Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: Voices
Honouring Andrew Moor’s Innovation Legacy
Banking | June 25, 2025
Andrew Moor’s Leadership Helped Shape Modern Banking in Canada
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association of Canada (NCFA) is deeply saddened by the sudden passing of Andrew Moor, President and CEO of Equitable Bank, (EQB) over the weekend of June 21–22, 2025 per the Financial post. Moor was a bold and thoughtful leader who believed in making Canada’s financial system more innovative, digital, and inclusive.
See: Why Canada must be open to open banking
As CEO since 2009, Moor led Equitable Bank’s transformation into a technology-forward institution known for its direct-to-consumer offerings and fintech partnerships. EQ Bank, the digital arm of Equitable, became one of Canada’s most trusted alternatives to traditional banking under his leadership. His forward-looking vision earned admiration across the financial sector, including from those of us at NCFA.
A Builder of Progress, Not Just Institutions
Moor supported open banking frameworks, digital infrastructure reform, and meaningful collaborations between regulated banks and emerging fintechs. He served on the board of the Canadian Bankers Association and consistently advocated for innovation that benefits Canadian consumers.
His leadership helped create new paths for collaboration between incumbents and innovators, something that NCFA has long supported.
Closing
Andrew Moor’s contributions advanced financial innovation in Canada. His sudden passing is a loss to all who care about the future of finance, technology, and inclusion. NCFA extends heartfelt condolences to his family, colleagues, and the entire team at EQB.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
Made in China Trump Mobile Is a Fintech Bundling Play
Fintech | June 18, 2025
Image courtesy of Trump Mobile website
Trump Mobile is a Bundled Fintech Strategy Targeting Niche Consumers
On June 18, 2025, Fortune reported that Trump Mobile is entering the U.S. wireless market with a $47.45 per month prepaid plan and a smartphone built by Chinese device maker Unihertz. Beyond the political optics, the announcement is interesting from a fintech perspective since Trump Mobile plans to use a telecom backbone to bundle lifestyle services in a way that mirrors embedded finance strategies seen in a variety of global fintech ecosystems.
See: Trump Media’s Patriot Economy Expands into Fintech
The T1 smartphone is priced at $499 with a $100 down payment, and is scheduled to ship in late summer 2025. Trump Mobile is powered by Patriot Mobile, an MVNO that leases infrastructure from existing carriers. The business model relies on branding and licensing rather than owning physical networks. This setup closely resembles the way fintechs white label financial infrastructure through APIs and software platforms.
Eric Trump, EVP Trump Organization on Trump Media:
“I'm incredibly excited to step into this new digital space, hard-working Americans deserve a wireless service that's affordable, reflects their values, and delivers reliable quality they can count on. We're especially proud to offer free long-distance calling to our military members and their families — because those serving overseas should always be able to stay connected to the people they love back home. ”
47 Plan Includes Telecom and Embedded Services
The flagship product is the “47 Plan” offered at $47.45 per month. According to Trump Mobile’s website, it includes unlimited talk, text, and data, plus international calling. The bundled services also include 24/7 telehealth access and roadside assistance, which are traditionally sold separately or through insurance providers. Packaging them into a single mobile bill is a similar approach of fintech super apps.
See: Does CUSMA Support Fintech Services Across Borders?
The T1 phone has midrange specs: a 6.8-inch AMOLED 120 Hz screen, 12 GB RAM, 256 GB storage, a 50 MP triple camera setup, Android 15, a 5,000 mAh battery with 20 W fast charging, USB-C, a headphone jack, and biometric unlocking. The phone is manufactured by Unihertz in China, despite political framing that implied U.S. manufacturing. It unveils global hardware supplier realities that fintechs face when bringing physical devices to market.
Licensing Mirrors Fintech Platform Strategies
According to The Wall Street Journal, the Trump family licenses its name to Patriot Mobile, which operates the network. This approach is similar to how fintech startups offer debit cards, wallets, and investment tools without becoming licensed financial institutions. The infrastructure is external, but the customer relationship is owned by the brand.
There is also a digital asset component. Reuters reported that Trump Media is applying for a cryptocurrency ETF made up of 75% Bitcoin and 25% Ethereum. Even though the potential crypto ETF isn't directly tied to the phone plan just yet, it highlights the Trump brand's ambition to combine lifestyle, media, and financial products.
Tariffs on a Trump's Chinese Made Phone
Ironic as you get that earlier in 2025, the Trump administration slapped a raft of reciprocal tariffs, including a baseline 20% tariff on Chinese-made consumer electronics. According to Al Jazeera, the administration later exempted certain chips and phones but it's unknown which specific products currently qualify. If the T1 is subject to tariffs, the cost could be absorbed by Unihertz, passed to Patriot Mobile, or used to justify higher retail pricing.
What Canadian Fintechs and Policymakers Can Learn
Trump Mobile offers a live case study in how embedded services can be sold through telecom. For Canadian fintechs, it opens a conversation about how telcos and startups might partner to deliver subscription-based insurance, health care, or financial tools to underserved communities. Packaging multiple services into a mobile plan can improve customer stickiness, adding to predictable revenue, as also seen in bundled offerings by Koho, Neo, and other Canadian fintechs.
See: Robinhood’s WealthTech Push and Lifestyle Finance
There should be policy concerns however, with potential conflicts of interest involving Trump's family ties to regulatory agencies. Also combining telco infrastructure with consumer finance triggers questions around cross-sector regulation, as regulators will need to consider the risks of a converging telco-fintech model as it grows.
In Conclusion
For NCFA members, this launch offers insight into how bundled, cross-platform models can scale quickly with the right partnerships. As Canada expands open banking and explores new models of service delivery in underserved markets, this example shows how telecom-fintech convergence could work, assuming regulators allow it.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Are Finfluencers in Trouble or Just Getting Regulated?
Regulation | June 13, 2025
Image: Freepik/marymarkevich
Regulators Take Action on Unlawful Finfluencers While Advocates Urge Clarity, Fairness and Access
Canadian regulators joined a coordinated global crackdown last week targeting unlawful finfluencers, or social media personalities promoting investments without registration or oversight. While enforcement activity is increasingly in focus, global experts and finfluencer advocates are warning that overly restrictive approaches will harm innovation, reduce access to financial education, and weaken digital financial literacy efforts.
As part of the Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) collaborated with regulators from the UK, Australia, the United Arab Emirates, Italy, and Hong Kong to investigate unlawful influencer activity.
See: The Finfluencer Effect on Canadian Retail Investors
The OSC reviewed 87 finfluencers and 9 issuers that used influencer promotions, and found some were offering unregistered investment advice or sharing misleading content, especially in the crypto sector. In-person warnings, gathering of evidence, and educational outreach were used to prevent retail investors being harmed.
Bonnie Lysyk, Executive Vice President of Enforcement at the OSC:
“International relationships are vital in countering this growing issue. The OSC’s recent research highlights the substantial influence social media personalities have on investor behaviour.”
Promote Compliance Without Silencing Education
In May 2025, the International Organization of Securities Commissions - IOSCO published its final report on finfluencers, to address online retail investor safety. Both the OSC and IOSCO's research on the impact of finfluencers were aligned, highlighting risks such as gamification and how social media and trading platforms can blur the line between general information and regulated investment advice.
See: Emerging Investors: Gen Z Canadians Take the Lead in Global Investment Trends
IOSCO doesn't advocate for bans but rather outlines a series of good practices for regulators, platforms, market intermediaries, and finfluencers:
- Clear disclosures of paid relationships and risks
- Investor education tools
- Proportionate regulatory responses
- Collaborative oversight frameworks
Jean-Paul Servais, Chair of IOSCO and FSMA Belgium:
“These reports set out globally aligned expectations for ethical conduct and effective oversight... ensuring that technology enhances trust, rather than undermining it,”
Finfluencer Advocate Perspective
Not all creators are breaking the rules. According to the CFA Institute’s 2024 finfluencers appeal report, many finfluencers are filling educational gaps and helping demystify investing and financial planning for younger and underserved audiences. They create digestible and accessible content, often without commercial promotion or investment recommendations. Some are careful to include disclaimers and avoid offering specific advice.
See: A Look Inside 2024 DIY Investing Trends in Canada
A Wealth Professional Canada article cited Tangerine survey that discovered 60% of Canadians who follow finfluencers said they had benefited from their content. At the same time, those who acted on influencer tips were found to be 12 times more likely to experience scams.
Advocates argue that regulation should distinguish between financial education and commercial promotion. They are calling for clarity on how to remain compliant, not for the removal of content that informs and empowers.
“Most of us want to educate and uplift. But we need the rules to be clear and fair, not just fear-based.”
How Canada Compares to Global Peers
While Canada takes a proactive, data driven approach to enforcement of finfluencers while increasing public awareness for finfluencer risks, how do we shape up to our peer countries?
In Australia, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission - ASIC released guidance for social media influencers through INFO 269. ASIC warns that creators discussing financial products may be in breach of the law if they are unlicensed and don't follow compliance standards. The guidance supports financial literacy content as long as it avoids over promotion and includes proper disclosures.
In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has focused on financial promotions. The FCA targets firms that pay finfluencers to promote investments without regulatory approval and has updated the financial promotions regime to apply to social media content.
Italy’s CONSOB and other European and Middle Eastern regulators also participated in the coordinated enforcement week. These jurisdictions are enhancing joint oversight of social media investment promotions, especially in the context of crypto and speculative assets.
See: GameStop Testimony: When Short Sellers, Social Media, and Retail Investors Collide
In the United States, regulators such as the SEC and FINRA have pursued enforcement through existing anti-fraud provisions. While there is no finfluencer-specific guidance, recent actions have targeted offside celebrity crypto endorsements and undisclosed paid promotions.
Importantly, none of the major jurisdictions have called for bans, so global consensus is aligning with regulators to build frameworks that promote compliance, transparency, and public awareness instead.
Conclusion
Finfluencers are becoming as influential as traditional advisors, even more so for digitally native and younger investors. So oversight is warranted but the focus should be on compliance that doesn't undermine financial literacy and inclusion. Regulatory consensus shows that with clear rules, good practices, and global cooperation that clear rules and strategic oversight can protect investors while empowering open access to useful financial content online.
Want to stay ahead of regulatory shifts affecting digital finance and investor education? Subscribe to the NCFA newsletter for updates, insights, and expert analysis.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
SEC Considers DeFi With Innovation Safe Harbour
Crypto Policy | June 11, 2025
Image: June 9, 2025 DeFi Crypto Roundtable (Coindesk via youtube)
Atkins and Peirce Back Safe Harbour and Rule Updates to Grow DeFi Responsibly
On June 9, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hosted another crypto task force roundtable series session called, "DeFi and the American Spirit", bringing together together regulators, legal experts, DeFi protocol developers, and investors to discuss how to the potential of regulating decentralized financial systems in ways that protects users without stifling innovation.
See: Bitcoin’s Evolving: The Rise of DeFi on Bitcoin
From the get-go, Chair Paul Atkins set the tone by opening the event by clearly stating that publishing code should not be treated as a crime:
“We will not regulate the act of writing open-source software. We do not prosecute the author of a hammer manual when someone misuses a hammer.”
The rest of the session built on this idea and focused on how the SEC can provide safe ways for DeFi projects to operate legally while still addressing investor risks.
Key Takeaways
1. SEC is Evaluating a New Pathway for DeFi Innovation and Compliance
In his remarks, Chair Atkins introduced the idea of a “conditional exemptive relief framework” which would allow DeFi innovators to build and launch on-chain products under limited conditions without triggering enforcement right away. This type of framework is similar to a regulatory sandbox that provides time-bound relief as long as participants meet specific safeguards.
“We are exploring a conditional exemptive relief framework that would allow experimentation under defined boundaries, similar to an innovation safe harbor.”
See: SEC Clears Crypto Staking. What It Means for Canada
Commissioner Hester Peirce (aka Crypto mom) echoed this sentiment saying without a structured pathways to compliance, many innovators will either operate in legal uncertainty or offshore their projects out of the United States.
“Without a clear, conditional pathway, we are telling innovators you are on your own. That is not a message we want to send if we value the benefits of decentralized systems.”
2. SEC to Modernize Existing Rules for On-Chain Finance
In addition to the DeFi safe harbour, Chair Atkins also called upon his staff to modernize the current SEC rules to accommodate traditional issuers and intermediaries who want to use on-chain infrastructure.
See: Crypto.com Canada Gains Canadian Regulatory Approval
This move shows that the SEC is looking to facilitate both new DeFi entrants and existing market players who are building tokenized products or using smart contracts to manage trading, issuance, or custody.
“I have asked the staff to consider whether amendments to the Commission’s rules and regulations would be better suited to provide needed accommodation for issuers and intermediaries who seek to administer on-chain financial systems.”
3. Acknowledging efficiency, liquidity, and new financial instruments
Atkins also discussed that on-chain systems can bring real benefits to the market, such as lower transaction costs, faster settlement, broader access, and the ability to create entirely new asset classes.
“I also am excited about the use of on-chain software systems by issuers and intermediaries to eliminate economic frictions, increase capital efficiency, enable new types of financial products, and enhance liquidity.”
See: New AI Minister Prioritizes Growth Over Rules
It's clear support and endorsement of blockchain as a tool for economic growth, not just a solution for compliance challenges.
4. Off-chain risks are growing and need better disclosure
Several panelists, including Rebecca Rettig of Polygon Labs, warned that some of the most serious risks in DeFi happen off-chain. These include hidden liquidity deals, token allocations to insiders, or governance control partnerships.
“It is not always what is on-chain that creates the risk. It is often what is not disclosed, like side agreements, control over governance tokens, or preferential liquidity deals.”
Panelists argued that DeFi projects need better disclosure on how protocols are governed, how tokens are distributed, and whether any third parties receive special treatment or not.
5. Rules should follow activity, not labels
Legal and industry experts said regulators should stop focusing on whether a token is a security and start regulating based on what the product or service actually does.
See: UK Publishes Draft Rules for Crypto Regulation
Angela Angelovska-Wilson of DLx Law said:
“We waste enormous energy litigating over whether X token is a security. The better path is regulating the activity, such as staking, custody, or lending, regardless of the label.”
Michael Jordan of the Digital Dollar Foundation agreed, saying:
“If we regulate the technology, someone will build around it. If we regulate the activity, we have a chance at real consumer protection.”
Important to understand the growing consensus that rules should distinguish between different types of financial behaviour even when the technology is similar.
6. Not all interfaces are equal under the law
Josh Garcia of Ketsal pointed out that some interfaces like custodial front ends that take custody of user funds or routes trades on behalf of users may require stricter oversight whereas protocols without admin control may require lighter regulation. Advocating for a layered regulatory approach that differentiates on function and control.
See: Takeaways from the SEC’s Crypto Custody Roundtable
“A protocol with no privileged admin keys is not the same as a custodial front end that routes retail funds. The obligations differ, and so should the rules.”
Outlook
After several Crypto Task force roundtable sessions, the SEC and participants are finally getting on the same page while focusing on conditional exemptions, regulatory modernization, and functional oversight. All together, it's a series effort to balance investor protection with lawful DeFi innovation. For fintech founders and digital asset platforms in Canada and globally, it's an important benchmark. If the U.S. begins providing clear compliance pathways and policy support for tokenized systems, then other jurisdictions will need to keep up or risk flight of builders and capital.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
New AI Minister Prioritizes Growth Over Rules
AI Policy | June 11, 2025
Image: Canada's Minister of AI and Digital Innovation, Solomon Evans Keynote at Canada 2020 event Ottawa (CPAC)
Canada's AI Minister Says Focus is On Scaling, Not Overregulating
Prime Minister Mark Carney recently appointed Solomon Evans as Canada's first ever Minister of artificial intelligence and digital innovation to lead AI policy development and scale industry, trust and adoption. Solomon just delivered his first public remarks saying that the federal government will prioritize economic growth from artificial intelligence over advancing strict new rules. This new approach follows the collapse of Bill C-27’s AI framework, which failed to pass before the election and left Canada without a federal AI law.
Key Insights
Delivering a key note at a Canada 2020 event in Ottawa on June 10, 2025, Solomon said regulation must protect privacy and personal data but should not constrain innovation. Solomon confirmed that the previous governments AI regulation bill is currently under review.
“We’re not here to throw a saddle on the bucking bronco of AI but we do need to make sure it doesn’t kick anyone in the face.”
See: Canada’s AI Competition Report Faces Big Tech Challenges
Feeling the heat of competition, even governments feel FOMO, and the global trend currently is moving from AI safety messaging towards AI adoption strategies. At the AI Action Summit in Paris, U.S. Vice President JD Vance pushed back on Europe’s regulatory overreach, while President Trump’s draft 'One Big Beautiful Bill' includes a proposed ten-year ban on state-level AI rules. Solomon seems aligned with this shift suggesting that global coordination is difficult, and Canada “won’t go it alone”.
But going slow or quiet is also a risk.
NCFA Canada supports a speedy, focused rollout of AI investments that prioritize open access and trust, especially for smaller firms. Without clear guidance, shared tools and integrate support, SMEs will fall behind. Most do not have the internal capacity to evaluate or safely integrate AI, and that puts Canada’s productivity and innovation milestones in jeopardy. Canada's new AI czar, Solomon, acknowledged this gap, saying big companies are adopting AI, but “small and medium enterprises are not.”
Solomon also emphasized government support for Canadian champions like Cohere. In cases where specialized technical leadership is required to build national AI infrastructure, such as secure compute environments, working with proven domestic firms can make strategic sense. But NCFA cautions that these partnerships must be transparent, based on merit, and designed to benefit the broader ecosystem. The priority must remain funding open infrastructure and access, not enabling a sustainable advantage to a select few. Without transparency on this front, Canada risks loss of investment, talent, and IP.
The stakes are high.
The reality is that Canada’s innovation economy simply can't afford red tape bottlenecks or further restrictions that slow AI growth, especially since its hoping that broad adoption of the technology will turn the countries productivity woes around.
See: Canada’s $300M AI Funding Targets SMEs for Growth
Canada also can't afford regulatory ambiguity that raises red flags for domestic and global firms alike. Solomon says he wants to “crank up commercialization” and support IP protection. That will only work if firms trust the environment they’re entering. For that, Canada needs smart policy, not just encouragement.
Why It Matters
Canada is in a global race to lead in responsible AI and having a dedicated AI minister is a positive step, but evolving Canada into a trusted AI economy depends on speed, clarity and inclusion among other things. NCFA calls for the government to boost support for SME adoption, ensure rules are clear and fair, and build national infrastructure that attracts global innovators without sidelining local ones.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
ChatGPT Creator Tells Us What Is Coming Next
AI | June 9, 2025
Image: Ilya Sutskever at University of Toronto convocation June 6, 2025 via Youtube
Ilya Sutskever Warns AI Will Surpass Human Intelligence and Change Work, Value, and Survival
On June 6, 2025 at the University of Toronto’s convocation, Ilya Sutskever, cofounder of OpenAI and lead innovator of ChatGPT, delivered a powerful message while accepting an honorary degree in Doctor of Science (actually his fourth UoT degree). He warned that artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly advancing to a point where it will do everything humans can do, and we're not ready for what comes next.
“The Brain Is a Biological Computer”
Once a machine can learn anything a person can learn, no task is out of reach. This idea is central to Sutskever’s argument that AI will eventually match all human abilities. “We have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer… So why can't a digital brain do the same things?”
The End of Work as We Know It
“The day will come when AI will do all of the things that we can do, not just some of them, but all of them.”
The timeline is uncertain but the direction is clear. Whether it takes 3, 5 or 10 years, general purpose AI will change how the economy functions and how people define and measure productivity.
See: The Rise and Implications of a New AI Software Workforce
Sutskever warns that even efforts to retrain workers may fall short because as technology marches forward, the very jobs people train for could vanish before they are ready to take them on.
“Many will find that the new job they were training for no longer exists by the time they finish retraining.”
He also said that while some will turn to universal basic income but it may not hold up because people may be seen as no longer economically productive.
The Future of Human Value
Sutskever predicts two long-term outcomes. If humans find a way to offer lasting value, we may be treated as companions to AI systems. If not, we risk becoming irrelevant or extinct.
“In the best-case scenario, humanity will become like pets or the microbiome of artificial intelligence. In the worst-case scenario, humanity will become obsolete or even extinct.”
The Challenge of a Lifetime
“The challenge that AI poses is the greatest challenge of humanity ever. And overcoming it will bring the greatest reward.”
He stresses that the response cannot be passive. Every person and institution will need to participate in what this technology becomes.
See: Should Fintechs Design for People or AI Agents?
“Accept reality as it is, try not to regret the past, and try to improve the situation.”
Meeting this moment requires emotional resilience. He says people should remain focused on the present instead of looking backward and encouraged others to adopt the same mindset.
How Canada Should Respond to the Coming AI Disruption
Sutskever’s speech is measured insight into the future, and governments, industry, innovators globally need to take his message as a direct challenge to act now (if you're not already sweating the pace of change in 2025). At NCFA Canada, we believe his message carries the kind of disruption that financial leaders must (anticipate and) respond to with urgency.
See: Global Open Finance Lessons for Canada’s Rulebook
Canada cannot afford to be unprepared. While the changes can be guided with responsible AI efforts, they seemingly cannot be stopped, and so we must act with urgency to be prepared as new AI powered systems will influence financial markets, education, investment models, employment pathways, human mobility and more. the fintech sector needs to become more agile, more connected, and more willing to build for what's coming next.
"Innovating and adapting at the speed of AI development means building solutions and platforms that help people create value alongside AI, not behind or beneath it. It also means designing incentives and safeguards that match the reality of a hybrid workforce where humans and machines co-exist, and to embolden the leadership and collaboration needed to work together to solve problems." Craig Asano, NCFA
Outlook
Canada cannot rely on other jurisdictions to define what safe and responsible AI looks like, and Canadian fintechs and institutions should play a direct role in developing policies, models, and frameworks that ensure AI serves the public interest.
See: AI Concierge Tech and the Future of Finance
This is not just a technology issue. It is a national competitiveness issue. It is also a question of whether we will help define the rules of the future or simply be beholden to them.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
SEC to Host Policy Roundtable with DeFi Builders
DeFi Policy | June 5, 2025
Image: Freepik/rawpixel.com
SEC Invites DeFi Builders and Experts to Discuss Future Policy
On June 9, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is hosting a policy roundtable titled “DeFi and the American Spirit” to have an open and structured policy dialogue with decentralized finance developers, innovators, and legal experts alongside SEC legal and regulatory voices. The roundtable is part of the SEC's Crypto Task Force's ongoing series of crypto asset regulation events.
See: DeFi Technologies Begins Nasdaq Trading in Global Expansion
These gatherings are not 'hearings', nor are they 'policy announcements' but rather conversations with people who have actually built defi systems, in fact many who have publicly challenged the SEC's approach. It’s a live forum where ideas about risk, innovation, and policy design can be tested in real time. So in that way, it's a rare and important event for DeFi in the U.S. and fintechs watching from other jurisdictions like Canada.
Speakers Set the Tone
The speaker lineup is a mix of founders, researchers, lawyers, and advocates who all have somewhat different views on how DeFi should work and be handled from a regulatory and practical perspective.
Erik Voorhees, founder of ShapeShift (and now Venice AI) is known for arguing that decentralized tools and open-source software should not be regulated like traditional financial intermediaries. His participation ensures that the case for user autonomy and protocol neutrality will be represented without compromise.
Michael Mosier, former acting director of FinCEN who founded Arktouros is focused on financial crime and compliance. He's likely to advocate for more robust frameworks for identifying illegal flows through permissionless systems. He'll ensure that AML and systemic risk questions are part of the core conversation.
See: Takeaways from the SEC’s Crypto Custody Roundtable
Rebecca Rettig, general counsel at Jito Labs and formerly with Polygon, brings first-hand experience in understanding protocol development and legal structure, and is well positioned to bring up solutions that don’t rely on full centralization, such as voluntary disclosures or protocol guardrails.
Kevin Werbach, a professor at Wharton, has spent years studying how decentralized systems intersect with regulation. He tends to advocate for layered frameworks that separate software, governance, and commercial activity to provide a way to regulate outcomes without halting innovation.
There are several other panelists including Jill Gunter (Espresso Systems), Peter Van Valkenburgh (Coin Center), Omid Malekan (Columbia Business School), Gabe Shapiro (MetaLeX), and others who will no doubt have ample to contribute in helping the SEC understand as well as framing the policy of decentralized systems.
It’s a great cross-section of people trying to answer the same question from different angles: how should decentralized finance be understood and governed?
What Might Emerge From the Discussion
Here are some core questions that may come up during the discussions:
See: UK Publishes Draft Rules for Crypto Regulation
- Whether front-end operators or governance token holders can be held responsible for protocol-level activity
- Whether full KYC/AML is even feasible in trustless systems, or whether alternative risk controls could satisfy regulatory goals
- Whether decentralized protocols should have a path to safe harbour status if they meet transparency or auditability benchmarks
- How to separate expressive code from financial intermediation in a way that holds up in court
At the end of the day, the SEC should be commended for their willingness to engage with key foundational questions in effort to both understand at a deeper level, as well as inform future policy making. Leaps and bounds better than regulate by enforcement under the SEC's ex-Chair, Gary Gensler and a commission that would rather assume that every DeFi project is either a rug-pull or disguised as a securities platform.
Implications for Canadian Fintech
If the roundtable opens the door to more flexible or fit-for-purpose regulation, Canadian regulators will face growing calls to follow suit. It also offers Canadian founders a window into how U.S. regulators are thinking, what they are worried about, what they may be willing to tolerate, and where they are open to compromise. It's clear proof that the SEC is finally recognizing that DeFi isn't going away and that series policy design needs inputs from the people building it.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
