Karsten Wenzlaff, Advisor
August 26th, 2025
Karsten Wenzlaff is a Crowdfunding and Fintech Expert from Germany. He is Secretary-General of Digit[...]
Category Archives: Blockchain, Crypto, Digital Assets, Tokens, CBDCs, Stablecoins, Metaverse, NFTs
Almost $4 Billion Shows What Lower Securities Friction Can Do
August 21, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure, Regulation And Policy, Competition And Market Structure
LIFE Financing Rose Eightfold After Canada Increased Exemption Limits
On August 18, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators published its 2025–2026 Year in Review. One capital formation result stands out. After regulators increased the limits for the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption, hundreds of listed issuers used it to raise almost $4 billion in the first year, at eight times the pace under the original limits.
That is unusually useful regulatory evidence. It doesn't prove the higher limits caused every additional financing, since issuer demand and market conditions also affect activity. But the market used the exemption far more heavily after regulators made it more practical. The result also strengthens a larger question NCFA recently explored around whether Canada can turn access into productive participation rather than stopping at permission on paper.
NCFA reviewed the expanded LIFE exemption when the CSA initially increased how much eligible listed companies could raise without preparing a prospectus for each financing.
The new usage data take that reform beyond policy design. Companies had a less burdensome financing route available and hundreds chose to use it.
Hundreds Of Listed Issuers Raised Almost $4 Billion Through LIFE
The LIFE exemption gives eligible reporting issuers a more efficient way to raise public capital while retaining specified disclosure and investor protections. This matters most when the fixed costs of a conventional financing become large relative to the amount a smaller company needs to raise. A financing route can exist legally and still see limited use if its cost, complexity or timing makes the economics unattractive.
The first year under the higher limits provides evidence that those economics are essential. Hundreds of issuers used LIFE and almost $4 billion was raised, compared with a much lower pace under the previous limits. The important result is not simply that Canada permitted more financing. Issuers actually used the additional room.
That gives regulators a stronger basis for the next round of evaluation. Which companies used LIFE, how large were the financings, what did it cost them to raise the money, how did investors fare and how much activity would have occurred through another route anyway? Those questions can help distinguish a rule that merely looks simpler from one that materially improves capital formation.
CSA Widens Investor Access And Cuts Reporting Costs For Smaller Issuers
The CSA is reducing different forms of friction elsewhere in the market. Eligible venture issuers with less than $10 million in annual revenue can voluntarily file financial results semiannually rather than quarterly under an interim regime. Regulators can use what they learn from that regime when considering permanent rules, making issuer cost and actual market use part of the feedback process.
The proposed self certified investor exemption approaches participation from the investor side. People who satisfy specified education or experience criteria could invest even if they don't meet the financial thresholds for accredited investors, with investments capped at $50,000 per calendar year across multiple businesses. The proposal would give Canadian issuers another potential source of private capital while widening access for investors regulators believe have enough knowledge or experience to understand the risks.
Accredited investor rules largely use wealth and income as proxies for the ability to bear risk, while the proposed exemption would also recognize relevant knowledge or experience. If adopted, its value should eventually be judged by more than the number of investors who become legally eligible. Issuer uptake, investment activity, losses, complaints and other investor outcomes would show whether wider access produces a useful market.
Project Tokenization Brings More Than 240 Organizations Into CSA Work
The same focus on actual market use is reaching new securities infrastructure. NCFA covered the launch of Project Tokenization when the CSA opened stakeholder engagement through the Collaboratory and identified a possible route toward live testing. The CSA now says the project has engaged more than 240 organizations spanning issuers, fintech companies, custodians, marketplaces, clearing agencies, professional firms and other participants.
The CSA Collaboratory gives novel products and market structures a way to engage regulators before launch and can support controlled testing where appropriate. That's important because tokenized securities depend on more than an issuer receiving permission to create a digital asset. Custody, ownership records, trading, settlement, compliance and investor protection all have to work well enough for a product to operate economically.
Tokenization is a more complex extension of the LIFE lesson. LIFE shows what happened after one capital raising constraint was relaxed. The U.S. is also reconsidering how securities rules apply to crypto asset capital raising, including proposals that could expand how much eligible issuers can raise under lighter offering requirements. In Canada, Project Tokenization can show whether regulators and market participants can identify which requirements are essential, which need adapting and which create enough cost or uncertainty to prevent otherwise viable infrastructure from being built here.
Ontario Plans To Join Canada's Securities Passport System
Ontario's commitment to join Canada's securities passport system tackles another longstanding source of friction. Our Ontario securities passport story traced how the province moved from pursuing a national regulator to joining the existing passport model. The CSA says Ontario's participation is intended to strengthen national harmonization, remove interprovincial barriers and reduce regulatory burden for companies doing business across Canada.
For firms operating nationally, duplicated provincial processes can become an operating cost even when the underlying securities requirements are similar. The useful evidence after Ontario joins will be whether companies encounter less duplication, lower compliance costs and easier national market access. Regulatory reform becomes much more informative when policymakers can compare what they changed with what companies and investors actually did afterward.
Lower friction does not mean removing protections wherever market participants find them expensive. The CSA issued 763 investor alerts, cautions and warnings during the year, more than 85% involving crypto assets, and facilitated the deactivation of 11,728 malicious investment websites representing 19,860 URLs.
Some rules clearly protect investors and market integrity. Others may now be costing the market more than they protect.
LIFE gives Canada a rare piece of evidence about that balance. Almost $4 billion and an eightfold increase in financing activity give regulators a reason to look for other places where better calibrated rules could produce more usable markets without sacrificing the protections that keep those markets credible.
Talking Point
If higher LIFE limits were followed by an eightfold increase in capital raised through the exemption, which other securities rules should Canada now test against actual issuer and investor behaviour?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
 |  |  |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
SEC Regulation Crypto Assets and US$75M Fundraising Rules
August 18, 2026 | NCFA Feature | Regulation And Policy, Digital Assets, Capital Markets And Market Infrastructure
New Offering Rules, Crypto Resales And Investment Contract Exit
On August 18, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed Regulation Crypto Assets (download 402 page PDF Proposed Regulation Crypto Assets document), a tailored securities framework for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The 402-page proposal would create a startup exemption of up to US$5 million over four years, a larger fundraising exemption with US$20 million and US$75 million tiers, crypto-specific disclosures, new SEC forms, secondary-market provisions, state-law preemption and a process for determining when an investment contract has ended.
The scope is narrower than the name might suggest. Regulation Crypto Assets would apply to what the SEC calls a covered investment contract. A crypto asset must be subject to the investment contract, the crypto asset itself must not be a security and no other asset can be subject to that contract.
That builds on the SEC's March 2026 crypto interpretation. The March action addressed when transactions involving a non-security crypto asset can create an investment contract and when that relationship can end. Regulation Crypto Assets would add an operating framework around that lifecycle.
The proposal is significant because it goes beyond creating two new fundraising limits. The SEC is designing rules for how certain crypto investment contracts could be offered, disclosed, distributed and resold, and how the underlying crypto asset could eventually separate from the investment contract.
What Regulation Crypto Assets Does And Does Not Cover
The proposed Regulation Crypto Assets isn't a comprehensive U.S. crypto rulebook. It doesn't create the general regulatory regime for payment stablecoins, programmable payments, crypto custody, crypto lending, mining or conventional securities that happen to be tokenized. Those activities may fall under other federal or state laws, other regulators or separate SEC work.
Payment stablecoins are a good example. Regulation Crypto Assets says permitted payment stablecoins could be accepted as consideration in a covered offering and would count toward its offering limit. It does not establish the rules for issuing payment stablecoins.
That work is proceeding separately under the federal GENIUS Act. On August 17, one day before the SEC proposal, the U.S. Treasury issued a proposed payment stablecoin rule covering implementation of the separate federal framework for their issuance, offering and sale.
Other crypto activities can intersect with Regulation Crypto Assets without becoming generally regulated by it. The proposed Startup Exemption contemplates certain distributions connected with development and use of a crypto network, including circumstances involving airdrops, staking, governance, gas fees and testing. The legal question remains whether the particular transaction involves a covered investment contract.
The proposal also doesn't create a new legal category for tokenized stocks or bonds. Tokenized conventional securities remain securities. Regulation Crypto Assets instead addresses a narrower case where the crypto asset itself isn't a security but is subject to an investment contract.
It's important for founders, investors, lawyers and trading platforms to know that a crypto asset, an investment contract involving that asset and a tokenized security, can look technologically similar while carrying very different securities-law consequences.
The US$5M Startup Route Removes Several Reg CF Frictions
The proposed Startup Exemption could be used for no more than four years after an issuer's initial Form NOR filing. The issuer and its affiliates could conduct covered transactions up to an aggregate US$5 million during that period and couldn't simply restart the four-year clock for the same or a substantially similar crypto asset.
The issuer definition is unusually flexible. The proposal would allow an entity, an individual or a group of individuals or entities to qualify, subject to the other conditions. That accommodates crypto projects that may begin with a development team before they resemble a conventional corporate securities issuer.
The fundraising mechanics are also important. The proposed startup route would permit general solicitation, impose no individual investment limit on retail purchasers and require neither financial statements nor use of a registered intermediary. Covered investment contracts sold through the exemption would not be restricted securities under federal law and would not carry a separate rule-based holding period.
Disclosure doesn't disappear. Before conducting covered transactions, the issuer would file Form NOR on EDGAR and make the disclosures required by Rule 103 publicly available free of charge.
Those disclosures are designed around the investment contract and crypto network. They include offering terms, management and conflicts, the crypto asset, development plans, network or application security, source code where applicable, token economics and allocations, governance, the related crypto ecosystem and material risks. The information must remain publicly available, with material changes addressed under the proposal's update requirements.
Bad-actor disqualifications would apply as well, and issuers would remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation rules. This is a different compliance model, not an absence of securities regulation.
The most revealing comparison is Regulation Crowdfunding. Reg CF also permits up to US$5 million, but over a 12-month period. It requires a registered broker-dealer or funding portal, financial disclosure and investment limits for non-accredited investors, while securities generally face a one-year resale restriction.
The SEC makes that comparison itself. Its economic analysis estimates average Reg CF intermediary fees at approximately 6.6%, with a 6% median, and identifies the absence of mandatory financial statements and an intermediary as potential cost savings under the crypto Startup Exemption.
There is little evidence that current Reg CF rules have produced a large crypto financing market. SEC data identify 42 crypto-related Reg CF offerings by 41 issuers between 2016 and 2024. Reported proceeds totalled approximately US$13.6 million, with an average of US$545,300 among offerings for which proceeds were reported. The SEC cautions that the proceeds total is incomplete and likely represents a lower bound.
The proposal is therefore testing more than a higher ceiling. It asks whether removing particular intermediary, financial reporting, investor and resale frictions would make a public capital route more workable for qualifying crypto projects.
Tier 1 Fundraising Exemption US$20M With Ongoing Reporting
Larger projects could instead use the proposed Fundraising Exemption. Tier 1 would permit up to US$20 million in 12 months. The issuer would have to file Form 1-CRYPTO and couldn't sell covered investment contracts until the SEC qualified the offering statement.
The offering circular would combine the crypto-specific Rule 103 disclosures with financial information about the issuer. Tier 1 financial statements generally wouldn't require an audit, but the issuer would still enter an ongoing reporting regime using annual Form 1-KC, semiannual Form 1-SC and Form 1-UC for specified current events.
Retail investors would also face a restriction that doesn't apply under the Startup Exemption. A non-accredited investor generally couldn't purchase more than 10% of the greater of annual income or net worth. For a non-natural person, the test would use revenue or net assets.
Tier 2 Fundraising Exemption US$75M With Audited Financials
Tier 2 would permit up to US$75 million in 12 months. Like Tier 1, it would require Form 1-CRYPTO, SEC qualification before sales, ongoing reporting and the 10% non-accredited investor limit. The key additional financial requirement is that Tier 2 statements would have to be audited by an independent accountant under the proposed standards.
The larger Fundraising Exemption also comes with a strong U.S. nexus. The issuer would have to be an entity organized under U.S. law, a majority of its executive officers or directors would need to be U.S. citizens or residents, more than half of its assets would need to be in the United States and its business would have to be administered principally there.
Canada appears explicitly in the SEC's request for comment. Question 86 asks whether Canadian issuers, or other foreign issuers, should be permitted to rely on the Fundraising Exemption.
That is more than a passing jurisdictional detail. Regulation A already allows qualifying Canadian issuers, while the proposed Regulation Crypto Assets fundraising route currently does not. Whether the SEC changes that provision could affect how useful the US$20 million and US$75 million routes become for Canadian crypto companies.
Resale And State Rules Could Expand Crypto Distribution
The proposal's treatment of secondary transfers may prove almost as important as its fundraising limits. The SEC says existing exemptions can impede the network effects of crypto assets when they restrict who can participate or how quickly securities can be resold.
Both proposed exemptions would therefore allow issuers to sell covered investment contracts that are not restricted securities under federal law. Investors wouldn't face the federal holding periods associated with restricted securities, although contractual restrictions and other applicable laws could still affect a transfer.
That differs from common Regulation D offerings and from Reg CF's first-year resale limits. The SEC's rationale is specific to crypto networks. Wider ownership and use can contribute to how a network operates and how the crypto asset derives value, so distribution restrictions can affect more than investor liquidity.
See: Canada's Stablecoin Regulatory Framework
Rule 500 would address another obstacle by proposing federal preemption of certain state registration and qualification requirements. It would treat purchasers in qualifying Regulation Crypto Assets transactions as qualified purchasers for that purpose and extend the treatment to specified secondary-market transactions.
The preemption isn't unlimited. Secondary-market treatment would depend on the issuer remaining current with the disclosure, filing or reporting requirements attached to the applicable exemption. States would also retain antifraud authority, powers over unlawful broker or dealer conduct, notice filing requirements and applicable fees.
For trading platforms and intermediaries, the proposal introduces an additional status question. They may need to distinguish between the underlying non-security crypto asset, an outstanding covered investment contract involving it and an asset for which that investment-contract relationship has ended.
The Safe Harbor Creates An Investment Contract Exit
Rule 400 addresses one of the most distinctive features of the proposal. The SEC's existing securities rules generally deal with financial instruments whose fundamental legal character doesn't change over time. A crypto asset can present a different problem because an investment contract surrounding it may end while the crypto asset continues to exist and circulate.
The proposed safe harbor would apply when the issuer has completed or permanently ceased all essential managerial efforts that it represented or promised under the covered investment contract. The issuer also couldn't be making, or intending to make, new promises to perform those essential managerial efforts.
An issuer seeking to use the safe harbor would file Form TR. The filing would include a certification and an analysis supporting the conclusion that the required managerial efforts have ended.
Meeting those conditions would mean the crypto asset is deemed no longer subject to that investment contract for the relevant definitions of a security under the Securities Act and Exchange Act. That doesn't mean Form TR can convert a security into a non-security simply because an issuer files it. The substantive conditions still have to be satisfied, and the SEC can challenge an issuer's analysis.
Nor does the proposal replace Howey or the March interpretation. The safe harbor creates one defined route for dealing with the end of an investment contract. The SEC acknowledges that a covered investment contract could also cease to exist outside the safe harbor under the applicable securities-law analysis.
That lifecycle helps explain why the proposal is more consequential than a new exemption schedule.
The SEC is contemplating a regulatory sequence in which a project can finance development through an investment contract, distribute the associated crypto asset widely and potentially reach a point where the investment contract itself no longer exists.
Canada Could Face A Wider Crypto And Funding Gap
Canada has dealt with token offerings for years. Canadian securities regulators issued guidance on cryptocurrency offerings in 2017 and followed with more detailed token offering guidance in 2018. The CSA has made clear that coins or tokens can involve investment contracts and distributions of securities depending on their economic substance and how they are offered.
There have also been Canadian security-token initiatives and exempt-market token offerings. The difference isn't that Canada has avoided token issuance. Canada has generally applied its existing securities laws, prospectus exemptions and registration framework rather than creating a dedicated crypto lifecycle regime comparable to Regulation Crypto Assets. That difference also fits Canada's wider capital formation gap.
Capital formation makes that difference more important. Canada's NI 45-110 startup crowdfunding exemption currently permits an eligible issuer to raise up to C$1.5 million over 12 months. An investor generally can invest up to C$2,500 in an offering, or C$10,000 when a registered dealer determines that the investment is suitable, and the offering must take place through a funding portal.
The Canadian market is also much smaller. FrontFundr reports that it processed C$4.79 million from 4,320 investors under NI 45-110 in 2025 and accounted for 93% of activity under the exemption. Because that 93% figure comes from FrontFundr rather than an official national regulatory dataset, it should be treated as a platform estimate rather than an official Canadian market total.
There is stronger evidence that the C$1.5 million ceiling is becoming binding for some issuers. Edison Motors raised C$1.491 million under NI 45-110 in 2025, roughly 99% of the limit. Blossom Social raised C$1.450 million, approximately 97%.
See: Reg CF At 10 Shows Equity Crowdfunding Works
The more direct U.S. comparison is Regulation Crowdfunding. Reg CF already allows eligible companies to raise up to US$5 million in 12 months, but requires an SEC-registered intermediary, limits investments by non-accredited investors and generally restricts resale for one year. The proposed US$5 million crypto Startup Exemption would use the same headline ceiling with a different compliance model.
The larger crypto Fundraising Exemption is more directly comparable with Regulation A. Existing Reg A already uses US$20 million Tier 1 and US$75 million Tier 2 limits, with additional audit, investor-protection and ongoing-reporting requirements at Tier 2.
Canada is a different comparison. NI 45-110 isn't a crypto-specific equivalent to Regulation Crypto Assets, but it is Canada's nationally harmonized startup crowdfunding route. It remains capped at C$1.5 million over 12 months, with a funding-portal requirement and investor limits of C$2,500 per offering or C$10,000 with suitability advice from a registered dealer.
NCFA has been advocating for a C$5 million or higher issuer cap for years, arguing that the C$1.5 million ceiling can limit the usefulness of the exemption for growing companies. That concern is now easier to test against actual market activity, with some Canadian crowdfunding campaigns reaching close to the current ceiling.
The relevant policy question is therefore wider than whether Canada has an identical crypto exemption. The U.S. already offers Reg CF and Regulation A for different stages of capital raising and is now proposing a separate crypto-specific framework built around fundraising, token distribution, resale and the eventual end of an investment contract.
That matters because Canada's capital formation system already has funding gaps, while some Canadian crowdfunding campaigns are reaching the NI 45-110 ceiling. Regulation Crypto Assets could add another financing and regulatory option to the U.S. market without a directly comparable Canadian crypto-specific route.
The proposed US$75 million Tier 2 also raises a separate competitiveness issue. The SEC is asking whether Canadian issuers should eventually be eligible for the Fundraising Exemption. If they are included, qualifying Canadian crypto companies could gain access to a much larger U.S. pathway. If they remain excluded, access to U.S. capital could become another factor projects consider when deciding where to organize and raise funds.
None of this means Canadian regulators should copy the SEC. It does strengthen the case for examining Canada's startup financing limits, token-offering rules and capital-market pathways together rather than as separate policy files.
For Canada, the challenge is whether existing rules can protect investors while giving legitimate companies enough financing capacity and regulatory flexibility to build here. If the U.S. adds specialized crypto fundraising routes on top of Reg CF and Regulation A, that competitive comparison becomes more difficult to ignore.
Talking Point
If the U.S. adds a dedicated crypto capital-formation and investment-contract lifecycle regime on top of Reg CF and Regulation A, while Canada still relies on existing exemptions and a C$1.5 million startup crowdfunding cap, how long can Canada treat crypto regulation and capital-formation reform as separate policy questions?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
NCFA Weekly Fintech Intelligence Aug 8-14, 2026
Aug 8, 2026 | NCFA Fintech Whisperer | Digital Banking And BaaS, Regulation And Policy, SME Finance And Business Banking, Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Artificial Intelligence And Data, Wealthtech Investing And Trading, Embedded Finance, Risk Compliance And Regtech, Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL, Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime
Image: Freepik
This live weekly NCFA intelligence page tracks financial technology developments that significantly affect how fintechs build, sell, raise capital, and operate under scrutiny. Coverage prioritizes Canada and includes global events that directly influence competitive conditions, market access, and execution realities across fintech sectors. This page will be updated throughout the week with market movers in a live format and then each week we'll close the prior week's contents in prep for the upcoming week, and continue on a rolling basis. (Missed prior week's Fintech Whisperer? (December 6-12, 2025, December 13-19, 2025, January 1-9, 2026, January 10-16, 2026, January 17-23, 2026, January 24-30, 2026, January 31-February 6, 2026, February 7-13, 2026, February 14-20, 2026, February 21-27, 2026, February 28-March 6, 2026, March 7-13, 2026, March 14-20, 2026, March 21-27, 2026, March 28-April 3, 2026, April 4-10, 2026, April 11-17, 2026, April 18-24, 2026, April 25-May 1, 2026, May 2-8, 2026, May 9-15, 2026, May 16-22, 2026, May 23-29, 2026, May 30-June 5, 2026, June 6-12, 2026, June 13-19, 2026, June 20-26, 2026, June 27-July 3, 2026, July 4-July 10, 2026, July 11-July 17, 2026, July 18-24, 2026, July 25-July 31 2026, August 1-August 7, 2026).
Weekly Fintech Market Intelligence Aug 8 - 14, 2026
Wealthtech Investing And Trading
Gate Expands Into U.S. Stocks And Tokenized Equities Through Alpaca
August 13, 2026, Global
- Gate, which Alpaca says serves more than 58 million users, launched access to more than 10,000 U.S. listed stocks and ETFs, eligible IPO allocations and tokenized stocks using Alpaca infrastructure.
- Alpaca provides the brokerage infrastructure behind the offering and supports custody and settlement of the underlying shares associated with Gate's gStocks tokenized stock product.
- One day earlier, Crypto.com launched Tokenized Stocks through Alpaca for a platform serving more than 150 million customers, offering economic exposure to 1,500 U.S. stocks and ETFs from US$1, with selected products available around the clock.
- Crypto.com's products are derivative financial instruments that provide economic exposure rather than ownership of the underlying shares or associated shareholder rights.
Large crypto platforms are starting to look more like multi asset investment distributors, but the infrastructure underneath them is still regulated brokerage, custody and settlement. Alpaca has been building specifically for this role, which NCFA recently examined in its global brokerage platform expansion. The competitive question is who controls that regulated layer as crypto, traditional securities and tokenized products converge inside the same customer interface.
BlackRock Canada Embeds Bitcoin In Diversified ETF
August 10, 2026, Canada
- BlackRock Canada launched the iShares Equity + Bitcoin ETF Portfolio, or IBQT, on the Toronto Stock Exchange with a strategic allocation of approximately 97% global equities and 3% bitcoin.
- The fund carries a 0.22% management fee and packages Canadian, U.S., international and emerging market equities with bitcoin exposure inside one portfolio.
- IBQT currently gets its bitcoin exposure through BlackRock’s Canadian IBIT fund, extending that product from a standalone bitcoin investment into a component of a diversified portfolio.
IBQT changes where the crypto allocation decision happens. Investors choosing the fund are buying a diversified equity portfolio with bitcoin already assigned a modest strategic weight, rather than adding crypto separately. That puts bitcoin closer to conventional portfolio construction and gives Canadian advisers and investors a simple way to combine traditional markets and digital assets in one listed product.
Payments Infrastructure And Money Movement
Flywire And Trustly Bring Pay By Bank To Canada
August 12, 2026, Canada / United States
- Flywire expanded its Trustly partnership into Canada and the United States, letting payers authorize large domestic and cross border payments directly from their bank accounts.
- In Canada, the payment itself runs through Pre Authorized Debit. Trustly adds bank authentication and account connectivity around that existing rail rather than using Canada’s future regulated payment initiation framework.
- The service removes manual account entry during checkout and adds payment verification and risk controls around higher value bank transfers.
Pay by Bank is reaching Canadian customers before regulated payment initiation does. Foreign providers are improving the experience around an existing Canadian bank rail instead of waiting for new infrastructure. That makes the commercial timing important for Canada’s open banking opportunity: future regulated access will enter a market where some of the customer experience is already being built.
Dream Payments Launches Programmable U.S. Payout Network
August 11, 2026, Canada / United States
- Toronto based Dream Payments launched Dream Payouts for eligible U.S. businesses in collaboration with J.P. Morgan Payments, supporting payments to suppliers, partners and individuals.
- Eligible payments can arrive through the RTP network in under 30 seconds, including nights, weekends and holidays, with ACH and wire available when instant delivery is unavailable or not selected.
- Software platforms can embed payout capabilities, while Dream provides recipient onboarding, identity checks, banking verification, approval controls and transaction tracking from initiation through settlement.
- Dream says the infrastructure can support software and AI agents that initiate, approve and reconcile payments within defined business controls.
Dream is taking infrastructure built by a Canadian fintech into U.S. business payment workflows where the payment can start inside the software that created the obligation. That also gives agent payment infrastructure a more concrete operating model: software can participate in the workflow, but identity, authority, approval and settlement controls still determine whether money moves.
Francisco Partners To Acquire Moneris For C$2 Billion
August 10, 2026, Canada
- Francisco Partners agreed to acquire Moneris from RBC and BMO for approximately C$2.0 billion in cash, with each bank receiving half of the proceeds. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions.
- RBC and BMO will keep exclusive referral relationships with Moneris even as ownership of the payments company transfers to Francisco Partners.
- Moneris says it has nearly 2,000 employees in Canada and will retain its Canadian headquarters and technology infrastructure after the transaction closes.
Last year’s Moneris sale discussion has become a signed change of control. RBC and BMO are giving up ownership while preserving customer distribution, leaving Francisco Partners to decide how aggressively Moneris invests across merchant acquiring, commerce software and payments technology. The separation between infrastructure ownership and bank distribution is the more consequential part of the deal.
Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding
Canada Starts Trial Of Government Securities Fail Fee Framework
August 13, 2026, Canada
- CIMPA and CDS will begin the first stage of Canada's fail fee framework for Government of Canada bond and T-bill transactions on September 8, 2026.
- The trial will run for at least 18 months. Settlement fails and indicative fees will be calculated, statistics will be published and CDS participants will receive reports and indicative invoices.
- No fail fees will be charged or paid during this first stage. The Canadian Fixed-Income Forum will decide whether payments are activated later.
Canada is putting a settlement discipline framework into live measurement before imposing a financial penalty. That gives dealers, custodians and market infrastructure providers time to see where fails occur, what the operational burden looks like and whether the fee design changes settlement behaviour. The evidence from the trial will determine whether a reporting framework eventually becomes an economic incentive.
Canada Starts Standardized Government Collateral Trading On CCMS
August 12, 2026, Canada
- CIMPA, TMX Group and Clearstream have started repo trading using a standardized Government of Canada General Collateral basket on the Canadian Collateral Management Service.
- CCMS automates repo collateral management and supports unlimited real time collateral substitution, giving participants another way to manage liquidity and collateral throughout a transaction.
- The first GoC basket is expected to be followed by standardized baskets covering provincial securities, Canada Mortgage Bonds, NHA mortgage backed securities, public sector securities and corporate collateral.
Canada's repo market now has a standardized collateral workflow running on infrastructure that the Bank of Canada also plans to use for its domestic repo operations. Wider adoption would make collateral easier to allocate and substitute across financing activity while reducing manual processing. The next evidence is usage: how much repo activity migrates onto CCMS and whether the additional baskets deepen participation beyond Government of Canada securities.
PointsKash Expands Capital Commitment To Support National Kiosk Rollout
August 12, 2026, United States
- PointsKash announced an expanded strategic capital commitment of up to US$100 million from Hawk Capital Advisors to support commercialization and national deployment of its financial services platform.
- The first phase provides for up to US$35 million through October 30, 2026 for priorities including refurbishment and deployment of approximately 2,100 company owned KashPoint kiosks, technology integration, merchant activation, PK Pay development and working capital.
- A second phase could provide up to another US$65 million between February and April 2027, subject to operating and deployment milestones, customary closing conditions and financing availability.
The financing connects capital directly to deployment of a physical and digital financial services network rather than funding an undefined expansion plan. PointsKash acquired more than 2,100 cryptocurrency kiosks earlier in August and now has a staged capital structure intended to refurbish and redeploy that hardware while building payments, merchant and mobile services around it. The conditional structure also keeps a clear line between near term funding and the larger amount that depends on execution.
CIRO Short Sale Settlement Rule Takes Effect
August 11, 2026, Canada
- CIRO now requires a Participant or Access Person to have a reasonable expectation that a short sale can settle on the intended settlement date before entering the order.
- The rule adds a positive control before execution instead of relying only on action after a trade fails to settle.
- CIRO provides defined exceptions, including certain sales involving securities a person is deemed to own, subject to prescribed delivery conditions.
The rule changes where settlement risk has to be dealt with. Firms must support the expectation of settlement before a short sale reaches the market, putting more responsibility on trading controls, securities availability and supervision. Difficult to borrow securities and repeated settlement failures will show how demanding the requirement becomes in practice.
Artificial Intelligence And Data
RBI Sets Concrete AI Governance Expectations For Banks
August 11, 2026, India
- Reserve Bank of India Governor Sanjay Malhotra told banks to maintain inventories of material AI systems and establish governance that assigns clear responsibility for their use and risks.
- He called for contracts with AI providers to preserve audit, explanation and exit rights, while material systems should be stress tested and tested against adversarial behaviour before deployment and periodically afterward.
- Banks should retain meaningful human oversight where an AI error could materially harm a customer or financial stability, including lending, fraud and other consequential decisions.
RBI is pushing AI governance into the same operating disciplines banks already use for material risk. That aligns with Canadian work on regulated AI, where model oversight, vendor access, fallback plans and proof of control are becoming practical requirements. The advantage will come from deploying useful AI while being able to show who owns the risk and how the system is controlled.
Cross Border Payments And FX
Brazil Explores Linking Pix To Foreign Payment Systems
August 10, 2026, Brazil
- Brazil’s central bank is assessing bilateral connections between Pix and foreign instant-payment systems, as well as participation in multilateral payment hubs, to support lower-cost and faster cross-border transfers.
- The work goes beyond earlier discussion of possible international expansion. Banco Central do Brasil had already placed Pix Internacional on its 2027+ development agenda in March, and the August update points to more concrete interoperability options.
- Pix processed nearly 80 billion transactions worth more than R$35 trillion in 2025, giving any international connection potential scale well beyond a niche cross-border payment product.
Pix is starting to test whether a national instant-payment rail can connect directly into foreign payment infrastructure rather than relying only on traditional correspondent channels. NCFA’s cross border payments benchmark shows why that distinction matters: strong domestic rails don’t automatically solve international cost, speed or interoperability. The practical questions are which systems Brazil connects to first, how FX, compliance and settlement are handled across jurisdictions, and whether this becomes a repeatable model for other domestic real time rails.
Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization
OCC Conditionally Approves World Liberty National Trust Bank
August 14, 2026, United States
- The OCC granted preliminary conditional approval for World Liberty Trust Company, National Association, the proposed national trust bank of Trump family backed World Liberty Financial.
- The approved business plan covers USD1 issuance and redemption, maintenance of USD1 reserve assets, fiduciary digital asset custody and limited conversion services for custody customers.
- The approval is not authority to begin operations. The proposed bank is limited to trust company activities, does not plan to become an FDIC insured depository institution and must satisfy remaining OCC conditions before commencing business.
USD1 could move from a stablecoin structure supported by external service providers into a federally supervised trust bank that combines issuance, redemption, reserves and custody. That would bring more of the operating stack behind a payment stablecoin inside one regulated entity, while concentrating responsibility for reserve management, safeguarding and compliance.
Deribit Gets Dubai Broker Dealer Licence And Coinbase Liquidity
August 13, 2026, United Arab Emirates
- Deribit FZE received a Broker Dealer Licence from Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, expanding the permissions behind its existing regulated spot trading operation.
- Spot buy, sell and trade orders placed on Deribit can now be routed to Coinbase Exchange for execution, giving clients access to deeper liquidity and hundreds of additional assets.
- The upgraded spot service is rolling out to retail, qualified and institutional investors. Assets acquired through it can also be used as collateral for Deribit derivatives trading, subject to regulatory approval.
The Coinbase acquisition is moving from ownership into shared market infrastructure. Deribit can keep its derivatives interface while drawing on Coinbase's spot liquidity and execution stack, extending the Deribit acquisition strategy into day to day trading. That brings spot execution, collateral and derivatives closer together inside one regulated operating structure.
Perpetual Markets Extends Regulated European Venue Into Crypto
August 13, 2026, Cyprus / European Union
- PM MTF Ltd received CySEC authorization under MiCA for crypto asset services alongside its existing regulated European trading venue.
- The authorized activities include operating a crypto asset trading platform, custody and administration, execution of orders, reception and transmission of orders, and crypto asset transfers.
- The authorization provides a regulated route for Perpetual Markets to extend crypto services across the EEA, including infrastructure that can support institutional and white label distribution.
The significance is the combination of existing regulated market infrastructure with newly authorized crypto services. Rather than building a separate crypto venue, Perpetual Markets can extend an established MTF operating model into digital assets, giving brokers and institutions another route to offer crypto products under a European regulatory framework. The announcement authorizes expansion, but does not establish that every permitted crypto service is already live at scale.
Anchorpoint Starts Institutional Rollout Of Regulated HKD Stablecoin
August 12, 2026, Hong Kong
- Hong Kong licensed issuer Anchorpoint began phase one of HKD At Par, or HKDAP, through Beta Access for institutional distributors and professional investors.
- Authorized distributors can provide conversion between HKDAP and fiat currency for institutions, corporate users and professional investors while integrating the stablecoin into commercial and financial applications.
- Anchorpoint is initially targeting cross border payments and settlement and distribution of tokenized real world assets. Broader retail access could begin as early as the end of 2026, depending on market conditions.
Hong Kong's stablecoin regime has crossed from licensing into controlled distribution and commercial use. That builds on the tokenized finance strategy NCFA has been tracking through Standard Chartered and Hong Kong's regulators. HKDAP now has to prove that regulated tokenized money can attract repeat transaction flow across payments, asset settlement and institutional distribution rather than remain a licensed product with limited circulation.
Coinbase Gets Abu Dhabi Permission For Tokenized Securities Hub
August 11, 2026, United Arab Emirates
- Coinbase received Financial Services Permission from the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of ADGM to arrange investment deals and provide custody in support of tokenized securities.
- Coinbase says securities issued through the structure will be backed by underlying shares, with verified token holders receiving shareholder rights including dividends and voting.
- Transfers will be subject to ongoing sanctions screening, with wallet level freeze and seizure capabilities where required.
The important distinction is the legal and operating structure behind the token. Coinbase is combining regulated custody, underlying shares, investor rights and blockchain transferability rather than offering price exposure alone. That puts the model inside the infrastructure test NCFA is tracking for regulated tokenized assets: whether ownership rights, custody, compliance and transfer can work together at market scale.
Robinhood Uses Bitstamp To Bring Crypto Into Its UK App
August 10, 2026, United Kingdom
- Robinhood has begun rolling crypto trading out to eligible UK customers, adding more than 50 digital assets directly inside its main investing app alongside equities, ISAs, options and futures.
- Crypto trading is provided through Bitstamp UK Ltd, bringing the regulated UK infrastructure Robinhood acquired with Bitstamp into Robinhood’s retail distribution channel. Robinhood completed the acquisition in June 2025 to accelerate its crypto expansion outside the U.S.
- The rollout is a material follow-on to Robinhood’s July 1 announcement, when the company said UK crypto trading was coming soon but had not yet launched it. Robinhood’s own disclosure at the time still said its UK entity did not offer crypto trading or custody.
- The launch also adds Cortex Digests for Crypto, using generative AI to combine news, market data, technical indicators and Robinhood information into asset-level market summaries.
Bitstamp is becoming more than an acquired exchange for Robinhood. Its UK crypto infrastructure now lets Robinhood add digital assets to the same interface where customers already invest across traditional markets. The next test is whether that combination deepens customer activity and gives Robinhood a repeatable way to extend its wider investment platform into regulated crypto markets.
Revolut Launches Phased EURR Stablecoin Testing
August 8, 2026, Denmark / Poland / Portugal
- Revolut announced phased testing of EURR on Ethereum for eligible customers in Denmark, Poland and Portugal beginning in August.
- EURR is a euro-pegged e-money token issued by Bridge Building S.A., a Stripe company regulated by Luxembourg’s CSSF as a MiCA crypto-asset service provider and electronic money institution.
- Eligible customers can use EURR across supported crypto services, external wallets and blockchain networks. Revolut expects to add more markets later in 2026 and says stablecoins tied to other currencies are in development through separate regulatory processes.
Bridge provides the regulated issuance while Revolut distributes EURR through its customer app. NCFA tracked Bridge’s European authorizations in July. The immediate evidence is limited to phased testing in three markets, and Revolut has not published EURR circulation, adoption or transaction-volume data.
Lending Consumer Credit And BNPL
Shakepay Launches Bitcoin Backed Line Of Credit In Canada
August 13, 2026, Canada
- Shakepay launched BLOC, a revolving line of credit that lets eligible Canadian customers borrow against bitcoin held with Shakepay without selling it.
- Customers can borrow up to C$50,000 starting at 9.5% APR and track their balance, payments, collateral and loan to value ratio inside the Shakepay app.
- BLOC is offered by Shakepay Credit Inc. under exemptive relief. If collateral values fall, borrowers may need to add bitcoin, repay part of the balance or face liquidation under the product terms.
Crypto backed lending is becoming part of the product stack offered by Canadian trading platforms. Shakepay is integrating the credit relationship directly into its own account experience, while embedded crypto lending at Netcoins uses APX to supply the lending operation behind the interface. The two models create different economics and different responsibility for underwriting, collateral controls and servicing.
Better And Coinbase Open Token-Backed Mortgages
August 12, 2026, United States
- Better and Coinbase opened their token-backed conforming mortgage to eligible Coinbase One members on August 12, according to an August 26 company announcement.
- Better originates and services the mortgage, Coinbase powers the digital-asset component and the first lien is designed to meet Fannie Mae guidelines.
- Approved borrowers can pledge crypto without selling it. Eligible Coinbase One members can receive a lender-funded closing credit equal to 1% of the mortgage value, capped at US$10,000.
- The earlier waitlist represented more than US$260 million in projected loan volume. That figure indicates demand, not funded mortgages.
General availability converts the earlier token-backed mortgage launch into an open lending product. Funded volume, borrower performance, collateral custody and the treatment of pledged assets during delinquency will show whether the model can operate at conforming-mortgage scale.
Mortgage Automator Brings Construction Draw Management Into The Loan File
August 10, 2026, Canada
- Toronto based Mortgage Automator launched Draw Management, bringing construction budgets, draw schedules and approvals directly into the active loan file for private lenders.
- The feature automatically flags budget variances and applies Project Health scoring so lenders can monitor construction progress and draw risk without relying on separate spreadsheets or disconnected workflows.
- The launch follows Mortgage Automator's August 4 acquisition of Lendr, extending its expansion into construction and private lending infrastructure across North America.
Construction lending is operationally intensive because capital is released in stages and each draw depends on current budget, progress and compliance information. Moving those controls into the loan system can reduce reconciliation work and make exceptions visible earlier, while giving private lenders a more integrated way to manage construction credit as portfolios scale.
Digital Banking And BaaS
TD Adds In-App Payroll Deposit Switching With Atomic
August 10, 2026, Canada
- TD launched an in-app payroll direct-deposit switching experience that lets customers redirect payroll deposits to a TD account in about one minute with most employers.
- The capability is powered by Atomic and sits inside the TD app, removing the need for customers to separately obtain banking details and update payroll information through their employer.
- TD says it is the first Canadian financial institution to offer a fully integrated in-app payroll switching experience and has exclusive Canadian rights to Atomic’s capability through the end of 2026.
Opening a new bank account is easier than making it the primary account. Payroll switching reduces the work required to redirect recurring income and adds an operational layer to open banking and financial portability. Competition improves when customers can act on a better banking option, not only compare one. The next measure is whether easier switching translates into more primary-account relationships and deposits.
Revolut Receives Full French Banking Licence
August 10, 2026, France / Western Europe
- Revolut Bank S.A. received a full French banking licence following a joint assessment by France’s ACPR and the European Central Bank, with the decision formally adopted by the ECB Governing Council.
- The new French bank will begin serving customers in France before progressively expanding across Germany, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Revolut Bank UAB in Lithuania remains the group’s other European banking hub.
- Revolut says Western Europe now accounts for about 30 million customers. It has committed more than €1 billion to the region and is hiring more than 600 people across its Western European markets.
The licence turns Revolut’s banking expansion into a two-hub European structure with a new regulated entity serving its largest regional customer base. The execution test is how quickly customers and products migrate to the French bank, and whether local licences give Revolut more room to deepen lending, business banking and other regulated services across Western Europe.
Regulation And Policy
CFTC Uses Emergency Authority To Keep Kalshi Operating
August 11, 2026, United States
- The CFTC exercised emergency authority after Kalshi notified the Commission of a market emergency tied to litigation brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
- The Commission ordered Kalshi to continue operating in accordance with the Commodity Exchange Act Core Principles. New York is seeking to stop Kalshi from offering event contracts nationwide and is pursuing more than US$36 billion in damages.
- The CFTC says federal law requires a uniform national derivatives market and has challenged state efforts to apply gambling laws to federally regulated designated contract markets in several jurisdictions.
The dispute is becoming a direct test of who controls access to event contracts in the United States. The CFTC is treating Kalshi as national derivatives infrastructure while states continue to challenge parts of the market through gaming law. NCFA’s regulated event contract infrastructure brief tracks the same boundary between exchange regulation, market integrity and product access.
FCA Adds Five Fintechs To Scale-Up Regulatory Unit
August 10, 2026, United Kingdom
- ClearScore, Modulr, Teya, Urban Jungle and Zilch became the first firms regulated solely by the FCA to join its Scale-up Unit.
- The unit gives fast-growing regulated firms a dedicated regulatory contact for product launches, permission changes, policy developments and other issues that arise as they expand.
- The FCA also published findings from a 15-firm high-growth pilot, including weaknesses where governance, board oversight, risk management and controls had not kept pace with business growth.
The FCA is making regulatory engagement part of the scale up process rather than waiting for rapid growth to create supervisory problems. NCFA’s closer look at the five firms shows how that support intersects with payments, credit, insurance and European expansion. For fintechs, the tradeoff is clearer: faster access to regulatory guidance comes with closer attention to whether governance, controls and customer protections are developing at the same rate as products, customers and market expansion.
Senate Sets September Procedural Vote On CLARITY Act
August 8, 2026, United States
- Senate leadership filed cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, after the chamber left for its August recess without voting on the bill.
- The Senate schedule says the cloture motion will ripen on September 15 at 2:15 p.m., creating a formal procedural route toward floor consideration when senators return.
- The bill still faces a 60-vote threshold and unresolved negotiations, including bank concerns over stablecoin rewards and proposed ethics provisions.
The CLARITY Act has moved from an uncertain post-recess commitment to a scheduled Senate procedure. The September vote will test whether negotiators can assemble enough support to advance a federal market-structure framework and narrow the remaining disagreements over banking, stablecoins and digital-asset oversight.
SME Finance And Business Banking
Mercury Lets Businesses Issue Dedicated Cards To AI Agents
August 11, 2026, United States
- Mercury launched Mercury Spend with budgets, expense policies and company cards managed through one spending system.
- Businesses can issue dedicated cards to AI agents for approved transactions and monitor their spending separately from employee activity.
- Budgets and expense policies provide the control layer around those cards, while Mercury can automatically categorize transactions and lock cards when required tasks remain overdue.
The important change is that an AI agent can now receive its own controlled payment credential rather than only prepare a transaction for someone else. That makes permission design part of the payment product. NCFA has already tracked how AI agents use card rails; Mercury brings the same question inside company spending, where budgets and policy controls define how much authority software actually receives.
SIDBI Takes Invoice Fraud Controls Into Live MSME Lending
August 10, 2026, India
- SIDBI and MonetaGo confirmed that Secure Financing is live on SIDBI’s GST-Sahay invoice-based financing platform following a pilot and three months of production use.
- The system validates invoices financed through India’s TReDS infrastructure and checks invoices across participating factoring platforms and lenders, including SBI Global Factors and India Factoring.
- The production milestone follows the November 2025 SIDBI-MonetaGo partnership. The system is designed to identify duplicate financing and strengthen invoice validation before credit is advanced to MSMEs.
Invoice financing fraud controls are becoming shared lending infrastructure rather than checks performed inside one lender at a time. MonetaGo has been working on shared trade finance fraud controls for years; the SIDBI deployment brings that model into live MSME lending. The test is whether interoperable validation reduces duplicate financing and exceptions at scale while making cash flow credit faster and safer across multiple lenders and factoring platforms.
Embedded Finance
Mews Gains EEA Electronic Money Institution Licence
August 11, 2026, European Economic Area
- De Nederlandsche Bank granted Mews Financial Services B.V. an Electronic Money Institution licence, giving the hospitality software company regulated financial standing across the EEA.
- Mews plans to bring payment services, financial workflows and hotel operating data into the same platform, alongside safeguarding, fraud monitoring, sanctions screening and anti money laundering controls.
- The company processed US$19.7 billion in hotel transaction value in 2025. Regulated capabilities are expected to begin with a Netherlands pilot in late 2026 before expanding across the EEA.
Mews is taking embedded finance beyond connecting hotels to outside financial providers. Its own regulated entity can now sit inside the software where hotel revenue, operations and payments already meet. That changes the regulatory boundary for embedded finance: vertical software can become part of the licensed financial infrastructure instead of remaining only the distribution layer.
Risk Compliance And Regtech
TransFi Puts AI Into Cross Border Compliance Workflows
August 14, 2026, Global
- TransFi launched JARVIS, a proprietary compliance intelligence platform that combines KYC and sanctions screening, internet profiling, behavioural and biometric signals, and fiat and blockchain transaction monitoring.
- JARVIS builds risk profiles, uses heuristics and AI research to recommend actions on high confidence matches, and escalates complex or ambiguous cases for human review.
- Final KYC, KYB, transaction monitoring and screening decisions remain with TransFi's compliance team under MLRO oversight.
AI is entering compliance as an investigation and decision support layer rather than replacing accountable human approval. That model fits the emerging market for AI powered compliance workflows where evidence, escalation, auditability and human control determine whether automation can be trusted. TransFi's operating test is whether JARVIS reduces review effort across multiple jurisdictions without weakening decision quality.
Cybersecurity Fraud And Financial Crime
Trezor Customer Data Exposed In Shipping Provider Breach
August 13, 2026, Global
- Trezor disclosed that a breach at shipping provider ShipMonk exposed customer information including names, email addresses, phone numbers and shipping addresses.
- Approximately 11,742 customers had full contact and shipping information exposed, while another 1,947 had partial exposure, bringing the affected total to about 13,689 customers.
- Trezor says its own systems, devices and services were not compromised. The company warns that the exposed information could instead be used for more sophisticated phishing and impersonation attempts.
The breach shows how self custody can inherit risk from suppliers that never touch a private key. Fulfilment providers still hold enough identity and location data to expose hardware wallet owners to targeted attacks, making vendor controls and data retention part of hardware wallet security rather than a separate privacy issue.
Weekly Close
Financial infrastructure is becoming easier to enter and harder to operate well. Bank switching is getting simpler, payments are becoming programmable, AI agents are gaining spending authority and software platforms are taking on regulated financial roles. At the same time, regulators are putting more weight on governance, settlement discipline, market access and accountability. The competitive advantage is moving toward firms that can combine better distribution with stronger control of the infrastructure underneath it.
NCFA offers various curated resources to help founders and investors stay current on developments that impact fintech markets. Get the weekly Whisperer and related market intelligence through NCFA's newsletter, view the latest fintech insights, industry research, or launch into emerging financial innovation opportunities.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Coinbase Tests How Regulated Securities Can Work Onchain
August 13, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Digital Assets Blockchain And Tokenization, Capital Markets Infrastructure And Funding, Regulation And Policy
Coinbase Tests How Regulated Securities Can Work Onchain
On August 11, 2026, Coinbase received Financial Services Permission from the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Abu Dhabi Global Market to establish a regulated tokenization hub in Abu Dhabi, allowing it to arrange investment deals and provide custody for tokenized securities.
The licence gives Coinbase a regulated structure for putting share-backed securities into digital wallets while keeping investor rights, sanctions controls and securities rules attached. The real test is whether tokenized securities can work in digital wallets without losing the investor rights and controls behind them.
The Token Comes With Conditions
Coinbase says securities issued through the ADGM structure are fully backed by underlying shares and can give verified holders economic and voting rights.
The terms are more specific. Only securities that meet the prospectus's vesting conditions carry certain rights, including voting. Dividends are automatically reinvested, while redemption is limited to eligible vested holders. Investors exercising redemption also need an appropriate brokerage or bank account capable of receiving the proceeds.
The FSRA approved prospectus register shows the legal structure in practice. Coinbase Onchain SPV Ltd is listed as issuer of NVIDIA CB Certificates, ticker NVDAc, classified as Certificates over Shares. The primary prospectus was approved on August 4, 2026.
Investors therefore aren't simply holding NVIDIA shares on a blockchain. They're holding a Coinbase-issued security linked to underlying shares, with ownership rights governed by the certificate and prospectus.
That point matters as tokenized securities develop measurable business models around custody, distribution, liquidity and investor rights. The technology can change how a security is held and transferred without removing the legal machinery underneath it.
Wallet Access Doesn't Make The Security Permissionless
Coinbase says investors transacting only in these digital securities don't need to establish a traditional brokerage account or correspondent banking relationship. They need a wallet.
Every transfer is still subject to sanctions screening, and Coinbase says assets can be frozen or seized at the wallet level when required.
That puts the wallet in a different role from the early crypto idea of bypassing financial intermediaries. It becomes another way to distribute and hold a regulated security while identity, custody, corporate actions and redemption remain part of the system.
Several operating details aren't public yet. Coinbase hasn't disclosed the full range of securities, all eligible jurisdictions, the blockchain network, secondary trading venues or how freely the securities can move between third-party wallets and applications.
Those details will determine the scope of the hub as market infrastructure or it remains primarily a new distribution channel.
Tokenized Equities Are Competing On Distribution
Coinbase is entering a market where competitors are already testing different ways to connect tokenized securities with traditional market infrastructure.
In July, xStocks expanded into more global equity markets through a model that combines token distribution with conventional execution, custody, ledgering and recordkeeping behind the scenes.
The value isn't in listing another tokenized stock. It is in making issuance, custody, trading, corporate actions and redemption work well enough that investors can actually use the asset.
Coinbase brings its existing wallet, custody and trading network into that contest. It is also expanding beyond crypto into a wider financial platform, a strategy already visible in the competition between Coinbase and Robinhood across trading, derivatives and new financial products.
Canada remains a separate regulatory market. Coinbase Canada's investment platform expansion includes ambitions around stocks and other products, but the Abu Dhabi authorization doesn't establish approval or availability for Canadian investors.
Talking Point
If tokenized equities can travel through wallets but still depend on issuers, custodians, eligibility rules and redemption infrastructure, how much of the capital market has actually changed?
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
```
BlackRock IBQT Adds Bitcoin To Canadian ETF Portfolios
August 11, 2026 | NCFA Market Activity | Wealth Investing And Trading, Digital Assets, Competition And Market Structure
A 3% Bitcoin Allocation Built Into Portfolio Growth
On August 10, 2026, the RBC iShares alliance launched IBQT, a Toronto Stock Exchange ETF combining global equities with a targeted 3% allocation to bitcoin.
The iShares Equity + Bitcoin ETF Portfolio targets a strategic mix of approximately 97% equities and 3% bitcoin. It charges a 0.22% management fee inclusive of underlying iShares ETF fees, is eligible for Canadian registered plans and launched with about C$1 million in assets.
BlackRock introduced its Canadian IBIT in January 2025 as a standalone bitcoin investment product. IBQT currently obtains its bitcoin exposure through IBIT, putting that exposure inside the portfolio construction process. Investors own units of IBQT rather than bitcoin itself.
Portfolio ETFs Create Another Source Of Bitcoin Demand
IBQT changes how the bitcoin allocation is made. An investor doesn't have to choose a separate crypto fund or decide independently how much bitcoin to hold. The allocation is built into the portfolio.
That creates a demand channel tied to assets entering the fund. If IBQT grew to C$100 million while maintaining a 3% bitcoin target, about C$3 million of the portfolio would represent bitcoin exposure. At C$1 billion, the same target would represent about C$30 million.
Rebalancing can create another source of allocation demand when bitcoin's portfolio weight falls below target. BlackRock has not disclosed enough detail to establish a fixed rebalancing schedule or tolerance range, so IBQT should not be treated as a predictable bitcoin buying program.
The structure is still relevant to bitcoin's long term demand base.
Capital can reach bitcoin exposure because an investor bought a diversified portfolio rather than because that investor separately decided to buy a crypto fund.
Fidelity Has Already Tested The Model In Canada
BlackRock isn't first with the idea. Fidelity's All-in-One Equity ETF, FEQT, targets approximately 97% equities and 3% cryptocurrencies and currently obtains its crypto exposure through the Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF.
Fidelity also incorporates smaller crypto allocations into other all-in-one portfolios as their equity exposure declines. Its work integrating bitcoin into conventional investment infrastructure has been developing for years, including efforts to bring bitcoin into portfolio platforms rather than leave crypto entirely outside traditional wealth management.
FEQT alone had about C$5.5 billion in net assets in late July, providing evidence that a portfolio containing a small crypto sleeve can reach substantial scale in Canada.
IBQT adds BlackRock and the RBC iShares distribution platform to that competition. RBC Global Asset Management and BlackRock Canada retain separate fund management responsibilities within the alliance, which now spans more than 240 ETFs and over C$240 billion in assets.
There is also a pricing angle. IBQT launches with a 0.22% management fee inclusive of underlying iShares ETF fees. FEQT reported a 0.43% MER as of March 2026.
Bitcoin Market Check
IBQT is arriving during a much weaker bitcoin market than the environment surrounding the first wave of North American spot bitcoin ETFs.
Bitcoin was trading around US$65,000 on August 10 after a substantial decline earlier in 2026. BlackRock Canada's IBIT had grown to roughly C$390 million in net assets, giving IBQT an established Canadian bitcoin fund through which to obtain its current exposure.
See: Canadian Crypto Ownership Hits 25% In OSC Survey
Recent ETF inflows also show that investor demand can return even while bitcoin remains well below earlier highs. The growth of spot bitcoin investment products has already shown how regulated fund structures can draw both retail and institutional capital. U.S. spot bitcoin and ether ETFs attracted roughly US$1.1 billion in combined net inflows during the week leading into the IBQT launch.
Investors buying IBQT are taking on a small bitcoin allocation during a weaker market, not just after bitcoin has rallied. Portfolio inflows over the next several quarters will provide a better indication of whether this structure can attract capital across different bitcoin market conditions.
Bitcoin Price | 12-Month Market View
BTC/USD market context around the August 10, 2026 launch of BlackRock Canada's IBQT.
Chart: BTC/USD. IBQT began trading on the TSX on August 10, 2026.
Bitcoin risk remains intact. IBQT simplifies access, allocation and custody for the investor. It does not make bitcoin itself less volatile.
Talking Point
IBQT gives bitcoin access to capital that starts with a portfolio decision rather than a separate crypto purchase. Fidelity has already shown the model can reach scale in Canada. BlackRock's entry adds another channel through which growth in conventional investment products can create bitcoin exposure.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
India’s RBI On AI Governance And BRICS Payment Links
August 11, 2026 | NCFA Insight | Artificial Intelligence And Data, Cross Border Payments And FX, Regulation And Policy
Bank AI Controls Tighten As BRICS Tests Payment Connectivity
On August 11, 2026, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra called for stronger bank AI governance while confirming that BRICS members are discussing links between fast payment systems and central bank digital currencies.
Malhotra urged Indian banks to inventory the AI models they use and establish board approved AI governance policies, while arguing that banks cannot afford to avoid the technology because of its risks. The BRICS discussion is less advanced, but it has progressed beyond India's proposal earlier this year.
AI Governance Is Becoming A Bank Operating Responsibility
The RBI has been working toward this point for some time. India's FREE-AI framework was developed around responsible AI use in finance, including governance, explainability, privacy, fairness and risk controls. The central bank has also been expanding its model risk work beyond credit models into other operating areas.
Malhotra's August remarks make the institutional responsibility clearer. A bank cannot govern AI well if it cannot identify which models are running, where they are used or who owns the decisions around them. An inventory creates the starting record. Board approved governance then establishes responsibility above individual technology teams.
That becomes more important as AI spreads beyond analysis into customer service, credit, fraud detection, risk management and other live banking functions. Cybersecurity and operational risk also grow with the number of systems, vendors and data connections involved.
Canada is dealing with more or less the same operating problem. OSFI and GRI's financial AI work found that regulated deployment depends on practical controls around identity, cyber risk, financial crime, third party providers and customer outcomes. More than 170 participants contributed to that work, with 72% reporting AI use at work in financial services.
Financial regulators are asking institutions to prove control over AI that is already being used. For banks, model inventories, ownership, monitoring and escalation are becoming part of normal operating discipline.
BRICS Payment Links Advance From Proposal To Discussion
The payments comments are at an earlier stage.
In January, India proposed that BRICS members consider linking their official digital currencies for cross border trade and tourism payments. NCFA captured that proposal in its January BRICS payments evidence.
Malhotra now says BRICS members are discussing potential links between both fast payment systems and CBDCs. The objective is lower cost cross border payments, but he was equally clear that the work is still at the discussion stage.
There is no shared BRICS CBDC network, agreed settlement architecture or implementation timetable. There is also no basis for treating the discussions as evidence that a common BRICS currency is being created. Official BRICS material has instead focused on reducing the cost of trade and financial transactions and improving payment links between member countries.
The addition of fast payment systems is also important. CBDCs are only one possible route. Connecting existing national payment rails may offer another way to improve cross border transfers without waiting for every participating country to deploy a mature digital currency.
More Capability Means More Governance At Every Layer
Malhotra did not present AI governance and BRICS payment connectivity as a single program, however combined they do expose a common operating issue. Inside a bank, more capable AI requires clearer ownership, controls and auditability. Between countries, more connected payment systems require agreements around access, standards, settlement, legal responsibility and risk.
See: AI Agents Enter Governed Financial Workflows
Interoperability is useful only when participants know who is accountable when something fails. The same is true for AI performing more important financial work.
For Canadian readers, the comparison is timely. Canada's financial infrastructure is becoming more open through new payment system access, PSP supervision and the Real Time Rail, while banks are also deploying more AI. Different technologies are involved, but both require stronger operating controls as access and automation expand.
Talking Point
Financial infrastructure gets harder to govern as it becomes more capable and connected. The RBI's AI expectations and the BRICS payment discussions show that control, accountability and interoperability are becoming operating questions, not side issues for innovation teams.
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem that provides education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities and services to thousands of community members and works closely with industry, government, partners and affiliates to create a vibrant and innovative fintech and funding industry in Canada. Decentralized and distributed, NCFA is engaged with global stakeholders and helps incubate projects and investment in fintech, alternative finance, crowdfunding, peer-to-peer finance, payments, digital assets and tokens, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cryptocurrency, regtech, and insurtech sectors. Join Canada's Fintech & Funding Community today FREE! Or become a contributing member and get perks. For more information, please visit: www.ncfacanada.org
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
Can Tokenized Gold Become Wholesale Market Collateral?
Can Gold Move From The Vault Into Wholesale Finance?
Last Updated: August 10, 2026
Status: Emerging
Status: Emerging
Organizations: UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority, World Gold Council, London Bullion Market Association (LBMA)
On August 10, 2026, the Financial Times reported that the UK FCA is talking with banks and market participants about how tokenized gold could fit within the regulatory framework, including its possible use as collateral in wholesale markets.
The FCA declined to comment to the FT and hasn't published a gold specific framework, consultation or rule. But the discussion connects two developments already under way. UK authorities are working on tokenized collateral for wholesale markets, while the gold industry is trying to make physical bullion easier to own, transfer and pledge.
So can tokenized gold actually become collateral in wholesale markets?
Possibly, but creating the token is the easy part. A bank or market operator still has to trust the ownership claim, know where the bullion sits, value it quickly and take control if the borrower fails. Its own rules also have to permit gold as collateral.
That last hurdle matters. The UK is building infrastructure for tokenized collateral, but the Bank of England's current work focuses on tokenized versions of assets that already qualify. Gold isn't currently eligible collateral under the Bank's Sterling Monetary Framework.
Private markets could get there sooner. Banks and other wholesale counterparties have more room to agree on collateral terms between themselves. Acceptance by a clearing house would be a bigger step. Central bank eligibility would go further again.
This is why tokenized gold is different from simply launching another real world asset product. NCFA's analysis of tokenization in collateral and cash shows that institutional adoption is strongest where digital assets solve a real operating problem. Gold now has to pass that test.
Strategic Takeaway
Tokenized gold becomes useful collateral when institutions can trust the claim, control the asset and sell it quickly if something goes wrong. Better technology helps, but it can't grant collateral status on its own.
Tokenized gold becomes useful collateral when institutions can trust the claim, control the asset and sell it quickly if something goes wrong. Better technology helps, but it can't grant collateral status on its own.
Evidence
Click each item to expand
1. Gold Enters The UK Tokenization Discussion August 2026, United Kingdom ⓘ
The Financial Times reports that the FCA has been discussing tokenized gold with major banks and other market participants, including whether it could be used as collateral in wholesale markets.
- The discussions concern the regulatory treatment of tokenized gold.
- Wholesale collateral is one of the potential uses being considered.
- The FCA declined to comment to the FT.
- No gold specific FCA proposal or rule has been published.
That makes this credible early evidence of regulatory interest, not a policy decision. What happens next depends on whether the industry can show that tokenized ownership works inside existing market controls.
2. UK Authorities Are Already Working On Tokenized Collateral May 2026, United Kingdom ⓘ
The FCA and Bank of England set out a joint vision for UK wholesale tokenization in May. Collateral is one of the areas where firms have asked for clearer rules and infrastructure.
- The programme covers prudential treatment, tokenized collateral and settlement instruments.
- Sixteen firms are working through the Digital Securities Sandbox toward live issuance and settlement.
- The Bank is targeting a live synchronisation service for 2028.
- It is also working toward accepting tokenized versions of assets that are already eligible collateral at central counterparties and in its own operations.
The distinction is important. The programme can help an eligible security retain its collateral role when it is tokenized. It doesn't make a new asset eligible simply because someone puts it on a digital ledger.
Europe is dealing with the same operating challenge from another direction. The ECB roadmap for tokenized finance infrastructure focuses on connecting digital wholesale markets with central bank settlement rather than treating tokenization as a standalone product.
3. The Gold Industry Is Changing The Ownership Model 2025 To 2026, United Kingdom ⓘ
The World Gold Council is tackling a problem that exists before the token arrives.
Allocated gold gives an investor ownership of specific physical bars, but that precision adds operating friction. Unallocated gold trades more easily, but the investor holds a claim against an institution rather than title to specific bullion.
The proposed Pooled Gold Interest is designed to sit between those structures.
- Investors would hold a beneficial interest in a pool of vaulted physical gold.
- The model allows fractional ownership rather than requiring whole bars.
- Linklaters developed a legal framework for issuing and transferring the interests.
- Easier use of gold as collateral is one of the stated goals.
That legal structure is central to the question. A collateral taker needs more than proof that a token exists. It needs an enforceable claim on the gold if the borrower fails.
The same distinction between digital representation and usable market infrastructure sits behind Are Tokenized RWAs Legal And Becoming Market Infrastructure?
4. Shared Infrastructure Is Being Built Around The Bullion March 2026, Global ⓘ
The World Gold Council's proposed Gold as a Service platform addresses the operating layer. A gold token is only as reliable as the records connecting it to the bullion in the vault.
- The proposed platform connects physical custody with digital issuance.
- It would standardize reconciliation, compliance and redemption.
- Token supply could be kept aligned with physical inventory records.
- The World Gold Council identifies collateralized borrowing as a possible use, subject to legal enforceability, custody and market infrastructure.
That qualification does a lot of work. Digital infrastructure may make gold easier to lock, transfer and release. The lender still needs a reliable right to the asset and a practical way to turn it into cash.
5. Gold Already Has The Market Depth 2026, Global ⓘ
Gold doesn't need a token to become a liquid asset. It already trades at enormous scale.
- The World Gold Council estimates roughly US$31 trillion of gold exists above ground.
- More than US$15 trillion is considered investable gold across private holdings, official holdings and derivatives.
- Global gold trading averaged about US$361 billion per day in 2025.
- Average daily trading reached about US$488 billion in the first half of 2026.
That gives gold an advantage over many tokenized assets. There is already a deep market and established pricing. The challenge is connecting that liquidity to a digital claim that collateral takers can actually use.
6. Physical Gold Still Faces An Eligibility Gap June 2026, United Kingdom ⓘ
The London Bullion Market Association is separately asking UK authorities to reconsider how gold fits within the liquidity framework.
- LBMA says allocated gold held at the Bank of England can be transferred and monetized quickly.
- It argues that current regulatory treatment doesn't fully reflect that practical liquidity.
- LBMA wants greater recognition of gold in firms' liquidity assessments.
- It also asks regulators to consider whether gold could eventually become eligible collateral for Bank of England facilities.
That exposes the biggest gap. If physical allocated gold isn't currently eligible Bank collateral, tokenizing it won't remove the policy decision that comes first.
7. Tokenized Gold Products Are Arriving Before Collateral Acceptance 2025 To 2026, Global ⓘ
Institutions are already proving that physical gold can be represented and distributed digitally. HSBC has offered tokenized gold, DBS plans tokenized physical gold for customers in Singapore, and other issuers are expanding digital bullion products and infrastructure.
NCFA's evidence base also includes Tether's US$150 million investment in Gold.com, NatGold reporting more than US$469 million in premarket token demand, the DBS initiative and a bullion platform venture between AGTech and the Hong Kong Gold Exchange.
Together, those developments show growing demand, distribution and infrastructure. They don't show that the tokens are being posted as margin to clearing houses or widely accepted under institutional financing agreements.
That is the line this Question is tracking.
What Turns A Gold Token Into Collateral
The next proof is a financing transaction. A regulated bank accepting tokenized gold against a real loan, credit line or margin obligation would show that the ownership structure works beyond issuance. The terms would tell us even more. Who holds the bullion? How much of its value can be borrowed against? What happens if the borrower defaults? Can the lender take control immediately?
See: AuCan Launches $2.5B Tokenised Gold RWA Platform
Those are ordinary collateral questions. Tokenization changes how the asset is recorded and transferred, but it doesn't make them disappear.
This is also where gold separates from tokenized Treasuries. Government securities already function inside mature repo, margin and central bank collateral systems. Their digital versions are trying to preserve an existing function while changing how the asset moves.
Gold has deep liquidity and established institutional ownership, but a more limited role inside regulated collateral frameworks. Private banks could accept tokenized gold first, particularly where they already understand bullion custody and financing. Wider dealer use would be stronger evidence. Acceptance by a central counterparty would show that the asset can meet tougher rules for valuation, control and liquidation.
The Bank of England is another threshold entirely. LBMA is still making the case for physical gold to become eligible, so tokenized gold clearly hasn't reached that point yet.
Canada offers a useful infrastructure comparison without forcing a Canadian gold story. Project Samara tested tokenized bond issuance, trading and lifecycle management with wholesale central bank settlement. The CSA has also opened Project Tokenization to examine how tokenized products and market infrastructure fit Canadian securities law. Neither establishes tokenized gold collateral in Canada. They show the kind of coordinated legal and settlement work that has to sit underneath institutional tokenization.
Why London Has More At Stake
London isn't searching for a tokenization use case. It already is at the centre of one of the world's deepest wholesale gold markets. If the ownership, custody and regulatory pieces can be made to work together, tokenization could make existing bullion easier to move between banks, trading venues and collateral accounts. The value would come from making a large market work better, not from creating another digital asset to trade.
See: Tokenized Infrastructure Is Changing How Markets Operate
There is also competition. Asian financial centres are investing in bullion markets, tokenized assets and digital settlement, while major central banks are building new wholesale infrastructure. London's existing market depth is an advantage, but only if the digital version preserves the legal certainty and liquidity that made the physical market valuable in the first place.
For now, the answer remains conditional. Tokenized gold has credible building blocks and a plausible route into private wholesale collateral. What it doesn't yet have is broad institutional acceptance.
The moment to watch is not the next gold token. It is the first repeatable collateral transaction where a regulated institution is willing to rely on one.
Do you agree the evidence supports this answer?
Click Agree or Disagree. Your vote is recorded anonymously and aggregate results are tracked.
Explore Trending Questions
Are Tokenized RWAs Legal And Becoming Market Infrastructure? ⓘ
How Is Crypto Custody Regulation Changing? ⓘ
Are Stablecoins Becoming Payment Infrastructure? ⓘ
How Is Crypto Custody Regulation Changing? ⓘ
Are Stablecoins Becoming Payment Infrastructure? ⓘ
The National Crowdfunding & Fintech Association (NCFA Canada) is a financial innovation ecosystem providing education, market intelligence, industry stewardship, networking and funding opportunities to thousands of members. NCFA works with industry, government, partners and affiliates to support a competitive and innovative fintech and funding sector in Canada. Join Canada’s Fintech and Funding Community or learn more at NCFA Canada.
| | |
|---|---|---|
| | |
