Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Apr 21, 2026 | NCFA Feature | Artificial Intelligence And Data

Apr 21, 2026, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced a criminal investigation into OpenAI and ChatGPT following a Florida State University shooting on Apr 17, bringing AI safeguards, records, and escalation controls into a far more serious legal setting. Prosecutors issued subpoenas for materials tied to safeguards, training, and crime reporting, while AP News reports that investigators reviewing AI chat logs linked to the accused shooter. OpenAI says ChatGPT didn't promote harm and that it's cooperating with law enforcement.
For AI operators, it's no longer a question whether or not AI system can generate harmful responses. Numerous use cases and verified facts are escalating the need for strong governance and requirement to show what AI systems produced, what controls were in place, what records were kept, and what happened when risk appeared.
The Florida case stands on its own, but it also fits into a repeatable pattern that keeps building. When AI interacts with vulnerable users, influences behaviour, or operates in sensitive contexts, accountability expands beyond model output.
That includes minors and mental health. NCFA has already outlined AI protection gaps for youth and trust risks tied to AI psychosis claims. Legal claims tied to chatbot interactions and teen harm are now testing whether platforms owe a duty of care. That question isn't yet settled, but it's now active in courts and regulatory discussions.
Exposure doesn't stop with responses alone. Agentic AI systems that can act on their own are being scrutinized because they are starting to trigger workflows, retrieve data, connect tools, and influence real decisions. That expands the scope beyond what the model says. It now includes what the system does, what it initiates, what it fails to flag, and who owns the outcome.
It also raises a second layer of risk. These systems aren't only acting, but are making judgment calls inside those workflows. NCFA has explored this trend in how AI systems are moving from guardrails to judgment, where deciding outcomes is now part of system behaviour, not just model output.
As these systems connect to money, identity, and operational processes, weak controls become visible fast. Risk exposure moves beyond the prompt interface and into the infrastructure where decisions are made and executed.
The legal system doesn't yet have a stable way to classify AI. Different cases treat it as a tool, a product, or an automated process. That uncertainty affects liability, discoverability, and the standard of care expected from firms.
What investigators ask for is starting to line up across cases. Logs. Escalation triggers. Review steps. Retention policies. Safeguards. These are the records that show how a system behaved and how a firm responded. Recent NCFA coverage on AI chat exposure in court and AI escalation controls under test points to the same pressure area. The Florida probe adds another example. When outcomes are challenged, this is where scrutiny begins.
For founders, executives, and boards, responsibility doesn't stop at model performance. It extends to system design, deployment context, monitoring, and response when risk appears. That includes safeguards, escalation thresholds, human review, and whether systems should act in high risk scenarios at all.
When AI becomes central to operations, governance, oversight, and risk controls that affects diligence and board discussions. Investors with board roles or influence over strategy may face questions about what risks were understood, what controls were expected, and how oversight was exercised.
Investors are not insulated. As AI becomes embedded in core operations, governance and risk controls affect diligence and board oversight. When outcomes are challenged, companies will need to show they anticipated risk, implemented controls, and acted on signals.
Thoughts on mitigation? Systems need clear boundaries. Escalation triggers need to be defined before deployment. Logs need to capture full interaction context. Human review needs clear ownership. Agentic systems need limits on when they can act without intervention.
There are also clear red flags. The situations that will attract scrutiny first.
In the near term, markets should expect more subpoenas, more edge case litigation, and more focus on how AI interactions are recorded and reviewed. Over time, governance will tighten around system level accountability. That includes how decisions are chained, how risk is surfaced, and how AI companies demonstrate that they acted when it mattered.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
April 21, 2026

Image: Pexels
W-2 and 1099 forms filing is one of the least understood areas of running a business.
Get it wrong and the IRS will come after you. Get it right and taxes will be a breeze.
The good news? Once the differences click, it's pretty straightforward.
Both forms report income received during the year. However they are used for very different circumstances.
A W-2 form gets sent to employees. It shows wages earned and all taxes withheld (federal income tax, Social Security, Medicare). The employer automatically withheld those amounts during the year.
A 1099 form is sent to contractors and freelancers. The most familiar one is called a 1099-NEC, which stands for nonemployee compensation. With a 1099 they don't withhold taxes at all. The contractor is responsible for paying it all themselves.
Here's why getting this right matters from day one...
Accuracy is not negotiable when it comes to W-2 and 1099 forms filing. Whether processing just a few contractors or hundreds of employees, this software solution handles the guesswork of generating, filing, and distributing both W-2s and 1099s correctly — freeing up time and eliminating expensive mistakes.
This is where most businesses get tripped up.
The IRS Worker Classification Test evaluates three distinct factors. They are as follows:
If everyone says yes... then that worker is most likely an employee that requires a W-2.
If the worker gets to set their own schedule, uses their own tools and equipment, and gets paid per project... chances are they are an independent contractor that requires a 1099-NEC.
Pretty straightforward, right?
Here are a few quick examples to make it clear:
W-2 employees typically include:
1099 contractors typically include:
With over 36% of the US workforce now freelancing — that's over 70 million Americans — understanding the 1099 side of things has never been more important.
This is the part that catches a lot of people off guard.
When it comes to W-2 employees, the employer handles payroll taxes. This includes withholding federal income tax, state income tax, and paying half of the FICA tax (Social Security and Medicare taxes) while the employee pays the other half.
For 1099 contractors, it is a completely different story.
Taxes aren't automatically withheld from their paycheck. Instead, they pay estimated quarterly taxes directly to the IRS.
What's more, the self-employment tax sits at 15.3% — twice as much as what a W-2 employee pays. Why? Because 1099 workers pay both the employer and employee portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes.
Granted, 1099 workers have one benefit. Many of their work-related expenses are deductible on Schedule C. This includes home office expenses, equipment, software, mileage, etc. These write-offs lower taxable income, partially negating that higher rate.
It balances out for many contractors — but only if they track everything properly.
Missing these deadlines comes with real penalties. So mark the calendar.
January 31 is the IRS deadline for W-2 and 1099-NEC forms.
Here is what needs to happen by that date:
One final 1099-NEC tidbit... File a form for any contractor paid $600 or more. In 2026, the minimum increases to $2,000 per new law. Regardless, keep records of contractor payments all year long — not just January.
Misclassifying workers is not just a paperwork problem. It is a financial one.
Misclassification is taken very seriously by the IRS. When a company willfully misclassifies employees as contractors to evade paying payroll taxes, the penalties stack up fast:
And the IRS typically goes back three years when auditing unpaid employment taxes.
The silver lining? If there is genuine uncertainty about whether a worker is a W-2 employee or a 1099 contractor, businesses can file Form SS-8 and let the IRS make the call.
Staying compliant with W-2 and 1099 forms filing does not have to be stressful.
Here is a simple process to follow:
The biggest mistake businesses make is waiting until January. By January it is a frenzy. Start with a clean system and tax season is a non-event.
When it comes to W-2 and 1099 forms filing, there's really only one question. How is the worker classified?
W-2 employees receive W-2 forms. 1099 contractors receive 1099-NEC forms. The taxes, deadlines, and penalties are entirely different.
To quickly recap what matters most:
Classify properly, stay ahead of deadlines, and implement with the correct toolset. Those are the only things needed to stay clean and compliant year after year.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
April 16, 2026 | NCFA Feature | Regulation and Policy, Banking and Credit

On April 15, 2026, the Toronto Centre and the National Bank of Ukraine signed a cooperation MOU focused on capacity development and financial system resilience. The agreement helps show how financial support for Ukraine is broadening. The first layer focuses on emergency access to money. Another layer now reaches deeper into the system through supervision, cyber defense, risk sharing, and credit support that help institutions keep working under wartime pressure.
Support now goes beyond donations, fee relief, and refugee banking. It also focuses on keeping the financial system stable, protecting infrastructure, and helping businesses access credit during the war.
The first financial response in a war is immediate. People need money to move. Families need funds across borders. Refugees need banking access that works in a new country. In Canada, National Bank of Canada directed $100,000 to the Red Cross Ukraine appeal in February 2022. Scotiabank followed with more than $1 million in relief and resettlement support in March 2022.
Consumer fintechs also supported households directly. Revolut says more than €1 billion has moved to Ukraine through its platform since 2022, and says nearly 700,000 Ukrainians across the UK and EEA rely on its services. That shows where digital finance adds immediate value in a crisis. It lowers friction and helps households stay connected to funds.
Toronto Centre says its agreement with the National Bank of Ukraine is designed to strengthen institutional capacity, organizational resilience, and supervisory effectiveness. Ukraine’s challenge is not only getting money to people quickly. It is also keeping a national financial system stable through repeated shocks.
The same pattern also shows up in financial infrastructure. On March 12, 2026, Mastercard and the National Bank of Ukraine announced cybersecurity cooperation for the financial sector, building on a wider digital country partnership launched with the Government of Ukraine in November 2025. In wartime, this is core infrastructure. Payment systems, bank operations, and trust in digital finance depend on it.
Babak Abbaszadeh, President and CEO, Toronto Centre:
“The conflict in Ukraine is ongoing, and financial stability remains under threat. I am in awe of the dedication and resilience of the National Bank of Ukraine’s staff. Their bravery continues to inspire the global supervisory community. Toronto Centre remains firmly committed to supporting the National Bank of Ukraine, to enable them to remain resilient under severe conditions. We will continue to stand with the bank and provide specialized training and support.”
The clearest evidence that financial support now includes rebuilding sits in credit and risk absorption.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) financing shows how this is working:
Odile Renaud Basso, President of EBRD, says the bank is “lay the foundations for a resilient and sustainable reconstruction.”
International Finance Corporation (IFC) is building similar capacity through bank partnerships:
IFC cites World Bank estimates of $176 billion in direct damage, $589 billion in economic losses, and $524 billion in 10 year reconstruction needs as of December 31, 2024. The gap remains large. The financing architecture is real, even if current flows remain far below total need.
Canada has committed about $722 million in recovery and reconstruction support since 2022, including $216.7 million for an EBRD capital increase tied to Ukraine reconstruction.
Andriy Pyshnyy, Governor, National Bank of Ukraine:
“The situation in my country remains difficult; Ukraine may not be headline news these days, but the brutal war is continuing and threatening financial stability. As our central bank navigates these challenges, the training and technical assistance provided by Toronto Centre plays an important role in strengthening our institution and building financial resilience in Ukraine. We are grateful for Toronto Centre’s ongoing support, and the support of its donors: the Government of Canada, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, and the International Monetary Fund. Signing this MoU deepens our cooperation and helps ensure that Ukraine maintains financial stability during this war.”
Ukraine’s finance story is no longer only about relief. It now includes the harder work of protecting institutions, supporting infrastructure, and keeping credit channels open long enough to support recovery.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Apr 14, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Market Activity | Identity Privacy And Data Governance, Payments And Money Movement

On April 14, 2026, Interac and Kijiji introduce verified identity for marketplace users, bringing Interac Verified solutions into peer to peer transactions. The integration allows Canadians to confirm who they are dealing with before messaging, meeting, or completing a purchase.
Interac connects nearly 300 financial institutions and is used more than 20 million times per day to move money across Canada. Kijiji operates at national reach with more than 4 million live listings and over 1 million new listings added each month. This puts verified identity into a place where millions of transactions happen and trust issues show up most often.
Peer to peer marketplaces have historically relied on ratings and reviews. Those signals describe past behaviour, but they don't confirm identity. Verified identity addresses that gap directly. It confirms that the person behind an account is real before a transaction begins, reducing uncertainty in both high-value categories such as automotive and real estate and in everyday transactions.
Amanda Zeffiro, General Manager, Kijiji Canada:
“Integrating Interac Verified solutions to bring verified identity to Kijiji is how we raise that standard, giving Canadians the confidence to transact with people they’ve never met.”
Interac is rolling this out in stages and keeping identity verification in Canada. People can verify their identity today through participating financial institutions, using systems already trusted for payments. Later this year, a second option will let users verify with government-issued ID and a quick liveness check. This gives people different ways to verify depending on what they are comfortable with and the type of transaction.
Interac’s network already supports a large share of how money moves domestically, and this approach uses that same system for identity. At a time when data control is becoming more important, keeping verification tied to Canadian institutions carries weight with both users and regulators.
The benefits are clear. Verifying identity upfront can reduce impersonation and fraud, especially in higher risk transactions. It can also make people more confident when buying or selling. Over time, this kind of verification can connect more closely with payments and onboarding, giving platforms a more complete way to manage trust across the full transaction.
Interac is extending beyond payments into identity verification at scale. By placing verified identity before the transaction, Interac is positioning itself as part of the trust infrastructure that reduces risk and helps establish trust and therefore who can safely transact.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Apr 13, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime

Anthropic chose not to release Mythos, its latest general purpose LLM model, to the general public.
On April 7 2026, Mythos Preview was placed into a restricted access program under Project Glasswing after internal testing showed the model could identify and exploit zero day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser it tested.
Anthropic is granting controlled access to a small set of approved security researchers and critical infrastructure partners under tightly managed conditions. Project Glasswing brings together technology firms, financial institutions, and open source maintainers to test the model in controlled environments and fix vulnerabilities before wider release.
The technical results explain the decision. Anthropic says Mythos Preview achieved full control flow hijack on 10 fully patched targets, generated working Firefox exploits 181 times, and chained multiple vulnerabilities to escape browser and operating system sandboxes. Yes, these are real world attack paths that hackers could easily exploit if they got their hands on Mythos.
Anthropic, Project Glasswing announcement:
“In the short term, this could be attackers, if frontier labs aren't careful about how they release these models.”
Anthropic says more than 99% of the vulnerabilities it identified are still unpatched. That creates a narrow window where the same capability can either strengthen defenses or increase exposure. Anthropic chose to restrict access rather than release broadly. A leadership and ethics call on when real world cyber risk becomes too high for open distribution.
So now a pattern is forming since on February 26, 2026, Anthropic’s drew another AI red line decision that wouldn't allow the Pentagon to use it's AI systems for two use cases, including mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic isn't walking away from capability but setting limits on when and how these capabilities are deployed.
These red lines run through the model itself in a way. Claude’s 2026 constitution announced the model is moving towards embedded judgment rather than fixed guardrails. Mythos extends that thinking into release strategy. The question is no longer only what the model can do. It is whether it should be released at scale before surrounding systems are ready.
For fintechs and financial institutions building on AI for regulated workflows, frontier AI is not just a productivity tool but also a cyber resilience issue. If models can find and exploit vulnerabilities faster than fixes can be patched and implemented, teams have less time to respond. Companies need to know what software they rely on, who to contact when issues appear, and how quickly they can fix them. Access to powerful AI systems and tools also needs tighter control.
A security pattern is appearing across technologies. Quantum crypto migration is closer to production than originally thought, placing pressure on long standing encryption systems. Mythos is amplifying risk in a different way. It shortens the path from vulnerability discovery to exploit. One weakens encryption durability. The other compresses the defender timeline. Neither risk leaves much room for slow response.
When AI capability moves faster than patch cycles, the decision of who gets access, and when, is now part of cybersecurity strategy.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |