Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Davos | Jan 19, 2026

Image: Current Global Risk Landscape (WEF 2026 Global Risks Report)
From January 19 to 23, 2026, global leaders are gathering in Davos, Klosters for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2026, one of the few global forums where heads of government, central bankers, investors, and business leaders meet in the same place to discuss economic risk, trade, and long term stability. This year’s theme is "A Spirit of Dialogue", to address growing concerns that cooperation is weakening as global risks are becoming harder to manage.
Ahead of Davos, the World Economic Forum released its Global Risks Report 2026 (102 page PDF) based on its Global Risks Perception Survey of more than 1,300 experts across government, business, academia, and civil society worldwide. Participants were asked to rank the risks most likely to trigger a global crisis in the short term, as well as the most severe risks over longer time horizons.
The report identifies "geoeconomic confrontation" as the top risk most likely to trigger a material global crisis in 2026. 18% of survey respondents ranked it first, moving it ahead of state based armed conflict for the first time. The report defines geoeconomic confrontation as the deliberate use of tariffs, sanctions, export controls, investment screening, subsidies, capital restrictions, and technology controls to advance national interests, rather than as temporary trade friction.
The report frames the current period as an age of competition, where economic tools increasingly replace diplomacy. It also shows that confidence in multilateral systems is weakening.
68% of respondents expecting a more fragmented global order, where countries manage multiple regional relationships instead of relying on a single rules based framework.
Economic risks remain elevated. An economic downturn ranks 6th among global risks for 2026, reflecting concerns tied to trade fragmentation, high debt levels, and asset price vulnerability. The report doesn't predict a specific recession size, but it highlights how shocks can spread faster in a highly interconnected financial system.
The report also quantifies risks tied to trust and technology. Misinformation and disinformation rank 5th, driven by faster and more scalable digital amplification. Cyber insecurity ranks 9th, while adverse outcomes of AI technologies enter the top ten for the first time, reflecting concerns around misuse, governance gaps, and longer term economic and security effects. Importantly, the report shows AI related risks increasing significantly over the ten year horizon, as leaders view AI as a structural risk that compounds other pressures rather than a short term crisis trigger.
Canada doesn't set global rules on its own, but it is deeply affected by how those rules evolve. The Global Risks Report makes clear that mid sized, trade dependent economies face higher exposure when economic pressure becomes a primary policy tool.
Market behaviour already price this sensitivity. Canadian equity markets have shown quick reactions to renewed tariff threats and trade policy signals, reinforcing how closely capital pricing tracks global risk narratives. This volatility isn't driven by domestic structural gaps alone, but by uncertainty in the global trade environment.
In Canada, business leaders are already feeling the pressures Davos is wrestling with. In the Bank of Canada Business Outlook Survey for the fourth quarter of 2025, firms report subdued sentiment and weak recent sales growth, and many point to trade tension and uncertainty as key reasons they stay cautious on hiring and investment. Some exporters also report that they are working harder to sell into markets outside the United States, which fits a broader push toward diversification as global risk rises.
For Canada, the forum offers a place to engage with partners, investors, and institutions that are reassessing risk, diversification, and resilience at the same time. In a world where geoeconomic confrontation leads the risk rankings, visibility and credibility matter.
The risks highlighted in the Global Risks Report translate into practical considerations for Canada’s fintech and innovation ecosystem.
First, trade concentration is a measurable risk.
When tariffs, sanctions, and investment controls rise, companies with narrow market exposure face greater volatility. Diversifying customers, partners, and capital sources becomes a defensive strategy, not just a growth choice.
Second, capital follows predictability. The report links economic downturn risk to policy uncertainty and fragmented governance. Investors respond by adjusting risk premiums, which affects valuations, fundraising timelines, and exit options, particularly for scale ups.
Third, technology risk is contextual, meaning technology itself isn't the main risk. The risk comes from how it is used, governed, and trusted, especially when economic and political tensions are already high. The report doesn't treat AI or digital systems as isolated threats. Instead, it positions them as amplifiers that can worsen misinformation, cyber exposure, and economic disruption if governance and trust break down. For Canadian firms competing globally, credibility around security, governance, and responsible deployment increasingly affects whether they win customers and attract capital.
Trade, finance, and technology are now at the center of geopolitical strategy, with direct consequences for businesses and investors. Canada’s fintech ecosystem should plan for sustained volatility. Growth strategies built on stable trade assumptions face higher risk. Founders and investors who understand these quantified global risks will be better positioned to manage exposure, attract capital, and compete responsibly in a more uncertain global economy.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
AI Regulation | Jan 14, 2026

Image: Freepik
In the first days of January 2026, Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok (developed by xAI and integrated into X) generated sexual images of real people, including images apparently involving minors, after internal safeguards failed. The issue became public immediately after the New Year and has gone viral since. What began as a platform failure quickly expanded into regulatory, legal, and civil society responses across multiple jurisdictions.
Malaysia and Indonesia are the only countries that have confirmed national blocks of Grok access, citing the creation of non-consensual sexualised imagery and public safety risks.
European Union officials also warned that failure to address the issue could lead to enforcement under existing digital safety rules. No EU-wide restriction has been imposed.
Public pressure has also played a role. International NGO Oxfam confirmed it's examining reports involving AI generated sexualised images created by altering real photographs, framing the concern around harm, consent, and exploitation.
Individuals whose likenesses were used in non-consensual AI generated sexual imagery have spoken out publicly in the United States, describing personal harm and exploring legal remedies, as reflected in accounts from people targeted by AI sexual images. Some unions and professional groups have also reduced or paused activity on X following the controversy.
In the United Kingdom, Ofcom launched a formal investigation into X after what it described as “deeply concerning reports” that Grok was being used to create and share sexualized images, including children.
Ofcom said it will assess whether X failed to remove illegal content quickly once aware of it, whether it took appropriate steps to prevent UK users from seeing such material, and whether it deployed highly effective age assurance measures to stop children from accessing pornographic images.
If Ofcom finds X has breached UK law, it can impose a fine of up to 10% of worldwide revenue or £18 million (whichever is greater), and can seek a court order requiring internet service providers to block access to X in the UK.
UK ministers publicly backed the investigation, urging Ofcom to complete it swiftly and stating that victims would not accept delay.
Elon Musk responded publicly by criticising government actions, saying the UK government was looking for “any excuse for censorship” after questions were raised about why other AI platforms were not being examined. Separately, Musk said he was unaware Grok had generated explicit images involving minors and stated such uses violate platform rules.
The United States has not blocked Grok, but lawmakers have focused on liability. The US Senate unanimously passed legislation allowing victims of non-consensual sexually explicit AI generated images to pursue civil action, including damages and court orders.
Canada has also avoided a ban. Ottawa's AI Minister Evan Solomon responsible for artificial intelligence stated the government will not ban Grok or X at this stage, while acknowledging that Canadian law doesn’t clearly address AI generated non-consensual sexual imagery, and that laws needed updating to address deepfakes.
To be sure, AI governance tightens once harm involves identifiable individuals as in this case. Across jurisdictions, responses are focusing on consent, child protection, and platform accountability rather than abstract debates about speech. For fintechs and other regulated firms deploying generative AI, scrutiny is on improving governance, safeguards, and enforcement readiness.
From NCFA's perspective, AI systems should operate within clear legal and ethical boundaries that protect individuals, maintain public trust, and still allow responsible innovation to move forward. As of now, verified developments include two confirmed national blocks, active regulatory investigations, quantified enforcement powers, and new US civil liability legislation. Further responses remain under review.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Oct 17, 2025

Image: Pexels/Pixabay
More and more parts of life in Canada are shifting online. People order groceries from their phones, see doctors over video, and handle work, bills, and banking without leaving home. Some have leaned into it fully, while others are still getting used to the pace of change. The tools are here, and the habits are forming, but not everyone is moving at the same speed.
Technology has made daily life in Canada smoother and safer. Most services are now running on secure platforms that have been designed to protect users and keep things simple. Ordering food, paying bills, or setting medical appointments can be completed in a few minutes with a phone. Many Canadians now use grocery delivery apps that show real-time updates from order to door delivery. It's a little change, but one that has saved hours each week and reduced long drives.
Entertainment has followed the same path. Many new online casino sites have added cryptocurrency payments, which give users more control over how they deposit or withdraw funds. This extra layer of protection and transparency has made people more confident when playing online, especially as data safety becomes a bigger concern across the web.
Similar growth can be observed in fitness and learning platforms. People can now join live training sessions or online workshops led by professionals. Someone in Halifax can follow a yoga teacher in Vancouver, or do a little course in digital skills from home.
Most Canadians don't have to visit a branch any longer, thanks to digital banking services. Some apps even have smart alerts that can flag any odd spending patterns or suggest ways to save a bit more each month.
What’s also changing is the way financial tools understand users. Thanks to data-sharing between platforms, loan offers or tips on saving can be individually adapted to personal habits.
School is no longer associated with a building. Plenty of Canadians take courses from places they've never even been, thanks to online learning that doesn't care about distance at all.
What makes this work isn't just video lessons. Tools that allow people to talk, edit projects together, or share live screens make group work possible, even when classmates are hundreds of kilometers away.
Free courses on anything, from languages to tech skills, are helping people level up in ways that weren't accessible before. For someone restarting their career or adjusting to life in a new country, that kind of access can be the difference between feeling stuck and moving on.
The workplace doesn't look like it used to. People complete tasks from home, public spaces, or anywhere with Wi-Fi.
A large part of this change is due to the technology operating in the background. Tasks that used to require time are being automated. That could involve tasks such as filing, tracking inventory, or flagging issues before they spiral out of control. It just frees up people to get everything done that needs actual thinking.
There are many rural and Indigenous communities in Canada that do not have proper or affordable connections. Until that happens, the digital transition won't be evenly distributed.
Some people also don't feel confident using new tech. That's why local training programs and simple tools matter; they help people to catch up without feeling overwhelmed. Cost is another issue. Not everyone can afford to buy a new phone or laptop. Community efforts and tech grants are helping, but there's still work to do to make digital access fair.
At this point, the answer is yes. While there are gaps that need to be filled, the overall shift has already been established. The pieces are falling into place, and more people are finding ways to make tech fit into their world, not the other way around.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Cybersecurity | Oct 14, 2025

Image: Freepik
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt for showing that economies grow when they reward new ideas, open competition, and constant renewal. Their work (and recognition) explains why some economies continue to grow while others stall, or how innovation drives prosperity.
Joel Mokyr’s research reveals that progress depends on how societies treat knowledge. When Europe opened up to new ideas, rulers across Europe competed to attract inventors, scientists, and thinkers. They funded experiments, founded academies, and allowed freedom to publish and debate. This open culture created trust and collaboration, which led to faster discovery. Insight is that innovation takes off when knowledge is shared, incentives are aligned with progress, and institutions reward learning rather than control.
Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt built the modern model that explains how this process sustains itself. Their work on creative destruction shows that growth happens when new firms and technologies replace outdated ones. Productivity increases even as some firms exit the market. They demonstrated that competition and innovation are not opposites but partners. Economies that encourage entry and tolerate failure grow faster because resources move to better ideas. Insight is that protection slows progress, but experimentation drives renewal.
Sounds familiar, right?
A popular LinkedIn post by a specialist in regulatory policy Martyn Hopper, interpreted these Nobel insights into a practical framework for today's economies. In his aptly titled LinkedIn post, “Regulating for Growth”.
Hopper explained that innovation only turns into prosperity when three things work together:
When these conditions are in place, disruption becomes productive renewal. When they are missing, it produces dislocation, stagnation, and political frustration.
Hopper’s key insight reframes regulation itself. He says the real challenge is not cutting rules but designing them to direct energy toward innovation rather than rent-extraction (read: siphoning off profits for benefit).
Regulation is the architecture that decides who can participate, how capital flows, and whether progress is rewarded or resisted. It determines whether a system produces creation or protection, renewal or capture. This makes regulation one of the most powerful economic tools for growth.
As Canada has it's back up against the wall in terms of innovation and competition policy (despite recent shifting winds), the Nobel findings and Hopper's sensibilities, business leaders and policymakers have clear takeways.
The best performing economies are those that combine competitive markets with policies that support transition. For policymakers, the lesson is that regulation must make innovation easier, not riskier. It must reward entry and experimentation, ensure fair access to finance, and help communities absorb change. Sustained success comes from openness, agility, and willingness to reinvest in new ideas. Remember, a system without the ability to expel old and add new will eventually die on the vine.
Growth is designed through the choices made about who can compete, how ideas are financed, and how regulation treats innovation. When those choices are right, economies attract investment, scale technology faster, and sustain higher productivity.
For Canada’s fintech and financial innovation community, these insights are especially timely. NCFA’s advocacy for proportionate rules, open and fair competition, and technology-driven productivity and inclusion innovation aligns directly with the Nobel research and Hopper’s interpretation.
Canada's challenge is evolving from purely risk management towards opportunity design. Regulators can accelerate innovation by creating flexible entry routes for new players, supporting data-driven compliance, and directing finance toward startups and scale-ups that drive transformation.
It's about injecting newness and opportunity which in turn will build resilience. When innovation is supported by sound regulation, it strengthens the economy’s ability to adapt, protects consumers, and expands access to capital.
Fintech, open banking, and AI can be powerful enablers of this change if the regulatory system is built for learning and collaboration rather than delay and protectionism.
The Nobel Committee recognized that growth doesn't happen by accident. It's built through systems that enable innovation, reward competition, and manage transition. Martyn Hopper’s framework shows what that looks like in practice. Smart regulation channels capital to new ideas, supports those affected by change, and keeps markets open for renewal. For Canada’s fintech sector, this is the roadmap to back that turns creative disruption into long-term competitiveness, productivity, and inclusion.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Oct 7, 2025

Image: Freepik/tonodiaz
The Indian stock market is often a reflection of investor sentiment, company fundamentals, and broader macroeconomic shifts. One of the indicators investors watch closely is the 52-week high and low levels of stocks. A stock trading near its 52-week low often sparks curiosity: Is it a bargain buy or a falling knife?
ITC has long been considered a safe bet for conservative investors. But with the stock hovering close to its 52-week low, the pressing question is: Should ITC be on your radar now? In this blog, we will explore whether investors should consider buying ITC stock at its 52-week low.
The stocks near 52 week low is the lowest price at which a stock has traded in the past year. For many investors, this is a signal that the stock may be undervalued. However, it could also indicate deeper structural challenges or declining investor confidence.
Hence, before considering ITC, it’s essential to look at its fundamentals, recent developments, and industry dynamics.
ITC has diversified revenue streams from cigarettes to FMCG, hotels, and agri-exports, which have helped it remain resilient, though growth in its non-cigarette business segments has been slower than rivals like HUL or Nestlé.
As of September 2025,the ITC share price is trading close to its 52-week low of ₹390.15, currently hovering around ₹410.65. It is still far below its 52-week peak of ₹528.50. In comparison to the broader index and its Nifty FMCG peers, it has underperformed with a decline of almost 15% in the last year.
There are several factors behind the ITC share falling to its 52-week low levels. Some of those reasons are:
Investors often rotate out of defensives like FMCG into higher-growth sectors (IT, auto, banks) when markets are bullish.
Compared to FMCG peers, ITC’s topline expansion remains moderate, particularly in branded foods and hotels.
After its multi-year rally (2021-2023), profit booking has amplified near-term declines.
Cigarettes remain under heavy scrutiny due to taxation and health regulations. Any potential tax hikes impact sentiment.
The company recently announced the demerger of its hotel business, which led to mixed reactions from the market.

ITC Near 52 Week Low
With ITC close to its 52-week low, investors may find it to be a risky but appealing entry point. The following is a discussion of the causes of both cases:
A stock hitting its 52-week low should not be the sole reason to buy or sell; it’s a signal that requires deeper analysis. In ITC’s case, while regulatory risks and slower growth weigh on sentiment, its dividend yield, diversified business, and defensive nature make it a strong option for conservative investors.
Therefore, ITC should be on the radar of those investors who seek stability, regular dividends, and a defensive play, and investors who are chasing aggressive growth and fast-moving stocks should not consider investing in ITC at its 52-week low share price.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create aa vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |