is more precious than before: flexibility, easy ownership, and lower friction. Buyers want to get rid of the burden of repairs and maintenance and stay well-adjusted with the changing rates. Luxury is active but remains more value-conscious with time.
Developers are structuring their projects more strategically than ever. Given the current rate situation, they are opting for predictable demands and smaller, targeted developments. They are catering to a specific profile of buyers, for instance, affluent downsizers, second-home buyers, and moving professionals.
Some builders are strategizing differently. They are digging deep into phased construction, more deposit requirements, and pre-sales, so that they can mitigate their risks in bigger projects. They are strict with the timelines and monitor their calendar now and then, since extra months mean more financial pressure. Putting themselves into a renter’s shoes, buyers are looking into homes with lower maintenance and projects with energy-efficient systems.

Image: Unsplash/paws_and_prints
There are regional variations in coping with the rising interest rates as well. Some regions have strong local wealth and limited land supply, while others rely on second-home buyers. In the Midwest of the US, luxury markets are still thriving because buyers are into long-term value. In Lake Geneva, domestic demand, beautiful surroundings, and a stable reputation have kept the market steady.
On the contrary, coastal side resorts are facing shifts in demand since there are plenty of options. In these regions, a modest change in rates can change the overall environment overnight. The outcome is more imbalanced when in a luxury construction landscape. Here, markets stay resilient while others become more cautious.
Developers and buyers who keep track of the interest rates and their changing environment, and who can predict the pattern, win. Amid hardships, they manage to find homes that are not defined by their size, but its quality and location. They further invest in homes that are easy to own with a lesser burden of maintenance and taxes. Luxury is shifting its formats in this economy. Short-term trends are long gone. Buyers want beauty with convenience that stays well-preserved for ages.
The luxury market witnesses a shortage in labour, supply chains, and regulations as interest rates rise exponentially. Skilled trades are in demand to remain under budget, while supply chain shifts material pricing and delivery routines. Regulations become stricter with permissions and rigidity in review. In this case, homes with all the approval papers remain in high demand.
The change in interest rate has driven a change in the operation of the luxury construction sector. Buyers are cautious, developers are selective, and markets are more resilient. The luxury sector now values long-term appeal. Buyers and builders can only adapt to the changing environment. In 2026, winners are those who look for homes that are easy to acquire, own, and justify. Stability meets a strong lifestyle, and that is smart in a constantly changing market.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Apr 27, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Payments And Market Infrastructure

On Apr 17 2026, XTM announced a court approved sale process for its assets and business operations, including the EveryDay Payments platform. The process starts on Apr 27 2026, and binding offers are due by Jun 8 2026 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern.
This is not a routine restructuring. XTM built payment infrastructure for real time payroll, tip payouts, and earned wage access. Its 2024 results showed $800M in payments to hospitality sector employees, $9.1M in revenue, 34% revenue growth, 689 new business locations, and more than 3,500 onboarded locations at year end. But that growth didn't translate into resilience.
On Mar 2 2026, XTM said it sought CCAA protection after operating in a financially strained position since inception and using restricted cash for operating expenses. The company disclosed an $18.75M trust shortfall as of Sep 30 2025. Trading in the company’s common shares remains halted on the CSE since March 2.
The Bank of Canada also stepped in. On Feb 27 2026, the Bank issued a revised temporary order that allowed XTM to restart limited retail payment activity under the supervision of the court appointed monitor and subject to conditions. XTM then restarted the EveryDay Payments platform on Mar 20 2026, with merchants resuming same day tip disbursements to employees.
The sale process adds a new layer. The court approved a SISP on Apr 10 2026 and approved a stalking horse agreement with Pateno Payments Inc., The court also approved a starting offer that sets a floor price for the business. Other buyers can now submit higher bids, which will determine whether the platform is recapitalized, sold, or broken up.
There's a direct operator lesson here. Vertical payment rails can grow fast and still fail if fund protection, liquidity discipline, and operating controls don't keep pace. Tip payout and earned wage access products are close to workers’ cash flow. When that infrastructure breaks, the issue isn't just shareholder value, but merchant trust, employee access to pay, regulator confidence, and a platform's survival are all on the table.
This raises the standard bar for Canadian fintech payment operations. Faster payouts are useful, but the money has to be handled properly. Funds need to be kept separate, records need to match, bank responsibilities need to be clear, and there has to be enough cash to handle problems. Growth does not matter if people stop trusting the system.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
About NCFA Canada | Craig Asano | April 24, 2026

Shael Weinreb is Founder and Chief Executive Officer of The Home Equity Partners, where he oversees all aspects of the business with a focus on corporate strategy, capital partnerships, and value creation. He brings more than 15 years of experience across real estate development, investment, and operations. Prior to founding HEQ, Shael held executive roles at Republic Developments and Starlight Investments. He also served as President and Chief Operating Officer at Freed Developments, where he led corporate strategy, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, sales, reporting, and marketing. Shael began his career in law on Bay Street before moving into in-house roles within real estate development firms. He holds an LLB from Queen’s University Faculty of Law and an Honours Bachelor of Arts from University of Guelph. He is active in several community organizations and charitable initiatives, and enjoys spending time with his family and friends, travelling, and exploring all the wonderful experiences that Toronto has to offer.
In this episode of Fintech Fridays, Craig Asano sits down with Shael Weinreb, Founder and CEO of The Home Equity Partners, to unpack a financing gap that hits many Canadian homeowners hard. Shael explains how HEQ’s Home Equity Sharing Agreement (HESA) gives homeowners another way to access equity without taking on a traditional loan, monthly interest payments, or the pressure that comes with a refinancing decision. He also shares the personal story that sparked the business after his father, despite holding substantial home equity, could not access the funds he needed through a bank.
The conversation goes beyond product basics. Shael breaks down how the HESA model works in practice, where it may fit better than a HELOC or reverse mortgage, and why education remains one of the biggest challenges when introducing a new financial category to the market. He also talks candidly about founder pressure, resistance to innovation, and why he believes Canadians need more choice as rigid lending practices leave too many homeowners stuck between valuable assets and weak cash flow. Enjoy!!
Duration: 53 mins
Intro: Welcome to fintech Friday's a weekly podcast brought to you by the National Crowdfunding and Fintech Association of Canada and partners. Covering all things fintech, blockchain, AI and alternative finance.
[00:00:35] Craig Asano: Hello, everyone. My name's Craig Asano, the Founder and CEO of NCFA Canada, the National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association of Canada, welcoming you to Season 4, Episode 64 of Fintech Fridays. It's a weekly podcast brought to you by NCFA and Partners, where we sit down with incredible people in the fintech and funding community, talk about their journeys, their projects, innovations, milestones as well as trends and developments, all from their perspective. So today, we have a fantastic guest with us. I'd like to introduce Shael Weinreb. He's the Founder and CEO of The Home Equity Partners, otherwise known as HEQ for Home Equity.
He's responsible for managing all aspects of the business, with his particular focus on corporate strategy, capital partners, and value creation. He brings 15 years real estate experience, and he's held executive roles at Republic Developments and Starlight Investments.
He's also served as the president and COO, or the operating officer, so he's got operating experience at Freed Developments. He holds a law degree from Queen's University Faculty of Law, and a BA from Guelph. So Shael, thanks so much for joining us today.
[00:01:47] Shael Weinreb: Thank you so much for having me. I'm really happy to be here.
[00:01:50] Craig Asano: I always love the bios. I always wonder how it makes the founders feel.
[00:01:57] Shael Weinreb: Yeah.
[00:01:58] Craig Asano: Welcome to the show. We're looking forward to this. I've dabbled in real estate myself, believe it or not, over the years. So I'm particularly interested in the conversation and learning more about everything we're going to go through today. So just to kick things off, for anyone who hasn't actually heard of HEQ, or The Home Equity Partners, what does HEQ do and what problem is it solving for Canadian homeowners?
[00:02:28] Shael Weinreb: Yeah. So, the Home Equity Partners is really designed to offer an alternative solution for homeowners to access equity in their home. So up until recently, there's been a handful of ways and most of those products are debt related products.
So, if somebody has built up a sufficient amount of equity in their home through paying down their mortgage and generally paying down their mortgage and sort of being a responsible homeowner the products, to the extent that they want to pull equity out of their house, they've really been limited to things like a HELOC, a refinancing where they're upping their mortgage in some cases, if you're 55 or older, a reverse mortgage, and in some extreme cases, really selling your home.
So in some cases, people might have a $150,000 problem, but because they can't access credit from an institution, they have to sell a $2 million asset to deal with a $150,000 problem.
And that can be really unfortunate. So the Home Equity Partners is really a model that is replicated in some ways based on the success that it has had in the US. It has been around for probably the better part of 20 years in the United States.
You know, and when I look at it, and how sort of popular it has become over the last number of years, and how many families it's been able to help across the US, I saw a lot of parallels between what was happening there and what was happening here, and we decided to be able to offer the same product to Canadian homeowners, the same way that US homeowners have had the benefit of over, like I say, the last almost quarter of a century. And so it's really designed to provide a different way for homeowners to think about how they access built-up equity in their home.
[00:04:17] Craig Asano: Fantastic. It's another one of these stories where Canada's years, if not decades, behind some of these innovations. So thank you for bringing these solutions to market.
[00:04:30] Shael Weinreb: Absolutely.
[00:04:30] Craig Asano: So one of the things we do on the Fintech Fridays podcast, we always dig into a little bit about the founder's story, a bit more on the background. So if you don't mind, just for the audience, sharing a bit about your background of what led you to launch The Home Equity Partners. What has that first year experience been like? Have you crossed any milestones? In preparing for the podcast, I came across a press release that talked about $11 million in shared equity value now.
So that's a good segue into a little bit more about you, Shael, and really, as a founder and what that experience in the first year has been like right up to today, in terms of a timeline.
[00:05:15] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, I think it's a great question. Listen, I mean, I think I knew from a relatively early age that I wanted to become sort of an entrepreneur or in the business world. And as I got older, I started to sort of go back and forth between law, and really becoming a lawyer based on some legal shows that I watched. And I sort of watched a lot of the action in the courtrooms on television with shows like Suits, LA Law, and so on.
And I thought there was something really cool about being able to be a litigation lawyer, and be able to go into a courtroom and formulate an argument for a client that was in need of some representation, and to really help sort of fight the fight, I guess you could say. And so I had a bit of an identity crisis. I knew I wanted to go to university, so I ended up at Guelph, like you said. I graduated with an honours degree in criminal justice and public policy.
And I said, "Even if I don't want to become a lawyer for the rest of my life," I always figured that a law degree would be a really great education, and would serve me well in the corporate world, assuming that I wanted to try my hand at entrepreneurship. So I went to Queen's University Faculty of Law, like you said, graduated, worked on Bay Street for a number of years, and then left private practice on Bay Street, and I transitioned into in-house corporate kind of roles, like in-house legal roles for a couple different companies. So that... And, these were real estate development companies.
So I could learn about real estate, and I could continue on as a practicing lawyer. So I would provide legal advice to those companies.
And then ultimately, when I was working for a company called Freed Developments, like you said a few years into my employment there, I was promoted from in-house counsel to chief operating officer, and then eventually promoted again to president and chief operating officer. And that was really the first time in my career, and that probably goes back to 2019, I would say, that was really the first time my career where I could start really making business decisions.
And really, even though I had a boss that I was accountable to, I certainly had a lot of influence, and I really liked the action that came along with making important decisions and living with those outcomes, and coming up with strategies to sort of arrive at the most successful outcomes that we thought were possible.
And with that taste, as president and COO of the company, I knew for sure that I wanted to see what I was capable of doing in my own sort of business. So I stuck around in real estate development for the next number of years, and while I was working for Republic Developments, like you said, and Starlight, somewhere in the back of my mind, I started sort of experimenting in my head with different ideas. I was looking around the world at maybe some inspiration for what other countries were doing in different areas, and then ultimately, it was really based on personal circumstance.
And I've, I've actually said this before, but my father, just in 30 seconds, my father was very sort of equity rich, cash poor. And so he had a house in the GTA. House was worth about two million dollars. He had a $100,000 mortgage on the property, so he had about a $1.9 million equity position in his home.
He went to the Bank of Nova Scotia, where he had banked for over 40 years, and said, "Listen, I'm 80 years old. I have a pretty substantial equity position at my home. I'm not liquid. I don't really have other assets at this time, and I really need $100,000 to deal with a problem." And the bank said no. They took it to their underwriting team and they said no. And at 80 years old, when you've only banked at one institution your entire life, if they shut you out, you have no idea where to go. Sort of, to me, the alternative lending universe is very complicated.
There's some good ones, you know, there's some bad ones. There's some predatory lenders, there's some loan to own lenders, you know, but there's some really great ones as well. But I think for the average person who doesn't really know much about the industry, it can become a really scary place.
And what I really discovered was that, you know, through some of my own research, I figured that there had to be a better way. And what I mean by that is not just kind of taking out like a second mortgage with a high coupon and then have a one year term attached to it and have to figure out a way to pay it back. And so I looked at the United States, like I said.
I found this concept of a home equity sharing program, and I said to myself, "My dad can't be the only one in the GTA that's going through this." You know, because of restrictive lending practices that a lot of these institutions have in place there have to be a lot of otherwise qualified people who are being shut out every day by the only lender that they've ever known.
So we want to be able to provide sort of a soft landing for them with our product, and not only provide a soft landing with more sort of flexible criteria, but a very different way of thinking about how you take out home equity, and in some ways, a much more friendly way, instead of taking out loans at high interest rates. So that was the inspiration behind the company.
It was really, I think the flick the switch went off in my head through my dad's experience, and then the motivation was to try and help other people like my father, you know, really across this country eventually to help people be able to deal with their financial problems and have some disposable income that they can live on. I think that's the greatest motivational impetus we'll say for, for launching a business. I mean, it resonated with me. I think everyone...
[00:10:45] Craig Asano: Well, my father's 84 too, so every situation's a little bit unique, but I absolutely get it. But the fact that it's been in the US for so long and it hasn't been here and it's brand new, we'll call it sort of like a new financial product. It's a new financial category in some way.
[00:11:16] Craig Asano: Have you run into a lot of challenges and pushback from some of the folks that you're working with or what sort of lessons and insights you might have for other founders? Because we do have founders, we have investors listening to podcast that might be worth sharing at this point in terms of what you're trying to do, because I think it's important for everybody.
[00:11:43] Shael Weinreb: Yeah. So, it's very interesting. Like, what I've learned is starting a business from scratch is hard enough, let alone start a completely new category that's really never existed before. And this is a category that plays to people's emotions because, in many cases, their home is their biggest asset and there's lots of financial disclosure that has to take place before you can qualify for the product. Similar to, like, a mortgage application, but you're giving your debts, your assets. There's a level of trust there.
And so for a lot of people when it comes to home and finances, people are particularly passionate and paranoid, rightfully so. And dealing with a group like ours, the Home Equity Partners, who's been around for a year with a brand new product that nobody's ever heard of, it's an obstacle. it's certainly an obstacle and there is pushback.
And what we often get is that we are compared to reverse mortgages. And why are we compared to reverse mortgages? Because with our product, there are no interest payments for up to 10 years, and I think one of one features of a reverse mortgage is no interest payments. So once people hear no interest payments, automatically, they revert back to reverse mortgages. Our products couldn't be any more different, other than the fact that there is no interest payment, but in our sense, there really is no interest payment.
In their case, there are no cash payments every month, but there is interest on a reverse mortgage, but it simply accrues behind the scenes. the interest meter is theoretically running 365 days a year, 24 hours a day, but you're just generally not out of pocket every month where you're forking over the $400 a month interest payment.
Instead, it's accruing and tabulated at the end of every year. So if you take out 100 grand at the end of the year, you do have a $7,000 interest bill, but you're just not out of pocket on it every month, and then it compounds every year. So that's, that's been something that we've really had to kind of focus on is distinguishing between our product and a reverse mortgage, because sometimes they get lumped in together. And then just education in our product is really the most important thing for us right now is making sure people understand why this product makes sense and get them to believe in it the way that we believe in it.
[00:14:03] Craig Asano: Well, this is perfect segue into let's try to break down that education here of what's known as a HESA, the Home Equity Sharing Agreement.
[00:14:14] Craig Asano: For those listening for the first time what are the mechanics, like, from a homeowner's perspective? How does it actually work?
[00:14:23] Shael Weinreb: Yeah. So, high level, the maximum investment that we'll make in any one house is $500,000. So the upper limit is 500,000, the minimum investment from a dollar perspective is $50,000. So that's number one. $500,000 on the high end, $50,000 on the low end. Number two, we invest anywhere between five to 17.5% of the value of one's home. Five to 17.5%. So if the home, as an example, is worth a million dollars, gets appraised a million dollars, we will cut a check to the homeowner for anywhere between $50,000 all the way up to $175,000.
So 50,000 being 5% of the value of one's home, all the way up to 175,000, or 17.5% of the value of the home, and anywhere in between. So those are kind of like our goal posts, 5% to 17.5%. So let's say, hypothetically, you have a house that's a million dollars. Okay? And you came to me and you said, "You know what? I want a HESA," which is a Home Equity Sharing Agreement.
We would look at your file, we would look at your application. And let's say, hypothetically, you qualified for 10% of the value of your home based on the appraised value, which is $100,000. 10% of a million is 100,000. So fine. So you would get the $100,000. There'd be an application fee of 3.9% that we would take off the top, that would come off as a disbursement on closing, and you as the homeowner would be responsible for the legals and title insurance and the appraisal fee. So there's a handful of disbursements on closing. The net goes to you. It's a one time fee of 3.9%. There's no renewals. You have the money for 10 years.
It's an up front payment. We don't, we don't sort of enforce another payment along the way. There's no disposition fee. It's just a one time fee to us for the decade that you have the money for. Now, going back to what I was saying.
So you take out a 10% position, or $100,000, the idea is how do you arrive at the profit split? Meaning, moving forward, to the extent that your house rises in value, how much does the Home Equity Partners receive and how much does the homeowner receive, or you receive? What we do is we apply a four multiplier, or a four multiple, to whatever the percentage amount is that we invest. So in other words, if we invest or take a 10% position, we would be entitled to 40% in any change in value moving forward during the duration of our relationship. So because you took 10% of the value of the home. We simply multiply that 10 by 4, we arrive at 40%.
So that means 40% for us, 60% for you. Had you said to me, "Shael, I need 5% to the value of my home," at a million dollars, which is $50,000, we would take 20% of any future change in value. You, as the homeowner, would retain 80%. So five times four.
So whether it's five times four, six times four, seven times four, eight times four, nine times four, and so on, all the way up to 17.5%, times four. So whatever that number is, that really determines the profit split. So that's how you come up with that particular part of the program. The other thing that I should mention is that we discount the value of the house. So if the house gets appraised by a million dollars, we discount the value of the house by 5% on day one, meaning that allows us to arrive at what's called the starting value.
So if your appraised house comes at a million, for our internal purposes, it, the real starting value is $950,000. So we'll give you the $100,000 based on the million, and the 10% is based on the million. But to establish the starting line, we discount it by 5%, so it's $950,000. And we do that for a number of reasons.
The most important of which is that what we can't have happen is we, you know, you come to us with $100,000. We give you the $100,000. The house is appraised a million. Nine months later, you call me up, you say, "You know what, Shael? I want to pay you back the $100,000." We re-appraise your house in nine months. In all likelihood, it's still a million dollars, and therefore, you get the 100 grand for free for nine months. That can't be the way that we run our business. That's not fair to our investors. That's, that, we can't be in business that way.
So our product is really designed to be for homeowners who really want to hold on to the product for probably three years and longer. If, if it's kind of like a quick in and a quick out, and you really want to be in it for, like, 8 to 12 months, based on that 5% discount, it probably doesn't make sense. It becomes really expensive.
But if this is something that you're using to kind of continue to remain in your home for the next five to seven years before you downsize, or you have a mortgage, and now your mortgage payments are significantly higher because of the mortgage renewal kind of wave that has occurred over the last number of months and moving forward. This gives you the opportunity to create, like, an extra fund, effectively, to make up for that shortfall so that your cash flow isn't impacted for renovations, and you want to live in your home, but you want to renovate or do some updates to your home.
So there's lots of use cases. One of the cases that we've seen is even a divorce, where husband and wife break up. Husband wants to buy wife out of the property, but doesn't have the funds to be able to do that.
So the husband came to us for a six-figure number to be able to buy his wife out of the home. And now, they'll be able to keep the family home, which is great, and, you know, sort of the wife moves on. And in the absence of having our product, they would have had to sell the home, and that wasn't what he wanted to do. He wanted to sort of continue to remain there. Especially with kids, it can become challenging in not having to sort of uproot them, so we could be a great solution for that.
So, lots of different use cases where our product could be applicable, but I think, just to repeat myself, 5 to 17.5%, minimum $50,000 investment, upper limit, $500,000. Whatever the percentage amount is, we multiply it by four to arrive at what our share is versus the homeowner's share. And then we simply discount the starting value by 5%, or the appraised value by 5%.
Those are really the key kind of mechanics to the program.
[00:20:53] Craig Asano: That settlement period, though, you mentioned with a couple of the use cases. I don't know if it was the divorce, but it was, it may not make sense if it's within, say, three year or five-year.
[00:21:05] Craig Asano: You're looking more long-term. That settlement period, is it not fixed or agreed, or it's flexible based on the use case?
[00:21:15] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, no. listen, I mean, there's no, there's no handcuffs to the program. You can exit at any time you want. You can call me tomorrow. Like, you can take the investment today and call me tomorrow. The, what we're trying... discourage people from doing, is taking out money for the short term because of that 5% discount. Like I say, if, if you could find that money elsewhere at 5%, you're probably better off that way, to be 100% honest with you. But the other sort of part to the program is we will actually participate in a loss with you. So how does that happen?
So going back to the million dollar example, there's two situations, really, that we will participate in a loss. One, there's a three year blackout period. So for the first three years of the program, we will not participate in the loss with you. We are going to hold you to that million dollar number. So even in year two, if you sell your house for $830,000 after year two, we're still going to hold you down to that million, we're going to hold you to that million dollar number. So you're responsible for that million dollar number for the first three years. After three years, we will start participating in the loss with you.
So how does that work? You have to sell your property. You can't buy us out of the loss. So in other words, if in year five, we enter into a massive recession, housing prices have plummeted, your house has now dropped from a million dollars to $600,000, you can't be opportunistic, call us up and say, "You know what? I have a bunch of money on hand. The house has now plummeted in value. I want to buy you out of the loss." You have to crystallize that loss by selling your home and effectively standing by that with us, not just by buying us out.
The second way in which we'll participate in a loss is if the full 10 years, you've been with us for the full 10 years of the program, and your house is worth less in 10 years than it was on day one. So those are the two ways that we really participate in a loss. So three years has to expire from the commencement date of the program, and then you have to sell your house to crystallize that loss with us, or you have to wait the full 10 years. But we will participate in a loss. So, even in my dad's example, my dad sold his house in 2022 at the height of the market.
Had he taken out a reverse mortgage at that time to stay in the home, effectively what would have happened over the last four years is that the reverse mortgage would have eroded his equity in the house, because, as interest accrues. So that's really eating away at the existing equity that you have. And then he's also experienced market depreciation over the last four years. That same house that was worth 1.9 and change would, could, could easily be worth 1.7 now.
So he'd be down $200,000 on market depreciation, and he would also be down tens of thousands of dollars in interest, if not at sort of like maybe the $100,000 mark. So he would have experienced substantial loss. On the flip side, with our product, had he gone into a HESA with us, and he sold his house after year three like he did, and he experienced a loss, we would have participated in that loss with him. So as, as painful as the depreciation was, he wouldn't have had the added kicker of a $100,000 interest bill. Because with us, there is no interest. We simply win when you win as the homeowner.
We make no money if the homeowner doesn't make money. So we're completely aligned, unlike lenders that are not aligned. All they really care about, obviously, is making sure that they get paid back their principal loan and they get their interest every month. So my dad would have been much further ahead with a program like ours than a reverse mortgage.
[00:24:52] Craig Asano: Yeah, for, for sure they're only interested in making that payment. You could, you might get one free missed payment, otherwise your phone's going to be going off the hook. I can already envision we're going to need a follow-up to go through the spreadsheets, to go through. I think if, if you can talk to the differences between some of the options, I think that would be beneficial for someone who's been introduced to it for the first time, and sort of looking at their use case to seeing where it might fit, which product in the market might fit. So HELOCs versus the reverse mortgage, which you kind of touched upon.
[00:25:43] Craig Asano: Where do you see, from your experience dealing with homeowners today, and how your product compares with the options? What are the fundamental difference from that homeowner's perspective? I'd be just Is it an easy thing to summarize? Yeah?
[00:26:01] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, sure. I mean, when you look at the reverse mortgage, there's a couple of things that really stand out. One, you have to be 55 and older. So that's number one. So there's no age restrictions with our product. Number two, their loan to values are generally much more conservative than ours. We are prepared to go up to 75% loan to value, whereas I think at the absolute maximum, a reverse mortgage will go up to 59% loan to value. And they do that from like sort of an actuarial perspective, because they never want to be in a position where effectively the house runs out of equity, right?
So if you live up until a certain age, and if the interest meter keeps running, theoretically, they can put themselves in a position where the interest has exceeded the amount of equity in the property. So they're very sure not to do that.
So our loan to values are generally much higher, so people can qualify for more money with our product than you can with a reverse mortgage. And like I said we're aligned with the homeowner, where, like I said it's very much about profit participation instead of focusing on loan and interest. The other thing with a reverse mortgage, too, is that if you have an existing first mortgage, they will never go in second position. So if you have an existing first mortgage with an RBC or TD of the world they are going to insist to pay out your existing first mortgage. And what could that do?
That could trigger a prepayment penalty... that could trigger a much higher interest rate than the coupon that the homeowner currently has with their day-to-day lender.
So they will never go in second position, so you have be prepared to take out money from them to pay out your first mortgage, which could, like I say, could trigger additional fees and a higher interest rate. As far as traditional products go, it really comes down to cash flow, and it really comes down to your appetite for risk. I mean, if you have a lot of disposable income and you can afford the monthly payments associated with a loan, that's fine. That's, there's an opportunity for that.
I'm not suggesting that we're taking over the entire home equity market and we're, like, an all-in-one solution for everybody and we're far better than every other product. That's not the case. There, there's going to be pros and cons of every product.
And so, with our product, you have to stomach risk to a certain degree, because if your house skyrockets in value, naturally our product could become really expensive, right? Do we see it over the next couple years, where house prices are going to skyrocket? No, we don't. Is it important to sort of keep an eye on what's happening? I think so. But we, what we try to do every year with homeowners is really provide sort of, like, as much transparency as possible. So as a homeowner, what you're going to have is you're going to have your own portal, and we're going to tell you every year approximately what your house is worth.
So if you gave us a house at a million dollars on day one and we gave you $100,000 investment and that helps you arrive at, like, sort of a profit split, we have technology that's going to say in year two that your house is maybe worth a million 20 now based on comps in the neighbourhood or whatever. So now your total exposure to us has gone slightly up. In year three, again, these are just approximates, we don't know definitively, but in year three, your house could be worth a million 10, and therefore your exposure to us has gone down, right? It's less expensive in year three than it was in year two.
So we're going to do our best to make sure that after year 10, if you stay with us that long, there's no sticker shock. We don't want to catch anybody by surprise.
We want to over communicate with homeowners to make sure that they understand along the journey exactly what their exposure is and how it all works. There's no games. There's no hidden surprises. That's not what we're doing. we're trying to run a fully transparent operation. We give homeowners a homeowner guide at the beginning to make sure that they review everything and understand the way our policies work.
So with us, you need to stomach a little bit of risk if you think that your house is going to go up, but I think with a line of credit, you also have to be able to expect that there's going to be interest rate fluctuations. So right now, interest rates are relatively low, and everybody sort of has a different interest rate. Like some people have prime plus 2% or 3% or 4%, depending on kind of what status level you are at the bank.
But if interest rates go up, then obviously the cost to borrow becomes more expensive too. So there isn't a product that's perfect. I think it really depends on what your needs are, and if cash flow is paramount to you, I would argue that we're a really great alternative to a loan where it's only going to sort of erode your cash flow even more, whereas with us, you don't have a single payment for a decade.
[00:30:55] Craig Asano: That sounds like music to my ears cash flow. Well, looking at this, it has been very transparent. I think that's excellent information. I mean, obviously there's a lot of details. It comes down to the contract, comes down to the meetings. But from what you've seen with the $11 million in built-up home equity share value at HEQ, what is, like, the top two, three use cases, and then maybe one or two, where is it not suitably aligned to a homeowner's situation? If we can just... Because I think that would just summarize...
And this is in the conditions of the market, current real estate market over the next few years. Nobody has a crystal ball, but let's, you know, basically those are the parameters, and what do you think, who should be coming to speak to basically HEQ two or three use cases, and then really who should not?
And I think, that's sort of like an acid test, a starting point for people to determine, should we go talk to Shael?
[00:31:56] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, no, it's a, it's a great question. So I think for people that come to us and the couple use cases, like you said, are really people in one case, well, in, in more than one case, people that have accumulated a lot of debt. Credit cards, CRA arrears, property tax arrears, people that are credit-impaired, that really sort of can't qualify for a traditional loan even if they'd like to. But I think when you, when you come to us and you're, you know And there's no shame in it. It happens to everybody, right? Like, the cost of living is extremely expensive.
The income tax system that we have here in this country is incredibly high and probably some of the most punitive, I think amongst various places around the world. Everything that we buy has to have HST on it, so everything that you buy is subject to 13% sales tax, and then you have property taxes.
Like, for the average person, you're not really putting much money in your pocket. By the time you pay for a car and a mortgage and insurance and some gasoline and some groceries, there's not a lot left over. So there's no shame in, having sort of a cash flow shortage. And so if you, if you get yourself into a position where your credit cards are starting to get maxed out and you're starting to fall behind on a number of payments, obviously one, your credit score goes, goes down substantially, so your, your ability to borrow moving forward is impacted by that.
And by coming to us, there's going to be an overall cost to the product, assuming that your house goes up, but you can't look at that in isolation. What you also have to consider is the cost savings by paying all of those things off.
So we, for all our homeowners, will model effectively what the cost of our product is, and the two driving kind of levers for what our cost of our product is obviously one is time, how long you hold the product, and then two, what happens to your property over time. Those are the two main levers that's going to determine the overall cost. And we have a bunch of sensitivity analysis, three year, five-year, seven-year and 10 year terms, and then 3%, 4%, 5% appreciation rates, or whatever it is. And that helps you to arrive at an overall cost. So there's going to be a cost if your house goes up.
But like I said, you also have to think about, one, peace of mind, and two, the fact that now you don't have those 20% interest payments on your credit card anymore. And now your credit score is going to start to slowly but surely start to come up.
And then maybe in a few years from now, once you can have an ability to start borrowing again at maybe a more conventional institution, if that's what your comfort level is, then you can start to do that.
So I would say it's people that are sort of starting to fall behind financially, and then people that are just seniors that really do want to stretch their time in their home and they can use our HESA money almost as like a quasi-pension, where they can really live off it Because many people are retiring today without pensions and they can really live off it, and it allows them, based on whatever fixed income they have, to supplement that with our product. And now they can comfortably go out for dinner.
They can comfortably maybe take a trip once a year to a warmer climate during the colder months. They can more comfortably pay their mortgage if they need to.
They can more comfortably maybe help their kids or grandkids with a little bit of help or financial assistance. So we're starting to see more seniors look to it, look to us, and the product is, like I say a reward, in my view, for having built Been able to build up that equity through sort of a lower interest rate environment for a number of years and really sort of paying down your mortgage every month. So I would say those are kind of the two use cases that I see more and more in terms of people that are really looking to us for the product.
And as far as people that should potentially stay away from the product, truthfully, just people that really want to be in it for, like, a year or two.
Like I said before, with that discount of 5% and not really knowing where right real estate prices are going over the next year or two, it can become expensive and certainly far more expensive than taking out a 5% credit line, if they can qualify for that. So I think if, if you're really in it for, call it a minimum of 30 to 36 months and beyond, I think we start to become very attractive.
But if you're looking at it for 8 to 12 months because you need to settle, like, a short term obligation, then you want to get out in 12 months would encourage you to sort of look around and compare our product to other products that might be available
[00:36:27] Craig Asano: Yeah. No, that's excellent.
[00:36:30] Craig Asano: And thanks for breaking it down with levers and all the product details. And just, I think the use cases help, because everybody feels the pinch, like you're saying, that the costs are expensive. It doesn't matter your situation. And I really like the idea that there's no shame. it's Financial services like that, people, sharing their files, sharing their credit information they, they, they worry, they fear. But the worst fears could be alleviated with some of these new products, and they're definitely worth looking at as an option. So one Yeah.
I wondered as you're talking, are you operating nationally or just here in Ontario today?
[00:37:11] Shael Weinreb: So right now, we're operating only in Ontario. I would say that our primary focus is the GTA. We have made exceptions outside of the GTA. We're starting to look actually out west as a consideration. nothing's been formalized yet, but there's some opportunities that are starting to percolate out west, so that's a consideration for us, but the goal is eventually to become national, for sure. At the end of the day, there is going to be so much innovation in this space, because it's gotten to a point where our lending practices are so rigid and so conservative, and it's not a bad thing in some cases.
Like when they did the stress tests back in 2008 when you sort of had the whole financial crisis and they stress tested all the banks in the US versus the way that we stress test here with our deposits and whatever. Like, I think our banks back in 2008 proved to be on stable financial footing.
I think what it proved in the US is that many banks were not on the stable financial footing. So I think, presumably, Canadian banks have been able to maintain that by being very selective with who they work with. And so, there has to be a lot of innovation, because there's tens of billions. Across the country, there's hundreds of billions, but in Ontario, there's tens of billions of dollars of people that are sitting on equity in their homes.
And when they look at their bank accounts, in some cases they're on overdraft, or in some cases, they're living paycheck-to-paycheck, or in some cases, they're racking up debt, or whatever have you. And, as we all know, you can't swipe your house when paying for groceries.
So, I'm starting to see more innovation now in the space, and I think what you're going to see is even more, because I think the days of just lending as we know it, there's a place for that, there's no question, but there's certainly a real opportunity for a lot of disruption in this space to allow homeowners different ways or alternative scenarios to really take advantage of the equity that they've built up in their house. and we obviously think that we're a great way to be able to do that, but over the coming years, you're going to see a lot more innovation in the space. And I welcome it.
From a personal perspective with my dad and other people that are struggling, there should be more innovation. It shouldn't just be about lending and collecting interest.
There should be a lot of different ways and some kind of interesting and smart ways for people to take money out from their home, and the US is doing it, and we're really proud, in our view, to be at sort of the front lines in respect to this space, and we expect to be able to help thousands and thousands of people across this country over the coming years.
[00:39:48] Craig Asano: No, I think it's fantastic. Like, just touching upon this idea of innovation in a category, and from what you're seeing right on that front line, over the next three to five years, where do you see it going? And is is it product structuring? Is it more partnerships, more capital being provided? Is it some type of regulatory changes in the lending sector, or is or is it all the technology? Are we going to have an AI come in and do everything for us like, what do you see? what is on your mind?
[00:40:22] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, like, I think it's sort of a combination of things that you just mentioned, for sure. I don't see banks necessarily pulling back in terms of their lending practices. Like, I just don't see that happening, so I think banks are going to be what they're going to be. I think it's more about sort of entrepreneurialism and people trying to get innovative in the space and really introduce new categories that are maybe being done around other parts of the world, and really using that as inspiration to bring it to Canada and maybe ways that have just never even been thought of before.
But I think there's a real opportunity for smart people who like this space and recognize that there's a real need for it, to start examining areas for people to take on that, you know, to take on sort of new initiatives to access that equity.
People should have choice, people should really have choice, and I think that's one of the great things about a free marketplace, that people should have choice. And so I'm really looking forward to seeing what's coming. I'm starting to see it already.
There's a credit card that certain people can qualify for, and I won't even hurt my business by saying this, but regardless I think there's a credit card now that people can qualify for people that are 55 and older where it's a prepaid credit card for $100,000 or something like that, and you can use it when you go out, and you can buy things on this credit card, and naturally, you just draw down on the balance as you go. But the interesting component to it is that they register a mortgage against your property as security for that credit card.
And so, as security for that credit card, because there's a mortgage, the interest rate comes down substantially.
So you still pay interest, but instead of paying 20%, you're now paying 7%, because the credit card company has a mortgage on your property, so that if you default or it doesn't get paid, theoretically, they have the rights and remedies that any mortgage holder would have. But now there's a new credit card that you can take out and, like I said, instead of 20%, you're now only paying 6%. So it functions like a credit card.
[00:42:33] Craig Asano: Yeah.
[00:42:34] Shael Weinreb: So it's interesting. There's other things that I'm starting to hear about, so I'm, I'm really excited to see what happens in this space, because I think Canadians are deserving of as much choice as possible, and let them decide what's best for them.
[00:42:43] Craig Asano: Absolutely. It's really based on need, and it's going to drive that entrepreneurial innovation, like, like you're talking about. From your founder's perspective and, we're getting here to the nitty gritty part of the podcast, I'd say because we've heard a lot. I think it's fantastic. But from your perspective, what does success look like for HEQ, maybe one or three years from now from what you've experienced in, in one year, some, some great milestones being on that front line? So where do you see success? How do you define it for HEQ in the future?
[00:43:21] Shael Weinreb: Honestly, I just define it as being able to help people. Like, I'm not looking at it as, in terms of, like, dollars and cents. I'm looking at it as an ability to scale, and really to become integrated into the fabric of home equity choices. Like, right now, we're sort of, like, on the outside looking in. We're certainly not part of the mainstream right now, but ultimately, I think all we're looking for is to be considered as an alternative to some of the other products out there. So, we want to be in the discussion, and I think we're working like hell to be part of the discussion.
And so, without a massive marketing budget and a massive team, we really have to get creative in terms of how we get the word out there as best as possible. So that, to me, is really success, that in two, three years from now, somebody says, "Oh, a HESA?
I've heard of that," or, "Oh, the Home Equity Partners? I've, I've heard of them. They seem to be doing really good work," or, "I went on their website, and I saw seven testimonials from homeowners who really explained why the product was particularly helpful to them, and how we solved some of their problems." That, to me, is really what success looks like.
[00:44:26] Craig Asano: Yeah, fantastic, and we'll at NCFA here, we'll do our best to play a small part in educating folks, and maybe driving some traffic to those that have a real need. So, you're, you're doing great work. So, I guess this brings us to the part of the podcast where we call it rapid fire questions. So, we're not looking for long answers. We're talking one or two, two words here. So I think the idea is just to kind of catch you off guard a little bit with some of these questions, and see how you respond.
[00:45:00] Shael Weinreb: Sure.
[00:45:00] Craig Asano: Are you ready for those?
[00:45:01] Shael Weinreb: Absolutely.
[00:45:02] Craig Asano: Okay.
[00:45:03] Shael Weinreb: Bring it on.
[00:45:03] Craig Asano: I've got them written down here. So, what's one belief that you have about money or homeownership that you think people would disagree with?
[00:45:15] Shael Weinreb: That it's a right.
[00:45:18] Craig Asano: That's a right? What?
[00:45:20] Shael Weinreb: That it's a right, that, like, homeownership, I guess, what I'm trying to say is, like I'm trying to stick it to, like, one word or whatever, or two words, but that it's a right. It's, in my view, people see homeownership as this right that they should have as a citizen of this country. I think it's something that more and more is not automatic. It's something that happens to certain people, but you're starting to see a lot more rental communities pop up.
And I think when you really look at the numbers, depending on the stock market as an example versus homeownership, in many ways, like the S&P has outperformed home prices over the last number of years. So, I guess, one, homeownership is not necessarily an automatic right. It's not something that you're entitled to. It's something that you have to work towards.
And then, number two is, people I think, sometimes are under this mistaken belief that, "If I buy a house and pay down my mortgage, that by the time I retire, I'm going to be okay, and that I can always use my house as, like, a piggy bank." In some cases, there might be better investment opportunities. You might be better off renting and putting your money elsewhere. Owning a home and maintaining a home, and with all the expenses and insurance and property taxes and headaches, it's not for everybody. So, I think before you really think about getting into home, you have to make sure it's right for you.
[00:46:50] Craig Asano: It's the scary truth. Going to keep it to homes, but okay. That was more than two.
[00:47:00] Shael Weinreb: Sorry, that was a bit longer than you would have wanted. I apologize.
[00:47:04] Craig Asano: So, moving on. What's something that you learned in your first year of building HEQ that you did not expect to happen?
[00:47:09] Shael Weinreb: Honestly, I didn't expect resistance in any way. I thought investors would gravitate to it immediately, and once we announced it, I thought homeowners would be lining up around the corner for this product. But as I've learned, it doesn't really happen that way. Anything new, any change seems to be a barrier, and so it requires education.
[00:47:31] Craig Asano: That's absolutely critical. So good answer. So, what's a decision that you've made as a founder that turned out to be better than you thought?
[00:47:43] Shael Weinreb: I was honestly scared of the pressure a little bit of having to grow something from scratch, and really be primarily responsible for introducing this new category in the home equity space. But what I discovered is I actually welcome the pressure. I really do. I welcome the pressure, I welcome the challenge, and I welcome the chance every day to wake up and really try to bring this product to as many people as possible. And are there setbacks along the way? Absolutely. Do I enjoy and am I welcoming the pressure and the challenge more than I thought I would? Absolutely.
So that's been a really positive experience that I didn't really necessarily expect. But overall, it's been, it's been a really positive experience.
[00:48:30] Craig Asano: Fantastic. Last rapid fire question. What's a piece of advice that you'd give to someone who feels house rich, but cash constrained?
[00:48:41] Shael Weinreb: Right. That there's options. And I think if you look deep enough, and especially with this new product that we're offering, there's lots of options out there, and you don't have to feel stuck. There are a lot of different sort of ways that you can go about it. But I think it's important to speak to people. Doing nothing is the worst option. Staying stuck and doing nothing and feeling paralyzed is the worst thing that you can do. Speak to a financial advisor. Speak to your accountant. Speak to friends, speak to family. Spend some time on the internet. Use ChatGPT or Claude, or whatever the latest AI tool is.
But to just do nothing, I think is really doing yourself a disservice. And I think it's important that you put some effort in to try and figure out ways that you can unlock it. Because you're starting to see way more options in the market, and I think there's a solution for most problems.
[00:49:32] Craig Asano: No, that's right. Keeping your head in the sand is not a solution to a very painful problem. I mean, the pressure that folks have with debt and rising costs, it just continues to grow. And homeownership, as you've alluded to several times, it can become not just costly, but complicated. So you have to always be in market, take a look what's out there in between sort of government doing their role, new ventures who are creating these new categories, new products, like yourself, they have their part. And the incumbent institutions for their type of customer, they have their own way to participate.
So hopefully collectively we'll all be getting through this together. But,
[00:50:16] Shael Weinreb: Absolutely.
[00:50:18] Craig Asano: No, that's fantastic. I just wanted to as we move into closing here, like if anyone wants to get in touch with you, Shael how do they? Do you have an email? Like what's the website? Can you Whether they're an investor, whether they're a homeowner, or someone who just wants to talk to you about the innovation side, how do, how do people contact you?
[00:50:36] Shael Weinreb: Yeah, I appreciate you asking that. So our website is www.theheqpartners.com. I think we have a general email inbox, which is info@theheqpartners.com. There's also a submit question component to our website. But I can be reached anytime at sweinreb@theheqpartners.com. And I'm around for any questions from homeowners. I'm always available to chat, and just kind of walk through different scenarios and do whatever I can to help. That's really my goal.
[00:51:21] Craig Asano: And if you don't mind, we'll make sure those details are in the transcript and show notes.
[00:51:28] Shael Weinreb: Thank you.
[00:51:30] Craig Asano: That's fantastic. So if anyone has any questions about home equity sharing, the HESA agreement, or what's happening in terms of these new options in the market, you really have to talk to HEQ Partners. This is Shael Weinreb. So Shael, thanks so much for joining me today, sitting down, sharing your valuable time, your knowledge, expertise. I thought it was fantastic. I learned a lot. I'm sure a lot of our listeners have too. So really appreciate your time, and wish you all the best in what you're doing.
Maybe we'll sit down for one of those more detailed spreadsheet webinar versions of the nitty gritty with the percentages and the cost structures. But I think you laid it out very transparently and provided a lot of education. Enough for people to make the decision, "Let's go talk to Shael." So that's fantastic. So for everyone else, that's going to be a wrap.
If you're new to Fintech Fridays, just want to encourage you to check out some of our incredible past episodes, because I think you'll be surprised with what you find. We look forward to seeing you next Friday for another episode of Fintech Fridays. So Shael, since this will be going out tomorrow, on Friday, I want to wish you a great weekend. And again, have best of luck in the coming years.
[00:52:49] Shael Weinreb: Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. And thank you for having me again.
Outro : you've been listening to Fintech Fridays brought to you by NCFA and partners. Tune in weekly for the latest fintech Friday podcast by subscribing to this channel. The National crowdfunding and Fintech Association of Canada is a non-profit actively engaged with social and investment fintech sectors around the globe and provide education research industry stewardship services and networking opportunities to thousands of members and subscribers. For more information please visit ncfacanada.org.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |