Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Apr 15, 2026 | NCFA Feature | SME Finance And Alternative Funding

In its April 2026 report on IP backed finance in Europe, the European Union Intellectual Property Office puts scale behind a problem that reaches well beyond Europe. IP intensive industries account for about 48% of EU GDP and around 31% of employment, yet the financing system still struggles to turn that asset base into lending and growth capital.
The report puts the EU SME credit gap at up to EUR 365 billion a year, with EUR 70-150 billion tied to IP rich firms (IPR).
Modern growth depends on intangible assets, while most lending systems still prefer hard collateral. It says better valuation, disclosure, and risk sharing could unlock EUR 30-120 billion annually.
Firms that own and use IP tend to perform better, attract more capital, and scale faster.
EUIPO and EPO research cited in the report finds that IPR active SMEs are 21% more likely to go through a growth period and 10% more likely to become high growth firms.
The same body of research finds that companies with registered IPRs generate 41% more revenue per employee than non owners, with the advantage rising to 44% for SMEs.
Another report finding says startups with a patent or trademark filing have 2.6 times higher odds of winning seed funding than peers without filings. In this context, IP is less about a legal and and more a financing story.
Canada already understands that IP matters, but now the issue is execution. Can banks, investors, valuation experts, founders, and policymakers use IP in a consistent and trusted way when companies need capital to commercialize and scale?
IP doesn't behave like ordinary collateral.
It is hard to compare, hard to price, and often hard to separate from the company that creates value from it.
Secondary markets remain thin. Recovery paths remain uncertain.
Financial statements often fail to show the full picture. Valuations cost too much for many smaller firms.
Transaction data remains sparse. Lenders respond the way lenders usually do when information stays patchy. They get conservative, apply steep discounts, or walk away.
That diagnosis fits Canada more than many people admit. Canada talks about commercialization, productivity, scale up capital, and keeping more firms anchored at home.
Those goals all get harder when a company’s most valuable assets sit in code, data, patents, brands, know how, and proprietary processes, but the financing system still wants equipment, real estate, and receivables.
WIPO’s Canada country perspective on IP backed financing says Canada has already implemented dedicated IP backed lending programs that have provided significant funding to IP rich firms since 2020.
The country also built support around strategy and capability. ElevateIP helps startups and scaling firms build IP strategy earlier in their life cycle. The Patent Collective Program continues to receive federal support proposals that aim to strengthen specialized IP support for SMEs.
That said, Canada still looks early when viewed as a full financing system.
Even the clearest dedicated lending example has narrowed. BDC Capital’s IP backed financing page now says the fund is closed to new investments and directs companies toward its Growth and Transition Capital team instead. That doesn't erase progress, but it underlines a sticky truth holding us back.
Canada has ideas, pilots, and support programs but it still needs stronger financing systems to support IP.
The EUIPO report lays out five priorities that deserve attention in Canada too.
1. Make IP visible. Companies need a practical way to disclose IP and related intangible assets so lenders and investors can actually assess them.
2. Assign credible value. That means valuation standards, trained experts, and methods that smaller firms can afford.
3. Leverage that value into lending. Risk sharing tools, guarantees, and insurance can help lenders move before the market has decades of recovery data.
4. Build the evidence base. Without transaction history, default data, recovery data, and clearer benchmarking, every deal stays bespoke and every lender stays cautious.
5. Reinforce coordination. The system only works when policy, valuation, finance, legal frameworks, and founder education line up.
None of that sounds flashy (or new to some extent) but it's important. Great financing markets often depend on boring infrastructure that people barely notice once it works. Canada has already made progress on IP awareness. The harder job now is to make IP finance repeatable, cheaper, and easier to trust.
Canada wants stronger productivity, more domestic scale ups, better commercialization, and more globally competitive firms. Those ambitions run straight into the financing problem the report describes.
If a company builds real value through software, data, designs, patents, and brands, but still cannot turn that value into growth capital on workable terms, the economy leaves a lot of productive capacity stranded. Some firms slow down. Some dilute too early. Some sell too early. Some move.
That is why the policy question has changed. Canada needs more practical answers on valuation, underwriting, recovery, disclosure, and coordination. It needs more evidence on what works. It needs more institutions that can bridge the gap between legal ownership and financeable value.
Europe’s new report doesn't hand Canada a turnkey model, but it does offer something useful. It shows the size of the opportunity, names the bottlenecks clearly, and lays out the missing pieces of a functioning market. For Canadian founders, lenders, and policymakers, that is the real takeaway. The challenge is no longer awareness. The challenge is building the tools that turn IP into capital.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Apr 10, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Regulation And Policy, Risk Compliance And Regtech

On March 31, 2026, the UK Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum published a foresight paper on the future of agentic AI. It offers one of the clearest regulatory reads yet on where agentic AI is heading as it moves into consumer tasks, enterprise workflows, and regulatory supervision.
The paper draws a clear line between systems that respond and systems that act. Agentic AI can plan, pull data, use tools, and carry out actions such as making payments on a user’s behalf. Once AI moves into real workflows, the focus shifts fast to consent, accountability, cybersecurity, consumer protection, and competition. That lines up with wider NCFA analysis of AI governance gaps and the cost of weak controls once software starts operating inside regulated systems.
Everyday life admin is one of the clearest use cases. Instead of bouncing across websites, forms, logins, and support queues, a user can ask an agent to sort bills, renew a policy, or book a trip. That turns software into a delegation layer between the customer and the market.
Three benefits stand out.
Lower search costs. Agents can turn simple requests into structured comparisons across providers and calculate total cost including fees.
Better deal discovery. They can monitor prices, surface better options, and apply savings automatically.
Easier switching and cancellation. They can pre-populate forms, track deadlines, and maintain records of consent.
For users facing access barriers, including disability or language constraints, these systems could also expand participation and accessibility. But that upside depends on trust. As NCFA noted in user backlash over AI data use, convenience can disappear quickly when people no longer understand how their data is being used or who controls it.
Companies can use agentic AI across customer facing work and internal operations.
On the customer side, agents can handle support requests, guide onboarding, process refunds, and complete routine tasks before sending more complex cases to staff.
Inside the business, they can pull information from multiple systems, draft reports, create follow ups, route approvals, and take care of repetitive work that usually eats up time.
The report includes real data. A large study of AI in customer support found productivity gains of about 14% to 15% in issues resolved per hour, with the biggest improvements among less experienced staff. A UK Government Digital Service trial across 20,000 staff reported average time savings of 26 minutes per day.
These aren’t fully agentic systems, but they help explain why firms are moving in that direction.
There’s also a concrete example from Allianz. The company built a system using seven AI agents to automate food spoilage insurance claims. The agents pull evidence from multiple sources and work together on a single case.
That matters because it shows where agentic AI is likely to land first in regulated industries. Not in open ended autonomy, but in tightly defined workflows where speed, documentation, and consistency matter. It also supports NCFA’s earlier view on which fintech processes are most ready for agentic AI.
The DRCF isn’t only asking how to regulate agents. It’s also looking at how regulators can use them.
AI can help detect issues, review large volumes of documents, support analysis, and assist with drafting. The Competition and Markets Authority already uses AI tools to detect bid rigging linked to more than £300 billion in UK public procurement each year. The CMA has also deployed agentic AI to detect consumer harms like drip pricing at scale.
That matters for regulated finance. Once supervisors and watchdogs use AI to monitor conduct and review journeys, firms will need stronger controls, clearer evidence trails, and more reliable oversight. NCFA’s recent review of what regulated AI needs points in the same direction.
AI doesn’t just change the market. It changes how the market is watched.

The same features that make agentic AI useful also create new pressure points.
Accountability gets harder. Multiple agents, tools, and providers can operate inside one workflow. When something breaks, responsibility can be difficult to trace.
Action bundling raises the stakes. A simple request can trigger multiple steps at once, including data access, consent, payment, and sharing. Users may not fully understand what they handed over or when control returns to them. That risk is especially relevant in finance, where NCFA recently looked at how AI payments challenge consent rules and liability.
As agents take over comparison and decision making, users may rely on rankings they can’t see. If those rankings reflect platform incentives or partnerships, outcomes can change without users realizing it.
That also changes competition. Firms may start competing to be selected by the agent, not by the customer.
Agentic AI can improve defense by helping teams triage threats and respond faster. At the same time, it expands the attack surface.
Prompt injection becomes more serious when agents act on untrusted input. Broad permissions increase exposure. If controls are weak, emails, browsing history, and customer records can be exposed.
A recent attack used agentic AI to carry out 80% to 90% of the attack lifecycle.
That lowers the cost of scale for attackers.
The report also points to emerging ideas like Know Your Agent identity and authorization frameworks as something to watch.
Vendor lock in. As agents become embedded in workflows, firms may depend more heavily on one provider’s infrastructure, data, and orchestration layer. Without strong interoperability, markets could tilt toward a single vendor that captures most outcomes. That concern sits close to NCFA’s argument that smart data infrastructure redefines financial competition.
Algorithmic collusion. Research shows agents can converge on higher prices or coordinated behaviour in controlled settings without being told to do so.
These are experimental findings, not live markets. Still, the warning is clear. Without strong controls, hidden coordination becomes a conduct risk.
The most useful part of this report isn’t prediction. It shows where regulators already expect pressure to build as agentic AI moves into real use. There’s no regulatory gap to wait for. Existing rules already apply. Firms are expected to manage these risks now, not later.
The upside is real. Agentic AI can reduce friction, compress workflows, and lower operating costs across the stack.
But the bigger change is structural. Once systems act, not just suggest, control becomes part of the product. Who authorizes actions, what gets logged, how decisions can be explained, and how users step in or push back all become core features.
That creates a new dividing line. Some firms will bolt agentic AI onto existing systems and hope their controls hold. Others will rebuild around visibility, control, and user trust. The second group will move faster, scale more cleanly, and face fewer problems as scrutiny rises. NCFA’s earlier piece on agentic AI in banking makes the same point from the deployment side.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |